#help-23

1 messages Ā· Page 255 of 1

jaunty spire
#

just noticed that this is slighty wrong

steep magnet
#

Isnt that the same for x^2?

jaunty spire
#

no

#

x^2 is always positive

#

because a negative number times a negative is positive

#

i see now what you did wrong here

#

there is a minus infron of x^2 in the denominator

steep magnet
jaunty spire
#

that means that if you multiply with x^(-2), the denominator will be negative in the limit

steep magnet
#

Ahhh I think I get it now

#

Ok I will try some more examples

jaunty spire
#

so after multiplying both num and den with x^(-k) you will be left with some x^(r-k) in the numerator, where r is the degree of the numerator

#

if x^(r-k) is odd and r > k, for instance if it's x^3, then you have to be careful when x goes to negative infinity, because in that case x^(r-k) will also go to negative infinity,

steep magnet
#

I got it down now. Just did like 20 examples and got them all right šŸ˜„

jaunty spire
#

great!

steep magnet
#

Thank you soooooooo much you are an amazing teacher

#

And thank you for being patient with me hahaha

jaunty spire
#

you're welcome ā¤ļø

steep magnet
#

ā¤ļø

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @steep magnet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

delicate trellis
#

doing PLU decomp
i get the correct pivot L and U matrix
but i dont get how when i multiply all of the matrices
i do not get A

robust drift
#

i did not really understend what u r asking for but to multipliy matrice u have to multiply l1 by c1 and so on

#

just look at the color and u wil get the logic behind the multpication between matrix @delicate trellis

delicate trellis
#

im using a online calc to multiply i do not get the same result

#

P*A

#

L*U

robust drift
#

sorry i can't help u with that i don't really get it <@&286206848099549185>

lean otter
#

<@&268886789983436800> they spamming across every channel

polar lynx
#

Don't spam this.

#

Muting you for the day for this. In the future please dm the modmail account to ask for permission before doing this kind of thing.

safe radishBOT
#

@delicate trellis Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @delicate trellis

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

blazing peak
#

i'm confused the way they solved this (the answer is a) but im getting different answers

obsidian oracle
#

what is the answer you got and how did you get it?

flat frigateBOT
#

kebesque

vapid pebble
#

No she's here

#

@blazing peak

#

PR = X

NP = 2

2 = 2x - 4

X = 3

3+2 = 5

#

Still shows roles for me

safe radishBOT
#

@blazing peak Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

amber jay
#

I’m confused on how to solve this problem; Solve the triangle (find all side lengths and angle measures)

vapid pebble
#

Either of sines or cosines

rough storm
#

law of *cosines

amber jay
#

I’ll try it

rough storm
#

definitely law of cosines

amber jay
#

also my TI-30 cacultor sometimes bugs out on me

#

I’ve never done law of cosines with SSA I’ve only done it with SSS

vapid pebble
rough storm
amber jay
#

hmm i think i got it thanks for the help :)

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @amber jay

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

olive vault
#

how do i prove the ranks of 2 matrices are equal?

olive vault
#

generally

long oracle
#

Without knowing their actual rank?

olive vault
#

yeah

#

well i know that the homogeneous systems represented by them have the same set of solutions

long oracle
#

Hm then u might know that they have the same nullity or whatever it’s called

olive vault
#

whats that

long oracle
#

And then maybe use rank nullity theorem to conclude about rank

long oracle
#

Maybe I’m using the wrong term here

olive vault
#

we havent learned that

#

so i dont think im supposed to use it

long oracle
#

Huh but rank u have?

olive vault
#

ok the full question is

long oracle
#

Hm too trivial in such case

olive vault
#

the only solution to Ax = 0 is the trivial one

#

and

#

i need to prove:

olive vault
long oracle
#

Like I meant maybe that’s why u haven’t learnt it yet for this exercise; otherwise it might be like almost directly true form the above I said

olive vault
#

ah

long oracle
olive vault
#

B is what?

long oracle
olive vault
#

no

#

B can have any set of solutions, its just that its the same set of solutions to AB

olive vault
# olive vault

proving this was the first part of the question actually

olive vault
long oracle
#

What definition of rank do you have?

olive vault
#

the number of rows the arent 0s in the row reduced version of the matrix

long oracle
#

I see

#

Was there a term such as pivot row?

olive vault
#

well i also dont know all the terminology in english

#

so i might know what that is but not its name

long oracle
#

I don’t even know if it’s a thing, but trying to think of ways to translate this to something more tangible

#

Have you done proofs before using this definition?

olive vault
#

not proving that 2 ranks are equal no

#

only using the rank to prove something else

#

or the other way around

long oracle
#

I see, would you directly use this definition

olive vault
#

i mean intuitively it makes sense

long oracle
#

Or maybe something else?

olive vault
#

i could use something else ig?

long oracle
#

Well idk depends if you did so, I guess we can stick with it

long oracle
olive vault
#

i proved it yeah

long oracle
olive vault
#

yes

long oracle
#

Ah

#

Hm what’s V

#

Lol

olive vault
#

V(A) is the set of solution for the homogeneous system represented by A

#

ie the set of solutions to Ax = 0

long oracle
#

Oh that’s the null space!

olive vault
#

oh

long oracle
#

Cool cool

#

Or differently the kernel

#

Anyways okay let me think

#

How far did you come?

olive vault
#

well i didnt know how to start to prove a rank

#

so i didnt come anywhere lol

long oracle
#

I see, damnit if I just remembered a short proof of rank nullity theorem I might of been able to apply it here lol

olive vault
#

welp

long oracle
#

I can at least start by describing what the end goal is, we want by your definition to show that the number of rows that aren’t 0’s in row reduced AB is equal to the ones in B

#

Or even alternatively, that the number of rows that are 0’s in row reduced AB is equal to the ones in B

#

If that helps

olive vault
#

right

#

but we dont know the matrix to know how the reduced version would look like

#

lol can i just say that the dimention of the set of solutions is equal to the rank?

