#help-26
1 messages · Page 150 of 1
a recurrence relation can be turned into a matrix
eigenvectors can help you easily calculate powers of matrices
the recurrence will turn into an arbitrary power of a matrix and you use the eigenvalue decompostion to calculate it
resulting the explicit solution to the recurrence relation
oh wow
i did that to calculate the fibonacci sequence before
how efficient is it?
i see
because I think there are explicit formulas for arbitary constants coeficients
but the thing is it has a systematic theme to it
so you can see pattern and write a solution
yes there is
and these formulas can be proven with that exact method
very good
there are other methods too
you can turn the constant coeff equation into a differential equation and solve it
what?
although in many cases it can reduce to a simple algebraic equation
told you that equations can come in many shapes ?
well there is a set of equations called differential equations
those are ones which involve derivatives
these are included in calculus
there is an easy way to solve the constant coeff ones
you just substitute e^mx
and calculate m
it will result in the same characterstic equation
$\dot{x} + \ddot{x} = 0$
violet
substitute e^mx
because its easier
it is
derivative of e^mx is me^mx
so first one becomes me^mx and second one is m^2e^mx
the e^mx cancels out
you get m+m^2=0
oh
so either m = 0 or m = -1
could have never thought differntial equations and recurrence relations are so similar
incredibly similar
that's why one of the methods of solving differential equations is turning them into recurrence relations
and one of the methods of solving recurrence relations is turning them into differential equations?
yes xD
haha
whichever the one that is easier to solve you switch to it xD
group theory seems fun
what is the funniest math area?
idk i love all of it
i will be biased toward mathematical analysis since i spent like 4 years self studying the book of rudin
but it's all fun
sorta like that
but it establishes the meaning of infinity
and creates a basis which you can rely on to prove anything in calculus
and more
you can prove that infinities can have different sizes xD
uncountably infinite ones have infinitely many sizes
there is a theorem which says that the power set of any set can never be in one to one correspondance with that set
hence every time you calculate the power set of a set it gets bigger
what do you mean when you say a set is in one to one corresponance with another?
equal cardinality?
that is the way we define cardinality yes
if you can find a bijective map between two sets
they have the same cardinality
oh
so you can assert a set is smaller than another if the first to second is one to many
that is smart
you can find one to many sets
but the key is
you cannot find a one to one
every map you find must be many to one
if that's the case
one is bigger
why can you not find one to one sets
example, the real numbers are bigger than the integers
because they are equal by extensionality?
you mean maps
sets cannot be called one to one
yes maps
it's the map
why not one to one?
because you can prove that you can't
that's why
can you find a one to one map between reals and integers ?
no
for the purpose of this let's stick to reals between 0 and 1
did you try ?
there is a way you can make one more real number out of existing
when you have coreesponded them with the naturals
great you know the drill
no, because i realized
that's one example of why you can't get bijections between sets sometimes
it's called cantor diagonalization
there is something about infinity
it's crazy and I love it
the power set of R is bigger
that's the point
the power set of the power set of R is bigger than the power set of R which is bigger than R
i thought there were only countable and uncountable infinity
and now there is infinitely many of them
so countable infinities are those that biject N
yes
and uncountable infinities are those that
um
are many to one in correspondence to N
?
okay
just add the word not and it fixes everything
much like a finite set is one which is in bijection with the set {1,2,3,...,n}
and an infinite set is one which is not finite
yea
by the way, what topics do one learn in uni?
like the general
path
considering maths
i don't even know what you will learn
it will be some years before I go ( or not go)
my college is the faculty of engineering
I learnt all the math on my own
they don't do rigorous math here
how much time do you spend on maths everyday?
nowadays not a huge amount
but when I was younger I would do math whenever i'm not doing anything else
my free time was all math
thats me
yes as you get older other stuff start to kick in
you know getting job and stuff
you also often feel like you wanna turn your brain off for a while
but in your age it's normal
so make the most of it while you can
ty
^ ^
any thing you recommend me to learn in maths (self-study, no teacher)
because as I mentioned there are many areas which i dont have the knowledge
how much time do they take
and anything else will be easy
time is relative
I spent 4 years on a book you can finish in less than a year
but I like to take my time because I don't read the proofs
I do them myself
and If I leave and come back I redo all of them
I have proven chapters from rudin more than 6 times
because if how many times I came back to revise
and I'm doing one more revision now as we speak
no real analysis only
there is baby rudin, papa rudin and grandpa rudin
the picture has papa rudin
you need baby rudin
where does it say papa rudin?
