#help-26
1 messages · Page 23 of 1
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vale cipher
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@undone flicker Has your question been resolved?
@undone flicker Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How’s this wrong
(x+5)^2 is always positive non-negative for real x
-6 for example works here
So what’s the answer
9?
you can do this if you rule out x=-5
X=9 if I divide both sides by (x+5)^2
when you divide both sides of an inequality, you still have an inequality remaining
9<0
e.g. $2x > 4$ implies $x > 2$
riemann
do you think this is true?
X<9
yes
do you understand why x can't be -5
so combine this
with the mathematical statement of what this means
@tight rivet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
are you familiar with the conjugate root theorem? 
similar uses but different idea
do you know what a complex conjugate is?
well when a polynomial root has $a+bi$ as a factor, it must have $a-bi$ as a factor if it has integer coefficients
MrFancy
so if the polynomial has 2i as one of it's roots what must be the other root? 
-2i?
very good
ok so now do you know how to write polynomials in terms of their roots? :)
uhh kinda??
i have it in my notes too
i can try
(x-3) (x - (-2i)) (x - (2i))
💀💀
there that's it, that's all it asks you for :) do you think you can do the rest from here?
same thing applies, if we want integer coefficients :) put a negative in front of that guy
do we simplify this more?
that's a linear factorization mein freund :)
$x^2+6x+10$ simply has roots $x=3-i,3+i$
MrFancy
x^2+6x+10 is not linear, the questions asks for a linear factorization :)
oh wait is this linear factorization
Ohhh
i just reread it
ah thanks
so for square roots
we dont simplify those
it just says the same?
!!!!!!
thanks :DD
.close
Closed by @warm grail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
Finding the domain
anybody know why i got it wrong?
I usually start with the bottom one (2), but it had no x, so i wasnt sure how to go about it
finding the domain
mein freund where would this function be undefined? :)
if the bottom would equal 0
so why is the domain x>=-6? 
the bottom had no x, only 2
so i didnt know how to go about it
and just did the top 😂
so if there's no value that makes this function undefined what is the domain? :)
all real values?
I don't like that denominator is zero rule of thumb cause things like this happen, it's a good idea but not 100%
ahhh i see
just find places where the function become undefined this therefore, will not be part of the domain
at x=0 1/x becomes undefined because of division of zero
at x=-1 sqrt(x) becomes undefined because of negatives inside radicals
things like these cause (undefinedness?) :)
Closed by @limpid violet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@willow ridge
solve inside brackets first
make denominators same
multiply 1/5 by 3/3
and 2/3 by 5/5
and add
you get 3-(13/5)
now try do the rest
3 is also 3/1
so make the denominator 15 by multiplying by 1 by 15
@native loom Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @native loom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the second page it what i tried although i didn’t get very far
i was trying to prove that MN (M and N are the centre of my bottom two circles) and BC are parallel because then the proof would fall out easily after that but it hasn’t really work…
<@&286206848099549185>
@golden zodiac Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@golden zodiac Has your question been resolved?
@golden zodiac Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m confused, is the solution wrong?
Because when I take arcsin(-sqrt(3)/2 I get -pi/3 as a base angle
But the solution says that the base angle is POSITIVE pi/3
Any ideas
The base angle is relative to the reference angle, both pi and 2pi.
From pi, it would be pi + pi/3 and from 2pi it would be 2pi - pi/3.
So why would the base angle be positive instead of negative which was I got on my calculator?
I'm making a graph to help explain.
Sure, thanks
You are solving for the values of theta whose sine is equal to -sqrt(3)/2.
There are two possible angles which are both 60 degrees, or pi/3.
The explanation should have further explained that the base angle was relative to the reference angles pi and 2pi.
In this case, 4pi/3 and 5pi/3.
Right so Quadrants 1,2 are where sin<0 which is what you showed in the graph.
To get to quadrant 2 wouldn’t I need to perform theta - pi
You have the quadrants in the wrong order. Q1 is the upper-right quadrant and subsequent quadrants are in a counterclockwise order.
Well I thought I’d draw it like this because we are looking at the negative angles so we go backwards
?
No, for the sake of clarity, Q1 is always in the upper-right quadrant.
Correct.
And to get quadrant 4 it is 2pi - theta
Correct.
and we’ve established that the base angle is -pi/3 so
Q3: pi - (-pi/3)
Q4: 2pi - (-pi/3)
And you can generalize the possible angles by noting that the two angles are symmetric around 3pi/2.
