#help-23
1 messages · Page 379 of 1
Hey, Im so confused by this but how do you partition this into Voronoi regions?
is it this thing?
cant u just draw lines inbetween every pair of dots which are "close"
and then draw the boundary from those lines
(drawn in black here)
(to be a bit more exact, draw bisectors between the pairs of points)
What i don't grt is thst it should be gor every near pair right
well, yeah, but i think it can be done intuitively
just draw them until they intersect with sth else
Wait what is the purpose of thr diagonal line
its the bisector between the diagonal pair
Oh yeah
i marked those points red here
Ok
So basically draw a bisector for every pair of adjacent points and call it a day, yes?
yeah, that's how I'd do it
including the diagonal adjacency
and then you have to pick which parts are actually the boundaries
Ok ty!!
.close
Closed by @opaque fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
where is your banner from
Closed by @wispy berry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Lmao
wow

💀
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I tried solving this with phasors but Im getting Pie as the answer
Yes but its measured from +ve x axis right?
If it was +180 it would also be moving away from the centre
Im sorry i didn't understand
So on your diagram the y axis is where the block is horizontally
And the x axis is the speed
why?
Okay so at 0 degrees the block is at the origin moving quickly to the right
yes
So what would it be like at -60 degrees
-90 is having the block on the left side with 0 speed btw
at the midpoint between amplitude and origin moving towards left
wait how
Wait I'm confused hold on
shouldnt it be at the origin moving towards left at -90
Actually I got it wrong the whole time :P
It should be in the top left
Your graph's x axis is the position and the y is the speed
No man it does not represent speed and position
if u graph speed and position in shm youll get a kind of cosine wave
okayyy
wait then you get an ellipse
v = w*sqrt(A^2 - x^2)
reagraning u get an ellipse
But you can rescale to get a circle with the phase as the angle along the circle
<@&268886789983436800>
(scam)
lmao
So in your diagram 0 degrees is like (1,0) where it is all the way to the right and 0 speed to the right
And 60 degrees is like $(0.5,\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2})$ where it's 0.5 to the right of the centre and with speed $\frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}$
yes correct
BBMaths
The speed is the y position (divided by A)
k
So what does 120 degrees look like on your graph
I'm a bit worried because I don't even see how it's 5/3pi
I get 4/3pi
wait i got it
Yeah that's where you want it
so the angle between the two is 60 degrees which is also 300 degrees=5pi/3 radians
.close
Closed by @latent mountain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have to prove this thingy. It says that it's enough to take n! out of the brackets on the left. I tried doing that and it was n!(1+[1/n] * n^2) which ended up being n!(1+n)
but that's not the same as (n+1)! I think? Did I make a mistake while taking it out of the brackets?
It is the same
Closed by @distant chasm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can we solve 4z²-10iz-7-i=0 in C
?
how so
whats that?
use coefficients 4, -10i, and -7-i as your a,b,c
Closed by @feral condor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello can someone help me out with this question, I don't understand it but our teacher said that we need to apply Pythagoras theorem somehow. Any help is appreciated.
Start out by drawing a diagram
like this ?
Yep, that's good
No we dont
Are you all doing this problem together😭
Maybe
You guys know the british flag theorem?
no
It's based on the pythagorean theorem
oh wait thats helpful ty
thank you
Thank you so much for this assistance, saviour.
Thank the lord

who is this
ありがとうございます
You probably shouldn't use something you haven't seen in class though
wtf is happening in this channel
Our teacher doesnt teach
Hes mute and didnt show up for a month
Three people trying to solve the same problem in class
yes
I assume
Closed by @plush fossil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, could anyone explain where the 2 comes from in the second expression? I think it has to do with the negative exponent but I just can't understand it somehow. Some other examples or maybe a break down would be great
oh ye
Where it says 2x^1/2 in the denominatoir
power rule of differentiation
x^-1=1/x
to the power of neg 1 flips it
btw why tf are you asking this while doing trigg?
Im just not the best at Algebra
is this derivative of (1/2)x^(-1/2)?
so its 1/2*1/x^1/2
i should have said that for context, mb
then your answer is correct its power rule x^(-a) can be written as 1/x^a
Yea it's right, I just want to know how to simplify it
Because the answer choices don't include the unsimplified version
you got 1/2sqrt(x) right.. what more simplification do you want?
just send the question so we know what you did wrong
maybe it's not a simplification problem
Xerxes
in your case n = 1/2 now try it
$\frac{1}{2}x^{frac{-1}{2}$
Moriarty
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

i get what youre trying to say
then there's your 2 in the denominator which is 1/2 from the power rule
what?
From the 1st to the 2nd expression in this photo
The coefficent of 1/2 goes to 2
1/2 does not equal 2
$\frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}}\ =\ \frac{1}{2\ }\cdot\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}$
Xerxes
the 2 is in the denominator its still 1/2
Ok I understand it now
Yeah I was just being dumb
I forgot it's in a fraction
This is exactly what I asked for, basically a breakdown of what it is so I can understand where things are coming from. Srry if it wasn't clear. Ty though!
