#help-23
1 messages · Page 311 of 1
Here, x = 2 is a zero of multiplicity 9
See how zeros of even and odd multiplicites differ visually?
ohh alright
So we can construct f already
and how do i summarize it in one equation?
f(x) = (x-a)(x-b)(x-c). We have -1 of multiplicity 2, so we take for example a = b = -1.
Then f(x) = (x+1)^2(x - c)
Now we take c = 0.5, because that's the other zeor
So f(x) = (x+1)^2(x - 0.5)
thank you so much!! ur a life saver
Now there is one thing we might consider if we are very strict and careful
,w plot (x - 2)^2
,w plot (x - 2)^4
Those almost look the same, right?
yeah
So really, we would also argue that it's f(x) = (x +1)^2(x - 0.5) and not f(x) = (x + 1)^4(x - 0.5) (or any higher even exponent)
To do that, just pick some value
At x = 1, it looks like it's at -4
yeah
Or really, I guess 0 would be the easiest value
f(0) = 1^2(0 - 0.5) = -0.5
Well, but if we look at the graph, it's supposed to be 2 there!
So we notice that we actually need a factor too
Namely a factor of -4
So what we get is $f(x) = -4(x + 1)^2(x - 0.5)$
Kepe
Ok it's really small, wait a second
okok
Np
.close
Closed by @sly lintel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
(Regarding this, I don't think you need to further discuss it in your working, only if you want to be really really precise, which I really think is not necessary here)
okok got it, thanks :DD
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello so i was working on this problem earlier and I just wanted to make sure I understand the process correctly. The correct thing to do here is to set u=1+9x and then to find the new bounds I plug in the old bounds into my value for u.
@hollow stream Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @hollow stream
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to work out a
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
no
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this question badly worded or am I missing something
part (b), unsure what to do
ii took a second but otherwise its fine
ii: find the equation of the circle with center P, which passes through point T
but what is point T
there is a line joining the circles edge and P
said line is tangent to the circle C
T is where the line intersects the circle
its tangent?
ahh ‘touches the circle’
the wording threw me off
anyway cheers
.close
Closed by @opaque brook
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this right so far?
looks like you've assumed the thing is already true.
if you're proving by induction you probably want to be very careful about how you present it
base case, inductive hypothesis, then inductive step
@glossy mica Has your question been resolved?
so base case would be like... determining it's true for n=5 (because n=5 isn't shown)
inductive hypothesis would be the "p(k)" where i replace n with k
and then the inductive step is k+1?
@gusty trench
Base case: n=5
$1^2+2^2+3^2+4^2+5^2=((5(5+1))(2(5)+1))/6$
$55=55$
Inductive hypothesis:
$1^2+2^2+3^2+4^2+\cdots+k^2=\frac{k(k+1)(2k+1)}6$
AWACS Sky Eye
<@&286206848099549185>
i'm just stuck now.
@glossy mica Has your question been resolved?
just show that it’s true for n = 1, then assume it’s true for n = k and show that it must be true for n = k+1
Yeah it's the inductive hypothesis
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not sure where to start with part b
how about the hint
No, I think for a) you've done a lot of extra fluff. Linearly independent -> basis in R^2 is justification enough if you hvae that from class
the hint is definitely for part b)
To understand why the hint applies for part b), by the definition of basis the coordinates of w in a basis {x_1,x_2} are just a and b s.t. ax_1+bx_2=w
what is the notation on top of w?
cool squiggly line
lol yeah
I think what they mean is
w_1 with a squiggle
is the first coordinate of w in the basis
w_2 with a squiggle is the second coordinate of w in the basis
and w_1 and w_2 are just the coordinates in the standard basis
so
by "the basis" i mean {[1,2], [2,5]}
1 2 and 2 5
1 2 woudl be the first coordinate?
anything that is a linear combination of 1 2 and 2 5?
When you express w in that basis that means ur expressing it as some number of copies $\tilde{w_1}$ of $[1,2]$ + some number of copies $\tilde{w_2}$ of $[2,5]$, i.e. you're finding $\tilde{w_1}$ and $\tilde{w_2}$ such that $$[w_1,w_2]=\tilde{w_1} [1,2] + \tilde{w_2} [2,5]$$
well that hasnt worked has it
Damian
is that really what the question is asking?
