#help-23
1 messages · Page 393 of 1
if instead of siny = x it was y = sinx what would dy/dx be
but idk the specifics
dy/dx = cos x
no literally if x = siny what is dx/dy
dx/dy = cosy
ok now how can you rearrange that equation to get dy/dx
idk tbh
reciprocal is just flip right
so you like flip dx/dy to be dy/dx
and then cosy/1 = 1/cosy
and then boom 1/cos x? am i missing anything?
why you turn y into x
its a little bit confusing but essentially dy and dx can be treated as individual variables in most cases
what dy/dx = 1/cosy means is that the rate that sin^-1 x is changing at any point is cos of the reciprocal of the current value of sin^-1 x
if that makes sense
well i understand that the derivative is the instantaneous roc
how does it allow y to turn into x tho
when u take the reciprocal
whaaa
He started with an example with flipped y and x to demonstrate that there is nothing special about the variables
we are back to your original question
dy/dx doesnt have to be in terms of x
yeah i get that
what are you asking
oh
bro i was AI hallucinating
i see now
i thought the steps lead to 1/cos x
but no its 1/cos y
ok thanks guys
.close
Closed by @lavish skiff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont get it
Well you have a statement P -> Q
If the proof starts with "assume P" then it's direct
If it starts with "assume not Q" then it's a contrapositive (going for not Q -> not P)
okay
If it starts with "assume not (P -> Q)" then it's by contradiction
Closed by @verbal pecan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i saw ts problem in another server a while ago and i was able to compute the answer but it was allegedly just from someone's homework and my method could not have been expected of the student. i am still curious if there is a nice way to write the answer
we have 70 red beads, 70 blue beads, 70 green beads, and 70 yellow beads, and we make a circle out of them randomly (choose one of the 280 uniformly, then another out of the remaining 279, and so on, and connect the first and last). what is the probability there are no two beads of the same color next to each other?
ts is so tuff
,calc 35160752767483967793856895649187208658376924104964949185034223823701112860537559776144881711744175020305185933564751125817871/1193901580824623492029582902841551340430563387679240327772058617014835289592291160051553067139282835765793966673575963676266928049345932726243971753166210600000
Result:
2.9450294171818e-35
uhm
that is hard
this is the answer i got. which i am pretty confident in. but there was a lot of computation involved and my method cannot really be "written as a math expression"
@solar hazel Has your question been resolved?
Not that I'm in a position to check this (it's 2am over here), but an approach for a question like this, that I'd describe as canonical, would be to scale down the question considerably (say, 2 beads of each colour), then seeing if you can scale up an answer as you increase the number of beads; then the core of the answer would be to prove this scaling is valid
Then if it is valid you can just answer the 70-beads-per-colour case as a corollary
this is not really saying anything
wait so if the numbers of beads are significant enough that when you place a bead, then a 2nd bead next to it, the probability of the 2nd bead that differs from the 1st is like approx 3/4
sure
then i think since we have 280 beads (70*4)
then the probability of placing is (3/4)^280
no, that is not the answer
what is the answer?
it is a good heuristic approximation but it's not that simple
this is the answer
,calc (3/4)^(280)
Result:
1.0402883853216e-35
hmm this weird
if you can't see why it's different, try with 2 beads of each color
the probability become significantly smaller as i use higher amount of beads each color
how did you come up to your answer
did you DP? 