.close
Closed by @raw sedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
squeeze\
$x[\frac{n}{x}] \in (x(\frac{n}{x}-1), x(\frac{n}{x}))$
very sorry for the badtex
sandwhich
ye i thought of squeeze but i got a bit confused..
x-1<=[x]<=x
does this hold if we put x-->n/x?
how ever one eway is to split the gif as fractional part + integer
Closed by @lone void
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What are the positive integer pairs (m,n) such that (3^n-2^(n-1))/(2^m-3^n) is an integer? So far what I found is that there are some that work for n=1 and n=2 but cannot seem to find ones for higher n
I also asked this question in #help-7|zen1thxyz for anyone interested
m = n - 1 always works I think
Other than that cause that’s trivial
@small epoch Has your question been resolved?
The only other possible cases are 2^m - 3^n = +- 1
Can you prove how?
Nevermind I found a counterexample
What’s the counterexample?
(4, 2)
Oh, other than that
This is with 1 =< n =< 500 and 1=< m =< 5000
And for n >= 3 the only solution is m = n-1
Obviously not a proof but strong evidence
Thanks, that’s still very helpful
I have another fraction I want to check when it is an integer. It’s (3^n+2^(n-2))/(2^m-3^n)
m max 50000 and n max 5000
@small epoch Has your question been resolved?
Another fraction too: (13 * 3^(n-2) - 2^(n+1))/(2^m-3^n)
That’s what I got too by checking small cases
@small epoch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @small epoch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can you give me a bidmas question
i need help with bidmas
✨ google ✨
ok
Closed by @quasi bison
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey, i need some help with the b question, saying:
show that |arctan(u)|<=|u|
that i could do it
but i dont get how to prove it is continuous in 0
which is the 2nd line of the question
f(0)=0 as said in the thing, and then yeah i dont think you need more data
the question in itself is "deduce that f is continuous from the right, as it's continuous in 0"
you just insert the inequality |arctan(u)| <= |u| into the integrand in the right side of f(x)
and use f(x) <= |f(x)|
like i do the integral of arctan(u)/u ??
yes that's the definition of f(x)
@harsh crow Has your question been resolved?
but i dont get how to make it countinuous in 0
like how can i know it is continuous in 0
Tu as réussi pour la continuité à droite?
yes you asked that already
did you do this yet
nan je comprends pas comment on trouve comment c'est continu
Fais ce que dit riemann
yeah i tried but i dont understand what to do just after as i cant do limits inside an integral
im sorry im lost lmao
May we see what you have done
do this integral
but why would it mean that, if this goes to 0, the other integral that is f(x) will be continuous ??
Also 0 <= f(x) as x > 0
Continuity definition + gendarmes theorem
i think i dont get the definition of continuity then
but i just need to do the limit of the integral and it will be fine??
lim x -> 0+ f(x) = f(0) is the right side continuity in 0
See
And the exercice gives you f(0) = 0
And you can do the same logic in x -> 0-
i get that yeah it goes to 0 but ig im just bad with continuity
no need it's an odd function
so it's logical
but okay thanks a lot
Oh yeah indeed
thanks lmao it's just that i was idk dumb or thinking too much
i know what's continuity but i wasnt understanding how i was showing the continuity of a function using another
Know that its just a question of limit here
yeah
anyways thanks
i can do the rest
but i may come back later for polynomials lmao
.close
Closed by @harsh crow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’ve recently got a book about electronics and I have few questions
Is d just delta
Is Q charge and what is q
And what is U (not union)
can you show a screenshot?
K
I can send u link if u want
nah just paste it here
Pasted everything
they are using Q to represent the total charge which has flowed through a circuit, whereas q is representing the charge of a hypothetical individual particle
U is potential energy, so U is the electrical potential energy of that a point charge of charge q would have at a given point with voltage V
i'm not sure where d is showing up other than in the derivative
Derivative?
have you taken calculus before?
Nope
ok. have you encountered limits yet?
Limits of what
of functions
I’m just a student at a school
I think d is derivative and Delta is change in a quantity
*9
Ye Ik delta
ok im a bit late but what are you asking rn?
He answered all my questions
ok so the idea of $\odv Qt$ is basically to look at $\adv Qt$ for various sizes of $\adif t$, and notice that as you make $\adif t$ very very close to $0$, a pattern emerges where $\adv Qt$ appears to approach a definite value, which we call the derivative $\odv Qt$
here is a table calculating it for t = 0. You can see that it is approaching 1 = 1 * cos(0)
cloud ☁
this is something you would learn in a calculus class
.solved
Closed by @hearty spear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with my delta math work
like i dont know how to say it exactly, and no its not a test/exam

@true tree Has your question been resolved?
