#help-23
1 messages Ā· Page 255 of 1
Isnt that the same for x^2?
no
x^2 is always positive
because a negative number times a negative is positive
i see now what you did wrong here
there is a minus infron of x^2 in the denominator
What was it? im still confused sry
that means that if you multiply with x^(-2), the denominator will be negative in the limit
so after multiplying both num and den with x^(-k) you will be left with some x^(r-k) in the numerator, where r is the degree of the numerator
if x^(r-k) is odd and r > k, for instance if it's x^3, then you have to be careful when x goes to negative infinity, because in that case x^(r-k) will also go to negative infinity,
I got it down now. Just did like 20 examples and got them all right š
great!
Thank you soooooooo much you are an amazing teacher
And thank you for being patient with me hahaha
you're welcome ā¤ļø
Closed by @steep magnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
doing PLU decomp
i get the correct pivot L and U matrix
but i dont get how when i multiply all of the matrices
i do not get A
i did not really understend what u r asking for but to multipliy matrice u have to multiply l1 by c1 and so on
just look at the color and u wil get the logic behind the multpication between matrix @delicate trellis
PLU decomp
im using a online calc to multiply i do not get the same result
P*A
L*U
sorry i can't help u with that i don't really get it <@&286206848099549185>
<@&268886789983436800> they spamming across every channel
Don't spam this.
Muting you for the day for this. In the future please dm the modmail account to ask for permission before doing this kind of thing.
@delicate trellis Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @delicate trellis
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm confused the way they solved this (the answer is a) but im getting different answers
what is the answer you got and how did you get it?
kebesque
No she's here
@blazing peak
PR = X
NP = 2
2 = 2x - 4
X = 3
3+2 = 5
Still shows roles for me
@blazing peak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Iām confused on how to solve this problem; Solve the triangle (find all side lengths and angle measures)
law of sines :3
ah wait
Either of sines or cosines
law of *cosines
Iāll try it
definitely law of cosines
also my TI-30 cacultor sometimes bugs out on me
Iāve never done law of cosines with SSA Iāve only done it with SSS
It was always one or the other
think about formula of law of cosines
Closed by @amber jay
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i prove the ranks of 2 matrices are equal?
generally
Without knowing their actual rank?
yeah
well i know that the homogeneous systems represented by them have the same set of solutions
Hm then u might know that they have the same nullity or whatever itās called
whats that
And then maybe use rank nullity theorem to conclude about rank
Huh but rank u have?
ok the full question is
Hm too trivial in such case
wdym
Like I meant maybe thatās why u havenāt learnt it yet for this exercise; otherwise it might be like almost directly true form the above I said
ah
And B has this too?
B is what?
Oops I meant to reply to this
no
B can have any set of solutions, its just that its the same set of solutions to AB
proving this was the first part of the question actually
now i need to prove this
What definition of rank do you have?
the number of rows the arent 0s in the row reduced version of the matrix
well i also dont know all the terminology in english
so i might know what that is but not its name
I donāt even know if itās a thing, but trying to think of ways to translate this to something more tangible
Have you done proofs before using this definition?
not proving that 2 ranks are equal no
only using the rank to prove something else
or the other way around
I see, would you directly use this definition
i mean intuitively it makes sense
Or maybe something else?
i could use something else ig?
Well idk depends if you did so, I guess we can stick with it
Ok so this is given?
i proved it yeah
And we also know this?
yes
V(A) is the set of solution for the homogeneous system represented by A
ie the set of solutions to Ax = 0
Oh thatās the null space!
oh
Cool cool
Or differently the kernel
Anyways okay let me think
How far did you come?
I see, damnit if I just remembered a short proof of rank nullity theorem I might of been able to apply it here lol
welp
I can at least start by describing what the end goal is, we want by your definition to show that the number of rows that arenāt 0ās in row reduced AB is equal to the ones in B
Or even alternatively, that the number of rows that are 0ās in row reduced AB is equal to the ones in B
If that helps
right
but we dont know the matrix to know how the reduced version would look like
lol can i just say that the dimention of the set of solutions is equal to the rank?
i dont see why not but thats obviously wrong
Yes right, so the information given and the fact you proved in this case will hopefully illuminate us
because that would prove it in one line
Hm what exactly does this mean?
lets say the rank of B is n
V(B) belongs to F^n
so every element of V(B) is a vector with n elements
and V(B) = V(AB)
so every solution to AB is a vector of n elements
and if all the solutions to AB are vectors of n elements then the number of non 0 rows in the row reduced version of AB must also be n
so the rank of AB is n
actually that might work
right?
