help-23

[light shoal]

strangely worded question

3 + 5lambda = 0 obviously has one and only one solution

i'm not sure what more there is to say on the subject

[plucky swan]

idk i was gonna say like

since it's parametric

lambda like the constant which ties the equation together for all the points on the line

kind if like a replacement for the X in a normal 2d function

but like how do i put that into words idk im dumn

[safe radish]

@plucky swan Has your question been resolved?

[safe radish]

Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

[crude wharf]

<@&286206848099549185>

Helppp 😭

How you do this proof

@stray warren help

@lament bluff

[strange compass]

dont ping random ppl for help

are you familiar with proof by induction

[crude wharf]

I know them bro

[crude wharf]

Ye

How do u set the problem up

Like the basis step

[strange compass]

base case

[lament bluff]

can you explain in your own words what proof by induction is

[crude wharf]

Yea

[strange compass]

what n should you select for the base case

[crude wharf]

You prove it’s true for n=1 then assume it’s true for n=k

Then use induction hypothesis

[lament bluff]

uhhhh

close?

first show its true for n=1, thats your base case

full stop

[strange compass]

you need to prove that assuming n=k holds then n=k+1 also holds

[crude wharf]

Yea base case is weird

[lament bluff]

this is the full inductive step

dont split it so that "assume f(k) is true" is lumped into the base case

[strange compass]

also note that your base case n is not necessarily always 1 its just the smallest n possible

[crude wharf]

Hm so it’s 0?

[lament bluff]

there is no a_0

[crude wharf]

I’m confused

[lament bluff]

your sequence starts at a_1

[crude wharf]

Ye

[lament bluff]

so n=1 is your base case this time

[crude wharf]

But does n start at 0

[strange compass]

its asking you to prove that the formula is true for all natural numbers n

by definition natural numbers start at 1

[lament bluff]

no because if you plug in n=0 you cant evaluate a_0

a_0 is undefined

[strange compass]

^ may be a controversial opinion but whatever

[crude wharf]

Hm true

[lament bluff]

absolutely controversial, i do combi and i think it SHOULD start at 0

[crude wharf]

😭

[stray warren]

Nah 1 😭

[lament bluff]

but im not here to debate definitions and semantics

[crude wharf]

What are y’all yapping abt

I’m in precal

😭

[strange compass]

LOL since they provided a_1 i assumed their opinion was natural starts at 1

[lament bluff]

dont worry, sorry for digressing

i went off topic to add an opinion

[crude wharf]

Real

[lament bluff]

for this problem yes

[crude wharf]

Ok

Problem is I put n=1 in the formulas and they don’t equal eachother

[lament bluff]

are you sure?

plug it in, show your work

[crude wharf]

Clearly not true

[strange compass]

are you comparing a_2 to a_1

[crude wharf]

Yes that’s the problem

[crude wharf]

The other equation starts at a_2

[lament bluff]

what

plug n=1

why is a 2 appearing

[strange compass]

a_1 = -4 as you typed yourself

[crude wharf]

Ohhhhh

Huh

Math ain’t mathing rn

Ok base case is true then prove it for n=2 because I’m skeptical

[lament bluff]

ok plug n=2

do you know how to plug in?

[crude wharf]

I’m confused

[strange compass]

no

you're comparing a_3 to a_2 again

[lament bluff]

how come youre not just

[strange compass]

when you compute this you're using n=2

[lament bluff]

simply substituting n

[strange compass]

when you compute this you have to use n=3

[lament bluff]

put a 2 everywhere you see n

see that n? put a 2 instead

[crude wharf]

That’s what I did

💀

[lament bluff]

do it step by step

[crude wharf]

Wdymmm

[lament bluff]

like copy the equation

substitute n

[crude wharf]

😭

[lament bluff]

and then dont do anything else

copy the equation on its own, sub n on a new line under it

dont compute anything

[crude wharf]

@lament bluff

[lament bluff]

there you go

it works now, yeah?

like dont do anything fancy or weird

[crude wharf]

But this is comparing n=1 to n=2

[lament bluff]

take it one step at a time

you are not comparing anything

you are merely showing that

if you plug n=2 into the equation

it works

[crude wharf]

