#help-23
1 messages · Page 294 of 1
OH
wait is this derivatives? we haven't learn that yet
@junior sundial Has your question been resolved?
do you know what a^3 - b^3 is
uh the differences of cubes? yeah
@junior sundial Has your question been resolved?
denominator? you mean the x?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i just started calculus, how do you graph this guys
Do you know how to draw linear functions in the first place?
yeah
Now g(x) is just
a variety of linear functions
just at different intervals
draw 2x-3 from left until x = 0
then between x = 0 and x = 2 you draw -x-3
and from x = 2 to right 3x
ohh ok tyy
yeah i do
or at least it's something that you can use for orientation
@fallen blaze Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fallen blaze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
is that the work you did?
yeah, the solution below is from mine
and I don't know what to do next
I can't think of any ways
help
Have you learned exact differential equations
I'm still not good at it, I'm stuck with simplifying (I'm also not good at it)
should I divide by y?
please
@lean basin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@real turtle Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@real turtle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@junior smelt Idk my final answer seems a little too simple?
For the integral?
i need help please please please dm me
Ye
I mean (of course assuming n is a nonzero integer) the integral does end up working out like that (see the wolfram evaluation)
So was my I final answer for the definite integral correct
Cuz I also have to get the integral from 0 to +pi
But sine is then multiplied by (-t+pi)
Yep, it was fine 
So does that mean my entire value for Bn would be 0?
Because for the function from 0-pi is -pi/n
i told you yesterday that even functions have bn=0
and odd functions have an=0
so yes, bn=0
for a repeated triangular gate function
+pi/n
@valid geyser Has your question been resolved?
@valid geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In how many points the following function intersects with the x axis
Yeah then pls explain what the question tells to do also pls
I need to simplify it, graph it and then "In how many points the following function intersects with the x axis"
Ah ok
i guess we would write this equation in terms of cos only
so i guess we use some trig formula to change sinx/2 with cos
do you know such formula?
I have tried that
You know the double angle formula right?
I was thinking of this, but I would need to have just x or just x/2 maybe idk
yes
I have tried the common ones
but idk how to get a simple expression with one sine or cosine to graph it like I was taught
I tried this: write cos2x as 1-2sin²x, then sin²x can be written as (2sin(x/2)cos(x/2))^2
When you will put this in place of cos2x, you will get your equation turned into terms of sin²(x/2) and cos²(x/2)
You can change cos²(x/2) to yk (1-sin²(x/2))
Then you have your whole eqn in sin(x/2)
y = Asin(Bx + C) + D

mm idk
do you get 16sen^2 (x/2) - 16sen^4(x/2) + sen(x/2) - 2 ?
Wait a min , what's it equal to ?
Ah = 0
Yes
No see it has asked number of times f(x) cuts x axis , that basically means that number of value of x for which f(x) = 0
Nah it might be that only 3 or 2 or 1 , r u allowed to use calculators?
just the basic ones I think
bc I am actually supposed to graph
it
y = Asin(Bx + C) + D
Oo
I think
The exercises of this kind I had to graph it to get the answer
so idk
Isn't it going to be hard to graph this .....
Wait let me try
m okay
Yeah you can use trigonometry formulas to simplify it
Which ones ....?
let me see
What is the question
So in other words how many zeros does the function have for that range
Yes
We got to this expression
What happens when sin(x/2)=2cos2x
we get 0
Answer is 1
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
Ok dm me
but the thing is that having the answer doesn't tell you much
Ok let me try
bc I still need to now how to solve it
like the process
it's what's important
we get sm similar to what we did before
Okay
0 = 16sen^2 (x/2) - 16sen^4(x/2) + sen(x/2) - 2
Ah, I think I know how, perhaps I need to graph each one
Quadratic
and then see the intersections
I thought graphs aren't allowed
,w plot sin(x/2)-2cos2x
.close
Closed by @quartz shore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm not sure how it went from sin(bt) to sin(u)1/b du
i subsituted with b and c for the prior equations outside of the integral to make it easier for me
Unless ive understood your question wrong i think thats just how u subs work
could you elaborate further what you mean?
if you look at the screenshot where it explains it, i'm not sure how exactly it goes from sin(bt)dt) to sin(u) 1/b du
well like i said you do a u sub
youget a new variable u and let it equal bt
you take the derivative of both sides to get that
du = bdt
so dt = 1/b * du
so sin(bt)dt becomes sin(u) 1/b du
so whatever is inside sin we use?
yeah whatevers most convenient
@real crater Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @real crater
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hii i know this is a bit silly but my cousin got assigned this homework and i have been helping her but the program doesn't recognise it as correct.
genuinely this is year 2 maths but I think i'm going mad because it literally won't recognise my solution as valid.
