#help-23
1 messages ¡ Page 216 of 1
i just realized
now
i only have one day to study for my real analysis 2nd midterm
đą
what did i do
the lin alg quiz ive got isnt even worth that much
holyyyyyyyyyyyy
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

fckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Pain 
okok
so plan is its already too late anyways rn im gonna sleep soon
so
ill finsih up lin alg, skim through the next chapterđ
take quiz
and then cram
ahhhhh what was I doing the few days before???
i dont think i was completely wasting my time??
i cant remember
Same
I really should've rested sooner 
Good question
you did do a bit I think 
đ yea... probđ
is the equivalence of dimension of the two basis enough to show that its isomorphic
sweet
Yep pretty much
in any case it's easy to create an actual isomorphism between them (e.g. send the diagonal entries to a corresponding vector)
I cant just skim through the next chapter..
its too muchđĽ˛
what's that referring to? 
Goodnight
sleep well 
.close
Closed by @tame zephyr
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In a 3D coordinate system (Oxyz) given the sphere (S)
<@&286206848099549185> reasking cuz i was not answered
if there is anything you need me to provide im more than welcome
@versed wave Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
this
Is that the whole question
yes
So what are u trying to solve
oh i forgot
find thr radius of this circle
alr Ill attempt the question now
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
i apologize for that
So I've done the working on a different program to ensure that u can read and understand it better bc my handwrighting is terrible.
So Im assuming that the first 3 photos were parts of the question and then u wanted me to find the radius of the sphere.
I got a different answer but I hope that helped
@versed wave U there ?
Hello
@versed wave Has your question been resolved?
you didnt do this
this is chatgpt
it was a test
but my work was questionablr
so thats why im asking
Yes I used Chat Gpt. That was the different prgogram. I didnt quite get it so I thought it would help u.
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
i appreciate your spirit, but i suggest you should know what you are truly doing
I apologise, but did it atleast help u in the slightest. Its fine if I get banned or kicked for using ChatGpt. I just felt bad when I saw that nobody answered ur questioned so I thought GPT wil help. Once again I do apologise for everything but did ChatGPT atleast help u in some way. PLs tell me it helped in some way.
Like was Gpt correct
TBH bro Im a y12 Student I got no clue abt this. I just felt bad when there was nobody answered ur question and knowing I ceratinly can't I used Ai.
uh no not really since i dont trust chatgpt in a slightest
you forgot to say that M is on the sphere
chatgpt cant even do a 5 term sum correctly, i aint trusting it
ye it's not a reliable resource. ISTG it even makes up numbers putta knowhere
oh yeah, what the question meant was the locus of all point M such that...
it doesnt necessarily belong to the sphere i believe
also is the * in there dot product of the vectors MB and MC or multiplication of the lengths MB and MC
dot product
so essentially i label M(a,b,c), after expanding iirc i got something along the line of
$a^2+b^2+c^2 +... = 4$
FungusDesu MSC2020 34A05
it was extremely similar to a sphere equation
but i cant figure out what to do with it
Ive graphed the possible coordinates for M, assuming M does not need to be on S, and the locus of M is ||the surface of a sphere||
you need to say more than just that
if it had the form of a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + ...ab + ...ac + ...bc + ... = 4, where ... are coefficients, then it is a sphere equation and you just didnt notice
thats what im confused at, the question did not specify M must belong on the sphere, yet the locus is a sphere
no
either way, would just finding its radius suffice?
the locus is a different sphere
it cant even be the same sphere
the locus if M must belong on a sphere is a circle, because a circle is the intersection of the surfaces of 2 spheres
hmm
so lets say we want to find the radius of the intersection circle of the two spheres
how to do so
i might redo this problem when i get home
typo earlier
a^2 + b^2 + c^2 + #a + #b + #c + G = 4 where # can be any coefficient, and G is sufficiently negative, is guaranteed to be a sphere
you should try this problem again now that you know that the locus of M (ignoring that M should be on S) is a separate sphere whose equation you can find
you should get that the equation of the locus of M (ignoring that M should be on S) is (x - ||1||)^2 + (y - ||1||)^2 + (z - ||0||)^2 = ||3||^2
seeing both the equation equation and the original S equation (x - 3)^2 + (y - 3)^2 + (z - 2)^2 = 3^2 should give you an idea on what their intersection must geometrically satisfy
remember that you only need the radius of the circle, you do not need an equation of the circle in 3D space
alright brb, i just got home and gonna redo this problen
@versed wave Has your question been resolved?