Because I’m plugging in different numbers for n

[lament bluff]

there is no a_1 here

no, you only plugged in n=2 in the first line

thats it

[crude wharf]

Yea what abt the second line

[lament bluff]

you had to EVALUATE a_2

[crude wharf]

😭

[lament bluff]

by using a_1

but that has nothing to do with the original equation

you plugged in n=2 there

so youre checking that n=2 works

thats it

[crude wharf]

Ok

[lament bluff]

so do your base case

plug in n=1

show that it works

[crude wharf]

Ok

@lament bluff

[lament bluff]

ok so

plugging in n=1 to show its true

thats the base step

the next part where you assume that plugging into any k is true

you are too quick to want to assume it

you are too antsy to get to the next step

[crude wharf]

Huh

I was taught this bro

[lament bluff]

full stop after "n=1."

now

on a new line

[crude wharf]

After we prove the bases

[lament bluff]

start with "Assume ..."

dont put it on the same line

its a different step entirely

[crude wharf]

💀 the lines matter

My professor doesn’t care I think

[lament bluff]

it doesnt matter to the professor

it matters to YOU because right now you are confused about the inductive step

because you dont know what is inductive and what is base

if you dont want my help ill go somewhere else

[crude wharf]

I didn’t say that

[lament bluff]

ok

[crude wharf]

I’m looking at the notes and he did start a new line for the assume but never explicitly told us to do so

[lament bluff]

well IM telling you to do it so you can organize your ideas better

[crude wharf]

Ok

[lament bluff]

so lets first explain how induction works

imagine youre standing in the back of an infinite line

i want to prove the following statement: Every person on the line is capable of touching the person in front of them.

base case: you can touch the person in front of you

[crude wharf]

Ye

[lament bluff]

inductive case: ASSUMING you can touch the person in front of you, then that person can also touch the person in front of them

[crude wharf]

Yes

[lament bluff]

you can replace "assuming" with "if" or "in the case that"

so think about how that works

since you can touch person 2

person 2 can touch person 3

and since p2 can touch p3

what does that imply

[crude wharf]

P3 can touch p4

[lament bluff]

can you see how this creates a domino effect to infinity

[crude wharf]

Ye

[lament bluff]

thats induction

thats why the "assume" stuff starts on a new line

it is separate from the base case

[crude wharf]

Ok

[lament bluff]

putting assume on the same line feels like you

broke the line at a weird place

like i did just now

its not wrong its just weird

[crude wharf]

I see

[lament bluff]

so now pretend you have some magic number k

in which you KNOW plugging it in works

[crude wharf]

We’re assuming that

[lament bluff]

prove that plugging in k+1 makes a true statement

yes

[crude wharf]

Ok then where do I go from there

[lament bluff]

you have a true statement by plugging in k

write that first

then write the statement you want to prove under it

first write that

[lament bluff]

good, plug in the k+1

so like write

"we will now show that:"

followed by the equation

[lament bluff]

good

now start algebraically manipulating this equation

so that it looks like the n=k case we are assuming

for example, can you see what to do with a_k+1?

on the lhs

[crude wharf]

Hm

Add 1?

[lament bluff]

no you have k+1 in the subscript

we need to rewrite $a_{k+1}$ into something with $a_k$

[flat frigate]

CosmoVibe

[crude wharf]

Why a_k

[lament bluff]

because you have this equation you need to prove to be true

but the only thing similar to it that you know is true

is the statement you assumed earlier by plugging n=k

youve got nothing else similar, so you have to use it

you need to turn it into that form

[crude wharf]

Hm

So subtract one?

😭

[lament bluff]

did you forget the definition of the sequence a

from the original problem?

look at the original problem

[lament bluff]

here

cant respond for a while

no signal

[crude wharf]

Mb sorry I gtg

Thanks for the help

[safe radish]

@crude wharf Has your question been resolved?

Channel closed

Closed by @crude wharf

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

[safe radish]

Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

[fathom canyon]

how does this converstion work?

when i tried it i got 21

[shadow tapir]

we pull a 3^(x-3) from both sides

[fathom canyon]

divide?