#

i dont see why not but thats obviously wrong

long oracle
#

Yes right, so the information given and the fact you proved in this case will hopefully illuminate us

olive vault
#

because that would prove it in one line

long oracle
olive vault
#

lets say the rank of B is n

#

V(B) belongs to F^n

#

so every element of V(B) is a vector with n elements

#

and V(B) = V(AB)

#

so every solution to AB is a vector of n elements

#

and if all the solutions to AB are vectors of n elements then the number of non 0 rows in the row reduced version of AB must also be n

#

so the rank of AB is n

#

actually that might work

#

right?

gusty trench
#

are you trying to show that rank(AB) = rank(B)?

olive vault
#

so if a vector of n elements is a solution

#

then

#

well yeah i dont know how to prove that part lol

gusty trench
#

what information do you have about A and B?

olive vault
#

didnt you help me with a combinatorics question a couple of weeks ago?

long oracle
#

There’s a bit of information if you scroll up

olive vault
long oracle
olive vault
#

anyway

#

thanks for that if that was you

gusty trench
#

iirc rank(AB) = rank(B) isn't always true

olive vault
#

well theyre asking to prove it so it must be

gusty trench
gusty trench
#

oh the null space?

olive vault
#

apparantly except we dont call it that

#

(yet?)

gusty trench
#

wait why is this not trivially easy by rank nullity?

long oracle
#

They’re not allowed

olive vault
#

because i dont know what that is

gusty trench
#

bru

long oracle
#

Read the discussion lmao

olive vault
#

out of curiosity how would you prove this with rank nullity?

gusty trench
#

rank nullity says that rank(A) + nullity(A) = # cols of A

olive vault
#

oh i cant do that

gusty trench
#

you can technically prove this using rank-nullity without officially using rank nullity or calling it that

#

rank nullity is kind of one of those "no shit" results

olive vault
#

that works then

long oracle
#

Yeah

gusty trench
#

a matrix that has n columns has n variables

#

clearly a variable is either pivoted or free

#

the number of pivoted variables is the rank

olive vault
#

what does pivoted mean?

#

ah

gusty trench
#

it is a pivot when you take the rref

olive vault
#

whats rref?

gusty trench
#

row reduced echelon form

#

like gaussian reduction?

olive vault
#

oh

gusty trench
#

you've done that, right?

#

like solving Ax = b

olive vault
#

yeah

gusty trench
#

by row reducng

#

oaky

olive vault
#

yes

gusty trench
#

so you know how you parametize solutions

#

by parametrizing the free variables

olive vault
#

yes

gusty trench
olive vault
#

yes

gusty trench
#

either a variable is free or pivoted

#

great

#

so consider B which is nxn

#

then B has n variables

#

we know that V(AB) = V(B) so let's call this k

#

some k between 0 and n

#

sure?

olive vault
#

whats k?

gusty trench
#

just some number

#

the number of free variables

olive vault
#

ah

gusty trench
#

the dimension of V(AB)

#

for example, if B was a 3x3 matrix

#

and it was rank 2, then 2 variables are pivoted and 1 is free

olive vault
#

wouldnt that be the number of pivoted variables?

gusty trench
#

wouldn't what be?

olive vault
#

k

olive vault
#

so k is also the rank

gusty trench
#

i'm saying to call the rank (n-k)

#

k is the number of free variables

#

just work with me here

olive vault
#

how is it the dimention of V(B) then?

gusty trench
#

B has n variables, i'm saying that k of them are free and the remaining n-k are pivoted

olive vault
#

right

long oracle
#

I think you need to motivate the connection between free variables and nullity

olive vault
#

but isnt the dimention of V(B) the number of pivoted variables?

long oracle
#

Maybe that’s what’s confusing atm

gusty trench
#

so V(B) is the set of solutions to Bx = 0

#

right?

olive vault
#

yes

gusty trench
#

great now think of V(B) as a space that has a particular dimension

#

the dimension of that space corresponds to the number of free variables

olive vault
#

we havent learned vector spaces yet

#

but what im thinking is

gusty trench
#

i'm solving Ax = 0, A is a 3x3 matrix with 2 pivoted variables and 1 free variable. then the dimension of V(A) is 1

long oracle
#

I think there might be a more intuitive connection, in respect to his terminology

olive vault
long oracle
#

Like have you gone over dimension of vector spaces? I probably guess no if you haven’t talked about vector spaces

gusty trench
#

pivoted variables are the ones that are nonzero in the row reduced form, these are the variables that contribute to the rank

