#help-26
1 messages · Page 65 of 1
G. Spark
$(5*12)^a = 5^a * 12^a = 3$
G. Spark
@dusk sigil Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You can rewrite the integrand as (T^1.0906)^(-3) = T^(-1.0906*3) = T^(-3.2718)
Then it's just the exponent rule for integration
int(x^a)dx = (1/(a+1))x^(a+1)
mind giving me numerical example
forgot about the +1 stuff. slowly coming to me
for example, int(x^3)dx = (1/(3+1))x^(3+1) +C = (1/4)x^4 +C
add 1 to power then divide by power
yup, it's the reverse of the exponent rule for derivatives
yh i remember that. now about 80 percent confident on this
see, ur saying initally i move all stuff bottom to top. do integral stuff yet all shit ends bottom
is that cause if it stayed top only diff would be power would be neagtvie
Yes
gotcha. thanks pal. tiktok fried maa brain
on the recovery. maths better 5 yr ago
No problem! good luck
@native nova Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
number 50
ill translate hold on
ABCD is a parallelogram
Points F , E are the middle of DC , AB
Prove Sdebf = Sade + Sbcf
yes
Draw the line EF and show triangles AED and DEF are congruent, and BFC and FEB are congruent (in fact, all 4 triangles wouldbe congruent to each other)
can you elaborate as to why i need to draw the line EF?
for triangles DEF and EFB
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @twilit warren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
NGL idek how to graph cos(x)
Graph the original graph, find the new period, amplitude, and midline!
Midline is at -2, the amplitude is 6, and the period is 8
Idk how to graph the original
Wat other point is there
Idk where to put the point to get to the original
@neon iron
So we have a y intercept of 1
The nearest x intercepts of the y intercepts original graph are -π/2 and π/2
Does this look right
@neon iron
<@&286206848099549185>
@limpid flame Has your question been resolved?
Ty
.close
Closed by @limpid flame
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
In the first minute he traveled one fourth the total distance to the North Pole. In the second minute he traveled one third the remaining distance. In the 3rd minute he covered one fourth the remainder, and in the fourth minute he covered one-half the distance left. By then he had 300 miles LEFT.
By then, how many miles had Santa TRAVELLED?
Here.
Im dumb at this type of math
Pls help
.close
Closed by @ocean loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
In the first minute he traveled one fourth the total distance to the North Pole. In the second minute he traveled one third the remaining distance. In the 3rd minute he covered one fourth the remainder, and in the fourth minute he covered one-half the distance left. By then he had 300 miles LEFT.
By then, how many miles had Santa TRAVELLED?
What did you try?
@ocean loom Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Where do we get the name $\sigma$-ring from?
Zander
@floral rampart Has your question been resolved?
We use this term in measure theory and, consequently, in modern probability theory
Yes, but I guess why is it called the way it is
Like sure, we have a ring of sets or whatever
But why sigma?
And even this, why did we agree on the word "ring"
It seems like some kind of distributive lattice
there is also sigma - field
and
sigma - algebra
those names inherit asbtract algebra terms
Yes, sure, but even these do not live up to the algebraic terms they are given: an algebra over a set is not an algebra over a ring
My issue is why do these names still get used?
So I guess, my issue may be with universal algebra, not say measure theory
But at the end of the day, measure theory predates universal algebra
Not well, though. This is my issue
you know, i have accepted those various definitions, such an automatic approach an di know those definitions etc, but i am not interested to much in
the etymology of those words 🙂 maybe we wud need to dig in math literatus so much to find , assume first article contains such terms. do you bother their etymology? or you search explanation why those terms are different in other branches?
well, when I hear the word ring of set, I want to think about rings, not lattices perse
i used that at the begining since it is the biggest offender of the issue
in the history of mathematics, we have a lot of terms that originated, it seems in the wrong way, but over the years, they have become accepted and no one wants to change it now 🙂
my initial thought was like: oh we like to do measure theory at first over a sigma algebra and then go to a sigma ring which complicates a bunch of theory, maybe some sort of parallel exists. however, I can't really find one
it does not interrupt me,
but I do understand you, maybe we should change names of them but who will decide about it ?
