#help-23
1 messages · Page 415 of 1
for example you know HCF is the largest number that divides two or more numbers without leaving a remainder
while the LCM, is the smallest number that is divisible by both numbers
so hcf is a factor
yeah it's in the name
lcm is always the bigger number
i will say one problem pls say it is lcm or hcf
yes LCM is always greater or equal to the HCF
there is a circular path around a sports field, sonia takes 18 mins to completes one round of the circular path while ravi takes 18 mins to complete it. suppose they both start at the same speed,same direction and same time . after how many mins they will meet again at starting point?
in this case it would be LCM
how did you get 12?
oh
in this case it would still be LCM
if they meet again at the starting point. Both must have completed a whole number of rounds and arrive back at the starting point simultaneously
To do that, you would need to find a time duration that is a multiple of both 12 and 18 minutes
and you want the lowest as well
(They also both start together at the same point and same time, moving in the same direction)
@slate tapir Has your question been resolved?
HCF-> finding the largest number that can divide both numbers.
LCM-> finding the smallest number that is divisible by both numbers.
(may be more than two numbers, we shall ignore that for now)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A circle of radius 1 is inscribed in an equilateral triangle of suitable size. Then three more circles are inscribed between the first circle and two sides of the triangle near each vertex. The process continues indefinitely, with progressively smaller circles. What is the sum of the radii of all the circles?
I may be wrong but isn't it just the length from center of triangle to a corner then divide by 2?
but then you have to consider the other circles
where are you stuck?
I am confused on how to start the solution
never dealt with these types of question
You can first try drawing a picture
if you haven’t done that yet
always try drawing a picture when you encounter a geometry problem
I have the picture
Ok, could you send it here?
Yeah
intuitively you would find a general term for each radii
which would be some ratio
how would you get a ratio in geometry?
and then you would have a geometric series
so the problem boils down to finding the ratio
and also try to give things variable names
until you can get equations relating the variables
for example, give a variable name to the radius of the central circle, and all the other infinitely many circles
hmm, I don't quite get the idea for finding the ratio
Let's say, ro be the radius of initial circle and r1 be the radius of second
Then we have ro=1 but we don't have any information of r1
so how do I find the ratio?
My point was that you can guess intuitively that r_0/r_1 = r_1/r_2 = r_2/r_3 and so on
and so you can find the sum of all the radii as a geometric series from this
so the hard part is just finding the ratio
Are you allowed to use trigonometry?
Yes
There are no strict set of rules
sure, really appreciated
alright wait
I got AR=ro√3 and CR=r1√3
and from similarity I ended up getting ro/r1=ro/r1 😭
where did I go wrong
consider: OB = OA + BC
huh
that would just be ro+r1
@pulsar pecan could u elaborate the essence behind doing OB=OA+BC which is basically ro+r1?
I tried to do OA/BC =AR/CR through similarity to find the ratio which didn't go well
yeah and OB is twice (OA - BC) too
I think this idea is used in finding radii of Ford circles or something
Got the r1=1/3
so for rn it would basically be (1/3)^n which is geometric series?
But the thing that's bugging me is how ro+r1=2(ro-r1)
because of trig ratios
yeah, r_n would be that, because you can apply homotheties/similarities
this is why I made the angle red
uhmm, so sorry but I don't understand anything about it besides being 60😓
oh wait I think I get it
sin30=ro/OR
which gives OR=2ro
Similarly, sin30=r1/BR which gives BR=2r1
and OB=OR-BR
so 2(ro-r1)
is this right?
Yes
No worries
Next time, please send any working you’ve got so you can be helped faster
like in this case where you could send the picture
(which you had drawn)
Sure!
Alright, I didn't know the approach to this. Thanks
Also generally you can just try giving things variable names and see how far you can get; if you’d noticed that trig ratio, then you’d be done with the ratio-finding and then have solved the problem
Will definitely keep that in mind, thanks again
You’re welcome!
If you’re done for now, then you can type .close to close the channel
.close
Closed by @solar sand
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you do D? do you need to do linear interpolation?
you can look at other past papers; do these kinds of questions usually ask you to do linear interpolation?
