#help-23
1 messages · Page 431 of 1
@chrome knoll Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! Trying to do a delta math problem but I’m having issues with factoring… seems like the trinomial won’t factor
Once you get to this point, you can square the five and then try subtracting that 25 from both sides! that should give you -45 for that last term and then you should be able to factor out a 3 from all the terms and things should work from there 🙂
Closed by @next wedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyone able to help me with understanding a question I had on a calc 1 exam about indeterminate form using l hopital rule?
Send the question and the work you’ve done!
I just finished the exam so I’m going off of head space but i can tell you the process and vaguely the problem
x —> ♾️ was the limit. (1-x^9)^x (something like that)
On my practice exams were kept finding the anti derivative until it finally worked out but if it was an endless loop we would divide it by 1/x as the denominator so that’s what I did
and it become ln(1-x^9)(09x^8) / 1/x
nvm forget it i’ll just use a practice exam question for example since i don’t recall it
after the ln(1-4/x) / 1/x I’m not sure what exactly to do
Well now you have a 0/0 form, so you can use l'Hopital's rule.
I think I know where I messed up now, i didn’t the know derivative of 4/x was 4x^-1 and I put it as positive
I was only doing problems that just used l hopital rule where I could just derive constantly without being in an endless loop but this question had you add 1/x and I didn’t exactly know what to do with it when deriving
thank you
.close
Closed by @frail osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so, i have two question to check if what i did is right.
So, i need to find the directional derivative for f(x,y) = x/(x^2 + y^2) at (1,2) with direction v=(3,5)
i found some theorem from the book and got: df/dv(1,2) = <9/(25*sqrt(34) , -4/(5*sqrt(34)))>.
but i got this after spending about an hour figuring out how to do it myself
i calculated the tangent plane with partial derivatives then found the normal vector for the tangent plane which was N = <3/25, -4/25, -1> then built the plane with it to get z = (3/25)x -(4/25)y + 2/5
then i used the given vector v=<3,5>, turned it into <3,5,0> to use it with the normal vector of the tangent plane N= <3/25, -4/25, -1>, moved that plane to (1,2,1/5) to then get the plane 5x-3y+1.08z = -0.78, tried to do some more stuff to get some sort of curve for the intersection of f(x,y) and the latter plane to get some nice curve to use for the derivative but i was just defeated so i just used some theorem from the book to calculate the directional derivative at that point and got that it was df/dv(1,2) = <9/(25*sqrt(34) , -4/(5*sqrt(34)))>.
My question is, is it futile trying to get some sort of parametrization to get the curve of that intersection to then calculate the derivative at that point?
i figured i could do something like that analogous of how we calculate the partial derivative for some function but i just couldn't get a nice curve
Without reading this, directional derivatives are scalars and not vectors
You're better off using
$$D_u f(a,b)=\nabla f(a,b) \cdot \hat{u}$$
Civil Service Pigeon
ig you can parameterise the curve, but the clean one is just the line $(x(t), y(t)=(1,2)+tu$
ohhh, yeah, the theorem was the dot product which is a scalar, my bad
Civil Service Pigeon
then take $f(x(t), y(t))$ and differentiate at $t=0$
Civil Service Pigeon
yeah, this is exactly the theorem i found i just didn't apply it well, let me correct it
yeah, the solution should be -11/(25*sqrt(34))
,w directional derivative of \frac{x}{x^2+y^2} at (1,2) in the direction of (3/5, 4/5)
wait, how is that the intersection curve? i got something like
after "geogebraing" it
the line is the path you follow when moving from (1,2) in the direction of v
so you're effectively turning the two-variable function into a one-variable function
namely $g(t)=f\left(\mathbf{r}(t)\right)$
Civil Service Pigeon
i don't know if you didn't understand me or i didn't understand you, i guess i didn't understand you, are you talking about the tangent (the derivative) of whatever parametrization i could have found from the intersection of the plane with f(x,y) (let's call it g(t) like you mentioned)?