How does this follow?
are you trying to show that rank(AB) = rank(B)?
well that means that there are n linearly independent rows
so if a vector of n elements is a solution
then
well yeah i dont know how to prove that part lol
yeah
what information do you have about A and B?
didnt you help me with a combinatorics question a couple of weeks ago?
Thereās a bit of information if you scroll up
.
i might have
Hm Iām not sure
different ways to groups kids into groups of 3 or something like that
anyway
thanks for that if that was you
iirc rank(AB) = rank(B) isn't always true
well theyre asking to prove it so it must be
what is V?
oh the null space?
wait why is this not trivially easy by rank nullity?
Theyāre not allowed
because i dont know what that is
bru
Read the discussion lmao
out of curiosity how would you prove this with rank nullity?
rank nullity says that rank(A) + nullity(A) = # cols of A
oh i cant do that
you can technically prove this using rank-nullity without officially using rank nullity or calling it that
rank nullity is kind of one of those "no shit" results
that works then
Yeah
a matrix that has n columns has n variables
clearly a variable is either pivoted or free
the number of pivoted variables is the rank
it is a pivot when you take the rref
whats rref?
oh
yeah
yes
yes
and this reasoning makes sense?
yes
either a variable is free or pivoted
great
so consider B which is nxn
then B has n variables
we know that V(AB) = V(B) so let's call this k
some k between 0 and n
sure?
whats k?
ah
the dimension of V(AB)
for example, if B was a 3x3 matrix
and it was rank 2, then 2 variables are pivoted and 1 is free
wouldnt that be the number of pivoted variables?
wouldn't what be?
k
yeah
so k is also the rank
i'm saying to call the rank (n-k)
k is the number of free variables
just work with me here
how is it the dimention of V(B) then?
B has n variables, i'm saying that k of them are free and the remaining n-k are pivoted
right
I think you need to motivate the connection between free variables and nullity
but isnt the dimention of V(B) the number of pivoted variables?
Maybe thatās whatās confusing atm
i haven't seen this notation but i thought you said it was the set of homogenous solutions
so V(B) is the set of solutions to Bx = 0
right?
yes
great now think of V(B) as a space that has a particular dimension
the dimension of that space corresponds to the number of free variables
i'm solving Ax = 0, A is a 3x3 matrix with 2 pivoted variables and 1 free variable. then the dimension of V(A) is 1
I think there might be a more intuitive connection, in respect to his terminology
maybe i misunderstood what pivoted and free means
Like have you gone over dimension of vector spaces? I probably guess no if you havenāt talked about vector spaces
pivoted variables are the ones that are nonzero in the row reduced form, these are the variables that contribute to the rank
would be a vector with the-number-of-pivoted-variables elements
right
call this A
then A has 2 pivoted variables and one free varibale
now consider Ax = 0
think about what this means as a system of equations
call the first variable x, the second y, and the third z
then the solution set (x,y,z) to the system Ax = 0 satisfies 1x = 0, 1y = 0, 0 = 0
so since x and y are pivoted
they have fixed values here
x = 0, y = 0
z can be anything
so the number of solutions would be equal to the number of possible values for the free variable
whcih means the space of solutions to Ax = 0 is given by all vectors of the form (0,0,c) where c is any real number
yeah
well technically in this case there are infinitely many solutions
you can think of it as the number of degrees of freedom to describe solution vectors
in this case A has one free variable
and the solution set to Ax = 0 is vectors of the form (0, 0, c)
c is free to be anything
right
great so we say that the dimension of the null space
the null space is V(A) btw
according to your notation
but wait
the dimension of that is 1
(0, 0, c) still has 3 elements
do you know what a basis is?
no
do you know what a span is?
