#help-26
1 messages · Page 94 of 1
what if in a parallel universe there were no options?
it worked, thanks a lot
thank you to kyanite too for poor man's strats
np
yeah agreed
wouldn't recommend doing that for exercises and all though, since there's no point
yeah but what about the ⭐ learning⭐
learning doesn't matter in exams
just do the integration properly when you get home
but yeah learning the integration is important i fully agree
Kya yaar shikhar
jee nikal lenge aur kya
gupta ji aapne disappoint kardiya
usually doing the integration is faster
samajhdari khoon mai chalti hai bhai inlog ke
nah bro
practice se bas
College mein ho kya?
yeah plus they give definite integrals mostly to prevent differentiators
exactly
no 11th
coaching?
im in 9th class
in 9th foundation coaching
@restive steeple Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @restive steeple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I solve an equation that doesn't have a fixed point or accuracey ?
Are you aware of the rational roots theorem?
no
You can try guessing a root
If you know this theorem you will know what guesses to make
but how does it end ?
I did
Did you get any?
wait
Yh that's right
my bad
didn't pay attention
then what ?
And it's 2 not 1
So it's x = 7/2x - 1/x^2 ok
I'm required to do it this way
oh
We know
Do I just assume a root ?
Yeah make a guess
ok
Unfortunately someone already spoiled it
,calc (0.5+(3.5/0.5-1/(0.25)))/2
Result:
1.75
Oops sorry wrong calculation
yh
,calc 3.5/0.5-1/(0.25)
Result:
3
Okay yes
now what
Result:
1.0555555555556
Find x3 and x4, x5,... till you get |x(n)-x(n-1)|<0.001 like they asked here
So this is not different from the equations that have a starting point ?
What does that mean?
You chose the starting point to be 1
They chose the starting point to be 0.5
The starting point(x1) is a guess that you make
You guessed 1
Closed by @violet hornet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am having a doubt about this example from my class
T(p)=d/dx((x-1)p) is the linear map from P2(C)->P2(C)
and we're trying to find its eigenvalues/eigenvectors
I am confused why we are somewhat randomly considering the vector v=x^2
Is there a reason?
It is a screenshot from the panapto camera, which is a very bad camera
ahh
Apologies
makes sense
I can translate
let v=x^2
Tv=...
T^2v=..
T^3v=..
do the row reduction to get the linear combination of T, T^2, T^3 and I that equals 0
it turns out it is (T-3I)(T-2I)(T-I)v=0
once factored
and now my sir is claiming that, we just substitute v one by one to figure out what the eigenvalue is
if (T-I)v=0 then it is 1
if not substitute into the next and so on
but my doubt is about why does v=x^2?
my sir?
my ma'am*
more confused lol
(T-3I)(T-2I)(T-I)v=0 tells you that at least one of T-3I or T-2I or T-I fails to be injective
so 1 or 2 or 3 is an eigenvalue
right
right
for v=x^2 being the eigenvector
but why did we randomly have v=x^2 to begin with
if (T-I)v = 0 then boom 1 is an eigenvalue and v is an eigenvector associated with 1
I understand that part of it
i think there's nothing magical about working with x^2
for any nonzero v, you could consider
v, Tv, T^2 v, T^3 v
a list of four vectors in a 3 dimensional space
yes
hence linearly dependent
I agree
Will that not imply any arbitrary v is an eigenvector though? Which surely can't be true
no it won't
refer back to this: (T-3I)(T-2I)(T-I)v=0
if (T-I)v is not zero, then we proceed:
either (T-2I)(T-I)v = 0
in which case 2 is an eigenvalue with (T-I)v an associated eigenvector
or
3 is an eigenvalue with (T-2I)(T-I)v an associated eigenvector
ah and (T-I) like "adjusts" v into being the eigenvector we're guaranteed?
well it adjusts you to something that might be an eigenvector
one of the following has to be an eigenvector:
v
(T-I)v
(T-2I)v
i think that's true
amazing
anything nonzero would work i think
don't quote me on that, check it for yourself to be sure
gosh I fucking wish my maths sir would teach me matrix algebra for hours
I'll check it out
ty
.close
Closed by @noble laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
seems right, it does seem like this process will only ever give us one eigenvalue/eigenvector though, is that right?
