#help-23

1 messages · Page 236 of 1

polar iron
#

.reopen

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lean otter
#

Gotta find the derivative of the top function. Using chain rule I got to the solution at the bottom, but I'm not sure how to simplify it further.

lean otter
#

Wait, just realized I can put it into this. Now I'm stuck

safe radishBOT
#

@lean otter Has your question been resolved?

untold anchor
#

going back to the second step you can put the derivative of the inside function as a fraction to make it simpler

#

@lean otter

lean otter
#

I'm not sure I follow

untold anchor
#

this is the derivative of 1/sqrt(v)

lean otter
#

I pretty much already have that

untold anchor
#

yeah then you just multiply the denominators straight across

#

you can multiply the v^-3/2 by what’s inside the square root

#

or v^3/2 i mean

#

if that makes sense

lean otter
#

I don't quite follow

untold anchor
lean otter
#

Oh, whoops

untold anchor
#

and you can turn it into a radical

#

to then simplify further

lean otter
#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @wanton solar

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

slow merlin
#

hi

safe radishBOT
lean otter
#

post ur question

#

@slow merlin

safe radishBOT
#

@slow merlin Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @slow merlin

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

naive shoal
#

does any one know how to approach this

safe radishBOT
tender meteor
#

Where Is the problem?

ionic nest
#

for lim f(xn) u can use l'hopital rule

tender meteor
#

@naive shoal

naive shoal
#

lim n tends to infinity xn is zero..is that right

ionic nest
#

no it should be 1

#

or

#

no ur right

naive shoal
#

lim n tends to infinity sin(1/xn) does not exist right? as it oscillates between -1 and 1

ionic nest
#

cant you rewrite sin as

#

ok what about this

#

1/n (pi/2)

#

will be 0

#

as 1/inf =0

#

sin(0)=1

#

yeah

#

and then lim xn will be 0

naive shoal
#

sin (1/xn)

ionic nest
#

1st one is 0, 2nd one is 1, 3rd one is 0

#

wait no last one is different

#

3rd one will go to infinity

naive shoal
#

sin (npi/2) as n approaches infinity

ionic nest
#

that one goes goes to 1

#

its 1/n*pi/2

naive shoal
#

sin(1/xn)

#

thats sin (npi/2) isnt it

ionic nest
#

xn= 1/n*pi/2

#

oh ur right

#

yeah inf

naive shoal
#

so, whats the limit of sin (1/xn) here?

ionic nest
#

inf

naive shoal
#

no

ionic nest
#

oh i see ur question

#

u might need to use squeeze theorem

#

the answer would be

#

-1=<sin(npi/2)<=1

#

like that i suppose

naive shoal
#

yes, i was confused there

#

i thought sin (npi/2) doesnt have a limit as it oscillates

ionic nest
#

its been a while since i did this but im pretty sure you just use squeeze

#

for those cases

naive shoal
#

dont we use that for calculating lim f(x) ?

#

can any one else help..

#

let me repost the question here

ocean crypt
#

Hello

#

What Is the problem

naive shoal
#

My thoughts are..the answer to question 1 is zero because we have zero in the denominator

ocean crypt
#

So

naive shoal
#

the answer to question 2 is "does not exist" as sin oscillates between -1 and 1

#

is that correct

ocean crypt
#

$x_{n}=\frac{2}{n×pi}$

naive shoal
#

2/(npi)..right?

ocean crypt
#

Yes

#

So

#

What happens if you do the limit?

flat frigateBOT
naive shoal
#

zero is the answer..right?

ocean crypt
#

Yes

#

This Is the question Number 1

naive shoal
#

yes

ocean crypt
#

Why is it 0?

naive shoal
#

for question 1?

ocean crypt
#

Yes

naive shoal
#

its zero because as n approaches inf in the denominator, the limit tends to zero

#

no?

ocean crypt
#

Yes

#

$2/n*1/\pi$

flat frigateBOT
#

BobTheBuilder

ocean crypt
#

If the term on the left approaches 0

#

0 for a constant is 0

#

Right?

naive shoal
#

yes..iam clear abt question 1

ocean crypt
#

Ok

#

The 2 ?

naive shoal
#

limit does not exist for 2?

ocean crypt
#

Why?

naive shoal
#

letmme repost the question

#

sin oscillates between -1 and 1

#

thats why

ocean crypt
#

So it doesn't exist?

naive shoal
#

not sure...what r ur thoughts

ocean crypt
#

Suppose you rewrite the sin argument as above

#

$sin(2/n*1/\pi)$

flat frigateBOT
#

BobTheBuilder

naive shoal
#

sin (npi/2)

ocean crypt
#

If the term on the left approaches 0

#

What is the limit

naive shoal
#

can we apply limit law like this ?