I have found that this is really an issue in analysis, frankly. When I do work in algebra, everything seems quite consistent, maybe I am just used to the convention though
I can buy sigma algebra, I guess
Since there are a few reasons why that name is fine
But I couldn't find one about sigma ring
I can dig my heels in representation theory here
you know, maybe also, someone might have taken it incorrectly, started using it, publishing it, etc., etc., and now no one knows why or why.
i sure hope that isnt it haha
you wud be very suprised
maybe ill go ask an analyst tomorrow! because it has been bugging me for a while
.close
Closed by @floral rampart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I determine this?
,rotate
<@&286206848099549185>
@thorny stag Has your question been resolved?
@thorny stag Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this not true?
it's true though
@whole prawn Has your question been resolved?
but the e is raising just the d right?
yes
👍 thanks
Closed by @whole prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am on ii)
i have done the working out and there is no remainder, where have i gone wrong
you can find the remainder by plugging in $P\left(\frac{-b}{a}\right)$ where $P(x) = x^3 - 2x^2 - 4x + 8$
correct me if im misinterpreting your question
Xerunox
we are being asking to use long division to solve it
that is
interesting
what i would do in my case is work backwards, i would do $x^3 - 2x^2 - 4x + 8 = (x+2)(ax^2+bx+c)$ and then multiply those 2 brackets together to get a series of multiple unknowns in a polynomial, which you can then use to create several equations
it's my closest idea to how you would do long division, to be honest
Xerunox
Closed by @waxen iris
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where do i start
Induction
nah, induction will be hard here
Hm yeah
@waxen iris do you know anything about modular arithmetic
Just do mod
nah...
i think they want us to use deduction
... deduction?
wonder what they mean by that
thats just the only proof method weve been taught i think
is it mentioned by that name in your textbook
if any
anyway i got the idea that you could look at n even vs. n odd separately
yes thats what it would likely be
so how would i got about that
would i use 2n as n
no
and then 2n + 1
not 2n
any other letter except n
you would look at n = 2k and then separately at n = 2k+1
ok so 2y
then 2y + 1
ok...
once i get answers what would that prove
would i be that the divisible one would be the even one
would i do
2k^3 +2 = 0?
no
on two counts
- there is no reason to equate n^3 + 2 to zero. who said we wanted to know when it's zero?
- n^3 is (2k)^3 not 2k^3
sorry, typo fixed
thats what my thought process it
2k^3 means 2(k^3)
order of operations
but you are cubing 2k not just k
so n^3 is (2k)^3
you understand (2k)^3 ≠ 2(k^3) right
yes thats what i meant
just forgot to bracket it sorry
these brackets are of vital importance, unfortunately for you
anyway
what does (2k)^3 expand to?
8k^3
right
so then, for n = 2k we have n^3 + 2 = 8k^3 + 2
can you reason why 8k^3 + 2 is not a multiple of 8?
yea
ok
so now i do it with 2k+1
the second case is actually like three times easier if you know anything about even and odd numbers
well since ur adding 1, then it would be adding 3 to 8k^3, which would always be odd and never be a multiple of 8
right(ish) answer bs reasoning
well since ur adding 1, then it would be adding 3 to 8k^3
what
(2k+1)^3 is not equal to 8k^3 + 3
thats not what i meant
you have to add 2 after (2k+1)^3 since the question is it n^3+2 is divisible by 8
so it would be 8k^3 + 3
(2k+1)^3 is not equal to 8k^3 + 1 either.
no
(2k+1)^3 is not equal to 8k^3 + 1
(a+b)^3 ≠ a^3 + b^3
you fell victim to the freshman's dream
why do u keep saying squared?
typo, sorry.
that was confusing me
in principle yes
however this is not needed here
do you know that the product of two odd numbers is also odd?