Yeah! Then the final step is just to write that as a vector [\tilde{w_1},\tilde{w_2}]
isn't expressiong them in terms of eachother what i did in problem 1?
You're not expressing them in terms of each other
You're expressing some arbitrary vector
w
in terms of the both of them
okay
so just rewrite in terms of w1 and w2
easy
almost too easy i think
thanks though
close
just comes down to solving a linear system with some arbitrary constants so not too complex
@heavy venture Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me learn optimization I have a test tomorrow, and I don't understand any of this.
@open spade Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need some
@frail mountain Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i solve this problem
where do i start learning math
i've found an answer but i need to know how to solve it
multiplying the numerator and denominator by the conjugate
It comes by practicing. Solve lots and lots of examples
@covert gorge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I cant tell if im being stupid or not
is showing 4k + 3 not as a sum of squares super trivial
if its not ill keep trying and figure out something
What is the actual thing you are trying to prove
show that a square is either 0 or 1 mod 4
damn i was gonna use mod then convert it to a divisibility problem
oh you can stay with mod
ah
alright ill probably just change approach then
just out of curiousity
is showing 4 | x^2 + y^2 - 3 even possible?
without reverting back to modulo
you mean show it's false
like I said
modulo definition is made to make your life easier
there always is a way through 'divisibility'
since there is a way through mod and mod is defined using divisibility
ah okay i see
how did u get this idea so fast btw
my brain never even came pu with this thought
well apart from the fact that I already did this problem
oh 💀 idk did u ever struggle with stuff like this for ur first time because i certainly am 😃
showing that a sum of squares is never 4k+3 is the same as showing a sum of squares is always 0,1 or 2 mod 4
it is my first proof class outside of discrete so alot of these questions are killing me
ah
Totally normal
wait
im being dumb
0 and 1 are the only possible residues here
🤦♂️
bruh
is this just a bunch of cases
im goign to kms
😭
ok got it ty @obsidian oracle
.close
Closed by @tranquil geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ive tried so many answers but i cant seem to do it (polar coords calculus 2)
@vague pewter Has your question been resolved?
@vague pewter Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vague pewter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If they say that 0 isn’t an element of f([a,b]) how can f(x) be 0 then
Like obviously if the integral is zero f(x) could be 0 therefore the integral will still be 0
But they just said it can’t be 0
Looks like poor wording, yeah
lol
If a continuous function doesn't change the sign, then the integral is either strictly positive or strictly negative
Ok I think we can fix their statement
Let f be a continuous function such that f(x) >= 0 on [a, b]
Then we have this
Same for the case when f(x) <= 0 on [a, b]
This property states that if the integral of a continuous and sign-definite function over an interval [a,b] equals zero, then the function itself must be identically zero on that interval. Intuitively, for a continuous function that doesn’t change sign (either always non-negative or always non-positive) to have a zero integral, it would imply that the function has no "area" under its curve across the interval, hence f (x) = 0 for all x ∈ [a,b].
Closed by @knotty jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
actually if y=x^3 and we integrate it over -1,1 then it’ll be 0 too
But in this case y wasn’t 0
However x^3 is not sign-definite on [-1, 1]
Sign-definite continuous function f(x) on [a,b] integrates to zero if and only if f(x)=0 on [a,b]
like the only example is y=0 itself id think
Because if you have y=3 which means its sign indefinite because its always positive
The integral over a certain interval won’t be 0
So it literally only makes sense for y=0 but that seems like such a useless statement
Well, we're working with this statement
And it's useful, I assure you
For example in variational calculus that's one of the key steps in deriving the Euler-Lagrange equations
Let's prove it, actually
Let f(x) be a sign-definite function on [a, b]. Without loss of generality, we can just say f(x) >=0 on [a, b]
So we want to prove that for such $f(x)$ we have
$$\int_a^b f(x)dx = 0 \Leftrightarrow f(x)\equiv 0$$
Crazy
EQUENOS
Implication $\Leftarrow$ is obvious, right?