@stiff nest Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stiff nest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The ques, its of 11th standard maths ques…. Ik its easy but i wanted to ask like in main exam if this stuff of question comes, can i say like “as n is Natural number therefore let n=1 and solve the ques and then say “similarly with other” or have to do a proper shi? If have yo do a proper thing then can anyone help me out what to write or yk
The solution seems to be of induction.
Do you know what induction is?
mathematical induction
Nahh…
what are you asking?
The problem seems to be of induction; are you sure you haven't studied it before?
Am js asking, can i do the ques in exam by taking the values of “n” or have to prove it by a yk format of idk
I havent heard of it…. But this ques is of Sets chapter and idk more abt that…
are you sure you've never seen induction before
prove a property holds for n=0 or 1, then prove that it holds for n=k+1 given it holds for n=k
Base Case and Inductive Step. it's better to write:\
Base Case: Let $n=1$.\
....end of the proof for $n=1$\\
Inductive step: Now, assume the assertion (write the question) to be true for all numbers $n=1,...k$. Consider the validity of the statement for $k=1$:\
(write proof)\\
Since the statement is true for $n=k+1$, thus by the principle of mathematical induction, it is true for all natural $n$. \\\
This will actually depend a lot on your prof, and his/her marking scheme.
Annie Maqionde
you can't just like say you do it like another question, you have to actually do the proof (is that what you're asking?)
can you show the rest of this solution? what are you confused about on it?
Uhm wait a sec, let me show book solution which i yk
Uhm ig thats why i cant understand the proof… cuz i havent heard abt that yk…
No then you can just say\
Consider first $n=1$.\
Then go on with the rest of your proof
Annie Maqionde
it is my serious and grave error, it is not induction.
I apologize
Ohhh….
So i can do like this right? @warm warren
can you follow the proof? which line exactly is confusing you
I feel OP has a doubt in how to present it.
do you know what the binomial theorem is
@hybrid basin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have no idea what the complex numbers are
So I do not know how to work through this problem
I already tried doing usual algebraic manipulation
and just got to the trivial solution for the scalars
I am working on problem b)
Note that your scalars can be complex
I assume you implicitly assumed the scalars are real and set real part = imaginary part = 0
Note that your scalars can be complex
but that doesn't work because of this
yes
I am thinking of using reciprocals
Maybe that works
using reciprocals could work
why are reciprocals so important in complex analysis?
I have not studied complex numbers
All I remember vaguely is someone using reciprocals with complex numbers
to simplify
they allow division to be well-defined for points in a 2d plane ig
and that encodes things like scaling and rotation
tbf you don't need reciprocals though
When do I learn about this stuff formally?
mm
uhhhhh idk
they'd probably do it to some level in complex analysis
but it's not unreasonable to study complex numbers in high school or for comp math
I thought so too
australia, the uk, ireland, etc come to mind as countries that teach about complex numbers (albeit to varying levels) in high school
Well, let's not work with reciprocicals
unless they come off naturally to the solution
you can give a pair of (nonzero) scalars in ten seconds with no computation
that's my hint
think simple (and maybe a bit troll)
Okay
@tardy mango I had also tried rewriting the scalars in complex form
Would that have worked?
Hint: ||ab+(-ba)=0||
sure, but that is too much effort (and you get an undetermined system anyway so you'd need to take some creative liberty in picking values for certain components if you want a concrete numeric answer)
I just ended up with two unknowns
That hinted me at the proof being true, but I don't have the tools to prove it
What about choosing a = -i, b = i?
a pair of scalars in parametric form
but again, too much work.
try it
(-i + -2i) + (i - 2i) = 0
(-4i) = 0
It is wrong
I should add a real part
is this supposed to relate to $ab+(-ba)=0$ or is this reusing $a$, $b$ for something else
Civil Service Pigeon
Something else
I multiplied a by 1+i, and b by 1-i
ok
-4(sqrt -1) = sqrt 4?