Q3: 4pi/3
Q4: 7pi/3
Which would be 3pi/2 ± pi/6.
Hold on so why do we not look at 60 degrees (-pi/3) anymore?
This is a "better" way to solve this type of problem in a more general sense.
Okay so looking at its coterminal would help us solve it easier?
It takes a bit of repetition to understand why.
You can use one angle, 3pi/2, for the coterminal angle, rather than two angles, pi and 2pi.
3pi/2 + (2n)pi ± pi/6
Yeah so it’s symmetrical around 270 degrees
Correct.
Does this mean that we can use that to find other solutions ?
Yes, if you are looking for solutions in a given interval.
You can add 2npi to 3pi/2, for all natural values of n; ..., -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, ... .
Hm I’ve never really worked with finding general solutions because we haven’t learnt it in class since we only do equations with a restricted interval
Can you explain the 2npi
It's a mathematical way to write out all of the coterminal angles for a given angle. It's somewhat implied that n means all Natural numbers, {..., -4, -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, ...}.
Rather than write every negative and positive integers.
I see. But wouldn’t adding 3pi/2 + 2npi + (- pi/6) make us overshoot and miss the solution?
This is where the given interval comes into play as a constraint on the solutions that you will need to solve for.
So you’ve made the arguement of sin equal to the co terminal (2pi/3) + 2npi +- pi/6
But wouldn’t it just be - pi/6 because we’ve established the base angle as -pi/6 so it can’t be positive as well?
No, you will need both + and - pi/6 because both angles sine value are equal to -sqrt(3)/2.
So they are both possible values of x that could lie in the interval [0,3].
As mentioned earlier, this is just a way of generalizing a solution that has two angles that are symmetric around one angle, 3pi/2.
Oh because it’s symmetrical around 270 it will have -+ is that why?
Correct.
You could also solve this in terms of pi + pi/3 and 2pi - pi/3, but that is more work.
Okay
Anywhos, from the image above, you can do some rearranging to solve for x in terms of n by multiplying both sides by 3/2pi.
Okay ill try that
Any luck?
I’m having a little trouble with the rearranging part which is a little embarrassing lol I don’t know what’s going on
Okay so for x instead of multiplying xby 2pi/3 you divided by 3/2pi which makes sense. Ok I think I see how you did it now
So now for the “n” part what shall we do about that
So this is where the generalization comes into play. Set x = 0 and solve for n. This will help you find the lower bound for n.
And likewise, set x = 3 and solve for n. This will help you find the upper bound for n.
Keep in mind, that you want n to be integers so if you get a fraction, you will either need to round up or down for the integer solution.
You will get the two solutions given in the explanation you posted which should be n = 0 only. Plug that into the equation above and you will get your two solutions.
@lucid junco Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is going on in this first step? im not sure how he was able to e^ix form (amc 12b q24
(e^(ix) - e^(-ix))/(2i) = sin(x)
That said i think they made a typo?
Like they forgot to include the negative on the 2nd exponent in the pi/7 and 2pi/7 term
oh thank you
i never knew about this identity
.close
Closed by @mental glade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hyy
did you have a question?
@pseudo prairie Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is the x-value of the maximum point -1?
What's your attempt so far?
I found the vertex which is (-1, 245)
And since it’s saying maximum that must indicate the parabola is going down right
It is
Closed by @bold obsidian
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I do this/
Is there more to this problem?
im also confused on how these values of a and b will make g(x) = g^-1(x)
swap x and y
Right, so give me the equation for g inverse
G-1(x) =(b-a)/(x-1) -a
But how do I get this?
So to find a and b, you need to equate $g(x)$ and $g^{-1}(x)$
TooManyCooks
@regal echo Has your question been resolved?
Have you tried equating them yet??
yeah soz about to
it deosn't work on my calculator...
there's two unknowns right?
so don't we need at least two equations to solve that?
Actually you don't need to
Let me show you. Give me a sec
$g(x) = 1 + \frac{b-a}{x+a} = -a + \frac{b-a}{x-1} = g^{-1}(x)$
TooManyCooks
You don't have to solve anything at all
You want this to be valid for all x
However, you can easily see that letting a = -1 does that
For any b
and any x
well, except x = 1
That's it, just let a = -1
Wait did I fuck up my sign
Closed by @regal echo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help on 3.
<@&286206848099549185>
@willow scroll Has your question been resolved?
em
Ok Jimmy, considering adding the higher rows with the lower rows to make it simpler first
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
b^2 - 4ac >0
b^2 - 4ac = (k-1)^2
when k=1,
wont (k-1)^2 = 0 and not >0
so the line and the curve don't meet for all values of k?
