#help-26
1 messages · Page 126 of 1
yes
because that would give us the sum of 180
sum of obtuse angle
cuz its an obtuse angle
idk if thats why it works but yeah
i have to go to bed
but there will be more ppl that can help
<@&286206848099549185>
i have time to solve one more question
ill help u out
ok so basically similarity
if the triangles are similar that means the side lengths must be equal
AC/BA = CD/BE
9/5=p/4 (cross multiply)
oh
didnt get this part
thats basically what similarity means
i jst did a bit of research
cuz where im from australia i think its called congruence? but i dont remember
so for the first side with cross multiplication it should be 5p=36 p=7.2
so p is 7.2
and same thing for q
with cross multiplication and all
from where to get 36
9/5 =q+8/8
where do u get 9 from tho
5+4
=9cm
9cm is the entire length of side ABC
lmao
dw
9/5 =q+8/8
9x8=72
5 x (q+8) = 5(q+8)
14.4=5(q+8)
wait
mb
72 = 5(q+8)
oh'
in summary, ur jst cross multiplying because similarity means that the side lengths are proportional
@mortal mirage Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Astronauts who have just landed on a planet in the solar system observe that
a body thrown vertically into the air with an initial speed of 14.6 m/s
it takes 7.72 s to return to the ground. What planet are they on? (N.B.:
gravitational acceleration measured at the equator)
q=6.4
p=7.2
$x(t) = x_0 + v_0 t + \frac{1}{2} a t^2$ \
Since the body leaves and returns to the ground, $x(t) = 0$ when $t = 7.72s$ \
$0 = 0 + 14,6 \cdot 7,72 + \frac{1}{2} a \cdot (7,72)^2$ \
$0 = 14,6 \cdot 7,72 + \frac{1}{2} a \cdot (7,72)^2$ \
$0 = 112,712 + 29,7992 a$ \
$-112,712 = 29,7992 a$ \
$a = \frac{-112,712}{29,7992}$ \
$a \approx -3,78 \text{ m/s}^2$ \
alee
so we are on mercury right?
but its normal that ive got the gravitational acceleration negative ?
,calc 14.6 * 2/7.72
Result:
3.7823834196891
Coz I assumed the direction of a to be positive, as a result I had to take direction of initial velocity to be -14.6
In your case, you took the velocity to be 14.6
The - is only to indicate the direction, so dw
yes
Yes so I took the final velocity to be 0, the initial velocity to be -14.6 and time to be half of 7.72
I assumed "downward" to be positive
why you can do *2
Coz time taken to go up= time taken to come down
Np
Closed by @patent light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a function C(t)=C_0e^(kt) and if I find the derivative, I get C'(t)=kC_0e^(kt) or C'(t)=C(t)k, why is this? Why is it not C'(t)=ktC_0e^(kt)
The chain rule tells you that you multiply by the derivative of kt w.r.t. t
That's k
Not kt
can you explain in a simpler way
Let's simplify your problem: [C(t) = e^{kt}] and you think that [C'(t) = kt \cdot e^{kt}] instead of [C'(t) = k \cdot e^{kt},] right?
Kepe
Yes if its without C_0, then yes
oh is it because the t goes away when we find the derivative? for example if we say k=2 and t=x, and we find the derivative of 2x, then we get 2? is it the same principle
Yep
yes i get it now, thanks
np
@minor sand Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help to figure out how to prove this for a in R \ {0}
i know this works for a > 0, and for a < 0 it doesnt - but because there's an absolute value for the argument on the left hand side it does work here
i dont know how to do the proof without getting a conflict
a contradiction of some sort
Break it up into cases
Case 1: a > 0.
Case 2: a < 0.
how would i write it for case 2?