ok good that's all i can think of atm
it was still quite complicated and slow
must have been annoying to case in the last bead matching the first one lol
this reminds me of equitable graph coloring
chromatic symmetric function moment
@toxic stratus categorical graph theory
well ig a fun fact is if you had as many beads of each color as you wanted there are 3^280 + 3 ways to do it lol
in this case the (3/4)^n heuristic holds up extremely well, so it's curious it doesn't appear to work for the balanced case
,calc (3/4)^(278) * ((3/4) * (1/4) + (2/4) * (3/4))
Result:
1.0402883853216e-35
i think you can factor a 3/4 out of the right and you get back to (3/4)^280
i could definitely see an error of order 1/280 arising
whatever color i use first, i have less of, so i'm marginally less likely to end my chain with it
here are some example numbers btw. the tuple is the amount of each color. the next two numbers are the number of good circles and the total number of circles (i am counting rotations of circles as distinct, unlike is usually done for necklaces, but since it's a probability problem we can treat it either way). and the last two are the probability of a good circle, in fraction and decimal form
oh its an e thing isn't it
also my program accepts any length tuple if you would like to see any other color amounts
each pair of beads is marginally less likely than 1/4 to be a pair
69/279 ig
,calc (210/279)^280
Result:
2.832863239807e-35
oh also here are the numbers for 3 colors
they have an oeis page https://oeis.org/A110707
but the 4 color version does not
or is it a pi thing
wow
that's for 3 colors though
i am convinced that ts problem is very tuff and should not have been put on that kid's homework
even the 3 color version is like... bruh
and 4 colors is so much harder
@solar hazel Has your question been resolved?
i'm not sure ms bot
kinda
i declare my question resolved because i have convinced myself the problem is tuff
Closed by @solar hazel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to find the value of {0|1|2}
i have no clue what to do
I'm not opening a pdf. can you write it here, or screenshot it?
i can, but its quite big
was js about to say that
ill just screen shot what should be nesessary
not trusting any download links on discord lol
pdfs are horrendous for hidden stuff XD
compleatly fair
alr had a feeling this was too advanced for me by the active role lol
is this game theory or something
combinatorial game theory
i can explain more if anyone is willing to help me
I think it comes out to (1) + (~2) + (-3)
I'm not sure I understand the notation 
that looks plausable
it doesnt, o({0|1|2})=(L,L,L,L,L,L) while o(1~2-3)=(R,R,R,R,R,R)
btw, n~n-n=0 always
so you can remvoe 1 from all three of those to get ~1-2
{0||} = 1 from the definition of the unit
{|1|} = 1~1 from theorem 2.1
{||2} = 2-1 from theorem 2.1
not quite
{~1|1|}=1~1
therom 2.1 says for any subtle integer, 1 is not a subtle integer
same goes for the second
~1~1 then?
wdym?
~1 is the subtle int unit right?
you said {|1|} which is diferent
also $G\ne G^L+G^M+G^R$ so this doesnt track
pinkishnova cgt queen
$G := {G^L|G^M|G^R}$
@shut hound
Ye, I got that
Side note, was this made to be confusing?
There are so many overloaded symbols
in what
also it sometimes just does this
for example: games with activness
Ok can we at least agree that it's {0||} + {|1|} + {||2}?
but its not tho
It's not?
no
this
I thought you meant that like it's not 0 + 1 + 2
also because like, i can tell just at a glance that the outcome classes dont work out
i mean it isnt
but its also $G\ne {G^L||}+{|G^M|}+{||G^R}$
pinkishnova cgt queen
think about 1/2
Hm... fair
Hold on, Imma try to unfold this on paper, I don't think anything I can do in the textbox is helping
i know its a bit weird
alright
good luck!
alright
@scenic phoenix Has your question been resolved?
lol
How does $G + \neg G = 0$ work, how do you remove elements by performing disjoint addition?
@shut hound
You aren’t removing elements and what is disjoint addition?
Like it’s just notational shorthand for the additive inverse
No I got that, but, $1 + \neg 1 = 0$, correct?
@shut hound
Yes
$1 + \sim 1 + -1 = 0$
@shut hound
Yes that’s true
@shut hound
Yep
$1 = {0||}, \sim 1 = {|0|}, -1 = {||0}$
Yep
@shut hound
$1 + \sim 1 -1 = { \sim 1 - 1 | 1 - 1 | 1 + \sim 1}$ though
@shut hound
@scenic phoenix did I make a mistake?
Yes
Where?
There are multiple ways to notate the same number
No I mean that’s all correct
Oh ok
No you did not
@scenic phoenix Has your question been resolved?