Uhh from what I see here the solution should be from 8 to 12 so if you got that the system is wrong
i did get that :/
It's possible that the system has the wrong solution put in
surely the teacher would check
thats very true I will email her
@olive leaf Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i just need to know if i did it right
How did you conclude in a that there are no solutions for x-intercepts?
tbh i dont really remember just says on my note that if i can simplify it even more then there is no solution
You can get two cases
That either x+1 = 3 or x+1 = -3
There would be no solutions if it was -3 because absolute values can take only positive values
ohh okay okay i didnt really understood my notes
i get it now
i thought its because i cant simplify it even more
so my x-int would be x+1 = - 3 and x+1 = 3
Yeah
how would i write it?
Your domain is good but check the range again
It should be 6 to -inf
ohh yeah
And it shouldn't be included
It's a debated topic should it or not but like better not
i would include it just incase
my professor taught us that it would be better to include it
thank you so much
.close
Closed by @raven dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
last question, im pretty sure i got it right, but just making sure
You can write it in wolfram alpha to check the answers
You can check the brackets with it too
Closed by @raven dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So I was wondering if I was doing this right
We set up systems of equations for the flow of traffic and then create an augmented matrix of the system of equation
make it into RREF
and then solve for each vector
but what im confused about is the realistic range of solutions
x1 is easy since that is just 0 <= x1 <= 200
I also said that 0 <= x2 <= 600
but technically x3 can have flow from x2 but im not sure what the range should be
@pliant zephyr Has your question been resolved?
@raven vessel
@pliant zephyr Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
that's exactly what I was going to ask you XD
I think the "22" is the given angle of 22 degrees, and the others are just labels
@loud dune Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
I'm desperate so I'll try asking here, because I believe it's more related to calculus than physics concept
've wasted about 5h trying to solve this.
Besides the method I'm trying (for learning purposes) I've calculated by using the area of the triangle (bh)/2 multiplied by the area of the trapezoid. ((B + b)h)/2 which resulted in 1.5J.
What am I doing wrong that I don't get the same result with integrals?
've wasted about 5h trying to solve this.
Besides the method I'm trying (for learning purposes) I've calculated by using the area of the triangle (bh)/2 multiplied by the area of the trapezoid. ((B + b)h)/2 which resulted in 1.5J.
What am I doing wrong that I don't get the same result with integrals?
@lament cobalt Has your question been resolved?
@lament cobalt Has your question been resolved?
@lament cobalt Has your question been resolved?
@lament cobalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Commands:
- clopen:
.close,.reopen - consensus:
.poll - factoids:
.tag - help:
.help - version:
.version
Type .help <command name> for more info on a command.
No command called "<open>" found.
No command called "open" found.
If f(x)= x^4+6, g(x) = x-2, h(x) = sqrt(x), then (f x g(h(x)) =
Closed by @ocean jewel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the sum of the first 8 terms of a geometric series is 200. the first term is 5.75 how do i find the ratio
basically im using the formula a(1-r^8)/(1-r)
but i dont know how to solve from there
Are you allowed to use some computer algebra system to solve an equation? Because thats what it comes down to, as I understand it
@haughty lodge Has your question been resolved?
nope
First step: Set up an equation. In the formula described, you know the value of "a"
so what is the equation you have?
equals
gautamdb
yes sure
yeah
oh yes that will help
yes
ok let me do that rq
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
okay, and that is also the farthest I could get by hand 🙂
lmaoo alr
tbh i have an idea
what about using the formula for a geometric sequence
hmm nvm wouldn't work
Are you sure you're not allowed to use wolframalpha or sth?
well the question doesn't specify
im pretty sure my teacher just gets these online
I guess you cannot simplify this further
lemme try use
wolframalpha
and see
cause the marking scheme has the answer but
no way of solving
I may be wrong, but I don't think there is an easy way to solve this. This is a 7th degree polynomial
,w 5.75 r^8 - 200 r +194.25 = 0
yeah
that's what
the marking scheme has
the second real solution is the one given by the marking scheme
yeah you should use the second equation you got
,w 34.7826087 = (1+r^4) (1+r^2) (1+r)
Closed by @haughty lodge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just want to clarify if I’m right or wrong.