#

yes..sin (npi/2)

ocean crypt
#

Let's try another way maybe it's more understandable

flat frigateBOT
ocean crypt
#

We said that question 1, the limit was 0

#

I know

naive shoal
#

sin (1/xn)

#

not sin (xn)

#

isnt it

ocean crypt
#

$\epsilon_{n}=0$

flat frigateBOT
#

BobTheBuilder

ocean crypt
#

This is the limit of xn

#

You know

#

$\frac{sin(\epsilon_{n})}{\epsilon_{n}}=1$

flat frigateBOT
#

BobTheBuilder

ocean crypt
#

You know this ??

naive shoal
#

does the above resemble question 2 that we are looking at?

ocean crypt
#

Wdym

naive shoal
#

sin(npi/2) as n approaches inf...isnt it?

ocean crypt
#

You do not have to calculate this limit

tender meteor
#

,w Limit[Sin[2/nπ],n->∞]

ocean crypt
#

You have to make this limit with n and π in the denominator

naive shoal
#

sin (npi/2) not sin (2/npi)

#

because thats sin (1/xn) not sin (xn)

tender meteor
#

,w Limit[Sin[nπ/2],n->∞]

ocean crypt
#

But why do you have to do this?

naive shoal
#

yes...thats what iam saying

tender meteor
#

I wasn't following the discussion

ocean crypt
#

Oh yes....

naive shoal
#

lim n tends to inf sin (npi/2) doesnt exist

ocean crypt
#

Yes

tender meteor
naive shoal
#

i feel bad aby myself 🙂

#

am i missing something

tender meteor
#

Why?

naive shoal
#

whats the answer to question 2

tender meteor
#

Doesn't Wolfram say exactly what you're saying? If yes, then you're done

ocean crypt
#

Do you need to justify your answer?

naive shoal
#

yes

ocean crypt
#

Ok

#

So

naive shoal
#

i can just say..limit does not exist because sin value oscillated between -1 and 1 ?

flat frigateBOT
naive shoal
#

yes thx

#

lets proceed to question 3

ocean crypt
#

You could also write that it doesn't meet the definition of limit

#

Maybe even demonstrate it

tender meteor
ocean crypt
#

And make it the limit

#

$\frac{n\pi}{2}*sin(\frac{n\pi}{2})$

flat frigateBOT
#

BobTheBuilder

naive shoal
#

yes

ocean crypt
#

So ?

tender meteor
ocean crypt
#

How much is the limit?

naive shoal
#

again it comes indeterminate?

ocean crypt
#

Meaning what?

naive shoal
#

its of this form lim x sin x as x tends to inf isnt it?

tender meteor
naive shoal
#

we are referring to the last part of the question

tender meteor
#

Okay

ocean crypt
#

Are you saying that the limit doesn't exist?

naive shoal
#

hmmm..not sure...confused

tender meteor
#

,w Limit[nπ/2Sin[nπ/2],n->∞]

naive shoal
#

doesnt exist..right?

tender meteor
#

Nop

ocean crypt
#

The sin does not admit limits

#

The left side goes to infinity

#

It cannot be solved in any way

naive shoal
#

cant be solved..means ...does not exist?

ocean crypt
#

Mmm

#

Yes

naive shoal
#

hmm...the answer to first question is zero and the other two..doesnt exist?

ocean crypt
#

Yes

tender meteor
ocean crypt
#

The last limit

naive shoal
#

limit means a point to which sequence converges

ocean crypt
#

Suppose the limit was something like: n^5/f(xn)

#

How much would the limit be?

naive shoal
#

we have to apply lhosptal?

#

not sure

ocean crypt
#

It could go well

#

No

#

Wait

tender meteor
ocean crypt
#

Does the limit comply with the conditions for using the hospital?

tender meteor
#

@ocean crypt What does this mean?

naive shoal
#

no doesnt

ocean crypt
#

So how is it solved?

naive shoal
#

there the product rule is applied

tender meteor
#

If you mean sin(n) then

#

,w Limit[n^5/Sin[n],n->∞]

naive shoal
#

hmm..

#

lets wind up this question

ocean crypt
#

Why can't it be done?

naive shoal
#

0, doesnt exist and doesnt exist..right?

ocean crypt
#

?

naive shoal
#

i mean the original question..

ocean crypt
#

But that would be the domain

#

The x cannot be 0

#

D:(-∞,+∞) With the exception of {0}

#

D=domain

tender meteor
#

@naive shoal

#

Maybe crashed

naive shoal
#

what?

#

so, are my answers correct

#

0, doesnt exist and doesnt exist

tender meteor
#

The justifications or the resolution of the limits?