What about the other ones 
honestly i would just find the matrix of the map wrt the standard basis
yea, it's not immediately obvious how to coax this process into revealing other eigenvalues/eigenvectors
My only issue with this is then I am not allowed to use a determinant to solve T-lambda I = 0
I think if we try v=x, v=C
why not lmao thats stupid
because we are using Axler and my prof wont let us use determinants for anything because we haven't introduced nor proven any determinant facts
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.well then yeah i would just do the same thing with x and 1
. it just seems particular to only this map, and just because 1, x, x^2 form a basis for P_2(R) and maybe it works out here, we could've had other less obvious basis, but maybe the key is like, so long as you're plugging in a vector not in the span of other ones you've already tried you will get a new eigenvector?
oh or perhaps alternatively since all these maps commute you can just change the order and probably get new evectors
how do we know they commute
T commutes with itself and with any scalar multiple of the identity
use that and distributivity
i think if you did go ahead and do two other LI vectors you might just get the same thing but in a different order
or maybe the poly is lower degree idk
hm this is really dumb no offense to axler but lemme just use a little bit of determinants
or don't make me compute eigenvalues
well yes do v =1 lol
yea it seems like just rearranging the product you can re-use the same v each time
idk why my ma'am would never give any of these details
did she not finish the question?
like she just found one evector and called it quits?
i'm not sure if with this method you're guaranteed to get a polynomial whose factors cover all the eigenvalues
like this might just divide the minimal polynomial as opposed to being the minimal polynomial
yes actually
yeah thats definitely true bungo bc of v=1
yea
so you may need to repeat it, possibly n times (n the dimension of the space), with v equal to different basis vectors
each time with L.I vectors?
its just interesting that you do get all the evalues in this case by doing it with x^2
neccessarily the basis vectors or just L.I?
yea is that just a quirk of this particular linear map?
amounts to the same thing really, any n LI vectors is a basis
My ma'am has a thing for maps with eigenvalues 1,2,3,4,5,....
Hi ! Can I have some help here
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
ocupado
what was your ma'am's intent with this example, just showing how to find an eigenvalue/eigenvector pair?
Unfortunately not for this class
I believe so yes
She is not my most organized or clear maam of all time
I want some recommendation books
I want you to leave my doubt channel
Anyways thanks bungo and ZAC I’ll get back to my linear algebra in about an hour after these office hours
.close
Closed by @noble laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can somebody explain the solution to me? Why did they put both expressions in the integral?
@north river Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@north river Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @north river
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
will you please help me understand how the order of the compression and shift transformation on f(bx - h) works and why it is important? i can understand that (x+h)/b but when i change it to the expression (x/b + h/b) im not sure if the order of transformation matters?
will you please help me understand how the order of the compression and shift transformation on f(bx - h) works and why it is important? i can understand that (x+h)/b but when i change it to the expression (x/b + h/b) im not sure if the order of transformation matters?
it comes from what happens when you solve for x =
so for f(bx-h) you go from bx-h=[ ] to x=([ ]+h)/b
how you represent that last part doesn't matter
(f(x)+h)/b that better?
yea I'll work with that
it's better written as 1/b*f(x) + h/b
like fully simplified
ok
well
my question is this
having f(x)/b + h/b
does it matter wether or not the compression or shift is performed first?
im concerned its different for verticsal versus horizontal
because one is domain and one is range
im thinking hard
it's always compression then shift
just because of how it's "standard" to write things as y=ax+b
you multiply then add
ok, check out this photo i took from openstax, it is saying to do a shift first... any clues as to maybe how they are representing the transformations or maybe anything::::
it's all confusing because sometimes it's going backwards haha
lol
ive been trying to litteraly figure this out for a day or two i really think this is challenging my thinking hahaha
like usually I'd just rewrite f(bx-h) into f(b(x-h)) form when I'm thinking about the graph, but this image is sort of telling you to just memorize both cases
b(x-h/b) ?
right
that gives the same transformations as the image
just a different way of looking
oh ok i see what ur saying about memorize both ways
one each way of using order of the transformations?
just to learn one way of compressing then shift, then a way to shift then compress?
yeah that seems like the gold standard.. hey thanks captain! btw i saw u on here earlier u put a lot of time in this? go karma! lol cya thanks !