Closed by @waxen iris
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
let me type out the equation
why does $3a^2(b+c)+3b^2(a+c)+3c^2(a_b)+6abc$ simplify to $3(a+b)(b+c)(a+c)$
that looks mistyped
3a^2(a+b) would give you an a^3 term which (a+b)(b+c)(a+c) does not have
yep a^3 is dead
schopenhoe
this is from yesterday sorry
i feel like there's a factoring rule that i missed out on
so i see they factor our the 3
but where does
(a+b)(b+c)(a+c) come from
factor theorem:
f(a,-a,c)=0
f(a,b,-b)=0
f(-c,b,c)=0
wth
so a function with those inputs equal 0?
i'm misunderstanding something
so they all equal 0
i understand how to distribute (a+b)(b+c)(a+c)
im still stuck sorry
i don't know how to apply that
so do you use division?
huh maybe i see where this is going
<@&286206848099549185>
uhm, im sorry, im not covering this topic rn myself (im 10th grade)
im gonna mess around with it and probs ask math stack exchange
alr sure
thanks who ever sent me this but i dont understand how to apply it to multivariate polynomials but i can sort of see where this is going
llike
does f(-a, a,c)= 0 relate (idk if this is the right word) to the factor of (a+c) and so on
.close
Closed by @sharp star
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to calculate the electric field strength at all three points, but i'm not sure how to start this.
I know intuitively 3 is zero because there's nothing going through it, but i thought 1 is zero as well but its not. can someone guide me through this?
@jaunty citrus Has your question been resolved?
@knotty finch
.close
Closed by @jaunty citrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can you remind us what ω(G) means
ive been staring at it for so long now i cant tell 😭
just want to get one more person's opinion 😄
<@&286206848099549185>
@silk kite Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @silk kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For part d, how is catching a deer at random times during the day an improvement
@random shell Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I prove that (a, b) ∩ Q is countable
I have already shown that there are infinite many fractions in the interval
Do you already know that Q is countable?
No
Have you heard of Cantor's diagonal argument?
That has to be uncountable as (a,b) for a<b is isomorphic to R and R is uncountable
It skips out a bit of details
What parts are you bothered with? So that I can elaborate on further?
I can show that there are infinite many s in (a,b)\Q
I just need a strict proof that (a,b)\Q is uncountable
So you already familiarized with (a,b) n Q having countably many elements?
yes
Ok, I found this proof
https://proofwiki.org/wiki/Uncountable_Set_less_Countable_Set_is_Uncountable
Yes, that's what I wanted to show you
Closed by @polar cove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Good evening
Goodnight.
- Use chain rule to derivate
I'm doing the first one and wanted to confirm that it is right
Let me take a picture of it
Re sent picture
Please let me know if I'm skipping a procedure or doing smth I shouldnt
Oh I see what youre saying
Thanks!
I'll close this channel and come back later lemme do the other ones
,w differentiate (5x^2-2x)^(3/2)
There it is
What you said hahaha
Something I did not understood
At a certain point you will have (3/2)(5x^2-2x)^(3/2)(10x-2)
You multiply the 3 for the whole thing and divide only the 10x-2
What do you mean by whole thing?
You have 2 dividing the 2 functions
And 3 multiplying the 2 functions aswell
Ok eureka
Theres no parenthesis
So you can multiply the 3/2 with any of the 2
(30x-6)/2
15x-3
3 common factor
(5x-1)3
@vapid tangle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vapid tangle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @gritty matrix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm so confused by these questions
for example, the first one has an answer of 2pi/3
it's negative, correct?
Theta?
so wouldn't it make sense for the radian value to be from a negative quadrant for cosine?