[shadow tapir]

yep we are essentially dividing since we are factoring it out

3^(x-3) divided by 3^(x-3) is just 1

for the next term,
3^x divided by 3^(x-3)

remember the laws of exponent when dividing?

we subtract the powers

it becomes
3^[x - (x -3)]

[shadow tapir]

no we are not dividing the whole equation by 3^(x-3)

we are just factoring

[fathom canyon]

woah

we can divide single parts of a equation??

the ratio in the equation would literally change

[shadow tapir]

its just factoring, we are still multiplying 3^(x-3) in the left side

[fathom canyon]

can you show as images?

[shadow tapir]

1s

[shadow tapir]

actually ill do your method to show how it results to this

[fathom canyon]

my method??

im trying understand the method

[fathom canyon]

now this

i understand

lets talk about

[shadow tapir]

okok

so their base is 3 right?

[fathom canyon]

we have to subract

[fathom canyon]

yes

[shadow tapir]

yk this right

[fathom canyon]

show me how this would play out

wait

[shadow tapir]

its x-(x-3)

[fathom canyon]

oh its -(x-3)

[shadow tapir]

meaning you have to distribute the - to -3 as well

yep

[fathom canyon]

checks out

thank you @shadow tapir

[shadow tapir]

its kinda hard to factor that way

[shadow tapir]

np

[fathom canyon]

its wayyyy harder for me to do it the other way

i asked like 3 of my buddies

somehow they got it

couldnt explain it

.close

[safe radish]

Channel closed

Closed by @fathom canyon

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

[safe radish]

Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

[pliant gorge]

How do u graph this?

[tranquil ore]

Desmos

[pliant gorge]

Like without it

How do u find the phase shift and period of this graph?

Would the period be 2pi divided by 2pi/12

[pliant gorge]

?

[shadow tapir]

in this form
y= Asin[B(x-c)] + D

x must be isolated first before you can use B

[pliant gorge]

Yeah

So first for the period, is it 12?

[shadow tapir]

so you gotta factor a 2pi/12 from 2pix/12 - pi/2

[shadow tapir]

correct

[pliant gorge]

K wait lemme write for phase shift

Would the phase shift be 3?

[shadow tapir]

correct

now the amplitude?

[pliant gorge]

It’s 3

The x axis is confusing me

[shadow tapir]

ye you got it right

[shadow tapir]

why does it

[pliant gorge]

So like for example the phase shift is 1 and that + the period is 12

What would be in between

[shadow tapir]

what do you mean by in between

[pliant gorge]

In a phase shift there’s 5 points right?

[shadow tapir]

you mean the x-intercept in the middle?

[pliant gorge]

What would be in the middle

[shadow tapir]

ohh i see

you need to take the midpoint between them

[pliant gorge]

6+7?

Then divide by 2

[shadow tapir]

it should be 1 and 13

[pliant gorge]

This is just an example

[shadow tapir]

then it should be

1+12 / 2

13/2

[pliant gorge]

Huh

Don’t u find the middle pt?

[shadow tapir]

what you have drawn is for a period of 11, not 12

[pliant gorge]

Like in between 1 n 5 is 3

[shadow tapir]

ye you are essentially finding the midpoint between them

[pliant gorge]

So what would the midpoint between 1 and 12 be?

[shadow tapir]

in the thing you have drawn, the midpoint between 1 and 12 is 6.5

[pliant gorge]

Oh alright

[shadow tapir]

but take note thats for a period of 11

[pliant gorge]

For a problem I had 6.5pi/2 just looked weird

Yea

K thx a lot

[shadow tapir]

ah

[pliant gorge]

For the help

[shadow tapir]

oki

[pliant gorge]

.close

[safe radish]

Channel closed

Closed by @pliant gorge

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

[safe radish]

Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

[versed wave]

Given the sphere $(S): (x-1)^2+(y-1)^2+(z-1)^2=16$ and the plane $(P): x+y+z+2=0$. The intersection of (P) and (S) is the circle (T). CD is a fixed diameter of (T), A is a point on (T). The line passing A and is perpendicular to (P) intersects (S) at B. Calculate $BC^2+AD^2$

[flat frigate]

FunguDeu

[versed wave]

i dont know where to even start with this

[safe radish]

@versed wave Has your question been resolved?

[vale hearth]

look at the image from this angle as shown in the arrow

i hope its clear

[vale hearth]

thats like its projection from that angle

[safe radish]

Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

[halcyon hearth]

Can anybody help me with a couple grade 12 calc questions?

