#help-23
1 messages Ā· Page 367 of 1
if we write $q = 1 - p$, then $G_X(x) = q^n + \frac{p}{q}\frac{1-q^nx^n}{1-qx}$
Raphaelisius Maximus MMIII
Im not sure it's supposed to be that long since it's supposed to be written on a whiteboard for an oral
that's a bad U'
Fuck
I forgot to remove the 1
I know i did
And i thought about it before writing it
And for the rest there may be a mistake too
n-1 and not +1 but i didnt make the mistake on my fraction
$G_X'(x) = \frac pq \frac{-nq^nx^{n-1}(1-qx) + q(1-q^nx^n)}{(1-qx)^2}$
Raphaelisius Maximus MMIII
Why the p/q tho??
did you forget the coefficient in front of the sum
Tho i'll remember it tomorrow
yeah we forgot to factor by the first term
We're missing a (1-p)x then??
Raphaelisius Maximus MMIII
which I'll admit looks pretty bad from here
why px ?? why not (1-p)x ??
but tbh dw much about it i mainly needed the method to do it
tho the next questions will be annoying to deal with but i know i have them in my copybook somewhere
so thank you for the help
have a nice day or a good night or idk
.close
Closed by @harsh crow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
quick question, how can i prove a matrice cant be inverted ?? i have this one:
-2 0 -2
1 0 1
1 0 1
i want to say that by no operation with the gauss-jordan method we can find the identity matrice but idk if it's enough, and i'd like to have another method
the rows aren't linearly independent
Or, the determinant is 0
we dont have determinants for matrices of order 3
we cant use it
oh okay you are in precalculus math
yes, you would use the fact that there is a column of all 0s then
but how can i write it??
like what can tell me "no, you cant invert that matrice"
with numbers
it depends how much work your teacher wants you to show
you can set it up as system of 3 equations, and show there is no solution
i tried but i just end up with x=-z
and idk what to say after that
yeah, that should be enough to say the inverse does not exist
you set up Ax = 0 right
yeah
yes, if there is a general solution (not just 0,0,0) for Ax = 0, then it is not invertable
oh and the inverse exists if the solutions are x=0 y=0 z=0 and it's not the case
yeah
and as there i dont have that it's not invertable yeah
check with your teacher, but that should be enough
@harsh crow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @harsh crow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello!
I was wondering if anyone would have free time check my proof for a Linear Algebra theorem. teacher told me that we get 10 points back as extra credit on the test if we can write it without notes (ill memorize it ig) so it will mean allot
thank you!
Theorem: If H is a subspace of V and dim V = dim H, then V = H
for ref. our teacher told us to only use the stuff learned so far, which includes:
- Systems of Linear Equations 2. Matrix Arithmetic 3. Determinants 4. Linear Independence 5. Vector Spaces
it's a bit too drawn out
the part with contradiction is not really necessary
the fact that you have dimV linearly independent vectors is enough to say that span(B) = V
oh... i felt that too when I was writing that
it seems a bit too complicated, maybe because you're not allowed to use some things
in n-dim space every n-element linearly independent set is a basis, so B_h is automatically a basis of V and basis determines the spanned space uniquely
what are facts about bases you're allowed to use?
So do I omit the "proof by contradiction" part and state this?
it might be worthwhile to consider this
We arent given a list of "facts" that i can actually use...
let me try to find
the following two facts are usually proven in a linear algebra class:
if dimV = n, then
- n linearly independent vectors form a basis for V
- a spanning set of n vectors forms a basis for V
that's all?
yea... i dont have "facts" that i can use in the proof (maybe im not aware of them) . The fact you mentioned is probably not what our teacher proved
i don't know how in depth a proof will be then
i think this one is equivalent to what we said?
oh it is? i didnt realize it. sorry i am very new to linear algebra
our teacher did sya "You can prepare for this outside of class with your own research" so i can technically use stuff outside
just not really advanced stuff
from what i understand, i thought that statement means that you can create new basis with an existing basis with equal number of linearly independent vectors
But not necessarily extend to a new subspace right?