@true tree Has your question been resolved?
do you know isosceles property? Hint: ||(IT has something to do with the angles CAB and DBA being equal)||
yes
type .close to end
do .close
.close
Closed by @true tree
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I didn't read it was a boolean matrix at first so I designed this for standard multiplication
Okay so my proposed algorithm for this is
Supplied with an algorithm multiply(A,B) in O(f(n)) for multiplying nxn matrices,
ALGORITHM power(A, k)
// input: nxn matrix A and power k to raise it to
// output: matrix A^k
B = I // output (identity matrix)
D = A // dummy
p = powerpart2(k)
for i <- 1 to p[0]:
D <- multiply(D,D)
if i in p: B <- multiply(B,D)
return B
ALGORITHM powerpart2(k)
// input: positive integer k
// output: array of indices of 2 that partition k, descending order
// determine the highest power
i <- 1
while 2^(i+1) < k: i <- i + 1
P <- [i]
s <- 2^i
// determine lower powers
while i > 0:
while 2^i > (k - s): i <- i - 1
P[] <- i
s <- s + 2^i
if k = s: break
return P
Here's my analysis which I would like to be evaluated:
First I analyse powerpart2 which is executed once
The basic operation is comparison, which occurs log2(k) times in the first while loop and log2(k)-1 times in the second, so we can write that powerpart2is in O(log(k))
Now the main algorithm, multiply is the basic operation, which is executed 2|p| times in the worst case (when all i in p) further, in the worst case, k = 2^m - 1, so |p| = log2(k+1)
Therefore power is in O(log(k)*f(n)) + O(log(k)) = O(log(k)*f(n))
@cloud hound Has your question been resolved?
@cloud hound Has your question been resolved?
well there is a more convenient way of exponentiation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation_by_squaring
In mathematics and computer programming, exponentiating by squaring is a general method for fast computation of large positive integer powers of a number, or more generally of an element of a semigroup, like a polynomial or a square matrix. Some variants are commonly referred to as square-and-multiply algorithms or binary exponentiation. These c...
nvm
I also wonder about "will boolean matrices have more efficient power algoritm"
@cloud hound Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont know if this is the right server for me to be asking this but...which sci-calc should i choose?
On one hand i could choose the
Caiso FX-570MS which from what ive seen IS allowed on board exams/licensure exams
OR
Casio FX-570ES plus
Which ISNT allowed on board exams and stuff but it looks more.... sophisticated? The orientation atleast.
Are they almost exactly the same?
I couldve sworn the screen is different on the two.
Like look at that, the screen on the ES version looks just slightly bigger and the numbers and stuff looks cleaner. But somehow its not allowed on board/licensure exams.
Do you guys know any calcs (from casio) that has almost the same screen as the 570ES but is allowed on exams and stuff?
Yeah but like i also want to have satisfactory experience while using a calculator.
i like the first one
The smaller screen?
im using it for 5 years and got no problems
Do the numbers not looks weird to you?
pretty clean
Oh.
What does MS and ES even mean?
the integrals just look not familiar compared to plus
Also am i not seeing it but does the ms version not have a = at the top of CALC?
idk that sry
I can see the solve at the top of calc but not =
no it has
the alpha mode has =
the picture just shows shift mode
the only thing is MS's integral not look familiar
if your doing a lot of it use plus
Welp, got no choice i guess
Ill just go for the MS one. These exam calculators are very picky.
.close
Closed by @oak cobalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need herp for Integration by Substitution plz
take t = 3x+1
i got this integration, i got the formule but can't understand how to decide which is v or u
can you show the formula
it is something like that : v'(u(t)) dt = [v(u(t))] ab
to start i heard i should find the v' and the u and then do this part [v(u(t))] ab
🤔
i don't know if it's the right one we just start this chapter
it is like $\int v(u(x))\cdot u'(x)dx = \int v(t)dt$
where $t = u(x)$
i don't know if i could answers that, it's what is on my chapter but if i got t=u, what should i do after ?
method you are using is you derivative of something u(t) in the integral you have
your u(t) here is 3x+1
mb
u=3x+1 u'=3 v=ln(x) v'=1/x
indeed
okey i start to get it but now i got that i should do this part ?
find v(u(t))
then apply limits
okey so i end up with that
a is lower limit b is upper limit
you have to substitute v(u(upper limit)) - v(u(lower limit))
now substiute
v(u(b)) - v(u(a))
ln(10)-ln(2) ?
@clever gale what's wrong ?
yes
so i didn't need to do u' v' or find primitive ?
wdym?
that the final answerd for this and i don't need to do more
you can do log(a) -log(b) = log(a/b)
i mean whith ipp wee have to find primitive and i was thinking wee should do the same for the Integration by Substitution, i find 1.609 at theend
yes apart from simplifying you are done
i'm not sure what do you mean by primitive
but yeah this is answer
ho sorry maybe it's not the same terme, by primitive i mean for exemple a=x what can found a when i derivate it, like x^2/2 -> ' -> = x
that is integrating f(x) = x
may i ask where are you from ?
france
ok
welp thanks for help 😄
no worries
@neat finch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yeah I just didn't get to sit down and run the calcs to check
Anyway I'll repin the original question which was about the anlysis
@cloud hound Has your question been resolved?
no goddamnit
@cloud hound Has your question been resolved?