this parameterisation approach is the formal definition of the directional derivative
I'm saying to set $\mathbf{r}(t)=(1,2)+t \cdot \mathbf{\hat{u}}$ (the line through $(1,2)$ in the unit direction of $\mathbf{v}$), define $g(t)=f\left(\mathbf{r}(t)\right)$, and then $g'(0)$ is the directional derivative
Civil Service Pigeon
$D_{\mathbf{u}} f=\nabla f \cdot \mathbf{\hat{u}}$ is just a shortcut derived from this definition (apply the chain rule to $g'(t)$)
Civil Service Pigeon
my point was that you could have found a curve and differentiated (it's fine in a conceptual sense)
but you should've used the simpler line parameterisation rather than a plane intersection
Im not precisely following, why are we talking about curve parametrizations for a directional derivative? I assume it has something to do with the geometric representation of it-
iirc OP likes the idea of parameterising things explicitly a lot
uh.
right, i think i understand a bit what you mean, i'm just not too familiar about your last step letting g(t) = f(r(t)) but i'll think about it, i guess that would be f(1,2) when t= 0 which can be useful for when i try to calculate the derivative for df
i'm just using what's familiar to me
in class when we calculated the partial derivative for x, y aor any other variable of a function we got a nice parametrization for our function which we could use to calcualte the derivative
yeah, i think this is making more sense now
Id assume that this idea becomes pretty apparent if you write down how r(t) looks like if written as ix(t) + jy(t).
yeah, i didn't think of it that way since i very rarely write a plane function in vector form, it's always as an equation y = whatever * x
thanks, i think i got the idea now @tardy mango @split kayak
.solved
Closed by @hollow hound
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Suppose $\kappa$ is a regular cardinal and $\langle \alpha_i : i \in \kappa \rangle$ is a strictly increasing sequence of ordinals. Show that $cf(\bigcup{\alpha_i : i \in \kappa}) = \kappa$.
toast
@tranquil geyser Has your question been resolved?
What have you tried?
Hmm
I am not 100% sure how to approach the problem
but maybe i need to start with defeinitions
maybe i need to find a cofinal subset of the union, then show the minimum size is kappa
<@&286206848099549185>
is the idea to show its \leq kappa then \geq kappa
.solved
Closed by @tranquil geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, can anyone guide me through this
I can't picture my work at the moment, but here's what I wrote:
Observe that 9 > S > 0
Since A has supremum and infimum, there exists x_n and y_n such that lim n -> inf x_n = SupA and lim n -> inf y_n = InfA
maybe I can also write 1/2 <= y < 1, then:
-1/2 >= -y > -1
2 >= 1/y > 1
thats all I got, thanks in advance
so you know 0 < 1/y - y <= 3/2
yessir I do
can you show that 1/y - y actually attains 3/2?
don't we just merge the inequalities I wrote?
I can also write the expression in S as x(1/y - y)
its just that I am having a hard time proving the existence of supremum and infimum of S
2 <= x <= 6 btw
so x(1/y - y) < 6(3/2) = 9
Then find a sequence of x in A and y in [1/2, 1) so that x(1/y - y) -> 9
aaaa
ok so for x, since x belongs to A, we can just use sequence x_n
but for y tho...
a sequence doesn't have to grab all values inside [1/2,1) right?
correct, it just needs to be in the interval
ok so let p_n = 1 - 1/(n+2) be a sequence for y?
and before continuing, I jst wanna clarify smth, subsequence is basically a sequence of a sequence right?
so p_n -> 1?
then x(1/y - y) -> 6(1-1) = 0
a, then thats for the infimum 😅
so for supremum uh
q_n = 1/2 + 1/2n ?
ohh no i tripped because 1 is not in S
in y i mean
good catch
q_n = 1/2 +1/3n this will do
that works
ok so basically we have everything, just need to figure out how to write it down
yep!