#

Or both

naive shoal
#

the answers

tender meteor
#

It wasn't very clear

ocean crypt
#

There are correct

tender meteor
#

Anyway Yes

naive shoal
#

i shall provide the justifications in the assignment..

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @naive shoal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

crisp sluice
safe radishBOT
tight void
crisp sluice
#

i am confused abt the red point separate from the lines

tight void
#

what have you done so far

tight void
#

while closed dot means it is

#

so F(-1) would not be 0 but rather would be ___

crisp sluice
#

oh aight so thats 1 then no?

#

what abt f(1) from left side if lines ends with open dot

safe radishBOT
#

@crisp sluice Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

pallid flare
safe radishBOT
pallid flare
#

im confused on how he goes from 4/x -1 to (4-x)/x

#

the second to third line

fallen grotto
#

turn -1 to -x/x

clever ridge
#

is that calc 2?

fallen grotto
#

end of precalc/beginning of calc 1

clever ridge
#

woah that is way harder then what im doing

#

and i just started calc 1

tender meteor
flat frigateBOT
pallid flare
#

ok i think i get it

safe radishBOT
#

@pallid flare Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @pallid flare

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

graceful mantle
#

The cost of 2 footballs and 3 tennis balls is £21.73. The cost of 5 footballs and 7 tennis balls is £53.20.

Work out the cost of

a) a football.

b) a tennis ball.

light crypt
#

Use systems of equations

#

You know how to do that?

lean otter
#

2 ways of doing it

#
  1. The primary school way (the baby method)
  2. Algebra
#

Oh wait nvm

#

I haven’t don’t this since P6

#

Done*

#

Ok I got it

#

53.20-21.73-21.73

#

You’ll get the cost of 1 of each

#

Then you probably work from there

#

Please forgive me, it has been years since I’ve done this

light crypt
lean otter
#

Bc you minus 4 footballs and 6 tennis balls

light crypt
#

That isn’t 21.73

#

😭

#

@graceful mantle what’ve you tried so far?

graceful mantle
#

I don’t even know where to start

#

None of it makes sense to me

#

Oh wait no

#

I get it

light crypt
#

All good then?

graceful mantle
#

Nvm

#

I got the total of 1 football and 1 tennis ball

#

But how do I know how much each is?

light crypt
#

Walk me through what you did

graceful mantle
#

53.2 - 21.73 - 21.73 = 9.74

#

Which is one football and one tennis ball

#

Ohhhhh

#

Do I make it into a ratio?

#

Wait no

#

That doesn’t work

light crypt
#

Completely disregard that

#

What two equations can you make from the information given?

graceful mantle
#

7 footballs and 10 tennis balls = 74.93

#

And

#

3 footballs and 4 tennis balls = 31.47

light crypt
#

There's a much simpler set of equations already available

#

2 footballs + 3 tennis balls = 21.73 and 5 footballs and 7 tennis balls = 53.20

#

For the sake of making it easier to read, we can say "Let x be footballs" and "Let y be tennis balls"

#

So, 2x + 3y = 21.73

#

and, 5x + 7y = 53.20

graceful mantle
#

What do I do from there tho?

light crypt
#

You have two options from here, you can do substitution or elimination

#

Do you know how to do either?

graceful mantle
#

No

light crypt
#

Alright, I'll take you through both then, is that okay?

graceful mantle
#

Yes that would be nice

#

Thank you

light crypt
#

Alright, perfect

#

So, to do substitution, we need to isolate a variable

#

Which one do you want to isolate?

graceful mantle
#

Which ever one is least complex

light crypt
#

Neither one will be too complex

#

Let's go with x

graceful mantle
#

Alr

light crypt
#

For 2x + 3y = 21.73, what would x be when isolated?

graceful mantle
#

2x = 21.73 - 3y

light crypt
#

Yep, you'd just need to divide it by 2 to completely isolate it

#

So x = (21.73 -3y) / 2

#

Now that we know what x is in terms of y, we can substitute x into the other equation, 5x + 7y = 53.20

#

What do you think that would be?

graceful mantle
#

((21.73 - 3y) / 2) x 5 + 7y = 53.2

light crypt
#

Yep! Now that you have only one variable you're able to solve for y

#

That's substitution

graceful mantle
#

Ohhh I think I get it

light crypt
#

So what would y be then?

graceful mantle
#

Uhm

#

I don’t know how I would finish it

#

I thought I could just put it in a calculator but that doesn’t work

light crypt
#

No worries

#

I'll write down the steps for you

graceful mantle
#

I think I get it

light crypt
#

Alright

#

Elimination time?

graceful mantle
#

I guess so

#

Thank you for your help

light crypt
#

np

graceful mantle
#

Lemme try this before we start

#

Gimme one sec

light crypt
#

Alright, lmk when

graceful mantle
#

Alright let’s start elimination

light crypt
#

Alrighty

#

So, for elimination, we take our two equations and choose which term we want to get rid of

#

Want to do y this time?

graceful mantle
#

Alright

light crypt
#

Alright

#

So we have

#

2x + 3y = 21.73

#

5x + 7y = 53.20

#

Looking at x, we need to find a number that when we subtract the two equations, x will become 0

#

what can we multiply both equations by to get them at the same number?