@versed wave Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @versed wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@left gyro thank you
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
hi any idea how to solve this
dya know surface of revolution formula?
no
do you even need that though
rotating the circumference just gives a spherical shell
its a semi circle
so we have to use pi
basically it just wants the surface area of the sphere that you get after rotating
ye
I can help if needed
sure
are you trying to do this question using calculus
is it really not just a spherical shell?
do you know the disk/washer method for calculating area
no its a semi circle
idk
but the semi circle rotated becomes a sphere
ryan you're correct
its a 2d circle
it's just the AREAf iaw90-kj f0-a wvk0-otk 0aw-powst of the sphere
try visualising the rotation
what do you suggest?
it would still be a 2d semi circle if it is rotated about z axis
that isnât even the calculator doing the rotation
thatâs just the plain circle with some extra lines to indicate that itâs 3D
the equation tells you the hight at every moment, so if you create a circle at ever dx and add the together then you get the surface area.
you can do this by using integrals
yeah thats what i suggested. but since its circle do i need to multiply by pi?
why can't we just find the area of the entire circle and just divide it by 2?
If you really wanted to evaluate it with integrals it would be integrating pi times (f(x))^2
correct surface area = (pi) * integral( the hight eqution )
wait pls
but like, why would you evaluate it with integrals if you could just pull out the formula for surface area of a sphere
not every equation has a standardied equation
thatâs just intentionally making your life harder
can someone please answer this
generality is good but we donât have to derive the same thing every time lol
guys
the answer is just 16pi

no
ok then ryan's idea is better
you basically have half perimeter of a circle rotated 360 degrees
that's a sphere
its not a sphier
why not
it is asking you to rotate the semi circle around the x-axis
like here
rotate x axis
not z
oh fuck im an idiot
so it is indeed a sphere
oh yeah i just checked you might be correct, since the document i found said the amount of area that been rotated
friend?
?
so um how do you solve it now we found out its a sphier?đ
surface area of sphere
ok
V = 4pir^2
so what about the x^2+y^2=4?
oh okok
ok thanks
@tough ravine Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tough ravine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does my logic look sound?
@oak violet Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @oak violet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Texit broke my post so here it is in all its awfully-formatted glory again
The bottom was saying "even though this definitely represents the capacitance at a given area covered by a dielectric, I feel like I'm supposed to integrate this, but what would the resulting sum mean?"
Anyway I just feel like I'm supposed to integrate this because of the way it comes together, but in the end I'm actually supposed to be finding the current $I=C \frac{dV}{dt}$, so I'm probably not actually supposed to
Haiku
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
texit please
I guess the integral of velocity isn't "the sum of velocities", but rather the displacement, so I guess I'm just confused on the whole "sum" aspect of integrals
Now that I know that taking the integral isn't correct, though, I can search for my actual question instead of asking it here
.close
Closed by @winged bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi can someone help me with the euler method for differential equations?
i dont understand what to do to calculate h when i have de exact solution of the problem
i endeed up with this, but dont know how to continue
should i replace x(t) for the exact solution or what should i do?
Thanks for translating!
it just says bound* in Spanish. I guess it would be an upper bound(?) Sorry, I don't know about ODE's
hahah no problem
thanks for the translation
its okey if i stay here till i found help or what would you recommend?
in 3 minutes you can ping helpers
svc20060505
its upper, sorry i didnt understand you before
i want to calculate the maximum possible error
how can i ping?
<@&286206848099549185>
nop, lo tengo que calcular sacando la cota creo, porque de ahi puedo despejar h que me da la cantidad de pasos indirectamente
hablas espaĂąol? jajajaj
ok
me descoloca un poco aca porque no tengo un tiempo final
asi que supongo que primero tengo que calcular el error
que es este
calcule la derivada segunda
pero despues estoy perdido con el tema de que acotar o como reemplazar
.
si efectivcamente esto esta en chino me rindo
jajaj
no pasa nada
se agradece la intencion
sabes si hay alguien por aca que sepa del tema para mandarle?