EQUENOS
Now let's prove $\Rightarrow$, using continuity of $f(x)$ and the fact that $f(x) \ge 0$ on $[a,b]$
EQUENOS
Suppose $f(x) > 0$ at some $x_0 \in [a,b]$. Then, due to continuity there exists $\delta > 0$ such that $f(x) > 0$ on $[x_0-\delta, x_0+delta]$. Hence
$$\int_a^b f(x)dx \ge \int_{x_0-\delta}^{x_0+\delta} f(x)dx > 0$$
EQUENOS
So the integral can't be zero for non-zero non-negative continuous functions
Closed by @knotty jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I would like some help for this question (specifically the one on the right).
@noble wing Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
You should label some coordinates on the curve like this
Oh I see thank you for letting me know
.close
Closed by @noble wing
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i am currently stuck at iii
i have was trying to prove that (1+iz)/(1-iz) = fifth root of unity://
then i selfcontradict myself by assuming z is purely real
💀 i have no idea how to proceed
well (1+iz)/(1-iz) is a fifth root of unity
it's just that z is not necessarily real
(1+iz)/(1-iz) = e^(itheta)
with the correct values of theta
(1+iz) = (1-iz)(e^(itheta))
isolate z
then z = ...
@mystic junco Has your question been resolved?
Hi please can anyone help me with this stats. I need help. The requirement is: I would like to know the potential number of staff (and that number as a percentage), who may have fingerprints eliminated from the total number of fingerprints taken in 2022 and 2023.
This is the stats
Have 33,509 staff as of Sept 2024
Approximately 19,000 fingerprints missing from staff
We only have 14,509 staff fingerprints on database
2022
Fingerprints collected: 19,775
Fingerprints identified to database: 163
Unidentified fingerprints on database: 12,023
2023
Fingerprints collected: 18,095
Fingerprints identified to PPE: 89
Unidentified fingerprints on database: 11,437
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to solve this
bprp tried an entirely different approach
idk if its a known approach
would appreciate if someone can name or explain this method
You know liate?
Let me try going through
@daring tundra Has your question been resolved?
@daring tundra Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How is this obtained
The derivative part (x-1)/x
derivative of ln(x) is 1/x
and the latter part cuz chain rule
its ln(x/(x-1)) in your question
Yes
Ok
Ah ok
1/x >> (x-1)/x
So we always do the log one and then multiply it with the normal derivative
And how did we get the -1/x^2-x
by simplyfying this
Closed by @royal vigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to do backprop manually like the derivatives etc
But I don't know exactly I'm doing it correct?
@frigid ocean Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why did I get marked wrong here? Is my Integral correct and just my solving was off?
@sinful stratus Has your question been resolved?
@sinful stratus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Due to an awareness campaign, the number of sedentary people in a city has been decreasing. It is estimated that, at the beginning of the campaign, 4 out of every 5 inhabitants were sedentary, and that this number has been decreasing by 10% per year. If this trend continues, after how many years from the beginning of the campaign will only 1 in every 5 people be sedentary? If necessary, use log 2 = 0.3 and log 3 = 0.48.
I don't even know where to start
@hollow yacht Has your question been resolved?
so at first it was 4/5 = 80%, then it decreases 10% a year, a decrease of 10% is the same as multiplying by 90%, so if we were to make a formula for what's that number after X amount of years we could do: $f(x) = (4/5) \cdot \underbrace{90% \cdot 90% \cdots 90%}_{\text{x number of 90 percents}} = (4/5) \cdot (90%)^x$
Sires
ok so we wish to know for what x(the number of years) will that function be equal to 1/5
so let's just plug that number in:
$$
1/5 = (4/5) \cdot (90%)^x = (4/5) \cdot(9/10)^x
$$
$$
\Rightarrow 1/4 = (9/10)^x
$$
Sires
so now we have this exponential equation to solve, the way you do that is using logarithms since they turn exponentials into multiplications
let's apply the base 10 log on both sides
$$
\log (1/4) = \log (9/10)^x = x \log(9/10)
$$
$$
\Rightarrow x = \frac{\log(1/4)}{\log(9/10)}
$$
Sires
so we just need to calculate those logarithms, we can do that using a bunch of properties they have(log of 1/x is -log of x, log of x^y is y log of x, etc...)
