#help-23
1 messages · Page 203 of 1
thats a word i like
the amount of profit you make with a single instance of machine C is given by [
(0) + (0 + 1) + (0 + 1 + 2) + (0 + 1 + 2 + 3) + \dots = \sum_{m=1}^{n} (0 + 1 + \dots + m-1) = \sum_{m=1}^{n} \sum_{k=0}^{m-1} k] which is
[= \sum_{m=1}^{n} \frac{(m-1)m}{2}]
m and k are just indices of summation
n is the total number of time steps that have elapsed
Namington
now youre trying to solve [\sum_{m=1}^{n} \frac{(m-1)m}{2} \geq 100n] since machine C' produces 100 dollars every second, times $n$ seconds
Namington
i would strongly recommend just doing this with a calculator
but if you wanted to do it by hand
you get [\sum_{m=1}^{n} (m-1)m \geq 200 n \implies \sum_{m=1}^{n} m^2 - m \geq 200 n] and we can break up the sums to [\sum_{m=1}^{n} m^2 - \sum_{m=1}^{n} m \geq 200 n]
Namington
now $\sum_{m=1}^{n} m^2 = \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6}$ and $\sum_{m=1}^{n} m = \frac{n(n+1)}{2}$ are both well-known formulae
Namington
substituting that in gives [\frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}{6} - \frac{n(n+1)}{2} \geq 200n]
Namington
from here its just algebra
[n(n+1)(2n+1) - 3n(n+1) \geq 1200n] and thus expanding and simplifying [2n^3 - 2n \geq 1200n] which is [2n^3 - 1202n \geq 0]
Namington
from here we can assume $n \neq 0$ and divide out by $n$ to get $2n^2 - 1202 \geq 0$, i.e. [n^2 \geq 601] which gives $n \geq \sqrt{601}$
Namington
now $24^2 < 601$ while $25^2 > 601$
Namington
so 25 is the minimum number (amount of time) such that buying machine C is better than buying C'
for machine B the math is similar but much easier (fewer steps, less indices to track)
youd get 20 at the end
i will mark this as unoccupied?
eh before that ill just leave with a
more realistic problem that would be in a roblox game
oh whoops youd get 21
slight indexing error on my part
just cause i was printing t-1 instead of t
close enough though
its literally just solving (n-1)n/2 >= 10n
which gives n² - n ≥ 20n, i.e. n ≥ 21
anyway i would not solve these algebraically
i'd write a simulation
much nicer
or a spreadsheet if you prefer those
advantage of spreadsheets is that theyre easier to check for errors (like the indexing errors i made)
since they display info more visually
Machine A makes 1$/t
Machine B makes 1A/t
Machine C makes 1B/t and decreased the tickspeed by 2 ms
Machine D makes 1C/t and multiplies the money Machine A makes by 1.1x
Machine E makes 1D/t
a tick is a one second. it can only go down to 500ms before it stops.
Machine E¹ makes 100000/s
When does the first set of machines, starting with Machine E have a more total money than Machine E¹?
problem 2(definitely a problem for a computer to brute force)
Machine A makes 1/s, and costs 10$, scaling to be about 1.1x more each time.
Machine B makes 1A/s, costs 75$, and scales 1.15x each time.
Machine C makes 1B/s, costs 500$, and scales 1.2x each time.
Machine D makes 1C/s costs 5000$, and scales 1.25x each time.
Machine E makes 1D/s costs 75000$, and scales 1.3x each time.
Machine E¹ makes 1 Million per second.
How fast can you have more money than Machine E¹?
closing ticket
ok yeah this is the kind of problem i'd 100% just write a program for
i can do that quick
"more money than E¹" meaning like
yes like total money
how fast does the amount of money generated by purchasing a single E exceed the amount generated by purchasing a single E¹?
or are you re-investing your money
oh oops
for problem 2
you start with 0$ and have a single Machine A
and Machine E¹ is always just there
.close
Closed by @little glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does the counting process count as a sequence? it would be $N:\mathbb R^+ \to \mathbb N_0$ which looks like it has a nicely well ordered domain
Frosst
A sequence is a function whose domain is N (except possibly a few first values)
Potentially a countable domain
But not R
Also, what's the counting process ?
