#help-23
1 messages · Page 228 of 1
integral of sqrt(x) from 0 to 1 minus the integral of x from 0 to 1
thats area tho by volume are you working with 3 dimensions?
or just a misworded question?
i am working worh volu,e
im not sure what u mean u passed section of intersection
one sec gotta refresh myself lol
alright so we can imagine it as a 3d shape
and if we look at it straight on from the y axis its like this hollow cone
now we can imagine we just take a cross section of it
so imagine a line that spans all y for a single x, a verticle line
this cross section is a washer so we can find the radius using this line we just imagined
the distance from the axis to a line is the radius of that function
so for y = x, the r = x
and y = sqrt(x) the r is sqrt(x)
calculate area of this washer
integrate this area from 0 to 1
yup
okay i acc
mentally calculated everything and
then i put in calculator
and it worked but
i have a question
like
calculator shows it like this
i did it like this
is this still good
i can put everything in abs value so its positive
yes if you geometrically know the outer is... outside
seems good to me
so long as you understand the concept and used it to get the correct answer
yes but he put abs
^
as long as abs
i mean
cuz sometimes i cant know graph
by function
so its good to know if i can just
abs it
u dont need to tho
no
u still need break the integral by when the thing of the abs is positive or negative to compute it by hand
along 0-1 y=x is always less so you know thats the smaller area u subtract from the larger one
it works because you already know volume outer - volume inner >=0
which implies |volume outer - volume inner| >= 0
which implies |-(volume inner - volume outer)| >= 0
... ok and so on |volume inner - volume outer| >= 0
instead of (2-y)
are both fine?
(y-2)^2 = y^2 - 2y + 4
ah
(2-y)^2 = y^2 -2y + 4
for the radius it doesn't
BUT
for the volume outer - volume inner it does
... or if you fucked up the order you are just going to get the volume but with a negative sign
so yeah it kinda doesn't matter just remove the sign if that happens
Closed by @dense wadi
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi. I am very stuck on these questions. I need them ASAP by midnight today. I’m confused because our teacher didn’t teach us matrix/matrices and other than that I am very bad at math and have a hard time learning and memorizing concepts. If anyone could help me, I would be extremely grateful.
this is a vectors topic question, idk if this would apply
haha it’s okay😭 I ACCIDENTALLY THOUGHT YOU WERE TRYNA HELP ME WITH THIS PIC LOL
Thats ok lets concentrate on one of those equations
This one for example you can rewrite in matrix form
what would that look like?
Youd take each coefficient and put them in a matrix like this :
2 3 -1
6 -4 2
2 -10 4
You can see each line and column have corresponding coefficients right
what do you mean by corresponding?
Coefficient in line 1, column 1 is indeed in the 1st line and 1st column of the matrix
( you can write the matrix another way but we will just go with this for simplicity sake)
yea i see but i don’t know what importance this brings😭
Suprising you are asked to solve this with no knowledge of matrices
The matrix would look like this
It will be important for the matrix multiplication part
ohhh ok
Matrix multiplication goes like this:
Each line of the first matrix is "multiplied" by each column of the second
Multiplication not in the usual way of course but in a way like: first element of the line with first element of the column, second of the line with second of the column and so on
If you know dot product think of it as the i,j position in the resulting matrix is the dot product of the ith row in matrix a and the jth column in matrix b
i think i understand
This also highlights a condition for matrix multiplication (number of columns of the first matrix needs to be equal to the number of lines of the second matrix)
but now i only have one box (or wtv it’s called) of matrixes, what do i do now
Well if you look at your equations
There are also the x y and z terms
And those can also be fit into a one column matrix (also known as a vector) to complete the left hand side of the equation like this:
Conditions are met for multiplication (3 columns and 3 lines)
okay i see
Now if you go on calculating this product using matrix multiplication rules itd be like:
yea i just did that and got the equations again
Which is exactly like those first three equations
Yep
Now all is left is the right hand side of the equation
Which are just those three numbers that are left on the right fit into a vector
oh yea
Which completes the matrix form of those equations
Now what youll be asking
Well we have to look for an intersection, aka a vector (x y z) that satisfies this equations
yea haha😭
Intuitevely youd think, since this is a linear algebraic equation written like Ax = b, to just multiply both sides by the inverse of A just like we do with normal algebraic equations
But with matrices an inverse is not always assured
And also multiplication is not commutative for matrices (this just means that for two matrices, the order of multiplication matters, just a fancy word)
So to find the inverse youd need to check for its determinant
what is that?