No
no just simply the answer is negative
Cos inverse is restricted to quadrants 1 and 2
why is it in q4
Draw it out
It’s not in q4?
2pi/3
yep, so you would choose a quadrant where it's negative aswell correct?
I don’t understand your question
The answer is negative right
Costheta= -1/2
mhm
first is 2pi/3
And what is the other
2nd would be 2pi/3+pi
Are you familiar with your unit circle?
somewhat
It makes these easier
It’s not.
which should never be something you do in math
If you just memorize one quadrant
You don’t have to memorize it if you don’t want to
yeah I generally know what a unit circle looks like
You can create your triangle 30 60 90 triangles
And 45 45 90 triangles EVERYTIME if you like
Or you can just memorize 3 diffirent cord points.
being 0, pi/2, pi, 3pi/2, 2pi?
or are you talking about in the
quadrant
I don't do triangles lol
,unitcircle
anyways what are you trying to get to?
No….
no?
We are quadrants 3 and 4
For this problem
And cosine is negative in quadrant 3
And positive in quadrant 4
yeah so we'd shift
To this problem
Just q3
Put down your calc for this problem
This is a simple problem with all unit circle values
That’s pi
No we aren’t looking for an answer in q4
We would refer to our unit circle
At what theta value is cosine -1/2 in quadrant 3
surely can't be that bad
I don’t quite understand why you say you want to run through it
And then use another unit circle value
It doesn’t matter sense.
Put down your calc for unit circle values ….
I'm not using it
I used it at first for that
but then for the rest
I math it out
by getting a common denominator
and adding
If you really want
Just subtract 2pi - 2pi/3
It’s just going the opposite direction
yes
The first square in q2
So if we go -2pi/3
That would move us over to q3
And the first square in the opposite direction from there
Instead of going counterclockwise like we normally do
We went clockwise 2pi/3
From the positive x-axis
hm
so 2pi/3 - 2pi/3
puts you in q3?
or -2pi/3
puts you in q3
not sure what you meant
yeah I guess it would
if it's -ve
-2pi/3 is q2
q3*
counter clockwise
or the opposite way it usually goes
Just memorize the unit circle…..
This problem should take two seconds
No calc needed at all
I would draw a little sketch
starting from the very beginning
Like this
cos -1/2
ok
but how would you know that
Where cosine is -1/2
if you only know the top quarter
Wydm
like sure it's easy but only if you have the entire thing in your head
You just memorize the patterns of theta on the unit circle
And if you memorize the cord sets
And apply what you remeber about when x and y are positive
In what quadrants
idk, I just feel it's not for me
Before you attempt these problems just memorize the unit circle…
yeah idk
just the math part
seems logical
like i can justify it
why you'd add 2pi
But you waste so much time….
to each their own I guess
You are justifying your answer using unit circle values it doesn’t make sense
Cos =1/2
It gives you pi/3 in ur calc
And add pi
To that answer
Because that transfer you from q1 to q3
okay
so the -ve simply moves you
from q1 to q2
so the way to do these questions is
take the positive, inverse cos
I'm not giving in 😭
Because no teacher is giving you a calc on this section
You will fail.
If you rely on a calc
You will not succeed, im being honest
If your test is no calc, and you don’t have your unit circle memorized
You will struggle
Unless you want to draw your triangles every single time .
I already had an assessment on this
with no calc
had the unit circle memorized and all
but I forgot it
it was like a month ago lol
the assessment I'm having on this is generally calc allowed
it's just a broader test
so my teacher will likely use
questions that calcs dont instantly solve
but I just wanted to grasp this minute concept
so answer me this, you plug in cos inverse of the positive value, then add pi or subtract from 2pi depending on where the value is positive/negative?
is that all there is?