[strange compass]

[halcyon hearth]

I can't do any of these 5 questions at all.

Im taking calc while taking advanced fucntions because I got screwed over

So I can't really do calc, and these I can't do at all

Can anybody give me answers in steps?

<@&286206848099549185>

[steel stag]

1, the derivative tells you the slope of a function at any point x, and the equation for a line with slope m at (x1,y1) is y-y1=m(x-x1)
2. differentiable means that the derivative changes smoothly, and you have to make sure that happens when the functions meet, so take their derivatives and set them equal at x=pi
3. you're told L'(t)=-0.1999, solve for t
4. you can do the product rule on the whole thing, but 2^x^2 needs a double chain rule, like d/dx[f(g(h(x)))] = f'(gh)*g'(h)*h'(x)
5. take the derivative two or three times and see what happens, it'll continue in this way

[halcyon hearth]

Thanks so much for the help and tips, but I seriously know 0 calc. Im basically just asking for answers. Ik I sound like a dick lmao but if nobody can help its alr

[shadow glade]

!noans

[safe radish]

The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.

[shadow glade]

not really how this server works 😐

[halcyon hearth]

oh okay my bad

.close

[safe radish]

Channel closed

Closed by @halcyon hearth

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

[safe radish]

Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

[kindred mesa]

I know I have to use Ramsey Theory, here's what I've tried so far

(ignore the writing in black)

<@&286206848099549185>

[safe radish]

@kindred mesa Has your question been resolved?

[kindred mesa]

<@&286206848099549185>

[safe radish]

@kindred mesa Has your question been resolved?

[safe radish]

Channel closed

Closed by @kindred mesa

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

[sweet solar]

How can i do these? I have no clue how to do proofs what so ever. And i have a test coming and these are just the easiest/basic proofs...

I dont understand the "proofs" part of the two colum proof

I can easily do the problems themselves of course but the proofs part is just so BS to me.

this and that theory or sum...

[vocal nymph]

I’ll go over question 5

So basically you want to find the angle using the proofs then state the proofs you used

To find x, notice how the 35 degrees and x are on a straight line

What’s the statement about angles on a straight line

[sweet solar]

uhh

its gotta do with like 180 right

congruence?

[vocal nymph]

Yeah

So for x, your answer would be

[sweet solar]

im not sure man, i dont understand the statements.

[vocal nymph]

Your answer for x degrees

Then angles on a straight line add to 180

[vocal nymph]

Can you elaborate

Which part don’t you understand

[sweet solar]

I dont understand the thereons

like i dont KNOW what stuff to put for the statements area

the two columb proofs type stuff

[vocal nymph]

In order to solve the angles

You used some rules right

Literally just wrote down those rules

[sweet solar]

uhh yeah but i dont know the names of those rules

😭

[vocal nymph]

Oh

[shadow tapir]

here

[sweet solar]

i just use like common sense.

[vocal nymph]

Which ones do you remember

[sweet solar]

about 0

i remember but dont know what they mean.

kinda

basically im at point 0

[sweet solar]

ah ic thse

e

it sjust that like how do i explain it

[vocal nymph]

lol you sorta just have to remember them

[sweet solar]

when im writing the two colum proofs i dont

know what to put next?

like i just jump stragith into the answer lol.. idk how im supposed to show step by stepby step..

its so tedious and annoying i just dont understand it

because i cant tell whats neccessaryt to put down or not

i just do everything in my head

[vocal nymph]

Look at the picture

[sweet solar]

yes

[vocal nymph]

Draw out which angles you need to find to find the answer

Then do through each one one by one and write down the rules to find those angles

[sweet solar]

hmm

ill try that

on numberr 8 right noiw

[vocal nymph]

It’ll be slower than doing it all in your head but you’ll miss marks otherwise

[sweet solar]

well basically im on all of them..

give me amoment

for this one

116 = 6x plus 32

what rule would i have to put

[vocal nymph]

Ok

[sweet solar]

alt ext

or vert angle?

[vocal nymph]

That’s just alternate

Alternate angles are equal

[sweet solar]

i dont need ext?