Well its a numeric value that gives an idea on how matrices transform a space
But simply put
im getting confused😭
Just a numeric value that is calculated in a super specific way lol
So dont bother yourself with that space bending stuff
Unless for later if youre interested check out 3blue1browns video on matrices but now since you dont have much time its just a little numeric value we extract from the coefficients of a matrix
yea i dont have much time rn unfortunately😭
Our matrix is 3x3 (3 lines by 3 columns)
So its square
So a determinant can be calculated
(Determinants are only calculated for square matrices)
For example:
You can calculate the determinant this way
Here is a useful website to do this for you since you have more equations to do and it takes some time for each matrix
Important is to show you understand the approach for each system of equations
Since we know how to calculate the determinant we can tell if there is an intersection or not in the first place before finding those x y and z
do i add the third matrix on the same line as the matrix with the equations (but ob the other side if the = ?
For the website ?
Just enter the matrix with the coefficients for each system of equations
And then you can use det to calculate its determinant
im lost😭
this
You got the determinant part right
no
You got how to calculate it from that example?
Its okay
The determinant is useful because if its not zero we know the matrix has an inverse
And if the matrix has an inverse, the matrix equation is solvable
And if the matrix equation is solvable, that implies there is an intersection between the three planes
ok sounds good
And we can also find the intersection point using the inverse like this:
Its important we multiply by the inverse from the left and not from the right because theyre not the same (order matters for matrix multiplication)
So try calculating the determinant using that website
And then the inverse if the determinant is non zero
Also to clarify A is the matrix there, X and B are vectors
so would it be like 2 times 5?
Youre calculating the determinant manually?
oh no i was just asking if this would be the correct values to multiply
Oh for what
wait im starting to understand, the goal is to make likr a bottom left square of all 4 numbers being 0
Where?
i watched a video but maybe i got it wrong
No its okay tho whatd you get as the determinant, or did you understand up to this point the general approach
omg i just found my question on chegg haha😭 but looking at it, it’s not saying anything about a determinant which is weird
Thats gaussian elimination
what😭
Its a way to get the solution by doing some clever operations to each line and column of the matrix until you get the identity matrix on the left
man i hate math this is so confusing😭😭😭 i have no idea how i’m gonna finish this and the other 3 questions by midnight
damn
Its a good way to fetch solutions but it can confuse you so leave it after midnight
Also it requires some thourough operations which can take time
Thorough*
😭😭😭 what should i do i have like an hour left for 4 questions😭😭😭
Its okay have you understood the general approach up to this point
a little, i got lost at the determinant
the order of which value(s) to do the operations with and everything🫠
Its ok all you need to understand about the determinant right now is this
There are websites to calculate the determinant for you under seconds so you dont bother with the work
Like this one https://www.desmos.com/matrix
Add a new matrix and calculate it
Its determinant*
Lets start with this one
For the first system of equations
Rest are gonna be a breeze too
Youll find the determinant to be 0 normally
i write all 3 eqns?
it shows me det (A) is -16
Whats the matrix you entered?
No worries
Conclusion?
No, determinant is zero so that means that equation we wrote earlier is not solvable
Which means no intersectiok
Intersection*
i thought 0 meant there is an intersection lol😭
Nah zero means no intersection
Non zero means we have to calculate the inverse of that matrix to determine the solution
But thats it for the first system of equations
okay yayyyy thank youuu🙏🙏🙏
No problem
would you be willing to help me with the other questions too?
Sure
Alright
For a there is a bit of an exception
We only have two planes
Which means there is an intersection and its a line (not a point) or we have no intersection at all
how do you do that question?
i did it earlier and this is what i got
i feel like it’s wrong tho😭
Its okay if its wrong
Z wont cancel there youd need to sum the two equations instead
Eitherway youll get the line equation and do the same thing
i don’t wanna sound weird or anything but i’m a visual learner and it’s harder for me to understand by text😭
Im talking about how you calculated the difference of the two equations instead of summing them to cancel the z out here (top right)
You sum each term and get x + y = 11/5
Yea
Yea thats correct
how would i simplify it tho
cause it’ll be 2x/3 + 11/5/3 - 5/3
it’s getting too complicated
Itll be 3z - 2x = -14/5
x = 7/5 + 3z/2
3z/2 my bad
@tender vapor just rechecked and i was wrong with smth my bad:
x = 14/5 + 15z
y = -3/5 - 3z
Which will get you your parametrized plane equation
(x, y, z) = (14/5, -3/5, 0) + (3, -3, 0)*t
@tender vapor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @storm umbra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
solve the following equation for x:
x^5 - 10x^4 + 39x^3 - 64x^2 + 44x - 8 = 0
Im new comer help me
@distant steppe This doesn't have a closed form solution in terms of radicals.