Neil about to teach atleast 3 weeks of material lmao
i know its all the possible vectors represented by something
the reason that the space of solutions (0,0,c) is of dimension 1 is because you can describe every vector in this space as a linear combination of only one vector, like (0,0,1)
the dimesnion of the solution space has nothing to do with the fact that (0,0,c) has three elements
ah
it has to do with the fact that every vector there can be described as a linear cobmination of only one vector
so every vector there could be thought of as a scalar multiple of the vector (0,0,1)
yeah
we say that (0,0,1) would be a basis vector for that space
since you only need one basis vector
right
we say the space has dimension 1
you could think of it as degrees of freedom
if instead i gave you A =
1 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
and you consider Ax = 0
dim would be 2
you have x = 0, 0 = 0, 0 = 0, meaning that your solution space is (0, c, d)
two degrees of freedom
two free variables in the matrix
and the basis for that space would be (0,1,0) and (0,0,1)
since you can describe each vector of (0, c, d) as a linear combination of those two vectors
so diemnsion 2
right
Btw if youād like to gain more intuition about this there is s great video by 3bue1brown
really recommend his LA playlist
great visualization, especially regarding rank and nullity in R^n
noted :)
so do you understand why the dimension of the null space is the number of free variables?
yeah
yeah
yes
so AB also has n variables
yes
now you know that V(AB) = V(B)
their null spaces are the same
this means the dimensions of those null spaces are the same
let's call that dimension k
but i cant really use the term dimention
in other words, if you consider the matrix B, k out of those n variables will be free
yeah
you can say that since V(AB) and V(B) are the same, AB and B have the same number of free variables
that might be a good enough explanation
so
let's call that number of free variables k
right
that means that the remaining n-k variables are pivoted?
yeah
so AB and B both have n variables, and they both have k free variables, so they both have n-k pivoted variables
so they both have the same number of pivoted variables, and therefore the same rank
this idea gets more formalized with the rank-nullity theorem of course but all it really is is a statement about how the number of free variables plus the number of pivoted variables equals the total number of variables
does that all make sense?
and is this enough of a proof without using something you haven't learned?
i think thats enough yeah
Perfect
thanks a lot
happy to help lol
I learned Iām rusty as hell so this was useful for me too
while youre here
another question that i didnt know
given
does there eixst a
tf is a Z_7
such that rk((A|c)) = n
matrices over fields other than R and C are a bit out of my comfort zone lol
good luck though
i dont think so
alright its 4:30 am i should probably sleep lmao
thanks for the help both of you
.close
Closed by @olive vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't know how to interpret the limit in question 4, because while the probability of single outcome with X=n with large n will be small, there will be more outcomes with that large n
well what do you think the probability is that game lasts 1000000000000000 rounds
approximately
great, problem 4 is done
But what if that is the wrong interpretatino

How are you sure
a nice hint is also that it says "without calculating the probability"
kinda reinforces your intuition here
it says without calculating it, what do you think it is
so i don't think you need to be sure for 0 to be an acceptable answer
I guess
Recurrent MC moment šš
also since you obviously expect to lose money in the long run, the odds that you stay in for more and more rounds with this biased coin have to vanish
yea
you only expect the game to last so many rounds
so you can expect longer games to be unlikely
that's not 'rigorous' but it doesn't have to be lol
Closed by @devout shale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is the question
i should show that thi slimit is 1/4
but i am getting 3/4
can i know where i made the mistake?
do you use an "x" for multiplication?
yes
I canāt read well what did you do in your first step
@hazy tundra Has your question been resolved?
ignore this
what i have done is i have taken cosec x out
@hazy tundra Has your question been resolved?
??
<@&286206848099549185>
hospital?
@hazy tundra Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i use WolfAlpha for row reduction of 2 matrices? like [A|B]
For instance, how would I input this into WolfAlpha
try image input and see if tht helps
Closed by @broken nimbus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
13d
how do i solve 3 + ln x> e^x. should i exponentiate everything or???