[vocal nymph]

No

[sweet solar]

can you explain please

[vocal nymph]

Ext is when both angles are outside the ‘shape’

[sweet solar]

hmm

[vocal nymph]

You see how the main part of the picture could be turned into a closed shape

If both angles are inside its interior

If both are outside its exterior

If one’s inside and one’s outside then don’t include any

[sweet solar]

ohhh

i understand

kinda

lemme do it and see if im doing it right

[vocal nymph]

If you don’t know then just do alternate angles

Twice

Cause it’s just one step more

[sweet solar]

yeah i dont even know what happendd.

[vocal nymph]

lol

[sweet solar]

i cant see what i did wrong right here

i foudn x

[vocal nymph]

Your maths is wrong or your rules are wrong

[sweet solar]

math

[vocal nymph]

Ah

You’re finding x?

[sweet solar]

mhm

psure x =14 tho

[vocal nymph]

116=6x+32

x=84/6

14

Yeah

[sweet solar]

ye

but the. when i find y

i get some bonkers answer

[vocal nymph]

Ah

That angle

[sweet solar]

5y-21+116=180

[vocal nymph]

The 6x+32

[sweet solar]

mhm

[vocal nymph]

Is still 116

5y-21=180-116

[sweet solar]

5y-21=64

[vocal nymph]

5y=85

[sweet solar]

5y=85

[vocal nymph]

yeah

[sweet solar]

17

but then

17x5

-21

64

oh

what did i do wrng in my work tf

ohhh i tried removing the 21 too early

whoopsie.

yeah im fdailing my test tomorrow

its officka

[vocal nymph]

(If that’s how you’re trying to prove it your doing it wrong)

(The proof is literally meant to be (for y) angles on a straight line add to 180)

[sweet solar]

can you show me how you would do it?>

[vocal nymph]

Ok lemme get to my desk

[sweet solar]

thank you bro

[sweet solar]

give me a bit, i will go pray an be right back

[vocal nymph]

ok

if you had a seperate column for the rules then write those there, but make sure its clear for which step youre using the rules for. (At least thats what I was taught)

[sweet solar]

what is co - res?

[vocal nymph]

coresponding

[sweet solar]

o

hmm i guess i see where you are getting it from

[vocal nymph]

i remember them being the angles that are literally identicle

but translated

[sweet solar]

honostly i think im stupid

[vocal nymph]

nah

[sweet solar]

i dont get this shit at all man 😭

used to be that lil nerdy kid

now i dont understand this highchool math

greatttt end of the year so far

cant wait for the test

the proofs ar eeven harder

hurray.

[vocal nymph]

youll do fine

[sweet solar]

no...

[vocal nymph]

see these are coresponding angles

[sweet solar]

yes thast at least i know 😹

probablyt the most simple part

[vocal nymph]

lol sorry

[sweet solar]

and the only part i get

nah

thats all i know basically

thanks for helping

but ig my brains just

[vocal nymph]

would you like me to go over the other ones again

[sweet solar]

not workin

hmm

lets try number 7 if you can

[vocal nymph]

alg

ok

sure

[sweet solar]

alrr

[sweet solar]

i cant use congruence thereom thing for 2x and 58?>

or an i

can'

[vocal nymph]

2x and 58?

[sweet solar]

mhm

i mean it should still form 180 right>

[vocal nymph]

yeah

[sweet solar]

you tryna hop on call to make this like

more easier ig

les typing and easier to explain

[vocal nymph]

can but i cant talk unfortunatley

[sweet solar]

alr alr alg

still greatful

[vocal nymph]

k

[sweet solar]

i spent an hour earlier tryna lok at youtube videos and shi

did not help

im that dense lol

anyways back to 7

2y and 58 are corresponding

[vocal nymph]

yep

[sweet solar]

while 58 and 2x are congruent

[vocal nymph]

idk about that lol

[sweet solar]

oh

what then

[vocal nymph]

can you explain why theyre congruent

[sweet solar]

cuz wont 58 plus 2x create 180

[vocal nymph]

yeah

[sweet solar]

wait congruent means the same

whats the term called uhh

i got the wrong name man

😔

[vocal nymph]

xD

alg

[sweet solar]

ciomplentary

yes

complementary

[vocal nymph]

not quite

what do complementary angles add to

[sweet solar]

i thougt they added to 180

they add to 90?