olive vault
#

right

#

so a solution so a matrix like this

gusty trench
#

oh here's a good example

#

consider this matrix

#

1 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 0

olive vault
#

would be a vector with the-number-of-pivoted-variables elements

olive vault
gusty trench
#

then A has 2 pivoted variables and one free varibale

#

now consider Ax = 0

#

think about what this means as a system of equations

#

call the first variable x, the second y, and the third z

#

then the solution set (x,y,z) to the system Ax = 0 satisfies 1x = 0, 1y = 0, 0 = 0

olive vault
#

ohhhhhhh

#

righttt

#

got it

#

yeah

gusty trench
#

so since x and y are pivoted

#

they have fixed values here

#

x = 0, y = 0

#

z can be anything

olive vault
#

so the number of solutions would be equal to the number of possible values for the free variable

gusty trench
#

whcih means the space of solutions to Ax = 0 is given by all vectors of the form (0,0,c) where c is any real number

olive vault
#

yeah

gusty trench
olive vault
#

i got confused earlier i shouldve known this

#

my bad

gusty trench
#

you can think of it as the number of degrees of freedom to describe solution vectors

#

in this case A has one free variable

#

and the solution set to Ax = 0 is vectors of the form (0, 0, c)

#

c is free to be anything

olive vault
#

right

gusty trench
#

great so we say that the dimension of the null space

#

the null space is V(A) btw

#

according to your notation

olive vault
#

but wait

gusty trench
#

the dimension of that is 1

olive vault
#

(0, 0, c) still has 3 elements

gusty trench
#

do you know what a basis is?

olive vault
#

no

gusty trench
#

do you know what a span is?

olive vault
#

no

#

well kind of but i cant use that

long oracle
#

Neil about to teach atleast 3 weeks of material lmao

olive vault
#

i know its all the possible vectors represented by something

gusty trench
olive vault
#

and i guess that something is the basis

#

or something like that

gusty trench
#

the dimesnion of the solution space has nothing to do with the fact that (0,0,c) has three elements

gusty trench
#

it has to do with the fact that every vector there can be described as a linear cobmination of only one vector

olive vault
#

ok

#

got it

gusty trench
#

so every vector there could be thought of as a scalar multiple of the vector (0,0,1)

olive vault
#

yeah

gusty trench
#

we say that (0,0,1) would be a basis vector for that space

#

since you only need one basis vector

olive vault
#

right

gusty trench
#

we say the space has dimension 1

#

you could think of it as degrees of freedom

#

if instead i gave you A =

1 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0

#

and you consider Ax = 0

olive vault
#

dim would be 2

gusty trench
#

you have x = 0, 0 = 0, 0 = 0, meaning that your solution space is (0, c, d)

#

two degrees of freedom

#

two free variables in the matrix

olive vault
#

yeah

#

right

gusty trench
#

and the basis for that space would be (0,1,0) and (0,0,1)

#

since you can describe each vector of (0, c, d) as a linear combination of those two vectors

#

so diemnsion 2

olive vault
#

right

long oracle
#

Btw if you’d like to gain more intuition about this there is s great video by 3bue1brown

gusty trench
#

really recommend his LA playlist

#

great visualization, especially regarding rank and nullity in R^n

olive vault
#

noted :)

gusty trench
#

so do you understand why the dimension of the null space is the number of free variables?

olive vault
#

yeah

gusty trench
#

great then let's try again

#

B is an nxn matrix

#

that means n variables

olive vault
#

yeah

gusty trench
#

A is an mxn matrix

#

so AB also has dimension mxn

#

right

olive vault
#

yes

gusty trench
#

so AB also has n variables

olive vault
#

yes

gusty trench
#

now you know that V(AB) = V(B)

#

their null spaces are the same

#

this means the dimensions of those null spaces are the same

#

let's call that dimension k

olive vault
#

but i cant really use the term dimention

gusty trench
#

in other words, if you consider the matrix B, k out of those n variables will be free

olive vault
#

yeah

gusty trench
#

you can say that since V(AB) and V(B) are the same, AB and B have the same number of free variables

olive vault
#

ah

#

right

gusty trench
#

that might be a good enough explanation

#

so

#

let's call that number of free variables k

olive vault
#

right

gusty trench
#

that means that the remaining n-k variables are pivoted?

olive vault
#

yeah

gusty trench
#

so AB and B both have n variables, and they both have k free variables, so they both have n-k pivoted variables

#

so they both have the same number of pivoted variables, and therefore the same rank

#

this idea gets more formalized with the rank-nullity theorem of course but all it really is is a statement about how the number of free variables plus the number of pivoted variables equals the total number of variables

#

does that all make sense?

#

and is this enough of a proof without using something you haven't learned?

olive vault
#

i think thats enough yeah

long oracle
#

Perfect

olive vault
#

thanks a lot

gusty trench
#

happy to help lol

long oracle
#

I learned I’m rusty as hell so this was useful for me too

olive vault
#

while youre here

#

another question that i didnt know

#

given

#

does there eixst a

gusty trench
#

tf is a Z_7

olive vault
#

such that rk((A|c)) = n

olive vault
#

F_7

gusty trench
#

matrices over fields other than R and C are a bit out of my comfort zone lol

#

good luck though

olive vault
#

no worries

#

thanks

long oracle
#

Hm I wonder if this just becomes a tedious exercise of checking

#

But also no nvm

olive vault
#

i dont think so

#

alright its 4:30 am i should probably sleep lmao

#

thanks for the help both of you

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @olive vault

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

devout shale
safe radishBOT
devout shale
#

I don't know how to interpret the limit in question 4, because while the probability of single outcome with X=n with large n will be small, there will be more outcomes with that large n

solar hazel
#

well what do you think the probability is that game lasts 1000000000000000 rounds