Pinned
The question is mostly if the analysis is correct (although if the algorithm won't work that would be good to know first 😆)
I think the analysis is correct, althought, specifically for boolean matrices, there is a neat optimization
Since the act of "dotting" rows and columns in boolean algebra is basically
Once you reach at least 1 succesful AND operator you can stop the entire operation
Which would reduce the avg time.
Althought there is surely a faster method
@cloud hound Has your question been resolved?
@cloud hound Has your question been resolved?
There are 2 problems with your algorithm
- your while loop starts at i = 1 and skips 0 completely, which will be problematic for odd k
Ah good point
- even if it did start at 0, you'd get a wrong result, because you square before checking if i in p
It would use a value that overshoots the index by 1
So for i = 0, D would be A² Instead of A
For i = 1, D = A⁴ instead of A² and so on
I'll make the changes (when I get back to computer) and get back to you 👍 thank you! (Ofc if you have anything else to mention you can continue, I'll see it in about two hours)
You gotta put it after the if statement (and outside of it of course)
Everything else including the analysis looks good
Okay here is the improved algorithm
ALGORITHM power(A, k)
// input: nxn matrix A and power k to raise it to
// output: matrix A^k
B = I // output (identity matrix)
D = A // dummy
p = powerpart2(k)
for i <- 0 to p[0]:
if i in p: B <- multiply(B,D)
D <- multiply(D,D)
return B
Since I (somehow) got the worst case analysis right I will also try best case analysis
Ah I see powerpart2 is inefficient (currently the inner while loop executes all the way before checking if k = s)
So it's best case is probably also in omega(log(k))
But we can fix that
ALGORITHM powerpart2(k)
// input: positive integer k
// output: array of indices of 2 that partition k, descending order
// determine the highest power
i <- 1
while 2^(i+1) < k: i <- i + 1
P <- [i]
s <- 2^i
// determine lower powers
while i > 0:
if k = s: break
while 2^i > (k - s): i <- i - 1
P[] <- i
s <- s + 2^i
return P
Just a lot of simple things with moving the checks in the loops up
Now
In the best case, k is a power of 2, in which case the comparison in the first while loop of powerpart2 executes log2(k) times and the second short circuits
Ah well it's still in $\Omega(\log(k))$
Coolempire93
So that means $\texttt{powerpart2}(k) \in \Theta(\log(k))$
Coolempire93
Now to the other algorithm
I'm going to try to write an algorithm specifically for boolean matrices next
I was trying to avoid diagonalizability (in both cases really) since I'm not familiar with it
As before, powerpart2 is executed once
And because k is a power of 2, array p only contains one element
regardless the multiplication operation occurs between p[0]+1 and 2(p[0]+1) number of times, so we are still in log(k)
In conclusion
$\texttt{power(A,k)} \in \Theta(\log(k) \cdot f(n))$, where $A$ is an $n \times n$ matrix
Coolempire93
Now to see if there's anything special for the boolean case (but if anyone comes by feel free to check my analysis once again)
On a completely unrelated note, i learn that boolean (logic) matrices are isomorphic to binary relations
And matrix product is isomorphic to composition
I mean boolean vectors are isomorphic to sets [in a powerset] so this makes sense
But yeah you can use boolean matrices to check properties of relations
Like the product to check transitivity
Reflexivity along the diagonal and symmetry by symmetry
or antisymmetry
anyways
Tbh i havent came up with much past the obvious improvement of the "stop evaluating past a succesful AND"
Which as far as my understanding goes reduces avg time from n^3 to n^2.5
How did you obtain that analysis
Hmmm
In analyzing by hand I obtain an unexpected result
I think it must be wrong
I get $\mqty[A & B \ C & D]^2 = \mqty[A + BC & B(A + D) \ C(A + D) & BC + D]$ which looks good, but then I get $\mqty[A & B \ C & D]^4 = \mqty[A + BC & B \ C & BC + D]$
Coolempire93
Which would mean that you end up with the same A + BC , B, C, BC + D matrix when you raise the original to the 16th power, 64th, etc
yeah i think something went wrong
Let's check the second term
the ^2 version is correct if thats what you mean
\begin{align*}
A^3B + 2AB^2 + BD^3 + ABD^2 + A^2BD + 2B^2CD &= AB + AB + BD + ABD + ABD + BCD \
&= B(A + D + AD + CD) \
&= B(A + D)
\end{align*}
Coolempire93
that's weird how did I get just B
Wait B(A + D) was what was in the ^2 matrix
Surely it can't stabilize after just one composition
O.o
personally i found some matrices that switch between 2 states
,tex
$\begin{bmatrix}
0&1&0\
1&0&0\
1&1&0
\end{bmatrix}$
Yeah but an aribitrary one?