Why is it 1/4?
I divided both sides by 4/5
the 5 cancels out and the 4 goes there dividing
oh ok
$$
x = \frac{\log(1/4)}{\log(9/10)} = \frac{-\log(4)}{\log(9) - \log(10)} = \frac{-\log 2^2}{\log 9^2 - 1} = \frac{-2 \log 2}{2 \log 3 - 1}
$$
Sires
and now we can use the values provided by the question
$$
= \frac{-2 \cdot 0.3}{2 \cdot 0.48 - 1} = \frac{-0.6}{0.96 - 1} = \frac{-0.6}{-0.04} = \frac{60} 4 = 15
$$
Sires
so yeah, we found x, its gonna shrink to 1/5 in 15 years
Why did log(9) - log(10) turn into log 9^2 - 1?
okk
because it is, just practice and it will come naturally
I tried, but I suck at log
keep in mind all those properties and you're good to go
I can't see those things
Its a matter of knowing the log properties by heart and knowing what log means
what does logarithm actually mean?
It's like log b = c, then 10^c = b, no? Something like that
yeah
it asks the question "What power of my base(in this case 10) equals that number?"
so say I know log 3, I know what power of 10 equals 3
if I need to know 9, you see its 3², then what power of 10 will equal 3²? its gonna be whatever the last one was but times 2
$$10^{2\log 3} = (10^{log 3})^2 = 3^2 = 9$$
Sires
tbh the way I remember those things(other than just endless practice) is thinking the logarithms turns operations down a notch: exponentiation becomes multiplication, multiplication becomes addition
similarly, radiciation(idk if thats the word) becomes division, division becomes subtraction
Yeah
I can remember the properties of log, but I just can't have that "vision" of when to "decompose" (I don't know if that's the word, I'm using the translator) the numbers
the question gave you the log of 3 and log of 2, so ideally you want to decompose it all down to log 3 and log 2, you see 9 and 4 which are 3² and 2²
if it gave you log 5 you'd probably want to decompose into that
Closed by @hollow yacht
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the smallest possible number c such that for big enough n, [ \int_{\pi}^{n\pi} \frac{\sin x}{ x} , dx < c.]
bigpufik
@brazen helm Has your question been resolved?
@brazen helm Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @brazen helm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
We draw a 2024 × 2024 grid of unit squares. We call the vertices of the unit squares in the
grid lattice points; there are 2025^2 of these in our grid. Someone chose 10 of these lattice
points, and drew all the line segments that connect any two of them. Show that at least
one of these drawn line segments will contain at least two more lattice points besides its end
points.
Use the formula: for any two points (a,b) and (c,d), the number of lattice points INCLUDING THE ENDPOINTS is: gcd(a-c,b-d) +1
@willow jungle Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185> is this the right ping?
<@&286206848099549185> if so pls help me thx :D
Yes
So whats going on
Damn probability
prove that when you connect all points to each other that at least one segment has 2 lattice points excluding endpoints
not probability its pigeonhole principle
Oooooh
and sort of number parity
Okay
yeah
btw 2024 by 2024 points doesnt matter at all
just pretend that its an infinite griid
Yes aight
k
here's a very helpful property: for any two points (a,b) and (c,d), the number of lattice points INCLUDING THE ENDPOINTS is: gcd(a-c,b-d) +1
Okay i got an idea
Lets list a variable that explain the mouvement of the lattices
t between 0 and 1
put (x,y)=((1-t)x1+x2t,(1-t)y1+ty2)
mhm
yeah
Then we have d|both of var x and b
Var y
Var x=d.a and y=d.b
So if d>1
It finished
We already prove it
We need only to work on d=1
alr
my teacher half showed me how to do it
it involves parity with 3x
let 0,0 be (3x,3y)
Yes
0,1 = (3x,3y+1)
so on
we need gcd(a-c,b-d) to be 3 or greater
since gcd + 1 >= 4 right?
gcd >= 3
4 because we count two endpoints and 2 extra points on the line
so our proof is this: Prove that if we have ten points and we connect all of them to another point (45 total line) gcd(a-c,b-d)>=3
where a,b and c,d are points
Here we dont have grades
We have prepa system
So u can say thats my third year in engineering
damn
Hhhhhhhhhhhh yes difference type of studying
lol
Were focusing now only on topology and analyse
Yeah
I donot play for like 2 years but u can say appro 1700elo
My name in chesscom is
Micheallordzada
Ooh thats cool
well its blitz
Ur good for ur age tho
Hmmm wanna play ?
sure bullet mayb
U have fide id?