Also this thread may lock suddenly, so please open a new help thread
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I solve algebratic fractions
From her other posts elsewhere ^
I don’t get where the R(y+1) goes into 2R 2/(y+1)
i mainly need steps written out as well for preperation for tommorrows quize
So if you have the same thing in both the top and bottom of a fraction then these will almost always cancel to 1.
For instance, 7/7 = 1, and 34.2/34.2 = 1. If we have even a variable x/x, this is also 1.
Except when x = 0
So when you multiply R(y+1) by (2R)/(y+1)^2 you get 2R^2 (y+1) / (y+1)^2
And you have one copy of (y+1) in the numerator and one copy in the denominator, these cancel to 1.
oh wait its broken
wish they had a rawing pad on disocrd
wait still broken
so would the steps be
bruh
- cancel out duplicate facotrs
$\frac{R(y+1)}{\frac{(y+1)^2}{2R}} = \frac{R(y+1)}{1} * \frac{1}{\frac{(y+1)^2}{2R}} = \frac{R(y+1)}{1} * \frac{2R}{(y+1)^2}} = \frac{2R^2}{y+1}$
torqua
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
ok im done now
\begin{align*}
R (y+1) \times \frac{2R}{(y+1)^2} &= \frac{R (y+1)}{1} \times \frac{2R}{(y+1)^2} \
&= \frac{R (y+1) \times 2R}{1 \times (y+1)^2} \
&= \frac{2R^2 (y+1)}{(y+1)^2} \
&= \frac{2R^2}{(y+1)} \times \frac{y+1}{y+1}\
&= \frac{2R^2}{(y+1)} \times 1\
&= \frac{2R^2}{(y+1)}
\end{align*}
OmnipotentEntity
that makes more sense
would it be the same if both top and bottom of the fraction had two different factors each
Can you give an example?
Whenever you have a fraction in the denominator you multiply the top and bottom by its inverse
So to simplify:
\begin{align*}
\frac{\frac{a}{b}}{\frac{c}{d}} &= \frac{\frac{a}{b}}{\frac{c}{d}} \times 1 \
&= \frac{\frac{a}{b}}{\frac{c}{d}} \times \frac{\frac{d}{c}}{\frac{d}{c}} \
&= \frac{\frac{a}{b} \times \frac{d}{c}}{\frac{c}{d} \times \frac{d}{c}} \
&= \frac{\frac{ad}{bc}}{\frac{cd}{cd}} \
&= \frac{\frac{ad}{bc}}{1} \
&= \frac{ad}{bc}
\end{align*}
OmnipotentEntity
Notice that at the end, we just needed to flip c/d upside and multiple it with the numerator.
But for this to be true we also needed cd ≠ 0
@misty glade does that make sense?
yes it does
Can anyone help me with this
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
thank you, ill try and fit it on my index card for tommorrows quize
Best of luck
thank you
how do closeit
".close"
.close
Closed by @misty glade
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anyone know how we got 729 as answer
Other than 30 I can think correct answer is 64 which is from 2^6
👀
sorry, all six questions be attemted so this way how can we leave question blank
Closed by @lime mango
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am working with two arrays, $\texttt{arr1}$ and $\texttt{arr2}$, which contain values ranging from $-7$ to $4$. I need to find a function $f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow (0,1)$ that normalizes these values to the interval $(0,1)$. The requirement is such that if $C = \texttt{arr1} \times \texttt{arr2}$ (element-wise multiplication), I want to transform this using $f$ so that:
[ C' = f(\texttt{arr1}) \times f(\texttt{arr2}) ]
where $C'$ is the normalized form of $C$. The critical property required is that the inverse of $f$, denoted as $f^{-1}$, should allow:
[ f^{-1}(C') = C ]
This implies the following functional properties:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f(x) \times f(y) = f(x \times y)$ for any $x, y \in \mathbb{R}$
\item $f$ and $f^{-1}$ are well-defined across the real numbers.