#

approximately

devout shale
#

small

#

0

solar hazel
#

great, problem 4 is done

devout shale
#

But what if that is the wrong interpretatino

solar hazel
devout shale
#

How are you sure

gusty trench
#

a nice hint is also that it says "without calculating the probability"

#

kinda reinforces your intuition here

solar hazel
#

it says without calculating it, what do you think it is
so i don't think you need to be sure for 0 to be an acceptable answer

devout shale
#

I guess

obtuse plover
#

Recurrent MC moment šŸ™ˆšŸ™‰

devout shale
gusty trench
#

also since you obviously expect to lose money in the long run, the odds that you stay in for more and more rounds with this biased coin have to vanish

solar hazel
#

yea

#

you only expect the game to last so many rounds

#

so you can expect longer games to be unlikely

#

that's not 'rigorous' but it doesn't have to be lol

devout shale
#

Alrighty, thank you sirs and maam

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @devout shale

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hazy tundra
safe radishBOT
hazy tundra
hazy tundra
#

i should show that thi slimit is 1/4

#

but i am getting 3/4

#

can i know where i made the mistake?

jaunty spire
#

do you use an "x" for multiplication?

hazy tundra
jaunty spire
#

don't do that lol

#

it makes your writing kinda confusing

hazy tundra
#

srry

#

anyone?

lime dust
#

I can’t read well what did you do in your first step

safe radishBOT
#

@hazy tundra Has your question been resolved?

hazy tundra
#

ignore this

hazy tundra
#

what i have done is i have taken cosec x out

safe radishBOT
#

@hazy tundra Has your question been resolved?

hazy tundra
#

??

hazy tundra
#

<@&286206848099549185>

heady lava
#

hospital?

hazy tundra
#

bruh

#

u guys are useless

safe radishBOT
#

@hazy tundra Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

broken nimbus
#

How do i use WolfAlpha for row reduction of 2 matrices? like [A|B]

broken nimbus
#

For instance, how would I input this into WolfAlpha

kind forge
broken nimbus
#

Ok i got it now, thanks

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @broken nimbus

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

grand jolt
safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

barren bronze
safe radishBOT
barren bronze
#

how do i solve 3 + ln x> e^x. should i exponentiate everything or???

faint seal
#

Consider how the functions on both sides grow as x goes towards infinity

#

Particularly I want you to notice that the graph for 3+logx would start to grow much, much slower than the graph for e^x

barren bronze
#

how do i get theese numbers

faint seal
#

Hmm, the question seems to be much out of place of the others

#

The others are simple algebraic manipulations to solve the inequalities, while for this you will most likely need some sort of functional analysis using complex numbers

barren bronze
#

Ya agree

faint seal
#

First try to draw rough graphs for each of the curves $y=3+\ln(x)$ and $y=e^x$

flat frigateBOT
#

kheerii

faint seal
#

Try to input some values to see where these two graphs intersect (roughly)

#

For example, at x=1, 3+logx > e^x but at x=0.5, 3+logx<e^x

barren bronze
#

but why is the lowest value 0.161. the intersect point seems alot more bigger than that

faint seal
#

0.161 sounds good to me

#

Why do you think it should be larger?

barren bronze
#

but why is the interval 0.1 - 1.1 the right? isnt e^x bigger every time when x is lower than their intersect compared to the natural log?

faint seal
#

Yeah, e^x is bigger when x is less than the first intersection point or when x is greater than the second intersection point

#

Which means the region between the two intersection points is the region you require

#

If you make a rough graph you’ll see what I mean

barren bronze
#

This is how i though it

faint seal
#

Hmm, not exactly like this

#

There should be a definite region between the two intersection points

#

Something of this sort

#

So the region between the two graphs is what you require

barren bronze
#

now i understand what the questions want. yeah the region between the blue and the green is where e^x is smlaler

faint seal
#

Indeed

barren bronze
#

but it just seems odd how this question cant be solved by akgebray

faint seal
#

Kinda hard to visualise this though but the best way to realise it is to try out random x values

barren bronze
#

because the other ones i used logs and stuff to simplify but this one was weird

faint seal
faint seal
#

The answer given is correct though, so there isn’t a mistake in the question

barren bronze
#

yeah true but the first question 13a had wrong awnser

#

so maybe the director were a bit trippy when they wrote this chapter lol

faint seal
#

Yeah that could be a possibility

barren bronze
#

but thanks for the help man, i appreciate it

#

🫔

safe radishBOT
#

@barren bronze Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

eternal cloud
safe radishBOT
eternal cloud
#

my only question is for the sentence write an inequality for how far from the left you can shoot to get least 6 points

#

do I write my answer in {} or []

marsh walrus
#

what do you interpret those symbols to mean

eternal cloud
#

their for different functions, {} this i think would be for set notation

#

but its alright now

#

i found 3<=x<=7

marsh walrus
#

that sounds reasonable

safe radishBOT
#

@eternal cloud Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

primal plaza
#

okay I’ve been stuck on this for 30 minutes if anyone could assist me I would be very grateful

primal plaza
#

No this entire problem is just hurting my brain

short jackal
#

the definition is given in the screenshot

primal plaza
short jackal
#

you look at the graph and see for which values of x the left limit does not agree with the right limit or the value of f(x)