I'm sorry, I don't think I'll be able to hand compute this
Do you have the permission to use scripts?
@scenic phoenix ?
Sure
Also sorry, I’m just a bit busy at the moment
In that case I'd just write a BFS
np
I actually also need to leave
which is why I sort of gave up on hand solving this
for the BFS you'll wanna try adding the units to the states and maintaining and unifying the states as you go I suppose
yeah
@scenic phoenix Has your question been resolved?
@scenic phoenix Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I solve that integral?
if i substitute a value for t, do i have anymore variables?
I don't understand
also remeber what log_e e^x means
i have log_e t, where t is a variable but if i sub a particular value for t
like 3 i have a constant now which
Consider $f(e^\frac{\pi}{2}) = \int \left(\frac{1-\sin(\ln e^\frac{\pi}{2})}{1-\cos(\ln e^\frac{\pi}{2})}\right)$
Flatus
no
use this type of idea
nope
nahh i don't get it
it's the integral of 0
yea
which is..?
0
u sure
this feels wrong
am I wrong?
hm?
Flatus
C
Flatus
yeaa
that integral is not C
yeah nvm u gotta solve the integral lmao
Prathmesh
bruh
<@&286206848099549185>
nahh okay I can solve it
.close
Closed by @sour wigeon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yeah soz i kinda trolled
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain 10b please
find real numbers (i think they'll be integers) a, b, and c such that that equation is an identity
such that $n^2 = a(n+1)(n+2) + b(n+1) + c$ for all $n$
schrödinger's kitten
thats what you have to figure out
try writing the LHS as a general quadratic and expand the RHS
can you show me how to do it if u don't mind
wait
i can help you think of what to do but i wont do it for you
one second
yeah sure
i just realised one thing if i do that then im gonna get a=a b=b
it won't work
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
wait let me draw out what ur trying to make do
one second
wait no nvm i think i just answered my own problem
so sorry but i think iget it
alr
i just realised i was over complicating this so badly
Closed by @half comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ye
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The answer here is incorrect, i mean the question is incorrect aswell in that case no? the final universal y should be existential y?
My solution, confirm if im not going insane, cuz chatgpt gemini, claude all said the other solution is correct
in what sense
how can it just be mine its the same thing
they both look the exact same
bottom right is where it confuses me
how did they grab the negation from R(x,y) and not from negation from Q
Oh damn I got confused by your parentheses
if they want it to be on the outside
Disregard what I said
if you really wanted an universal it woukd be something like negation of universal y (R(x,y) ^ Q(x)) no?
Good handwriting
The answer here is incorrect
Why do you think so?
Ok so you think it's incorrect
yes
Nel
"not for all x is P(x) true" is equivalent to "there exists an x such that P(x) is false"
As in "not all x yield P(x)" and "there is a counterexample to P(x)"
In your case x is y and P(x) is R(x,y)
I think it's this part that confuses you
∃y¬R(x,y)∨¬Q(x) is this or that
¬∀yR(x,y)∨¬Q(x) or ∃y¬(R(x,y)∧Q(x)) which is then ¬∀y(R(x,y)∧Q(x))
ye i said, the negation can be taken out only from the first R(x,y) and not the second?
No, the problem is that you moved the "exists y" outside the parentheses
,, \forall x (\textcolor{orange}{(\exists y \neg R(x,y))} \lor \textcolor{green}{(\neg Q(x))})
Nel
The "exists y" does not apply to anything other than the "not R(x,y)"
Love how they used the double negation law just to undo it 4 steps later
Well yeah LLMs will tend to say whatever they think will please you
btw you get taught this in undergrad math?
yes
well it obviously depends on where you live
oh interesting
Idk, I think it may depend on the country
we do this in Australia
because i think it isnt taught here for undergrad math usually its other discrete chapters
im doing CS so we take different version of Discrete
it's one of 3 subtopics of 5 major topics in the hardest math course in australia
it's more popular in uni tho
Well even within a country I'm pretty sure you could have different kinds of undergraduate education
Some topics are more general but first-order logic tends to be specialized
needs brackets, doesn't it?
