#help-23
1 messages · Page 192 of 1
i thought of this as well
not sure if i'm missing something lol
is it just 0?

weird
cant u just simplify it
that seems like it would be it, yeah
okay okay thanks
yeah its 0
did you check what i said in the other channel about there being an infinite # of vectors perpendicular to another one in R3? : )
i assumed they had to originating at the same point
which is why i said 2
yes, but it's still true with that 🤔
chipi chipi chapa chapa dubi dubi dapa dapa
i...ok well i guess that means you aren't interested
why is it not 2
hrm i will try to draw another bad but better picture

so if you have a blue vector along z axis (starting at origin), you can draw vectors in all sorts of directions (assume they are all in the xy plane) and they are all perpendicular and they all start at the same point as you required, they can all be unit vectors etc.
butthose arent perpendicular
check analytically: any vector in the xy plane has coordinates (x, y, 0) and the blue vector has coordinates (0, 0, z), what is the dot product of those?
a vector parallel to the z axis is perpendicular to any vector in the xy plane...
take a pen...stick it vertically on top of your desk...now walk your hand in any direction along your desk away from the pen...is it not perpendicular?
but that doesnt originate at the same point
nor are any of these lines perpendicular
ok well just think about it for a while or discuss it with someone else, i don't know how else to convince you 😄
it's just the direction that matters
the point is where the pen meets the desk, they DO originate at same point, i don't understand what you mean. in the drawing, the origin is the origin point of all the vectors
if i move a pen around a desk by definition of "move" it does not originate at the same place
no i didn't say move the pen sigh
imagine a line from the base of the pen along the desk without moving the pen, thats the perpendicular vector
are you sure you aren't trolling me at this point?
maybe i have the geometric definition of perpendicular wrong
so you agree a vector can be perpendicular to a plane right?
yeah
ok and say it meets that plane at some point O
O
you can draw many lines that coincide with the plane through O right?
(sorry bad typing) lol
what
like by rotating the flat angle
2 pens
one sticking up
one forming a 90 degree laying on the desk
yes you can spin it
yes, and each one of those configurations is perpendicular isn't it?
exactly
yeah i had my definition wrong
i was thinking complete opposites
instead of forming a 90
ok well sorry if i was rude by giving you the thumbs down, hope you didnt take it that way, but thanks for sticking around for following my argument 😄
preciate it ❤️
damn kanna got her channel taken over
They got their answer before we started
damn kanna how does it feel to be conquered
you should still be discussing in your own channel
also @shadow glade
yes, sorry, but I believe the question was answered already?
kanna wont be able to close this channel while you're still discussing here
yes, fair point, will open new channel next time 👍

!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @fallen thunder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi i just have a simple question about radicals
8rad8 - 9rad2
Im confused on how you simplify them to be able to subtract them
<@&286206848099549185>
am i not allowed to do that
oops
i just saw someone else do that
You're supposed to wait 15 minutes 
8rad8 = 8rad(4*2) = 8rad(2^2 2) = 8 2rad(2)
Assuming it’s square root
im confused on what this means i might just be stupid but like i looked itup and they simplified both of the inner parts of the radicals to be 2 so they could subtract
and i dont know how they did that
yeah
So sqrt(8) = sqrt(2^2 * 2)
sqrt(8) is nothing but sqrt(2*2*2)
so 8 * 2 * sqrt(2)
that is 16sqrt(2)
now you can go ahead and subtract
im still confused how they went from 8sqrt8 to 16sqrt2
sorry
so like
did they divided by 4
to get that inside part to be 2?
Or just ignore everything we both said that works too
exactly
ohhh okay seeing it visually like that helped more thanks
man im just confused trying to get some help and didnt understand what u said
thats all thank you
.close
Closed by @rain fiber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help knowing how to start
We first need to find tangent equation
It seems
So x + 1/2
You know in a equation dy/dx tells about slope of a tangent at that point
What is dy/dx
Ya we need a slope and a point to get tangent equation
Parabola
You know that for a line equation we need slope and a point y=mx+c
Yes
What dy/dx for parabola
So this is slope of tangent according to point x
For different points on parabola
Now you have to assume your point Q
How do I do this
Like assume it is (x1,y1)
Oh yes
So what is slope of tangent at x1,y1
Do I set equal to 0 and f(0) to get points?
