#help-23
1 messages · Page 410 of 1
wait what
didnt i do that?
Theres an easy way to show that 3k + 3 divides the other expression considering that this is a polynomial
oh mb didn't see it
time to recall your calc classes ig
so uh yeah, you can already factorize by 3, 3k^3+9k²+15k+9 = 3(k^3+3k²+5k+3)
your problem is about factorizing k^3+3k²+5k+3 by k+1
long division
Noooo 

pleaase
you can be way smarter than using long division, for example, (k+1)^3 = k^3+3k²+3k+1, add 2(k+1) on both sides and done
but there are at least 3 or 4 smart ways to do it
You could just test for the quite obvious root
I automatically think of long division 
k = 1?
-1 i mean sorry
As i was trying to hint that
If the degree 3 polynomial we have here is divisable by 3(k+1), then what does that mean?
I have no idea how calculus can show thi
Id assume youre not too far into calculus then, right?
I mean depends, i may know
There are multiple ways to express any given polynomial
One of them is the obvious one
uhh
oH
if u sub in k = -1, u get
0
?
yeaa
oh my so u can litreally just do that
If a polynomial P(x) has a root "x0", then that means that it can be written as P(x) = Q(x) * (x-x0)
Where Q is another polynomial of 1 degree less
And even so, if it so happened that k = -1 was not a root of P(k)
Then the original statement was false
oh wait i think i saw this tech somewhere
so you have a <==> (if and only if) relation
ok wait i got it divisible. so i know it is divisible by k = -1, but this shows (k + 1) is a factor, not 3(k + 1) right?
3 is a constant
so do i nede to factorise 3 from 3k^3 + 9k^2 + 15k + 9
and then show k = -1 for factorised bracket = 0?
You could go to try with both
You will notice that theres only a 1/3 difference in factors.
i dont understand sorry?
gimme a sec
The threes are only constants
And for polynomial division, factors dont alter the condition for divisibility
You could divide any combination of the 4 versions for these polynomials between eachother and they will always work
Since "factors" for us, are not scalar (real) numbers, but our polynomial factors of the form (x - a)
so 4(k+1) is a factor too?
consider that in the expression 3(k+1) the three is not part of the factor itself
its only the k + 1 part-
okay. but if its divisible by (3k+3), then wouldnt 3 be like part of the division too?
Its divisible by (k+1), it turns out that (3k+3) is just a way we write 3(k+1)
The polynomial would be divisable for (4k+4), (7k+7), etc....
For our case, we care about 3k+3 because its what we got from the a+b+c expression
It will be easier if u chose n-1 n n+1
yeah i saw that in the solns. is this just intuition?
Ye u just need to realise that calculating (n+2)^3 is harder than (n-1)^3
The lazier u are the more you’re convergingto the right answer
@proven smelt Has your question been resolved?
thanks guys
Closed by @proven smelt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whats BN?
What have you done?
nothing idk what is BN
feel question has typo 
Missing spaces?
no i feel the point b/w B and C is N but idk.
N here is something else idk
so the question is wrong?
cuz this is from an old test if theres something wrong they wouldve meantionned it
feel like N is on BC
@cerulean dune Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cerulean dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can any1 send the working for this
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
@solar inlet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
use rule 2!
(this is incomplete r*log(a) = log(a^r), and the change of base, vice versa)
Oh
Oh
I am so dumb
I just did rlog(a)

no worries, you might just be confused, without a calculator this is not too trivial either
lemme try now
the question can be solved using rule 1 and rule 2 only tho, keep that in mind!
yeah i realized that
i think i can do it now
why not rule 3 and then rule 1?
rule 3 then rule 1 would make it really ugly when it doesnt need to be
im assuming youre raising 16/15 to the power of 7?
you have a pretty interesting website btw, some of them were nice reads
type .close when youre done
it reduces to log2
oh thank you
i just started my 11th grade. i will continue to explore my artistic side 😭
.close
Closed by @upper forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
mm thats cool!
oh this works too, yes, i did not see that
youre right @dense furnace
it’s ok , you learned something new today 🫶
hahaha no i got tunnel visioned, splitting it into a bunch of log 2s and log 3s and log 5s and subtracting and adding is also pretty satisfying
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do part b
@daring sonnet Has your question been resolved?
