#help-23
1 messages · Page 174 of 1
You should read up on this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integration_by_substitution
(or find some tutorial online for integration by substitution)
I just don’t understand how that applies here
For example
Where does x^2 go?
It turns into du lol
Yes, because of this
Or, if it's easier to understand, dx = du / (6x^2)
Note the 1/6 that goes in front of the integral
du divided by 6x^2?
I’m honestly trying my best but this makes no sense
I have
$\int \frac{sinx}{u^2 +1}$ where u = cosx
Merineth
Right?
No, you're missing dx
No
Cosx dx?
You need to go back to the definition of an integral, you're missing basic knowledge here
Clearly, this is not something we have been taught
<- Nell
Yes sir
(and that area is signed of course)
The definite integral, or antiderivative, is that area between 0 and x
Yes
So here, if you look at the green rectangles, they form an approximation of the area under the curve between 0 and 1
Yea
What's the area of each individual rectangle?
Well they are also integrals, if you aren’t referring to base * height
Right, and what's height?
y
Take just one rectangle, note the x coordinate of its left side t
What's the length of that left side?
x2 - x1

Ok I guess you chose x1 and x2 instead
But that would be its bottom side, wouldn't it?
Yes
So the base
Yea
Now what's the height?
That would be the f(x1) = sqrt(x1)
My bad. Yes x1
Ok, do you agree that the sum of the area of all those rectangles forms an approximation of the area under sqrt(x)?
Do you also agree that it becomes a better approximation when the base of each rectangle becomes smaller
(which also means more rectangles)
Yes I do
Well, the integral is the limit of this sum
For the height, we have sqrt(x_n)
For the base, we have some small number d_n
As we pick d_n to be smaller and smaller, the approximation becomes better
But we also need the number of rectangles
x is the right edge of the area we want to calculate
So the number of rectangles is n = x/d_n
Does that make sense?
Let us process, one sec
Here's a graph to play around with
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/5gkwx2oyuj
It only shows the top side of the rectangles
d_n, not x
Okay we think we get it
The smaller the d_n the more rectangles
The better the approximation
Yes
So let's write down the sum now
We have the number of rectangles x/d_n
The base of each rectangle d_n
And the height, f(i*d_n) with i an integer between 0 and x/d_n
We are lost
x_1 for the i'th rectangle is i*d_n
d_n is the length from x1 to x2?
Yes
and x is y?
No?
x is y?
Actually I think it’s best if we just watch some Yt videos on it
We are hopeless
Because we have too many rectangles
It's not the same x1 and x2 for every rectangle...
x2-x1 however is the same, that's d_n
Ok 
So do you understand all of these points?
- left side of the full area at 0
- right side of the full area at x
- base of rectangle i: d_n
- height of rectangle i: f(i*d_n)
- number of rectangles: n = x/d_n
Yes that makes sense
So the sum is: $\sum_{i=0}^{\frac{x}{d_n}} f(i \cdot d_n) \cdot d_n$
Nel
Right?
I just put each of my points in the sum
We have never dealt with the sum sign ever in our life lmao
Damn what is your school teaching
I don’t know to be honest but it’s clear that it’s dog water bad
No wonder we are struggling like hell
Ok let's not deal with the sum sign I guess
My so says you must live in Japan since you are so Knowledgeable haha
$f(0 \cdot d_n) d_n + f(1 \cdot d_n) d_n + f(2 \cdot d_n) d_n + ... + f(\frac{x}{d_n} \cdot d_n) d_n$
Nel
Just summing the area of each rectangle one by one
Well that's the exact same thing
The issue with this notation is that the number of terms is unclear
And as we take the limit as d_n goes to 0, the number of terms increases to infinity
That's more or less the definition of the integral
It's the limit of that sum as d_n goes to 0
Here's the graph from earlier, with the antiderivative of sqrt(x) in black and this sum in green:
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/xmq7s0mccm
You can play around with d_n
Actually it's not quite right, it shouldn't be that precise, but I'm not sure what I did wrong 
Anyway it's just for intuition
I’m just wondering how knowing about that applies to substituting
I'm coming to that
Okay!
As d_n becomes closer and closer to 0, it becomes infinitesimal and we write it dx
The number of rectangles becomes infinite, but because dx is infinitesimal, the sum still makes sense
It's like summing a very large number of very small things
Makes sense
The rest is f(i*d_n) which is just the function at each point
So the integral is written $\int f(x) ,dx$, where $\int$ roughly means "infinite sum" and $,dx$ roughly means "infinitely small steps"
Nel
Okay
So the dx is important, you can't just throw it away, otherwise the infinite sum will just yield infinity
Makes sense
Now where you make a substitution, you change the variable from x to u, so you also need to change the step from dx to du
For example if u = 2x then u grows twice as fast as x so the steps du are twice as large as the steps dx
So du = 2dx
Take the example from Wikipedia:
$\int (2x^3+1)^7 (x^2) ,dx$
Nel
If you set u to what's on the left in the parentheses: u = 2x^3 + 1, then you want to know the step size du so you can just integrate a function of u instead of a function of x
Does that make sense?