No not that simple
Slope of tangent at x1,y1
No it's right i know
So it would be the same slope at Q
Ya
👍
Slope at Q is 3-x1
Yes
And it is passing through (0,1/2) also according to question
Correct
So what is equation of line
Yes edited
Now what is slope of a line passing through 2 points
Y-1/2=(3-x1)(x-0)
We need now x1
(6,0)?
No that's not satisfying parabola
Point Q is on parabola so it must satisfy it's equation
Mean point Q is lying on parabola right
See
So it satisfy parabolic equation
We assumed Q is x1,y1
I thought we said that was (0, 1/2) to get the equation of tangent
Yes so how do i find the x1
So Q is on parabola so it satisfy it's equation
So x1,y1 satisfy parabolic equation
So y1=3x1-(x1^2)/2
Get it
You understanding or we start again
I’m confused about this. Why is there 2 x1
You just put x1 ,y1 in parabolic equation
There is no 2 x1
You got a equation in x1,y1 right
Yes this one: y1=3x1-(x1^2)/2
Is it point Q?
Point Q on tangent line
y - 1/2 = 3 - x(x -0)
There is 3-x1
Now put x1,y1 point in this equation
Because x1,y1 point is on this tangent line
y1 - 1/2 = 3 - x1(x -0)?
x to x1 one more x
Both are x1?
Ya
Ok got it
Now we have two equation in x1,y1 can you solve them
Ok I’ll do it and text back
Ok
How did you get the last line of math you did?
I put y1 equal
Oh mb i didn’t see the =
Y1=1st equation
Y1=2nd equation
1st equation=2nd.equation
👍
Oh fr?
No not fr
So 4.5 or 5/2 😂
It is correct because we are working in first quadrant
Maybe there is a another tangent passing through (0,1/2) and cutting parabola
So we are doing 5/2?
Ya
There are two tangent one cuts at (1,5/2) and one cuts at (-1,-7/2)
Which is in 3rd quadrant
And Q is the 1, 5/2
And pass through (0,1/2)
Ya
Which part
Step 1 First we assume point Q
Step 2 Then we compute slope at Q and find the equation of tangent line
Step 3 we put Q in parabolic equation and tangent line equation
Step 4 we solve equations and find Q
Can you send question picture again
So tree is top of the hill
what
We have to find f'=0 point
3 in as the x yes?
5.5
2.5 foot tree
I just didn’t know how you knew how to start it
But isn’t the difference between 5.5 and 4.5 just 1?
Closed by @mystic bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
To count the radius, do I have to count the lines on the x and y plane with no indicated numbers like for example, if I only count the lines on the plane in Circle A then the radius will be 3 but if I don't it will be radius 6 which means I'm counting a decimal aswell
@pearl pollen Has your question been resolved?
radius is 6 squares which is 3 units
wdym 3 units?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with this
thank you
np
@ripe dune Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @ripe dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, I am supposed to solve this differential equation
$$
y''(t)-y(t)=e^{-1}\mathcal{H}(t)
$$, so using a fourier transform I got it into this form
$$
\hat{y}(\omega)=\frac{1}{(-\omega^2-1)(1+i\omega)}
$$ and from that i got this integral
$$
y(t)=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{e^{i\omega t}}{(-\omega^2-1)(1+i\omega)}d\omega
$$, is it correct?
konxmok
where $\mathcal{H}(t)$ is the Heaviside step function
konxmok
@twin solar Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>

@twin solar Has your question been resolved?
@twin solar Has your question been resolved?
@twin solar Has your question been resolved?
@twin solar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@smoky minnow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @smoky minnow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I find the area in Square meters of the composite figure
Like idk what to do
<@&286206848099549185>
Idk
Idk the steps
Like actually
Idk how to find area
A shape
Yeah
Yeah
Area of a circle is pi r^2
Ok
Uh
Which one is the radius again?
10
Ok
So
Pi10^2
I got 314
Uh
Ok
Um
What
Dude idk
What's the area of a rectangle
Ok
What do you get
No
Yes
Oh so it’s 80 x 40
Now what is the area of the small rectangle
600
Good job
Yessir
Now that you know the big rectangle equals 3200
And the small equals 600
How can you find the red part
subtract
Oh sorry
3200-600
2600
Ok
Area
Right?
20x20
400
400-20pi
D?
<@&286206848099549185>
@fading iris Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Natural log isn’t not part of the curriculum in my region.