i'm saying this for a reason, papa rudin legit builds upon the last chapter of baby rudin so you literally need it
it doesn't say that's what people call them xD
baby rudin = principles of mathematical analysis
papa rudin = real and complex analysis
grandpa rudin = functional analysis
what is functional analysis?
that's a topic for another day xD
there is something called functional
which is a map that maps entire functions
just a short introduction will do
it doesn't map value
that is crazy!
but maps the whole path
optimization over a functional is called the calculus of variations and that's where lagrangian comes in
you learn that in calculus
the take derivative and make it zero thing
but in a more general sense
you optimize for something you don't know
the meaning of that comes when you use it in physics
only then do you know what you are optimizing
in lagrange mechanics you are optimizing what is called the "Action"
you can look up "Principle of Least Action"
the action is a functional which relies on the function representing the path
in physics it would be the particle path or the pendulum path
it was chosen to make the action stationary
there is another principle in optics called fermat principle
says light travels in the path which takes the least time
total time spent would then be the functional and you would optimize over it
there is much more than that ofc but I'm just giving you a simple idea
i see
i was looking at the table of contents
i saw topology
dont know if i'll like it
well I'm here xD I know the whole table of contents by heart
first is introduction to real numbers
then general topology which is really nice
it won't rely on anything you know
rudin defines everything
hence the name baby rudin xD
the book pretends you are a baby
in the topology chapter you will get some definitions for infinity and sequences and all that
then definition of a metric space
what neighbourhoods are
and basic definitions like limit points and interior points, open sets, closed sets etc
its like you build everything from ground up
yesss
in chapter 9 you jump to vector values functions
in 10 you carry integration to more than one dimensions with differential forms
and last chapter introduces a beautiful generalization of integration
the lebesgue integral
whenever i wanna prove anything I just resort back to rudin in analysis and artin in abstract algebra
a basis in algebra and one in analysis makes you able to understand anything
start with whichever you like first
I did analysis because it was more useful to me
it shows up more in engineering
also I liked the crazy concepts of infinity
but the two fields will cross from time to time
chapter 9 in rudin requires matrices
and in artin an introduction to solving differential equations with matrices required some analysis
they aren't
but it speaks about both
linear transformations are from one vector space to another
linear operators are from one vector space to itself
so you say the map operates on a vector space
hence the name operator
So this one's a mapping and the other one a transformation?
I think those books will take a while, they dont look easy
i'll have a read anyways
hopefully i can get through them
after all i have got 3 years before i go to uni
i have to go now, see you later mohsen
many thanks for your teaching
.close
Closed by @wraith iron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.reopen
i mapping is a transformation
Closed by @wet harbor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
From what I've heard, a transformation maps an element of a set onto an element of that same set while mapping is the more general term
Could be wrong though
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, how do I prove that:
8cot(pi/4) + 4tan(pi/8) + 2tan(pi/16) + tan(pi/32) = cot(pi/32)
I've attempted to rewrite it as 8 + 4tan(4pi/32) + 2tan(2pi/32) + tan(pi/32) and use the double-angle formula tan(2x) and the quadruple-angle formula tan(4x) but so far I haven't yielded any useful results
Can you suggest some approaches to this problem
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I wonder if there is a nice combinatorial proof with generating function. I will keep this question on the back burner 🙂
I attempted using algebra and trig identities but it didn't seem like it would lead to a useful result
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
$8cot(\frac{\pi}{4}) + 4tan(\frac{\pi}{8}) + 2tan(\frac{\pi}{16}) + tan(\frac{\pi}{32}) = cot(pi/32)$
Sukiyaki
For anyone who wants to help him
@neon iron
I dont know if this is the correct answer.
but $8cot \frac{\pi}{4}$ should be $\frac{8}{tan\frac{\pi}{4}}$ as the Reciprocal rule for COT should be $\frac{1}{tan \theta}$
Sukiyaki
So if you reciprocate the cot pi/4, sum it all up
you can prove that it is the same as cot pi/32
I am pretty sure double angle formula for tangent will work. Try it with induction, and build up the identity.