[vocal nymph]

yeah

[sweet solar]

oh

so what is the term for 180?

[vocal nymph]

supplementry i think

or easier way jsut say angles on a straight line add to 180 xD

[sweet solar]

oh ye

supple

[vocal nymph]

both are the same

[sweet solar]

i could put that?>

i thought proofs neeed like

the right terms and stuff

this and that thereom or sum 😭

[vocal nymph]

my teachers said we could do that

idk

maybe sick with propper terms

[sweet solar]

nah not mine

😔

like these terms

definitely

thereom

balbalbla.

property

etc

[vocal nymph]

damn bro

they're over complicating this

[sweet solar]

cant even cheat on these things.

i mean those are jst the terms ig

i just dont understand the whole point of proofs

if you can solve it why need to prove that you can solve it

like wtf

welp back to 7 off topic whoops

ima find y first

ik 2y = 58

so y = 29

[vocal nymph]

yes

[sweet solar]

and then 58 +2x = 180

so x = 66

the finding x and y arent hard forme aslong as i do it right

but i dont know how to like put it in two colums ig

my teacher stopped recording his lectures too

they were mad useful

[vocal nymph]

hmm ok

[sweet solar]

welp ig number 7 is done

9-12 is just really easyy

uhh

[vocal nymph]

wait

what were your proofs for 7

thats the hard part right

[sweet solar]

yeah..

waiot i didnt do that

bruhhh

😭

[vocal nymph]

relatable

[sweet solar]

what would my proof ber for

58 + 2x = 180?

supplementary sum

[vocal nymph]

yep

[sweet solar]

whats after like

the second part

suppplementary blabla

[vocal nymph]

that i dont know what your teacher wants

supplementary angles sum to 180?

[sweet solar]

nah its like

corresponding angles therem

or vertical angles congruence thereom

those type shi

[vocal nymph]

oh

[sweet solar]

man.

[vocal nymph]

i think its theorum

if youre not sure google it xD

[sweet solar]

i got freshman friends in precalc

fuck them

what makes them so smart bro

[sweet solar]

like they just put the math in then

oh

thanks

[vocal nymph]

yeah then heres the problem

do you say supple or congrugent

[sweet solar]

supple/

?

[vocal nymph]

ok

[sweet solar]

wait lemme read that agian

[vocal nymph]

(idk the answer, depends on what your teacher thinks)

[sweet solar]

yeah fuck that

[vocal nymph]

I was taught differently

[sweet solar]

man i wish i was one of those smart ass kids

but even the smat kids in my class dont get it

so im cooked

theres no cheating on proofs either

[vocal nymph]

honestly

[sweet solar]

cant just search it up like everythign else

[vocal nymph]

this is stupid

but hey

youll get there

[sweet solar]

useless

fuck those scientiest

and nasa people

fucking squigly line shit with number

😭

[vocal nymph]

xD

[sweet solar]

i cant even do this with straight lines

[vocal nymph]

lets try y

[sweet solar]

this what i gfot

ignroer the handwriting

used to always right in cursive and stopped so it kinda messed me u

p

[vocal nymph]

so rn you only have coresponding

which links these two

then you need to link that with 2y

[sweet solar]

how so

so corresponding links 2y and 58

that gives me y

[vocal nymph]

oh frick

sorry

[sweet solar]

lol

[vocal nymph]

I should not be qualified for this

youre right

[sweet solar]

😭

its chil

[vocal nymph]

youre getting the hang of it

[sweet solar]

man i swear every time i study late at it

it never fucking helps

i always end up clueless during the test some hwo

but then i studyt late cuz i dont fucking UNDERSTAND ANYTRHINGAKNGK

UHHH

[vocal nymph]

heres something

[sweet solar]

welp i think i did 7 right

hopefully

[vocal nymph]

as soon as theres something you dont understant

[sweet solar]

if not im moving on.