The derivative of lnx is 1/x
Mickeydawg
I never thought Mickey could be another animal than a mouse
Should I just memorize it?
Or the proof for it is really simple and intuitive
Be surprised
Yes
You should've memorized a lot of the derivatives previously
Is this the definition of natural log?
I just found it on my desk
I wonder what it is used for
for magic
You mean the derivative?
I digress
Lets refocus on the original question
I’m about to make some claims
Correct me if I’m wrong
I need some break
I’m stressed
.close
Closed by @west hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
solving for x?
for 6, try multiplying by the denominators
btw, what do the colors mean
@raw thistle Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @raw thistle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
uh hi
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
The main problem i have is getting what their concept is
like usually the way i learn things is like breaking them down by what is it that this math is for
like what the trig functions represent?
what have you heard they represent
waves
but are you aware of right triangles
and what the ratios
of the sides mean
and how we relate them with these trig functions
like opposite sides adjacent sides and the hypotenuse
In this video, we show a single diagram consisting of various triangles that connects the six primary trig functions (sine, cosine, tangent, secant, cosecant, and cotangent) to lengths of line segments created from the unit circle (circle of radius 1). We use the diagram to explain features about why tangent and secant aren't defined at pi/2, th...
thank you that looks good already
the different trig functions just represent the ratios between the lengths of the sides of triangles given an angle
yo
yo
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anybody explain what the steps for this assignment are asking me?
like for part 1, what do they mean at 1 to start with a true statement?
state a fact
my fault for not asking the teacher when i had the chance, but if anyone could explain that would be great
the sum of the interior angles of a triangle is always 180?
lol probably want it related to trig
haha yeaah
hmm okay so i could just do like cos^2(x) + sin^2(x) = 1
thats a true pythagorean statement right
i kinda was guessing thats what that part might mean but then for 2 it's saying to apply identities to it
which i do not understand lol
yes
🙏
the applying identities part is using those 4 identities to change it up i think
kinda like the double angle identity where cos(2a) = sin^2 - cos^2 = sin^2- cos^2** + cos ^2 - cos^2** = 1 - 2cos^2
ohh yeah
suppose so
so i could take the id that says 1 + tan^2(x) = sec^2(x)
and isolate the 1 so its 1 = sec^2x - tan^2x
then put the one into the sin + cos one
so it would be like sin^2x + cos^2x = sec^2x - tan^2x
or am i misunderstanding it
simplify where? at the right hand side?
idk it says to have something complex
anyway i think i get it way more now :) thanks guys!
i will come back if i am confused again 👍
.close
Closed by @pulsar cosmos
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need some help with starting for part a)
If you draw a segment from O to A and O to B
They would both be radii of the circle
Therefore they would be equal in length
And they would form an isosceles triangle with the chord of the circle
They would be each 6cm in length right?
And I’m trying to find angle O with this information
Yes
So you can make a triangle with those 3 lengths involving angle O
You would also know all three of the side lengths
right
That would be sufficient to figure out the angle
Depending on what trig stuff you've learned in your class there are a couple ways to do it
I'm assuming/hoping you've at least done some right triangle trigonometry
Otherwise I'm unsure how to help from there
If you know law of cosines you can find the angle directly with that
If you've only covered right triangle trig relationships then you have to manipulate the figure a bit more
If you have not discussed trig functions at all I'm not sure how to proceed
Yeah I’m familiar with trig stuff I can probably do it
If you have not yet seen law of cosines
Cut the isosceles triangle in half with a segment that goes from O to the chord
This will cut the triangle into 2 congruent right triangles
Oh yea you did know it already cool
Well the way i can reason out without special formulas of some sort would be like this:
Once you know the central angle AOB, then you can determine the area of the sector "behind" the isosceles triangle
So you'd do 360 degrees - measure of angle AOB
To get the reverse central angle
Then you could also find the area of the isosceles triangle
The shaded area is:
Area of Entire Circle - Area of Isosceles triangle - Area of the big sector behind the triangle
Hm
Is there a way I can calculate the area of the sector
and then just get that and subtract the area of the circle
Wait
That wouldn’t do anything
Nvm
Well actually i over complicated it lol
You could find area of the small sector
And subtract the triangle
I did a roundabout way of finding it
You already know the central angle for the sector
The shaded area is just the sector with the triangle removed
So you'd do
(Angle/360 degrees ) * area of circle to find the sector area
Oh yeah sector of AOB and then subtract that with the area of triangle AOB
I’ll try it now
Well it's a good sign that everything ended up being rational (besides pi)
haha yeah
I will leave the calculations to you though lol
I think this is the simplest I can make it
Oh shit that didn’t even occur to me 36 is divisible by 3 lmao
Yea that looks neat so that is a great sign
okay, thank you for the help
Yw gl with your schoolwork
Closed by @split fulcrum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
let $V$ be vector spece over $\mathbb{F}, v \in V, W$ is subspace of $V$. Set $v+W$, whose all ements are sum of emelts from $v$ with some element from $W$, is called affine subspace in V. How can i proove that $v+W$ is subscpace of $V$ when $v\in W$ ?