In that case the expression in the absolute value is negative, so it'll turn out to be -(a + 1/a)
i see, and i get what you're saying, but how do i write it? as in,
case 2: let a < 0:
...
because i cant say "let a = -a"
Yes, just "let a < 0". No need to do anything else
but i do need to take the minus sign out of a to do |-y|=|-1|*|y|=|y|
If a < 0, then |a| = -a
You can leave out the absolute value in place of a -
If $a < 0$, then $\big|a + \frac1a\big| = -\big(a + \frac1a\big)$
Kepe
i understand now
but wouldnt it be confusing for the reader?
i think there has to be a simpler way to show that
If you really want to, you can say that $a = -|a|$ if $a < 0$
Kepe
this is not what i mean, i meant something like if a < 0, let a = -b
but i guess your way is better
thank you mate
.close
Closed by @mystic siren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone check for me if this is correct?
@silk spire Has your question been resolved?
@silk spire Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @silk spire
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @hybrid pasture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just a quick question about u substitution, when taking something like 5x out of would that also take any x in the equation?
Like is this right?
well, no
u = 5x
u does not equal x, so you can't substitute u in place of x
but if you were to solve that equation for x
you'd get u/5 = x
and you could substitute that in
@knotty heron Has your question been resolved?
Close, you forgot to replace the x.
usec(u)/5
@knotty heron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
Hey im stuck on question 9
I think thats what you call provint something by induction in english
Im french
Here is what I tried
But I cant go to the point im looking to demonstrate
Just rotate it maybe
ahh much nicer(maybe)
i cant read french
pls wait
I need to démonstrate the relation
@lilac furnace Has your question been resolved?
bro the image aint clear
the question is to find I_n without recursive
@lilac furnace Has your question been resolved?
@lilac furnace Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
uh im gonna send an image of the question and give $ to whoever assists me
gimme a nice juicy answer and i give u money and a cute anime gif
preferably a correct one with a lil reasoning
(can i please say chop chop)
chop chop!
oh and the question just asks
"To the nearest tenth of a degree, what is the measure of angle PQJ?"
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
ohhhh
okay help me use my brain pls
thanks!
help me from the ground up :c
basically hold my hand
PLS PLS PLS PLS
this may help
@paper elk Has your question been resolved?
@paper elk Has your question been resolved?
sure :c
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Commands:
- clopen:
.close,.reopen - consensus:
.poll - factoids:
.tag - help:
.help - version:
.version
Type .help <command name> for more info on a command.
,calc 144*7
Result:
1008
you mean 1+sqrt7?
Yeah
i got the same
uh
I spent 10min
do you know $$\sqrt{(a+b)+2\sqrt{ab}}=\sqrt{a}+\sqrt{b}$$
Skill_Issue
like how i got that?
Yeah if possible
like how i got this or the answer?
Answer if possible
this can be derived from binomial theorem
you just find a and b in each of them and plug into the thing that i showed you
take both sides and square then, so you get (a+b)+2sqrtab=a+b+2ab
Ok
Skill_Issue ?
U online ?
ye
I gimme a sec
How do u solve this one ?
I am studying for a exam in Australia
For a school entrance
And was wondering
About the question
First, I suggest to write down the information you have
Ok
E is the mid-pt. of AD, AE = ED = 1
Yeah
Using Pythagoras
through those line you can fine CF since you have all the lines you got
ys
however, I'm still thinking of this, lol
i have no clue, but you can graph this question
I get it
you may want to find out the angle
Ok
im only year 8 :p
Actually?
ye
Funny one
The strategy is that when you find yourself having trouble to find the sides
Try to use the angle
wait
Have you learn sin, cos, tan?
i have an idea
Yeah
you first find the angle of AEB
SOHCAHTOA ?
Ok
through alternative angle, you can find the angle of EBC then use trigo identites to find the length of FC and BF
BEG is simmilar to BFC
Using substitution, you find the length of FE, by using area of triangle to calculate CEF and EDC and then sum up the areas, you get the area of CDEF
dont think you should use trig st class 9 :p
How do you proof
using this, you can find the area BFC, and it becomes trivial to find CDEF
they share a common angle B and they are both 90 deg triangles
You proof that those triangles are similar but not conguent
how
yes exactly
Those triangle are just similar, their sides may not be the same
CDEF=ABCD-ABE-BFC
yes
exactly
what's the next step then
we can find BE with pythag, which is sqrt5, so the ratio of the sides of BEG and BFC is sqrt5:2
Bruh the answers need a answers to understand
Idk
how
Exactly
this
Do u understand the solution ?