\end{enumerate}
Essentially, I need $f$ and $f^{-1}$ such that $f^{-1}(f(x) \times f(y)) = x \times y$.
Can you help identify such a function, or advise if this transformation is mathematically feasible given the constraints? If possible, an explicit form of this function and its inverse would be highly beneficial.
Κώστας Μήτρογλου
Values ranging to -7 to 4 shouldn't be taken into consideration when finding the functions because these could easily change
this is not possible
you want f defined to be for all real numbers
in particular you want f(1)
lets call f(1)=a and try to find out what a can be
we notice that a*a=f(1)*f(1)=f(1*1)=f(1)=a
so a^2=a
which means that either a=0 or a=1
maybe as a more general background, this property f(a*b)=f(a)*f(b) is also called a homomorphism property and such an f is called a homomorphism (in abstract algebra). there is no such function f:R->(0,1), e.g. for the reason listed above
oops sorry. the range should be [0,1]
f: R-> [0,1]
ok
that sadly still doesnt save you
for starters, a=0 definitely shouldnt be, cause then f(x)=f(1*x)=f(1)*f(x)=0*f(x)=0 always. so that would be bad
so lets say a=1, aka f(1)=1
lets think about what f(2)=b and f(1/2)=c could be
we notice that 1=f(1)=f(2*1/2)=f(2)*f(1/2)=b*c. so b and c should multiply to 1
but if b and c are in [0,1], then thats not possible, except for b=c=1. which would also be bad
I would assume the issue is going from R to (0,1) (non-negatives?)
is there any more formal proof that this can't work?
I gave you a formal proof
Closed by @tribal pecan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@peak estuary Thank you 🙂
yw
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
here i have to determine a region whose area is equal to the given limit without evaluating the limit
how do i interpret that as the area of the region lying under the graph from the given limit?
not sure how interval was found to be [0,2] either
i've looked at example problems and i can't seem to understand the procedure
@chrome cipher Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @chrome cipher
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
.close
Closed by @chrome cipher
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Urgent HELP
What are the bounds of the integral
so you are integrating from an unknown value os to 2?
I need the Pd
No, it just says x is the line
ohhhhh
So its asking you to find the area closed between the x-axis, x = 2, y = e^x, and y = x + 1
Correct?
Yes
Exactly
And to draw it in the coordinate system
This is a rather strange problem
Since there isn't an area which is bound by all four lines
I need the surface of that triangle in between
That's the Pd
But idk how to get to it
I need the process of integration and then addition
Is the black line y=e^x?
Yes
And green is y=x+1?
Yes
Hm
Im not entirely sure what you mean by surface
Do you just need the area of the black highlighted region?
Surface of D and d is what was given
I'm not sure either i'm thinking😭
I think it might be this, since it is bound by all four of the specified lines
Maybe, the problem is that e^x is nowhere to be seen
I am thinking that it is the area under the curve of e^x from -infinity to 2 minus the small triangle
It's probably this
The equation that you would set up here is
The area there is simply
Aha
But the problem is then you dont have x + 1
Aha
So I think its probably asking for this
Okay then how do we solve this
Which you can then solve for
^
Aha aha
it is the area under e^x - the area under x + 1
Since that will get you the small highlighted area
Do you know how to do the integrals?
The antiderivative of e^x is just e^x
and to find the antiderivative of x + 1, you can just use the power rule (x^n -> x^(n+1)/(n+1))
so you would get the antiderivative of x + 1 to be x²/2 + x
Yes?
This
Is this not right?
This does not get you the area
You need to include the bounds
Aha
How
The bounds are the left and right side of the area that you want to find
For the integral of e^x, your bounds would be negative infinity to 2
So we get e^x - x²/2 -x+c, how did u get +x and no c?
Since the tail of e^x goes to the left forever, but the x = 2 equation stops it at x = 2
?
The numbers specifying the bounds are important, you must evaluate the integrals with them
You can write it down something like that
I'm not sure if this is the proper notation, but it is usually how I write it
I see
Now what else?
Then you can plug your values into your equation, like so
After that is just simplification down to the final answer
Ok let's see what it gives
I believe you should end up with e² - 9/2
And that's it?
