#help-23
1 messages · Page 236 of 1
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Gotta find the derivative of the top function. Using chain rule I got to the solution at the bottom, but I'm not sure how to simplify it further.
Wait, just realized I can put it into this. Now I'm stuck
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
going back to the second step you can put the derivative of the inside function as a fraction to make it simpler
@lean otter
I'm not sure I follow
I pretty much already have that
yeah then you just multiply the denominators straight across
you can multiply the v^-3/2 by what’s inside the square root
or v^3/2 i mean
if that makes sense
I don't quite follow
in this picture you don’t need the negative in the v^-3/2
Oh, whoops
.close
Closed by @wanton solar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
@slow merlin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @slow merlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does any one know how to approach this
Where Is the problem?
for lim f(xn) u can use l'hopital rule
@naive shoal
lim n tends to infinity xn is zero..is that right
lim n tends to infinity sin(1/xn) does not exist right? as it oscillates between -1 and 1
cant you rewrite sin as
ok what about this
1/n (pi/2)
will be 0
as 1/inf =0
sin(0)=1
yeah
and then lim xn will be 0
sin (1/xn)
1st one is 0, 2nd one is 1, 3rd one is 0
wait no last one is different
3rd one will go to infinity
sin (npi/2) as n approaches infinity
so, whats the limit of sin (1/xn) here?
inf
no
oh i see ur question
u might need to use squeeze theorem
the answer would be
-1=<sin(npi/2)<=1
like that i suppose
yes, i was confused there
i thought sin (npi/2) doesnt have a limit as it oscillates
its been a while since i did this but im pretty sure you just use squeeze
for those cases
dont we use that for calculating lim f(x) ?
can any one else help..
let me repost the question here
My thoughts are..the answer to question 1 is zero because we have zero in the denominator
So
the answer to question 2 is "does not exist" as sin oscillates between -1 and 1
is that correct
$x_{n}=\frac{2}{n×pi}$
2/(npi)..right?
alee
zero is the answer..right?
yes
Why is it 0?
for question 1?
Yes
its zero because as n approaches inf in the denominator, the limit tends to zero
no?
BobTheBuilder
yes..iam clear abt question 1
limit does not exist for 2?
Why?
So it doesn't exist?
not sure...what r ur thoughts
BobTheBuilder
sin (npi/2)
Let's try another way maybe it's more understandable
alee
$\epsilon_{n}=0$
BobTheBuilder
BobTheBuilder
You know this ??
does the above resemble question 2 that we are looking at?
Wdym
sin(npi/2) as n approaches inf...isnt it?
You do not have to calculate this limit
,w Limit[Sin[2/nπ],n->∞]
You have to make this limit with n and π in the denominator
,w Limit[Sin[nπ/2],n->∞]
But why do you have to do this?
yes...thats what iam saying
I wasn't following the discussion
Oh yes....
lim n tends to inf sin (npi/2) doesnt exist
Yes
.
Why?
whats the answer to question 2
Doesn't Wolfram say exactly what you're saying? If yes, then you're done
Do you need to justify your answer?
yes
i can just say..limit does not exist because sin value oscillated between -1 and 1 ?
alee
You could also write that it doesn't meet the definition of limit
Maybe even demonstrate it
It's not clear to me what question 3 is
Instead of x you have to replace xn
And make it the limit
$\frac{n\pi}{2}*sin(\frac{n\pi}{2})$
BobTheBuilder
yes
So ?
.
How much is the limit?
again it comes indeterminate?
Meaning what?
its of this form lim x sin x as x tends to inf isnt it?
How do I answer, if I don't know what the question is, if you want a clear answer the question must be clear
Okay
Are you saying that the limit doesn't exist?
hmmm..not sure...confused
doesnt exist..right?
Nop
The sin does not admit limits
The left side goes to infinity
It cannot be solved in any way
cant be solved..means ...does not exist?
hmm...the answer to first question is zero and the other two..doesnt exist?
Yes
What is the definition of limit?