Slowaq
What happens when you take a subspace, and add an element of that subspace to all other elements
itll still be subspace wont it ?
Yeah, which subspace will it be
@trail otter Has your question been resolved?
Well since we took element from sub space W and added it to sebspace W I think it’ll be W once again
Yep it will! Maybe try and prove this rigorously, i.e. if you fix v in W you can write any element w in W as v + u for some u in W
Hm I am having hard time with those rigorous proofs should I add anything to this statement you wrote?
Well you need to prove the statement I wrote
If you add an fixed element of W to everything in W, youre going to stay inside W since it's a subspace, that much is clear
The question is whether you can reach everything in W by doing this, as only then will v + W = W
Ugh unfortunately I don’t have a clue on how to prove this could you dhow me please
Youre looking to solve v + ? = w
since W is subspace of V then $\forall r,s \in \mathbb{F}, \forall v,w\in W$ holds that $rv+sw \in W$ thus we can get any $w$ from $W$ by doing linear combination of two elements from W for example $v+u=w$
Slowaq
is this somewhat close to needed proof? @final halo
You need to specifically tell me what u is
The game is: I give you an element of W, w, and you tell me what I have to add to v to get to w
is it some element from W which is eqaal to w-v?
That's exactly what u needs to be yes
And we know w-v is in W so v + (w-v) is in v + W
nice so just to recap when to some element v from W we add another element u from W we span the whole subspace W and since v+u=w thus u has to in in form of u=w-v. we never left W because any linear combination of elemnts from W yields another element from W thus we stayed in W and W is subscpace of V thus v+W is subspace of V when v is from W
is this correct? @final halo
@trail otter Has your question been resolved?
@trail otter Has your question been resolved?
@trail otter Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @trail otter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys, i struck on drive 10 from this process
anyone?
@void musk Has your question been resolved?
@void musk Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this work correct
is the formula in red correct?
@dapper shell Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Are you trying to integrate by parts?
yes
Then it is wrong.
For your f(x) and g(x),
You need to choose which one is more suitable to differentiate and which one is more suitable to integrate.
is the formula correct atleast
No, you shouldn't divide.
Its multiplication
And on the first term there shouldn't be a dx
Big F means primitive of f
i dont understand
Primitive = antiderivative
so integral?
First term is correct, second one is not
it should be u'(x) * integral of v dx
the vdx should not be inside those parentheses
almost! now you removed the big integral sign
yea
oh wow thank you
goodnight o/
gn!
@dapper shell Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's the square root if the opposite of I?
ヘイリー
@quick cloud Has your question been resolved?
Yes 👍
Well complex numbers have a really nice property where multiplying two of them multiplies their lengths and sums their angles
Oh, that's sick!
So since -i has length 1 and angle 3pi/2 (or 270 degrees), you should find the number that has length a and angle b such that a*a = 1 and b + b = 3pi/2
So is that that answer?
Well that's how to find the answer
There's a pretty specific answer in terms of a+bi (Different a and b than before)
Yep!
No prob
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Real quick
Ye?
Something else you might find useful is this identity
$e^{i\theta} = \cos(\theta) + i\sin(\theta)$
NotABot
Yeah it's a really cool and useful identity
Ty for showing me!
If you can find which value of theta gives -i, it's pretty easy to use that identity to find sqrt(-i)
No prob 🙂
.close
Closed by @quick cloud
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
cosec(x) = -sqrt(2) and x is in Q II, what is the value of cotan(x)
i tried doing it like this, by trying to find x first then just plugging that in cotan
1/sin(x) = -sqrt(2)
sin(x) = -sqrt(2) / 2
but doesn't this show that x can't be in the second quadrant?
for sin to give a negative value x must be in quadrant III or IV, no?