I believe that should be the area of this black region, yes
No problem
.close
Closed by @magic hare
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is it possible for me to get help in a vc cuz I am missing like a whole topic but I am a 10th grader so that'd make it easier
Hey therr how can I help ya
I’m in school right now but if you tell me the topic I can try to sum it up
bro I am missing a whole topic Ive got this project that I am doing and I moved schools
I have a like data set and they are asking me to graph this
c) Calculate the 5 values for a box and whisker plot, then draw the plot. [5]
Minimum = ________
1st Quartile = ________
Median = ________
3rd Quartile = ________
Maximum = ________
Can i hav the data set
1 sec
loading ty for helping out tho
18.660 + 25.115 + 30.415 + 32.165 + 33.640 + 34.605 + 36.835 + 57.010 + 69.905 + 94.920 + 126.055
ignore the +'s
Minimum is the smallest # Max is largest Median is the middle number first quartile is the set of numbers before the halfway and 3rd is the set after halfway
U have 11 numbers
What number would be halfway thru the data set
but like why are they asking for 5 values tho
Wdym
Oh okay i see
They want the median minimum max q1 and q3
They want those 5 values
U found the median
Thats 1/5 done
Lets move on to the min and max
What is the smallest number in the set
18.660 and 126.055
quartiles?
is 34 gonna be from the first tho cuz the amount of values I have is odd
Yeha
So everything before 34 is one set
Everything after is another
The median from the set before is your q1
The median from the set after is ur q3
q1=1st set q3=2nd set?
Correct
Everything before the whole median is q1 and everything after the whole median is q3
Yea
.close
Closed by @rain stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A LEVEL MATHS IS HARD! LET ME HELP :)
MY TOP TEN TIPS for A Level PURE
https://youtu.be/QttXpXrxGN4
EVERYTHING you need to memorise for your A Level Pure Exam
https://youtu.be/yJCnyTsDt84
MADAS MATHS papers
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrHSLsLY6wig21xPqtfdIVp5M5b4csB6c
MADAS Website; the guy is Maths legend!
https://www.madasmaths.com...
The working for pat b at 7:39
Why does he set dr/dx to 0 when differentiating implicitly?
Why is that max r
Whenever you're looking for the maximum value or the minimum value of something, you need to differentiate and set to 0
You want the radius to be 'as big as possible'
You have a function in two variables: x and r which equals 0
You can think of r in this case as a y-value (the dependent variable: r depends on x) and x is an x-value (the independent variable)
So that's why you're finding dr/dx and not say dx/dr
dr/dx gives you the x-value for when r is the largest or smallest
Oh yes this is what I needed for clarification I forgot lol
No worries
Closed by @midnight herald
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@tepid phoenix Has your question been resolved?
@tepid phoenix Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Using vectors p and q find others given.
Explain why, dont just solve it.
Note that AD and BC are equal as vectors. So are AB and DC
Notice order of letters
The rest is just parallelogram law
Let me see. I will ping you once again.
.close
Closed by @delicate copper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please help, I tried using the Arithmetic formula Tn=a+(n-1)d for the sequence below, but Idk if im doing it right because I got -2 by doing T-2=3+(n-1)-2.
<@&286206848099549185>
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Sorry
find the gradient
and you know y intercept is 5
i dont even know what that is..
the slope
maybe watch some vids on linear functions
This algebra video explains how to write a linear equation in slope intercept form y=mx+b. It also explains how to identify the slope and y-intercept from the equation as well as how to graph the linear equation.
Algebra For Beginners:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHeirBPOI6w
How To Solve Linear Eq...
Closed by @median spear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
I still do not understand
you're missing parentheses / not substituting properly
you have
$$T_n = a + (n-1)d$$
you've identified $a = T_1 = 3$ \
and $d = -2$ \
to get $T_{-2}$, replace ALL $n$ in the equation with -2.
and make sure you place () where needed or use additional multiplication symbols to maintain the order of operations
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
so T-2=3+((-2)-1)(-2)
use _ to denote subscript
what?
\verb|T-2| reads as $T-2$ \
to represent $T_{-2}$ in plain text, type \verb|T_(-2)|
ℝαμΩℕωⅤ
but the right side is fine
T_(-2)=3+((-2)-1)(-2)
missing ) on the right side now
T_(-2)=3+((-2)-1**)**(-2)
now simplify the right side
Yeah, that makes more sense than what the other guy tried to explain
T_(-2)=9
yes
Closed by @median spear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What was I supposed to do
One way you can do this is multiply and divide by conjugate
Wdym
Why dividing by it
Well you know how a^2 - b^2 = (a - b)(a + b) right
Yeah
Whats a - b
?