@tulip eagle Has your question been resolved?
Are you talking about the discriminant Δ of the equation you get after intersecting the two curves?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yeah
Ok nice, yes that (k - 1)² is correct. Since (k - 1)² ≥ 0 for every value of k, it means that there always exist at least one intersection
@tulip eagle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
At the rings initial position, it is at rest right?
SMH I doubt it's gonna move at a constant speed
@dry warren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why did they make 1.175 negative?
sd is 18 mean is 96
the diagram is a bit misleading
can u indicate the area 0.88 refers to
its from -z_t and then to the right all the way (to infinity) right?
So then you need to find what -z_t is, but I presume your reverse cumulative table/calculator
does P(t > X) ?
thats where the minus sign comes from - since the normal distribution is symmetric about the mean
@rapid mantle Has your question been resolved?
oh right I see
thanks
Closed by @rapid mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It's question i
Solve the numerator and denominator one at a time
Am I doing it right?
ur in grade 9?
i learnt it in a diff way
Do I cross out 2x^2 since it's both on the denominator and nominator?
Man I just entered college and lost all my math skills
oh sad
I'm relearning it ok :(
you can only cross them out if they're in multiplication
did you solve them together?
no like
wait i will solve and send it
idk hwo to explain
alr
yeh
Is this the denominator?
no it's the numerator
the denominator is 2x² - (4+3)x + 6
@regal folio want me to solve and send it for you?
Simplify it
I wanna try and learn it first
brb
Why is there a 4-3 in the numerator?
well we look at the sign of the last term when we're splitting the middle term look at the sign of the last term
It's '-' so we have to find a number that equals to the product of the first and the last coefficients when multiplied and the coefficient of the middle term when subtracted
The product of first and last terms is 2 x 6 which is 12 and is also equal to 4 x 3
The coefficient of the middle term is 1 which also equals to 4-3
idk how to simplify it
ik how to rationalize it
tell me how to do it too ;-;
i dont get it
once ur done solving send it
alr wait
hm
It's.... nit complete yet
so u know long division method
Yeah but it's kinda hard for me. I remember there being another mehod
But am not sure
oh
@prisma holly can u plss solve it and send it
Honestly yeah, I think it would be easier for you to explain the work process of it please
yh..
that is solving quadratic eqn method?
are you allowed to use caculator to solve quadratic and cubic eqns?
Yeah, iirc you could do it on the calculator but I'm using the fs-570ex version know so I dunno
mb I don't know
uh
Which?
2
wait what
here ill give u what it is for faster
top = solutions: (x-2) or (3x+2)
bottom solutions: (x-2) or (3x-2)
hes simplyfying
u gotta do some cancel shit
do u know the
this method
either equating or comparing coeffs
Not really
ah
I solved em individually if you don't understand anything hmu
;-;
u solve it
I'm pretty sure the calculator doesn't show these it just shows the direct value of x
u gotta reverse work it
.
i did this in 10s
wait i will try solving it too
It's kinda complicated
~~i do not know how to do with caculator 💀 ~~
And I don't think they understand it completely
btw @regal folio im quite sure that if u dont know this method
what method is that?
Wait so which one is correct?
Is this used to simplify?
no its used to solve the entire qn
hmm wdym which one?
what do u do after this?
There's only one answer there
wait...
is this even right?
don't ask me
wait
I never understood this shit
mhm
Oh nvm, understood it
well technically the answer is
hm?
wait im very confuse
my caculator tells me theres no remainder
but i seeu didnothing wrong
hm
I'm not sure if this is a bit much too ask but could ya'll monitor me doing another question just in case I mess something up?
no prob
ii.
@fleet canopy give me awhile i try this method
okayy
I think I can do something with the denominators but not sure how to do it
Should I make the denominators same by multiplying them with each other?
huh
can u turn all the eqns into (ax+b)(cx+d) form first
then u will see something magical
0_0
On it
uhh @fleet canopy sorry i got no idea how to do that i never seen an equation give x=0 value before

You solved the first one?
lmao-
@prisma holly u know how to solve when theres an x=0?
also it cannot be constant in last bracket cuz then there wont be x^3
send how you got x = 0
Yep
caculator
nice
The one you showed me?