Can you screenshot the original question
it's in french
Do it
,rotate
"if cosec(x) = -sqrt(2) and x is in QII, what is the value of cotan(x)"
Closed by @tardy garden
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Literally don't understand what im doing wrong
can't i do this transformation?
the same here
why I can do it at the bottom, but not at the top?
that's probably -3 / -0
I don't understand
is the transformation here wrong?
no, that transformation is fine
but when you end up with -3 / 0, it's not clear whether that's positive or negative infinity
0/0 is indeterminate because it could be anything
-3 / 0 is infinite in one way or another
but like
$\lim_{x\to\y} \f{-3}{-e^{-x}}$ is clearly $\y$
ヘイリー
even though naïvely it would be -3 / 0
i mean you really don't have to do any of that
it's pretty clear that it's increasing since it's built out of increasing functions
oh yeah
what am i doing
so i cant just say x+sqrt(x^2+3) is infinite, since its [inf+inf], but I can do lim x->inf x + x*sqrt(1+3/x^2) = 2x = infinity
won't it be x + x*sqrt(1)?
oh sorry i got lost in the text. yes
Closed by @worthy frost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The answer is 0 and negative numbers, but how do I illustrate that in this notation?
Is it just x<1
znsn
@pallid fractal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
doing calc ab work with related rates and i dont understand the coffee pot problem at all 😭😭😭
.close
Closed by @lofty mesa
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
write $\sqrt{x}$ as $x^{\sfrac12}$
ヘイリー
instead of doing product rule between x^6 and x^1/2
try combining them
x^13/2
like you can use the product rule and that's valid, but it's more effort
(you can do a similar thing for that other term)
?
No it looks like that's wrong too
Aaaaaa okay I can do this
Maybe?
Nope
Apparently this is the answer
Any idea how that happened?
@indigo parcel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @indigo parcel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help with some U-sub
KAVA
Im not sure how to u-sub this
Sometimes it's easier to start with the derivative you should get, and then work backwards
1/2x?
the denominator has 1+x^2, think about the derivative of that
In this case, you have two choices:
du = x dx
Or
du = 1/(1 + x²) dx
One of those is much easier to work with, and ends up working out well
Let's say du = x dx
What would u = ?
Its been a while Im not certain 😅
Still shaking off the rust
u would just be constant yes?
Let's say, for fun:
u = x²
Then what would du be?
Close. du = 2x dx
Note the very important implication that dx is "multiplying" the 2x here
What does that do to the function?
We can even rearrange that:
du/2 = x dx
I see yes
Btw, there's an x dx in the integral. We can now replace x dx with du/2
As they are the same
Oh true
2π ∫ 1/(1 + x²) du/2
Now, we don't want a mixed integral. Having an x and u at the same time is terrible
Agreed
Remember, we have these two equations:
u = x²
du = 2x dx
It would be nice if we could convert all x to u
Yes
I'll let you decide what should be replaced here
It's just a multiplicative constant. If you like, you can move the 1/2 outside the integral
Oh dang
Im gonna try to work it from here
Then return
if I have issue
But close for now
Thank you for your help
.close
Closed by @vocal kiln
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help
.close
Closed by @hard crest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm gearing up to start Calc 2, and I need to make sure I'm well-prepared. Any advice on what specific topics and concepts from Calc 1 I should review to set myself up for success in Calc 2? Any recommended resources?
functions, limits, derivatives, integration? what else?
yeah probably just be comfortable in computing derivatives (easy) and integrals (takes more practice), be familiar with the big theorems like the mean value theorem (used in many proofs) and fundamental theorem of calculus, the major trig identities, review delta epsilon concepts to make sure it has clicked
be clear also on the definition of integrals as riemann sums since definitions of more complex integrals in terms of riemann sums will also happen
thank you
@modest cloak Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've used L'hopitals to arrive at this ugly looking equation. How do I got about solving it? n > 0, and a,b are integers >= 2
in num and denominator
bruh no
huh
;-;
see this
yk what idk how to solve limits anyway never really done em
imma leave u to help this dude
peace
Wait
Divide my ln(2 on num and denominator)
ln(2) will dissaperar in denominator
split the fraction in this fashion (a+b)/c = a/c + b/c
Since it's an infinite limit, you only need to focus on end behavior. You should know that as x -> infinity, 1/xln(a) = 0, so we don't care about that part. Everything else can be done analytically using end behavior, once again
answers 2^b
damn
I was thinking about ignoring that term, but wasn't sure if I was able to
Well i mean
Its the best way imo
Because if you simplify it it's legit just $\lim_{x\to \infty}\frac{\ln(2) + 2^x2^b}{\ln(2) + 2^x}$
Umbraleviathan
You know ln(2) = O(2^x) so you only focus on the 2^x term, effectively just erasing ln(2) from the top and bottom
Its been a while since I've taken a calculus course, and its popping back up again in my algorithm analysis class, so I've been trying to remember how to go about these
If you have a function F(x) = f(x)/g(x), and you evaluate an infinite limit for F(x), you only really need to analyze to whatever dominates f(x) and g(x) for whatever infinity
How is that done?