From this
Basically factorize it by using it's conjugate
Sqrtx^2+1)-x
This
Or express in other terms
What would this be in terms of that remarkable identity
a - b = (a^2 - b^2)/(a + b) right?
Why r u dividing it
Coz you multipied it
Bruh
You have to multiply and divide with the conjugate
Bro see this is the question right
?
You multiplied the conjugate to it
now you have to divide to make it 1
otherwise it would be altering the question
My answer was 1
Nah
You still don't understand
Check the answer in google if possible
What you did was correct but thats for the numerator
Now theres still sqrt(x^2 + 1) + x in the denominator
Which then you can evaluate the limit normally and get 0
I don’t get how u get that
Where did that come from
From diving and multiplying by it
If you have a number say 3
3 = (3 * 2)/2
You can do this to perserve its value but do some operations to get what you wqnt
Want(
My problem doesn’t even have a denominator tho
Which is what we did with the term in our limit
Yes we added that
Because we multiplied and divided by sqrt(x^2 + 1) + x
a - b is still equal to (a-b)(a+b)/(a+b)
And in our case a is sqrt(x^2 + 1) and b is x
There’s no point in doing that tho
Why not
Its just (a-b)
Well look what it got us in the numerator
Now we dont have to deal with an indeterminate form
The x^2 cancel out
The limit is just 0
@stiff vine Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please Name 2 vectors which are parallel and have same magnitude and point towards same direction
I don't think there are any 2 unique vectors which satisfy this tbh
Hmm, can 2 oppo sides of parallelogram satisfy?
...I wouldn't call those unique vectors tbh
that's more of like
the same vector, but translated
That's what I am asking for
So will they solve the question?
I was reading a book
So... B is initial position of a particle and A is final position
So displacement was given
A - B vector
I got a bit confused and tried to derive
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
okay, cool.
what's the question?
Here I stopped
The lower dotted line represented A - B
And upper dotted line also A - B because parallelogram
But I feel these 2 dotted lines are very different
well it's a displacement isn't it?
all you care about is the magnitude of the vector
True but direction is also important because we are dealing with vectors
Kindly forgive, am just not in a very good mood
I mean, it's the same vector, just translated
and it should point in the same direction too
(also, since I'm a linear algebra shill, I have to mention that there is a more general notion of "vector", that does not depend on direction at all)
but that's not relevant here
Take a reference point, any point on plain
And look at direction they point in
Aren't they different
i,j, k are that only no?
well... no
Aren't they unit vectors in a particular axis
"vector" just means element of a vector space
they are
but about your question... is the displacement you care about from A to B or from B to A?
B to A
Sure
we can see that the vector from B to A is the same as the vector from O to
I'll call the point C
it's translated yes, but that's still the same vector
afaik, all vectors which point in the same direction and have the same magnitude are the same
But imagine yourself standing at any point on plane and looking towards where arrows are point
Technically speaking they are different directions no
because we always take the coordinates of a vector to start at the origin
For that matter
How do u actually judge if 2-3-5-10 vectors are pointing in same direction
I think you're talking about affine spaces lol
In mathematics, an affine space is a geometric structure that generalizes some of the properties of Euclidean spaces in such a way that these are independent of the concepts of distance and measure of angles, keeping only the properties related to parallelism and ratio of lengths for parallel line segments. Affine space is the setting for affine...
and unfortunately, I can't say I'm very well versed with them
Just give the summary of it
I mean what it says
the informal description is that an affine space is what's left of a vector space when you forget about where the origin is
in this scenario, addition of vectors isn't agreed upon because any two observers can claim they have the origin actually, this isn't relevant to your original question and might even be confusing
in your original post, one can take O to be the origin (in which case the displacement vector is OC), or one can take B to be the origin (in which case the displacement vector is BA)
I didn't fully understood it but would like to continue it later
Currently in a bad mood so anyway not gonna understand anything
I mean it's okay to be in a bad mood lmao
but I would suggest not xy'ing your problem in the future regardless of how you feel
(also, I highly recommend learning linear algebra, that subject is awesome; totally not me shilling
)
"vector" can mean so much more!