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
Hi
Ok?
Hold one of your fingers
Closed by @slate shoal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is the answer 3^11/11? We have 11 spaces where we can choose 3 colours in each, hence 3^11. We divide by 11 because of the rotations
@vital dune let's do a smaller example with 2 colors and 4 placements
let's say we have red and blue, and so our combinations are RRRR, RRRB, RRBB, RBRB, RBBB, BBBB
Ok
we would expect 2^4/4 from your formula above, but that is 4. And we have 6 here. What went wrong?
I think the division by 4 is fine, the problem might be in 2^4
well, not quite
it's actually the other way around
There's only one way to make RRRR, but we divided this possibility by 4
similarly with BBBB
Ohh yeaah
There are only 2 ways to make RBRB, similarly
thankfully, 11 is prime, so we only have to worry about edge cases, seemingly
(also it should immediately bother you that 3^11 / 11 is not an integer)
Yes good point
Why is that?
if we consider why there were only two ways to make RBRB, it's because it was a pattern with period 2. Which divides 4
so only patterns with periods that are divisible by the total number of beads we need to handle carefully
but for 11 that's only 1 (all one color) or 11 (any other kind of pattern)
Ahh
So the edge cases are all Red, all Yellow, all Blue?
yup
Oh right, I am still processing what you said about the periods lol
I shouldn't post the answer though, tbh
Oh no problem
So basically if it was 12 then we would need to work more to get the answer
yes, because you'd have to handle the following cases:
period 1, period 2, period 3, period 4 but not period 2, period 6 but not period 2 OR period 3, and period 12
So period n is for those when rotating n times in the same direction gets you the same as the original one?
But then why not period 7 for example?
because 7 doesn't divide 12
if you tried you'd get 7, then 5 left over
but you can't fit a copy of the 7 in those 5 spots
so for 12 it would be 3 (period 1) + (3^2 - 3)/2 (period 2) + (3^3 - 3)/3 (period 3) + (3^4 - 3^2)/4 (period 4) + (3^6 - 3^3 - 3^2 + 3)/6 (period 6) + (3^12 - (3^6 - 3^3 - 3^2 + 3) - (3^4 - 3^2) - (3^3 - 3) - (3^2 - 3) - 3) / 12 (period 12)
How did you get that?
oh, I see my error.
ok so, let's work this through one period at a time
period 1, there are three possibilities RRRRRRRRRRRR, BBBBBBBBBBBB, and YYYYYYYYYYYY
so that's just 3
period 2, we have all of the following possibilities RBx6, RYx6, BYx6, but how do we count them?
well, first recognize that we can choose any two colors for the two positions. That's 3^2
but if we leave it here, we'll also be overcounting, because we would have counted RRx6 and so on
So we need to exclude RR, BB, and YY because we've already counted them, that's 3^2 - 3
Oh I think I get it. Can we see it for period n, dividing the circle into n parts and subs tracting the periods that are divisible by n?
and finally, we divide by the period because RBx6 is equivalent to BRx6
similarly for period 3
but there's a complication for period 4
for period 4 we need combinations that don't contain period 2 or period 1
so we have 3^4 - (3^2 + 3) - 3
which is 3^4 - 3^2, then divide by 4, so (3^4 - 3^2)/4
next for period 6.
that's (3^6 - 3^3 + 3 - 3^2 + 3 - 3)/6 = (3^6 - 3^3 - 3^2 + 3)/6
where we subtracted the 3s, and the 2s, and the 1s, but we're left with an overall add 3.
are you following so far?
Why we need to add 3?
have you ever heard of the inclusion exclusion principle? I think something similar is happening here.
Yes
I thought of that when you started explaining it to me
Ohh, I got it
Okok, thanks @whole geode for your help!!!
no worries, glad to help
.close
Closed by @vital dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone explain me how to multiply huge decimals like 0,2981/0,6729 * 1,7480/0,1872? Numbers are purely arbitrary, so might not be correct - I just can't grasp the concept. Am I supposed to do the division first or multiply numerators and denominators seperately and then divide? I can multiply them successfully but dividing such huge decimals is a big hassle for me
Doesn't matter
You can multiply the numerators and denominators, THEN do the division if you wanted
Otherwise you can simplify both fractions and THEN multiply them together. Same answer.