err I think we WILL be using supremum/infimum limit theorem
which one is that?
err like if there exists a sequence that converges to c, then sup/inf exists
c is either upper/lower bound
of S
ah, yeah
c is an upper (lower) bound of S, and a sequence in S converges to c, then c is the sup (inf)
yessir
since we already found that 0 < S < 9
for supS, can I just safely let c = 9 be an upper bound of S? Or do I need to do smth else b4 this
you should show that S is bounded by 0 and 9
didnt we have this already
0 < x/y - xy < 9
you showed it earlier. yeah.
sooo its safe right
Yeah, I'm saying you should include it as part of your written proof.
alr maybe to make this clear, i can write my steps and send it here
wait
I can now take a pic lol
writing really does clear things out
because idk how to proceed lol
in the theorem, I need to find a sequence in S, not in x or y
bruh
@drowsy moss don't mind me 😅
you have sequences for x and for y. put them together so you have a sequence in S
Just as a point, you said "lim n -> inf b_n" but didn't set it equal to anything.
and used the wrong sign for q_n
oh yea lol I didnt equate lim b_n, and wdym by wrong sign for q_n
oh
I fixeed the sign to plus
so abt this, lemme define a sequence w_n in S such that
w_n = a_n x (1/q_n - q_n)
and proceed from there?
then this means I need another sequence in S for the infimum right?
and im done?
ofc after applying the theorems and stuff
yep
Closed by @jolly sail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey
i need material for calculus basic to bit advance
im sure you can find study materials or textbooks online
I need suggestions
.close
Closed by @regal igloo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In part (c), i proved that inequality
how do i go on proving that minimum will occur for p_j = 1/365 for all j
@balmy sky Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.
Hi, I have a question. If I have f continuous on [a,b], then how would I show it is bounded from above using bolzano weierstrauss? I just want a small hint of how to go, do not give me answers.
I have worked out a bit:
Nefer
that's a good start
Yeah I just restated the definition of Bolzano-Weierstrauss, now I am stuck again.
now you just have to use continuity of f
yes limit
But do I need to derive anything else from this theorem?
I pointed out the convergence of xnk already.
hint: ||apply f on both sides of the limit||
Apply f both sides? How?
because f is continuous, you can put it inside/outside limits
So I would go for something like $\lim_{k\to \infty} f(x_{n_k}) = f(c)$?
Nefer
But f(xn) > n
yes
Then f (xnk) -> infinity since k -> infinity
It cant limit at a constant and approach infinity at the same time
yes
Alright let me write it out a bit
you can say $f(x_{n_k}) > n_k$
artemetra
Yeah I made it like this:
Nefer
Is it look good now?
Looks good.
yep
good job
Closed by @vague phoenix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you can also say that by definition there exists $k$ s.t. $f(x_{n_k}) > n_k > f(c)$ leading to a contradiction instantly
artemetra
I see
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello there, where might I get the resources?
@full arch Has your question been resolved?
(btw, help channels are for specific questions)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with fonction affine I don’t rlly understand it
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Everything
Wait no
1
Do you have any questions you'd wanna go over?
Yes I don’t understand the chapter I do understand fonction tho just not fonction affine
So affine functions are functions f specifically of the form f(x) = ax+b, where a,b are constants
When you graph them, they look like lines
If you start at x=0, you will be at y=b
And everytime you move horizontally by 1, you move up (or down, depending on the sign of a) by a
What is constants
Do you already have questions about those facts @ember gate ?
Also I'm guessing you're french, so we can continue in whichever language
Things that don't change
Oh okay
If you pick an affine function f
Yes
Those a and b won't change whereas x can change
@ember gate Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ember gate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@blazing smelt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In triangle ABC PQ is parallel to BC and O is circumcenter of APQ. Circumcircles of PHB and QHC intersect at S. Prove that O,S,H are collinear
I already found some angles, but I don't know how to prove that OSQ=a
It is actually so easy...