.close
Closed by @eager hamlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i do question d
Closed by @noble laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i closed my old one
Do not close and reopen a channel to post the same question
bruh
l' hopital would be ashamed of u
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm a little rusty with my high school math, my son had a test and he left this question blank. The work written down is by the teacher and when I put it in my calculator I get 15 for width... which makes length zero. That makes no sense, kids can't play in zero space haha. Where did I go wrong?
not sure what you're plugging into but to finish the work shown, you take the derivative of that bottom equation and set it equal to 0 to find the maximum
ohhh, i found the x-intercept, why the maximum?
like here's the graph of A=30w-2w^2
and the thing about maximums/minimums is that the derivative there is 0, so that's what we use to find them
Closed by @cyan lantern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need calc help bro
so for this question, I found the first deriviative then i set it to zero
and i got the wrong answer
how would i do it
Maximum velocity, not the distance
So you need to put zero for the double derivative
Yea

and 1 idk
i didnt calculate 1
@radiant sparrow
even for this one, i tried getting the first dervitive then setting it to zero and it didnt work
put that =0
ill just do that one later
how would you do the second qusestion
this one
i have the derviative of cost then i basically set itto 0 and solve
@ashen rose Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there a way to prove that the limit of x^y as x and y both approach zero equals 1? not sure if i'd be wrong here since i dont have a lot of background on multivariable calculus, but would it work to just approximate it with the limit as x approaches 0 of x^x?
If this limit is considered true, then why is 0^0 sometimes considered undefined?
there is usually no reason to leave it undefined
@twin heath Has your question been resolved?
but why would it be 1? the way ive seen x^0 defined is by dividing x^1 by x to get x^0. But 0/0 is clearly indeterminate, so 0^0 has to be proven by something else, right?
"indeterminate form" is just a limit computation phrase and how limits work often motivative how you define expressions but they don't have to
the value of $$\lim_{(x,y)\to(0,0)}x^y$$ is its own thing that can be computed. $0^0$ is its own thing that you choose how you define
chmonkey #1 simp
there isn't in any choice in what the limit is once you define limits and a^b with nonzero a,b
but 0^0 is something you define
just as you choose how a^b for nonzero a,b is defined
and what a limit is
you should not look at like the value of 0^0 is "discovered" by computing that limit
i know 0^0 is something that you can just define, but the value that it's given still has to be a reasonable value. i just want to know why we can just define it as 1, but cant define 0/0
you can define 0/0 but it's pointless
it won't behave like division
no matter what you try to define it as
you can't define it if you require that it has the characteristic property that division by nonzero numbers has
which, morally, you should
right but i could say that 0^x is always equal to 0 or is undefined and that any x^0 is equal to 1
back to this
how limits work don't need to determine how you define expressions
but 0/0 is considered indeterminate because of limits :(
because it's weird to have one considered indeterminate and the other to have a given value when they're literally the same thing
are 0^0 and 0/0 not the same expression
??????
i think
no, one has a ^ and the other has a /
my brain is probably doing smth wrong
this might might be the wrong way to think about it but
if raising an exponent by one is multiplying by that number
then decreasing it by one is dividing it
then x^0 is equal to x^1/x^1
or x/x
as a reason for why 0^0 and 0/0 are the same?
i meannnnnn
Yeah??? maybe??
you're applying "rules" where you shouldn't be. the fact you're thinking of is not
x^m/x^n = x^(m-n)
because that doesn't make sense as a mathematical statement. rather, it's
x^m/x^n = x^(m-n) for any x > 0, and m and n any real numbers
this is not your fault really, lack of quantifiers is a devastating issue in math education
okay i think i kind of see why but
still a bit weird that one's defined and one isnt when they can both equal the same values depending on how you want to define it
but it works ig
.close
Closed by @twin heath
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This question is not exactly what I need at the moment as i have completely missed the 'exact form' and pi section. What simpler/earlier areas of math do you recommend I study first to understand questions of this type?
whats the question asking you?
Use a trapezium to find each area under the curve.
look up videos on the trapezoidal rule
i understand the trapezoidal rule, but i mean alot simpler, like this type of stuff
like pi and roots
@native vale Has your question been resolved?
@native vale Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @native vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Where does your -40 come from?
Maybe I'm slow but I don't think -1/0.026 gives -40 :/
@dark pond Has your question been resolved?