Cause that sounds ungoogleable to me
Scrolls down to page 35, then to page 2
perhaps they define it more in another chapter but i dont see it in this chapter
haha
i found this on another page
You could consider the sequence tn of the arrivals
Assuming they're infinite (or accept finite sequences)
well that's the point
it's saying there are 3 ways to look at this arrival process
1 is to look at the time of each arrival in a sequence
1 is to look at the interarrival time between each occurence in a sequence
a counting process is defined on $\Omega \by [0, \infty)$
and the last is to consider the counting process
i suppose here we are just considering Ω to have only 2 events
It's the set of all possible sequences of arrivals
$N:\Omega\times [0,\infty) \to \mathbb N_0$ where $(A,t) \mapsto N(A,t)$? where A is how much you count the even that occured?
Frosst
from 0 to time t?
well where's this thing from Ω
A is the reality/distribution you consider
idk just some symbol
,, (\omega, t) \mapsto N(\omega)(t)
like what do you do with the input from Ω
i can count different events happening?
say you take Ω to be the canonical space
,, \Omega = \set {, \omega : [0, \infty) \to \Z_{\ge0} \where \text{$\omega$ is non-decreasing},}
oh i see, this w depends on what you're actually counting
then you can just take the canonical process [ N : \Omega \to \Omega, \quad N(\omega) = \omega ]
ω is then one particular path taken
N(ω)(t) = ω(t) would be what we typically write as N_t
another could be how many times the light turns green
and it would just depend on what im counting to determine which ω im looking at
i mean each ω is just abstractly some possible count of something over time
right
and the probability measure you put on Ω will decide what the distribution of the canonical counting process is
that sounds like it makes sense

hold up, why does the counting process have a distribution
i mean it must right
im told processes are not RVs and dont have a distribution
well
im told processes are just a sequence of RVs
depends on how you interpret it
this N is a measurable map (Ω, F) -> (Ω, F), for some sigma algebra F on Ω of your choosing
you should assign probabilities to this measurable space to know how N behaves
each outcome is a path itself
right, depending on how i choose the measure, the measure of N would change
and that's the part where we go P(N(t) = n) which is asking what's the measure of the preimage of n under N at some t
you can probably relate this to finite dimensional distributions or something
oh it wouldn't be the measure of N itself but rather the preimage of the outcome
oh and then f_N(n) = P(N(t) = n) would make that a distribution and most definitely depend on P?
you can also view N as a map [ (\Omega \by [0, \infty), \FF \by \BB([0, \infty)) \to (\Z_{\ge0}, \PP(\Z_{\ge0})) ]
no like
in this view
each N(ω) is an entire path
so you'd be talking about [ P(N \in A) ] where $A$ is a collection of paths
like for example
[ P(N(t) = n)] has [ A = \set {, \omega : [0, \infty) \to \Z_{\ge0} \where \omega(t) = n,} ]
right it's all the different paths that can also result to having n counts at time t
if you take this view, you're thinking of each outcome of the sample space given you a single value of N at time t
is the F x B part the events and some time interval
like that's just some suitable sigma algebra on the sample space
the x isn't actually cartesian product
it's some weird sigma algebra product thing
yeah
so just all the events and time interval we can measure
pretty much
so as you said just some suitable sigma algebra right
well it depends on what you want to measure i guess
there's probably a very canonical one for the Ω i defined
which will just be the borel sigma algebra
since Ω is actually a metric space
how do you know it has a metric
so are counting processes RVs then, they go from a sample space to a measurable space N_0
this looks mighty like a measurable map that might as well be an RV
@dull sequoia Has your question been resolved?
im also kinda confused what this set notation is
{N(t) ≥ n} is a set, it contains numbers bigger than or equal to n, so it could look like {n, n+2, n+3, n+5}?
or is this more like ${N(t) \geq n} = \text{preim}_{N}([n, \infty))$
Frosst
but where did the t go, i can't put N(t) at the bottom or that would become the value in the codomain and not a map
Closed by @dull sequoia
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
well thats how you integrate constants
Closed by @drifting skiff
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
helo
@brazen parrot Has your question been resolved?
@brazen parrot Has your question been resolved?
@brazen parrot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so im looking at poisson processes, and im up to the proof of this theorem
but how do i do that
Frosst
or at least how can i tell from just the information that X is a memoryless RV
@dull sequoia Has your question been resolved?