so you'd have
- H is of dimension n so it has n-element basis B_h
- H is a subset of V so each element of B_h is an element of V
- hence, B_h is a n-element linearly independent set of vectors in V
- (this is kinda obvious but to match the sentence in your pictures) since every element of B_h is an element of V, it can be written as a linear combination of some basis in V
- so B_h is a basis of V (this follows from the sentence i circled and last two points)
- since B_h is a basis of H, span(B_h) = H, same with V, span(B_h) = V
- ergo V = H
ohhhh, i think its starting to make a bit more sense
but you're not proving that it's a basis for the subspace H
you're taking vectors from H - which are also vectors of V, because subspace - and proving that they are basis for V
i reccomend checking out Friedberg's Insel Spence's coverage of this topic
it's definitely accessible for your level
but they give a lot of care
ohh ic. thanks. I will rewrite the proof and make it a bit shorter
thank you for the help
ahh is that a lecture?
oh that would be helpful thanks
it's a textbook
oh
in general if you plan on entering any STEM degree then linear algebra is a must
so picking up a textbook sooner or later is inevitable
fwiw, i don't think what you did originally is technically wrong, but it is morally wrong
yeaa truu. im planning on going into ML so its even more important lol
š morally?
im not comitting a sin? right?!
yea ML and pretty much all numerical calculations are based on linalg
yes, in the sense that the proof should follow more immediately from more general facts at your disposal
like the two that i mentioned earlier
you're going to the linalg hell sorry 
ahh ic. yea, i was def taking a long route
bro my high schooler teacher frying me bru š
since its not that rigorous, it lacks allot of conceptual understanding that makes it hard for me to gain intuition
its more about "these are the steps memorize them and then do the test"
(sadly)
but yeah, it comes from experience but it's usually the principle to use already proved facts and lemmas before trying something more elementary
sometimes you cannot escape it though and you have to modify a proof of some even known theorems, so it's not really "morally wrong", it's just inefficient to do that all the time
yea. i was looking up proofs online, and i was so confused why lammas keep appearing in the proofs š thanks for all the help tho. I will write a shorter proof now
if you're familiar with some programming then lemmas are like functions - lets you split the proof into smaller chunks and reuse the "code"
ohh its like abstraction
LOL
MB MB
honestly tho, when i first learned about linear algebra, it was so fascinating. I have always liked math, but linear algebra is like a whole new world that i had never seen
yeah exactly, theorems/lemmas are kind of abstractions, you use them out-of-the-box without looking inside unless you really need to
(it's useful to know how they work inside though)
it is quite fascinating, especially in numerical part of math
you can do a LOT of fun stuff with vector spaces even in higher math
oh, thats so similar to abstraction. im wondering, are "lemmas" universally defined? or does it change book by book or course by curse
Yea, it really opened ALLOT of cool stuff i had never known before
no, it's just a word for helper theorems more or less
oh
like, if you're writing a paper then you usually name only the important results "theorems" and rest as lemmas
seems okay at first glance
@arctic gull Has your question been resolved?
no i just mean that i'm a bit sleepy so i might miss something but it looks okay
but someone else can check it too
ohh, ic
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is vf for the chp 0?

wdym, v_f is for the CHP officer here? I mean, both the speedster and the CHP would have their separate v_f's if that's what you mean
v_f is not going to be 0, no, for the chp officer
The officer needs to start speeding up and must be moving significantly faster than the guy by the time he catches up to him
@crystal owl Has your question been resolved?