i already found it dude
look at what i wrote
I'm lookin rn
the ratio of the area is just the ratio of the sides squared, you get 5:4
Ok
What is 'Area of triangle CDA' ???
huh
Note that this question has multi-solution. So the answer is just an example for solving this question
i am anti trig
ye, I think the answer is more complicated
tbh while yes trig is a groundbreaking tool, it kinda sucks the life of any geometric problem thats on the borderline edge of not before trig
where did op go :(
@exotic pike Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @exotic pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Would saying 2 would produce even values only while 3 will produce only odd values with any given P sufficient ?
@vapid linden Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
any help w part iii)?
Yes
Yes of course
Can you write out 3
wait just
write it out like nromal?
cos im a bit confused for part iii
like how come there isnt a n-r or to the power of r
hmym yes
So what do you think
umm
Dude expand the sum
And then distribute the n choose r
wait
Yes it follows immediately
Can you just make it into two sums
The sum of ncr * 2r - sum of ncr * n
@worn gorge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
should i use hopital here or is there some easier method
use the expansions
uuuhh how
,w taylor series of e^x
replace x with the term there ^
ah
also i do have a doubt
in the expansion series
why do we sometimes not use the other terms
like sometimes we use till the power of 5
sometimes we dont
how many terms are used depends on the question
why tho
isnt it going on till infinity
But nevermind, don’t think that’s the right direction
in some questions there are terms with higher powers that we have to use the 5th term as well
but usually you wont have to
so we have here in the denominator x²
so well use the expansion till x² right?
the other terms vanish faster so they don't affect the problem, but for the first few terms, the speed at which they vanish is compared relative to other terms in the problem
also is this correct
@fresh ridge
i got this
wait sorry
therell be a square in the quadratic
so do i now apply hopital here @fresh ridge
@fervent briar Has your question been resolved?
i applied hopital
got this as final answer
but now how do i match the options
x tends to beta
if i put beta as the quadratic formula
its way too big of a calculation
@fresh ridge
sorry if the pinging is too much tho
need this answer
TwT
@cinder sequoia any help man?
honestly i would've just done l'hopital from the beginning
i'm not sure if the answer you've got here is right
oh
yeah so
now beta is a root
how do i simplify this
x tending to beta
the answer is 2(b² - 4ac)
so you'd get 2(2*beta + b)^2
i mean a here is 1
maybe try writing beta using the quadratic formula?
yeah and it simplifies quite easily actually
the -b/2 gets multiplied by the 2 and the -b cancels the +b
beta = -b/2 +/- sqrt(b^2 - 4c) / 2
from the quadratic formula
then 2beta = -b +/- sqrt(b^2 - 4c)
2beta + b = +/-sqrt(b^2 - 4c)
squaring that gives you b^2 - 4c
and then you double it
happy to help lol
.close
Closed by @fervent briar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Dihedral group (Dn) is a group of symmetries of the regular n-gon with order 2n (my class's definition). Recently, I remembered our lecturer mentioning something about a subgroup of Dn consisting of rotations in Dn and another consisting of reflections (not sure with this one). Is this true or did I mishear it? Also, if this is true, what are the standard symbols used to represent these subgroups?
this is true, but not the whole story, the dihedral group can be defined in terms of generators which are rotation and reflection
so in symbols $D_n=\langle r,s : r^n = s^2 = (sr)^2 = 1\rangle$
Bair
you can also interpret this as group actions acting on the state of the polygon
Oh that makes sense. So since these subgroups exist, do they have like a standard name to refer to them? (I.e. rotation subgroup). We're currently compiling a bunch of groups of different orders for an assignment. This one struck me since none of my peers also had an idea as to what to call it or what symbol to represent the subgroups.
well if i understand correctly, the two subgroups that you are referring to is the one generated by r and the one generated by s, and in that case if im not mistaken, the one generated by r is just the cyclic group of order n, and the one generated by s is the cyclic group of order 2
Oh yeah, now that you mention it, i almost forgot about that notation. Thanks!
Close
.close
Closed by @brittle parcel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what's the question?