#

Actually, let's do x again, it'll be simpler

graceful mantle
#

Ok

#

First equation by 5 second by 2

light crypt
#

Exactly

graceful mantle
#

Both x’s become 10

light crypt
#

So we would get

#

10x + 15y = 108.65

#

10x + 14y = 106.4

graceful mantle
#

Then we minus them?

light crypt
#

Now we just need to subtract the bottom from the top

light crypt
graceful mantle
#

So 2.25

light crypt
#

Yep! And we can see that both methods gave us the same value for y

graceful mantle
#

Or y = 2.25

#

Elimination is much easier

light crypt
#

Now after finding one of the values, all we do is substitute it back into either original equation to get our x

light crypt
#

It's still good to know both but I hate using substitution for linear systems

graceful mantle
#

It is hard

light crypt
#

Agreed

graceful mantle
#

I’m going to stick to elimination unless the criculem requires otherwise

light crypt
#

Yeah, hopefully they don't ask you to use it specifically

#

Although it's good to build algebraic skills like that

graceful mantle
#

Agreed

light crypt
#

All good then?

graceful mantle
#

Yes

#

Thank you so much for your help

light crypt
#

Np

graceful mantle
#

It means a lot

light crypt
#

No worries

#

Don't forget to use .close to close the channel

graceful mantle
#

Yes

#

I will

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @graceful mantle

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lean otter
#

Hello, I was wondering if I could get some help with this binomial expansion question

lean otter
tardy pivot
#

worth memorising this one:

lean otter
#

So, I changed it to 1+x(1-x)^-1 and expanded out (1-x)^-1 and then times the 3 terms but 1+x but got the wrong answer

lean otter
tardy pivot
lean otter
#

Yes

#

I got 1,x,x^2

#

Then I got:

1+x,x+x^2,x^2+x^3

tardy pivot
#

then collect like terms

#

to get 1 + 2x + 2x^2 + 2x^3 ...

lean otter
#

Ah didn’t know that was a thing 😂

#

Thank you

tardy pivot
#

imma sleep now

#

gl

lean otter
#

Thank you

tardy pivot
#

no prob

lean otter
#

Sleep well

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sweet swallow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dire sedge
safe radishBOT
dire sedge
#

how to do part d

#

it says $x'(t)=8t-t^2$ and $y'(t)=-t+\sqrt{t^{1.2}+20}$.

flat frigateBOT
lavish scaffold
# dire sedge

what does "moving towards the x-axis" mean mathematically in this case

lavish scaffold
#

why y?

dire sedge
lavish scaffold
#

you mean x then

dire sedge
lavish scaffold
#

y is decreasing

dire sedge
lavish scaffold
#

i think they mean the top right part of the plane

safe radishBOT
#

@dire sedge Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

earnest needle
#

Please tell me if the following derivation is correct. I'm new to derivatives so I'm afraid of making mistakes. Thank you.

We know that $\lim_{x->0} \dfrac{sinx}{x} = 1$
So does $\lim_{dr->0} sindr=dr$

Also does $\lim_{dr->0} cos(r+dr)=cos(r)$

hard crest
#

use \lim

flat frigateBOT
#

EphemeralEuphoria

hard crest
#

i'm not even sure if this really makes sense as a statement (i don't think it does) but no, $\lim_{dr\to0} \sin dr = 0$

flat frigateBOT
#

hayley table

safe radishBOT
#

Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).

hard crest
#

yeah no it just doesn't make sense tbh

#

you need two variables involved for d* to make sense, that's why we have like dy/dx

earnest needle
hard crest
#

yes.... with some hesitation

#

dx is an infinitesimal, you can think of this as "the smallest positive number"

#

i don't think it makes sense to take the limit as dr goes to 0

earnest needle
#

I don't really understand how dx can't be intepret as $\lim_(x->0). Can you explain more since smallest number seems to be the same as approaching 0?

hard crest
#

i said i don't think it makes sense to take the limit as dx goes to 0

earnest needle
#

Oh sorry, so do you mean the part sindx=dx is wrong?