The last limit
limit means a point to which sequence converges
,w Limit[n^5/Sin[x],n->∞]
Does the limit comply with the conditions for using the hospital?
@ocean crypt What does this mean?
no doesnt
So how is it solved?
there the product rule is applied
Why can't it be done?
0, doesnt exist and doesnt exist..right?
?
i mean the original question..
But that would be the domain
The x cannot be 0
D:(-∞,+∞) With the exception of {0}
D=domain
the answers
These are the answers
It wasn't very clear
There are correct
Anyway Yes
Closed by @naive shoal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
well well well BeanSauce
i am confused abt the red point separate from the lines
what have you done so far
well open dot means that the function is not there at that point
while closed dot means it is
so F(-1) would not be 0 but rather would be ___
oh aight so thats 1 then no?
what abt f(1) from left side if lines ends with open dot
@crisp sluice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
turn -1 to -x/x
is that calc 2?
end of precalc/beginning of calc 1
Just put a common denominator
alee
ok i think i get it
@pallid flare Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pallid flare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The cost of 2 footballs and 3 tennis balls is £21.73. The cost of 5 footballs and 7 tennis balls is £53.20.
Work out the cost of
a) a football.
b) a tennis ball.
2 ways of doing it
- The primary school way (the baby method)
- Algebra
Oh wait nvm
I haven’t don’t this since P6
Done*
Ok I got it
53.20-21.73-21.73
You’ll get the cost of 1 of each
Then you probably work from there
Please forgive me, it has been years since I’ve done this
Wdym
Bc you minus 4 footballs and 6 tennis balls
I don’t even know where to start
None of it makes sense to me
Oh wait no
I get it
All good then?
Nvm
I got the total of 1 football and 1 tennis ball
But how do I know how much each is?
Walk me through what you did
53.2 - 21.73 - 21.73 = 9.74
Which is one football and one tennis ball
Ohhhhh
Do I make it into a ratio?
Wait no
That doesn’t work
Completely disregard that
What two equations can you make from the information given?
7 footballs and 10 tennis balls = 74.93
And
3 footballs and 4 tennis balls = 31.47
There's a much simpler set of equations already available
2 footballs + 3 tennis balls = 21.73 and 5 footballs and 7 tennis balls = 53.20
For the sake of making it easier to read, we can say "Let x be footballs" and "Let y be tennis balls"
So, 2x + 3y = 21.73
and, 5x + 7y = 53.20
What do I do from there tho?
You have two options from here, you can do substitution or elimination
Do you know how to do either?
No
Alright, I'll take you through both then, is that okay?
Alright, perfect
So, to do substitution, we need to isolate a variable
Which one do you want to isolate?
Which ever one is least complex
Alr
For 2x + 3y = 21.73, what would x be when isolated?
2x = 21.73 - 3y
Yep, you'd just need to divide it by 2 to completely isolate it
So x = (21.73 -3y) / 2
Now that we know what x is in terms of y, we can substitute x into the other equation, 5x + 7y = 53.20
What do you think that would be?
((21.73 - 3y) / 2) x 5 + 7y = 53.2
Yep! Now that you have only one variable you're able to solve for y
That's substitution
Ohhh I think I get it
So what would y be then?
Uhm
I don’t know how I would finish it
I thought I could just put it in a calculator but that doesn’t work
I think I get it
np
Alright, lmk when
Alright let’s start elimination
Alrighty
So, for elimination, we take our two equations and choose which term we want to get rid of
Want to do y this time?
Alright
Alright
So we have
2x + 3y = 21.73
5x + 7y = 53.20
Looking at x, we need to find a number that when we subtract the two equations, x will become 0
what can we multiply both equations by to get them at the same number?
Actually, let's do x again, it'll be simpler
Exactly
Both x’s become 10
Then we minus them?
Now we just need to subtract the bottom from the top
Yep!
So 2.25
Yep! And we can see that both methods gave us the same value for y
Now after finding one of the values, all we do is substitute it back into either original equation to get our x
100% 😭
It's still good to know both but I hate using substitution for linear systems
It is hard
Agreed
I’m going to stick to elimination unless the criculem requires otherwise
Yeah, hopefully they don't ask you to use it specifically
Although it's good to build algebraic skills like that
Agreed
All good then?