How to get the volume of the green area After rotating around the x-axis
Using shell methods
Y = 3
Y = √(25-x²)
Do you know how to set up the integral?
That's the problem i know it but i get it wrong
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
2π × integration ( 3√(25-x²) ) from 3 to 5
$2\pi\int_3^5 3\sqrt{25-x^2}dx$?
SWR
Yes
that doesn't seem right
Why are you multiplying 3 and $\sqrt{25-x^2}$?
SWR
Is it wrong ?
Yes
$p(y)\ne 3$
kheerii
You should look back to the integral setup for shell integrals
So , what's the setup
I believe it is $2\pi\int_a^b xf(x)dx$. I imagine your $h$ means "height", which would make it $f(x)$ in my integral, but I have no idea what $p$ is supposed to mean in your image
SWR
So how to solve?
P is radius or something
SWR
I mean how to solve with this
Anybody here ?
This is for rotating around the y axis, not the x axis
It's not a problem
So how to solve the question with this
Convert your region into functions of y, instead of x, and change your bounds of integration to be bottom and top bounds, instead of left and right
It doesn't make difference
and change your bounds of integration to be bottom and top bounds, instead of left and right
1 to 4 ?
Or what do you mean
Broooo
What do you mean
What are the lower and upper bounds?
3 and 5 ?
??
yes
Okay but the answer is wrong
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
.
That's not the correct integral
I told you it's exactly the same
.
The bounds is the same
SWR
No it's supposed to be yg(y)
Just the variables is y
there you go
same form?
Bro you can just show me instead of asking or giving instructions
I really can't get what you mean
We spent an hour for worthless question
$y$ is just $y$ and $g(y)=\sqrt{25-y^2}$. You literally just have to plug that in
SWR
Ok so the integration is
2π integration √(25-y²) dy from 3 to 5 ?
What's the problem
is just y
Is just y
✅
Gonna try
yes
So the question here
Why the y in our question is just y
How to determine it
Like you did
I was thinking its y = 3
shell integration is just $2\pi\times$radius$\times$height. If you'r rotating about the x axis, then your cylinder has radius $y$ and height is cylinder height, which is actually "length" when revolving around x axis, and that would be $g(y)$
SWR
Ok i gonna make a lot change to the question to make sure that i got it
The volume gonna be
2π integration (y-2)√(25-y²) dy from 3 to 5
Right?
@stuck pawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stuck pawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
i have two circles. One has center A and other has center B. I know the radius of the two circles and the coordonates of the center points A and B. I know that AC = radius of first circle and BF = radius of second circle. I also know the length of AB (from euclidean distance), and that triangles ACF and CFB are right angled. I want to find the coordonates of the points C and F
any idea on how to approach it?
if I could find coordonates of point O, I could solve it
you don't need the coordinates of O
notice that there are 4 similar triangles in the picture
yes, they are, ACO, ADO, OEB, OFB
yeah
you know the length of AB
can you write AO and OB in terms of the angle phi, r1 and r2?
not sure I know how
$AO\cos\phi = AC = r_1$
maybe, BF/CA is BO/OA ?
kheerii
so AO = AC / cos phi?
yeah, so $AO=r_1 \sec\phi$
kheerii
similarly $BO=r_2\sec\phi$, so $AB=AO+OB=(r_1+r_2)\sec\phi$
kheerii
you know the value of AB, r1 and r2, which means you can find out the value of sec phi
but angle of phi is not given
maybe because OFB and OCA are similar triangles, then BO/AO = BF/AC ?maybe this way, since i know AC and BF, and I also know AB, I could find AO and OB?
...
oh
I didn't see that message
sorry 😄 😄
I think this will work
so I find out value of sec phi, then I can find AO and OB. How do I find coordonates of C and F in the end?
from sec phi you can find the value of phi
then you can directly find out the coordinates of C
all you need is the inclination of the line AB with the x axis
indeed
thanks a lot
just out of curiosity, what is this for?