@dull sequoia Has your question been resolved?
These are obviously not independent. Because if we give concrete values, like, for instance z = 3 and t = 2, we have if X_1 > z then it's always greater than t.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ive applied the sin 2x identity and the cos 2x identity
@craggy island Has your question been resolved?
@craggy island Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how are you getting thje 120/126
Closed by @dense wadi
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
do you know what is the scaling factor?
it is 2:3 i think
good job
no
I mean 3/2
yes
Can I find y by doing 2/3 = 3 square root 2/y
yes that looks right
Closed by @next flower
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@granite cobalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Are you familiar with the Cauchy Inequality?
no
$\left(\sum_{i}a_ib_i\right)^2\leq\left(\sum_{i}a_i^2\right)\left(\sum_{i}b_i^2\right)$
sqrt(x,y,z)^2=x,y,z
i dont really get what you mean
oh wait I messed up the inequality
PajamaMamaLlama
This is the corrected one
In this case, $(\sqrt{x}^2+\sqrt{y}^2+\sqrt{z}^2)\left(\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}\right)^2+\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{y}}\right)^2+\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{z}}\right)^2\right)\geq\left(\sqrt{x}\cdot\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}+\sqrt{y}\cdot\frac{1}{\sqrt{y}}+\sqrt{z}\cdot\frac{1}{\sqrt{z}}\right)^2$
PajamaMamaLlama
@granite cobalt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
oh this i responded to this in an older channel
so basically
MNS ~ RTS right?
since it’s perpendicular bisector TN = NS
so then since TS = (TN + NS) = 2NS the scale factor is 2
then reverse this argument to prove that RM = MS therefore M is the midpoint of RS so it is a median
oh wait do you know what similarity is?
oh lol i didn’t see that
ok
so
you have to prove that RM = MS
if your geometry textbook has some kind of theorem for proving this with right angles then use that
well uhh
how do we know if
RS = 2MS
...
we are using congruency
so either add angles or add segments
yeah
try to make somehow angles 45 degrees
sorry i just learned similarity lol
sorry about that, but we are not using similarity
yeah
congruency over
proving a right triangle is like
if two angles are supplementary and congruent
both angles are right
@lean otter
yout here
yeah
is the pythagorean theorem allowed?
nvm
is there trig?
so to prove that <RMT ~= <SMT will prove it
yeah i thought so
ooh <TRM and <NMR must be supplementary
so
ooh i think i’ve got it
and <NMR and <NMS must be supplementary too
so therefore <TRM and <NMS are congruent
so the angles of the triangles are 45 degrees
oh wait
and NMR is congruent to itself
yeah nvm i made a mistake srry
oops
basically
if MN is perpendicular bisector of TS
TN = NS and MN is perpendicular to TS making
<TNM and <SNM
both congruent and right
yes
if i remember correctly 2 angles supplementary to the same angle are congruent?
yeah but here’s why
so the angles of a quadrilateral must add up to 360 degrees have you learned that? if not i can fix it to not use that
nope
ok
they are supplementary to the same angle, <NSM
ok
wait can i finish it first
yeah
wait what if <X is complementary to <Y and supplementary to <Z does this mean something?
ok
i’m working on it
i’ll try what time
i’m in eastern us time so i can help u tmr (for me)
ye
i have to pass it
i’ve proved that <TRM sup. < NMR
how?
so basically <TRM and <S are sup. and <NMS and <S are sup so <TRM ~= <NMS then <NMS and <NMR are sup. so <TRM sup. <NMR
but I need to prove RM = mS
yeah
so now we have to prove that RM = TM or <MRT ~= <MTR
isoceles
YESS I HAVE IT
ok so <TRM + <RMT + <TMR = 180
repost the problem pls
but finally <MTN + <MTR = 90 substituting should prove that <TRM ~= <MTR i think
its a right triangle
the angles of a triangle sum to 180 degrees therefore the other 2 angles of a right triangle sum to 90
no not that
well they can be congruent
ok i’m gonna try to construct a proof outline now
<R + <S = 180 given
<NMS + <S = 180 given
<R + <NMS = 180 substitution
<TMN + <MTN = 90 right triangle other angles are sup.
<MTN + <MTR = 90 given
<TMN ~= <MTR substitution
RM = TM isoceles
TM = MS “given”
RM = MS
rough draft
@frigid coyote Has your question been resolved?