Civil Service Pigeon
I mean
$\sqrt{ab}=\sqrt{a}\sqrt{b}$ works for $a,b \geq 0$
Civil Service Pigeon
you can't necessarily say the same if one of them is negative
consider how you can make this "match" $c_1 (1+i)+c_2 (1-i)=0$
Civil Service Pigeon
again, be very lazy
I feel like you're getting there but idk if the numbers work out
(10 + i)(1 +i) = (10 + 10i) + (i - 1)
-(10 + i)(1-i) = -[(10 - 10i) + (i + 1)]
Now we add them
(9 + 11i) + (9i - 11) @tardy mango
this looks really good
9 + 11i = 11 - 9i looks really bad
Civil Service Pigeon
Then,
,texsp ||$$ab+(-ba)=0 \implies (1+i)(1-i)+(-1+i)(1+i)=0.$$
Setting $c_1=1+i$ and $c_2=-1+i$ yields
$$c_1 (1-i)+c_2 (1+i)=0$$
and so we are done since $c_1$, $c_2 \neq 0$.||
Civil Service Pigeon
Closed by @quick wraith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Any suggestions on how to proceed?
Hum. Maybe complete the square and trig sub eventually?
So my attempt at simplification won't be able to lead to anything?
Maybe you could set u = sqrt(what you have) and rewrite everything in u. Should be left with rational functions at least.
Then a bunch of partial fractions await
But when I sub in for dx I'll have a bunch of terms in x
You would be able to rewrite them in terms of u.
Either that or im tripping
So we would have $u=\sqrt{1+\frac{1}{x}$. And then $du= \frac{1}{-2}\frac{1+\frac{1}{x}}^{-1/2}$
BigBen
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
What about the 1's?
I got something, idk if its correct tho
Wdym?
Wait I think the trig sub works. Let me do it completely
I didn't think it through. Now I just need to integrate sec^3x
Yep
@copper shadow Has your question been resolved?
.solved
Closed by @copper shadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how da hell do i do dis
use (a+b)^2 = a^2 + 2ab + b^2
why would that help
do you see the quantity squared here
use this and expand
Closed by @stiff nest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Was just wondering if this graph was correct, the question is asking to sketch one continuous curve with the following characteristics listed in image.
just fix f(1) = 1 requirement
your f(1) looks a tad high
maaaaaybe smooth this out a little more so that f'(4) = 0
everything else looks good though 
Ok ty but im just confused about this
.
why
@dusk walrus if you're done with this channel, type ".close" to lock it 
@dusk walrus Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dusk walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help
Hi, the 3 angles inside a triangle add up to 180.
So 180-46-77 is 57, which is the last angle in the triangle.
A line has an 180 angle.
So X is 180-57 (123 degrees)
Closed by @hallow agate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am tring to make a ai that can learn amost like a human anyone there to make the math?
idk anyone can help?
Not what help channels are for
Yes
"making the math" is so simple, of course ask it in a math discord help channel
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @static light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hint for this problem pls. topic is pigeonhole principle
hint i got:One country has 330 members. Take the largest number and subtract the others from that country.
It's multi step pigeonhole
This doesn't seem trivial anyway. Hmm...
Closed by @ancient kernel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Would I use this formula for this question?
@lilac relic Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lilac relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the img quality too bad
in this question i didnt understand where exactly i can begin so i just need a little kickstart i guess
$\lim_{x\to \infty} \frac{(2x+1)^{40}(4x-1)^5}{(2x+3)^{45}}$
Copter
yeah
Have you tried anything?
Oh sorry just read this
Okay
no i didnt understand what i can take as my first step
Hint: The sum of powers in the numerators is 40+5 = 45, and the denominator is 45 too.
ohh okay
how can i use it because the bases are different right
At infinity, the high order terms are the only ones that matter, right?
Your first strategy would be to somehow replace the $x$ terms with $1/x$ by multiplying/dividing by a suitable number(hint: here, its some power of $1/x$)
Annie Maqionde
yeah i think
What is the highest order term in (2x+1)^40 you think?
oh x^40
No need for an exact answer
So we gotta figure out those coefficients
Yeah
oh wait
So, lets ignore literally every other term and simplify the whole numerator to that product
What would it be
so since its tending to inf we can negate the other terms?
Yep!