I got 1900 in elo in my fide id hhh i was playing tournaments but i got nerfed
dammmmmmnn
Nice i like uscf matches
Im a french guy hh i have fide and national par elo
k
Which is an intertournaments but ill try when im free
cool
To make it to usa hh
k
k
<@&286206848099549185>
Hmmm maybe profs?
yeah sure
Like doctorate guy is good
who?
maybe since ur already a helper you could help me reach him?
cuz ive asked this question on this discord server multiple times and nobody has solveed it
?
Hmmmm
Listen
This question needs to be answered as ur level
meaning?
I was going to do it with variation but no way ur gonna understand this
Derivative and terrorying
U understand derivative?
In this question
I need u to try to imagine
There is between the distance of two lattice
yeah this question involves parity and pigeonhole
im 100% sure
that you dont need deririvatives
to solve it
A really quiet distance so u gotta need to make the division between tiroir 1 and tiroir two diffrent than one
Cause they are different it cannot have 1 in pgcd
It need to be 2 or idk how
Cause if it one then the distance is not prime and the division will say that we have diffrent tiroirs
We need to catch 1 to apply it into the announcement
k
yes
It’s impossible to arrange 10 lattice points in such a way that all 45 segments connecting pairs of points would have
d = 1
d=1 (which would mean no internal lattice points), due to the density and distribution of lattice points
By what u called pingeonshole
U got it?
Thus
mhm
The PP at least one of the segments must have
d>1
d>1 meaning it contains at least one additional lattice point along the segment excluding endpoints
yes
Yes it quiet easy
could you help me with that cuz i 75% understood what u said
Okay what u need
Hmmmmm
Okay listen
Mathematically
A lattice point is a point in the plane with integer coordinates such as (x,y)
Right?
yes
When we pick any two lattice points and connect them
the line segment between them will have integer endpoints
duh
U got it?
yes
We want to prove that at least one of these segments will contain another lattice point along the segment not counting the endpoints
Yes thats what it mean contain another lattice
Its 1+1=2
Hhhh
Like a hole contain 1
Will contain extra one
its 4 total
Yes
we need one to have at least 4 total lattice points
2+2
Now if u understand what next its great
If we connect two lattice points, say we can describe any point on the line segment AB using the parameter t where 0<t<1
And A (x1,y1) , B(x1,y1)
Thus
(x,y)=((1-t)x1+x2t,(1-t)y1+y2t)
Its describe the mouvement
hmmmm
my teacher gave me a different way to solve it
Show me
so remember that we need to prove that gcd(a-c,b-d)>=3
for at least 1 out of the 45 line segments
if you dont remmeber i can show you why
oh yeah lets get another person to help us
<@&286206848099549185>
SOMEONE HELP USSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS HElPERS PlS
<@&286206848099549185>
@willow jungle Has your question been resolved?
@willow jungle Has your question been resolved?
@willow jungle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can we use the weight function stuff to prove it?
The question is to prove this equation
||u = (2n - 1)pi - x||
Closed by @modern bloom
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im sorry that this probably isnt the right channel for this, but im not sure where else. Are higher order differential equations more accurate in general for modeling systems or do they just allow for more complex systems?
.close
Closed by @onyx narwhal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.
Show that: $\cos ^{2}75\degree = \frac{2-\sqrt{ 3 }}{4}$
Amir
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Could you not just use compound angle formula?
Wdym
This triangle also makes it pretty simple, cos75 equals 1 over root (8+4root3). Square that and rationalise the roots and you should get the answer
@safe cypress Has your question been resolved?