So now we have dx and du?
Well, if you set u = 2x^3+1, then you get
$\int (u^7) (x^2) ,dx$
The goal is to get replace all instances of x with u
what's du/dx (2x^3 + 1)?
Nel
So the goal is to replace all x with u?
Yes but it needs to match what you set, u = 2x^3+1
Okay
Now, u is like a function
u(x) = 2x^3+1
You can find du/dx by differentiating this, because that's pretty much the definition
du is the vertical step size of u(x), and dx is the horizontal step size
du/dx is just the slope of u(x)
Like in this thing:
"change in x", at the limit, is dx
"change in y", at the limit, is dy (or du in our case)

So what happens after this step
First you find du
The derivative of u(x) = 2x^3+1 is u'(x) = 6x^2
du/dx = u'(x) = 6x^2
So du = 6x^2 dx or dx = du/(6x^2)
da/db is the derivative of a with respect to b
You replace dx with du according to what you found
So x^2 dx = du/6
So we get (u^7)(x^2) * u’
Okay so that is how you get -1/sinx
$\int (2x^3+1)^7 (x^2) ,dx = \int u^7 \frac{du}{6}$ where $u=2x^3+1$ and $du = 6x^2 dx$
Nel
Yes
No it's an infinitesimal change in x
A derivative is of a function, not a variable
Where?
Never mind
We are having trouble with reading
Or rather
Understanding by reading
So is there anything still unclear to you?
Just to be clear
Whenever I substitute with u on something
I have to multiply it with the derivative
Of u
$\int f(x) ,dx = \int u(x) \frac{du}{u'(x)}$
Nel
The point is to choose u correctly
I’m sorry but we really don’t get it
.
I don’t learn by reading 😭
I read it over and over and over
It doesn’t stick
The way everything is formulated and explained in text for math is not how normal people speak and understand
So I don’t understand how people are expected to understand it
I don't think it talks about integration by substitution but it might help with the fundamentals
I gusss I’ll hvave to watch a video of it
And see if it makes more sense
Because reading just doesn’t work
@safe parrot Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @safe parrot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So I've been taught at a level how to solve second order differential equations in the form $a\frac{d^2y}{dx^2} + b\frac{dy}{dx} + c = 0$. but now my professor wants us to solve them with higher orders and mainly with x(t) multiplied. I'm currently doing a question where I have to solve $\frac{d^2}{dt^2}x(t) + 2\frac{d}{dt}x(t) + x(t) = 0$ and it would be fine if it wasn't for everything being multiplied by x(t). How do I go about solving this? My professor does a shit job at explaining it
Solaris (firecatto)
what
wdym it's multiplied by x(t)
d/dt x(t) means the derivative of x(t) with respect to t
it's just an alternate notation
@bitter matrix
what would d/dt mean on it's own anyway
on the first, you have that y is a function of x.
on the second, you got that x is a function of t.
In both cases, you got two derivatives of a function with respect to its variable
when solving the general solution and it's complex I was taught that it'd be in the form $e^p^x(Acos(qx) + B(sin(qx))$ where the roots where $p+-qi$, but now he is asking for this form...?
Solaris (firecatto)
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
complex exponentials
the cos and sin you have when you're interested in real solutions come from complex exponentials
so how would I do it in that form?
how does it translate?
I was thinking about euler's formula but sin doesn't have an i infront of it
so you have exp(0t) (a constant), exp(2it), exp(-2it)
well the idea is, if you have a complex solution U(t) + iV(t) to a linear diffeq (U and V are real functions), then U(t) and V(t) themselves are also solutions
it's not hard to show
so that's how you translate from complex solutions to real solutions
ok, i see, thanks
so in the first example, with the equation $\frac{d^2}{dt^2}x(t) + 2\frac{d}{dt}x(t) + x(t) = 0$, i've gotten the general soltuion $x(t)=(A+Bt)e^-^t$. Now i'm given the boundary conditions $x(0)=A$ and $\frac{dx}{dt}(0)=0$. The first seems to be completely useless cause when I enter t=0 into my general solution it just gives $x(0)=A$ which is what the boundary condition said. However when I differentiate my general solution and then compute t=0 I end up with $A=B$, which still doesn't let me state what A and B are
What am I doing wrong?