Let's consider something simple for now like
(x^4 + 6x + 7)/(6x^2 + ln(x)), and we evaluate for x -> inf
Thanks to everyone else who helped, btw
We can say that f(x) = x^4 + 6x + 7 and g(x) = 6x^2 + ln(x)
We gotta look at the highest power term for each
Which is x^4 and 6x^2 respectively
So this is equivalent to evaluating the limit as x -> inf for x^4 / 6x^2
Likewise for your problem, we identified what term is dominant as x -> infinity
So if the limit was a constant, like 2^b, using this approach would still allow us to find the answer = 2^b?
well
Meaning for this problem, instead of L'Hopital, I can just ignore loga(n), and simplify (2^n * 2^b)/(2^n) = 2^b?
Establishing end behavior, the leading term for the numerator is 2^x 2^b and the denominator is 2^x
Should be n -> inf, sorry
You can ignore log(n)
My brain is a bit fried right now, but why is it we can ignore a term that would go to infinity (log(n)) in order to find 2^b?
That's because log(n) = O(2^n). In other words, to extreme values, 0 < log(n) < C 2^n where C is some constant
So log(x) kinda becomes nothing
So we can also apply log < exponential in a limit, and ignore the log
Like a pebble to a whole mountain
Pretty much
It's a bit discrete analysis but i mean
Well that makes this question a lot easier
It does kinda rely on you knowing what certain parent functions look like
I was able to prove loga(n) + 2^(n+b) was big-theta(2^n) using the c1g(n) <= t(n) <= c2g(n), but had to do it again, only using limits
So wasn't sure exactly what I was and wasn't allowed to do when proving with limits
I had to show using both approaches, so they MAY want me to actually use L'hopitals and do the calculations to get lim = 2^b
Thanks, and thank you @obsidian stream and @lean otter
Splitting the fraction ends up working for the first one
You don't need to do L'H
Limits are a linear operator
I tend to make things more complicated than they have to be.
@steel crypt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @steel crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For question #6 I got the part where the boats move north and west but how would I go about finding the bearings?
@vagrant oriole Has your question been resolved?
Hello, the bearing is the angle that is swept when you imagine a vertical upwards (north) line from the first point, and rotate it clockwise until it hits the second point
So for example bearing from North to East is 90degrees, South to North is 0degrees, North to West is 270 degrees
Would I just write 270 degrees for the bearing of Boat A (21 mi) to Boat B (18 mi)?
Sorry on reflection, those examples are wrong, but the first point is what i meant
It would be the angle 180 degrees + the top angle of the triangle
Because you imagine a north line at the top point, sweep it until it hits the second, so it is the 180 sweep to the right side of the triangle, and then the top angle more to sweep all the way to B clockwise
Does that make sense?
I am understanding what ur saying but for the top of the triangles angle would I have to find the hypotenuse first and then use Cos?
Just use tan, you have the opposite and adjacent
But yes, that would work as well but longer
Here's a drawing of the bearings so the concept is clearer
For B how come the direction used is North and not West?
The bearing is always the angle swept from north
Ooh ok
I found A to B (220.6 degrees) but for B to A im having trouble finding the bearing
Would I also have to find the angle on the inside first in order to find the outside on?
There is a relation between angles here because of parallel lines
(alternate angles)
Oh so it would be 40.6 if I am understanding you correctly.
As that is the angle I found on the top with tan
Yep 😄
No problem, best of luck!
.close
Closed by @vagrant oriole
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
given the graph of f(x) de function goes trough point (1,18) and has a minimum/maximum at (-1,2). give the function of f(x)