<@&286206848099549185>
sigo spameando esto hasta que llegue alguien jajaj
si pero para q lleguen
jajaj a quien apuramos? ah
svc20060505
onda la diferencia esa vendria a ser mi error
que es igual a lo que viene despues de la inequidad (no se como se dice)
onda el segundo termino vos queres que sea menor o igual a ponele en este caso 10^-2
tengo calculada la derivada segunda pero ahi me quedo porque no se bien que datos tengo que usar para reemlazar x(t)
puedo ver como obtuviste esa cosa rara de 4t2x(t)-2x(t) o algo asi
ahi te muestro
creo q el t desaparece porque es t = 1 $|x(1)-\text{approx}| \leq |x''(1)|\frac{h^2}{2}$
svc20060505
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import sympy as sp
x, t, x_sym= sp.symbols ("x t x")
x_func= sp.Function("x")
funcion= 2x_func(t)-5sp.sin(t)
def euler_error_truncamiento(funcion):
f_subs= funcion.subs(x_func(t),x_sym) #Me permite derivar mas facil
ft= sp.diff(f_subs, t) #Calculo derivadas parciales
fx= sp.diff(f_subs, x_sym)
df_2= ft + fx*funcion
df_2= df_2.subs(x_sym, x_func(t))
return df_2
euler_error_truncamiento(funcion)
siii
el t si medio que se como sacarlo
pero x(t) me mata
x(1) serĂa e^-(1)^2 ?
yo estaba pensando en eso
pero no siento que tenga mucho sentido
que use esa funcion para aproximaer
nose jajjaj
jajaja
yo tampoco
onda trate de resolverlo asi
y siento que tiene algo de sentido
pero no me termina de cerrar
bah no se en realidad
para vos tiene sentido?
pues siguiendo la definicion seria asi
ah no lei mal
seria t0 + nh
si
sabes q ignora esto
cierralo y vuelvelo a abrir para q quede todo mas ordenado haces la pregunta desde 0
con .close y .reopen
ya te lo paso
gracias!
Consider $x'(t) = -2tx(t)$, $x(0) = 1$, $t \geq 0$, where the exact solution is given by $x(t) = e^{-t^2}$
a) Using Euler's method to approximate x(1), find an upper bound in terms of the step h for the error incurred in the approximation.
b) What should be the value of $h$ to ensure |error| < $10^{-2}$?
c) Compute the solution at $t=1$ using the value of $h$ from (b), and compare the values of the approximation and the exact solution.
Gracias !!!
para q te atiendan mas rapido has esto
manda esta foto
que?
luego esta
y luego el latex
y mejor cierra este canal y abrelo en otro distinto
dnd
.close
Closed by @cinder cipher
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this done correctly? Evaluating limits with more than 1 variable and trying to prove they dont exist Thanks!
i wrote y^2 at one point should be y^4
nvm
noticed what i did wrong -> plugged in 1 instead of 0
.close
Closed by @crystal summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with 13-17? I wasnât here when we learned this and I got an 11/45 on the test, and itâs on the quarterly tomorrow. I think I can do the rest after getting help with the first couple
@still patrol do you have anything so far for those problems. Otherwise I might just have to type it out
also knowing the quadratic formula would be helpful on some of these
no, im not sure where to start
ik that
Am I just tired or is the answer for 13 not listed?
I didnt know it would help but I know the quadratic formula
I couldnt tell ya what the answer for 13 is
How would I use quadratic for 13 if there is no a b or c
get everything on the left first
8x^3-8x
when they ask you to solve for x an equation, they're usually asking for what value(s) of x does the equation equal to 0.
worst case, you plug the values given if you don't know what to od
for this, factor out an 8x first
You get 8x(x^2-1) which is difference of 2 squares, so 8x(x+1)(x-1) so the answers are 0, -1, +1
I think they typo'd A and meant to write 0 not 8
thanks for the catch, i thought they factored properly
@still patrol for 14, let x^2 = y and substitue y in. Solve for y using the quadratic formula, then solve for x
im so lost
15: factor out the s, use quadratic and consider the extra s you factored out
ok $a^4 -17a^2 + 16$
Fuzzy_Alpaca
you just "see" that it factors into
$(a^2-16)(a^2-1)$ or let $x = a^2$, so you have $x^2-17x+16$
Fuzzy_Alpaca
i'll try to ask my teacher about that one tomorrow because I am still confused
and factor $x^2-17x+16$ via the quadratic formula to get the zeros: x=16,x=1. This gives you $a^2 = 16$ and $a^2 = 1$, so $a = -4,4,-1,1$
Fuzzy_Alpaca
ok
im going to try 15 and I will send a picture of what I have
@still patrol 15 I already mapped out. 16 is straightforward. 17 is a toughy. $a^3+b^3 = (a+b)(a^2-ab+b^2)$ and $a^3-b^3 = (a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2)$. Use the first property, and it's good to know off the top of your head with the second property. Either memorize it or figure it out on the spot.