Consider how the functions on both sides grow as x goes towards infinity
Particularly I want you to notice that the graph for 3+logx would start to grow much, much slower than the graph for e^x
ok how do i go from there?
how do i get theese numbers
Hmm, the question seems to be much out of place of the others
The others are simple algebraic manipulations to solve the inequalities, while for this you will most likely need some sort of functional analysis using complex numbers
Ya agree
First try to draw rough graphs for each of the curves $y=3+\ln(x)$ and $y=e^x$
kheerii
Try to input some values to see where these two graphs intersect (roughly)
For example, at x=1, 3+logx > e^x but at x=0.5, 3+logx<e^x
but why is the lowest value 0.161. the intersect point seems alot more bigger than that
but why is the interval 0.1 - 1.1 the right? isnt e^x bigger every time when x is lower than their intersect compared to the natural log?
Yeah, e^x is bigger when x is less than the first intersection point or when x is greater than the second intersection point
Which means the region between the two intersection points is the region you require
If you make a rough graph youāll see what I mean
This is how i though it
Hmm, not exactly like this
There should be a definite region between the two intersection points
Something of this sort
So the region between the two graphs is what you require
now i understand what the questions want. yeah the region between the blue and the green is where e^x is smlaler
Indeed
but it just seems odd how this question cant be solved by akgebray
Kinda hard to visualise this though but the best way to realise it is to try out random x values
because the other ones i used logs and stuff to simplify but this one was weird
Yeah, there isnāt a simple algebraic way to solve for the intersection points unfortunately
I agree the last part seems very out of place
The answer given is correct though, so there isnāt a mistake in the question
yeah true but the first question 13a had wrong awnser
so maybe the director were a bit trippy when they wrote this chapter lol
Yeah that could be a possibility
@barren bronze Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
my only question is for the sentence write an inequality for how far from the left you can shoot to get least 6 points
do I write my answer in {} or []
what do you interpret those symbols to mean
their for different functions, {} this i think would be for set notation
but its alright now
i found 3<=x<=7
that sounds reasonable
@eternal cloud Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
okay Iāve been stuck on this for 30 minutes if anyone could assist me I would be very grateful
No this entire problem is just hurting my brain
the definition is given in the screenshot
How do I use it
you look at the graph and see for which values of x the left limit does not agree with the right limit or the value of f(x)
that is the point of discontinuity
the function is also piecewise linear
so if you look at it it's definition which is given
there is only one possible candidate x value for a discontinuity
which you need to check to see if it satisfies or does not satisfy the given definition
Is it 3.5 or is that wrong
how did you get 3.5?
Idk I set them equal to each other š
that actually answers another interesting problem
But not this one ?
which would be where should we switch between the two functions when defining a piecewise function to remain continuous
so all linear functions are continuous
then the only point where a discontinuity can be located is where we switch from one linear function to another
what point is that?
2?
How do I do that plug it in ?
a=2
So is that the answer cause a = x
So is that the answer ? 2
I'm not giving the answer, that is the correct candidate to check if the definition is satisfied or not
If you think 2 is the answer, what part of the definition does it fail
That's what the question is asking
Oh it needs to fail ?
you are giving the definition for continuity at point a
you are looking for points of discontinuity
which means NOT continuous
either works
looking at the graph is easiest when given
but you also given the function explicitly and should know how to be able to use it to answer the problem
@primal plaza Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone tell me of this is right
what defintion of the inverses are you using
give the question
they have specific output ranges
its not any angle
usally arccos([-1,1])=[0,pi]
while arcsin([-1,1])=[-pi/2,pi/2]
by convention
@ocean tapir Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ocean tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im confused on how you go from -cotx(-cscxcotx) to cscx(csc^2x -1)
sin^2 + cos^2 = 1
divide through by sin^2:
1 + cot^2 = csc^2, so cot^2 = 1 - csc^2
ok so would you multiply -cot x by (-cscxcotx) to get cotxcscxcot^2x. then you substitute cot^2x for 1-csc^2x. what do you do with the cotxcscx after that?
well first you want to learn how to multiply
multiply -cotx and -cscx cotx together to get csc x cot^2 x
then replace cot^2 with 1-csc^2
Closed by @frosty grail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does this look like in LaTeX ?