I’m not going to entertain this way of solving it
It’s inefficient
And you will waste time
By the time you finish the first one
I will be done with them all
I can't just get a tattoo of it on my arm lol
it does because it follows a logical system
I beg for you just to memorize the unit circle
It will make your life easier
And if you are ever given a no calc test, which are common
if the test is no calc then I'll memorize it
otherwise I'll disregardi t
because I don't memorize anything
Whatever suits you i guess
i can't
lmao ok
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don’t understand the steps in red. Where did the 2x come from and why do you multiply it to the numerator and denominator
Could you also do dx = du/2x and then get the same 2x/2x multiplied to the integrand
Or is that different
dx = du/(2x) makes no mathematical sense
Well how I normally integrate functions is find dx = du…. And replace dx with that like I haven’t done du = dx….before so I don’t really know how that works
Also if u = x^2
Then du/dx = 2x
then dx = du/2x
No?
Which is why they multiply top and bottom by 2x instead
So I’m confused it’s illegal but I get the right answer with it?
So it’s wrong??
or
I’ve been doing that method for the like past 2 months since I’ve started integration is that something I should change
Do whatever you want
Because i don’t want it to cause like serious problems later on
where I can’t integrate or whatever because of it
idk your future
Why would I know what math classes you're gonna take
@lucid junco Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain to me how my teacher did the blue marked step
how did she bring the sqrt to the denominator
sqrt(x)/x = 1/sqrt(x)
(just dividing both parts by sqrt(x))
[
\f{a^n}{a^m} = a^{n-m}]
its this pretty much
factor a sqrt(1 - x^2) from the top, then simplify everything
Note that the integral got split as well
yeah
Which btw makes the LHS incorrect, there shouldn't be 'dx' twice in there
Or there should be an integral sign before the first blue part
wait
still dont get it
ill write it down maybe ill understand then
holdo
$\frac{\sqrt{1-x^2}}{1-x^2} = \frac{\sqrt{1-x^2}}{\sqrt{1-x^2}^2} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x^2}}$
Nel
gonna have to remember this one 👍🏽
It's pretty basic fraction manipulation
If it makes it easier do it like that
$\frac{\sqrt{1-x^2}}{1-x^2} = \sqrt{1-x^2}(1-x^2)^{-1} = (1-x^2)^{\frac{-1}{2}}$
Nel

@terse trellis Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there a theorem where you can easily calculate $\sum_{n=1}^{k} \frac{1}{n}$
Retribution | ᵇᵃˢᵉᵈ
🙏
is it this btw:$\ln(k) + \gamma + \frac{2k}{12k^2} + \mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{k^4}\right)$
Retribution | ᵇᵃˢᵉᵈ
There’s no closed form at least not simple ones.
Eulers constant?
now. idk the formula or anything. but, isnt this sum upto k terms for a Harmonic Progression?
☹️
[ \rainbow{\ga + \varphi(k+1) } ]
Pure
oh maybe that'll do
Basically, the closed form is horrendous but sometimes it’s denoted as H_n
?
?
Closed by @stray cairn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.this is an approximation apparently
Yes it is.
Closed by @vale furnace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @dense rapids
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why csnr I send my picture bruh
What's going un
is it .png?
ok here
i just dont know how to go on about solving this double integral
i was ihnking of splitting it apart cuz its being added
the 24r^2 i alreaady did and got 48pie/3 (after double integral and bounds)
but idk how to do the left side of the equation
<@&286206848099549185>
,rotate
Show how you got this
24r^3/3
You treat r and theta as independent variables. So one is constant with respect to the other
plug in r values
which gives me 24/3 but with theta integral its 24/3(theta)
and bounds are 2pie and 0
pi, not pie
so its just 24/3 times 2 pie
yea but idk how to do it
Why not
When you integrate r, you just factor out the theta terms
which one is the constant
,tex .int rules
riemann
The one that's not being integrated
oh so wait
for the first integral is it just 18r^4/4(cos62thetasintheta)?
only thing we do is the integral of r^3 but everything else is the same?