.close
Closed by @spring saffron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
here I can get the new equation by considering i-1/2 as x and substituting to original equation as i-1 is subjugate pair. But then a,b,c variables persist, and when I try to find a,b,c I see that they can have many values, so which one should i take? a=k, b=-2k, c=2k. Or am I getting smthing wrong
not sure what you mean
ok see, a,b,c have infinitely many values, so why do we take the simplest one and well, assume a=1?
or do we not assume that at all
i mean yea you can do that
Roots only determine a quadratic up to a nonzero constant multiple
a = k, b = -2k, c = 2k. There are infinitely many versions because multiplying the whole equation by a nonzero constant does not change the roots
So the answer depends on the convention: monic gives coefficient sum 1/2, simplest integer coefficients gives coefficient sum 1
ohhh ic, is there a reason why quadratic expressions with whole number roots are always having a=1 or a factorable "a"
Yeah, the reason is that if the roots are whole numbers r and s, then the quadratic must look like
a(x-r)(x-s)
for some nonzero number a
If we choose a=1, we get the simplest monic polynomial. But a does not have to be 1
Example: roots 2 and 5
(x-2)(x-5) = x^2 - 7x + 10
but also
3(x-2)(x-5) = 3x^2 - 21x + 30
has the exact same roots
OHhh
tysm
So whole-number roots make the factors clean, like (x-r)(x-s). The extra a is just a scale factor
Closed by @distant storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What have you tried?
For a truss like this there is usually no one special shortcut formula for every stick right?
Yes, vectors are exactly the cleaner way
Instead of writing separate sin and cos formulas every time, give every joint coordinates
Then for each bar from point A to point B, make a unit direction vector
Something like:
u = (B - A) / |B - A|
Then you force in that bar is just:
N u
N is the unknown force in the bar
And at each joint you write one vector equation
sum of all bar force vectors + external forces = 0
That equation contains the horizontal and vertical equations
So you don't have to manually write them
N1 u1 + N2 u2 + N3 u3 + F = 0
You too
.close
Do this command
Closed by @willow jackal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
please @ me also if there is a helper helping please do not interupt unless they make a mistake, thanks
my status is 2pi*6
hi , im gonna assume you know the formula for the area of a circle and the formula for the area of a segment
i do
okay so first youll plug in the radius into πr²
36pi
so the area will be π(9)² without taking the fence into account
yes
the length of the rope is 9
m
9² is 9x9, which is 81
yes
so the area without the fence is 81π
yes
with the fence youll need to calculate the area of a segment do you know that
yes
can we call it sector so i dont get confused
sector and segment are different
whats the diff?
ohhh isnt that diametre?
uuuuh the diameter has to be through the centre
ohh so its a straight line anywhere
yeah, the line is called a chord and the two areas are called segments
yea
yes i think you will have to find the angle of the sector
uuuuh the image is not loading pls wait a sec
hi pluto!
-# hi hi dont mind me just observing keep going u got this :3
ok thanks
okay nvm the inage doesnt seem to be loading what is the d that youre talking about
okay sadly not loading
ok pluto can u tell me whats the d
okay imagne circle with center o and sector P and Q imagne line PQ moey is saying that the lin perpedinculat to PQ and goes to CENTER o is of lenth D
it is the distance(perpendicular) of the segment from centre
thank u 😄
(bassicly the D would be = 6 in the example above ((the question)))
ah okay
now i need to find the angle of the segment
so we can find the angle with trigo
cos?
yay
no paper so please accept this sketch
wait no the right angle is between d and the fence
i did it
okay what did you get
its cos i think as we are dealing with the hypotenuse and adjacent
that is only half of the angle btw
360-2(48.19)?
correct
,w 360-2(48.19)
thats the angle
-# yup well done ur pretty much nearly done!!