Np
It means a lot
Closed by @graceful mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I was wondering if I could get some help with this binomial expansion question
worth memorising this one:
So, I changed it to 1+x(1-x)^-1 and expanded out (1-x)^-1 and then times the 3 terms but 1+x but got the wrong answer
Thank you
when u expanded did ur terms match this one ^^?
Thank you
no prob
Closed by @sweet swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
mXd
what does "moving towards the x-axis" mean mathematically in this case
y is decreasing
why y?
cuz like moving toward the x-axis is horizontal motion
you mean x then
wait but x motion is like left to right
why does it say particle remains in the first quadrant
i think they mean the top right part of the plane
@dire sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please tell me if the following derivation is correct. I'm new to derivatives so I'm afraid of making mistakes. Thank you.
We know that $\lim_{x->0} \dfrac{sinx}{x} = 1$
So does $\lim_{dr->0} sindr=dr$
Also does $\lim_{dr->0} cos(r+dr)=cos(r)$
use \lim
EphemeralEuphoria
i'm not even sure if this really makes sense as a statement (i don't think it does) but no, $\lim_{dr\to0} \sin dr = 0$
hayley table
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
yeah no it just doesn't make sense tbh
you need two variables involved for d* to make sense, that's why we have like dy/dx
I mean like can I treat d* as a variable because it's just a part in the proof I'm trying to do?
yes.... with some hesitation
dx is an infinitesimal, you can think of this as "the smallest positive number"
i don't think it makes sense to take the limit as dr goes to 0
I don't really understand how dx can't be intepret as $\lim_(x->0). Can you explain more since smallest number seems to be the same as approaching 0?
that's not really what i said
i said i don't think it makes sense to take the limit as dx goes to 0
Oh sorry, so do you mean the part sindx=dx is wrong?
@earnest needle Has your question been resolved?
I want to prove $\dfrac{dx}{cosx}=\dfrac{sindx}{cos(x+dx)}$. Using trigonometry formula is pretty long so I wonder if I can just take "shortcut".
EphemeralEuphoria
@earnest needle Has your question been resolved?
@earnest needle Has your question been resolved?
@earnest needle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for part ii can i use angle between 2 lines formula
but how do i get the slope of f-x-
Derivative of f(x) at B
But since it is a parabola
U can also find the average rate of change
Around that point
With x values that are the same distance from B's x value
would it not be at the derivative at point B BC thats where the basket is
Oh ye
@proven fern Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @proven fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rccw
Q11, I got a few equations, but idk what to do with them to get something useful
(just substituted the corresponding zeroes in their equations)
Either I'm blind or I don't see a Q11
Yeah I was also confused, I think they mean q5 lol
Yes 💀
Yeah mb I meant q5
well you have a system of 4 equations and 4 unknowns so it's technically solvable
but like

U aren't supposed to solve it
try to remember some way you can rewrite quadratic
Ur supposed to manipulate the equations to get something
in terms of their zeroes
Hmm let me try that good idea
Closed by @grim plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could anyone help me with the integration of ln(x-4)
Integrate by parts
Yeh I’ve tried but it’s kinda hard
It's alright we'll try it again
What did you choose to integrate and differentiate?
what did you try
I set u as x-4 and v as lnu
wait so you let u = x-4, meaning ln(x-4) = ln(u), and then you let v = ln(u). Then you tried to differentiate u and integrate v? That's not integration by parts..
Hint: $\ln(x-4) = 1 \cdot \ln(x-4)$, can you now guess what to differentiate and integrate?
lgkoo
Wait so what was I doing then
oh ok
I get now that u = ln(x-4) and v is 1
What did I get for what?
what did you get after you have u = ln(x-4) and v' = 1

Thanks for the help
@pulsar zealot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Elsa and Victoria each picked 600 rose bushes. Elsa worked for two hours longer than Victoria because she picked 15 fewer rose bushes per hour. How many hours did Elsa work, and how many hours did Victoria work?
i am not sure how to get to an answer.
i am guessing the table looks somewhat like this, but i am not sure what numbers to input
@slow flax Has your question been resolved?
figured out more and turned out like this
@slow flax Has your question been resolved?