No that was result of my bad mood
Just shifted to new place
No friends
Life is just pissing me off
Biggest problem is I have absolutely nobody to talk to
Not even online lmao
No family nothing
I mean you can always talk about math here on mathcord lmao
That's only thing keeping me sane, math!
It's now just me, math, movies kinda situation
Anyways won't bore u much
haha
.close
don't worry about it
Closed by @crystal umbra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you can always talk to people in the discussion channels!
Naah naah it's fine
Nobody likes to listen a person just venting
Let them have a good time lol
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Say $A \subset \mathbb{R}$, and assume $|A| > 3$. How can I show that there always exists an $a \in A$ such that $A - {a}$ is disconnected? I get it in theory but idk how to write it up. My idea so far is to break it into cases: A is countable, A is an interval, or A is a union of intervals
bot
or, im trying to say you can remove "the middle point" and then you have a disconnection
No cases needed. You should be able to show it directly in the general case. Let $x, y, z \in A$ such that $x < y < z$. How can you construct nonempty disjoint two sets $U, V$ whose union is $A \setminus {a}$ using this information?
Awesam
Closed by @fickle island
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
conceptually, why do we divide the second derivative by x'(t) in parametric equations
why wouldnt it be y''(t)/x''(t) or (y'(t)/x'(t))'
sorry if my notation is bad
this is what im talking abt
@rigid imp Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
you on your own for this one bro😭 💔
its so over for my exam
bro isnt this calculus
try finding the damn answer instead of foolin around on discord😭
its easy
@rigid imp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i use algebra to simplify this to get the limit?
a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b)
@solid sequoia Has your question been resolved?
yk how you can turn x^2 - 4 into x+2 and x-2
radiation is saying try the same idea with both sides of the fraction
i believe
so would a be 2 and b be x?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would you do this
I think the easiest way would be to apply MVT for integrals
and how would you do that
the only problem that I think might cause some grief is with negative numbers. but that is probably going to be a result from the fact that their integral are equal.
well, have you learnt what the MVT for integrals are?
No
Umm, well. If you use it, would you have to prove it? cos if thats the case then that's probably not the way to do it.
yo fr? kinda crazy. they just let you use whatever thrm you want without proof?
another way would be to compare it to the intgral test for series which would be quite interesting.
depends if you've learnt any theorems around that?
would be more interesting that using MVT tbh
so prove the series diverges?
haha, yeah. I got a bit sidetracked lol. So you have the integral right. Then for some c in R (in assume??) the integral $\int_{a}^{b} (\frac{f(x)}{g(x)})^{n}f(x),dx = (\frac{f(c)}{g(c)})^{n}f(c)(b-a)$
theaveragejoe6029
since the interals of both f and g equal for all a and b, then just choose a' and b' such that $ (\frac{f(c)}{g(c)}(b'-a'))^{n}f(c)(b-a) = (\frac{f(c)}{g(c)})^{n}f(c)(b-a)$
ie that b'-a' = 1
$(\frac{f(c)}{g(c)}(b'-a'))^{n}f(c)(b-a) = (\frac{f(c)}{g(c)})^{n}f(c)(b-a)$
1212312121HEYYYYYYY
ahah, thanks lol
how would you know this tho
well, you are just choosing any a' and b', you can really choose anything like 2 and 1. right??
yeah but like wouldn't a' or b' be 0
if you differentiate a or b since they r just numbers
sorry, i mean a' and b' as in new numbers, I can't call them a and b since they are already used. but yeah, they arent a prime and b prime lol
ohhh
I was gonna use a* and b*, but I didn't think latex liked that
but yeah, then applying the MVT in reverse, you get f(c)(b-a)
which equals the integral of f which is postiive, so it diveges
how would you apply in reverse
well, this is the thrm: $\int^b_af(x),dx=f(c)(b-a)$ I get its not really backwards, but just a different direction to where you normally go
theaveragejoe6029
1212312121HEYYYYYYY
really just let f(c)/g(c) = h(c) which we can do since f and g are cts
shit sorry
ignor that
I mean instead that sub the integral into the f(c)(b-a)
so like this? $(\frac{f(c)}{g(c)})^{n}f(c)(b-a)\int_{a}^{b} (\frac{f(x)}{g(x)})^{n}f(x),dx
then how would i go from there
Wait nvm i got it
Thank you so much dude
Closed by @stable pine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@tranquil vector Has your question been resolved?