ik the formula for a sector but not segment
the area of a segment is (1/2)r²(θ - sinθ)
-# its the same idea bassicly its getting the area of THE ENITRE CIRCLE and then dividing into pizza slices so uget the area of each slice
-# but remeber we use Area here instaed
can we use ur way
-# i think this is too direct diamonial maybe we hosuld break into down into sector and segment?
ah okay
-# also sorry for interupting
its fine this is my first time helping
ur doing well
all good 😄
okay so just to explain what diamonail just did this formula is dervided from the sector formula and the traingle area formula.. so its just done all in one go but if you like we can break itdown!
-# ur doing amazing btw!!
keep going!!
yea okay
an alternative to the sector rather than getting the cosine if you don't have a calculator/aren't allowed a calculator is finding the base by pythagorean theorem
notice that the triangle would be an isosceles triangle with base b, which is halfableish into two right triangles with base b/2
w that u can do 9^2=6^2+(b/2)^2
true, its a couple more steps 5ho
-# again this all depends on what level meoy is i m ath hypothetically diamonial answer (using segment rule) is most effecient. but nautilus info is also usefull espaccily if moey doesnt have calc on exam.
cosine is a lot more steps
<@&268886789983436800>
HOLY THAT IS FAST-
so fast
chatbit go brr
hows my answer
√45 × 2 isnt √90
This
i did 45*2 then sqrt
Err
wait i'm not quite following then
2 * sqrt45=sqrt4 * sqrt45 = sqrt(4*45)
you'd have to multiply it by a factor of 4 and also when you're doing that, it carries over
or osmething
carries over to the other side but I'll let the other dude do what they can
-# he used pyhtagerom therom to find half the chord length then did x2 to find the enitre chord (but obv qrt(45) x2 =/= sqrt(90)
-# how long did it take for you to get the better shade of blue as a name
-# err like 2,3 months in discussy
-# I don't have the time damn 🥀
-# can we stop hijacking this thread?
-# @cedar stream would u like to continue?
yes ofc uhh
-# for refrence moey is using the triangle area rule and the sector area rule to find the area we need
-# which is bassicly the long vers of the segment rule.
triangle*
so we get 105.32 as the area of the segment
and we just subtract that from the circle area from earlier
which was 81π
it was π(9)²
-# sorry to intterupt but @spark leaf question why did u use 13.42 as R in the sector rule?
-# what is r again?
sqrt 45 *2
uuh just suggesting you use 2 * sqrt(45) as its a bit less ambiguous
r is 9
probs
-# also sorry for interrupting diamonail just needed to point out the miscalculation tahts all!!
-# @spark leaf if u just redo the last part(wtih correct R) everything should be correct
-# anyways i will let u continue diamonail
ok
okay so we just plug in the correct values
okay so we get 7.06 as the segment area
we subtract 7.06 from the total area of the circle
back he was stuck
πr² r=9
=π(9)²
=81π
-# can't we simply find the area of the greater segment 👀 ?
,w 81pi
-# true but moey does not know segment rule yet.
||true however moey probabky doesnt know||
-# it's just (θ_major / 2π) · π · r² !!
mean
i dont like using stuff i havent learnt in class yet
-# yes but the point of it is to actually solve usnig what he actually knows / took not just giving him a random formula that he still didnt take / understand and tell him to just but the variables in
yess good on you!!!
-# @cedar stream this is your moment ;3
correct!!!!!!
lets check the answer book!
||we pray||
it says 227m
hn
ok lets check the intended solution
ur angle.
let me verify your calcs
in sectoer area.
the angle 48.18 is only HALF of the total angle of the secter.
thats the intnded solution
okay uhh
-# area of traingle seems right.