@slow flax Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @slow flax
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
after reducing how did we get that matrix?
have you carried out the operations?
what operations?
i watched this video and he wrote this matrix immediately
the answer to "how" is "by row reduction"
ok, i have to watch it and learn very well, thank you!
.close
Closed by @tardy oar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does this symbol mean the number has to be a positive real number?
or just any real number
yes
which one?
first
Closed by @trim carbon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @sweet swallow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yep
Closed by @fair shore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yes, I believe so
oh wait
you have to check that the inner product of p with t is 0, and that the inner product of p with k is 0
it can’t just be either of them
Closed by @lone arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
how do you get the estimated value of 'y' in linear regressions
thats the paper and i think i know how to do the others im just not sure on how to get the expected y value
@pearl falcon Has your question been resolved?
@pearl falcon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pearl falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
one idea: you can see how the shaded area can be broken up into a big square and then a triangle on each side
yep i tried doing that
however my answer was 11a
i think i did something wrong when calculating the length of the triangles
Can you show your work of the triangles length?
so since each side is a, i used pythagoras for this isoceles and this square root a^2+ a^2 to get 2a as the bottom length of the triangle
$$\sqrt{a^2+a^2} \Rightarrow \sqrt{2a^2}$$
vrsth
so
vrsth
that should be the length right
Yeah
okk thank you!
Your welcome good luck!
@plain sage Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @plain sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm stuck on the left side, but I have the following:
Then when I plug that in
Does this all look right so far?
<@&286206848099549185> I am stuck, could someome please help?
The b cancels too
how so?
Imagine $z = \frac{b}{x_p}$ then $\frac{1}{z\ln(10)} \cdot -z \cdot \frac{1}{x_p}$
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Is that more clearer?
hold on
,,\dd x_p = -\frac{\ln(10)}{x_p} \dd u
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
yep i see that now
i wonder if that ends up doing anything in the final answer though
the initial condition is x_p(0)=1
Let's see
Also wouldn ya end up with a constant C on the right after integration?
yea
Oh there
i have that
okoko
did i do something wrong maybe
Since z cancels we would get 1/ln(10)x_p
,,\dd u = -\frac{1}{\ln(10)x_p} \dd x_p \iff \dd x_p = -\ln(10)x_p \dd u
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
yes
-ln(10)?
yes
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Ok yea
yea
this
yep
and if I have the initial condition of
not sure
well a and t are constant
seems like a differential equation
it is a differential equation
but you integrated by t
well let me try t as one
and t = 0
then you would get something in terms of b for C
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
yea haha
now plug that back in
,,- \ln (10) \cdot \ln \abs{\log_{10}\left ( \frac{b}{x_p} \right )} = at - \ln (10) \cdot \ln \abs{\log_{10}(b)}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
separation of variables
there it is x_p(t) lmao
So we need to solve for x_p
how do we do that 
ye
,,\abs{\log_{10}\left ( \frac{b}{x_p} \right )} = e^{-\frac{at}{\ln(10)}} \cdot \abs{\log_{10}(b)}
oh no
forogto
what]
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
I think we dont need the absolute values
nah
because of the condiition
then i would subtract the left
,,\log_{10}(b) - \log_{10}(x_p) = e^{-\frac{at}{\ln(10)}} \cdot \log_{10}(b)
ah yes yes
non nvm
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
I applied log(a/b) = loga - logb
yep
,,\log_{10}(x_p) = \log_{10}(b) - e^{-\frac{at}{\ln(10)}} \cdot \log_{10}(b) = \log_{10}(b) \left (1- e^{-\frac{at}{\ln(10)}} \right )
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Apply 10^(...)