No worries, best of luck 😊
Closed by @dark pond
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey im up to the first question I am confused how to do this
I understand rational root theorum im just not sure how to use it to help factorise these
do you want to find 3 factors or just a single factor
I can help with this
Try finding a single factor by applying the rational root theorem
but Im not sure what the rational root theorem is,
it seems way too complicated for something as easy as this
im not sure just whatever the quesstion wants

compute the roots via RRT and then represent in the simplified form
seems too complicated
solve for p or q
and just use either
wait no
we arent find a factor we have to factorise it
nvm im confused again
p is either positive or negative factor of the constant term a_0
same for q but it is the factor of the leading coefficient a_n
okay so how do I figure out which is which
you gotta then test the possible p/q values in respective polynomial p(x) if it evaluates to zero then you've found a root!
how do i sub in p and q
wait
omg thats so much trial and error
so try all values of p till we get 0
not p and q the fraction p/q
its indeed a tedious task but very useful in high degree polynomials
for ex part 1 has possibilities ±(3/2) , ±(5/2)
yeah
you have to try
test out everything
altho you could analyse for some p/q
my brain is gonna get too jumbled if I do that
if you need further help ping me!
Be a smartass check for the signs (+,-). in p(x) ex if all are positive then no negative possibility is viable root. Hope it helps
okay thank you ill leave this open and lyk if I get it
okay
@lofty salmon it took a bit
but i found f(3/2) = 0
what do i do next to factorise the polynomial
you need to find 2 more
a cubic equation has 3 roots
,tex ```tex
\begin{align*}
\text{Given cubic polynomial: } & ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d \
\text{Factorized form: } & (px + q)(rx^2 + sx + t)
\end{align*}
ℕaive
where is r s and t coming from
a cubic polynomial is factorized into 2 simplified polynomials that are linear and quadratic.
those are coefficients that you need to determine based on the specific cubic polynomial you are dealing with
yup
Closed by @lunar merlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
You find these values through methods like synthetic division or hit and trial
if you find any 1 root
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Ysaac is standing on the origin of a 2-dimensional cartesian plane. Suddenly, Ysaac is running away from his problems with a rate of 2 units/s in a direction determined by y=2x. Exactly 2 seconds after Ysaac started running, Some random guy also starts running away from Ysaac’s problems at the same speed as Ysaac but in the direction determined by y=x. If Ysaac’s problems stay at the origin point of the cartesian plane, calculate the equation for the rate of change of the distance between Ysaac and Some random guy. Assume Some random guy stands and moves on the same plane and quadrant as Ysaac.
I have made a question I cannot solve
how does one solve a rate of change question
hey there
"some random guy also starts running away from ysaac's problems" 💀
I'm back with another great problem I made and I cannot solve
ikr, my name is weird
do I have to view y=2x as the x-axis
that'd be tedious but like it'd work I think
ain't no way....
$\frac{\dd\left(\sqrt{\left(x_{Y}-x_{R}\right)^{2}+\left(y_{Y}-y_{R}\right)^{2}}\right)}{\dd x}$
ren
bro wifi is making the timing super peccable
"peccable"
yes
impeccable is a word meaning perfect, therefor peccable
ik
how do I do this 😭
yr=xr, yy=2xy
(xy-xr)^2+(2xy-xr)^2
5(xy)^2-5xyxr+2(xr)^2
tf??
idk I just placed it in ¯_(ツ)_/¯
ok hang on
y_Y = y of ysaac = 2x_y (the x of ysaac)
y_r = y of rando = x_r (the x of rando)
now, since we know that x_r = x_y - 2
just sub it in
im 70% sure this is the way to go
but they're moving 2 units per second
in the line, not in the x-axis sense '<'
well
just assume x = time parameter
and btw Ysaac is moving at 2u/s, since the derivative of 2x is 2
ohhhhh I've been thinking from a vector sense
nah I'm dying
fax
so how do I solve this '<'
i just told you
$\frac{\dd\left(\sqrt{\left(x_{Y}-\left(x_{Y}-2\right)\right)^{2}+\left(2x_{Y}-\left(x_{Y}-2\right)\right)^{2}}\right)}{\dd x_Y}$ fairly certain this is what you need to do
ren
75% sure
mm hmm, now I have 0 knowledge on doing rate of change questions, so now how do I do this '<'
(5(xy)^2-5xyxr+2(xr)^2)^(1/2)?
(xy^2+4xy+8)^(1/2)
I'm stupid
do I just differentiate that?
there's no way it's that simple
💀
I'VE BEEN QUESTIONING MY KNOWLEDGE IN MATH FOR 3 HOURS
(xy+2)/(sqrt(xy^2+4xy+8)
it doesn't work 
ok naut
i have no idea what ur saying
USE LATEX
take smth from desmos and copy the mess here
give me the simplified version of this; remember that x_r = x_y - 2
@wild brook ??