This is as far as I got
and then i dont know how to simplify it more
I was thinking, dont simplify it
Just square it
And formulate an equation with the other value
Then show that both sides are equal
like 1/(8+4√3) = (2-√3)/4
Something like that
Closed by @safe cypress
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could i have some help understanding the division of an expresion by another expresion when it comes to quadratics, i have a worked example here relating to the conjugate root therom done by my teacher but it doesnt make any sense to me, help would be appriciated 😭
u want to understand how to carry out the division?
yeah 😭 😭 😭
it sounds so silly im sorry
i just wanted to understand how my teacher does it with short division
i havent had to divide polynomial expressions since aos 1 of methods
could you help me with that please and thank you🙏
by short division do u mean the thing on the paper?
yess
okay so u write the expression z^4 - 4z^3 + 7z^2 - 4z + 6
this is what u want to divide
u want to divide it by z^2 + 1
mhm
which would be z^2??
yeah
write that on top
now multiply what u just wrote on the top by z^2 + 1
and write it below
z^2 * (z^2 + 1) = z^4 + z^2
z^4+z^2
-4z^3+6z^2-4z+6???
yes
yay
now repeat using this
keep going until u can no longer divide
so for example z^3 / z^2 is okay, and ull get z
z^2 / z^2 is also okay and u get 1
but z / z^2 is not okay, this is when u must stop
get it?
so either that, or u stop when it becomes 0
like stop as soon as the degree of the thing u r dividing is less than the degree of the divisor (which in ur case is z^2 + 1, so stop as soon as the degree becomes 1 or less)
mmmmm
okay
okay okay yeah i see how it works now
just like another side not
i look at what we were being taught in aos 1 with polynomials and we were using some methods/theorums instead of just doing division like that
ill pop the theorums up but would you recomend doing division like that or using the theorums
remainder and factor theorums
the remainder and factor theorems are useful when u r trying to find linear factors
hmm so because we are working with quadratic factors then division is better?
u cud say that yes. coz i dont know of any other way to divide something by an expression of degree 2 or more
it seems to be that
im looking at the rest of the lesson and all the questions say to use long division
here i think it is a lianr factor though right
since its just z-2
so its just the paramaters of the question enforcing long division there ig??
sorry if i have a bunch of typos and wrong lingo, im really tired😭
yeah. like u can use the remainder and factor theorems to see if something is a factor or not. and "guess" factors. but if u want to find the quotient upon dividing an expression by a linear factor, ull still need long division ig...u can like try to be a little "clever" in some cases
like so u know z - 2 is a factor
so u want (z - 2)( something of degree 2 ) = z^3 + 2z^2 - 3z - 10
something of degree must have a z^2 in order that it forms z^3
and it must have a constant of +5 in order that it forms -10
so its (z - 2)(z^2 + z term + 5)
now a z term results from 5z - 2*(z term), and u want that to be -3z, so u can find the z term
in any case, division always works
when in doubt use that ig..
i think for this we had a formula like (z-2)(az^2 + bz + c) and then you like equate coefficients
yeah thats the same thing im doing but u dont really need to write all that out
i mean u might need to if its an exam
and it requires u to
but this is kinda how u cud do it quickly if the actual steps of factorization don't matter to ur answer
cool cool cool, yeah, i think the factor and remainder theorums would come in more in methods since thats where i learnt it
but im doing specalists as well and there its more about the aplications of like complex numbers or tig functions or whatever
probably why my specalists teacher uses long division so much 💀
i hated the guess and check aspect when it came to factors of polynomials, especially since theres like more sure ways it ig 😭
i feel like i sound dumb oml, (i have exams in a week im so cooked), thanks for the help though this really helped me understand 🙏
hope u do well on ur exams 🙂
thanksss, its only units 1 and 2 for most of my subjects so as long i just dont miss the whole exam i can just lock in next year
sorry i dragged this out so much, do i just close now 😭
.close
Closed by @paper mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys
for my math exam i had this question
5^(x+1) = 15 what is value of 5^(x-1)
i got 5 x 5^x = 15
5^x = 3
and then 5^x x 5^-1
= 3 x 5^-1
= 3/5
but when i plug 5^(3/5) back in
i dont get 3
btw logs are not in my course yet
we do next year
I was about to say
how did you do this
i checked it when i got home
i hate the test makers
):
5^x = 3
ghnfewoihjgewgfew
5^x = 3 so 5^(x-1) = (5^x)/5 = 3/5
@brazen parrot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me solve these please will send photos
they are supposed to be done by yourself...if there is some particular thing that you cannot figure out, we can help with it
Oh
I tell you this as the problems seem very different from each other
it is like you've just posted here the work that was given to you without even trying
Yes it’s like our practice test for school that we get
@sweet nexus
the objective of the help channel is to help you solve problems that you got stuck in while solving it or help you check your work.