@tranquil vector Has your question been resolved?
@tranquil vector Has your question been resolved?
no one replied lol and the bot asks so often
@tranquil vector Has your question been resolved?
@tranquil vector Has your question been resolved?
@tranquil vector Has your question been resolved?
I don’t recall stuff like this super well and I could be completely wrong
But would you not first find an equation which solves the forcing term on the RHS
And then solve the now homogenous equation using Fourier series?
Yes. Something like that. I was told that you solve for u(x,y) = u h(x,y) + u_p(x,y) as the sum of homogenous and particular solutions.
How is this @candid turtle
Yes that looks fine, with the separation of variables stuff. I don’t remember if sinh and cosh is better as opposed to e^x and e^-x instead (I remember one or the other being much better). But I haven’t looked at this for so long I won’t be much more help than this I’m afraid 😦
I am not sure how to handle the non homogenous part (RHS) to find a particular solution. Can you have a look at how I did that on the solution. Does it seem right? @candid turtle
@tranquil vector Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tranquil vector
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain the answer to this question using prime factorization? I got 5/3 but the textbook says the answer is 5/8, I checked my answer on a calculator and its correct
how are u getting 5/3?
wait ill send my working
I turned 1500 and 2400 to 375 and 600 respectively
just halved both together until either number became a decimal number
prime factorization of 600 is
5x5x3x2x2x2
u forgot to multiply those 2s which gave u the answer 5/3
so I'm meant to drag down all the 2's from further up the tree down to the bottom? I didn't do that for other questions and got the right answer
for the other questions, if I dragged down more numbers I'd get the wrong answer, how come some questions need me to drag down and others dont? how do I differentiate between them?
well all needs to be dragged down
thats what prime factorization is
factoring a number till its in smallest prime number
like for 125
prime factorization would be 5x5x5
I get that now. What I'm confused by is if I apply this new knowledge to the questions I got lucky with, I'd end up with the wrong answer. How come?
I'll send an example
k
for this one, if I dragged the 2 down this would become 24/1 which is the wrong answer in the txt book
I got the correct answer which is 12/1 by only dragging the number above
yeah if I drag down the 2 on the right branch I'd get the wrong answer
3x3x2x5x2 would be for 180
5x3 would be for 15
5 and 3 cancels
3x2x2 would be whats left for 180
1 would be whats left for 15
3x2x2 = 12
12/1
how u got 12/1 without bringing that down is a mystery
Wait I think I dragged it down mentally but forgot to note it down in my work. sorry
np
@surreal tulip Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @surreal tulip
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
any ideas?
<@&286206848099549185>
if f is a function with 3 arguments, what should f((1,1,0),(0,1,1),(0,1,0)) then mean?
@cloud pagoda Has your question been resolved?
@cloud pagoda Has your question been resolved?
@cloud pagoda Has your question been resolved?
@cloud pagoda Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @cloud pagoda
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find $\int\frac1{\sqrt{e^{2x}+4e^x+1}} dx$
kheerii
I substituted $u=e^x, dx=\frac{du}{u}$ to get $$I=\int\frac1{u\sqrt{(u+2)^2-3}} dx$$
kheerii
What do I do after this? Trig sub doesn't seem to work very well
I got the integral $I=\int\frac{\sec\theta}{\sqrt{3}\sec\theta - 2} d\theta$ which doesn't seem very favourable
kheerii
i am confident there exists a better way to solve the original integral but i can also tell you this integral you have here is not bad to evaluate with tangent half angle substitution
okay, what's the better way?
tbh i don't know i just assumed because that's usually how nested u-subs work
and yeah the integral is not hard but converting it back into x seems tedious
what if you let e^x + 2 = u at the start and then let u = sec(theta)
that doesn't really do anything different
really?
what i mean to say is that it just doesn't work*
my point is that the nested u-substitutions still exist with your approach
(hence computationally the process of converting theta to x should remain the seame)
ah right
is there a smarter way?
was this a competition problem
u-substitution at the very least seems like a tacit requirement here
no it's just a general problem
i c
for jee
yeah
then i guess i'd just go with the nested u-subs
I don't see any other way tbh
yeah
the answer is $x-\log |1+2e^x+\sqrt{e^{2x}+4e^x+1}|+C$
kheerii
which seems awfully simple