Why?
That's the same thing?
wdym
negations are distributive
$(\neg \forall x) P(x) \equiv \exists x P(x)$, right?
Flatus
No
"it's not true for all x, that P(x)"
"it's not true that, for all x P(x)"
That's the same sentence
you dont need to take out the negations in the first place dough nah?
wait so $\neg (\forall x P(x)) \equiv (\neg \forall x)P(x)$
Flatus
that feels wrong to look at
Well you don't usually write $(\neg \forall x)P(x)$
Nel
It looks like a grammatical error
Like $(\neg \forall x)$ doesn't mean anything by itself
Nel
i get it
Don't quote me on that though, I'm not an expert logician
algs algs
(maybe ask in https://discord.com/channels/268882317391429632/496785905474994186 to be sure)
@long yoke Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @long yoke
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Any clue?
Montrer que =prove that
On pose= we let
Determiner le rest de la division Euclidian de N par 27= find the rest of the division of N by 27
,rccw
do you find remainders of large numbers using binomial theorem in general?
what...?
ok uh how were you taught to calculate remainders in general
congruence
try using the result you got from question 1
$10^100 + 100^10 = 10^99 \cdot 10 + 100^9 \cdot 100$
$10^{100} + 100^{10} = 10^{99} \cdot 10 + 100^9 \cdot 100$
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
i actually didnt even do one
prove that $\forall n$ that $10^{3n} \equiv 1 \mod 27$
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
that's the first question tho
but 27 is so freakishly large
that i dont know how to compute it
sorry
what's 1000 mod 27 btw?
1
its 1 but how will you prove it?
there's your answer
you need to prove it form scratch or can you use properties
if $a \equiv b \mod m$ then $a^n \equiv b^n \mod m$
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
boom
maybe they need to prove this too lol
WE START FROM 10 CONGRU -17[27]
we square them both
but 17² is where im stumped
not allowed twin
is this a joke 🥀
no im serious
that's 289
some olympiad questions does NOT allow you to use a calculator
i only remember 17^2
🥀
@tiny geyser27 = 3*9
or you can prove this
if $a \equiv 1 \mod 3$ then $a^3 \equiv 1 \mod 27$
you should manage to get a 999 i believe
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
because i did notice that there's $10^3$ and $27$ is $3^3$
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
yeah this is way easier
the way we can prove this is kinda simple
let $a = 3k + 1$ for some $k \in \mathbb Z$
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
and cube that thing
so try to cube this
thanks guys
think i got it
thanks @open wedge @weary whale @onyx valley @winged flare
.close
Closed by @tiny geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np, i appreciate it
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
x^2+y^2+z^2&=-2026\ x^3+y^3+z^3&=123456789\ x^5+y^5+z^5&=987654321\ \sqrt{x^2+y^2}+\sqrt{y^2+z^2}+\sqrt{z^2+x^2}
Need $ around your tex
$x^2+y^2+z^2&=-2026\ x^3+y^3+z^3&=123456789\ x^5+y^5+z^5&=987654321\ \sqrt{x^2+y^2}+\sqrt{y^2+z^2}+\sqrt{z^2+x^2}$
Mr. BananaHead
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
No real solution for x,y,z atleast because in 1st eqn it is given sum of 3 >=0 numbers is negative
complex?
whats even the question
ya man idk how to solve for complex solutions somebody else help
find the value of the expression given at bottom i guess
@brisk pine come
@brisk pine Has your question been resolved?
no
if you dont want help then dont create a channel for it, this server isnt for giving answers.
i want direct answer
thats not going to happen here good luck with that
Closed by @brisk pine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys]]
part b
so
i know the formula
so
we can say
CD=5
i got this for line L
idk what to do after
find 2 more sides in vector notation, AC and BC, and then just apply the formula for volume of tetrahedron?