-# area of sector seems right
-# sector minus traingle area is correct
so its just that we approximated
no-
please give me a minute im calculating this
ok
too big a difference to be an approximation error
-# how did we find the area of minor sector AB without θ / 2π · π·r²? 👀
area of sector
-# same rule just in degrees
-# i also got it as 213??? 😭 maybe i am doing something wrong idk
.
thats the simplest part
thats why we need sqrt(45) x 2 x 6 x 1/2
c^2-b^2
okay so fixing this calcualtion mistake all should be good ;3
idk what to do
fix traingle area!
what values?
-# also iam really sorry fortaking over @cedar stream would u like to conitnue from here?
-# no no i insisit this is ur first time helping i want you (ofc only if you would like) to finish this
-# traingle area we assumed 9 was the based when actually it wasnt.
ohkayy.....
what values do i use
for what exactly ?
-# traingle area.
for the triangles area we can use (1/2)(6)(√45)
so no 9
yers tjat was an error
-# also dontforget an extra x2 cause its two traingles ;3
ok
oop ty
ermmm soooo for the sector area i got
27.878
im stupid
are we on the same page
Why are you calculating for OP
-# op arleady calcualted just made an error thats all.
||by OP do you mean the line OP or original poster||
I assume you know what am i referring to
Great
u frogot the x2 ;3 since only half the base is sqrt(45)
theres two triangles
yay!!!
appreciate it
CONGRATIULATIONSSS!! TO BOTH OF YOU!! 
moey for solving ittt and
diamonial for finish ur first ever help req!!
pizza slicesss ;33
thanks
also i should mention that what u just did with the traingle and sector is bassicly the segment area rule that @cedar stream shared earlier but thats a topic for another time ;3
-# when u take the rule feel free to ask how we got ti here
anyways if ur done dont forget to .close!!
thanks @cedar stream btw!!
dont dont
yww
u have another wuestion?
another topic
post it :3
please @ me, and if there is a helper please do not interupt unless they make a mistake, thanks.
,pin
.pin
yiu will need a protractor and penfil methinks..!
as well as a compass
and ruler : 😹:
euuu i dont think thats what the question meant
-# theeen no one saw that :3 shhhhh sneaks away
Draw out the unit circle and observe.
how do i draw it
never heard of it
a circle with radius 1
can i just use desmos?
-# prefferbly no u dont really need it
we call that a scatter plot
do u know how to get sin cos and tan?
That's what she said, the plot ;-;.
from the unit circle
if you don't i will help but maybe your teacher taught you this
whats next
my teacher taught that yesterday, i wasnt at school at that time
-# that is not of radius 1 but i guess we can just assume that it is of radius 1
it has to be radius one
lets assume it is
forget the values
do u think its better if i learn what a unit circle is from yt?
Draw the radius start from 0,0
Probably
so we'll draw a line with angle theta and theta is being measured from the positive x
axis
and it passes throguh the origin
look at the intersection of the circle and line
yesss exactly
cosine is how far on the x axis the point is
sin is how far on the y axis the point is
and you can find tangent with tanx=sinx/cosx
on what exactly
what is a unit circle
the definition of a unit circle or how to get sin cos tan
a circle of radius 1 with its centre on the origin
-# not to interfere but unit is basicly 1 unit of measurment so unit here means 1 and circle means circle so it means circle with radius of 1
bassicly its like if u put ur hand out and ur hand is 1 meter long and u spin for 360 degrees ur gonna draw a circle with radius 1
what ik so far is a full turn is pi a 90 degree turn is pi/2 a 180 degree turn is 2pi a 270 degree is 3/pi
coreect
-# the set of all points in 2D space whose distances from a centre are all equal to 1!
360° is 2π rad
wait no 270 is 3pi/2
||this may be a little confusing||
it is
π is a half-rotation
2π is a full-rotation
so umm can somone explain how we got the rest of the values?