#

that is the point of discontinuity

#

the function is also piecewise linear

#

so if you look at it it's definition which is given

#

there is only one possible candidate x value for a discontinuity

#

which you need to check to see if it satisfies or does not satisfy the given definition

short jackal
#

how did you get 3.5?

primal plaza
short jackal
#

that actually answers another interesting problem

primal plaza
short jackal
#

which would be where should we switch between the two functions when defining a piecewise function to remain continuous

#

so all linear functions are continuous

#

then the only point where a discontinuity can be located is where we switch from one linear function to another

#

what point is that?

primal plaza
short jackal
#

yes

#

now check the definition there

primal plaza
short jackal
#

a=2

primal plaza
primal plaza
short jackal
#

I'm not giving the answer, that is the correct candidate to check if the definition is satisfied or not

#

If you think 2 is the answer, what part of the definition does it fail

#

That's what the question is asking

primal plaza
short jackal
#

you are giving the definition for continuity at point a

#

you are looking for points of discontinuity

#

which means NOT continuous

primal plaza
#

And is there work to do this

#

Or you just look at the graph

short jackal
#

either works

#

looking at the graph is easiest when given

#

but you also given the function explicitly and should know how to be able to use it to answer the problem

safe radishBOT
#

@primal plaza Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ocean tapir
safe radishBOT
ocean tapir
#

Can someone tell me of this is right

long oracle
#

what defintion of the inverses are you using

dreamy perch
#

give the question

long oracle
#

they have specific output ranges

#

its not any angle

#

usally arccos([-1,1])=[0,pi]

#

while arcsin([-1,1])=[-pi/2,pi/2]

#

by convention

safe radishBOT
#

@ocean tapir Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @ocean tapir

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

frosty grail
#

im confused on how you go from -cotx(-cscxcotx) to cscx(csc^2x -1)

still charm
#

sin^2 + cos^2 = 1
divide through by sin^2:
1 + cot^2 = csc^2, so cot^2 = 1 - csc^2

frosty grail
#

ok so would you multiply -cot x by (-cscxcotx) to get cotxcscxcot^2x. then you substitute cot^2x for 1-csc^2x. what do you do with the cotxcscx after that?

still charm
#

well first you want to learn how to multiply

#

multiply -cotx and -cscx cotx together to get csc x cot^2 x

#

then replace cot^2 with 1-csc^2

frosty grail
#

oh ok thank you.

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @frosty grail

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

marble tartan
#

what does this look like in LaTeX ?

safe radishBOT
thin bridge
#

$\int_0^{10} \pi (3x-1)^2 \dd{x}$

flat frigateBOT
#

ā„Ī±Ī¼Ī©ā„•Ļ‰ā…¤

nocturne elm
#

I think the integral becomes {\tiny smol} when in "inline mode" $\int_0^{10} \pi (3x-1)^2 \dd{x}$

flat frigateBOT
#

fix error

nocturne elm
#

Hmm, it doesn't

#

$\smallint_0^{10} \pi (3x-1)^2 \dd{x}$ is a bit too small

flat frigateBOT
#

fix error

marble tartan
#

huh cool, thanks yall

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @marble tartan

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lean otter
#

if x^2+10x-3 is reducible over Q, then
3(2k+1)^2-(2p+1)^2 must be a multiple of 10 and [3(2k+1)^2]/[2p+1] must be an integer. (2k+1) and (2p+1) must be co prime

Prove there is no k,p∈Z that satisfies all conditions

spice wing
#

2k+1 and 2p +1 are coprime

#

Again 3*(2k+1)²/(2p+1) is integer

#

So 2p +1 = 3

#

Or p = 1

#

Also , 3*(2k+1)² - 3² = 10t where t is an integer

#

Or (2k+1)² = (10t+9)/3

#

Or (2k+1)² = 10t/3 + 3

#

1² = 1
2² = 4
3² = 9
4² = 6
5² = 5
6² = 6
7² = 9
8² = 4
9² = 1
You see no square number ends in 3

true flame
spice wing
#

which one ?

true flame
#

Helppp

spice wing
#

The formula for diagonals of a polygon given by n(n-3)/2

true flame
#

12

#

In the 13

spice wing
#

So n(n-3)/4 = n

#

This is 12

spice wing
true flame
#

Okii

#

Resolutiom

spice wing
#

?

true flame
safe radishBOT
#

@lean otter Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

upbeat ginkgo
safe radishBOT
upbeat ginkgo
#

don't know how to start this

#

is it a power series?

gusty trench
#

a power series has a variable in it

#

like x

upbeat ginkgo
#

so it is?

gusty trench
#

it is not

upbeat ginkgo
#

it has x though

gusty trench
#

pretty sure that's a multiplication symbol

#

this question makes no sense if that's just an x

upbeat ginkgo
#

nah

#

if it was, it'd be the dot

#

haven't seen a multiplication symbol like that since middle school

#

i'd even say farther back

#

but nah, it's an x

terse lichen
#

nah the font for the x doesnt match the variable form of it

#

it definitely is a multiplication symbol

gusty trench
#

i'm like 99% sure it's just bad notation for multiplication

upbeat ginkgo
#

breh

#

lol

#

alrighty then!