I just tested a few and the two did it
I wouldnt be surprised
Althought i ought to believe some approach a full 1 matrix and others a full 0
Oh this is also interesting the bottom element is just BC
Okay well I guess since any direct rules are difficult let's see what I can do for actually doing the calculation
becomes
1. a+abc+bcd -> a + (a+d)bc -> a + bcd
2. ab+bc+bd+abd -> b(a+c+d+ad) -> b(a+c+d)
3. bc+ac+cd+acd -> c(b+a+d+ad) -> c(a+b+d)
4. abc+d+bcd -> d + (a+d)bc -> d + abc
Yeah that's what I got as well
Somehow just messed up the multiplication by abcd again
Is this one the 5th power?
Which doesn't make sense because if you have a total order it won't be AH
I see
it's because it's 2x2
$\mqty[1 & 1 \ 0 & 0] \odot \mqty [1 & 1 \ 0 & 0] = \mqty[1 & 0 \ 0 & 0]$
$\mqty[1 & 0 \ 0 & 0] \odot \mqty[1 & 1 \ 0 & 0] = \mqty[1 & 1 \ 0 & 0]$
Coolempire93
R = {(0,0), (0,1)}
Compose
R(R) = {(0,0)}
Compose
R(R(R)) = {(0,0), (0,1)}
But
R = {(0,0), (1,2), (2,3)}
R(R) = {(2,3)}
R(R(R)) = {}
The eigenvalue of $\mqty[1 & 1 \ 0 & 0]$ is $\mqty|1 XOR \lambda & 1 \ 0 & 0 XOR \lambda| = (1 XOR \lambda)(0 XOR \lambda) \vee 0 = 0 \vee 0 = 0$ supposing these act like standard eigenvalues
Coolempire93
ALGORITHM booleanmultiply(A, B)
// input: nxn matrices A and B
// output matrix C = AB
// row-by-column multiplication
// let the matrices be indexed A[row][column]
for row <- 1 to n:
for col <- 1 to n:
C[row][col] <- 0
for k <- 1 to n:
if AND(A[row][k], B[k][col]):
C[row][col] <- 1
break
return C
I suppose the brute force method looks something like this
Taking the basic operation to be the AND operation,
In the worst case we never short circuit (all 0's matrix) so $\texttt{booleanmultiply}(A,B) \in O(n^3)$ and in the best case every value short circuits (all 1's matrix) so $\texttt{booleanmultiply}(A,B) \in \Omega(n^2)$
Coolempire93
Thus we have $\texttt{power}(A,k) \in \Omega(n^2\log(k))$ and $\texttt{power}(A,k) \in O(n^3\log(k))$
Coolempire93
Can anyone verify if this looks right?
In the meantime, I'll now attempt the optimization based on boolean matrices as relations and matrix multiplication as composition
Recalling that (AB)[i][j] = 1 when there exists 1 in A[i][k] and 1 in B[k][j], i.e., i ~ k ~ j (i relates to k under A, k relates to j under B)
So we can calculate the values in A^k directly from A simply by following along this path (and we will see what the efficiency is like)
Actually now that I begin to write this out I realize this quickly devolves into a graph search
The composition essentially creates a digraph where we start at the ith root and check each path of length k to see if it ends at j
A* won't work here because there's no heuristic for how 'close' or 'far' you are from j
I assume DFS would work better than BFS but I'm not sure
In terms of time both have O(V + E) complexity
In the worst case, we would have an all 1's matrix
So each i relates to every j, and so on
Gives us $n\binom{n}{1} = n^2$ edges and $k*n$ vertices so $\in O(n^2 + kn) = O(n^2)$
Coolempire93
Which is faster than the other algorithm in the best case
Used your idea to come up with an even better algorithm
Essentially looks like
Is there any actual meaning for the det of a boolean matrix?