@frigid coyote Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @frigid coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i calculate the gradient and hessian?
the second partial derivatives, needed for the Hessian, can be calculated analogously
@primal condor Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @primal condor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i ask physics 1 type questions here
in an action-‐adventure film, the hero is supposed to throw a grenade
from his car, which is going 90 km/h, to his enemy’s car, which is going 110 km/h.
The enemy’s car is 30 m in front of the hero’s when he lets go of the grenade. If the
hero throws the grenade so its initial velocity relative to him is at an angle of 45o
above the horizontal, what should the magnitude of the initial velocity be relative to
the hero?
so i did the r = vo^2sin2theta
and solved for Vo but not sure how to get the magnitude of Vo
or is magnitude just Vo ? so confused
@wet gust Has your question been resolved?
@wet gust Has your question been resolved?
@wet gust Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just wanted to check if I have done this correctly as the textbook doesnt have answers for graphing questions
its right
Closed by @white mirage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would one go about doing this question?
the only way for a number to reduce in term of digits count is 10, 100, 1000..., and its prime so we can ignore -1
the question is asking how many digits in 2^74207281
when we say y = log10(x), what does x equal?
(for sake of convenience ill call log10 as just log)
@white mirage Has your question been resolved?
why can we ignore the -1 because its prime?
read again
x= 10^y?
correct
so when y = 1, x = 10
y = 2, x = 100
y =3, x = 1000
conversely, x = 999, y = 2.999
from this we can infer the pattern that floor(y) + 1 = number of digits of x
are you following?
ohhhhhhhhh
but we have base 2
now lets consider not x=10^y, but rather x=b^n
ok
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
that is, b and n are any number
so we got y = log(b^n)
and what does that equal?
@white mirage
as in like y=nlogb?
correct
putting this all together, the number of digits of b^n is 1+floor(nlogb)
now just plug in all the numbers and there you have it
ah i see
note, this only works if b and n are positive integers
otherwise its a different story, but thats far from what the original question is asking here
okok ty
I don't seem to be getting the correct answer
its close
because i typed it in wrong lol
and im assuming because of this we always round down
@white mirage Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @white mirage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am studying Pythagoras theorem and came across this problem,
what did you try
Idk really
I tried finding the distance from the 80m cable and the base
Like the distance between the base of the radio tower and the end of the 80m cable
and what did you get?
60m is the base distance
I think
Oh wait
I think it’s 78
M
<@&286206848099549185>
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
man, that question is confusing me... i cant get a straight image of what that question is tryna convey...
I can try draw if u want
One minute
ight
Yes
But I’m pretty sure the part of the left is 30m
Because the cable is 60m
And it connect the the tower 30m high
is that 80 the length of red or the height of it?
Height
ah ok
Trying to figure out length of X
If it helps I know the answer
It’s in the back of the book
Just not the solution
is the 60m the length of the green line too?...
No 60m is the length of the cables on the bottom
oh
ight sorry man, i couldnt solve it. good night
what
i don’t understand the hand writing
I can do better handwriting
the ratio between the small triangle and the big one is 1:2.666, since 80/30 gives us 2.666. so you just have to multiply the length 60 by 2.666 and it gives us the length of the bigger triangles hypotinuse.
That’s what I tried before
huh...
well im out, cya man
@shadow aurora
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"Consider the region bounded by the curves y= x/(x^2 + 3/4) and y = x
a. These two curves intersect three times; find the three points of intersection.
b. Find the area of the region bounded by the two curves in the first quadrant."
Posting this again because in the last channel I didn't get any answer for an hour, hopefully that's okay. I'll send the work I've done in a second.
,w graph x/(xx + 3/4) and x
Yeah your work looks good so far
Closed by @misty ember
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do this question?
if it were an equation could you solve it
factorise it, draw simple graph, solve from there
Is it a b^2-4ac equation?
yeh
Ohh
wait tho
Wait
Yeah sorry that equation is for something else I think
So I factorise it
And then and draw a graph?
X?