Solaris (firecatto)
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
@bitter matrix Has your question been resolved?
@bitter matrix Has your question been resolved?
@bitter matrix Has your question been resolved?
@bitter matrix Has your question been resolved?
@bitter matrix Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how many decimal zeroes does this have?
Isnt the answer zero
as 99999 over 99999 to the same power is bassically 1
its like 1/1=1
It would be like
1/(1-1)
1/0
which is undefined
Dont believe me im like not a maths expert
wolfram alpha says differently
and this isnt even the entirety of it
i think our math professor trolled us
by telling us to find the number of decimal zeroes
or im just stupid
@frozen current Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @frozen current
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I forgot what X\Y means
context?
Sets
elements in X but not in Y
Ah wait it’s ummm like without X without Y I can’t remember the name now
set minus
Closed by @rich tree
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
its like x/(x-1) you can't just assume x is 1 so i don't think you can assume that its undefined
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Tbh not really sure where to start
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
I've just shuffled things around
click on the 1st image to see it in full
@grizzled topaz Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Remember that $\sin{(\pi - \theta)} = \sin{\theta} $ so the left side becomes (I'm talking about the first exercise) $2\sin{\frac{\pi}{5}}\cos{\frac{\pi}{5}}$
And then you're done, because the last term I wrote is equal to the right side, just remember $\sin{(2\theta)} = 2\sin{\theta}\cos{\theta}$
For the second one you have to use similar reasoning
@grizzled topaz Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how could i apply chain rule here
$e^{5tanx} + 5^{2x}$
odokawa
chain rule for the left hand and chain rule for the right hand or both in the same operation
Step 1: Find the derivative of $e^{5 \tan x}$
Dubs
Fix the typos
what's a typo
Fix the typographical error
$5\sec^2x e^{5 \tan x}$
Dubs
You shouldn’t leave the x of secx
oaky oaky
odokawa
Dubs
odokawa
because i drop the 2 and 2 * 5 is 10
and the derivative of 2x is 2
Nope it doesn’t work like that
If you have x^2, then you can apply power rule
Notice the base is a costant like 5
it’s not a variable
let me find the power rule rq
$x^2$ and $2^x$ are different
potencia means power
Dubs
but here there are 2 of them
For x^2, you can apply the power rule given above
but for 2^x, you cannot bring that x down and take away 1 from the exponent
Jeez
i think it´s something like that but i dont know how to do that actually
My purpose is defeated
well
sorry big man even i had doubt in this one thats why i asked
i think this is too hard for me
Let’s take $y= 5^{2x}$
how can i search in youtube
Dubs
something that explain me this
why? there is a rule or something¿
We are going to figure out a rule to differentiate the above
Clearly you cannot apply the power rule
Power rule only holds if you have something of the form x^n
As you can see here
But y=$5^{2x}$ is not in that form right?
Dubs
Apply natural log both sides?
odokawa
Yes
yes but why, i would like to know if there is a rule or something i can based on
Let’s see how to differentiate such a case
Our goal is to use the idea that derivative of lnx is 1/x
to tackle this problem
That’s the monologue i can give
Can you apply natural log both sides and tell what you get?
okay oaky
$\ln y= \ln(5^{2x})$
Dubs
There you go the first step
$ln(e^{5tanx}) + ln (5^{2x})$
Let’s take $y= 5^{2x}$
okay oka y
You have already found the derivative of the first term
lets work with right hand
Now you have to only find the derivative of 5^2x
odokawa
here we go
Let me wrap everything real quick
So we are on track
We have to find the derivative of $e^{5 \tan x} + 5^{2x}$
Dubs
yes
Step 1: Find the derivative of $e^{5 \tan x}$ Done. \
Step 2: Find derivative of $5^{2x}$ \
Step 3: set $y= 5^{2x}$, differentiate \
Step 4: Add both of them to get final answer
Dubs
Is there a confusion?
one question
in the step 2 can I apply this?
because i think ln is too advanced for me
Notice here the base is e, but yours it’s 5
It’s not going to the too advance? let’s see how it goes
$\ln y= \ln(5^{2x})$
Dubs
Try?
sure
i practiced like 30 minutes ago
great
$\frac{1}{5^{2x}} dx(5^{2x})$
odokawa
Not an issue
oh
Take your time
but
i thought
log(x) was 1/x * x'
that's why i write that
.close
Closed by @tacit pendant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi i need HELP
do you know about the limit [
\lim_{x \to 0} \f{\m\sin x}x = 1
]
lim sinx /x as x tends to 0 is 1
Also note that the term within sin and the denominator need to be the same
so what do i put on the calculator
to get 1
so how do i do it
i have my exam in 2 days and im stressing out
yes i didnt really get it
you can do it, i also have examen tomorrow about derivatives, and ive been in this discord server for the last 15 hours without rest, sometimes is about stress, you can man ❤️
since the term within sin and denominator need to be the same, how about you multiply ax to both numerator and denominator?