The conjugate root theorem gives you $-1-\sqrt{7}i$ is also a root
Civil Service Pigeon
and by vieta's the sum of the roots is -3/2
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
But the last root is x = 1/2
how do i ask
Mhm. Your point is?
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
,w -3/2 - (-1-i sqrt 7)-(-1+i sqrt 7)
@daring sonnet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
sadly i had some internet issues so im gonna reask the question as i couldnt reply to the messages
regarding this working out, i am unsure how it goes from line 1 to line 2
because shouldnt it be done like this?
you can factor it out
but what is wrong with my approach
huh what is?
this
your approach looks fine
this is the worked out solution
the black crossed outline is me
are you cancelling the denominator out fully?
yes
ah
because there are 2 terms on the top
but ive seen something really similiar
maybe it didnt have the subtraction sign in the middle...
$\frac{x}{x^2} = \frac{1}{x}$
hmm
MxRgD
yes
as an example
i know that
the x doesn't get fully canceled
yeah
but there is 2 terms on the numerator not one
right but you can factor it out
yeah
thats true
i think im mixing it up if they were all being multiplied
because lets say that subtraction sign was a multiplication sign
yes as long as you don't fully cancel out the denominator
wait u would
e
wait
okay
now it should be fine
2 terms on top, 2 terms on bottom
no this is a new case
suppose it wasnt a subtraction
ah okay
then yeah you can cancel fully
so the denominator becomes 1, right?
yep
np
.solved
Closed by @fringe dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hlo
mhm
Asking the actual question right away is more likely to get responses.
Asking "Can I ask...?" or "Does anyone know about...?" doesn't give people enough information to decide whether they can help, and answering can feel like a promise to help with the actual question, which they might find themselves unable to.
proof that if n was not a multiple of 5 then the rest of n^4/5 is 1
do you know modular arithmetic?
I would greatly appreciate the help
yes
(In the future, please make the first message you send the actual question since that's what the bot pins. This saves us the effort of having to change the pin manually.)
then just do each case
u mean 5k+1 5k+2....
Yes use this table for x²
Then x⁴
There are another way
You want to prove 5|x⁴-1
Means 5|(x-1)(x+1)(x²+1)
for x=1(mod5) or x=-1=4(mod5) it's done
Now you can just prove for x=0(mod5), x=2(mod5) and x=3(mod5)
@daring orchid Has your question been resolved?
oh
mention me
-# mark the bot else it will close the channel
proof that if n was not a multiple of 5 then the rest of n^4/5 is 1
this is my question
what do you mean by "the rest of n^4/5"?
The rest of the division
or remainder
oh
Yeah for x is a multiple of 5
Means x=0(mod5)
In this case x⁴-1=4(mod5)
So you can do check it for x=2,3(mod5)
remainder
Or you can just prove it with Fermat's little theorem
x is not a multiple
of 5
So you want to prove that if x not multiple of 5
Then x⁴=1(mod5)
i want to proof that if x is not a multi then the remainder of n^4 divasible by 5 is 1@spark stump
Do you know modular arithmetic?
first you'd represent x as 5k + m, where k is an integer and m is any integer in [1, 4]
yes at least
انتي عربية؟
تمام نتحدث بالعربية
انت مش عربي؟
لا أنا عربي
من أي دولة
الجزائر
لا احكي عربي
والنعم
تمام
انتي تريدين إثبات أن باقي قسمة x⁴ على 5 هو 1
اذا كان x ليس مضاعف ل5
اوكي
نعملها بالطابلو
-# .