$\int_0^{10} \pi (3x-1)^2 \dd{x}$
āαμΩāĻā ¤
I think the integral becomes {\tiny smol} when in "inline mode" $\int_0^{10} \pi (3x-1)^2 \dd{x}$
fix error
fix error
Closed by @marble tartan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if x^2+10x-3 is reducible over Q, then
3(2k+1)^2-(2p+1)^2 must be a multiple of 10 and [3(2k+1)^2]/[2p+1] must be an integer. (2k+1) and (2p+1) must be co prime
Prove there is no k,pāZ that satisfies all conditions
2k+1 and 2p +1 are coprime
Again 3*(2k+1)²/(2p+1) is integer
So 2p +1 = 3
Or p = 1
Also , 3*(2k+1)² - 3² = 10t where t is an integer
Or (2k+1)² = (10t+9)/3
Or (2k+1)² = 10t/3 + 3
1² = 1
2² = 4
3² = 9
4² = 6
5² = 5
6² = 6
7² = 9
8² = 4
9² = 1
You see no square number ends in 3
which one ?
Helppp
The formula for diagonals of a polygon given by n(n-3)/2
Solve this
?
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so it is?
it is not
it has x though
pretty sure that's a multiplication symbol
this question makes no sense if that's just an x
nah
if it was, it'd be the dot
haven't seen a multiplication symbol like that since middle school
i'd even say farther back
but nah, it's an x
nah the font for the x doesnt match the variable form of it
it definitely is a multiplication symbol
i'm like 99% sure it's just bad notation for multiplication
you can make this into a geometric series
so 1/1-r?
more like ar^n
which you'll eventually simplify using this
but first you want it in the right form
so firstly pull out everything that doesn't depend on n
you'll get 7 * sum ((-1)^(n-1) * 3^n / 2^(2n))
can you write 2^(2n) as just a single number being raised to n?
uh
I don't think so
cause whatever value is n, you'd multiply 2 to it
which would drastically affect the value of the function when raised to that power
compared to simplifying it
unless i'm mistaken
but now how am I gonna get it into 1/1-r form for the geometric series?
x^(ab) = (x^a)^b
so 2^(2n) = (2^2)^n
is there a way you can write (-1)^(n-1) as something being raised to just n?
@upbeat ginkgo Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @upbeat ginkgo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does the series look familiar
Summation 1/n! ?
[ f(x) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \f{x^n}{n!} ]
neon
Was it the power series ?
e^x ?
Left hand side = e^(loglog2)
Log2 > 3/5 [ True/False]
You need a calculator to check this
(to find value of log2)
.close
Closed by @buoyant stag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You can verify it using the formula for sine of a sum
sin(a+b) = sin(a)cos(b) + sin(b)cos(a)
Use a = kĻ+x and b = Ļ
Otherwise you can use a graphical way, this one: https://youtu.be/x36tRrVGtX0?feature=shared
In this video I go over an overtly detailed analysis of the trig identity sin(Ļ-x) = sin(x). I go over the simple proof of it but then illustrate how the graph of sin(x) gets shifted to the left by Ļ and then flipped vertically and ending up coinciding with sin(x). This is an interesting trig identity because it's unlike the usual trig identitie...
Also this is false
There is a - in front
i did it didnāt work mb i did something wrong
no itās right
yea i did that?
oh i meant that
Did you do what alberto suggested?
how does -sin(kpi+.
x) = -(-1)^ksinx
how did he get rid of the x
k*
wait no go get it
.thanks
.close
Closed by @hollow elm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the equations of the tangent and the normal to š¦=9āš„2
at the point š¾(1,8)
im stuck with this question im not sure how to get the correct answer
i originally got mtan = -2x-4 and mn = 1/2x + 15/2
Is the function y = 9 - x² ?
you mean $y=9-x^2$?
Skill_Issue
yea
do you know derivatives?