I mean I do multiply them successfully but when both numerator and denominators are huge decimals with many numbers, I just fail to divide
Does simplfying first work? Sounds cool. I'll give it a chance
@jolly oar Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @jolly oar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I find the bounds for theta 
0 to pi, then multiply the integral by 2
@clever citrus Has your question been resolved?
wait what
why multiply the integral
why even bring an integral when finding the bounds for theta
I think the limits would be from 0 to pi and if you need an integral for something it would not be necessary to multiply by two since it is not like a circle with a center (0.0), correct me if I'm wrong
bro why r u guys talking aboit integrals when finding the bound for theta
Im acc so lost rn

this was the original question. Im getting a triple integral for this
int(a to b) int(0 to -5sintheta) int(0 to 6(1-r^2/25)) r dz dr dtheta
Im just not sure what the theta bounds would be so I put in a and b for now
but are you guys trying to say that
Guyz
it would be something like:
2(int(0 to 1) int(0 to -5sintheta) int(0 to 6(1-r^2/25)) r dz dr dtheta)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
Given D, we can get
x^2 + (y + 5/2)^2 <= 25/4
(rcostheta)^2 + (rsintheta + 5/2)^2 <= 25/4
r(r + 5sintheta) <= 0
solving for r we get 0 and -5sintheta
r bounds:
0 <= r <= -5sintheta
and then I gotta solve for theta
(? not sure how 😭 )
Now for the upper half of the ellipsoid
we can solve it for z to get
z = pm 6(1 - x^2/25 - y^2/25)
Since we want the upper half we can ignore negative:
z = 6(1 - r^2/25)
0 <= z <= 6(1-r^2/25)
.reopen
✅
this is my draft so far
No
wait wym
Remember yesterday
maybe I was approaching it in a wrong way
wait nah can u help me with this for now
that one imma focus on it at the end
Ok let's see
I think I got everything covered beside the bounds for theta
Expand this
r^2+25/4+5r/2 sintheta
It should be + right?
Okok it's corrext
Correct*
Let's check forward
@clever citrus
Did u try this
,w range -5sin theta
Ok now we can get a clear idea for theta
What coordinate system are you trying to write your integral in??
Polar coordinates
Ok, get rid of the z btw
You shouldn’t be solving for z
So he should be solving for x or y?
No he needs to solve for r
What
that cant be the bound for theta right?
Polar is rho, phi, theta
Bro see this has some relation
would require the bounds for theta aswell no?
With u calculating the upper half
oh
Like how theta varies
If I asked you to write an iterated integral finding just the volume under the ellipsis what would you say?
And like how bro is saying phi rho and theta
Or even just, what if it’s a sphere
in this question they had me deal with the upper half of ellipsoid so what I did was I solved for z and discarded the negative solution
,w draw x^2+y^2+z^2=1
Ok but the upper half part is covered by phi
$\phi$
Calc III Victim
A sphere we have
Do yk what rho, theta, and phi are?
,w define phi
$\rho$
Calc III Victim
No it did not give the polar definition
we dont rlly use these in class
Oh wait you said Polar not spherical
so im not sure
ye
so how would u do it
a clear definition
Nvm lmao I changed my mind
,w -5sin(theta) <= 0
Why he is using r and theta
💀☠️
Go read this first
,w define spherical coordinates
A clear definition
bro
@clever citrus what is your question?
alr one sec lemme type the whole thing out
This
Surely you should start with something easier
Not in offensive way, but your head will explode if you do spherical too early imo
For this question what I have done so far is
I found the bounds for r and z which are
x^2 + (y + 5/2)^2 <= 25/4
(rcostheta)^2 + (rsintheta + 5/2)^2 <= 25/4
r(r + 5sintheta) <= 0
r bounds:
0 <= r <= -5sintheta
Now for the upper half of the ellipsoid
we can solve it for z to get
z = pm 6(1 - x^2/25 - y^2/25)
Since we want the upper half we can ignore negative:
z = 6(1 - r^2/25)
0 <= z <= 6(1-r^2/25)
but this should be a triple integral right
int_(bound for theta) int(0 to -5sintheta) int(0 to 6(1-r^2/25)) r dz dr dtheta
the only thing Im having trouble is coming up with the bounds for theta
bro

ive done polar coordinates alrdy its just that I forgot most of the shit I learnt in calc 1/2 so im having trouble solving
-5sin(theta) >= 0
right
,w solve sintheta<=0
how would I write the bounds for theta given that 
Wait let's get a quick review of
Brother this is not polar coordinates in 2d though
,w graph x^2+y^2+5y<=0
This means that
Here try this, find the volume of the top half of the sphere x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 1
All the region inside the circle
Would that be like very easy for you?
x^2+(y+5/2)^2=25/4
@clever citrus Has your question been resolved?