gusty trench
#

you can make this into a geometric series

upbeat ginkgo
#

so 1/1-r?

gusty trench
#

more like ar^n

gusty trench
#

but first you want it in the right form

#

so firstly pull out everything that doesn't depend on n

#

you'll get 7 * sum ((-1)^(n-1) * 3^n / 2^(2n))

#

can you write 2^(2n) as just a single number being raised to n?

upbeat ginkgo
#

uh

#

I don't think so

#

cause whatever value is n, you'd multiply 2 to it

#

which would drastically affect the value of the function when raised to that power

#

compared to simplifying it

#

unless i'm mistaken

#

but now how am I gonna get it into 1/1-r form for the geometric series?

gusty trench
#

x^(ab) = (x^a)^b

#

so 2^(2n) = (2^2)^n

#

is there a way you can write (-1)^(n-1) as something being raised to just n?

upbeat ginkgo
#

hmm

#

lemme think about that

#

one moment

#

I have no clue

safe radishBOT
#

@upbeat ginkgo Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @upbeat ginkgo

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lean otter
safe radishBOT
pseudo scroll
#

Does the series look familiar

lean otter
#

Summation 1/n! ?

pseudo scroll
#

[ f(x) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \f{x^n}{n!} ]

flat frigateBOT
lean otter
#

Was it the power series ?

pseudo scroll
#

yess

#

of what

lean otter
#

e^x ?

#

Left hand side = e^(loglog2)

#

Log2 > 3/5 [ True/False]

#

You need a calculator to check this

#

(to find value of log2)

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @buoyant stag

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hollow elm
safe radishBOT
hollow elm
#

how does sin (kpi+x+pi) = -sin(kpi+x)

#

and how does that equal (-1)^k sinx

burnt notch
#

You can verify it using the formula for sine of a sum

#

sin(a+b) = sin(a)cos(b) + sin(b)cos(a)

#

Use a = kπ+x and b = π

#

Otherwise you can use a graphical way, this one: https://youtu.be/x36tRrVGtX0?feature=shared

In this video I go over an overtly detailed analysis of the trig identity sin(π-x) = sin(x). I go over the simple proof of it but then illustrate how the graph of sin(x) gets shifted to the left by π and then flipped vertically and ending up coinciding with sin(x). This is an interesting trig identity because it's unlike the usual trig identitie...

ā–¶ Play video
lime dust
#

There is a - in front

hollow elm
#

no it’s right

lime dust
#

-(-1)^ksinx

#

This is right

hollow elm
#

yea i did that?

lime dust
#

I read your writing

hollow elm
#

oh i meant that

lime dust
#

Did you do what alberto suggested?

hollow elm
#

how does -sin(kpi+.
x) = -(-1)^ksinx

#

how did he get rid of the x

#

k*

#

wait no go get it

#

.thanks

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hollow elm

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

half canyon
#

Find the equations of the tangent and the normal to š‘¦=9āˆ’š‘„2
at the point š¾(1,8)
im stuck with this question im not sure how to get the correct answer
i originally got mtan = -2x-4 and mn = 1/2x + 15/2

flat frigateBOT
#

Skill_Issue

half canyon
#

yea

quick crater
#

do you know derivatives?

half canyon
#

yes

#

i gt -2x

burnt notch
#

Yep

quick crater
#

ok

#

use the formula for finding the ewuation of a line where you know a point and a slope

#

$y-y_1=m(x-x_1)$

flat frigateBOT
#

Skill_Issue

quick crater
#

x1=1, y1=8, m you get as -2x

#

wait a minute

half canyon
#

isnt m just -2

#

since -2x = -2(1)

burnt notch
#

Yes exactly

quick crater
#

oh ye oop

half canyon
#

ok i understand where i went wrong

#

but i used a different formula that normaly works

#

thats just y = mx + b

burnt notch
#

You can use that too, no problem

half canyon
#

it just didnt work when i tried it idk why

safe radishBOT
#

@half canyon Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lone arch
safe radishBOT
#

@lone arch Has your question been resolved?

lone arch
#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lone arch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

worthy drift
#

In Euler's formula,
When I take e^(2ĪŗĻ€i),
when I take e^i(2ĪŗĻ€+Ļ€),
when I take e^Ļ€i

low vector
#

!original

worthy drift
#

In Euler e^i(x) when
x = 2kπ
or
x = 2kπ+π
or
x = π
??

safe radishBOT
#

Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.

peak estuary
#

you havent asked a question

#

when you do (thing), then (...) ?

brave wolf
#

Are you asking about the values of e^(2ĪŗĻ€i), e^i(2ĪŗĻ€+Ļ€) and e^Ļ€i?

worthy drift
#

Yes

#

How I know what from the 3 should I take

brave wolf
#

e^(2ĪŗĻ€i) = cos(2ĪŗĻ€) + i*sin(2ĪŗĻ€)

#

right?

worthy drift
brave wolf
#

?

worthy drift
#

The starting problem is 32x^6 + 2x^2 = 0

brave wolf
#

okay and you are solving for x?

worthy drift
#

Yes

brave wolf
#

first of all, factor out x^2

#

what will you get?