Ye u got it
awesome sauce
All parts correct methinks
.close
Closed by @crystal owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
did i do this wrong? when i plug in my t into my kinematic wquations i grt 2 diffansers
,rcw
(21.5 s) is WRONG @crystal owl
Correct answer:
Time to catch = 30.15 s
Speederās distance = ā1296 m
how did u get thaf
You dont seem to be really including the 56 m/s top speed anywhere
He is just accelerating forever
do i need to
i used vit+at^2=delta x
@crystal owl lol you treated the officer as if he accelerates forever at 4 m/s²,
but the problem says the officerās car has a top speed of 56 m/s.
vi is 0
If the officer accelerates at 4 m/s^2 for 21.5 seconds he would be going 86 m/s
Thats like
oh i get it
Way over the top speed
i have to us vf
Yeah
this assumes:
the officer keeps accelerating the whole time
the officerās speed becomes greater than 56 m/s (impossible)
Just chug it in
the mistake u did is here lol
Yuh
howd be get 30
oh right okay now i gotta get another t
This is how long until you hit max speed
yeah
By t = 14 you want to see the distances of both By that point
Once you find those, subtract them
Thats the distance the officer needs to cut down now
Does that make sense in some way?
i understand what ur saying with that but subtrack tbem wherev
Like
Relative to the starting point
If officer moved 500 metres
Ans thr guy moved 700 metres
Whats the distance between them
200
Yeah thats basically what im saying for u to find
First find this
pkay
Then this
Then that
Hmm?
What is it thats confusing you right now
my teacher is doing it in the board right now she has 2 phases for the spoeder and the chp
Oh damn this is live 
Yes youre in the second phase now lol
First phase was when he was accelerating
Like
Lets say i just asked you to tell me how long it would take somebody moving at blah speed to catch up to another person moving at blah speed when they are 200 metres apart
Would you be able to do that
yeah
but hes accelerating
He stopped
Like
By the time he finishes accelerating (t = 14 s) what is the distance between them
Thags what u need to find
392
No
Like
That's the officer's distance relative to the starting point
Not the distance between him and the guy
Do what you just did here but for the guy as well, what do you get
which guy
The speeder
602
@crystal owl did ya get the answer?
Yeah
210+x
So now whats the situation
They are 210 m apart
One guy moving at 56 m/s
The other at 43 m/s
You want to find how long until officer catches up to the other guy
How do you do that
yes um
are u still stuck in the same question?
yipperdipperdoo
ahh wait
system of ewuations?
no
wait where is + x coming from
then what
Whats x even
Of what
yeah ig she/he might speak on egyptian i get it
If you are running 10 m/s and im running 5 m/s, what's your "catch-up" speed to me
5 m/s
Yeah
yes
@crystal owl What do we know about both cars at the moment the chase begins? lets start with your basic knowledge
Whats the officer's "catch-up" speed
for me?
43 m/s? šš
oohoho im failing this class
I mean u subtracted them earlier here
Do the same, basically
@crystal owl first understand the situation this officer guy still helples
Speeder already moving at 43 m/s
Officer starts from rest (0 m/s)
Officer accelerates at 4 m/s²
They start at the same position (speeder passes the officer)
so the officer is cooked ryt now
You're like so not following the chat 
?
catch-up speed only works when both objects are already moving. At the moment the chase starts, the officerās speed is 0 because he was parked, So first step: what is the speederās distance after t seconds?
Write just that down.
You're like pretty much done almost lol
This is more or less the last thing you need to find
Which goes by the same logic as this
16.15
you were just overcomplicating it at the beginning
@crystal owl Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @crystal owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Normally we check the endpoints for the interval of convergence, but that's not a step in this problem. Is that just because plugging 1/12 & -1/12 into the substituted version of the power series results in 1^k which diverges, and they skipped explaining that? I wasn't sure since if you put 1/12 back into the original series you get a geometric series which converges since r < 1
Yeah dude basically they're just asking for the radius and not the entire domain
Key distinction
Closed by @fiery junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Minimal cut is removing edges not vertexes
Yeah, things like that
What do you mean?
Write down the cut you are thinking
In this style
A cut means that by removing the edges, your graph becomes two disconnected parts
So cut 3 isnāt a cut
Yeah
Because a minimum cut has to have weight 2 in your case, all edges have weight 1, you canāt find two edges forming a cut other than the two you have given
Probably more time to get used to it you will be fine
@sullen elm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i get help
I need help with this true/false question
T^2=id
by sending any message, ideally one containing your question, in a help channel without a name on it.
anyway, you did that
either see @feral linden's comment, or share your thoughts so far with us
My intention was gā¢f being injective -> f is injective, gā¢f being surjective-> g is surjective, completely unaware that this hint itself has become an answer.