90° is a quarter rotation
60° is a third of a half-rotation
thus 60° = π / 3
it's all relative to this
can we start 1 by 1
Ok
we begin from 0
why do we have pi/6\
a straight line is 180°
what is a sixth of 180°? it is 30°!
yes
what is 180° equivalent to? it is π !
so a sixth of 180° is a sixth of π
hence 30° = π / 6
is it?
2 pi r
radians is the perimeter or the part of a circumference of a unit circle
we use the perimeter of a unit circle to define rotations
im sorry but i need somone to explain it simpler
we take a full rotation to be 2π
is pluto out there?
-# heyyoooooo 😭
Hmm… maybe 3b1b's animations could help
if u dont want to its fine
he had a video on trigonometry
uhhmm i can try i guessss? 😭 i mean @faint whale and @cedar stream already explained it prettyy well!! but i can try to break it down even more!!
no no ofcourse i will help!!
so a half rotation is 2π/2
a complete rotation is defined as 360°
and it is also defined as 2π
yes
360°=2π
everything else is relative
any factor you scale 360° by, 2π is scaled likewise
okay so first things off remeber arcmeters from earlier you know how they are alternative to degrees?? wehave this thing called radians as in we measure in another way think of it as miles vs kilometers
a half-rotation is half of both 360° and 2π
ik whats radians
180 and pi
what is the third of a half rotation?
or the sixth of a full rotation?
360/6
-# in radians
yes or 2π / 6
ohh so 360 is just 2 pi then i divide it by 6
yes
exactlyyy!! weldoneee!!
but why 6 not anotha value
-# that's why τ is better. rotation is scaled 0 to 1 instead of weird factors in degrees or those multiplied by 2, xd
whats this τ
cause we are looking for the sixth of a full rotation
so we divide by 6
we can look for arbitrary divisions
so a question will say what we looking for?
yes, context will say
correct 👏
now try figuring out a lot of rotations, and always think in π
it's like switching to 24h time format from 12h
ok now how do we get to pi/2 from 2pi/8
90° is a quarter rotation
2π / 4 = 360° / 4
-# pi /2 is = 2pi/4
thank u (IK im stupid)
-# STOP SAYING UR STUPID OR I WILL KICK YOU OFF PLUTO >:c
ok ok
is there 2pi/5 ?
ok i get the part up to pi/2
72°
remeber pi is bassicly a measurment of degreees this is like asking if 72 degrees exsist
-# in the perfect world rotation is defined from 0 to 1 🥲
what do i do after pi/2
wdym
okayy sososo here is the thing
this is the part where u get sin and cos!!
which is pi/2?
pi/2 is 90 degrees
but after it what comes
now now remind me what is sin?
-# Ahh
well idk u can go pi and then 2pi/3 and then 2pi
opposite/hyp
if u want to go 90 - 180 -270 -360
adv?? what is adv??
so sin = opp/hyp right?
now i want you to imagne the side OPPOSITE to the angle that we draw
look at this gif here
think of the sin function as the y-coordinate / altitude of a particular point in the circumference of a unit circle
as the distance from 0 to that point along the curve is what we call radians
you see this? we can think of this (the red line) as SIN because it is opposite to the angle
theres 2 red lines
but the opposite like HAO
-# I like to think of cosine as complementary sine
(they are the same hieght essentiall its just one is drawn on the left for easier understanding)
which is also true!!
yes
YES PERFECT!!
okay soo looking at the gif notice how as SIN gets bigger (taller) cos(width) gets shorter?
and vice versa
yes
this is satisfying
SOO we know that there is ratio between them so now can uimagne having a right angle traingle where R is our hyptonuse
u can imagne us calculating how long each side would be acording to the angle
we use pi stuff?
-# no no thats is just for the angle dw abt that rn
if i tld u that angle A = 45 would u be able to calculate the opp and adj sides?
think of the opposite side as r·sin θ
and the adjacent side as r·cos θ
this is by definition
for r=1, the are equal to the sine and cosine functions
imagine the triangle inside the circe, where hypotenuse r is the radius
cos(0) is 0 no?