Fuzzy_Alpaca
whats first and second property?
the two aforementioned equations
@still patrol Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @still patrol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im trying to find the eigenspace of this matrix and this is what i have so far. what do i do next?
and when im doing the nul space am i supposed to bring the matrix to REF or RREF?
you can row reduce if you want to, but you only have one nonzero row so you can just work with it directly
2x - 4y = 0
where x,y are the components of an eigenvector
you just need a nonzero solution
so i just need 1 row of only 0's in which i dont have to continue the nul space?
and what do i do with the C1 and C2 thing?
the row of only 0's tells you nothing, it's just 0=0
well using your C1/C2 notation, it's:
2C1 - 4C2 = 0 ,right?
any C1/C2 that satisfy this (as long as they're not both zero) is a valid eigenvector
so just pick a number for C2 and find the corresponding C1
but i thought you're supposed to use numbers from the last matrix
like x -2y = 0
that's the same thing
as 2x - 4y = 0
one equation is just 2 times the other equation
they have the same solution set
so i can use numbers from the 1st or 2nd matrix in any case?
yes
either way, there are infinitely many valid solutions (any nonzero scalar multiple of an eigenvector is also an eigenvector)
that is reflected in the fact that you have two unknowns but only one equation
so you have one degree of freedom
@crystal badger Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone tell me how this is wrong?
I flipped the answers and its still wrong
like I wrote it as -0.89 and 1.33 and that showed up wrong too
.close
Closed by @prime mason
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
maybe try fractions
the answer above is in fractions
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help in this
What have you tried
What did you get after using lhopital
ya I also thought that
yes how to calculate it
What is the defining property of an inverse function?
the function should be bijective to have inverse
Yes
smidgin
yes
Let's make use of this fact to find (f^{-1}(x))'
Just differentiate both sides
What do you get?
smidgin
yes
smidgin
yes
smidgin
Which is what we wanted
then how to find derivative of f^-1(8x)
Chain rule
can you give me a solution for this question
There are solutions on the internet, i was trying to help you get to it on your own
thanks I got my mistake now
@solar gust Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @solar gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
could i get help with lagrange error bounding
pleaser
@woeful agate Has your question been resolved?
Shibababarr
@woeful agate Has your question been resolved?
what's the problem?
I just need the general way of solving problems doing it, I do not have any examples on hand but can find some
@woeful agate Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey guys just want some clarification on this: (the range of g is [0, sqrt(3/2)]
γ and δ would equal to the range of g right? and to find ι and β it must equal the codomain? pls :')
@hollow elbow Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> sorry for the ping
@hollow elbow Has your question been resolved?
you are correct
alright thank you!
how to ask help i'm new in discord , i want help to calcul this intĂŠgral
Closed by @hollow elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if the green angle is a right angle, p+36 is also a right angle
adjacent angles on straight line
q=36, p = 90-36. r = 180-36
i think youre supposed to say how to do it
it's so obvious
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
why do u have to do 90-36
Do you understand why q=36?
do you agree p+36 = 90
ohhh
what about these ones then
these are so hard
and ive got a exam tmr
A line is 180 degrees, on that line we have 3 angles
180 = 90 (given) + p + 36
We can subtract 90 to simply get
90 = p + 36
for J look for isosceles triangle
for C use vertically opposite angles
for E use sum of interior angles of parallel lines = 180
for F use adjacent angles on straight line
ohhh
wait what wdym
wait so what would be the equation onn my paper
im kinda confused on how u figured it out
u mean the proof?
yeah its so confusing
i meant for e
E+C=180
how did u find e
E=180-C
p = 54, q = 36 and r = 144
wait but howd u know it was 180
because the lines containing C and E are parallel
what is e here?
therefore the sum of the angles inside it are 180
i'm proving that the sum of x and y are 180
wait so parallel lines are 180
you can just draw an imaginary line somewhere east of x and y to turn this into a quadrilateral. and by it's angle sum property we know that all angels of a quadilateral add upto 360. The line that you drew will be 90+90 thats 180 so the left is 180
my proof also works soo
sure i guess
yea i mean i will just giving an alternate approach since V seemed to have trouble understanding
7th grade? how old are you?