how wld u do it
wld u have variables in AC and BC
@fervent pulsar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey how could i figure out for which values of λ the lines are perpendicular?
what is the rule for perpendicular lines
m1 * m2 = -1?
maybe my math is just wrong im gettingλ=0 or λ=1 which is apparantly wrong
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
i got m1 = -λ/(λ-1) and m2 is -(3λ+1)/-2λ but ill snap a picture of my work real quick
that should be right
damn knew it was gonna be some bs 🙏 thanks for the help
cancelling negative signs here in m2 will help with that
its annoying when you get a perfect whole number answer like 1 and then its wrong lol
Closed by @coarse yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could somebody tell me if I got these true or false questions right
,rotate
All are correct acc to me
@soft lava Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
okay uh which grade?
scalar product?
y12
do u use scalar product maybe
yeah i figured
no
yea i think it is scalar product
the teacher just sucks at teaching vectors he only taught us the i and j notation thing
you can do it without dot product I think?
oh thats alrt so u gotta scalar product th two vectors PQ and QR
yajant
if it comes out to be 0 then you can say that Angle between 2 is 90
say
similar names
oh not the first time
what does scalar product mean
like how do u do it
is it like factorising it or something?
this is what i did
basically for any two vectors, scalar product/dot product is simply the multiplacation of respective i, j, k coefficents and then adding them all
adding all of them together? like the i values + j values
hold on
ok
For vectors $\vec u= (u_1,u_2)$ and $\vec v = (v_1,v_2)$, the dot product is given by $u \cdot v= u_1 v_1 +u_ 2 v_2$ in 2D$
MxRgD
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
that's the dot product
yeah but how did u get -18
-6x3
no its -6 x 9
corresponding coefficients of same axis
yup
ah i see
and then add the 2 which gives 0
need help with C too?
so is that all you have to show?
yeah
im kinda confused, how does that show that pqr is 90 degrees
any two vectors having scalar/dot product 0 have to be perpendicular
oh ok
another thing, how did u know which vectors were perpendicular
not ssure how to tell
reason for this being that their is a term of cos($theta)
that was asked in the question!
see Q is the pivotal point here, and 2 vectors emerging from Q have angle 90 between them so i think its pretty obvious afterthis right?
yeah just make the angle Q 90
.
my teacher is so bad, he only taught us the i and j stuff and magnitude
sure
oh thats alright happens
could u like walk me through the question
first try on your own
this is more of a diagramatic question
approaching it using diagram would be easier as one of the angles (as prev proved) is 90
wait ill send a pic
ok
wait i am actually not very fluent in using texit sorry
i could send a picture of my working if thats fine?
yea sure
not sure if its right
oh hey thats right good job
oh nice thanks
but idk where to put s
because i dont know how to draw vectors
do they work like coordinates or soemthing
oh do you know how to use cartesian system?
yes thats right,
just put i direction as x
one sec let me put it in some graphic calc
and j direction as y
is it possible to do this without a graphing calc
yeah
diagram is only so that you understand the shape of the quardilateral better thats all
would u just draw it like plotting coordinates on a smaller cartesian plane?
even a rough sketch is fine
not even to scale i would just draw rough figure just so i know what position the points are in
yup
wow this is a TON for 4 marks
yeah it sure is
but then again i am not really familiar with your solving methods and teacher style so i wont suggest my shortcuts/formulae but just know there are easier methods too
@worldly briar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"A 48-year-old person decides to improve their pension security. Starting on their 49th birthday, they intend to deposit €6,000 into an account that earns an annual return of 7.5%. They continue making these identical deposits every year until they turn 65. How much can the person withdraw from the account annually for ten years after retiring? Assume the account is completely emptied during this ten-year period."
I'm having trouble with the second part of this question specifically concerning how you get the exact amount you can take each year when after each withdrawal the remaining principal grows at the 7,5% rate. I know the way to calculate it is **beginning balance *** (i (1 + i) ^years) / ((i + 1)^years -1) but I don't understand how to get there from the given information or how each part relates to the question.
i only see one part of the question?