I'm not finished
1
Yeah ik just reminding you to rewct with the cross so that bot doesnt close
اذا كم ستكون x⁴ mod 5
1
4
و x⁴ mod 5
1
لأن x=5(mod5)
هي نفسها x=0(mod5)
لأن
5=0(mod5)
وفي هذه الحالة يعني أن x مضاعف ل5
وأنت لا تريدين إثباتها في حالة x مضاعف ل5
علاش منديرش 6 مالا
ولا 7
علاش تحبس عند 4
بصح معلبالكش لازم تجرب كل الاعداد
مثال 124342534
فالرياضيات يخي متقدرش تدير حاجة بلا برهان
ولا تخدم ب n
هو علبالي بلي هدرتي غالطة بصح حاب نفهم علاه
لكن الmodular arithmetic
جاءت لتسهيل الحسابات
في هذه الحالة هناك شيء يسمى
Classe d'équivalence
والعمل عليها فقط يعتبر بمثابة العمل على جميع الحالات
وشنوا هيا هذي
بالنسبة ل5 نأخذ الأعداد الصحيحة الطبيعية الأصغر من 5 ونعمل عليها
Classe d'équivalence الخاصة ب5
هي 0,1,2,3,4
سما ديما كاين هذا الدوران
نعم في هذه الحالة x كم تساوي
نعم
<@&268886789983436800>
و كم باقي قسمة 6 على 5
1
ماذا عن 1086074569806
مثال
لازم تجرب
لا تستطيع التكهن مسبقا
هذا لديك
1086074569806=108607456980×10+6
=108607456980×2×5+6
هذا العدد باقي قسمته على 5 هو 6
وباقي قسمة 6 على 5 هو 1
اذا باقي قسمة هذا العدد على 5 هو 1
الأمر يعتمد بشكل كبير على كيفية تعاملك مع الرقم
Closed by @daring orchid
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
why have there been so many of them
Easter special
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hints wanted: volume of an n-ball
using various integral calculus methods i've found the area of a circle (in terms of its circumference), the volume of a sphere, and the surface area of a sphere.
i've also found that for an n-ball, the relationship of its volume to its surface area is given by S=nV. i found this by integrating over (n-1)-ball shells:
int_0^1 S r^(n-1) dr = V
S = V / int_0^1 r^(n-1) dr
S = V / (1^n / n)
S = nV
my next goal is to find the volume of an n-ball, but i'd like to do this as independently as possible, with only very minor hints. however i've been stuck for a few days, so i'm resorting to asking here. what methods of attack should i try?
i've learned all of the content in ap calc ab/bc and understand the concept behind (but am bad at) trig substitution
for a unit circle found its volume both by integrating over triangle slices and integrating over circular shells. for a unit sphere i found its volume by revolving the function sqrt(1 - x^2) over the z-axis (integrating over circles about the z-axis.) for the surface area of a unit sphere i divided the sphere into circular shells and integrated over their angle from the origin
@versed terrace Has your question been resolved?
$S = nV$ is not necessarily true - for a 2-ball (the sphere in 3 dimensions), $S = 4\pi r^2$ and $V = \frac 43 \pi r^3$, but $2V = \frac 83 \pi r^3 \neq 4 \pi r^2$. however, you are close: think about the specific case of the 2-sphere and try to find an operator that takes you from the volume to the surface area
haseeb ♥
2 ideas come to mind on how to proceed with your problem. option 1 is to find a function of (n-1) variables that you can revolve to get the volume of an n-sphere. option 2 is to look into spherical co-ordinates in n-variables: if you know spherical coordinates in 2 and 3 dimensions, try to generalize to n dimensions, then integrate the parametrized n-sphere. both of these approaches require multivariate integration, which im not sure you're familiar with
then, use the "operation" from before to obtain the surface area of the n-ball
note, it is not a clean answer, but there is a closed form for said volume
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.reopen
thank you! i should have mentioned that this is specifically for a unit n-ball, and that i incorrectly assumed that the n in an n-ball referred to its dimensions
i assumed a sphere was a 3-ball, for example. (i'm trying not to look too much into this to not get spoiled lol)
so for a unit sphere, to obtain the surface area you'd multiply by 3
similarly for a unit circle you can multiply by 2. i believe the integration i did proves this for all dimensions
^
made the same mistake when i started studying integration 🙃
i also didnt realize you were talking about unit n-balls, so that does work.