when posting you should send what indicates that you did try a little in the problem.
Even if you posted we will not answer your question immediatly, we are going to help you get to the correct answers by giving you directions, explinations, or hints till you reach to the answer by yourself.
Oh ok
That is kinda the basics of learning. you learn from the channel to be able to solve other related problems
So if I go try to solve them all I can come back with the ones I had problems with?
yes
and post one at a time,
check #❓how-to-get-help for more information
close the channel and open a new one when you want to ask
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @sweet nexus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me
@desert pewter Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In an abelian grp, if $H,N \le G$, then $HN \le G$ and has order $\frac{|H||N|}{|H\cap N|}$
somethingwrong
Is the statement about the order true? and any hints on how to prove it?
by "<=" you mean "subset"?
subgrp
ok
well find a group morphism
to apply isomorphism theorem
not necessarily kernel equal to what you deleted, only isomorphic to it
reminder: cartesian product of groups is a group with its induced operation
Let $\phi: H\times N \rightarrow NH$ be defined by $\phi(h,n)=h+n$. We then show that this is a surjective homomorphism(omitted). If $\phi(h,n)=0$, then $h+n=0$. This implies that $h$ is the inverse of $-n$ and thus $h\in N$. By symmetry we get that $n \in H$ and thus $n,h \in H \cap N$
somethingwrong
hm im not sure how to proceed from here, to show that the kernel is isomorphic to H \cap N
oh wait
The above would mean that $\phi(h,n)=0$ implies $(h,n)=(h,-h)$ where $h\in H \cap N$
somethingwrong
yes
Then right now we have that $\ker(\phi)\subseteq {(h,-h): h \in H\cap N}$
somethingwrong
the other direction should be very straightforward and then it is easy to see that the RHS Is isomorphic to H\cap N
first isomorphism theorem then gives us the result at the very very top right?
yes
Closed by @whole forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi im currently stuck at the cos(ktheta) part 💀
first part ive shown by using geometric series.
then the second part i attempted
my idea is to find the real part of the right side only.-.
yet i have no idea how to deal with the denominator of the right side
🫠
That's a good idea
To deal with denominator just use that fact that $\frac{1}{x+iy} = \frac{x-iy}{(x+iy)(x-iy)} = \frac{x-iy}{x^2 + y^2}$
EQUENOS
Closed by @mystic junco
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My brain isn't working properly rn can someone help with this question on coordinate geometry of the line?
Idk how they get the coordinates when it doesn't have numbers on the chart
@fading lodge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For every natural n, this expression is real. True or false
With demonstration
Please I’m stuck with it I can’t continue
You can use DeMoivre and the definition of sin(x) in terms of complex exponentiels
@mighty haven Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys how do i solve this implicit derivatives
i just applied a small change on both sides!
sure! Where are you lost?
why arent we using y prime?
well, right!
we can do that too
i just thought youd be more comfortable with the eroor and approximation process
alright, lets derive it!
thats the thing im stuck on
the step after this
alright
here
any misclarifications?
well
And do you know the partial derivative rule?
this thing
you can use this too!
ermmm i havent taken that
i have the solving
but
idk why we wrote the highlighted part instead of writing 4y’+3y^2 y’
because of product rule
yeah
(y)d(4x)/dx+4xd(y)/dx
i feel like i get it
but im still confused a bit
i dont get the concept ill try solving another question
@graceful pike Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @graceful pike
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
What’s the original question
Solve the equation
presumably, that is the original question
That is?