@true venture You'll have two parts to this problem, the first is getting the future value of the money given an annualized investment, this is generally called the A/F formula, which is what you gave. This is the easy part. Next you need to figure out the second part, which is another, slightly different application of A/F
The second part is tricky because you are using the formula in a bit of a non-standard way
Actually, I think that might be the A/P formula
What I mean by 2 parts is the first part you figure out how much you have after 17years of investing 6000 per year. the second part is how much can you take out each year for 10 years when the amount has to be the same each withdrawal.
For the second part, you have to solve for it using a negative deposit, (but the interest rate stays the same)
I guess what I'm having a hard time with is grasping how the equation takes into account the fact that you withdraw the same amount each time and the rest keeps gaining interest maybe I'll ask my prof next class or just hope I don't have to understand it fully just recognize the problem and remember the formula :D
I'll look into A/F and A/P maybe that'll give some insight
.close
Closed by @true venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Number 8, idk what to do with the ^3
I don't see an 8
its the first thing with the f'(5)
idk what it's called in arabic but you would use the chain rule here
if $f(x) = (\psq)^3$ then $f'(x) = 3(\psq)^2 \cdot (\psq)'$
schrödinger's kitten
Ya I’m half asleep ignnoreee
now start evaluating, so log(5-1) becomes log(4)
yea but work from the inside out
so next would be like
$3(\blue{\log_2(2^2)})^2 \cdot \f1{\ln2\cdot4}$
schrödinger's kitten
focus on the blue thing, that can be simplified
4…?
hmm yes but $\log_24$ can be simplified
schrödinger's kitten
no, just 2
Whats
schrödinger's kitten
let me stare at it gimme a moment
Oh then we removed the 2 and 2
there are several 2's :)
ummm well the next thing we do is notice that $\log_22 = 1$
schrödinger's kitten
so then we get $\purple2\cdot1 = \purple2$
schrödinger's kitten
so we simplify $\log_22^2 \to 2$
schrödinger's kitten
I’m sorry gimme a moment my heads in a wall rn 😭
rule 6
oh yeah thats a more straightforward way lol
كانت بتكلمك علي log_2(2^2)
من خواص اللوغاريتمات (logs) انك ينفع تنزلي اي اس (exponent) جوا الlog ل بره الlog
يعني, log(a^b)=b*log(a)
ينفع تستخدمي نفس الخاصيه مع log_2(2^2) ب انك تنزلي ال exponent بره الlog
log_2(2^2) =2 log_2(2)
و بردو من خواص اللوغاريتمات ان log_a(a)=1
2 log_2(2) = 2 x 1 = 2
thats what hayla said.
couldnt have said it better myself
@deft furnace Has your question been resolved?
😭
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am a bit confused on the way an exponent effects whether or not equations qualify as functions or not. i am not understanding why/whether an exponent on top of the x in y=mx+b means that the value for x has to be positive
what must a function satisfy?
a function has to have exactly one y value to each x value in the domain
wait just to be clear this is a function f : R -> R right
the relation has to satisfy that there is only one y value for each x value
oh my, i haven't learned what that means yet 😭 i'm on very basics of functions, im sorry
are x and y real numbers lol
yes, so far they've all been integers
ok, so we know there's one and only one y for each x
now consider x = -3
do we have such a y?
yes, that equals -243 if i multiply 3(-3^4)
i'm not saying y = -3
i'm saying x = -3
that would be -3/3 which is -1 and then moving the exponent i assume makes it -1^4.. im not familiar with moving exponents across the equal sign, does it change?
well, actually, you're partially correct
if x = -3 then y^4 = -1
but does such a y exist?