No clue
I guess for 2x2 it tells you if it's reflexive or if 1~2 and 2~1 (the opposite ig xd), and then for higher using the minors if it's all reflexive or 1~2 and 2~1 and 3~2/2~3 and 3~1
Ah
It tells you if it has a permutation embedded 😂
Useless info
At least for a relation
Knowing if it's 1~1 and 2~2 (det 1) vs 1~2 and 2~1 (also det 1) is important
And it could even be a combination
I guess in general it tells you if the digraph of the relation has all elements involved in (some form of) cycle
But it doesn't inform transitivity because you need all of the edges to form cycles
And det 0 doesn't mean it's antitransitive either
Not even that it's not transitive
Wait I'm thinking of symmetry
I'll have to think about transitivity in a secon
Let me finish the algorithm first 😂
ALGORITHM booleanpower(A, k)
// input: matrix A, power k to raise it to
// output: matrix A^k
// to determine the value of A^k[i][j]
// we attempt to find i ~ l1 ~ l2 ... ~ l(k-1) ~ j
// storing relationships in an array along the way for cache access in later steps (this represents each 'layer' of the graph)
G = // all 0's kxnxn matrix
B = // nxn output matrix
// DFS
for i <- 1 to n: // row in A^k
for j <- 1 to n: // col in A^k
M = // k-length array of 0's
M[1] = i
l = 2 // relationship #
while 0 < l <= k:
for m <- M[l]+1 to n: // search until find i ~ m
if A[M[l]][m] == 1:
G[l][M[l]][m] <- 1 // mark M[l] ~ m at lth step
M[l+1] <- m
break
if M[l+1] == 0: l <- l-1 // M[l] relates to no elements
else: l <- l + 1
if l = k+1:
if M[l] = j: B[i][j] = 1
else: l <- l - 1 // go back, path not found
return B
Okay I just quickly finished the algorithm without using the graph idea (pretend those lines aren't there for now, since the graph is never read)
Essentially brute force DFS reading through the matrix A every time
Supposing as usual that the algorithm is correct (hopefully it's stll readable enough for you to debug), our analysis proceeds
Basic operation is checking if A[M[l]][m] == 1 (that is, if M[l] relates to m under A)
Using the all 0's matrix as a worst case, we can see that the inner inner for loop runs the max amount of times
Because no path will every be found
No
That's not necessarily worst, it'll short circuit after the first round
Not sure it's possible to engineer a matrix A such that the inner inner for loop runs the maximum possible amount of times every time (that is, it has to check every single path and the one to reach j is always last)
But supposing it is
The maximum number of times would yield $\frac{n(n-1)}{2}$ basic operations, the while loop would run through all $k-1$ values , and then we multiply by $n^2$ for the outer for loops, yielding $\texttt{booleanpower}(A,k) \in O(k\cdot n^4)$
Coolempire93
But again I doubt this is possible
It's funny because both the all 0's and all 1's matrices for this are great cases
For the all 0's, you get n^2*k operations, and for the all 1's, you get n^2*k operations
Damn that's still worse than the other one though
Have I determined these two correctly?
@cloud hound Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got the stars and bar method confused
the first one
yes
alr got it thanks a lot
I never memorize it tbh
NO THANK YOU GOOD SIR
lmao ok
Closed by @lone void
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
also thanks for the help
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
√(ii) + (11) = √-1+1 = √0
There's a video on this
Yes, that's where I got the problem, but I still don't understand how it is √2
Ah
Well that would be because we're putting it down into real space
"i" isn't the length of the side
|i| = 1 is the length of the side
Consider if you drew the triangle in the opposite direction
The sides would be -1 and i
But the length of -1 is |-1| = 1
And the length of i is |i| = 1
Now you can apply pythagorean theorem
Closed by @covert gale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this question here;
Factor the given polynomial completely
- I'm stuck at trying to find the greatest common factor and cannot get to the next step.
- Second problem is factoring afterwards
just use the quadratic formula
Don't you see a common factor
In coefficients
ncie
i just need to apply it mainly
the way i wouldve done it is using the AC method but factoring gets more annoying
270 from multiplying and wouldve had to find the gcf from that (my main point where I'm stuck at)
Where is 270
x^2+51x+270
Another question?
i think im just mixing different methods together and getting confused
no
its 18x^2+51x+15
18*15
What is AC method
Factor 3 first
What is the factored polynomial
Solve quadratic inside bracket
so division again?
wait nvm
im stuck
ohh ok i see
its what i had done earlier
but NOW i do have to the AC method
ok ok so uh
i know to multiply a*c which is 30 and match b
which is 15+2 = 17
mb i put 7 instead of 2
and 15*2=30
(2x+5)(3x+1)
got it
:D
wait
Shoot
i fogro the 3
YAYYY
.close
Closed by @proven halo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi I currently have a math homework on Forces and Friction, I wasn't in for the lesson as I had an exam and my maths teacher gave us this homework today to give in Tomorrow but I have no idea what I'm doing since I wasn't in the lesson. Could anybody help me? I'm okay with the force pushing up the hill but once the force is horizontal I have no idea.
can you rotate it please
yes ofc one second
,rccw
oh thank you!
soln or explaination
wdym?
should i give you the solution or the explaination @shy skiff
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
I need more of hybrid, I need to understand it or I won't be able to do it in exams
ok so vc or chat ?
uh is chat okay?