Coming back to this
did i make an error somewhere
because according to our module's solution
the ans should be does not exist
Sorry I was distracted by something
oh okay np
This is exactly correct I yhink
It should be 32
But why did u write 3^2 at the end
Oh it's 32
Oh LOL
Sorry for the bad writing 😭
😭 😭 😭 😭
I guess error in the book then
If you are trying to evaluate [
\lim_{x\to\infty}\4{x^2+2x+3}{4x^2+5x+6}
]
You can factor $x^2$ from both the numerator and denominator to get
[
\lim_{x\to\infty} \4{\cancel{\0b{x^2}}\8{1 +\52x +\53{x^2}}}{\cancel{\0b{x^2}}\8{4 +\55x +\56{x^2}}}
]
The rest of the terms all converge to 0 as they approach infinity. Leaving you with [
\lim_{x\to\infty}\414
]
Writing this on phone was NOT it
Polynomial of degree n/polynomial of degree n
Notice something?
Just a small remark, you factor out x^2, not 1/x^2.
Ah thanks good catch
no not rly
ohhh and how exactly did we use this here
Oh its the same situation really
Its just that your numerator and denominator's polynomial are reaaaaally big
If you multiply them out, you get a bunch of terms but if you factor out the highest-order term, all of the rest converge to 0
Similar to my example above
Yeppiee
Aighty np
Closed by @proud carbon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
$$ Lim x-> inf ((a_n)x^n + (a_n-1)x^(n-1)+ ....... + a_0)/(((b_n)x^n + (b_n-1)x^(n-1)+ ....... + b_0) $$
Try this
wick
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
<@&268886789983436800>
Bro will return in avengers Doomsday
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A person walks in a straight line at a constant speed of 2 m/s.
a. Draw the position vs. time graph assuming the motion starts at the origin.
b. Draw the position vs. time graph assuming the motion starts 1 m from the origin and the object moves away from the origin.
c. Draw the velocity vs. time graph assuming the motion starts at the origin.
d. Draw the velocity vs. time graph assuming the motion starts 1 m from the origin and the object moves away from the origin.
the question was translated from another language so if something needs clarifying let me know
I tried doing a, and b, but I don't have the answers so can anyone help me? How do I know if my graph is correct
this is my attempt for a. and b.
Well since you haven't provided more context (is there anything else given?), the graphs are right
But, for future,
please either label which line is what
or use two graphs.
that's the whole question
label it as "a" ?
I'd label it as $\mathrm{a)}$
Annie Maqionde
But its your personal choice
Have you tried c and d? Where are you stuck in them, if you are?
I'm trying to do it now, but wouldn't they look the same as the first graphs but instead the graph represents V?
c would be identical to a, I suppose
it's most probably given to confuse you with pos-time and vel-time
it would be the same, so like this?
the y-axis would be labeled v
and change the labellings on the y-axis
its no longer 1 m
its 1 m/s
ohh wait I missed a line from the question
the beginning is
A person walks in a straight line at a constant speed of 2 m/s.
sorry
the second graph would be a straight line wouldn't it? since the speed is constant
then im afraid you'll have to correct all four graphs.
Ok
what's wrong about a?
A is correct mb.
I assume b is correct as well because it's the same graph with the same slope except that it starts from 1m instead of 0
if we change y to instead be X(v) in m/s
wouldn't that mean that the graph would be simply a straight line as the speed is constant?
c and d would be simply the function v(t) = 2 wouldn't it
are you talking about uniform rectilinear motion?
I have no idea what that is
the motion with s(t)=vt and v constant
with zero initial conditions
Anyway, I think what you mean is that the body always remains in the same position.
no
and what is the question?
in the question it's given that the person walks in a straight line at a constant speed of 2 m/s.
to travel a straight line means that it moves with uniform rectilinear motion
if you put yourself in a real situation
Does saying you walk in a straight path mean that your position changes at the right time?