13
i see
I learnt this in 7th grade too
basically consider the four angles of a square right? what do the four angles in a square add upto?
360
ok
yes
what do all the angles in a quadilateral add upto ?
very good
now as you can see the angles in the quadilateral ABCD in the diagram i just showed also add upto 360
two angles are 90. C and D
so that's 90+90+x+y = 360
this means that x+y = 180
do you understand it now?
ohh yes
wait but im still confused on like how you got e
like for E
what is E?
this one
consider reading this
this explains it pretty nicely
think i got it on just E it would be 37 because 180-143
but how would you find G
to find G you would have to first find H which is 96. Then you will find F which is 180-37-85. Then you will subtract F and H from 180 to get G
that's not it entirely but i guess this is something you will learn with more practice
can u teacch me how to do g
@stark jackal this right here is how you do G
how did u find h
it is extremely obvious that H is 96 because of the 48 and 48 being added together
how did u know to add 48 and 48 tho
as you can see that the lenght of the two sides of that triange are equal. An unnecessary detail but since we know that the total angle of a triangle is 180, we are left with J being 180-48-48. Now H and J lie on the same like which means that H+J = 180, implying that H = 180-J. But we already know that J = 180-48-48. So H = 180 - (180-48-48) = 180 - 180 + 48 + 48 = 96.
you should go back and learn basic properties of a triangle
@stark jackal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @potent seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
<@&268886789983436800> google translate says that was very naughty..
mere moments before I got the mute...
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
$f(x) =
\begin{cases}
\frac{e^{3x}-e^{-5x}}{x} & \text{if x =/= 0}
k & \text{if x = 0}
\end{cases} \newline
\text{is continuous at x = 0 for the value of k as?}$
this channel is now closed, open a new one
ok this must work
see this
oh i totally missed that message i am so sorry
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was watching this physics video and I swear they did the math wrong. This isnt right is it?
sure dont seem right
no itâs just that tan(theta)=tan(theta+180) so you have this really stupid thing where arctan only spits out -90 to 90
yeah I get it now
it's not stupid, it's so that it's a function, it can only have 1 output
:p
thanks
.close
Closed by @urban vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
itâs really annoying to account for sometimes lol
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
cut the area
I'm working right now, at the moment I can give you a hint but cut it like this and use the formulas for the area of the trapezoid and a rectangle (yeh urs is better)
k peace
yeah
You know how to compute the area of those right
the height of the triangle is not 3 cm
Whatâs the length of the black line
Vertical one
the one that aligns with the triangleâs height
use the other vertical lengths to find it
and you can consider it with the 3 cm above it too
close
on the left you see that the 5 cm+3 cm would be the same as the 3 cm and the black line
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What would be a good mathematical statistical analyze to get an idea to go buy or short on a stock or forex market on that practicular day ? based on past data
lagrange polynomials are generally good for predicting stuff based on past data
I think I remember seeing the Black Scholes/Merton equation
Apparently it was used to tell whether a stock was worth investing in
Cool thanks alot i need to research that terms never heard off đŞ
@cedar tiger Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have been stuck on a few questions like this for ages and i am following the videos and still cant get it
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is the absolute value dropped for y at the end?
<@&286206848099549185>
think about it this way, c times the absolute value of y means the same thing as c * y & c*-y right?
Isn't absolute value not supposed to have negative
?
is it because it doesnt matter since is +/-C
The only way I can think of it going away is if the y being positive is implicit
It's occupied
how you tryna answer a question abt calc and then post a 5th grade problem đ
kidna
kinda
the sign doesnt matter bc the sign is a constant
at least afaik
wait actually one second
i think im mistaken
With what
you can kinda get rid of it
by skipping a step
subtract c2 from both sides
c2 being xâs constant
Yes
constant minus a constant is js a constant
ok
So c1 is c2-the constant for 1/y
i thought about the absolute value thing and i think im still right
my professor said you dont need it because its still a constant anyway
your professor is wrong then????