but if you're curious, there is an operation for n-balls of any size that translates between surface area and volume, and it ties in really nicely to some fundamental theorems in vector calculus. but i won't spoil
ooh interesting; i will look into this!
okay so we have an n-ball of radius r (in dimension n+1) with volume V and surface area S. we have that the unit n-ball has a volume U and surface area Z. we know that Z=(n+1)U
V = U * r^(n+1), meaning U = V / r^(n+1)
and
S = Z * r^(n)
therefore S = (n+1) U * r^(n) = (n+1) (V / r^(n+1)) * r^(n) = (n+1) (V / r)
does that look right?
@versed terrace Has your question been resolved?
you seemed to have substituted U = (n+1)*Z, when in fact we have Z = (n+1)*U. so the (n+1) should be in the denom
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Consider $(x_1,x_2)$. Let the same be generated by $p(x)$. Then there exists a polynomial $q(x)$ such that $p(x)q(x)=x_1$. Then WLOG the degree of $P$ is atmost $1$ and is a multiple of $x_1$. But then $x_2$ cannot be generated by the same. We thus have a contradiction.
Wai
I think all of this is fine but could be made a bit more rigorous
Like you should handle zero divisors for example
mhm
how do you mean
*mean
A principal idea domain must by definition be an integral domain
So lile
You must establish that either R has zero divisord
Or R is an integral domajn
Closed by @desert pasture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
oh
wait
there
instead of using negation laws at the end for P(x) its indempotent
the third to last step all have disjunctions between
i used commutative
to move them
for the second last step, i then used associative
then for P(x) i used idempotent, and for Q(x) negation
hmm ok
well Q(x) v ~Q(x) = t (tautology)
its not equal to Q(x) like u wrote in last line
negation law
Ax, (P(x) v t)
why did we not do anything with P(x) V T?
Closed by @twin prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
halo
ummmmmmmmmmm
Helo
i wan to proof that 851^3n +851^2n +851^n +2 divisible by 7
hiiiiii hru
I am good
thank god
Try to factorise out 7?
heard about ?modular arithmetic
yes
how
apply mod 7 and just use properties of modulo
Wait forget what i said
Before this, I studied the remainders of 2^n/7
it looks to long
wait
no
so
after this
infact it might be kinda wronf
it should be
4^3n + 4^2n + 4^n + 2
simplify after this
yes u can simplify it
2^n +4^n +3
write it as 2^n + 2^2n + 3
take three cases for n in mod 3
n is either 0 , 1 or 2 mod 3
and then use Fermat's Little theorem
i dont get this
after u get this
take 3 cases
since every number can be written either as
3k
3k+1
3k+2
why 3
You mean after compensation
compensation of what
no no
wat
wait we did something wrong
i dont get it
i solve it
how
oh no i solve another one
get back
What do you think about studying the remainders of 4^n and 2^n?
sure
,rccw
this is not divisible by 7 for n= 0,3,6....
how did u get this
factored out
from 4^n
wrote
4^n as 2^2n
oh
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
cycel length in those 2 is 3
could you provide the original question please
.
@worldly lanternit is normal to mention the helpers
?
sure you can for now
but in this case
we cant prove the question since its false
<@&286206848099549185> 🙏
All good ❤️
i mean
i solved it myself first but
mb
u can help us also
Was going to but hard to get that removed 😅
(if you did use it to answer helpee questions, we can remove you from the server, just so you're aware
)
lmao i dont use AI
i was just checking if the question is even valid or not
turns out it isnt valid
ill keep that in mind tho
and i apologize
find reminder pf 851 when by 7
He was asking questions, but he wasn't answering me.