I try to solve a programming problem
one second
I show you
so, given two points A and B in a 2d space and a set of circles, each with coordoantes of their center and their radius
find out the shortest path from A to B, without touching circles
so my idea was to find first the distance between A to tangent of each circle. This way I can find a point T, tangent of the circle, and its coordinates, using Pytagora
for example, given A, i can find T1
then, by using the idea you helped me with now, I find T2 and T3 coordonates
so coordonates of points C and F in our discussion
but how do you find T2
and then the arc from T1 to T2
T2 is C
i know coordonates of A and B, i know their radius
i am not really into geometry (i find it very interesting, but my level is not really that good) is my idea wrong?
T2 is C and T3 is F
so after that I apply Dijkstra. I get from A to T1, then from T1 I can go to other points of the same circle. Assuming there is T2( which is C) and T2' (which is D). Then I find the arc. so I have AT1 + arc(T1, T2) + T2T3. Or maybe AT1 + arc(T1, T2') + T2'T3
I am not sure it actually works
does it make sense to you?
@indigo scroll Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @indigo scroll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Unfortunately simple formulas tend to not work super well with changing interest rates
You have to rely more on the time value of money
Is that a concept you've been introduced to?
Alright
Can you tell me the value of that 20k after 3 years?
,calc 200001.03^21.02
Result:
21642.36
Alright
Now let's say the amount you're withdrawing is some number X (or whatever). Can you compute the value of these payments at time 3 years?
You withdraw some amount, X, after one year. If you were to invest it into a different account earning the same interest rate(s), what would it be worth in 3 years from today (so after 2 years in the account)?
(In terms of X)
That's not what I'm asking
The equivalent of that, you're not actually doing that
The time value of money states that the value of money in the future is related to the interest rate you could invest it at today
Right, so today the value of that 20k is just 20k
In one year, the value of that 20k is 20600
Sorry, I have to go, I'll try to find someone to step in
@dark pond Has your question been resolved?
@dark pond Has your question been resolved?
@dark pond Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The function above has no fixed point
So something from banachs fixpoint lemma is not fulfilled
So by def of the lemma I thought that f cant be a contraction on the interval
But im not sure if thats correct
Or is it because the only possible fixpoint can be 0 and this is not in the interval?
.close
Closed by @modern rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
can anyone help me with this vector field problem
I already confirmed it is conserved
then I tried to get the potential by integerating what I got so P=xy^2
q=xy^2+ye^(3z) w=3y1/3 e^(3z)
Am I correct ? if so how I can combine all what I've got to find the final ans of the potential?
@stark crater Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does it converge? if limit is 0 doesnt mean its inconclusive?
(question on the right, answer on the left)
limit is 0 is inconclusive by divergence series test yes, but
its an alternating series
if you have sum a_n from n=k to infinity for k some integer and a_n is alternating, and lim |a_n| as n goes to infinity is 0, then sum a_n from n=k to infinity will converge
i.e. if its inconclusive by divergence test, an alternating series will converge
i see thanks
In this section we will discuss using the Alternating Series Test to determine if an infinite series converges or diverges. The Alternating Series Test can be used only if the terms of the series alternate in sign. A proof of the Alternating Series Test is also given.
@quiet crag Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @quiet crag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
What does this command do?
Notification
@oak remnant Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Please only ping helpers once
I was told by the Bot that you can ping them every 15 minutes.
Please open your own help channel
@slim maple
Right, once.
@oak remnant Has your question been resolved?
@oak remnant Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@oak remnant Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @oak remnant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if the projection was reversed ( proj u on to v) would cos(theta) = |u| / scalar projection?
because cos = adj/hyp and the adj would be u and the scalar projection would be on v, the hypotenuse?
The picture would be the same but with the roles of v and u reversed, no?
yeah the picture would be the same but we would be projectiong u on to v
I believe the formula would still be the same with the variables switched from a video I watched but I dont understand why
As where you have v, you'd put u instead, and vice versa-
That said, I guess you could draw it as per what you've said 
Sorry I'm not sure im understanding my question might be confusing let me try and explain it better, so for example in this problem I followed the formula in green to get the scalar projection to get the correct answer, but im not seeing why that equation works because when I try to derive it I get a different equation which I written in purple
sorry forgot to post the problem
@grand solar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey ! I wanted to know how to operate a change of variable in a sum ! For exemple, i wanted to let i = 2k - n in this sum
So I changed the lower value and upper value
And got i = -n at the bottome and n at the top
So, this
However, the two summations are not equal, there are 2n terms in the second, compared to n terms in the first
Am I missing something ? Is there an other step to do ?