Yep
ok
use the formula for finding the ewuation of a line where you know a point and a slope
$y-y_1=m(x-x_1)$
Skill_Issue
Yes exactly
oh ye oop
ok i understand where i went wrong
but i used a different formula that normaly works
thats just y = mx + b
You can use that too, no problem
it just didnt work when i tried it idk why
@half canyon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My question is at #linear-algebra message
@lone arch Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @lone arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In Euler's formula,
When I take e^(2ĪŗĻi),
when I take e^i(2ĪŗĻ+Ļ),
when I take e^Ļi
!original
In Euler e^i(x) when
x = 2kĻ
or
x = 2kĻ+Ļ
or
x = Ļ
??
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
Are you asking about the values of e^(2ĪŗĻi), e^i(2ĪŗĻ+Ļ) and e^Ļi?
No, when should I take each from the 3
?
The starting problem is 32x^6 + 2x^2 = 0
okay and you are solving for x?
Yes
I found x=0, xā“=-1/16
right
Then for the second x I need Euler's formula
Why Ļi and not i(2kĻ+Ļ)
You could use both. But Ļi is simpler
So it's the same?
or you can just use e^(Ļi + 2kĻi)
which will probably be the best option if you arent entirely familiar with roots of unity
both are equal to -1, so they are essentially the same
To get all the solutions, use this one though
it's the most general one
š
@worthy drift Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @worthy drift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain this step
(the integral at the top is the question)
they've used the fact that 8 is 2^3 and 4 is 2^2 meaning you can then divide by 2^x
okay so i'm getting [{2^(3+3x) + 2^(2+2x)}/2^x]
yea
which gives
is that from integral calculator cause imo the way they've simplified it is kind of an unnatural way of doing it
you could instead just subtract one from each of the x terms and then use substitution
yeah that's why i was really confused
that looks like awht integral calculator gets
this is what i got on me onw
answer isn't it the options tho
the closest I'm getting is (A)
It's B I think
using this step, doing the division and then use substitution u = 3+2x and u = 2+x
oh yeah
which leads to (2x+2)/ln(2) + 2^x+2/ln(2) which simplifies to B
well i'm pretty sure it simplifies to b i would verify that last step
multiple choice maths is stupid half the difficulty sometimes is putting it in some arbitrary form
how do I apply the first u to the first term tho
sorry i'm really new to substitution lmao most of this just flies over my head
i'm getting du = 2dx yea
and du = dx in the second u
yes
how do i apply it to the integration doe
that's where i always get stuck
so you end up with 2^u in the integral which is 2^u / ln(2)
ah right
if you don't know the rule
yeah i know of this one it's just that using it in questions is really confusing
like i don't even know where to put in the du i get half the time lmao
yeah okay so
does 2^(3 + 2x)dx become 2^(u)du?
cus du is 2dx
OH WAIT
dx = 1/2 du
yeah i got it now
thanks a bunch
.close
Closed by @trim vine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\textbf{Context.}\$
I am given the field $$H : 0 \leq z \leq \sqrt{9-x^2-y^2}$$ and the vector field $$\vec{v}(x,y,z) = \begin{pmatrix} \ln(e^x+e^y)+\ln(e^z+e^1) \ \ln(e^x+e^y)+z+1 \ x+y+z+1\end{pmatrix}$$
I had to calculate the flux $\Phi_B$ of $\vec{v}$ of the boundary of $H$ that lies in the $xy$-plane (ground area) from bottom to top. $$\Phi_B = 9\pi$$
Then I had to calculate with Gauss the flux $\Phi_R$ of $\vec{v}$ through the whole boundary are $R$ of $H$ from the inside to the outside. $$\Phi_R = 36\pi$$
$\textbf{Problem.}\$
The last task and my issue was to deduce the flux $\Phi_D$ of $\vec{v}$ through the ceiling area $D$ of the field $H$ from bottom to top and the solution was $$\Phi_D = -45\pi$$ and I didn't understand really why, I'll post the solution of my professor too.
šødĻnš²Ā²s
Are you sure youāre using the words āthroughā, āfrom bottom to topā, etc carefully here?
As that is 90% of the time the reason for the different signs
Also it could be the case that H induced some orientation
I just tried to translate the context at best
Hm okay, so geometrically you only have the fluxes for the boundary of the disk and then the open disk?
And want to find the flux for the dome, put differently Patrickās ceiling from SpongeBob?