What is still a constant anyway?
you just combine them c1 and c2 and it become c3
your js skipping a step
oh dear đ
are you in calc 2
I meant what he was referring to
Like it sounded like he said that integral of 1/x is a constant in of itself
Which sounds wrong
i can near promise you he didnt say that
unless idk what im talking about
Also I am not in Calc 2
i just finished calc 2
what????
what calc is this
2
omg
What
im mixing people up
Mixing who up
i thought you were op
Nope
youre propably right though bc it makes sense
Would I drop the absolute value in this case bc of the constant or bc itâs a root? @snow goblet
Which is the problem ?
This is the problem correct?
yeah. the the answer is Csqrt(x^(2)+32)
i just want to make sure my understand and reasoning is correct
@wicked hull Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @wicked hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
let f be a function given by f(x)=lnx. ďťżWhat is the approximation for ln(3/2) ďťżfound by using the line tangent to the graph of f at x=1?
How do i do this
find the equation of the tangent
@loud osprey Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I need some help with this equation (looking for a)
This is basically what I've gotten so far... Prob wrong tho I was sadly missing on the lesson we my teacher explained this
that all looks correct to me I think?
youâve correctly calculated the integral and found the area in terms of a
youâve gotten a quadratic in a now, so youâll need to solve that (eg try factorise - if that doesnât work then use the quadratic formula)
then youâll probably get two solutions, as we are told a>0 we will choose the positive one
I think I'm just to dumb to solve the last part
The question is a bit tricky imo. The integral gives the signed area, which means that any area below the x-axis will be negative.
Haha
Instead of setting it equal to 7, try setting it equal to -7
Yes true I think you have to use the absolute value (idk what the right term is in English)
Yeah you could do that too
thats probably more right as it works for any general case
Yeye I think my problem is just with simple algebraic manipulation (again idk the English term sry)
In the last part so the a/4-a^2/2=7
ooh ur right my bad!
nice spot
so their point was that it should be =-7 not 7, since the area is negative
so from here you can simplify to get a quadratic
so -2a^2 + a + 28=0 i think?
and from here you can apply the quadratic formula
Yeah I think you're right Dahm so my problem was that I didn't pay attention in 7th grade hahahaha
To dumb to simplify
Thy a lot for your help tho both of you â¤ď¸
ok so we have
a/4 -a^2/2 = -7
same as
-a^2/2 + a/4 = -7
adding 7 to both sides
-a^2/2+a/4+7=0
multiply by 4
-2a^2 + a + 28=0
no worries :)
Thy for explaining!
2 am for me now, gotta catch some sleep for the exam
.close
Closed by @fleet axle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
someone guide me through this problem?
it's not hard
there are 12Ă11Ă10 ways to buy three plants
you can divide by 6 but it's not even necessary
how many ways to buy 3 female plants? @late briar
56 ways?
you divided by 6
12 x 11 x 10 = 1320
then we should also divide the total, so there's 220 ways
220 total, 56 all female
find all male
subtract, and you get "both types"
4 = all male plants?
yeah
so divide 160 by 220 and that is the answer?
very good
Closed by @late briar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help finding the derivative. Idk what I did wrong
You wrote 4x instead of 4^x
Closed by @remote crag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
- A point charge at the center of a
sphere contains an electric field of 1.25 â106N/C
from a distance of 0.150m. Calculate the chargeâs magnitude passing through the
surface of the sphere if it has a radius of 0.150 m
I am assuming this is a physics question?
yes
You might find more help in #old-network
I have tried solving it, just came here to check
I actually find more help here because there's more active people in this server đ
@gritty umbra Has your question been resolved?
@gritty umbra Has your question been resolved?
<siunitx>
so i guess [
1.25\210^6 ;\t{V/m} =\41{4\pi\eps_0} \4q{(0.150 ; \t m)^2}
]
and solve for $q$?
is that the same as $K\frac{q}{r^2}$
drutus
But I used gauss' law
yes
right. I don't think i quite understand how your question is written
can you show me like a picture of the question
right okay so i guess they want you to use Gauss's law
yes
so by "calculate the charge's magnitude passing through the sphere" are they asking you to calculate the flux?
the wording really seems hideous from my perspective
yeah I don't get it too
but like [
\oiint \vj E \vd \vc*n \dd A = \4{Q_{\t{enc.}}}{\eps_0}
]
The flux is independent of your surface's shape or size or whatever
do the flux is going to be Q/epsilon
now if they want you to calculate the charge's magnitude
oh what form of Gauss's law did they teach you
the general formula that we use is electric flux = EA = Q_enc/Epsilon thing
this is the same as this again because coulomb's law and Gauss's law are equivalent
this seems fine
okay, thank you!