$2x^{3}-x^{2}-6x$
MrZhongZuChongTu
OHHHHHH
yes
it does = 0 in the question
its this one
this is the logn div
the cubic eqn literal = (x-2)(3x-2)(x+3)+9x+18
hmm
how is it going?
;-;
bruh which asshole created math
im so confused rn
OK up until the right denominator
ok give me what u have so far
ahh u see
Oh ok
now u do some cancelling u should be left with something in the form of
MrZhongZuChongTu
yep
Do I now make the denominators the same?
When I put it in my calc I got 2 and -3/2
what?
when u guys finally solve it
and get the ans
ping me
and pls explain it once to me als
;-;
thank u
ion even know anymore
you solved it?
bruh
yall ignoring me?
noo
we havent solve yet
yeah
Is this right?
potato how u working on the cancelling
ok wow tahst
ok u mad ea mistake
i think u got confuse for times with +
its juts numerator x numterator, denom x denom
yep
If it is multiplication there's no need right?
yea
man
oh god
btw for this qn the answer should be
i assume = 0
;-;
manually
i mean we need the working
i assume u talking ab ii
Yea
$\frac{(x-2)(3x-2)(x+3)+9x+18}{(x-2)(3x-2)}$
Wait, so if I multiply it, won't I have to multiply (x+3)(x+4) first?
MrZhongZuChongTu
no dont multiply
leave it in bracket form
u can cancel
show me what u got
Ok
.
this is the furthest i can get
idk how simplify anymore
That's the answer?
mm
Wait so is it?
is it what?
The answer
OK cool
i gotta go, good luck with other qns
Thx
can u explain it to me
I'm here if you need me
well the first step he just split the middle term of all 4 equations and wrote the result
Then on the second step he multiplied them and cross out the same terms
mhm
And he just repeated it until he got the answer
So you get it now?
@regal folio do you still need help with other questions? If not you should close the channel
yw
I wanna do one more question if that's fine
we should make a gc and solve the questions there fr
Am I doing good so far?
yeah
I can just cross it out from here right?
yeah
I don't need to put them under one line
nope no need for that
Closed by @regal folio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is the rule for going from step 2 to 3? how does the log dissapear
$a^{\log_a b} = b$
Stephen
Closed by @gloomy ivy
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is there a better way to have this kind of curve?
@mystic arrow Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Idk where to start at all for the 9
convert all in terms of one function
Wdym ?
doesn't it seem like quadratic to you?
Yeah that’s what I was thinking
yes, that's a way
substitute u = cos(x) and use quadratic formula
solve for u and then for x
yup, cos(x) = -1/2
You are done. Just write the general solutions.
@lilac furnace Has your question been resolved?
Yeah thanks
Closed by @lilac furnace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
how can i prove this using the epsilon delta definition
given that epsilon is > 0
and assuming that 0<|x| < delta
how can i then check that |1/1+x^2 -1| is less than epsilon
you get to pick the delta
and it will depend on epsilon
try it for epsilon = 0.1 for instance
yeah i need to pick delta that will depend on epsilon
in a form like delta = epsilon/2
sure
not with actual numbers
i just dont know how to factor f(x) to be |x| so i can relate the delta to the epsilon
if you get what im saying
like how do i prove this limit being = 1
im working on it why is this so hard
cause it was an exam question
fair
cause usually you can just do some algebra and get |....| < epsilon to be the same as the thing thats |...| < delta
but i have literally no idea how to do that stuff on here
yeah im trying minimuns and using triangle ineq but got stuck so now ive decided to redo ;-;
try it for examples though
like try it for epsilon = 0.1
what delta do you need?
what about for epsilon = 0.01
ok i tried this and am here rn
0.01 < 1/1+x^2 < 1.01
i cant multiply with 1+x^2 cause then idk if it is + or -
i think you messed up that algebra slightly
hmmm ok
once you fix the algebra error you can invert all sides (take the reciprocal)
@neon iron Has your question been resolved?
nope ;-;
ive just been staring at this i have no clue on how to get a fraction with x^2 +1 as the denominator
Closed by @hoary skiff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could somebody help me understand how to prove a variant of the mutilated chessboard problem?
If one were to remove two squares of the same color, I can understand that perfectly covering it with 2x1 domino tiles would be impossible
However, in the case that you remove one black and one white square, I can't really find a convincing way to prove that there must be a perfect cover
I've gone so far as to conclude that there could be 31 white and 31 black left and therefore the cover would have 31 dominos in it (a domino has to cover 1 black and 1 white)
but that doesn't seem rigourous enough, where to go from here?
take a covering of the normal chessboard. this then gets broken in two places. can you repair this somehow?
broken meaning what?
well 2 places get removed
2 squares get removed
no you can't
oh.
wow that was actually much simpler than i thought it would be
if those two squares were next to eachother
that would be like a normal cover of the chessboard with one domino removed so that case still must give a perfect cover
thank you!