okay sure
I bet you are familiar with coordinates and stuff, so here is a hint
(plus you should apply the sum of forces according to each axis)
don't forget the weight btw
yes right now I have up to that point, I'm now trying to work out the line perpendicular to the slope. I cant figure out if im supposed to add 10cos30 and 12sin30 or to subtract them
Im not that sure what im actually working out, I missed this entire chapter due to an exam overlapping
well, it all depends of the orientation of your axis
if it's in the same direction then it's +, if it's the opposite it's -
and always friction is the opposite direction as movement so if it's a hill, and the object is falling, the friction will try to get it up and avoid its fall
so are the axis relative to the slope? if so how do i know if its in the same direction? the horizontal force is going diagonal relative to the slope's axis
umm, not really Its kind of like what my teacher does, i dont really understand the math
you are free to choose whatever direction, after all since it's all relative, then if the arrow is directing up, then everything will change, each + become a - and vice-versa
but in the end you should find the same result,
just make sure the x axis is parallel to the slope so you can do the stuff with cos and sin and so weight doesn't cancel out so you can see its effect really on both axis
you are actually very close to solving it
if the arrow of the force is pointing in the same direction as the axis then it a + else it's a -
dw you are doing great
but when it comes to the resolve going up the slope
i dont know what to do, I have an example using a smooth surface
but that was before the friction chapter
This horizontal force is throwing me completely off, I've never encountered it
I think my diagram might be completely wrong honestly
just add a vector f_x and f_y to each equation
and since you will suppose it will stay in its position you will take each equation = 0
and you find f_x and f_y
it is in equilibrium after all
Uhmmm... Vector f_x? Idk if that's just another format of writing vectors or something...
I think I may have learning difficulties 😭 I have never been tested for it though because I got through GCSE with 7s and 8s so there was no need but at A level I'm just a D student, I can't do the exam questions because they aren't anything like the examples in lessons
it's smth like this
well I might have smth wrong because I am not totally focusing on it
those are your forces
and you got your axis
do the projections according to x and y
and don't forget you can move your vectors however you like if it helps with project
a vector got an infinite number of representatives you you can move them all to the center, the intersection of the two axis
it might help a bit with that 12N force
and about angles, draw triangles it will help
see? you can calculate each angle
hopefully it helps
@shy skiff Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @shy skiff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
tutorial
less go
look for similar angles
or supplementary
use them to relate the two angles together
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
its wrong anyway
i was just confirming if i was right
the answer is 129 but idk how to show my work
like where do I start
I’m allowed to like plug it into desmos and stuff
If that’s needed
hey can I get some real help thanks
im being deadass? describe how you got 129
relate the angles together
The answer was obviously fucking given now the essential reason I made this is to figure out how to SHOW MY WORK
Like I said already
example can be u can point out which angles are complementary
anyways can I get some real help from a actual kind individual.
you can label some of the angles
and which are like alternate, exterier etc
and determine if they are corresponding to each other or supplementary
okay so u can say that since cbe = 14x +17 then abe must be 180-cbe
then mention the property used
<@&268886789983436800>
Aren’t they congruent
wdum congruent
They both would be equal to each other
abe and cbe?
Cbe and feh
yes and how did u figure that out?
✅
Closed by @pallid karma
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
yay np
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, could someone check if this proof looks good please?
\begin{Definition}[Divisibility]
A nonzero integer $a$ is said to \emph{divide} an integer $b$, written $a \mid b$, if $b = ak$ for some integer $k$.
\end{Definition}
\begin{Lemma}
Let $a$, $b$, and $c$ be integers, and let $p$ be a prime.
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $p \ \cancel\mid \ a$, then $\gcd(p,a) = 1$.
\item If $a \mid bc$ and $\gcd(a, b) = 1$, then $a \mid c$.
\item If $p \mid bc$, then either $p \mid b$ or $p \mid c$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{Lemma}
\begin{Definition}[Subset of a set]
Suppose $A$ and $B$ are sets. If every element in $A$ is also an element $B$, then $A$ is a \emph{subset} of $B$, which is denoted $A \subseteq B$.
\end{Definition}
\begin{Definition}[Intersection of sets]
The \emph{intersection} of sets $A$ and $B$ is the set $A \cap B = { x : x \in A \text{ and } x \in B}$.
\end{Definition}
\begin{Theorem}
Assume $A = {n \in \mathbb{Z} : 2 \mid n}$, $B = {n \in \mathbb{Z} : 9 \mid n}$, $C = {n \in \mathbb{Z} : 6 \mid n}$.
Then, $A \cap B \subseteq C$.
\end{Theorem}
\begin{proof}
Let $x \in A \cap B$.
Then, by the definition of the intersection, $$x \in A \text{ and } x \in B.$$
This means that $$2 \mid x \text{ and } 9 \mid x.$$
By the definition of divisibility, we have that
$$x = 2k \text{ and } x = 9l$$ for some integers $k$ and $l$.
So $2k = 9l$. This means that $2 \mid 9l$.
Since 2 is prime, by lemma 2.c, either $2 \mid 9$ or $2 \mid l$.
Because $2 \ \cancel\mid \ 9$, we have that $2 \mid l$ is true.
Then, by definition of divisibility $l = 2m$ for some integer $m$.