@wild brook bro ded?
yes
$\frac{d\left(\sqrt{\left(2\right)^{2}+\left(x_{Y}+2\right)^{2}}\right)}{dx_{Y}}$
ren
simplifies to this
this is the simplified verson
yeah
$\frac{d\left(\sqrt{8+x_{Y}^{2}+4x_{Y}}\right)}{dx_{Y}}$
ren
,w differentiate sqrt (x^2 + 4x + 8)
supposedly
but if you place a value it doesn't really do the distance '<'
ren
@wild brook
wait
I mean it doesn't find the distance
formula for the distance
or preferably a more solvable rate of change problem
i mean
this is distance b/w ysaac and rando
can't do that for ya
Closed by @wild brook
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
alr, DM me
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I calculate cosα when sinα = –0.6 and α is a fourth quadrant angle.
do u know sin37degrees
nope
(sinx)^2 + (cosx)^2 = 1
wait actually there is another way
do u know what sinx stands for
nope
oh yeah
u dont know?
i know now
0.6 =6/10 = 3/5
so draw a right triangle with hypotenuse 5 and one sidee 3 and fnd other side ussing pythagoras theorem
and then mark theta
and find cos theta using similar definition
do you know SOH CAH TOA
and since ur given angle is in 4th quadrant, cos wud be -ve
i feel like i should know that but english really isnt my native language
ive been studying math in a foreign language all my life
oh ok then i guess you must have whatever language memory device
Hi can someone teach me 2.3 polynomial identities
@frail bay Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @frail bay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help with e) 2
<@&286206848099549185>
looks similar with 1)
With one I got 23
As an answer
Did you try solving using the same ideea?
Imagine that you would amplify with a (-1) and then just add and remove what you have extra
if it makes any sense
from what I believe I can t tell you the exact solution
What is the solution
<@&286206848099549185>
it seems so simple
like 7th grade
but I ve been busting my head for a little more than 10 minutes
Bro, I feel you
what grade is this in?
11
I don't think you really solve for a. I think you are trying to find out what e) 2 would equal to
The result is 23
to do part E you kind of have to
the answer is very easy to find once you do that
When I do what?
a + 1/a = 23
a - 1/a = the thing you're trying to find
(what happens when you add these equations together?)
so to answer the question, just solve for a
This guy is right
I do not know
How do I solve for a
sqrt(a) + 1/sqrt(a) = 5
multiply both sides by sqrt(a)
Isn't this the answer for e) 1
But why 5?
??
OK, so the answer is 25?
no
do you know what it means to "multiply both sides by sqrt(a)"
@patent dome yes or no
Yes
try to do it
no
this equation
It is that equation
the equation i give you is the one the problem gives you
that is where you solve for a
not this
Can please just show me how it should be done
note sqrt(a) with a t
and substitute
then you can solve for a
rewrite the equation
as followed
Quadratic formula?
t will be the value of sqr of a
ofc
a1 should be (23-5sqrt(21))/2
a2 should be (23+5sqrt(21))/2
check which ones respects the condition
sqrt(a)-1/sqrt(a)>0
How did you get this?
How did you get 5sqrt(21)
Because it's the answer for e) 2
FUCK I GETT IT Now!!! Sorry about being so stupid and thank you
now that you get it this should explain
happy that I was able to help, keep on grinding
@patent dome Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need clarification pls
for example suppose f(x) = x [1,2]. Does the derivative at x = 2 exist??? because according to the derivative formula we need (2+h)-2, but 2+h would be greater than 2??
f(x) = x/x?
oops
no i think y = x from the domain
[1,2]
and think of it this way
derivative is your instantaneous rate of change
So what's stopping you from carrying out (2+h) - 2?
It's not really a big deal that one is larger
what would the instantaneous rate of change be at x = 2
f(2+h) isn't in the domain of f
if h > 0
Ah yeah, I see. Then indeed that will stop you entirely
Closed by @stone verge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Pwease help 🥺
y=sqrt(x), as a parent function. Looks something like this
For A, it's reflected across the y axis, so we would negate what's inside the square root.
So A would be y=sqrt(-x)
B has a translation left 3, so we'd have to do the opposite and add 3 to x inside of the square root. So it would be y=sqrt(x+3)
C has a reflection across the x axis, so we have to negative the entire square root. It also has a translation up 4 units, so we need to add outside the square root. So will both transformations in mind, we'd write y=-sqrt(x) + 4
I hope that helps, I'm not the best teacher 
@rough girder Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, I have $||u||=3$ and $||v||=2$ and $\theta=\frac{\pi}{3}$. What is $u+v$?