I have been trying to gauge a scenario to contradict this. One where we have a continous function in its absolute value form, but when we revert its not continuous anymore.
you can consider piecewise functions
@void cosmos Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, so I did this problem and got only one solution for x, when I put it into my calculator I got more. What am I missing?
@mental mauve Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> Excuse the ping but it says I can after 15mins lol
have u learnt the graph of sin(x) yet?
Yes
Yeah but the question stated a domain
Ok
Yeah
yeah
yeah
with sin(x)=1 between 0 and 2pi we get one solution right
now that u changed the period we will get more solutions between the period
So where in my working did that not give me more than one answer?
Idk what arcsin means
oh gotcha
Wait, why plus or minus?
if u look at a normal graph sin(x) the sin(x)=1 at pi/2, pi/2 plus 2pi, pi/2 plus 4pi and so on
I understand that if I were to graph it I'd see the other solutions, however, I'm not sure why it isn't showing in my working
i’m about to get home i’ll write it out
Thank you and no rush lol, I do appreciate your help tho
Where did the pi/2+2kpi come from?
its called the general solution
it tells u all the possible x values where the graph will equal 1
k is an integer so counting number, 0,1,2,…
sub in different value of k and u get the x solutions
So how does the domain limit it?
Bcs if it isn't I'll get infinite solutions again?
yes
the domain basically limits the value of your graph to the lower limit the left value and upper limit the right value
Oh I see what you did
yeah
You did like the first couple of numbers and selcted the ones that fit into the domain
yeah
at the start u might need to write a few of them out until u can just tell straight away
it better to have more solutions then cross them out because they aren’t the domain then to have too little
Alright, thank you for your help and patience.
I can definitely do all that
Yeah
Anyway, thanks I've got other problems to do 🙂
.close
all good cya
Closed by @mental mauve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Posted this yesterday but couldn't get any help
(if it seems familiar it's cuz some guy posted it before)
Well, the thing is: I'm fairly sure there exist no such two lines, but it'd be pretty weird for the exercise to have no solution
The second and the third condition state that L, L1 and L2 are all parallel between themselves, thus it then follows that their vectors have the same direction
But the first condition states that L1 is contained within the first plane, which only happens if v(L1) is perpendicular to n(π1) and that L2 is contained in the second plane
If the vectors of L,L1 and L2 are all the same, then The same vector must be contained in both planes, thus v(L) should be perpendicular to n(π1) and n(π2), in other words, it should be their cross product
But when I did the cross product of those two vectors the result didn't have the same direction as v(L)
Oh, in case it is not clear, v(L) is the vector whose direction is that of the line L, while n(π) is the vector normal to a plane π
i mean you can find the direction vector for L1 and L2
which would just be (1,3,2)x(-3,-1,3)
,w (1,3,2)x(-3,-1,3)
that'll give you the direction vector for L1 and L2
Thing is, if that was the direction vector, the lines wouldn't be parallel to L
they're definitely not meant to be parallel to L lol
That direction vector is.not proportional to (2,0,1)
Third condition
if L1 were parallel to L, then they wouldn't intersect
so L1 intersect L = empty set
unless we're including the point at infinity
Doubt we're working with the extended real numbers
(The third condition only says that the line L meets the other two lines, not that they need to be parallel)
The third condition states that the set of intersections of L and L1/2 is an empty set
Don't get how that could mean the lines meet
is not the empty set
Ain't no way, it was not equal
Oh my god, guess it's what I get for attempting it half asleep
My bad, god am I stupid
Thanks
.close
Closed by @glacial meadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the number of bacteria in a culture increases by the same percentage every hour. The number doubles in 10 hours. By what percentage does the number increase in 2 hours?
,calc (1.11)(1.11)(1.11)(1.11)(1.11)
Result:
1.6850581551
yeah more then 11 but whats the number
@wild island Has your question been resolved?
,w fifth root of 2
it doubles in 5*2 hours
so
you're looking for an increase a
such that a*a*a*a*a = 2
that's exactly the fifth root of 2
Closed by @wild island
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would u square both sides and then rearrage for sin double angle and then find cos double angle and then cos on sin
that would work
any other better methods
I think that your method is quick enough
alright
would u not get a + - solution for cos then
what would you do in that case
oh nvrmind the restriction
.close
Closed by @void spruce
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help me with this question. I’ve been stuck on it forever. F(2)=2 how do I find f(3)?