Well for shorthand let me just use R,B and D to go correspond to the fluxes
Is my interpretation correct so far?
@fathom jewel Has your question been resolved?
yes
yes
I mean here "boundary area" not "boundary are"
Oh I see!
So we essentially have the flux boundary and you want the flux of the volume?
I don't if it's equivalent to volume
but basically the flux of patricks ceiling + the circle gound
Well Iām now having a hard time parsing the meaning of your use of boundary
Uh no donāt that
boundary surface
Okay, whatās interesting is that that is already Patrickās ceiling
and what I meant by only "boundary"
basically
the half sphere has an intersection
with the xy-plane
this circle intersection
I call boundary
like a border or edge
Oh okay, so it my was former interpretation
yea
I always use the topological boundary for some reason
When itās the manifold one here
Okay
Letās maybe write what the answer is saying, so using shorthand notation i mentored earlier
i dont know what a manifold or topology is
Doesnāt matter donāt worry!
And if the orientation here is infact not the problem
Then we have that R+B=-D
Letās try to interpret this
Does it even make sense
If we add the circle and the open disk flux then we get the negative flux of the ceiling
yea basically
So my question then is, do you think this makes sense?
do you mean by orientation where the normal vector points?
Yeah
Or rather also in which direction the flux is calculated
Which is indirectly determined by that too
Yea basically it's always outwards
from my understanding, this is what was meant by "bottom to top" or "inwards to outwards"
Yeah I would too
And so if our fluxes are positive it means the field was flowing that direction too as you may already know
yea
I guess one weird thing here is that, if you say that R was a circle, i.e a curve
How did you use Gauss?
it was B what you mean
Boundary surface of what?
H is already a surface too
Thereās nothing about H that says itās a volume
It could be interpreted as a shell
well it says it's a field or literally translatede a "body"
unless I used the wrong word and field is something else
Oh thatās the translation confusion lmao
Yeah body was the key here
We use that too in Swedish
Kropp
0_0
Oh nice!
well I got it like 50/50 I think
So the flux of the ground is -9pi geometrically speaking
How?
Oh itās calculation from bottom to top?
yea
Then I think that should be reflected by the value used in Phi_B
yeah idk why it isnt
This might be an error in such case
So could you explain again what D was geometrically?
Just in case
I think I get it now too if my interpretation of D is the same
Might be an error of them to not write minus
Since I may be underestimating the use of ceiling here for D
As otherwise D and R are the same
It says DeckflƤche D of the body K
DeckflƤche is such area that you can see when you look at object from up
Hm doesnāt sound like any nearby Swedish word
Ohā
Yeah
Maybe itās that then
The normal is pointing opposite
And since R contains the floor
We have to remove it
Okay so I think thatās that
,w -45 = -9 + x
Sign error for Phi_B
(Or so it seems)
D is just the same without the floor and opposite normal to R
Which explains the sign change
Oh or maybe Iām being stupid here
There is no sign error for Phi_B maybe?
I don't think so
The funny thing is I asked my professor this already but I didn't understand anything š
The B thing will have a normal point upwards right?
But for R, they are pointing outwards, so the floor for R will be opposite to B
yes
so it's negative then actually
Actually shouldn't it be ground flux + ceiling flux = body flux
Yeah but since D is like looking downwards we have that R is opposite to D without the floor, then just think carefully here what that means for B
Well think about it, if the normal of D is pointing downwards and we know that the vector field is flowing outwards
It has to be negative
Since we are calculating the flux for D from bottom to top
hmm ok
But the ceiling is pointing against that
According to how you described D atleast
Draw some pictures
It really helps
I did
Could you share?
ye
,,\iint_R \vec{v} = \iint_B \vec{v} + \iint_D \vec{v} = \iiint_K \text{div}(\vec{v})
šødĻnš²Ā²s
We know the vector field is flowing outwards becuase of Phi_R being positive
ok
and here R is closed, and D has no floor
YEA
SEE
Oh so this confirms it for you?
no
Okay, look at this, we add R and B
Oh why is D going inwards
then we get D but pointing outwards
because of your description from before?
I am so dumb
maybe its me being dumb here lmao