@gritty umbra Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gritty umbra
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

,rccw
he meant x
what's the next step
i need to find position travelled from the car stopping
which came out as 2025/7 - 2025/2
just a tip for your working write the unit at the end not while you're doing the calculations it makes it hard to read
it helps me keep track of the units im in, id rather get correct units
but you're calculating distance. the only unit you need is the m at the end
it comes out as positive for me
okay so what did i do wrong?
everything but the 2025 x 7 ive done by hand
if you get a calculator in the test don't do it by hand - just substitute the values into the formula and you will always get the right answer
alright, he grades off of work shown so i like so show all the steps so if i did setup wrong i still get points. But ill def do that to check my work
.close
Closed by @royal mulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if you have a number k, then find the closest number that is n^2 + n to k, why does sqrt(k) roughly equal n?
closest integer?
what is n actually?
an integer
it can be zero then
actually, does integer or real n matter here?
so its n^2+n ~ k
you find n after being given k
yeah
okay what if k = 9
then what will we do
because i dont understand it clearly
n=2 or 3 i guess? both 3 away, i think the tiebreaker isn't exactly relevant
and if you allow real n then obviously just solve
so âk = n?
yes roughly
okay what is the question then
why is that the case?
really how?
just want to define and it's defined
well yes but that's not a given, they want to know why sqrt(k) ~= n
and the answer is probably just that n/n^2 = 1/n ~ 0 (insert limit argument here) so (n^2+n)/n ~ n = k/n so k ~ n^2
yeah
okay
laziness for approximately equal, it's not an actual notation
but why 1/n â 0
complete the square
1/n is asymptotically 0 which is why i said limit argument
sorr to interrupt, i know we are helping tonnes of help in this channel, but heres my thought:
consider
n²+n=n(n+1)=(n+0.5-0.5)(n+0.5+0.5)=(n+0.5)²-0.25
if we take squareroot, we will have
sqrt((n+0.5)²-0.25)â(n+0.5) when n is large
ohhhhh it's becuase it's pretty much asking what is the closest sqaure
why do we think this way?
so ofc it is near the sqrt
it is asymptotically â either
specifically here the important part is that n compared to n^2 is negligibly small for large n
i really should latex but im too tired today
okay but why did we choose large n
yeah makes sense, but will it get more inaccurate the larger the number?
or stay the same, because n will always be to small compared the n**2
because k can be anything you want, and that argument shows that as n gets larger and larger the approximation only gets better (if n^2+n < 1.0000001n^2 then it's more accurate than a value of n where 1.0000001n^2 < n^2+n < 1.5n^2)
you can quantify the error better if you straight up solve the quadratic and look at the roots
well in my case k is a semiprime but i don't think that matters to much
whatever, i still dont understand what is the question and what they want from us and why do we think like this
Closed by @steep yacht
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do q6
1/2mu^2 = 1/2mv^2 + mgh
v^2 = u^2 - 2gh
T - mgcos(theta) = mv^2/r
Thatâs all Iâve really got
For h I have 0.3(1-cos(theta))
@urban eagle Has your question been resolved?
@urban eagle Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @urban eagle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Determine concretely the elements of the set [C = {x \in \mathbb Z \mid |z| < 35 \text{ and } \exists a, b \in \mathbb Z:x = a^3 - b^3}.]
Does anyone have a hint for this?
I tried out a = 1, then b = 1, b = 2, ...
Then a = 2, then b =1, b=2, ...
And saw what I got
Maybe I just looked at too little
Maybe we can just list all the cubes up to 50 or so
Then look at their differences
$1, 8, 27, 64, 125, 216$
7, 26, 63, 124, 216
19, 56, 117, 208
37, 98, 189
61, 152
91
How are the differences that?
I looked at 1 first
difference from 1 to 8, difference from 1 to 27, difference from 1 to 64
Then at 8
etc.
Ohk