Isn’t this a sequence question
dk
I'm not saying that's the case, I'm just giving a general "letting y'all know" 
ok thank u
You don't go and use 3k directly
The general method is to investigate powers of 2 modulo 7 and then notice that they do have a period
851^3n +851^2n+3n of 851 forms a sequence
Give a counter example
can anyone do this
Give counter examples bro
lmao what
take n=anything and it will never be 0 mod 7
sry
literally anything
No what
Ah yes n=1
n=1 is a counter example
Ping?
every n belonging to natural numbers is a counterexample
I think the question requires extracting patterns for n
,rccw
😭
patterns = sequence
This is another statement
Anyways he can follow the method of finding a period to prove that the expression modulo 7 is never 0 by exhaustion
Or he
No your good haha
im abit confused with what others have to say tho
Nta dziri mateleme?
hih 😔
anyone have smth to say?
why do yall love patterns and sequences
Patterns are the same as sequence
lmao
i dont
Because this is the general method
Tricks come with practice
no they arent 😇
son
modular arithmetic is the "method"
im crinne
patterns are not the same as sequence
forget what I said
Sorry
sequence is any array of number
pattern has a "pattern"
yep just realised I made a mistake here
ur good
you cant learn integration by estimating area with rectangles
although the rectangle method is "general"
using integration is better
similarly
patterns are helpful for basic questions
are you sure the question that you asked says
prove that this is divisible by 7
or does it say
prove that this is never divisible by 7
remainders
I am sure he gave you another thing
Can you send the whole exercise you found this?
He said deduce 🗿
Wait why not use that 851 congruence 4 modulo 7?
ya5o jbthm mlkitab
yeah
it can be done easily by modulo
?
we were doing that earlier
it did not work out?
is this a language
Yes he said he found it in a textbook
woah
Translation
Find the remainders of 4^n over 7
Deduce the reminders of (the expression) according to the values of n
So yes this is very easy
Rwa7 prv hna ytelfouhalek
okayyy
you solved it yet ?
@daring orchid Has your question been resolved?
Yes it been solved
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This one
@peak estuary
the characteristic eqn of AB is given as in the pic
we have to find characteristic eqn of AB
i mean
BA
mb
I see
robin.dabanc_
Where lambda_i are the eigenvalues
Since determinants and traces are equal trivially, you just have to show that “X”’s are the same in your picture
is there a way to do it without eignenvalues
@vapid cypress Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
This is the cleanest way
You need very very basic understanding
@vapid cypress do you know what eigenvalues are
just that Av = lamba(v)
thats abt it
Yeah that’s enough pretty much
and |A-lambda* I | = 0 is characteristic eqn
Yup
In fact, the characteristic is written as a polynomial in lambda. Then by Cayley Hamilton theorem it’s shown that a matrix satisfies its own characteristic equation
That’s why you’re allowed to replace lambda by your matrix (AB in this case) in the polynomial
From here try comparing coefficients of the two polynomials using Vieta’s (the roots of the poly in lambda are called eigenvalues); and the trace, determinant and “X” will pop out
is the characteristic eqn interms of lambda just replacing A with lambda in whatever i sent?
oh k
Yea
how exactly do u prove it?
It’s a non elementary proof
actually??
You can look up cayley Hamilton
In the sense it’s not under pre uni
This
Can you write tr(AB) in terms of the roots of the polynomial in lambda
wait the order of the matrix changes when u go from ab to bba
so determinant ba is not equal to determinant ab
first of all
ahh sht
its there a bit above
Mb
A is 3X2, B is 2X3
Do you know about ranks?
no
@vapid cypress Has your question been resolved?
ok thanks
<@&286206848099549185>
how do i remove helper role
@vapid cypress Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
can u repost the question
.close
Closed by @vapid cypress
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
for future, check pinned messages
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there a way to solve this using complex analysis, and if not, why not?
Standard residue theorem probably
The answer is pi * e * erfc(1)
and the only solution I found online is using feynmans technique of differentiating under the integral sign. But I wanted to know if it's possible using residue theorem
I can't land on pi * e * erfc(1) using complex analysis personally
What contours did you try
What would you do first? I have no clue anymore :(
just a circle contour around the poles at i and -i? That would be my first instinct
that would give 2pi i (e/2i - e/2i) which is 0
but heres the thing, only having z = i as the pole would give pi * e
which looks alot like pi * e * erfc(1)
And my question is pretty much, why doesn't this approach work and, if it's possible, how would it work.