Yes
Solve for x?
Yes
Can u once type it out for me
|-2x-5| - |-3x| = -5
so do I rewrite it as 2x - 3x = -5 - 5?
The question says there are 2 x values 🤔
Be very careful with absolute value equations
the absolute value of something is always positive, but that doesnt imply whats between the absolute value lines is positive
| -3 | = 3
| 3 | = 3
(on that note, are you aware of the piecewise definition of the absolute value function?)
|x-3| = 1
solution 1: x-3=1
x = 4
solution 2: x-3=-1
x = 2
This is how I solved previous question
In this case, you're doing something similar - to make things a bit easier, I'm gonna rewrite it as |2x + 5| - |3x| = -5
x if x > 0
-x if x<=0
Then you wanna consider the cases where
- both 2x + 5 and 3x are positive (so when x >= 0),
- when 3x is negative but 2x + 5 is positive (so when x is between -5/2 and 0), and
- where both 2x + 5 and 3x are negative (so x <= -5/2)
In each of those cases, you can then rewrite the absolute value equation using this, and then solve (and check the values you find correspond to the interval you should be in, e.g. if you take the first case, you shouldn't get something like -43 as a solution)
I don't understand how I am supposed to use it, can you show example?
E.g. for the first case, you know that |2x + 5| = 2x + 5 and |3x| = 3x, so put those into the equation and (try to) solve (2x + 5) - (3x) = -5: do you get a solution x that's nonnegative?
Second case is solving (2x + 5) - (-3x) = -5 and checking if any solution you find is between -5/2 and 0, third is solving -(2x + 5) - (-3x) = -5 and checking if the solution you find is at most -5/2
@brittle storm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, here is the problem for context
this is solution for 1
and here is solution to 3. where i don't understand what is going on.
so first of all, i think there is a missing negative sign in the result of dy
then they are substituting the dy in the first differential. but i don't get why some stuff becomes 0
the thing i've underlined
the way i think about solving it is
partial dw/dx is
= ze^y +zxe^y dy/dx +e^z + e^z dy/dx
(zxe^y + e^z ) dy/dx + ze^y + e^z
and for the constraint function if i use chain rule i get
(x^2 +2xy)dy/dx + 2xy + y^2 = 0
dy/dx = -(2xy + y^2) / (x^2 +2xy)
is it because z is a constant? but why they set it = 0 ?
@junior smelt thanks for the help
@mystic vale Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@mystic vale Has your question been resolved?
going to sleep, if anyone can help out understanding why they seem to set z=0 ping me please so I'll see it tomorrow
@mystic vale Has your question been resolved?
@mystic vale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me understand the inequality, specifically where the -1 in the denom come from in the ans key?
Basically one way to look at it is, you can increase a fraction by making the denominator smaller, e.g z²-1 is smaller than z²+1
Ohh I see, would the statement hold if I just get rid of the 1? like z^2-1 smaller than z^2?
z^2+1 > z^2 > z^2 -1
Closed by @soft halo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.(reverse triangle inequality for the "smaller denom bigger fraction", as those are complex numbers)
sorry how to apply that here? I googled reverse triangle inequality and it's a difference term
.reopen
✅
After you're done with him can i get some help then please?
Please do not advertise your help channel or thread in other parts of the server. There are many people who need help, so advertising can quickly turn into spam.
Reverse triangle inequality says $\abs{\abs{z} - \abs{w}} \leq \abs{z + w}$, if you've seen it, so that implies $\frac1{\abs{\abs{z} - \abs{w}}} \geq \frac1{\abs{z + w}}$ (provided no dividing by zero etc)
@junior smelt
In this case, replace z with z^2 and w with 1 (and on C, you have |z| = 5, so you know |z^2| = |z|^2 = 25 and the "included absolute value" is positive)
(and they are, you could e.g. replace b with -b and then you get the form I stated)
I see, that makes more sense. Thank you so much

If you're happy you can close the channel again if you want
(reopened it so it didn't get locked/recycled)
Closed by @soft halo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
gmdn