So not on me. A bad coincidence
@stone fjord Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok so i kn ow h ow to do a
but b is confusing me
so far i have
2lnx times 2/7lny
or 2u times 2/7v
,tex .log rules
riemann
split this into a sum first using first row from the table
2lnx + 2/7lny
good
slight consideration: In this particular case you actually have the abs value of both logarithms here.
Because x^2 and y^2 as part of your original function of x and y.
but x and y are both stated to be positive
themselves
so you don't need any of that modulus nonsense
in any case you would put them inside the log and not outside
What is "it"
the equation
like well
ok...
i trulu need helpto understand...
girl
.close
Closed by @maiden nacelle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I have this one problem: Find the remainder when divide 7^2025 by 13
Have you studied congruences
I managed to find that t^2025=7^9 mod 13 using fermat little theorem
But I don't know how to continue
Like actually doing the calculation?
yes
gimme a min
You make it sound like you're calculating decimal digits of pi lol
this should take two seconds
7^2 does not need a computer
I just memorize square numbers cuz I can't do them mentally
What would be a smaller numerical answer. Try a - sign
you absolutely need to be able to multiply small numbers for this
that would be -3
Yeez
Now use that result
I am going to have you do some squaring amd multiplication btw
Put $7^2 \equiv -3 \mod 13$
mod 7?
sorry
Adhi
mb
oh it's okay
what do you get now
uh.. wait
Adhi
So it's really 3^4*7 mod 13
now whats 3^2 and what's it modulo 13
I was afraid I did that wrong
Oh yeah...
now put this in the equation
so 4^2*7?
16
I now my square numbers thankfully
21
note that you could have done it directly like this without invoking fermat's little theorem but thats fine ig
so what is the remainder then
8
yeee
š
it is helpful to do a little mental math sometimes.
but cool, you got your answer, any follow up questions?
I don't know, I always use calculator. I rely on it too much tho
nothing wrong with a calculator but it is too much friction to do say 4 * 13 or 2 * 17
I'll probably, I'm new to number theory and I'm doing problem set atm
it take me around a min to do each
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @fading mural
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
don't you already have one channel though
.close
Closed by @opaque fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If sin A = m sinB and tanA = n tanB, prove that (m^2 - 1)/(n^2 - 1) = cos^2 (A)
light work after dividing one equation by the other to get\\
$\cos(A) = \frac{m}{n}\cos(B)$
and squaring of course
seems logical
Oh smart
@verbal kite Has your question been resolved?
@verbal kite
didnt need to really give him the solution like that
What the hell
should i delete?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Cam someone help me solve this?
A NCERT give me bad vibe, anyway isn't there's already a solution
yeah this is a worked example and the solution is written right there
then it's probably better you say which step you don't understand, and why.
Closed by @fleet zealot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
nvm I figured it out
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If sin A = m sinB and tanA = n tanB, prove that (m^2 - 1)/(n^2 - 1) = cos^2 (A)
I wanna share my solution.
And want improvements for it.
m = sin(A)/sin(B) and n = tan(A)/tan(B)
m/n = cos(A)/cos(B)
m^2 cos^2 (B) / n^2 = cos^2(A) - (1)
Now m sin(B) = sin(A)
m^2 sin^2 (B) = sin^2 (A)
m^2 - m^2 cos^2 (B) = 1 - cos^2 (A)
m^2 cos^2 (B) = m^2 + cos^2 (A) - 1
Put this in (1).