<@&286206848099549185>
partial fractions and cauchy's integral formula probably
and then probably something stupid with ML
Partial fractions doesn't work for non-polynomials
x^2 + 1 = (x+i)(x-i)
How would you continue?
Me too, that's why I asked here :D
<@&286206848099549185>
Only way I can think to solve is is using the complimentary error function. Have you learnt what that is yet?
Not used really, just the definition. But I wanted to know if the integral is possible using complex analysis/ contour integration
It should be possible
and if it's not possible, why not? I know there are a lot of ways of solving this.
then what would be your course of action
I’d use Feynman’s Trick, and differentiate under the integral sign
.
For this particular integral, you technically could. But you wouldn’t be able to do it using a regular semicircular contour
The fact that e^-z^2 will end up growing like e^y^2 in the upper and lower half planes. Because of this, the arc integral does not vanish
So the idea of using the residue theorem is valid. You’d just have to rewrite e^-x^2 as a Fourier Transform
why would e^y^2 growing mean that the arc integral doesn't vanish exactly?
Im sorry but it's a bit a -> b therefore c -> d for me

That’s ok bro, let’s take it a bit at a time. Do you agree that in order for the semi circle method to work, the integral over CR must go to 0 as R goes to ♾️?
Yes
So, for our (e^-z^2)/(z^2 + 1), at the very top of the arc, where z = iR, we’d have z^2 = -R^2. You following up to this point?
So, yeah. It’s not that the integral is undefined. It’s just that it’s just that the limit not 0
More over, it’s grows without bound
And since the semicircle method requires the arc length component to essentially disappear (go to 0), that method wouldn’t work on this particular integral
It’s not a condition of the Cauchy Residue Theorem. It’s a condition for the semicircular contour method to work. We work around it by USING the Cauchy Residue Theorem.
I'll look into it more, thank you so much for your help!
I’m glad you’re curious enough to keep looking more into stuff. Have a good one man, and no worries 😊
This is why first year Uni math is boring to me 😭
Hahahahahaha
Because there is way cooler maths out there
Closed by @muted sapphire
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@muted sapphire still need help ?
We can use 2 known Fourier transform + Parseval
And thats all
Do you know fourier transform?
Ok in this case we can use 2 FT that are known
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The idea is that $I=\int_{\mathbb R}\frac{e^{-x^2}}{x^2+1}dx$ is the integral of the product of two functions whose Fourier transform we know well
alee
Let's take the convention $\widehat f(\xi)=\int_{\mathbb R} f(x)e^{-ix\xi}dx$
alee
And $f(x) = \frac1{2\pi}\int_{\mathbb R}\widehat f(\xi)e^{ix\xi}d\xi$
alee
And the known formulas are:$\widehat{\frac1{1+x^2}}(\xi)=\pi e^{-|\xi|}$ and $\quad \widehat{e^{-x^2}}(\xi)=\sqrt{\pi}e^{-\xi^2/4}$
alee
using Parseval in the form $\int_{\mathbb R} f(x)g(x)dx = \frac1{2\pi}\int_{\mathbb R}\widehat f(\xi)\widehat g(-\xi)d\xi$
alee
Yes
You get $I = \frac1{2\pi}\int_{\mathbb R}
\bigl(\sqrt{\pi}e^{-\xi^2/4}\bigr)\bigl(\pi e^{-|\xi|}\bigr)d\xi$
alee
alee
Can you proceed ?
If you want i can finish
I think I got it from here :)
Yes 👍
👍
incredible
Let me know if you still need help
I will thanks!
@tender meteor Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tender meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
university calculus I, related rates. How do i even find an equation to relate the variables?
i always start these by drawing a picture
idk about you, but when i learned this stuff, i couldn't create an equation with my mind, so a picture always helped me
@lavish skiff Has your question been resolved?