I think this is what the graph would look like for c, and d
here's the question @covert rain
This graph means that your position does not change over time but always remains the same
it's the very beginning of physics introduction so like highschool level
sorry I meant to write 2m/s
x(t) = x0
so y represents velocity
I repeat, it means that you always remain still in the same position
if this is the graph of the position
c. Draw the velocity vs. time graph assuming the motion starts at the origin.
how come if y represents velocity at m/s and not position
so you use X(m) to represent position and X(v) to represent velocity?
no worries, are my graphs correct for the questions?
yes, is that what was asked of me in c. and d.?
perhaps origin means t=0
so v0=2m/s
c is correct
since the velocity is constant and does not depend on the position I assume that the graph of c is the same as that of d
yeah that's what I also thought
its just X(v)=v0
maybe they said that in d to see if I'd confuse position with velocity
could be
"asssuming the motion starts at the origin" means I have to draw it starting at (0,0)? even though it's 2m/s?
or is this the correct way
since the text clearly says that the speed is 2
I assume you mean that t0=0
this practically means that the body leaves at time t=0
wait, wouldn't that mean that at d where it says "assuming the motion starts 1 m from the origin " the motion would start at t = 1?
meters is not time
It means that you start from a slightly further forward position but still at time t=0
It's like saying that two people have to run but one of them already has a 1 meter advantage at the start, but both of them still start at the same time which in this case is t=0
I see
this solution is incorrect right?
d. would be correct but c wouldn't
In your opinion, does solution c represent the motion of a person traveling at 2m/s?
yeah to me it seems like it represents v = 0
so does that mean the person is not moving at speed 2?
since v is costant
do you know derivatives?
yeah that makes sense it would start at (0,2)
also is it fine that I wrote X(v)?
as y?
How does your teacher write them?
I'm not sure what X(v) means exactly and how it is different from writing v like the other person did
for position I remember the teacher writing X(m)
but I'm not sure what she writes for velocity
It seems to represent the position with the large letter and then inside the brackets you put a unit of measurement
but here he only writes V
the gap here does not feel right
true
it is your point a right?
here's my final solution for a and b
notice that there is a connection between points a and b
yeah they have the same slope
no sorry
which is velocity
velocity = 2?
this is an imporant thing
so this would be my final graph for c and d
so at point a he asked you to represent the motion starting from the origin, right?
yeah
what is the slope in that graph?
in graph c? 1?
in the graph a
2
ok
this means v0=2
so at point c why should it be 0?
i mean not the slope in this case
i mean v0
origin means (0,0) which is what's asked in question c, since v = 2, (0,2) still satisfies what's asked of me?
the origin in this case its t=0 i suppose
It could also mean that you have to represent the speed of point a) which is a motion that starts from the origin
wait if x is t(s) then y should be v(m/s) instead of X(v) no?
this is correct , as I said before I think it wants to represent the graph of the speed of the motion of point a) which starts from the origin
this notation of V is from the teacher ?
no that's a student
this labelling would be the correct way right?
so this
Do you have any examples from the teacher?
you could see from there
or from the book if the teacher uses the same notations
right the book
there's a graph where the book uses v[m/sec] and t[sec]
yeah I think that's the correct way
what I did should be correct
above 1? just some leftovers I didn't notice when I erased stuff
it's not a problem
I'm just saying that it doesn't mean that the body leaves at time t=1s
yes
okay, thank you
so a and b are the same graph except that for one the initial position changes, while c and d are the same
Closed by @bronze yoke
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok so
Hi
boxplot? Which formula? Do you know that $Q_2, Q_1, Q_3$ are?
Annie Maqionde
Can anyone solve this question (i) and (ii) part
yes
my teacher is so deadass bruh i canr even understand her
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
do you know how to calculate Q_1, Q_2, Q_3?
which specific formula did you forget?
Hi
if you want to learn, khan academy exists
!redir
This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.
tbh all of em since my teacher is deadass
Ohh
@wispy jacinth
@wispy jacinth Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wispy jacinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
having some confusion graphing functions with transformations,
specifically on the order i'm supposed to do the transformatiosn in and i cant find any good sources
Do you have a specific example?
its just pemdas
i assume you are taught the form
b ( a(x - h) ) + k or something similar


i flowkenuinley forgot how to use texit
Just write it in text
y = -3log_2 (-(x-4)) + 1
I don't see the point being made about pemdas, but I am happy to let angel explain that
then the y-axis reflection, then the x axis reflection and the vertical stretch, then the vertical shift?
apply your transformations in the order you would evaluate the function
so that means x - 4 then the -(...)