[vocal nymph]

go ask the teacher

[sweet solar]

uhh

[vocal nymph]

yes

[sweet solar]

me asking

[vocal nymph]

you did it right

[sweet solar]

would lik e be saying

hey can we rewind liek 2 weeks please

😭

[vocal nymph]

which is why you do it as soon as youre confused

cause this stuff adds up

[sweet solar]

in my defence

its first period

math

i dont weant to be there

[vocal nymph]

and dont go away until you understand

[sweet solar]

i dont want to be at school

[vocal nymph]

lol

[sweet solar]

i dont even want to be associated with it that early in the morning

[vocal nymph]

relatable

[sweet solar]

and i dont even get to study in school or shi

😭

welp

time ot try

10.4

[vocal nymph]

ok

[sweet solar]

wait lemme js

run through 10,.3 rq

oki

lets see here

so this is just asking if its parellel

should be decently easy but im not sure if i have to prove it

13 x and y are parellel because they are both perpendicular to z

[vocal nymph]

yes

is that how they want you to answer it

looking at the example

[sweet solar]

this part honostly i dont know

oh

i need a thereom

bruhh

whaton haeven is the trasnversal thereom

oh if its perp ig

[vocal nymph]

yep

[sweet solar]

aight im chil ig

this part is aight

thing is im gonna forget ot put these whe ni take the test

i just absolutely hate this shit man

why first period

i used to sit right in fron tof the teacher till like a mont ago

and now he flipped the class around so im all the way in the bakc so ofc im not paying attention for shit when the hard stuff i have no idea about starts

[vocal nymph]

you can ask him

tell him you're finding it harder to focus

if that doesnt work just say you cant see from back there

[sweet solar]

lol ig but i dont really want to do that at the samtime ykyk

[vocal nymph]

ok lol

[sweet solar]

i would need like

2 sentences this time

liek the xample ?

[vocal nymph]

yes

[sweet solar]

alr

so

line w and z are perp to x so uising the transversal thereom x and z are parellel

should work

and then same thing for x and y switch it with poerp to

actually

i think i may have done it wrong

because theres only right angles at the bottom left and topright

[vocal nymph]

ah

you can just use coresponding theorum

for either w or z

then since the 90 degrees is on the same line it doesnt matter

(or whatever your teacher told you to do)

[sweet solar]

i get what ur saying but at the same time i dont know how to interpret that into the sentance

[sweet solar]

based on everything we've been going over so far do you really think i payed much attention to the teacher 😹

kinda regret it now

but its his fault honostly moving me to the back....

half is his fault

[vocal nymph]

if hes not the guy to give out detentions go up to him and ask him reteach you the topic

[sweet solar]

hes the type of guy to NOT reteach you it and instead just say go ask your friends

😭

"Lines 'x' and 'y' are parallel because the angles marked with single arrows are corresponding angles and are equal. Lines 'w' and 'z' are parallel because the angles marked with double arrows are corresponding angles and are equal. This is based on the Corresponding Angles Postulate."

tryna understand this lol

[vocal nymph]

Corresponding theorem means line w is perpendicular to both x and y

[sweet solar]

basically what you said

but more

mathy

hmm

[vocal nymph]

ah

that makes sense

you dont say WHY they are

jsut say they are

:)

[sweet solar]

hm

welp

makes sense doesnt make sense

[vocal nymph]

like he just said

[sweet solar]

math never maths

wants me to sat why

but doesnt want me to say why

lesgur

[vocal nymph]

lines w and z have coresponding angles, and x and y have coresponding angles. this means that [ w and z ] and [ x and y ]are parralell to each other

[sweet solar]

icic

man

im fucjing failing this test

i hate this so so much

never have i hated math till proofs

always liked it because it easily doable in my head

now i gotta fucking prove this

[vocal nymph]

is this one important?

[sweet solar]

uhh its just like any other test

but my grades this semester are bad

my grades hav edropped to bs and a

and for math i never have bs

til now

[vocal nymph]

we'll get you an a

[sweet solar]

does not look like it cuz my brain is just not functioning.

[vocal nymph]

if there are, I find past papers very helpful

[sweet solar]

😔

[sweet solar]

nop

normally i watch his lectures

but suddenly he doesnt uplaod them anymore

[vocal nymph]

I'll go on you tube and find a guy thats doing it, pasue on each question and do them then watch his working

[sweet solar]

so thats just grat.

great

[vocal nymph]

damn

[sweet solar]

pasue?