hard crest
#

yeah that just doesn't make sense to me

#

what are you trying to do with these?

safe radishBOT
#

@earnest needle Has your question been resolved?

earnest needle
flat frigateBOT
#

EphemeralEuphoria

safe radishBOT
#

@earnest needle Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#

@earnest needle Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#

@earnest needle Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

proven fern
safe radishBOT
proven fern
#

for part ii can i use angle between 2 lines formula

#

but how do i get the slope of f-x-

worthy estuary
#

Derivative of f(x) at B

#

But since it is a parabola

#

U can also find the average rate of change

#

Around that point

#

With x values that are the same distance from B's x value

proven fern
#

would it not be at the derivative at point B BC thats where the basket is

worthy estuary
#

Oh ye

safe radishBOT
#

@proven fern Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @proven fern

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

grim plover
safe radishBOT
grim plover
#

,rccw

flat frigateBOT
grim plover
#

Q11, I got a few equations, but idk what to do with them to get something useful

#

(just substituted the corresponding zeroes in their equations)

river field
#

Either I'm blind or I don't see a Q11

spiral imp
#

Yeah I was also confused, I think they mean q5 lol

grim plover
grim plover
river field
#

well you have a system of 4 equations and 4 unknowns so it's technically solvable

#

but like

grim plover
#

U aren't supposed to solve it

river field
#

try to remember some way you can rewrite quadratic

grim plover
#

Ur supposed to manipulate the equations to get something

river field
#

in terms of their zeroes

grim plover
river field
#

Hint : ax^2 + bx + c = a * (x - x_1) * (x - x_2)

#

uh

#

fixed

grim plover
#

Ye i remember

#

Alright got it

#

Tyvm

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @grim plover

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

pulsar zealot
#

Could anyone help me with the integration of ln(x-4)

pseudo scroll
#

Integrate by parts

pulsar zealot
#

Yeh I’ve tried but it’s kinda hard

pseudo scroll
#

It's alright we'll try it again

#

What did you choose to integrate and differentiate?

pulsar zealot
#

That’s where I got stuck

#

I tried a bunch of options but none of them worked out

summer crow
pulsar zealot
#

I set u as x-4 and v as lnu

summer crow
#

wait so you let u = x-4, meaning ln(x-4) = ln(u), and then you let v = ln(u). Then you tried to differentiate u and integrate v? That's not integration by parts..

#

Hint: $\ln(x-4) = 1 \cdot \ln(x-4)$, can you now guess what to differentiate and integrate?

flat frigateBOT
pulsar zealot
#

Wait so what was I doing then

summer crow
#

oh ok

pulsar zealot
#

I get now that u = ln(x-4) and v is 1

summer crow
#

what did you get

#

right

pulsar zealot
summer crow
pulsar zealot
#

1/x-4 and x

#

I think I’m fine from here

summer crow
pulsar zealot
#

Thanks for the help

safe radishBOT
#

@pulsar zealot Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

slow flax
#

Elsa and Victoria each picked 600 rose bushes. Elsa worked for two hours longer than Victoria because she picked 15 fewer rose bushes per hour. How many hours did Elsa work, and how many hours did Victoria work?

i am not sure how to get to an answer.

slow flax
#

i am guessing the table looks somewhat like this, but i am not sure what numbers to input

safe radishBOT
#

@slow flax Has your question been resolved?

slow flax
#

figured out more and turned out like this

safe radishBOT
#

@slow flax Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#

@slow flax Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @slow flax

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

tardy oar
#

after reducing how did we get that matrix?

safe radishBOT
granite idol
#

have you carried out the operations?

tardy oar
#

i watched this video and he wrote this matrix immediately

granite idol
#

the answer to "how" is "by row reduction"

tardy oar
#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @tardy oar

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

trim carbon
safe radishBOT
trim carbon
#

does this symbol mean the number has to be a positive real number?

#

or just any real number

granite idol
#

yes

trim carbon
#

which one?

lone arch
#

first

trim carbon
#

oh ok tysm!

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @trim carbon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lean otter
safe radishBOT
lean otter
#

Any help would be much appreciated

#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sweet swallow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

ivory flame
#

Yep

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @fair shore

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

rustic goblet
#

yes, I believe so

#

oh wait

#

you have to check that the inner product of p with t is 0, and that the inner product of p with k is 0