,,x_p = 10^{\log_{10}(b) \left (1- e^{-\frac{at}{\ln(10)}} \right )}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
so log(10) and 10 cancel?
yes kinda
we have 10^(ab)
correct
,,x_p = \left ( 10^{\log_{10}(b)} \right )^{\left (1- e^{-\frac{at}{\ln(10)}} \right )}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
so now it cancels
ok
,,x_p = b^{\left (1- e^{-\frac{at}{\ln(10)}} \right )}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
hip hip hooray
really?
they are missing the ln(10)
hm?
I hate when they dont specify the base
if it was ln(...) = u then we wouldn't have ln(10)
so log is actually ln
in this
We would have -1/x_p
yes
BRUH
i am so pissed
how come we come so close
so just replace everything with ln now?
ok
,,u = \ln \frac{b}{x_p} \implies \dd u = \frac{1}{\frac{b}{x_p}} \cdot -\frac{b}{x_p^2} \dd x
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
So we end up with $\dd u = -\frac{1}{x_p} \dd x \iff \dd x = -x_p \dd u$
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
So imagine
We substitute
Imagine we do all steps instead with -ln(10) we do it with (-1) only
So yea
we should get to their solution doing so
Like here we would divide by (-1) and then do e^(...)
then we would have e^(-at) ...
So eventually $x_p = b^{\left (1- e^{-at} \right )}$
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
which is pretty rare in such occasions
wait
Honestly if you gave the solutions with ln(10) then your prof should have take away points from himself lmao
so the left side was just 1/u
with minus
all steps are similiar
we just differ by some factor
replace it ln(10) = 1
haha looks wrong
ln(10) to 1
yea
then exponentiate
yea
also
did you realize
whehter we did it before or after
we got it right
with the constant C
wdym sorry my brain is fried rn
You want first to solve for x_p
which is fine
previously we first evaluated C and then solved x_p
so dont exponentiate yet
both would work
thats not what i am saying
yes
ah ok
we first evaluated the constant
then solved for x_p
now we doing it backwards
my point
both work
just as a note
I would actually solve for x_p
oh?
yea
so then is becomes
because solving for C first usually results to lengthier terms
like previously
haha
,,\ln \abs{\ln \left ( \frac{b}{x_p} \right ) } = -at - C
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
you really fried haha
now let's e^(...)
at least that's what my teacher says
,,\ln \left ( \frac{b}{x_p} \right ) = e^{-at - C}
yea but i dont want to
xD
your teacher screwed us already once
LMAO
might aswell leave the abs
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
Now you wanna solve mid way for C 😂
wuhhhhhhhhhh
,,\ln(b) - \ln(x_p) = e^{-at - C}
never heard of that
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
yes
yea you're fried lmao
now we plugin? 🥺
let's solve for x_p first
or sh ould be add term over first
haha
ye
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
correct
Now the same bs as before 🥱
but but but
,,x_p = e^{\ln(b) - e^{-at - C}}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
e^(a+b) = e^a * e^b
,,x_p = e^{\ln(b)}\cdot e^{ - e^{-at - C}}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
at least stick to your word
let us finish
YAY
,,1 = e^{\ln(b)}\cdot e^{ - e^{- C}} = e^{\ln(b) - e^{- C}}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
We can write as 1 = e^0 and compare exponents
,,e^0 = e^{\ln(b) - e^{- C}} \implies 0 = \ln(b) - e^{- C}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
,,\implies e^{-C} = \ln(b) \iff C = -\ln (\ln (b))
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
So
NOW WE PLUGIN C
,,x_p = e^{\ln(b)}\cdot e^{ - e^{-at + \ln (\ln (b))}}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
,,x_p = b \cdot e^{ - e^{-at} e^{\ln (\ln (b))} }
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
twa
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
power rules
i thought e^ln(b) cancels to just b
,, e^{a+b} = e^a \cdot e^b
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
what about at?
oh wait no i see it now
,,x_p = b \cdot \left (e^{\ln(b) } \right )^{-e^{-at}}
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
power rule again, right?
yes
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
,,x_p = b \cdot b^{-e^{-at}}
so switch
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
I was your biggest comeback
😝
yea continue