(m^2 + cos^2 (A) - 1)/n^2 = cos^2(A)
n^2 cos^2 (A) = cos^2 (A) + m^2 - 1
cos^2 (A) = (m^2 - 1)/(n^2 -1)
here's one improvement:
get some line breaks in there so that the solution doesn't read like it was deliberately obfuscated
seems perfecto
No shorter way?
i mean you can manipulate it some other way
but it would be the same
just the algebra part
or componendo dividendo idk
actually no idk
Closed by @verbal kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thanks btw.
yeah you could find $\frac{m+1}{m-1}$, $\frac{n+1}{n-1}$ and multiply both from the first step but it might be a bit more tedious (maybe)
np
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi i know that this question doesnt belong here but eletrical engeneeing server is useless
Go for it
why $u_x=u_1\frac{\frac{R_1R_4}{R_4+R_2+R_1}}{R_3+\frac{R_1R_4}{R_4+R_2+R_1}}$ and not $u_x=u_1\frac{\frac{R_1(R_4+R_2)}{R_4+R_2+R_1}}{R_3+\frac{R_1(R_4+R_2)}{R_4+R_2+R_1}}$?
Slowaq
its voltage divider
u_-=u_+=0V
R_1 is parralel with (R_4 in series with R_2) if im correct
Ur second formula assumes R4 and R2 are in series
are they not?
The output of the op amp is an active node that sources or sinks current
You can't just assume it has 0 A entering it
wait shouldn't currents going into inverting and non inverting inputs be 0?
hm yes i see so then how should i express u_x?
Honestly I feel like using voltage dividers here might be a bit unintuitive
Instead apply KCL at u_x
No wait
Not at u_x but at u_-
$i_-=0A\implies i_{R_1}=i_{R_2}$
Slowaq
$i_{R_2}=\frac{u_O}{R_2}$ and $i_{R_1}=-\frac{u_x}{R_1}$
Slowaq
$u_O=-\frac{R_2}{R_1}u_x$
Slowaq
but i dont know u_x
Yeah so thats the next goal
So you want to try calculating uh
u_x/i_4 where i_4 is the current thru R4
Because u want to calculate the effective resistance R_4.eff from u_x's side
You would think that would just be R_4 but like
Its connected to u_o which is again an active node
wdym by this ? u_x/i_4
$\frac{u_1-u_x}{R_3}=-2\frac{u_O}{R_2}-\frac{u_O-u_x}{R_4}$
Slowaq
No lile
but i still dont get what will we get from this fraction
Its the effective resistance of R_4 looking from u_x
Because u r trying to use voltage division or whayever right
U r gonna have
,, u_x = u_1\4{R_{eq}}{R_{eq}+ R_3}
Where R_eq is the resistance of the entire circuit looking right of R_3
In turn, [
R_{\t{eq}} = R_1 \Vert R_{4.\t{eff.}}
]
I hope that makes some sense?
yup i think yes but i dont get wdym by R_4.eff. isnt this circuit supplied by DC voltage source? why do we then need to consider effective voltage?
Its because of the op amp
hm i havent came across this yet. how to we express it then?
Do you know Miller theorem
im afraid not
R_4.eff is basically sayjng
"What single resistor, if connected from u_x to ground, would draw the same current as the real R_4?"
so since $i_{R_4}=\frac{u_x-u_O}{R_4}=\frac{u_x}{R_{4.\mathrm{eff}}}$ thus $R_{4.\mathrm{eff}}=\frac{u_x R_4}{u_x-u_O}$?