This calculus video tutorial explains how to solve the ladder problem in related rates. It explains how to find the rate at which the top of the ladder is sliding down the building and how to find the rate at which the area formed by the ladder is changing. In addition, it explains how to determine the rate at which the angle formed by the gro...
@lavish skiff Has your question been resolved?
ty riemann 🙏
i didnt know this was an actual form of a problem
.close
Closed by @lavish skiff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone verify wether this is correct
wrong labels for axis , but other than that
@worthy shoal Has your question been resolved?
other than that?
pretty sure the you should have two disjoint regions anyway so
@worthy shoal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wat
whenever i do it I get either cos inverse -2 or sin inverse 2 which are both not real
What’s the expression for the derivative you got?
-4 + 2 sin theta
thats.......wrong?
That’s wrong
what is it?
ok, do it step-by-step.
it can be this or -4 -2 cos theta
differentiate term by term
so $y = 6 - 4 \sin \theta -\cos^2 \theta$. What's the derivative of the first term,i.e. 6? It's 0. What about the second term, i.e. $-4\sin\theta$?
Annie Maqionde
it would be -4 right?
Annie Maqionde
aa i was thinking u have to treat sin and cos as x
is derivative of cos theta sin theta
the $x-axis$ is clearly given in terms of $\theta$, and as a rule, for such kind of questions, its differentation w.r.t. the variable of the x-axis, i.e. $\theta$
Annie Maqionde
Annie Maqionde
What is the derivative of $\cos^2\theta$(hint chain rule)
Annie Maqionde
hint for the hint: chain rule = $\frac{dz}{dx} = \frac{dz}{dy}\cdot \frac{dy}{dx}$
Annie Maqionde
ok i was googling the chain rule just now
cos theta (-sin theta)?
u only differentiate one of them
$2\cos\theta \cdot (-\sin \theta)$
Annie Maqionde
@vale onyx Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find integers x, y, z such that
56x + 98y + 140z = gcd(56, 98, 140)
I don't know where to begin.
use the identity that gcd(a, b, c) = gcd(gcd(a,b), c)
this is an extended bezout identity
Oh I did not know that existed, thanks.
npnp
Fuck
Wait how do I solve for the integers x y and z? I can inspect that it is obviously 2x56 - 1x98 = 14 but this isn't all solutions?
Treat it as diophantine equations
think ab - ba - 0c = 0
you can add n amounts of 0 and it does not change the original equation
you might have to solve for bc - cb and ca - ac too but i think this can work
So 3 cases? (i think should work)
.close
Closed by @granite iris
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can somebody help me with 40 I have no idea how to do it
Can you write down what a half time life means?
Half life?
Yes
I mean how long smth break downs I don’t really know tbh
It's how long it takes for half of that thing to decay
Like if I told you some substace starts with a given quantity A and has a half life of 2 years, would you be able to write down an equation for how much is left after a given time passed?
Would I put it equal to half the thing? But what number would I use the 10 or the long decimal?
Let's just start with a half life of one year.
After one year how much is left if you started with a quantity A with half life 1 year?
.987?
Half life of 1 year mean every year half of what you have is gone.
Yea I put it in the calculator
Cus u divide by 1 by both sides with equals the same thing then out it in I thought
What I mean is if you start with some number A and I tell you every year we divide what you have by 2, what's left after 1 year?
If you have 100$ and every year you burn half of it, after the first year how much do you have left?
I’m really bad at word problems
If you lose half of 100$ how much do you have left?
50
Ok, so after 1 year, you are left with 50$.
And then after the second, year, you'll have 25$
Then 12.50$ after the third year
And so on
In other words we could say that the amount of money you'll have left after $t$ years is $100 \left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^t$ right?
Azyrashacorki
This is what a half life of 1 represents : every year, half of what you have decays
If you had a half life of 300 years, then every 300 years, half of what you have decays
This is what a half life represents. So you have your initial equation $20e^{-0.0001216t}$ and you want to write it in the form $20\left( \frac{1}{2}\right)^{\frac{t}{h}}$ where $h$ will be your half life.