@neat tartan Has your question been resolved?
the pic isn't the best, but i think what you need to do is get f(3) and f(2) (since h = 1), and then just input f(3) - f(2)
(i can't read the bottom lines btw, can you send a screenshot instead?)
I got the bottom question done. I just need help with finding f(3). I don’t understand how to find it with just looking at the graph
.close
Closed by @neat tartan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm trying to formalise this proof instead of just using pictures. How is this derivation made formally?
If you're trying to formalize this, like actually formalize it, you'd have to generate some sort of measure of complexity for any given hypothesis, which is a terribly difficult thing to do.
@rare olive Has your question been resolved?
the proof just says assuming:
- group 1, G1, is equally probable to group 2, G2, and
- each theory in G1 is equally probable, and each theory in G2 is equally probable, and
- there are more theories in G2 than G1
then you can derive that:
each theory in G1 is more probable than each theory in G2
the question is how the derivation is made
the definition of complexity is not essential. you could dispense with talk of complexity & the proof would run the same
Say that the probability of each group is $p = p(G1) = p(G2)$ then assuming that $g1 = card(G1), g2 = card(G2)$ and $g2>g1$ (the number of theories in each respective group). Since all elements are equally probable we can conclude that for any $t \in G1$ must be so that $p(t) = p/g1$ (and similarly for every $t \in G2$). Then let's assume that if $t \in G1, h \in G2$ that $p(t) > p(h)$. Inserting the formula we get $\frac{p}{g1} > \frac{p}{g2}$ and since all numbers are strictly positive we can simplify to $g2>g1$ which is true by our assumptions. Have we taken that $p(t) < p(h)$ or that $p(t) = p(h)$ we would contradict our assumptions so it must be so that $p(t) > p(h)$ or that every theory in G1 is more probable than every theory in G2.
Goran
Since all elements are equally probable we can conclude that for any $t \in G1$ must be so that $p(t) = p/g1$ (and similarly for every $t \in G2$).
How does this go?
holy
Every element is equally probable so you divide the probability of the group by the number of elements
is that a well known theorem?
(im not disagreeing, just unfamiliar)
I mean yeah
It's not a hard proof
Although this whole thing is a simplification
This proof which I'm assuming they're using relies on the assumption that the probability of each theory is independent which is reasonable but wasn't stated
To prove it assume that there are n elements in a group each with a probability q and the group as a whole has the probability p. Then the sum of all the probabilities of the group which will be nq has to be equal to p or in other words nq=p or q=p/n
makes sense
how does it assume probabilistic independence?
i thought it assumed mutual exclusivity
that each theory is mutually exclusive
in the group
Mutually exclusive events are also independent but that also is an unstated assumption which is not necessarily true
not necessarily true?
Each theory has it's assumptions so if there are shared assumptions they aren't mutually exclusive but thinking about that leads you to that no answer is possible because of the lack of information
okay, also wanted to ask about what probabilities attach to. probabilities attach to sets, so doesnt that mean the elements of the groups also have to be sets?
Probabilities can attach to sets or individual elements
even if those elements arent sets?
im just asking due to lack of familiarity
my understanding was that probabilities attach to events, and events are sets of outcomes
so they dont attach to outcomes
the outcomes would be the individual elements
Well yes they do but each of those outcomes has a probability of it's own
If you take the classic example of dice outcomes are 1 2 3 4 5 6 but an event can be an even number is rolled
So for the event the probability is 1/2 but each outcome has the probability of 1/6
sure, i see how that works
just to make sure im understanding, the principle says:
if everything in a group, G, is equally probable, then
Pr(g) = Pr(G) / cardinality of G, for any g∈G?
added the correction. is this correct?
if everything in a group, G, is equally probable and mutually exclusive, then
Pr(g) = Pr(G) / cardinality of G, for any g∈G?
Yes
@rare olive Has your question been resolved?
@rare olive Has your question been resolved?
@rare olive Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to solve this?