Slowaq
Hol up im kinda confused what you did there
I mean yes your expression for i_4 is right
But i expected tou to use this
$i_{R_4}=\frac{u_x-u_O}{R_4}=\frac{u_x-\left(-\frac{R_2}{R_1}u_x\right)}{R_4}=\frac{u_x(R_1+R_2)}{R_1 R_4}$
Slowaq
$\frac{u_x}{i_4}=R_{4.\mathrm{eff}}=\frac{R_1R_4}{R_1+R_2}$
Slowaq
Yeah awesome
cool so now i have everything i need awesome
Thats basically the resistor you can connect from u_x to ground that draws the same current as R_4
Yep
The rest is algebra I guess
crazy thank you very much you saved me from a lot of headache
Its always good to do this bte
Like
Find the equivalent resistances of everything active like an op amp
yup i can see
anyway im gonna head out but i might spawn here with another circut problem hehe
bye
.close
Closed by @trail otter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Cya
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So, thanks to the common knowledge I was able to make 0,5 out of 1/2 ans 0,33 out of 1/3. But is there a more reliable way of solving these? Like if I were to do a (1/183)^-3
Well 0.33 = 1/3 isn't really true but I assume you missed a vinculum there
(1/x)^-b = x^b
Anyways
Also, is my solution technically inaccurate? Because 1/0,33 isn't really exactly 3, it's a bit more than 3
This
I highly suggest not getting decimals involved here
Lemme see
And what if it's for example (17/x)^-b
But yeah generally you'd want to keep everything in terms of fractions at this stage of mathematics
(y/x)^-b = (x/y)^b
So
1/(x/y) = y/x?
Yes
Thank you guys
Also, an idiot question here
I forgor how to turn 1/2 into 0,5 and vice versa š
long divide
1/2 -> 0.5 by division
0.5 -> 1/2 by multiplying by 10 to get 5/10 which in turn simplifies to 1/2
This is how i usually do these conversions in general
0,2837 Ć 1000 = 2837/10 000?
How do I divide 1 by 2 though?
2837/1000
Right
I can add a 0 and then divide by 10
https://youtu.be/do_IbHId2Os consider watching this
Here is the video mentioned about converting Base-10 fractions: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_jcW-ZgpRbM
Here is the video mentioned about decimal numbers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mst8iZjIpFE
And here is the video mentioned about comparing fractions: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KNdUJQ_qd4U
Here we learn th...
Are you sure? That's more than 1
Thanks
nps
Yeah but im a bit confused by what you are trying to do here. You multiplied by 1000 but proceeded to divide by 10000?
Oh wait 
Dont mind me i horribly misread
Yeah thats fine, your second expression
Closed by @lament salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that
$$ \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{ (n-1)! }{ n(x+1)ā¦(x+n) } = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{(x+k)^2}$$
IntoTheUnknowm
II donāt how how to begin this one
i'd use gamma function on the left expression
or possibly beta
because essentially (x+1)(x+2)...(x+n) IS Š(x+n+1)/Š(x+1)
and if x is a positive integer then the whole thing becomes (x+n)! / x!
But how would I proceed from there?
Well (n-1)! is just Š(n)
So the left becomes 1/n * $\frac{\Gamma(n)}{\frac{\Gamma(x+n+1)}{\Gamma(x+1)}}$

ill write Š as G for the meanwhile
idk if theres a latex for gamma function
$\gamma$
alex <3
,,\Gamma
ćÆć¼ćŖć¼
ah
Tbh I donāt know too much about gamma functionsā¦
alex <3
I don't see another easier way for solving it tho tbh
,tex >>textgradientglow<< $\frac{ Gamma(n) Gamma(x+1) }{ n Gamma(x+n+1) }$
ćÆć¼ćŖć¼
We havenāt learned much about them
and the right expression to me seems to be the series representation of trigamma function that's why i thought going with the gamma approach would be good
maybe try rewriting LHS as a difference of two terms
to get it to telescope
hmmm
What immediately stood out to me is that:
[
sum_{n=1}^{oo} frac{ (n-1)! }{ (x+1)...(x+n) } = frac 1x
]
ćÆć¼ćŖć¼
How? Sorry
It's a telescoping sum
textgradientglow<<[
sum_{n=1}^{oo} frac{ (n-1)! }{ (x+1)...(x+n) } = frac 1x <=> sum_{n=1}^{oo} frac{ n!x }{ n(x+1)...(x+n) }= 1
]
ćÆć¼ćŖć¼
I'm sorry for interrupting, but I just have to say that the latex rendering with textgradientglow looks incredible
So your left hand side is < 1/x, and we can write it as a telescoping sum. On the other hand, if we call it f(x), then f(x-1) - f(x) = 1/x^2. Should be obvious from there.
Thanks!