.close
Closed by @bright hawk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
if, sure
but if not, then what
@bright hawk
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I take -1 out the limit?
I actually cannot tell where I can do that
Take powers out of the limit
@hybrid fog Has your question been resolved?
$\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{-1}\frac{1}{\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)}$, and then use the properties of limit.
Van21st
$\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)^{-1}=\frac{1}{\left(1+\frac{1}{n}\right)}$
Van21st
@hybrid fog Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hybrid fog
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thankyou
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, does anyone know how to prove that nth degree polynomials divided by (t-1/2)^2 are an affine subspace of nth degree polynomials and find the corresponding vector space ? i know that in order to be a affine subspace for every point of (nth degree polynomials divided by (t-1/2)^2 )set must for each vector of the corresponding vector space the operation between them must give a point in the (nth degree polynomials divided by (t-1/2)^2 )set .
a hint is to work for start for n=3 or n=4
@barren laurel Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
can i show that (nth degree polynomials divided by (t-1/2)^2 )set is a vector space ?
.close
Closed by @barren laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I find the rank of this matrix
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Well since it’s an orthogonal matrix it is full rank
Meaning it’s rank is equal to its dimension
Wait I might be mistaken
This may not be orthogonal
If you can manage to compute the eigenvalues then it is the number of distinct eigenvalues of the matrix
I didn’t really get it
You mean you can’t compute the eigenvalues
I didn’t study them yet
Ah i see
Well all I know is that it’s a symmetric matrix
And I don’t know if we can conclude something about it’s rank
Did you get it or no ?
please dont ping people directly, but im still stumped trying to work on it
Aa okay im sorry thank you
i have a hunch that this matrix has rank n
but im struggling to prove it
i think that if you can manage to show that it has an inverse that might be the best bet
Can you please tell me the approaches that you used
well i didnt solve it
im jsut sharing my hunch
what i tried though was showing that the kernel of the matrix is the zero vector
but i couldnt complete my proof
that completes the proof
for if a matrix is invertible then it has full rank
i guess it kind of comes from something called the rank nullity theorem
which i dont know if youve heard of
but suffic it to say, if you can show that there exists an inverse then youve shown that the rank of C is n
i guess you could also argue that the determinant is non-zero and so the rank is n
I dont really know this theorem
I’ll try to prove that the determinant is different than 0
@south zodiac Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@south zodiac Has your question been resolved?
@south zodiac Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when doing this should i make a propositional statement first?
such as P(x) = x takes a job in the idustry, Q(x) = x goes to graduate school
then the negation would be ¬P(x) V ¬Q(x)
?
would that be correct for a)
@agile moth Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I solve this with a sequence of equivalences
@agile moth Has your question been resolved?
@agile moth Has your question been resolved?
please don’t ping specific people
You can start by using the definition of implies
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@marsh patrol Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @raven thicket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
about these values
I don't know how to calculate them really, I know (a) is sqrt(3) because I learned that It was an important angle
Im making it more complicated every time 

@burnt mountain Has your question been resolved?
Okay. What does 7pi/6 look like?
Good
so 7pi/6 = 6pi/6 + pi/6
So it's like you start with pi, and then add another pi/6
Does that help you picture it?
Oh I understand
its equal to sin [ pi + pi/6 ]
and since its a sum inside the sine
its equal to sin(pi)cos(pi/6)+cos(pi)sin(pi/6)
since sin(pi) is 0 I cancel the first term
and its equal to cos(pi)sin(pi/6)
so (-1)(1/2)
-1/2
🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹🥹
✅
Good job
You could do that trick for all special angles: 30, 45, and 60
Just gotta imagine where you are first and see what your angle is with respect to the closest x-axis
Here it's helpful to think of 30 degrees measured from pi
I understand
thanks you again\
but what about the sec(5pi/3) ?
oh its not defined right
nvm it is
You good now?
nvmmm
it worked on this one too
that deconstruction method
thanks a lot again (again )
.close
Closed by @burnt mountain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain question 1
which part are you having trouble with?
yep
idk how to get all answers within the limit
first of all, what angles a do you know that have sin(a) = sqrt(2)/2?
pi/4 3pi/4