I know with three equation
but I don't know where to go afterwards
I have (5-h)^2+(4-k)^2=r^2
(2-h)^2+(5-k)^2=r^2
(2+h)^2+(3-k)^2=r^2
@balmy cloak Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @balmy cloak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
am i tweaking
.close
Closed by @mellow mountain
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this would just be span(x) right
so $a \mathbf{x}$
Veni, vidi, perii
all vector spaces have at least 2 subspaces, themselves and ____
{0}
yes
you can use the dimension
not done that yet
you can probably swing something about any other subset not being closed
Closed by @desert pasture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
please save me
the equations that I came up with were, r + l + i = 12, 160=2.5r+4l+2i, 2r=l+i
<@&286206848099549185>
but I cant understan the 32 or the r part
nvm
.close
Closed by @versed bridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i understand all of it except the last line. i don’t know what happened to x^1/3
,tex .exp rules
riemann
i understand the x^-2/3 goes to the denominator but where does the x^1/3 go i don’t see it
Last row here
yea but then wouldn’t it be cube root x next to the 4
No
$(a+b)/c = a/c + b/c$
riemann
@bright pier Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @bright pier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there an easier way to do this
Factorise it
isnt that y^3 + y^3/y^6
take out y^3
y^3 ( 1 + y^-6)
nah thats just complicated
Urs is simplifying I think
no wait
u can write
x^3/2 - x^(-3/2)
as x^3/2 - 1/(x^3/2)
let y = x^1/2
then this would become
y^3-1/y^3
for which u can use the identity a^3-b^3
@sleek hornet
Is that what I wrote 
idont think there is anyohter way
no worries
Closed by @sleek hornet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
y = -2x - 3
what does slope intercept form look like?
y = mx + b
great, so it's already in slope-intercept form
@tardy mural Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I'm kinda struggling with this one, in the way that I don't even know where to start, help would be appreciated
identify the set of points that are equidistant from both
well they would all be on a chord equidistant from A and O, is that right?
Oh yeah
and calculating it's area will lead you to the proportion
np
Closed by @wet sentinel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help pls
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
can someone help me solve 2x+4=8
what
I took out 4
u cant just remove numbers like that
why not
+-x/
ok
amongst others
so 2x=0
no
thanks
no wrong
2x+4=8
ur only subtracting from one side again
do u know what 8-4 is
ok yes
say it
what do u not understand about it

ok but hurry
the difference of logarithms is the logarithm of the quotient?
@strange compass so how do we write it?
?
I see
its the second one
this as
ln2
x 1
x 1
cant read any of that
if u mean
yea I mean that
$$\ln_ 2 \frac{(x-1)}{(x-2)} =\In_{2} 8$$
yes
jack
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
yea I got it
im going to sleep but why ru doing this when u cant solve first order algebra equations
I can bro
(after substitution u = y
4 + 1), thus 1
4
ln(y
4 + 1) = sin x + C1 or ln(y
4 + 1)
Bro I am in pre-cal rn
yea no its not checking out lol
r u good
separable equations are after calc 3
so i really doubt that its u whos doing this
my brother is here with me
hes in calc 3
hes in colledge
hes smart kid
hes hsarp
sharp
/leave
.close
Closed by @split dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Idk how to start this
question 63
the equation of a tangent line at "a" for some f(x) is
f(a) + (x-a)f'(a) = 0
and i'm sure you can figure out the normal line using that
when they mean normal line, it means its perpendicular to the tangent right?
mhm
so would i just solve for the derivative
for part b i'm sure you can just see that that means f'(x) = 0 i.e. find extrema
and substitute into that equation, yes
ngl i forgot how to get from the derivative to find the slow of the line
oh
do i just put the x coordinate for x in the derivative?
yes
oh ok
e.g.
for x^2
if you want to find the slope at x = 2
differentiate to get 2x
then 2(2) = 4
ok so i got 4(4x^2-8x+3)^3(8x-8) as the derivative
would i just plug in 2 for x?
to get the slope
?
this is the eq
so u dont plug in the x coordinate
not slope
just use this
ok cuz i dont remember learning that 😅
ok but for the slope, id just plug it in right?
yes...
@vague flame Has your question been resolved?
i dont get this help
so am i solving for x?
ok wait so how do i do part b
how do i do that
that's the tangent line, so it's just some function of x
you set find the roots of that
wdym?
set it equal to 0
since it's already factored, you can just find where those factors are equal to 0
so like
(8x-8) = 0
and (4x^2-8x+3)^3=0
yea
ohh ok
oh and one last semi-related question.
how do i find the second derivative
is that just the derivative of the derivative
yea
oh ok tyy
@vague flame Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vague flame
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it possible to have 2 shapes with a difference in number of sides of 1 be inside each other such that the inner shape perfectly touches all sides of the outside shape, assuming the inner shape is the one with an extra side. If so, which ones can this occur if your range of shapes is square to dodecagon.
Example: Can a pentagon fit inside a square and have 4 of the pentagon's sides be parallel to the sides of the square + touching them?
yes
@quick ibex Has your question been resolved?
How, is there a way to show that?