#

it can’t just be either of them

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @lone arch

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

rustic goblet
#

oh I was about to construct a counterexample lol

#

but seems like you got it

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

pearl falcon
#

hello

safe radishBOT
pearl falcon
#

how do you get the estimated value of 'y' in linear regressions

#

thats the paper and i think i know how to do the others im just not sure on how to get the expected y value

safe radishBOT
#

@pearl falcon Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#

@pearl falcon Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @pearl falcon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

plain sage
safe radishBOT
plain sage
#

<@&286206848099549185>

final halo
#

one idea: you can see how the shaded area can be broken up into a big square and then a triangle on each side

plain sage
#

yep i tried doing that

#

however my answer was 11a

#

i think i did something wrong when calculating the length of the triangles

sterile tapir
#

Can you show your work of the triangles length?

plain sage
#

so since each side is a, i used pythagoras for this isoceles and this square root a^2+ a^2 to get 2a as the bottom length of the triangle

sterile tapir
#

$$\sqrt{a^2+a^2} \Rightarrow \sqrt{2a^2}$$

flat frigateBOT
sterile tapir
#

so

flat frigateBOT
sterile tapir
#

that should be the length right

plain sage
#

ooo thank youu

#

and then do i use the normal area of a triangle rule

sterile tapir
#

Yeah

plain sage
#

okk thank you!

sterile tapir
#

Your welcome good luck!

safe radishBOT
#

@plain sage Has your question been resolved?

plain sage
#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @plain sage

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lean otter
safe radishBOT
lean otter
#

I'm stuck on the left side, but I have the following:

#

Then when I plug that in

#

Does this all look right so far?

#

<@&286206848099549185> I am stuck, could someome please help?

fathom jewel
lean otter
#

how so?

fathom jewel
# lean otter

Imagine $z = \frac{b}{x_p}$ then $\frac{1}{z\ln(10)} \cdot -z \cdot \frac{1}{x_p}$

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
#

Is that more clearer?

lean otter
#

This is what I ended up getting

#

so something cancels there?

fathom jewel
#

hold on

lean otter
#

wait

#

would it have cancelled here

fathom jewel
#

yea

#

if you flip b/x_p

lean otter
#

ah ok

#

Let me do that real quick

fathom jewel
#

,,\dd x_p = -\frac{\ln(10)}{x_p} \dd u

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

yep i see that now

#

i wonder if that ends up doing anything in the final answer though

#

the initial condition is x_p(0)=1

fathom jewel
#

Let's see

fathom jewel
# lean otter

Also wouldn ya end up with a constant C on the right after integration?

lean otter
#

Aha

#

Yes, right?

fathom jewel
#

yea

fathom jewel
lean otter
#

i have that

fathom jewel
#

okoko

lean otter
#

xD

#

sorry i may have not put it in everything

fathom jewel
#

it's fine

lean otter
#

hmmmmm

fathom jewel
#

wait

lean otter
#

did i do something wrong maybe

fathom jewel
#

no me

#

hold on

fathom jewel
lean otter
#

and how would that affect what i did

#

is z like another u sub or

fathom jewel
#

,,\dd u = -\frac{1}{\ln(10)x_p} \dd x_p \iff \dd x_p = -\ln(10)x_p \dd u

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

yes

fathom jewel
#

oh right

#

,,-\ln(10) \int \frac{1}{u} \dd u = at + C

lean otter
#

-ln(10)?

fathom jewel
#

yes

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
lean otter
#

ok so -ln(10) * ln | u | = at + C

#

and plug u back in

fathom jewel
#

yea

fathom jewel
lean otter
#

yep

fathom jewel
#

x_p(0) = 1

#

so x_p is a function of

lean otter
#

and if I have the initial condition of

fathom jewel
#

x_p = 1

#

but what is 0

lean otter
#

not sure

fathom jewel
#

HUH

#

I would guess t

lean otter
#

well a and t are constant

fathom jewel
#

seems like a differential equation

lean otter
#

it is a differential equation

fathom jewel
lean otter
#

well let me try t as one

fathom jewel
#

no

#

x_p = 1

lean otter
#

and t = 0

fathom jewel
#

if x_p(t)

#

yes

lean otter
#

let me try that

#

and see if it gets me the answer

fathom jewel
#

then you would get something in terms of b for C

lean otter
#

yes

#

i need to solve for C

#

and plug back in

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
#

yea haha

lean otter
#

now plug that back in

fathom jewel
#

,,- \ln (10) \cdot \ln \abs{\log_{10}\left ( \frac{b}{x_p} \right )} = at - \ln (10) \cdot \ln \abs{\log_{10}(b)}

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

uh

#

that looks nasty

fathom jewel
#

yea

#

but x_p(t) seems to make the most sense

lean otter
#

this was the original

fathom jewel
lean otter
#

and x_p(t) = b^(1-e^-at)

#

that is what i need to get

fathom jewel
fathom jewel
lean otter
#

how do we do that stare

fathom jewel
#

divide by -ln10

#

then apply e

lean otter
#

so they cancel

#

the -ln(10)?