(sidenote: ||y = -1 doesn't work||)
on a graph, y can be -1. why is it that it doesn't work on paper?
if y = -1, then x = 3
lol
oh, so you're saying that if you plug it into the equation it comes out janky?
yeah
well uh
x = -3 has no solution
for any y you choose
(proof: ||trivial inequality on y^2||)
you’re correct
oh nvm
so it's not a function because it can't have negatives plugged in due to the exponent?
ye
also
x = 3 has multiple solutions—what are they?
1=y^4?
is that one of them? i still have no idea what to do with exponent but ill look up a youtube video on that HAHA
did you learn about difference of squares 
for it to be a solution you would have to have y = something
but you are correct in that y is a solution if and only if 1 = y⁴
if you showed it to me i'd probably recognize it, but i don't recognize it by name
$a^2-b^2=(a-b)(a+b)$
nadat12
ah! i havent utilized that in my class yet, my algebra education was severely lacking in highschool. so no, i'll look that up as something to learn as well!
i think that i should close this since i got the basic answer i needed and will be looking into the concept more. thank yall!
.close
Closed by @thorn junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Had an issue computing partial derivatives; didn't exactly know how to describe it, show I'll show you the images of my attempts alongside my worksheet- since my work felt so big, I have trouble finding errors. What am I missing?
(I noticed that the help forum is supposed to be precalc, I can close it if that's not what you want)
One good suggestion:
At $f_{xy}$, for your final step, don't factorise $z^9$ out.
Restarter
Leave it in the form: $e^{xyz^9}\left(xyz^{18}+z^9\right)$.
Restarter
Closed by @trail heron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800> underage
Closed by @junior smelt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i read that as ln(12)
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can somone help me make a gokart track in desmos
it needs 8 or 9 functions
and atleast 5 equations
• Parabola hyperbola, cubic, linear, quadratic, circle.
thi sis teachers exampelar
my teacher asked us to start on paper
before implementing in desmos
okay lets start
to make a gokart track, we need it to be continous at all points, aka a loop
sure send it over
Think about what functions and shape each part would be
okay have you divided it into parts?
Here
okay so the bottom most part left to the hyperbola is a parabolic path right?
huh
quick question are you allowed to use sinusoidal functions too?
is that like the wave
sine wave
i dont think so
the orange one?
i dont think so
yeah the orange is a sin wave
thank you
hello there
hello yajant
ok so
does this look good?
should we start working them out
and putting it in desmos?
yup
yes
wait what are the blu eones
prbola
alrr
okay so the first line looks like vertical right?
so for the first line, you need a line parallel to y
uh
30,40
to
30,70?
do i calculate the gradient
with those
yup
but if you calc gradient, its just infinite
so we need domain?
this is an excpetional case as such lines cant be put in y=mx+c format
its x = 0 right?
as along the y axis everywhere x=0
yes
similarily if i make a line which passes thru these poijts,
what would the equation be?
i dont get it
sorry
im running low on sleep
oh wait
i think i get what your saying
vertical lines cant be written as y=mx+c
cuz its just x
so cant we just do 30x
yes!
and have a domain
yes that right
ok ok
so you could just write it as x= 30 right?
yeah
as x would be 30 everywhere
yes
yup
but with curly brackets
shouldnt we move on to the hyperbole below or above the linear?
thats how my teacher did it
okay then lets do that
okay sure
y=a/(x+h)+k
sure this is bteer
ok
one sec
no worries
hey sorry abt that
its all g
so for hyperbolas equation, we need to know what a, k and h would shift the hyperbola
ok
on the book its a little tough
i would advise to use desmos only
so first of all we need to shift it up right?
yeah
see that increasing k shift the hyperbola upwards
so first increase the k to appropiate height
well?
put in desoms and see
nice
put limits for x too
now start working on the linear n once ur done with that ping me
@eager sable Has your question been resolved?
Interesting.
Oh must be hyperbola?
Because a circle would make that easier to be honest.
Why is there a broken segment over there?
good now go for the linear
his assignments says there must be some hyperbolas too
i think we can make 2 of the turns circles
Oh okay.
and hte bottom right a hyperbola
okay go for it then
ok

ToS and all 