Closed by @pulsar hill
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why the eigenvalues of $HH^\dagger$ are always non-negative?
Custos Caeli Invictus
$H^\dagger = \overline{H}^T$
Custos Caeli Invictus
Consider det(A*B) = det(A) * det(B)
And what are the properties of a hermitian matrix.
I don't remember why this is true 🙁
Anyway
$det(H H^\dagger) = det(H) det(H^\dagger)$
Custos Caeli Invictus
Is H supposed to be a hermitian matrix or an arbitrary matrix?
Custos Caeli Invictus
$det(H) \overline{det(H)} = |det(H)|^2 \ge 0$
Custos Caeli Invictus
So the total determinant is non-negative
@split kayak and now?
<@&286206848099549185>
But in theory what I found only implies that the product of eigenvalues is not negative but it does not mean that all eigenvalues are ≥ 0
@split moss Has your question been resolved?
Does H have eigenvalues or is it not diagonalizable?
right, can you say anything about the eigenvalues of Hbar from the eigenvalues of H?
@split moss Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Considering the values you found for R2 and r, include in your paragraph a statement
regarding whether you believe there is a linear association, how well you believe the model
fits the data, and why you believe those things.
Ah ok. So if both are low, there is a weak linear association?
yup
although the sign of r just indicates the direction of the relationship
That's why we use r squared to determine the strength
Hmmmm but I also have to see how well I believe the model fits the data. My scatter plot looks chaotic.
@wise hill Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im sorry, please translate
ummmmm
And you haven't told us where you're stuck, too.
i need hel;p with ב.(1)
Yes so may you translate?
angle ABD equal to angle ACD?
Yes i need to know why it does
Have you heard of cyclic quadrilaterals?
what about it
Hint: AD is a chord and it subtends the angles ACD and ABD at two different points on the circumference.
Does a theorem.......now strike you as oddly familiar to what I wrote above?
so they are equal because they both lean on AD?
so two angles thats lean on the same chord are equal
therefore ACD=ABD
Hello, Fellow Companions. I'm Roagi's Partner and we would love to get some help.
they helped👍
@warm warrenthanks
.close
Closed by @tropic marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I sent the divided x to the 37
Why
Because otherwise you would change the equation
1/2 + 1/2 = 1
according to your logic we can do
1/2 + 1 = 2
I think he only multiplied the right hand side and not the left hand side too
Because: revise basics of equations...
Ok
@fickle mantle Has your question been resolved?
whats the issue now?
-# as said here, you cant just shift the x individually
else ur doing this
so here you would need to multiply by x on both sides!
which in turn will "remove" the x in denominator and give you a QE in x
yuh
you can
but you can also factor it
what are two numbers that multiply to 60 and add to -17
Is t it 51 and. It 60
what
I got 51
for?
How is it 20
for ax^2 + bx + c
you consider the things that multiply into a*c
not a*b
Can u reword this
I don’t understand
So to speak
For ax² + bx + c = 0
Consider two numbers p and q
For factorizing the equation, you look for p and q such that
p+q = b
pq=ac
Then you write b = p + q
Honestly this is standard theory thats covered in class at some point
But its hard to understand the logic behind factorization of quadratics until youre familiarized with polynomials
$(x - a)(x - b) = x^2 + (a + b)x + ab$, that's why you look for 2 numbers like so
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
Precisely
but sometimes you don't need to factor to solve for $x$, you could also complete the square
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity

Where’s the - from
Yes but the c is positive
Yeah
Quadratic formal
no
just think of this
Ohh 5 and 12
almost
5 and 12
But that,l make it -60
what happens if i multiply a negative with a negative
Positive
so...
Ur smart ty everyone
u r not done tho
so like
3b^2 - 17b + 20 = 0 -> 3b^2 - 12b -5b + 20 = 0
how do you finish this

(incidentally, holy crap you structured this better than some of my students)
(A lot of them almost always ignore the "=0" part altogether
)
Oh
we used to have a very active highschool/middleschool teacher here but they removed her from the server
Cool
Why
what is the question?
You have 2(x+y) = 39,2
-# i cant tell if its a decimal
And xy = 96
2*96 = 192 not 196 btw
you can make a system between the area and the perimeter
-# This is the sort of mistakes i make on my tests 💀
Oh
otherwise the logic is fine tbh
Yep
A system?