fathom jewel
#

ye

#

,,\abs{\log_{10}\left ( \frac{b}{x_p} \right )} = e^{-\frac{at}{\ln(10)}} \cdot \abs{\log_{10}(b)}

#

oh no

#

forogto

lean otter
#

what]

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

wait

#

-ln(10) cancels i thought

fathom jewel
#

yes

#

with the other

#

it's a sum

#

at - ln(10) * log...

lean otter
#

ok

#

ok

#

now that we are here... should we rewrite something?

fathom jewel
#

I think we dont need the absolute values

lean otter
#

nah

fathom jewel
#

because of the condiition

lean otter
#

since it's going to be positive anyways

#

yeah

fathom jewel
#

then i would subtract the left

#

,,\log_{10}(b) - \log_{10}(x_p) = e^{-\frac{at}{\ln(10)}} \cdot \log_{10}(b)

lean otter
#

ah yes yes

fathom jewel
#

non nvm

lean otter
#

wait

#

-e?

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
#

I applied log(a/b) = loga - logb

lean otter
#

yep

fathom jewel
#

,,\log_{10}(x_p) = \log_{10}(b) - e^{-\frac{at}{\ln(10)}} \cdot \log_{10}(b) = \log_{10}(b) \left (1- e^{-\frac{at}{\ln(10)}} \right )

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
#

Apply 10^(...)

#

,,x_p = 10^{\log_{10}(b) \left (1- e^{-\frac{at}{\ln(10)}} \right )}

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

so log(10) and 10 cancel?

fathom jewel
#

yes kinda

lean otter
#

lg10 is just 1

#

what

fathom jewel
#

we have 10^(ab)

lean otter
#

correct

fathom jewel
#

,,x_p = \left ( 10^{\log_{10}(b)} \right )^{\left (1- e^{-\frac{at}{\ln(10)}} \right )}

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
#

so now it cancels

lean otter
#

ok

fathom jewel
#

,,x_p = b^{\left (1- e^{-\frac{at}{\ln(10)}} \right )}

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

hip hip hooray

fathom jewel
#

really?

lean otter
#

except

#

ln(10)

fathom jewel
lean otter
#

it shouldnt be there

#

according to them

fathom jewel
#

hahahaha

#

maybe log was ln all along

lean otter
#

hm?

fathom jewel
#

not log_10

#

but log_e

lean otter
#

uh

#

how do i fix that

fathom jewel
lean otter
#

lol

#

so uh

#

how to fix that then

#

do we have to go back

fathom jewel
# lean otter

if it was ln(...) = u then we wouldn't have ln(10)

lean otter
#

in this

fathom jewel
fathom jewel
lean otter
#

BRUH

fathom jewel
#

stupid author

#

otherwise our steps were valid

lean otter
#

i am so pissed

fathom jewel
#

how come we come so close

lean otter
#

so just replace everything with ln now?

fathom jewel
#

and differ by some factor

#

no not quiet

#

Let's do the trick quickly

lean otter
#

ok

fathom jewel
#

,,u = \ln \frac{b}{x_p} \implies \dd u = \frac{1}{\frac{b}{x_p}} \cdot -\frac{b}{x_p^2} \dd x

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
#

So we end up with $\dd u = -\frac{1}{x_p} \dd x \iff \dd x = -x_p \dd u$

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
#

So imagine

#

We substitute

#

Imagine we do all steps instead with -ln(10) we do it with (-1) only

#

So yea

#

we should get to their solution doing so

lean otter
#

WHY WOULD THEY NOT HAVE STATED THAT FIRST

#

AHHHHH

fathom jewel
#

then we would have e^(-at) ...

fathom jewel
flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
#

but it was a quick fix

#

the math is mathing

lean otter
#

wait

#

so let me show you

fathom jewel
#

which is pretty rare in such occasions

lean otter
#

wait

fathom jewel
#

Honestly if you gave the solutions with ln(10) then your prof should have take away points from himself lmao

lean otter
#

so the left side was just 1/u

fathom jewel
#

all steps are similiar

#

we just differ by some factor

#

replace it ln(10) = 1

#

haha looks wrong

#

ln(10) to 1

lean otter
fathom jewel
#

yea

lean otter
#

then exponentiate

fathom jewel
#

yea

#

also

#

did you realize

#

whehter we did it before or after

#

we got it right

#

with the constant C

lean otter
#

wdym sorry my brain is fried rn

fathom jewel
#

You want first to solve for x_p

#

which is fine

#

previously we first evaluated C and then solved x_p

lean otter
#

so dont exponentiate yet

fathom jewel
#

both would work

fathom jewel
lean otter
#

are you talking about before

#

when we assumed the base was 10

#

instead of e

fathom jewel
#

yes

lean otter
#

ah ok

fathom jewel
#

we first evaluated the constant

#

then solved for x_p

#

now we doing it backwards

#

my point

#

both work

#

just as a note

lean otter
#

so now we solving for C

#

firwst

#

first

fathom jewel
#

I would actually solve for x_p

lean otter
#

oh?