(2n + 1 and n + 1 respectively, btw)
the problem is that you arent getting all the i-values
you are only getting every second one
for example to get i=-n+1, you would have needed k=1/2
Yeah I see, so how do I only select the "possibe" values ?
you could write it as an extra condition. something like i+n even. but ehh
you probably just shouldnt do this variable change
there are other things you could do here
Hmm in fact
I simplified it a little bit
The function $k \rightarrow 2k-n$ is not bijective in the domain ${0, 1, ... n} \rightarrow {0, 1, ... n}$, so it's invalid.
It was the sum as k=0 goes to n of e^(ix(2k-n))
Xwtek
\to
I am trying to arrange it in a way so that a trig expression appears
given that you already have i in your formula, you definitely also shouldnt change the variable sum to i btw
What is the difference betwen \to and \rightarrow?
one is shorter
You can split a summation into two.
Well yeah, I had it change to t in ly paper but i here because i just deleted the complexe values
ok. just something to keep in mind
What are you thinking about ?
Oh like
A sumation that goes from 0 to n/2 and another that goes to n/2 to n, assuming that n is even?
No, I was thinking about a summation that goes from 0, 2, ... n and another that goes from 1, 3, ... n-1. But wait, what is the original? Because the question as it is, is actually a geometric sum
I would have done $e^{-n} \sum_{k=0}^n e^{2k}$ and then you have a geometric sum. no trig stuff tho
Denascite
Yeah but that's pretty much the point
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Okay so
I'm trying to cos^n(x) with a sum of αcos(βx)
I don't know if it's understandable written like that lmao
So I used euler identity, then Newton's binomial
And I'm trying to go back to a cos expression again
oh ok
not sure what you mean with newtons binomial
but roughly you just mean cos(nx)+i sin(nx)=e^(inx)=(e^(ix))^n = (cos(x)+i sin(x))^n ?
It's the formula to expand (a + b)^n
although well that solves cos(nx) in terms of cos^k(x). you want the other one
oh so binomial theorem. gotcha
Well no, I use the euler formula not Moivre's, so cos(x) = (e^ix + e^-ix)/2
Ohh my bad I'm french, we call it Newton's binomial here x)
thats not usually whats meant with eulers formula
in english anyway
e^ix = cosx+ i sin x is eulers formula in english
ok I see what you want
that seems a bit painful
Ohh okay we just learned this as the exponential form theorem, and we used "euler's identity" as the cos(x) and sin(x) definitions
meanwhile eulers identity is e^(i pi) + 1=0 in english
So I'm stuck with this
Okay thank's for the tip
Maybe I can like
Split the sum in two
One that goes from 0 to ceil(n/2)
And the other that goes from ceil(n/2) to n
btw what happened to the binomial coefficients
They merged
I had a e^(ixk) and a e^(-ix(n-k)
@wicked bay Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am not understanding a and b
<@&286206848099549185>
i dont understand b
how do i know how much is going left and how much is going right
you don't want x to be equal to 5, but as close as possible without equaling 5. Think of x=5 as an open dot on a graph
for letter b?
yeah
what do i even plug in and where
You're not exactly plugging in any numbers, just analyzing the table. Look at the f(x) values next to x=5. What do you notice about them?
thats for the f(x) values, yes.
you can look at both. just don't look at x=5. while x=5 is associated with the limit, it won't be equal to 5. try to see what f(x) is approaching from both sides of the table.
check a value of x and see if the f(x) values on both sides approaches a single value. Is there one single value x approaches?
you can really check any value of x, but try to check the value that seems most likely to approach a number
i got left side 3 and right side -1/3
For example, as x approaches 4, its not clear as to which number f(x) is approaching.
you're mainly analyzing f(x) to see what number it approaches, yes.