[vocal nymph]

pause

[sweet solar]

o

[vocal nymph]

dont jduge

[sweet solar]

lol not judging i just coiuldnt make out what u were saying'

i thought u were tryna say puruse

[vocal nymph]

lol

[sweet solar]

prusue

pursue

😭

[vocal nymph]

I think this is more of a youre not getting enough info problem

[vocal nymph]

have you tried writing notes

[sweet solar]

eh

[sweet solar]

does NOT work for me

cant read my own handwriting

[vocal nymph]

ok

[sweet solar]

and it just never works

[sweet solar]

so amazing

my english teacher gave me a missing

on a test

i did

in her class

said shed fix it like 2 weeks ago

guess what she HASNTN AWI

[sweet solar]

it just sucks honostly

i used to go to a private school

was in the nerdy advance shit

i was in 4th grade learning stuff

and ive never had to study until this yar

year

and thats just completely fucked me over

idk how to study man.

[vocal nymph]

well better start trying new things now

does your teacher write on the board

[sweet solar]

uhh

write on paper

projects on board

[vocal nymph]

ok

either

[sweet solar]

he would record that

but now no more

[vocal nymph]

ask if you can have the paper, ask to take a photo of the paper, of have him post a picture of the paper

[sweet solar]

hmm will do ig

ill just ask him to record the lectures agian

i think he just thinks nobody uses them

[vocal nymph]

or maybe he thinks no one's watching his lectures. You could also ask him to start recording again'

yeah

[sweet solar]

ye..

they came in clutch

alot

nobody just raises their hands cuz probably embaressed

i probably didnt speak loud enough ig

well im going to finish this revierw assignment and head to sleep

thanks brother

[vocal nymph]

if you need anything you can ask

[sweet solar]

probably tripled or quadrupled my knowledge haha

[vocal nymph]

sorry for not providing decisive feedback

[sweet solar]

from nothing to somthing

[vocal nymph]

cya lol

[sweet solar]

what time for you

is it

'

[vocal nymph]

7pm

[sweet solar]

its 10 53 for me

[vocal nymph]

Ah lol

[sweet solar]

dam

where u at

im in cali

[vocal nymph]

I’m in nz

lol

16 hours ahead

[sweet solar]

what the

i thought u were 3 hours behind

ur a whole day infront of me basically

[vocal nymph]

Yep

[sweet solar]

gone ge tlike

20/40 tomorrow

!!!

🙏

[vocal nymph]

You’ll do fine

Double check

Don’t take shortcuts

You’ll do fine

[sweet solar]

wait bro

how do i do these

[vocal nymph]

Same as above

State L m n all have co responding angles

Same with a and b

So they must be parallel

) our examples of traversal

Or smth

[safe radish]

@sweet solar Has your question been resolved?

Channel closed

Closed by @sweet solar

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

[languid surge]

2 sinθ-4cosθ=0

[languid surge]

2sinθ=4cosθ

sinθ=2cosθ

sinθ/cosθ=2

sinθ/cosθ=tanθ

so

tanθ=2

tan^2θ=4

and also

[hazy elbow]

what are you trying to do?

[languid surge]

well i tried solving it

[hazy elbow]

solve for theta?

[languid surge]

and i got 2 different value of tan

[hazy elbow]

well, show the process

[languid surge]

ye ok

[meager merlin]

Well

[languid surge]

is it correct till now?

[meager merlin]

If tan theta = 2

[hazy elbow]

squaring both sides was an unnecessary step

after tan(theta)=2

[meager merlin]

Then u should get something along the line of n + 2* k *pi

[languid surge]

wait

lemme see

wait so what im saying is

[languid surge]

tan=2 is correct right

[meager merlin]

• 2kpi

With k (0< k < infinity)

[languid surge]

umm not following you

like i dont get what u mean

if tanθ=2 is correct

[hazy elbow]

are you aware of ITF

[languid surge]

no

[hazy elbow]

inverse trigonometric functions

like arctan

[languid surge]

nope

never heard of it

[hazy elbow]

then you shouldn't be solving it

[languid surge]

wait see this first

[hazy elbow]

you must have a bit of knowledge of it in order to solve for it

[languid surge]

now like so tanθ=2 is not correct?

i just need that confermation so i can show u the next part

[hazy elbow]

well you need to solve for theta right

[languid surge]

well no

[hazy elbow]

tan(theta)=2 is right

[languid surge]

im askin that only