,w graph x^2/25+y^2/25+z^2/36=1 , x^2+y^2+5y<=0
,w draw x^2+y^2+5y<=0 inside x^2/25+y^2/25+z^2/36=1
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
Aah
?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
This is called cylindrical coordinates
Polar coordinates implies spherical which is completely different
I’m pretty sure your theta bounds are wrong
You need to find the theta values where the two graphs intersect
Those will be your bounds
You just found bounds of D, remember it also needs to be inside the ellipsoid
@clever citrus Has your question been resolved?
Ok jk I’m crazy my bad, I think you are right, the cylinder is contained inside the ellipsoid so it’s good
Thought the cylinder was bigger
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let the function ( u(x,y) ) be continuous on the closed region ( D ). Inside ( D ), the function ( u(x,y) ) has continuous second partial derivatives, and satisfies the conditions ( \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial y^2} = 0 ) and ( \frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial x \partial y} \neq 0 ). Then is the following statements correct?
The maximum and minimum values of ( u(x,y) ) are both obtained on the boundary of ( D ).
riyobi
looks like a harmonic function
Hmm any ideas?
seems to be on wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_function#Maximum_principle
but it requires the closed region to be compact
@strong sable Has your question been resolved?
@strong sable Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
8xy+10xz-14xw
this is not a cube
do you have a screenshot of the q
the best thing you can do here is pull out a gcf
ok cool yeah, x is common in all the terms, and also take out the gcf of 8,10,14
the gcf of it is 2x
the answer would be 2x(4y+5z-7w)
but how do I split it
or not
@low monolith Has your question been resolved?
yes this looks good
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont know where to start
first rewrite that logarithm
implicit differentiation
2/y dy/dx?
that looks correct yeah
now algebraically solve for dy/dx
,, \frac 2y y' - 4(y + xy') = 0
!Kiz__
write this out properly but yes
idk how to use that
well u don't have to
i just meant you should write it out unambiguously on paper or on ^
,w simplify (4y)/(2/y - 4x)
💀
Closed by @foggy igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this a mistake? How did 2x/sqrtx become 3x^1/2?
yea looks like a typo
Yes
Yes
Closed by @royal imp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone tell me why this point would not be on the circle
bc
i calculated and got
(x-2)^2 + (y-5)^2 = 5^2
and then i plugged in the point
so (3-2)^2 + (2-5)^2 = 10
so 1+9
WHICH EQUALS 10
but the thing said the point does not lie on the line
so yeah
oh nvm
five squared is 25
rookie mistakr
.close
Closed by @rustic wren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for 1, extend the line AB
?
since they want you to prove the angle is theta + 60, find a line that divides that angle in two parts such that you can prove one part is theta and the other is 60deg
idk how u do that tho
like i said, extend the line and use the two divisions of the angles that are formed due to this
bro
ur not making sense
extend the line??
js make it longer??
idk what u mean bro
idk what u mean by the second part of ur sentance either
extend like this
and so you have divided the angle DBC into two parts as a consequence
i still dk what u do after 😭
.close
Closed by @hushed geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Shouldn't Lucy's acceleration be negative I think?
Is eastward positive?
@hard kelp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
Im getting 40 since for each value of B from 0 to 10, we have 4 possible values of (A,C)
I wanted to double check with someone if this is the right approach
be careful about double counting
252
also I don't think you have 4 possible values
ok
B can range from 0 to 9
so there are 10 possible values
now how many possible values are there for A
or c
okay so 2
yeaj
alr, so you are right with 40 except for the double counting
all goofd
I think it is indeed 40
are u able to think of a scenario where double counting is happening
yeah, i was confused because of the a,c!=0 condition
you can try coding it to check your result
I think it's not necessary, but i will actually try it
huh, what did I do incorrectly?
oh i see
!= 0 instead of != "0"
it is 40
I got it as well
also say for question 6 I am struggling on the part where multiplying one of them cancels out d
I still dont see how its canceling d out
@near root Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @near root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does anyone know what this means?
like we need to find a subspace S in R4 such that S is a proper subset of H and S direct sum span(-1,1,1,a) = T orthogonal
@burnt swift Has your question been resolved?