oh i see
i think im getting the gist of it but the tables are always confusing
what about for a. i am pretty sure i know how do it
i just plug in the approaching number right?
you have to simplify the fraction first
Hi
hello
factor out the bottom and cancel out terms
and if the thing is different from the limiting function it doesnt exist right?
only if there isn't a set value x is approaching. For example, as x approaches 1, its undefined because the denominator is 0.
i see alright
thank you pizzaboy
for helpinig me, i was trying to understand it for a while
yep
@formal jetty Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
really quick question, are the processes of implicit differentiation and partial differentiation interchangeable (using the formula dy/dx = - partial derivative wrt x/partial derivative wrt y), i don't know how to properly type it
not sure if that’s always true
we typically use partial derivatives for functions that take in multiple variables as an input
implicit differentiation is taking the fact that y is a function of x
not really giving us a function that depends on x and y
yeah it was mainly something i was thinking about because although it's generally more complex to do, i couldn't think of a counterexample
ie. you can define implicit differentiation problems as a function of x and y and then use partial differentiation
@quaint badge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I wrote a National Benchmark Test yesterday for a university, and came across this question. I've been stuck on it since, and to make it even harder (in case the text is not clear) you cannot solve for "x" or "y" is values (if you have to solve them, then I guess the question is flawed). I would really appreciate help with this apparent simultaneous equation!
$\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}=\frac{x+y}{xy}$
SWR
$\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}=\frac{x+y}{5}$
ZeroNewt
I got stuck here, no further
What is $(x+y)^2$?
SWR
$(x^2 + 2xy + y^2)$
ZeroNewt
Yup. There you go
so what do you end up with?
Not quite. So close, but not quite
4?
I am struggling here, this is what 48 hours of maths does to the brain
Well, the sum of this is 25?
Okay, so (x+y)²=25, so what can x+y be?
close
What else can x+y be?
-5?
This subject is the bane of my existence🥲
Thank you so much 🙏 Have a blessed day/night
.close
Closed by @hot walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Determine a system of equations that yields the solution $(2s, s + 1, s -2)$ with free variable $s$.
I'd do this by converting 2s to t, then I can deal with t like it's x_1
Is there another way too?
not sure what you mean by that
first I would remove the +1 and -2
so you just have s*(2,1,1)
so you want a homogenous system which has that as solution
now what can you say about the first row of that system
@shut obsidian Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
How can you just remove them
You mean write it as (2s, s, s) + (0, 1, -2)?
ok
you get the first part from finding a system Ax=0
and then by choosing b in Ax=b you can get the second part
We want A * ((2s, s, s) + (0, 1, -2)) = 0, so A * (2s, s, s) = -A * (0, 1, -2)
Yeah
If that's what you mean
no
I mean (2s, s + 1, s - 2) is the same as (t, t/2 + 1, t/2 - 2). Now I can directly give you a system to that:
$x_2 = \frac{x_1}{2} + 1$ \ $x_3 = \frac{x_1}{2} - 2$
Kepe
oh that. yes that works
But for this method, we need one entry with a factor of 1 in the tuple
So I was asking if there is a more direct approach maybe
i'm not sure why replacing with t was necessary 
you might as well say x_1 = 2s, x_2 = x_1/2 + 1, x_3 = x_1/2 - 2 directly
It feels weird to choose 2s as a free variable
Oh, true..
well it doesn't really matter what is and isn't a free variable
as long as you get the same constraints
Thanks a lot, then I'll just go with this method
.close
Closed by @shut obsidian
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Wait
id say you should consider what denascite was saying though
.reopen
✅
because it's important to understand conceptually
How is this a valid system of equations?
Oh, only the last two
well x_1 is free there essentially
Yeah, you omit the x_1 = 2s
You only give x_2 = x_1/2, x_3 = x_1/2 - 2 as your solution
Thanks
it should be A(s(2,1,1) + (0,1,-2)) = b
and if (2,1,1) is in the kernel of A, you get A(0,1,-2) = b
in fact it is necessary for (2,1,1) to be in the kernel of A
different way to see it, if you choose s=0 then you need A(0,1,-2)=b
which you can then subtract from both sides of this