Oki
yes
thats already what u r doing
like this
skittles always asks good questions
yeeted that denominator at the end
never forget to put which variable you're solving for
write 0.64 as a fraction
ok imma dip there are too many people helping now
@fickle mantle Has your question been resolved?
Do uk the formula for speed pls
For question f
distance divided by time
In general, average speed is
Total distance/total time
Imma check f once tho, gimme a sec
Ty both of u
welcome do u need the solution for the f part?
I think I subtracted 30 form 180 to find the rerunning distance
no thats wrong
I dont think thats correct
time to ceres is - 180/ x and time bck home is 180/x-30
so it the equation to do it will be 180/x-30 - 180/x = 1
The problem says she travelled she travelled 30km/h slower while goign home
so 90-30= 60 so the speed was 60km/h
and her speed while going to Ceres was 90km/h sos its 60km/h
hope this helps you
I don’t understand
okay should i re explain it
Yes pls
okay wait im typing it
Km is distance right
Yes
So we can make her normal speed as = x - 30km/h beacuse the questions said she was 30 km/h slower
now we use the formula Time=distacne divided to speed
time going there = 180 divided to x
time coming back = 180 divided to (x - 30)
and in the question it said she lost 1 hr on the trip back to home so
180 divided to (x - 30) = 180 divided to x + 1
u there?
It’s ok
No sorry
oh
Erm so the returning part of the question is the speed right?
yeah
-# Can't you use /
i thoguht she wouldnt understand
Can u explain the question first ppls
we have to find the speed the lady traveled back in
i told u the equation
It’s the same thing
Just my school using a the point as a comma
I don’t understand
you ask e) right
Yes
Uh I can’t explain
so have you formed the equation
factorize
I'm making a guess - South Africa?
Howd uk
(because then that would be the right way to write a decimal)
One of the other questions uses the S. African rand
(the real check I wanted to do was confirm the decimalisation - that does apparently seem to be the standard in Afrikaans, so I wouldn't be surprised if that's the standard as a nation)
I have no idea what ur saying
Using a comma for a decimal point is typical in Afrikaans
So it's not a school thing to write it like that, as such, but a national thing, was my point
Regarding question (f)? No, because that's not what the "time" in speed/distance/time equations is about
"time" refers to the time taken to travel a distance
can u explain speed, distance and time to me
It s even a while since I pre die. Questions lie, these
(average) speed, by definition, is distance travelled divided by time taken
This equation
Honestly, a pretty decent explanation is here
'cept to clarify this last line -
180 / (x-30) = (180/x) + 1
why do we use time
(where x is the speed the lady travels at when heading to Ceres)
As opposed to...?
what they said
?
What they said uses time, so I'm not sure I get what your question is
If you want, an equivalent approach to the question can go as follows:
I kind of understand
Let s be the speed she travels to Ceres (in km/h), and t the time it takes her (in hours)
The distance form where she is is 180km and she was traveling at a slower speed when returning than when travelling to. So the unknown speed minus the slower speed
Then since speed = distance/time i.e. that distance = speed x time, we have st = 180
what’s st
s times t
from here
Oh
(it's what Aarna used x for)
From this - if we look at the return journey and do the same thing, she's travelling at (s - 30) km/h, for an hour longer (i.e. (t + 1) hrs), across the same distance (180 km)
So (s - 30)(t + 1) = 180
So now we have two equations, and two unknowns -
st = 180
(s-30) (t + 1) = 180
Simultaneous equations - solve however you like
why do we use the distance form,USA
Formula
I understand everything you’ve said so far
I get the feeling you don't tbh
wdym why?
We're told information about speed, about distance and about time; what other formula is there to consider?
Oh
No I do understand
I just dirnt know why u used the distance as a subject formula
Instead if the rest
Idk how to explain
It makes sense in my head
Fundamentally it doesn't matter what the subject of the formula is
20 = 4 x 5 and 4 = 20 / 5 are practically speaking the same
The point is to get some equations with which we can attempt to solve for some variables
.close
Closed by @fickle mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to evaluate this limit