@burnt swift Has your question been resolved?
didn't we find S earlier
and you know (-1,1,1,a) is in T orthogonal
so (-1,1,1,a) . (1,1,-1,1) = 0
can we go slower
and after we are done can we make a summary of the steps we made
or is it too much to aak
ok
but at least recap what we did last time
that you understood
and the parts you didn't understand
A and B are orthogonal
if dot product of a and b is 0
for any a, for any b
THE orthogonal of a set A, is the subspace that contains ALL vectors orthogonal to A
.
no but
what does this mean btw
T is a span
like the direct sum of S and this shit <(-1,1,1,a)> is equal to T orthogonal
whatever that means
yes
meaning
each vector in T orthogonal
is the sum of a vector of S and a scalar multiple of (-1,1,1,a)
span = smallest subspace that contains ...
basis is not the same thing exactly
anyways if you have vectors v1,v2,...
<v1,v2...> is the smallest subspace
that contains all of those vectors
here
v = (1,1,-1,1)
T = <(1,1,-1,1)>
T is the smallest subspace
that contains that vector
so T contains every vector x*(1,1,-1,1)
or (x,x,-x,x)
span is not the same as generating family
span refers to subspaces
generating family refers to the "system" of vectors
how would you define span
.
A = {v_i}
we write S = span(A) or <A>
the smallest subspace that contains all vectors of A
so
<(1,1,-1,1)>
what is $\mathbb{K}$ btw
938c2cc0dcc05f2b68c4287040cfcf71
.
a(1,1 -1,1)
a(1,0,1,0)+b(0,2,3,0)
yes
so last thing
just notice that (1,0,1,0) and (0,2,3,0) GENERATE <(1,0,1,0),(0,2,3,0)>
but they're only a basis BECAUSE they are linearly independent
yeah its a generador
yes, for example, <(1,0,0,0), (2,0,0,0)>
though (1,0,0,0), (2,0,0,0) generate it
it's not a basis
yeah
not linearly independent
my confusion was regarding the direct sum
like what does this mean
direct sum
S direct sum a generator = t perp
means that intersection is {0}
S and <(-1,1,1,a)> have no elements in common, except 0 vector
so
S + <(-1,1,1,a)> is the sum of those subspaces
KNOWING
that they have only 0 vector in common
yeah direct sum
what does T perp mean though?
THE orthogonal of a set A, is the subspace that contains ALL vectors orthogonal to A
rafilou2003
where is M mentioned
$T^\perp$ is the orthogonal complement of T
rafilou2003
how do you know
it's
the DEFINITION
of the notation
T^perp literally means "orthogonal complement of T"
how do u know <(-1,1,1,a)> is orthogonal to T
it's a subset of T^perp
C
then <(-1,1,1,a)> is subset of...
okay how do I find S and a tho
T perp
ok so let's start with a
<(-1,1,1,a)> subset of T perp
so (-1,1,1,a) is in T perp
T perp is the orthogonal complement of T
so (-1,1,1,a) is perpendicular to...
S
it's not S here
im not sure
S is a random subspace
let me rewrite that with notations that are completely related
yeah can u do a drowing
Si $T$ es un subespacio vectorial de $\bR^4$, el complemento orthogonal de $T$, $T^\perp$, está formado por los vectores que son perpendiculares a todos los vectores de $T$.
rafilou2003
fair enough
I mean I understood that bit
but the direct sum is complicating me
and also how do I find a
then replace it with a normal sum
is just normal sum where the intersection is zero vector
idk why they overcomplicate
rafilou2003
guess which one is easier to write
yes
(-1,1,1,a) orthogonal to T no?
yeah
with any vector of T
what about it
scalar product of (-1,1,1,a) with ANY vector of T is 0
have you thought about writing what scalar product of (-1,1,1,a) and (1,1,-1,1) is?
,w (-1,1,1,a)*(1,1,-1,1)
let me try
@burnt swift Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with how to start this

man what r u guys talking about