I don’t think you are supposed to solve for x
drawing graph here would be really helpful to solve the problem
tho u can jsut look at the roots and take intersection
If I can remember you do the b^2-4ac equation
its the same as factorization
the formula is
how many real roots
Is that one way to do it?
not for this case no
Right
if you're talking about the entire quadratic equation
yeah that could be used to find the 2 roots
to graph
but factorising it is quicker if you're familiar with how to factorise a non-monic polynomial
and you'll see the equation is just
(2x-5)(x+1)
and then graph that
and just see for what x values is the graph above the x axis aka (> 0)
and solve the inequality that way
once you plop it on, you can clearly see it holds true for x < -1 and x > 2.5
how did u get that
i do criss cross method
yeah i wrote down 3 on paper but i read it as a 5 lol
mb lol
wait hold up
yeah shit mb lol-
yeahh
no i completely fucked it up
oof-
Still sorta confused
u see its a quadratic equation right
ah snowflake can explain im going bed
degree 2
so theres basically gonna be 2 values of c
x
and the question is with the sign less than 0
so u basically find the common thing in the 2 values of x
this works ig but wavy-curve method is easier
Im not sure if he knows it
thats the easier one ik
u just put the plus minus stuff and get the negative sign here cuz les than
yea
What am I supposed to do?
but they way hes reacting on quadratic I thought of going with normal method
No clue
something used to solve inequalities
wait lemme show u how is it done
gimme 2 mins
@shadow grove here
Ah yeah I see it now
theres a whole lot of concept here
u gotta learn it as well
u want some slight idea about it?
That’s what u thought you do
u dont use that formula usually in inequalities to find roots
Ah right
Dunno
The graph is definitely a sad face yeah?
Alright cool
its a smily I think
if the leading coefficient
that is the coefficient of x^2 is positive its a smily
if it is negative its a sad
Good
Thanks
Np
?
whats the confusion
do u know the conditions for delta
aka discriminant
I cant understand that-
Do you know what a b and c are for this question?
Yes its clear
the coefficients
a = 4 b = 8-4k and c = 4-k
Thanks
np
@shadow grove Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is this integral equal to 0
surely computing this becomes: [x] upperbound = 4, lowerbound = - infinity
so you get 4 - (-infinity) which goes to infinity no?
You can't plug infinity into an equation
You can take a limit to infinity though!
like, definite integral 0 is just 0
well ok
i shouldn't say it's an exception really but yeah
i see, thanks
ikik, i was just being lazy haha
I've been taught to substitute R and say R tends to infinty/negative infinity
OH wait
yeah i had a brain fart moment lmao
.close
Closed by @finite iris
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone tell me what I did wrong here
Very first equation
,tex .wrong root
riemann
Try x=4 and y=9
oh yea
Dang
Originally I was thinking of doing trig sub, but I wanted to see where simplifying takes me but guess it didn’t work out
ty
.close
Closed by @kind beacon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me understand this
so i have the 3 areas
im just trying to understand how dividing by L then differentiating finds the optimum value
@lament echo Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @lament echo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I noticed a strange pattern when calculating various functions in the form of (x+1)^n. each one is has the derivative of the term with the greatest value added to it, along with a strange sequence. is there a reason that (x+1)^n has the second term of the polynomial as the derivative of x^n?
do you know the binomial expansion
yes
well it's just the second coefficient
but why is the derivative there
so n choose 1
so n
so it's just nx^(n-1)
it just happens to be there
i mean ok you could consider (x+1)^n - x^n as sorta a really crappy derivative
((x+1)^n - x^n)/1
that should be approximately nx^(n-1)
so it makes sense
wait did i just accidentally make a shitty derivative
lmaoo
the weird pattern i don't get though
depending on the number term it is, there's a relation to it's derivative
if you add the nth term's derivative, and divide it by n, you get the following term
i think it's just a coincidence
for example: x^{5}+5x^{4}+10x^{3}+10x^{2}+5x+1
d/dx (x^5) = 5x^4.
(d/dx(5x^4))/2= 10x^3
no
ok wait yeah
sure
but that's just because of the binomial thing again
i mean
i guess this is the statement that (x+1)^n is equal to its taylor series
or
x^n is equal to its taylor series expanded around x = -1, rather
or something like that
that's probably where i needa look
i don't really have a good understanding of taylor series
so
that's what im going to do
ty
.close
Closed by @glossy cypress
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The exponents have a common base
one way you could continue is by noting that…
3^n = 3^(n - 1 + 1) = 3^(n - 1) * 3^(1) = 3 * 3^(n - 1)
Closed by @river gate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what did i do wrong here: The question is 4 3/7 - 3 2/3. I first converted it to improper fractions which is 31/7 and 11/7, and then I minused it which is 20/7. which equals to 2 6/7. Now what
how did you get 11/7?
cause when u convert 3 2/3 to improper you get 11/7
uh no
oh fuck I mean
why would the denominator change?