Totalani
I know you can use $||u+v||^{2}=(u+v)\cdot(u+v)$ but I think im missing something
Totalani
book says sqrt(19) but im not getting that
@glacial pumice Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @glacial pumice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i go about solving this
@vocal token Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @vocal token
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi I need help if I solved this correctly
How you can say that cos(x) = x?
1.415/4 is not 0.285 🤔
mb thats 1.14159
He's just doing substitution which might cause problems but was fine
What's more you solve for cos(x) not for x
our course we can let cosx be temporarily x
ick... use "u" instead
Better not for harder questions.. Lol
huh
you wanna use diff variables bud
its what the course instructed
fine let x = cos(\theta)
Weird but whatever
I mean.. you can... but it's too easy to get confused on which "x" you're working with
then the course wanted them to use small angle approximation
Global/local variable conflict
that's what I'm getting with cos(x) = x
I c..
is the result correct
x is not 0.29
what should i do then
U found the range for cos x but not real x
What u need to do is cos inverse to find x
right i move cos to right then would be arccos 0.28540
Yes
Which is?
@visual dome Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @visual dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this correct?
@lament fractal Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@lament fractal Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @lament fractal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
well what was your answer?
maybe you put 2 ^ after 6^x ?
it looks like that a little bit
but the math is correct
$\ln\left(6\right)\left(2x+8\right){\cdot}6^{x^2+8x}$
tobi
i think its a problem with the answer key
Closed by @eager orbit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone help w this?
Would it be 3(sqrt)2 - 2
Instead of plus/minus
<@&286206848099549185>
Closed by @hasty surge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with the above please
i understand that but no one has helped me since the first time i pinged
.
i came here looking for help and my work should not take to lo long
if you could help me wrap it up that would be awesome
im just here to tell you this, cuz your pings annoyed me so im going now and wish you for someone to help you!
@icy iris Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey could someone help me solve the inverse of this
Make f(t) y
Then switch x and y
And solve for y
I might be able to do this in my head rq
What’s the rule to isolate the exponential again?
What do you mean?
👍
I think you just write the formula
@lofty hearth Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lofty hearth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im just here to check if I did my work right, was gone for a week and im struggling to grasp the concept
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
no
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys im convinced this is impossible
what have you tried?
@cursive mango Has your question been resolved?
briefly tried integrating by y first, and then i was gonna try to maybe substitute u for 1+xy
gave up and tried an online calculator and it couldnt do it
that seems like a fine approach
Closed by @cursive mango
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If ACO wasn't iscoseles and ADO was iscoseles would C be 50°, D be 20°, O1 be 140° and O2 be 60°
If so what would the reasons be for each one
Someone please just answer my question
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
O2 should be 40 degrees not 60
If ADO is isoceles then angle D must be the same as angle A making it 20 degrees
sum of all angles in a triangle must be 180 therefore angle ADO is 140
Again for triangle ACO, we have a 90 degrees at A and 20 degrees at D, so angle C will be 70
O1 is same as angle AOD making it 140
O2 is 40 since O1 + 02 = 180
@grim urchin
Thank you
If they asked to give a reason for the statement for C, D, O1 and O2 what would I say for each of them then
for D you can reason that the two equal angles must be acute therefore D = A
the value of C is a result of angle sum property
O1 and O2 are results of vertically opposite angles
Thanks so much
You’re welcome
.close
Closed by @grim urchin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I want to discuss m. So basically the answer I'm supposed to get is 0,
My first step is to just simplify what is actually standing here, so I did so.
My first step:
((Sin A)/(-cos A)) + ((-sin A)/(cos A))
High school math, sorry.
Which question
M
Yes.
It can be written as cos (180+(180+A))
I'm supposed to simplify it as cosA
The letters represent which one is positive
yess
this one
yes so lets say angle a is somewhere between 0 to 90 degrees
nvm
Can you explain your first step?
and let us simplify sin (A - 540)
Ok so we're at 360 degrees. So adding a sharp angle(A) will put us in the 1st quarter which is where cos is positive
everything is positive in the first quadrant
I just simplified the equations sorry guys English isn't my home language
Exactly hence the A for all
S for sin
T for tan