fathom jewel
#

yea

lean otter
#

so then is becomes

fathom jewel
#

because solving for C first usually results to lengthier terms

#

like previously

#

haha

lean otter
fathom jewel
#

But first I would multiply by (-1)

#

no

lean otter
#

wah

#

wuhhhhhhhh

fathom jewel
#

,,\ln \abs{\ln \left ( \frac{b}{x_p} \right ) } = -at - C

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

why no negative

#

OH

#

you multiply by negative 1

fathom jewel
#

you really fried haha

lean otter
#

it would be + C regardless though

#

right

fathom jewel
#

now let's e^(...)

lean otter
#

at least that's what my teacher says

fathom jewel
#

,,\ln \left ( \frac{b}{x_p} \right ) = e^{-at - C}

fathom jewel
lean otter
#

xD

fathom jewel
#

your teacher screwed us already once

lean otter
#

LMAO

fathom jewel
#

might aswell leave the abs

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

hmmm now we plugin x_p(0) = 1

#

so plugin 0 for a and 1 in for x_p?

fathom jewel
#

Now you wanna solve mid way for C 😂

lean otter
#

wuhhhhhhhhhh

fathom jewel
#

,,\ln(b) - \ln(x_p) = e^{-at - C}

lean otter
#

never heard of that

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

yes

fathom jewel
#

yea you're fried lmao

lean otter
#

bye

#

that was too easy

#

why i not say that

fathom jewel
#

yea

#

I am seeing things

lean otter
#

now we plugin? 🥺

fathom jewel
#

let's solve for x_p first

lean otter
#

or sh ould be add term over first

fathom jewel
#

haha

lean otter
#

ye

fathom jewel
#

get it to x_p = ...

#

,,\ln(x_p) = \ln(b) - e^{-at - C}

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

correct

fathom jewel
#

Now the same bs as before 🥱

lean otter
#

but but but

fathom jewel
#

,,x_p = e^{\ln(b) - e^{-at - C}}

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

yes exponenitate

#

i cant spell

fathom jewel
#

e^(a+b) = e^a * e^b

lean otter
#

now plugin happy

fathom jewel
#

,,x_p = e^{\ln(b)}\cdot e^{ - e^{-at - C}}

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
#

let us finish

lean otter
#

e^1

#

wait wtf

#

poor C so high up

fathom jewel
#

hahaha

#

fine let's plug in

lean otter
#

YAY

fathom jewel
#

,,1 = e^{\ln(b)}\cdot e^{ - e^{- C}} = e^{\ln(b) - e^{- C}}

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
#

We can write as 1 = e^0 and compare exponents

#

,,e^0 = e^{\ln(b) - e^{- C}} \implies 0 = \ln(b) - e^{- C}

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
#

,,\implies e^{-C} = \ln(b) \iff C = -\ln (\ln (b))

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
#

So

lean otter
#

NOW WE PLUGIN C

fathom jewel
#

,,x_p = e^{\ln(b)}\cdot e^{ - e^{-at + \ln (\ln (b))}}

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

hmmmm

#

i see two ln(b))

fathom jewel
#

,,x_p = b \cdot e^{ - e^{-at} e^{\ln (\ln (b))} }

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

twa

fathom jewel
#

yea

#

,,x_p = b \cdot e^{ - e^{-at} \ln(b) }

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

wait

#

where that e come from

fathom jewel
#

power rules

lean otter
#

i thought e^ln(b) cancels to just b

fathom jewel
#

,, e^{a+b} = e^a \cdot e^b

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
lean otter
#

oh wait no i see it now

fathom jewel
#

,,x_p = b \cdot \left (e^{\ln(b) } \right )^{-e^{-at}}

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

lean otter
#

power rule again, right?

fathom jewel
#

yes

lean otter
#

then they cancel

#

the ln(b) and e

#

right

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
#

,,x_p = b \cdot b^{-e^{-at}}

lean otter
#

so switch

flat frigateBOT
#

𝔸dωn𝓲²s

fathom jewel
#

Last step is up to you :) Dinkelberg

lean otter
#

BYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

#

like bases

fathom jewel
#

I was your biggest comeback

lean otter
#

😝

fathom jewel
lean otter
#

so

#

x_p = b^1-e^(-at)

#

PERIOD