So, $$x = 9l = 3(3)(2l) = 6(3l)$$.
Since $l$ is an integer, so is $3l$.
And, by definition of divisibility, $6 \mid x$.
Since $x$ was chosen arbitrarily, it holds for any $x$.
Thus, $x \in C$.
We shown that $x \in A \cap B$ implies $x \in C$, therefore, by the definition of subset,
$$A \cap B \subseteq C.$$
\end{proof}
Mor Bras
@earnest mirage Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> 👋
<@&286206848099549185>
@earnest mirage Has your question been resolved?
i think its good
im not a helper but
Thanks for your response!
<@&286206848099549185> Could someone else check the proof please?
yes it's fine
Looks good
can u help me
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
Closed by @earnest mirage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help with this circuit design i js have no idea where to start
did they give you a schematic or did you build this by yourself?
also this isn't really a math question I'd recommend asking elsewhere
that image is the only schematic/requirements the teacher gave us
where is the schematic diagram
yeah ive asked in a physics server but got no response 😭
that would be helpful
we don't have a diagram on that
okay i'll try asking
also u have to be patient cuz I understand not many ppl responds right away
I asked a circuit question before and they haven't responds for 3 months lol
honestly it seems a bit complicated without knowing the schematic 
yup 😭😭
@uneven shale Has your question been resolved?
@uneven shale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
HELLO
ANYONE ONLINE
do you have a math question?
many are
!da2a
Asking the actual question right away is more likely to get responses.
Asking "Can I ask...?" or "Does anyone know about...?" doesn't give people enough information to decide whether they can help, and answering can feel like a promise to help with the actual question, which they might find themselves unable to.
@shut gust Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Anyone online
yes?
Good MOrining
do u have a question
!da2a
Asking the actual question right away is more likely to get responses.
Asking "Can I ask...?" or "Does anyone know about...?" doesn't give people enough information to decide whether they can help, and answering can feel like a promise to help with the actual question, which they might find themselves unable to.
I Need Help Solving Binary Subtraction
Like this question
00000011-01100100
Can Anyone guide me how to solve this 00000011-01100100
do you know how to do column subtraction in base ten?
yeah
ok and in base two?
well your binary numbers are meant to be 2's complement signed integers right
just imagine there is a "1" to the left of the 0000 0011 (the top number)
then subtract as normal but borrowing from this phantom 1
Wait What How will it work will it not ruin the answer
that, or turn 0110 0100 into its negative & then add to 0000 0010
it won't.
Ok
it'll give you the correct signed binary representation
you're welcome but no sorry
ok no problem see yaa
i just asking for help using it but if you dont want its ok bye buddy
what is the denery value of 1111000 in 2s complement
.close
Closed by @shut gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
When you get the value of an intergral, do you get the radii of the sum of all of the dx right??
Like you dont get the whole circle thing just the radii of it.
Like do you only get this
Or do you get this whole thing
Then yes, you get this. The area between x=a, x=b, the function and the x-axis
????
Oooh, for a second i thought you get like the whole thingy majiggy
Thats what i used
Yeah but that one is a totally different integral
And still, why were you talking about circles?
Maybe advanced studying isnt for me i think i mightve skipped a few too many
Yeah I have such a hunch too
Hold on can i send links here
Cover the basics well, then you can go more advanced
shouldn't pi be multiplying the function squared for it to be an integral of volume of revolution?
Yea
that would be rotating it by pi with respect to x axis and adding
This is what i based it off of, thought i understood it and i tried to recreate the graph they showed as best as i can.
110.4K likes, 402 comments. “Olivia Rodrigo and Mike tyson explain volume of a solid of revolution🔥🔥 ⚠️DISCLAIMER⚠️: This is not real audio/video of Olivia Rodrigo or Mike Tyson and they did not actually say the things you see in the video. They’re deep fakes made with AI. #onlock #math #engineering #integration #volume #STEM #...
To be fair...i wasnt even sure if what theyre saying is correct or not.
Yeah ok I get now what you were talking about
I can't open the link cause I don't have tik tok unfortunately
But I believe they were saying something correct
Also notice this @oak cobalt
So its just what i created on desmos that was wrong?
Without knowing what you wanted to do, it's hard to say
the definite integral you wrote on the first line will just give you a number, not plot the cone
if you wanted to plot the cone, you should use a 3d graphing calculator
Do you know any?
desmos has one
What i was trying to know was if THIS was getting the correct value of THAT function
Man, maybe im not on that level yet...
Well...
The first one is a NUMBER
The second one is a FUNCTION
So they're totally different things
Well then...what should i put to get the area under than function?
And that integral neither gives you the area enclosed nor the volume of the solid obtained by revolving f around the x-axis
Simply the integral from a to b of f(x)
So like this?
yep
Exactly
Is this still correct? Or do i change something on the first one?
the first line will give you the area between 0 and 5 for any function f(x) you write, so you don't need to change it