Iāll give it a try thank you
Thank you to you too!
.close
Closed by @unkempt delta
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need lots of help with trig derivitives
Missed a week of classes, havent done trig in a week
Im lowkey still struggling with highschool trig
,tex .unit circle
riemann
,tex .sohcahtoa
riemann
those are the two main tools. you'll need csc = 1/sin and sec = 1/cos and cot = 1/tan
Yea i got those down a bit
My teacher said the unit circle isnt really necessary if u know the basics
Sin30 = 1/2
this cheat sheet is really good for trig https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Extras/CheatSheets_Tables.aspx#TrigSheet
sure depends what you consider basics are
Just this
And sin60 is root3/2
Then cos is the inverse
And pi/3 is 60 etc
do you need help with any specific problems here?
no
Yea, how do u 1e?
what is cotangent?
you cropped out the number
Oh sorry
Its tan^2(2pi/3)
That one at the top
Ref angle would be pi/3
Which is tan(60)
Right
Idk where to go from
Here
you drew the triangle for 2pi/3, correct?
No i havent, lemme draw it
Ignore 1/2
I lowkey dont know if i ever solved this way
this is incorrect, think about 2pi/3 (or 120 degrees) in a unit circle
this tool might help https://www.mathsisfun.com/algebra/trig-interactive-unit-circle.html
Sine, Cosine and Tangent ... in a Circle or on a Graph. ... Sine, Cosine and Tangent (often shortened to sin, cos and tan) are each a ratio of sides of a right angled triangle
.
Wait am i looking for these fractions or what
remeber, cosine is the x coordinate, sine is the y coordinate
cosine is the base, sine is the height
Root 3/2 and 1/2
read the top right
yes, -1/2 to be specific
Oh
match the colors together
so what is tan(2pi/3) then?
yeah, so what about tan^2(2pi/3)?
yep
Ok got it
How would i do something like 2b, 2 being the 2nd set of questions
Cos = -1/root2
what is -1/sqrt(2)?
A was easy
can you simplify that?
then its again just applying from the unit circle
you could do it that way, or you could think about tan(theta) as the slope of the angle
Well i thought the -1 just meant like
what angles have a slope of -1?
Not sure tbh
look back to the unit circle
yeah, but which angles have lines with slope of -1?
3pi/4 and 7pi/4
Cool u can do that
Is that only with tan
The next question is csc=1
yeah, tangent is the slope of the angle, which is also why tangent of pi/2 and 3pi/2 are undefined
what is cosecant?
1/sin
that works, but you also dont have to draw an image to solve it
How would u do it this way?
csc = 1
-> 1/sin = 1
-> sin = 1
right?
Yea
then how do you solve?
yeah use unit circle knowledge
Imma try e
Cot = -root3
Idk what to do actually
Actually i got the answer from guessing 5pi/6 and 11pi/6 just cuz it made the most sense
But idk how u would solve it
one way is to know cot = 1/tan
then tan = -1/sqrt(3)
then you can think about it as which angles have lines with that slope
yeah, its very important to know the unit circle, definitions, and formulas in trigonometry
the cheat sheet i posted above has all of that which helps memorize these things
.
the rest is essentially just algebra
.close
Closed by @blazing cloak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do inverse cos no??
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if anyone here is good at ap stats i need you asap
please help in dms if possible
why not here?
idk id rather have streamline dms
to look back at easier
than in a channel w constant flow
Just save a link to the conversation
personally i always prefer to help people in help channels rather than dm so people can add things on or correct me
i think most people are the same
we prefer to keep conversation here due to moderation purposes as well
you will have control of this channel for as long as you're still actively working on the problem (up to 3 days i think)
-# (I'm pretty sure it's longer, pajamamallama had a channel going for two weeks at some point)
back in my day we had months long channels
until an evil man (riemann) came along
sorry that sounds meaner than i wanted it to
Now I want this lore
oh
i mean id really feel more comofrtable in dms
tbh
its fine ill ask the question
A survey is conducted ar a local high school to determine the effectiveness of school commhnication with students families who speak a language other than English at home. To collect data, the schools statistician plans to send a questionnaire home with students to ask for the parents opinion about the schools communication effectiveness. Which of the following sources of bias is apparent in the survey?