0.5
it is from the centre till the circumference
greatar than 0.5
noope think about it at angle 0 how much is the width?/
look at the blue line in the gif!
what's the length from centre till circumference?
-# alright i shall poof
@errant ravine please take over brother
WAI WHA- uhh okay suree!!
no pls
thanks!!
i like u
okay look at this once again
at angle 0
can u make a guess how long the width is?
(cos)
if its 0 then its 0
okay question
at angle 10
look at how long the blue line is
(width)
pretty long right?
yes
it says 0.5
it would get longer right?
xd
yes
that must be why
now imagne it at angle 0
-# huh wdym 😭 Oh its cause its from 0 to 0.5 to 1
CORRECTTT!! using the same logic can u guess how HIGH sin (the hieght) would be at angle 0?
as in sin(0)?
1/2
hmmm nooope think about it
euuu not quite
hmm
look at when the angle is 10 (the red line on the left is very short right?)
0
CORRECTTT!!
yayyy
that is because R at angle 0 PUT YOU AT A POINT where ur as HIGH as the origin so ur at the same hieght!!
yesssss
BUTT now imagne as the angle increases u can imagne sin getting talller
and taller
yes
now look at the gif and make a guess how tall would sin be at 90?
0
yayyyyy
ok im ready
how about angle cos(180)
do u want cos or sin first
sin is -1
why is sin a 180 = -1?
look at the hieght when the angle is 180
wait no
do we have any hieght?
if its 180 sin is 0
cos will be -1
CORRECTTTT!! do u udnerstand why? 👀
isnt that same as 0
thats 90?
yay
that was simple
and we know that tangent is what in terms of sin and cos?
it is really simple!!
its tan
-# although the unit circle has other points but i belive u will probably take that tmr at school.
well tangent = opp/adj right?
tmrw is weekend
i mean next lesson ;3
-# if u want i can explain it to you after this Q but for now u dont need to know all that
tan(x) = sin(x)/cos(x)
yes pls
so its 1/0 or 0/1
okayy so remind me what is sin? and what is cos? as in thier rules 
s=opp/hyp cos=adj/hyp
no
made a mistake
fixed
do u know sohcahtoa?
so if sin = opp/hyp and cos = adh/hyp
and tan is opp/adj then we can say that tan = (opp/hyp) divided by (adj/hyp)
because they are both divided by hyp we can simply say tan = sin/cos
hene what diamonail said here!! ^^
tooo much text i need to break it down 1 sec
u dont need to know this btw just explaining where it came from ;3
tyt!
okay soooo now we can get tan any angle by using our sin and cos!! as diamonail said earlier ^w^
in radius 1 is tan always 1/0 or 0/1
tan isnt always anything it depends on the angle!!
too confusing
of course it is. nothing rendered
-# this is probabbbly too advanced for moey 😭
pls delete it
sorryyy i mean i barely get it too 
all good
should i go do questions?
sure!!
brb
and you already know how to get raidains cause of itsmstiziad and diamonail!!
@errant ravine idk what to do for tan
undifeined or just leave it as 1/0 or -1/0 acordingly
although undefined would be probably be moree coorect
thats only if youre a calculator i tjink!
i am a calculator
do u know what 270° is ?
opp of 90
as in how many full turns
3/4
6pi/4=3pi/2
450 is 360+90 roght?
right yeah
yay
so its 5/4 x 2pi
yes
also, 0° is 0 radians, because its 0 full turns
idk
cmon u can do it
,w 30/360
that
2pi/12
yeep
but what if idk whats 30/360
then u gotta use a calculator
what if its a non calc test
30/360 is the same as 3/36 so no diffuclt when u consider that 3x10 = 30 and 6 is jsut 2 x3
yea
i see
anyways you just have to remember that angle in rad = (angle in deg/360) * 2pi
and you can simplify from there
thanks
ok lemme do 2