#

(Or 2x^2, that works too)

worthy drift
#

I found x=0, x⁓=-1/16

brave wolf
worthy drift
#

Then for the second x I need Euler's formula

brave wolf
#

indeed

#

-1/16 = (-1) * 1/16

#

and -1 = e^(Ļ€i)

worthy drift
brave wolf
#

You could use both. But πi is simpler

worthy drift
#

So it's the same?

brave wolf
#

or you can just use e^(πi + 2kπi)

#

which will probably be the best option if you arent entirely familiar with roots of unity

brave wolf
worthy drift
#

Oh, now I get it, it is the same

#

Thank you

brave wolf
#

it's the most general one

worthy drift
#

šŸ‘

safe radishBOT
#

@worthy drift Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @worthy drift

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

trim vine
#

can someone explain this step

safe radishBOT
trim vine
#

(the integral at the top is the question)

vital tangle
#

they've used the fact that 8 is 2^3 and 4 is 2^2 meaning you can then divide by 2^x

trim vine
#

yeah I got that

#

wait but

#

okay hold on

trim vine
vital tangle
#

yea

trim vine
#

which gives

vital tangle
#

is that from integral calculator cause imo the way they've simplified it is kind of an unnatural way of doing it

trim vine
vital tangle
#

you could instead just subtract one from each of the x terms and then use substitution

trim vine
trim vine
vital tangle
#

that looks like awht integral calculator gets

trim vine
#

answer isn't it the options tho

#

the closest I'm getting is (A)

vital tangle
#

It's B I think

vital tangle
trim vine
#

oh yeah

vital tangle
#

which leads to (2x+2)/ln(2) + 2^x+2/ln(2) which simplifies to B

trim vine
#

how could i miss substitution

#

dagnabbit

vital tangle
#

well i'm pretty sure it simplifies to b i would verify that last step

#

multiple choice maths is stupid half the difficulty sometimes is putting it in some arbitrary form

trim vine
#

sorry i'm really new to substitution lmao most of this just flies over my head

#

i'm getting du = 2dx yea

#

and du = dx in the second u

vital tangle
#

yes

trim vine
#

that's where i always get stuck

vital tangle
#

so you end up with 2^u in the integral which is 2^u / ln(2)

trim vine
#

ah right

vital tangle
#

if you don't know the rule

trim vine
#

yeah i know of this one it's just that using it in questions is really confusing

#

like i don't even know where to put in the du i get half the time lmao

#

yeah okay so

trim vine
#

cus du is 2dx

#

OH WAIT
dx = 1/2 du

#

yeah i got it now

#

thanks a bunch

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @trim vine

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #ā“how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

fathom jewel
#

$\textbf{Context.}\$
I am given the field $$H : 0 \leq z \leq \sqrt{9-x^2-y^2}$$ and the vector field $$\vec{v}(x,y,z) = \begin{pmatrix} \ln(e^x+e^y)+\ln(e^z+e^1) \ \ln(e^x+e^y)+z+1 \ x+y+z+1\end{pmatrix}$$

I had to calculate the flux $\Phi_B$ of $\vec{v}$ of the boundary of $H$ that lies in the $xy$-plane (ground area) from bottom to top. $$\Phi_B = 9\pi$$

Then I had to calculate with Gauss the flux $\Phi_R$ of $\vec{v}$ through the whole boundary are $R$ of $H$ from the inside to the outside. $$\Phi_R = 36\pi$$

$\textbf{Problem.}\$
The last task and my issue was to deduce the flux $\Phi_D$ of $\vec{v}$ through the ceiling area $D$ of the field $H$ from bottom to top and the solution was $$\Phi_D = -45\pi$$ and I didn't understand really why, I'll post the solution of my professor too.

flat frigateBOT
#

š”ødωnš“²Ā²s

fathom jewel
long oracle
#

Are you sure you’re using the words ā€œthroughā€, ā€œfrom bottom to topā€, etc carefully here?

#

As that is 90% of the time the reason for the different signs

#

Also it could be the case that H induced some orientation

fathom jewel
#

I just tried to translate the context at best

long oracle
#

Hm okay, so geometrically you only have the fluxes for the boundary of the disk and then the open disk?

#

And want to find the flux for the dome, put differently Patrick’s ceiling from SpongeBob?

#

Well for shorthand let me just use R,B and D to go correspond to the fluxes

#

Is my interpretation correct so far?

safe radishBOT
#

@fathom jewel Has your question been resolved?

fathom jewel
long oracle
#

Oh I see!

#

So we essentially have the flux boundary and you want the flux of the volume?

fathom jewel
#

I don't if it's equivalent to volume

#

but basically the flux of patricks ceiling + the circle gound

long oracle
#

Well I’m now having a hard time parsing the meaning of your use of boundary

fathom jewel
#

Rand

#

Let me ask chatgpt

long oracle
#

Uh no don’t that

fathom jewel
#

boundary surface

long oracle
#

Okay, what’s interesting is that that is already Patrick’s ceiling

fathom jewel
#

and what I meant by only "boundary"

#

basically

#

the half sphere has an intersection

#

with the xy-plane

#

this circle intersection

#

I call boundary

#

like a border or edge

long oracle
#

Oh okay, so it my was former interpretation

fathom jewel
#

yea

long oracle
#

I always use the topological boundary for some reason

#

When it’s the manifold one here

#

Okay

#

Let’s maybe write what the answer is saying, so using shorthand notation i mentored earlier

fathom jewel
#

i dont know what a manifold or topology is

long oracle
#

Doesn’t matter don’t worry!