@quick ibex Has your question been resolved?
@quick ibex Has your question been resolved?
My bad.
Thanks for the tip
np
Anyway, can anyone explain how I'm meant to show this?
If you have a shape and draw a line running through two adjacent sides of that shape, you get a shape with one extra side. Would that shape fit your description?
Sorry, do you have a visual representation? Also would that still be the standard shape, or would it be irregular?
Irregular
Like this
For a square/pentagon
nonono, you need the whole pentagon inside the whole square
like the image on the right, but all sides of the pentagon must be parallel to the square and touching the square except for 1
You could place this inside a square
And 4 of the sides would be part of the sides of the square
Oh, gotcha, what about if they all have to be regular shapes?
I’d say then the angles are predetermined such that they can’t all be parallel
Closed by @quick ibex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
I need help simplifying sqrt(x)/x^2
root(a^2) = a
root(x^2) = x
root(a/b) = roota/rootb
x^2 = root(y)
can you find y?
What
Yes
so x^2 = root(x^4)
now there is root in both denominator and numerator
you can take root on the whole fraction now
So I should square my expression?
yeah
now it will become root(x/x^4) = root(1/x^3)
or 1/(root x^3)
root(x^3) = x * root(x)
so it comes 1/(x(root(x)))
,, \frac {1}{x*\sqrt{x}}
anjali
Closed by @normal cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could I get some clarification, is this legitimate or a joke?
this is true because addition is commutative
Closed by @cedar void
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to do 1
So basically
I'm like yay 30% sure it's just 21!/26!
<@&286206848099549185>
Could you briefly explain where you got the 21! from, I think I know but just want to double check
@quiet jewel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need some help improving/checking proofs. Here is the first one. I have already edited it a bit (as seen in red)
Very blur
would you like me to rewrite it?
Yes
Looks fine to me
Downside is blur
What kind of blur?
I have to write it in laTex anyways so this is just rough work
Are you talking just about the pic?
Yep
it doesnt appear to be blurry to me 🤷♂️
There is also this one. I am unsure if I should replace what is circled with what I have there in red
Also not sure if the proof is structured in the best way it could be
You could probably start directly by presenting the counterexample
but this works as well
the first part shows that if it's associative, then for all g, h, i, [g + (h+i)^3]^3 = [(g+h)^3+i]^3, and later you presented a counterexample to this. So your proof works as well
Well c) e=0
d)No
e)No
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
Also, I disagree on c)
No e is the identity element
I actually disagree on more things than just c
What
but let sara do it herself, i think she can do it
Here is what I have for them
Your answers look correct, let me check the proofs
yeah i think the proofs look fine
Yeah e is identity element
this line looks incomplete to me
there should be = g as well
since you use it on the next line
but that's a detail
i mean tbf i think that line's probably redundant
cus u don't need (g+e)^3 = (e+g)^3 to conclude there's no identity element
I agree, it just simplifies it to (g + e)^3 which can be done as part of the next step
this is true as well
To find an identity elemente such that
ge=g and e*g=g for all g€ R.
Set ge=g:
This simplifies to:
39e2e+g+392e=939e2e3+ 3g²e = 0
For this to hold for all 9, each coefficient
must be zero:
3e2 0 e 0
e3=0
e=0
3g²e=0⇒e=0
Thus, e = 0 is the identity element.
Result: The identity element is e = 0.
I guess i am right
chatgpt is a large language model trained to give responses that look like human language
E has 0 identity element
that does not mean it can do maths
anyway, even if your proof is correct, you have only shown ge = g -> e = 0
Which isnt sufficient to conclude that 0 is an identity element
you would need to verify the other direction for that, and that's where you would fail miserably
Can you defend your statement
Ofc I can
i think that's fine now
????
Prove
i mean i can really easily disprove that 0 is not an identity
this is =>, not <=>
Do you think this is enough or do I have to show more?
Becuase idk if as indicated in part (c) really can be done : )
Btw, i think that it could include a line where you explicitly assume that e is an identity, otherwise it's fine.
For a simpler proof, you could also just note that by setting g = 1, we get that e must be equal to 0. But by setting g = 2, we see that e = 0 doesnt work. Hence there is no identity
can you explain why does the existence of inverse for all integers require the existence of an identity element?
hmm okay so just saying where e is the identity element would not suffice (like I did at the top there)?
oh, i didnt notice that, yeah it's probably good
and commutativity is good as well
Okie so just this one then needs to be tweaked a bit?