Wording effect
Non random sampling
Undercoverage
Nonresponse
Sampling error
What have you thought of so far?
under coverage or nonresponse
why? + define them
surely the trick to getting a 5 in ap stats cannot be to coinflip every question as undercoverage or nonresponse. justify how it could be one (or either). IMO there's a difference between the target demographic & the sampled group, which could lead to some type of error
yea
a little over a year ago there was a very long running and active help channel: #help-16 message
probably the most famous help channel ever, though i never worked in it so i could not tell you much about it
concurrently there was also this one:
#help-47 message
which is not as famous and wasn't as long running but it holds a special place in my heart because i loved the question so much and worked on it a lot in that channel
sadly one day they were both closed
@viral stream Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Smone held to a channel for a week in the not so distant past
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
f(1/2 x) = (abs(x))^3
f''(-1) =...?
-48
48
14
1
can someone solve this and tell me what they get? bc i keep getting 24.
By replacement property replace x by 2x in both LHS n RHS ull get f(x)=|2x|³
mhm
You should be showing your work
$f(\frac12x) = |x|^3$\
Find $f''(-1)$\
-48; 48; 14; 1
Sky
You only diff it once
You should diff twice
1/2 f'(1/2 x) = 3 (abs(x))^2 * (x/abs(x))
which is
1/2 f'(1/2 x) = 3 * abs(x) * x
second derivative
1/4 f''(1/2 x) = 3 * ( (x^2)/abs(x)) + abs(x) )
f''(1/2 x) = 12 ( (x^2)/abs(x))+ abs(x) )
subsituting x=-1
12 * (1/1 + 1)
12 * 2 = 24
but... i did differentiate twice
Oh, youāre using different approach
yeah i also tried this
got 12 (forgot to differentiate f'(1/2 x) properly... then 24...
but yeah both methods give me 24
How did you get 24 w the second approach?
Mind briefly explain?
I differentiated both sides w3ith respect to x
1/2 f'(1/2 x) is the derivaitve of f(1/2 x)
3 (abs(x))^2 * (x/abs(x)) is the derivative of (abs(x))^3 with chain rule
No, Iām referring to the second approach that emoji name suggested
Which is to find f(x) first
hi cutie
I set u = 1/2x
f(u) = ( abs(2u) )^3
then i differentaited both sides with respect to u.
how else would you go on about differentiating abs(2u)^3
Hereās my idea
go ahead
|ab| = |a| * |b|
You first find f(x), and diff it twice
We already know that f(x) = |2x|^3, and weāll looking for the differentiation at -1
Which is equivalent to diffing -8x^3
seems alright, although not very sure if youve reached the second derivative through the right means (the second derivative itself is correct however)
24 is correct..?
I got -48 
elaborate how you got rid of the.... wait is absolute value of x^3 replacable with that
but the problem is that you found f''(-1/2)
substituting -1 on both sides
...
Quick question
Do you know how to remove the abs of
$|-2x+7|$ if x>4?
Sky
actually no the second deriv is not right
give me a second.
or if you mean- in an equation, we can just square.
No squaring, just simplify it
|x|x with product
( |x| + x/|x| * x)
+-
blurpleās approach first as itās closer to your original attempt
idk what is this š
did i fuck up the product rule š
Well talk about that later, blurple first
this is correct
that simplifies into |x| + x^2/|x|
i have no clue how that simplified to $\frac{x^2}{|x| + |x|}$ though
I did not do this š
ok i did it again
using the same method
idk what went different this time
but
yeah i got 48
right
and its always positive since the function is concave upwards
lovely!
ty.
@magic junco what was your approach?
First of all we need to reach the common ground where you can remove abs if the information is sufficient
Can you simplify that again?
ok yeah i get what you mean now
if x=4 then its negative
if x=anything above 4