long oracle
#

Then we have that R+B=-D

#

Let’s try to interpret this

#

Does it even make sense

#

If we add the circle and the open disk flux then we get the negative flux of the ceiling

fathom jewel
#

yea basically

long oracle
#

And this is assuming all the orientations are the same

#

Which it seems it was

long oracle
fathom jewel
#

do you mean by orientation where the normal vector points?

long oracle
#

Yeah

#

Or rather also in which direction the flux is calculated

#

Which is indirectly determined by that too

fathom jewel
#

Yea basically it's always outwards

#

from my understanding, this is what was meant by "bottom to top" or "inwards to outwards"

long oracle
#

Yeah I would too

#

And so if our fluxes are positive it means the field was flowing that direction too as you may already know

fathom jewel
#

yea

long oracle
#

I guess one weird thing here is that, if you say that R was a circle, i.e a curve

#

How did you use Gauss?

fathom jewel
#

R was not the circle

#

it's the boundary surface

long oracle
#

Hm I thought that was the very thing we concluded

#

Okay, so let’s stop

fathom jewel
#

it was B what you mean

long oracle
#

Boundary surface of what?

fathom jewel
#

of the field H

#

I think I actually just got it

long oracle
#

H is already a surface too

#

There’s nothing about H that says it’s a volume

#

It could be interpreted as a shell

fathom jewel
#

well it says it's a field or literally translatede a "body"

#

unless I used the wrong word and field is something else

long oracle
#

Oh that’s the translation confusion lmao

#

Yeah body was the key here

#

We use that too in Swedish

#

Kropp

fathom jewel
#

jag vet

#

ok

long oracle
#

0_0

long oracle
fathom jewel
#

well I got it like 50/50 I think

#

So the flux of the ground is -9pi geometrically speaking

long oracle
#

How?

fathom jewel
#

Probably cause the normal vector points down?

#

that's my assumption

long oracle
#

Oh it’s calculation from bottom to top?

fathom jewel
#

yea

long oracle
#

Then I think that should be reflected by the value used in Phi_B

fathom jewel
#

yeah idk why it isnt

long oracle
#

This might be an error in such case

#

So could you explain again what D was geometrically?

#

Just in case

#

I think I get it now too if my interpretation of D is the same

#

Might be an error of them to not write minus

fathom jewel
#

ok

#

hold on

long oracle
#

Since I may be underestimating the use of ceiling here for D

#

As otherwise D and R are the same

fathom jewel
#

It says DeckflƤche D of the body K

#

DeckflƤche is such area that you can see when you look at object from up

long oracle
#

Hm doesn’t sound like any nearby Swedish word

#

Oh’

#

Yeah

#

Maybe it’s that then

#

The normal is pointing opposite

#

And since R contains the floor

#

We have to remove it

#

Okay so I think that’s that

fathom jewel
#

,w -45 = -9 + x

long oracle
#

Sign error for Phi_B

#

(Or so it seems)

#

D is just the same without the floor and opposite normal to R

#

Which explains the sign change

#

Oh or maybe I’m being stupid here

#

There is no sign error for Phi_B maybe?

fathom jewel
#

I don't think so

#

The funny thing is I asked my professor this already but I didn't understand anything 😭

long oracle
#

The B thing will have a normal point upwards right?

fathom jewel
#

yea

#

it literally says in the solution pointing upwars

long oracle
#

But for R, they are pointing outwards, so the floor for R will be opposite to B

fathom jewel
#

yes

#

so it's negative then actually

#

Actually shouldn't it be ground flux + ceiling flux = body flux

long oracle
#

Yeah but since D is like looking downwards we have that R is opposite to D without the floor, then just think carefully here what that means for B

fathom jewel
#

ground flux + ceiling flux = body flux
-9 + x = 36

#

,w -9 + x = 36

fathom jewel
#

I think it was like 45 going in and 9 going out

#

idk

#

😭

long oracle
#

Well think about it, if the normal of D is pointing downwards and we know that the vector field is flowing outwards

#

It has to be negative

#

Since we are calculating the flux for D from bottom to top

fathom jewel
#

hmm ok

long oracle
#

But the ceiling is pointing against that

#

According to how you described D atleast

#

Draw some pictures

#

It really helps

fathom jewel
#

I did

long oracle
#

Could you share?

fathom jewel
#

ye

#

,,\iint_R \vec{v} = \iint_B \vec{v} + \iint_D \vec{v} = \iiint_K \text{div}(\vec{v})

long oracle
#

This is how im interpreting it right now

flat frigateBOT
#

š”ødωnš“²Ā²s

long oracle
#

We know the vector field is flowing outwards becuase of Phi_R being positive

fathom jewel
#

ok

long oracle
#

and here R is closed, and D has no floor

fathom jewel
#

YEA

fathom jewel
long oracle
#

But Phi_D has to be negative

#

no?

fathom jewel
#

yea

#

it'S -45pi

long oracle
#

Oh so this confirms it for you?

fathom jewel
#

no

long oracle
fathom jewel
long oracle
#

then we get D but pointing outwards

long oracle
fathom jewel
#

I am so dumb

long oracle
#

maybe its me being dumb here lmao