@sweet shard
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
I don't know what "it" is
okok i get it
kinda
for this
do i need to memorize the double angle formula thingy
@sweet shard
No
@stray dew Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do make it so a reimann sum doesnt count area behind y axis negative
Bc im trying to find $\int_{-4}^{4} (4 - \sqrt{x^2}) , dx$ but im supposed to use the reimann sum method instead 😑
Retribution | ᵇᵃˢᵉᵈ
and whenever I use this method the area is always 0 bc the negative area is the same as the positive area and the stuff cancels out
when the answer should really be 16
,w graph 4 - |x| from -4 to 4
it should really be 16 yes
but idk how to get the reimann sum not to make it 0
it basically counts the area behind y axis as negative area
I did $\sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(4 \Delta x - |i \Delta x|\Delta x\right)$
Retribution | ᵇᵃˢᵉᵈ
thats not right
hold on
wait nvm it is
I did this bc $\sum_{i=1}^{n} (4 - |i\Delta x|)\Delta x=\sum_{i=1}^{n} \left(4 \Delta x - |i \Delta x|\Delta x\right)$
Retribution | ᵇᵃˢᵉᵈ
I made it 4 -|i deltaX| bc im using circumscribed rectangles in the sum on the right and inscribed rectangles on the left
I wish I had an image so I could explain this easier
still need help? because i managed to create a sum that just gave me 16, using the normal definition.
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i have a vague idea of how to do this, but im not sure what exactly
basically each rook has to occupy its own row and column, that no other rook occupies
so just looking at the columns, the first rook has 8 choices
the next rook has 7 choices, etc
so 8!
hm are the rooks unique
if not, then i have to divide by 8!
which gives me 1: 8!/8!
are you sure about this?
probably not have to
here’s how i would think about it
you have the case where all the rooks are in different rows and columns already
what if a column has exactly 2 rooks in it?
actually
nah forget about that
you can try it, i will try to think of a simple way to think about it
ah - if you are missing a rook in any column, you need to have a rook in every row
oh yeah
that's what i was trying to prove
we want configurations where not all columns are used now? X out one column (say the A file first). how many ways can you set the rooks?
edit: and ugh we’d need to require all the other columns be used or do some PIE bs
all rows must be used
hmm this will get a little ugly with all the ways we could not use columns
i have a stupid thing i want to try
this might be PIE lol

!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
cases that don’t work are when not all columns are used and not every row is used?
wait we have to use pie. 8^8 ways to put one rook per row and 8^8 to put one rook per column. this double counts the ways that have one rook in each row and column. so for that there are 8 ways to choose the column for first row, 7 for second, etc. thus it is 2*8^8-8! ?
wouldn't this work?
every row is used there
does this work?
what are you computing there? 
total number of ways to place the rooks
@toxic stirrup Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @toxic stirrup
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would a phase shift affect a transformation of a trig identity?
does the graph physically cut off at any point before the phase shift
or does it simply start there
?
this question doesn't make sense
trig identities are just equalities
$a sin(bx+c)$
THAT'S MY QUANT, MY QUANTITATIVE
with the cut off approach i mentioned earlier, it would be possible to affect the shape of the sin or cosine graph
which is why I doubt that is the answer
i.e instead of starting from min, you'd start from max
you could*
a makes the wave up and down bigger, b increases the fequency, c shifts the phase
think of it like this
y=x
now the RHS can be a function
so lets say y = f(x)
f(x) = x
so now we have y = f(x)
(remember, f(x) is still just x)
then we "shift" the function
y=f(x+a)
which is just y=x+a
there is no cutting off
you're just moving the function
it's like y=x^2
and moving it up 1
to be y=x^2+1
so nothing happens before it?
did youclick on the link I sen t
so what difference does the phase shift make
to desmos
yes
so what's the purpose of a phase shift
that's my question
if it has no overall affect
on the graph
THAT'S MY QUANT, MY QUANTITATIVE