/3
yeah just realized my dumbass
thanks bruh
idk how i missed that
thanks g
.close
Closed by @plain spear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
Yes I got that
@plain spear Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i prove that the sqrt(x) -> 0 when x -> 0
with the episolon delta proof
technically the (two-sided) limit of sqrt(x) as x approaches zero is undefined
this is because sqrt(x) is not defined for any negative x and so there are no open intervals containing 0 on which sqrt(x) is defined everywhere except possibly at 0
i meant for x^+
ok, so it's a limit from above?
or like
0_+
the limit where it can work
where it gets to 0.00000001 and not -0.00000000001
so the difference in a onesided limit is that instead of using $0 < |x-a| < \delta$ you use $a < x < a+\delta$. otherwise the approach is exactly the same as a two-sided delta-epsilon proof
rome of oxtrot
how so?
it wirtte ndifferently?
only in that one step, otherwise it follows the same pattern
a is the point we are going to and delta is positively small
intuitivitely, this limit is clearly 0
so what you need to do is show that for any $\epsilon > 0$, there exists a $\delta$ such that if $0 < x < \delta$ then $|\sqrt x| < \epsilon$
rome of oxtrot
is the play here to say delta = epislon^2
seems to me that that would work
@wooden oyster Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i solve this ?
if $$ RV = SV $$ then $$ 2x+8 = 6x - 4 $$ therefore $$ 6x - 2x = 8 + 4 $$ therefore $$ 4x = 12 = > x = 3 $$
The Mad Pirate
Ok but what about for angle RVU ?
$$ \tan(m/2) = RV/V = \frac{2*3+8}{3} = \frac{14}{3}$$
The Mad Pirate
The Mad Pirate
the result I get for m is 155,81048584597579749513266277056
@lilac drift first you need to find x, which will give you the oppsite lenght on the trianfle BEC, therefore cos(BEC/2) = BE/x , you can find BE as x*cos(BEC/2)
finding follows the same procedure than before, equate both linear equations and solve for x
you can check the result with the ,w solve command
,w solve 3x+6 = 5x-2
to get m is exactly the same way than the previous excercise
$$ m = 2*\atan(\frac{18}{4})$$
The Mad Pirate
@lilac drift are you getting the idea ?
.close
Closed by @lilac drift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Good
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
We learned a way to do this one but I forgot how to do it
ok is it ok if you solve it in a different way? bc idk which way you’re supposed to solve it my way involves a system of linear equations i think
if not wait for someone with better knowledge
I mean go ahead
ok
so you are looking for a_1 and d
such that
(a_1 + (4 - 1)d) + (a_1 + (5 - 1)d) = 75
and (a_1 + (5 - 1)d) + (a_1 + (6 - 1)d) = 93
ohhhhh yeah, it was this
solve this system note that there is a duplicated term which probably simplifies it i think
so for the 11th term, i got 52.125
what about a_1 and d?
ummm, a_1=29.625, d=2.25
it does not appear to be correct
Closed by @fiery mural
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ive figured out the first part how do I do the second part
showing theres no minimum with the constraint
@pearl vale Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pearl vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would i know to use the discriminant
helpers
<@&286206848099549185>
bruh
<@&286206848099549185>
i know the method
of applying b2-4ac
however
how do i know by just the fact that x is real i am able to use the discriminant and prove it
because i swear u can have a real number and not have it cross the x axis at all
<@&286206848099549185>
Hm
yo do u have answer?
oh i think i get it
because x cant be real if it doesnt touch the x axis
LETS GO
IT CLICKED
ALHAMDULLIAH
GOD GIVE ME EVERYTHING
GOLDEN AGE OF ISLAM
.CLOSE
.close
Closed by @rare dragon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
quick question is log (xy) = log x + log y
ye
Closed by @swift vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I solve this?
what did you try
It’s transformations
But I don’t know this, especially when it’s crossing the y axis
there's nothing special about the y axis in a sense
Idk