appreciate it bro, gl on ur exam 🔥
so we can just cancel them out?
we can cancel sin x and x
Well it becomes 1
There's a proof for that
It's seperate
Unless you're supposed to show the working of that proof for the question above
nope im nto supposed to show the working
Oh ok
Using the squeeze theorem to prove that the limit as x approaches 0 of (sin x)/x =1
Watch the next lesson: https://www.khanacademy.org/math/differential-calculus/limits_topic/epsilon_delta/v/limit-intuition-review?utm_source=YT&utm_medium=Desc&utm_campaign=DifferentialCalculus
Missed the previous lesson?
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/diffe...
You can refer to this if you want to know why
i just need to know how to solve it....
so how can i solve it.....
that'll confuse me more
...
can u show me how
That is supposed to be the way but alr
But x is tending to 0
And the term within sin should be the same as denominator
sin(x)/x
So sin(ax)/ax
@solar cosmos Has your question been resolved?
I wish I can say yes 😭
<@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @solar cosmos
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello i need help with a calculus problem: i want to calculate the area inside the loop of the curve from the picture but don't know how to.
Find the intersections, find the relation between the two (which one has a bigger value), then use integral..
My intersections don't match the model answer i have 0 and 0.908... and this is the model answer:
@rose steeple Has your question been resolved?
It should be an easy excercise in the book so prob a apllication of formule would suffice, thanks anyway I'll look into it more
Alright.
@rose steeple Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this correct
$Z:=:2\sqrt{3}+2i::=>:\left|z\right|=\sqrt{\left(2\sqrt{3}\right)^2+\left(2i\right)^2}:=>:\left|z\right|=\sqrt{12-4}:=>:\left|z\right|=\sqrt{8}$
Crawling Ham
oh
,, z = \mr{a} + i\mb{b} \implies \abs{z} = \sqrt{\mr{a}^2 + \mb{b}^2}
Pure
i just want to latex
Closed by @azure wigeon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im confused for this circled area
yea im pretty sure the 16 and 9 are right but idk what the 5 is supposed ot be
I don't understand on how to do this
Alr thx
ok
mb restroom
(4x+3)^2+5 right, all sqrt'd
the thing is (a+b)^2 is not a^2+b^2 like you wrote there
well, kind of
(a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2
not quite no, your x disappeared to some far away land
oops it always does
and that middle term wouldnt be a +
2ab not 2(a+b)
not quite
the first term would be (4x)^2 not 4x^2 and the last would be 3^2 not 4^2
middle term is okay though
Ok
no, the left hand side of that equation, why is there a 16x+9 over there
(4x+3)^2=16x^2+24x+9 though yes
thought we needed it its just a trinomial ok
makes it easier
oh
😭
thought i was done
forgot the +5
oh 16x^2+24x+14
indeed
Closed by @wide cloud
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @weary osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do you know which one it is as they both give you the same answer?
'first positive angle'
it says first positive value so u have to take the one before 5pi/3
sin(a) = sin(pi-a) and sin(a) = -sin(-a)
How do you know which is closer to the positive?
sin is negative in 3rd and 4th quadrants
So the angle in 3rd quadrant would be smaller than the one in the next quad
Oh so you just look at where the function is negative in the quadrants and choose the smallest one?
That's one way to do it, yes
Closed by @edgy thistle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Use the "Schrankensatz" (idk what its called in english) to show that
$$
|A^2-B^2| \leq 2 |A - B |,
$$
for all $A,B \in \mathbb{R}^{n,n}$ with $|A|,|B| < 1$, where $|\cdot |$ is the operator norm on $\mathbb{R}^{n,n}$.\
\
NOTE: First show that $(Dq(A))(B)=AB + BA$ for $A,B \in \mathbb{R}^{n,n}$ and
$$
q : \mathbb{R}^{n,n} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n,n}, \ A \mapsto A \cdot A.
$$
Levens
any help?
@short sparrow Has your question been resolved?
Let $\mathcal{V},\mathcal{W}$ be finite-dimensional Banach spaces, $U \subseteq \mathcal{V}$ open, and $f:U \rightarrow \mathcal{W}$ differentiable. Also, let $a,b \in U$, so that the "connecting distance" $\overline{ab}$ between $a$ and $b$ in $U$ is within $U$. Then holds
$$
|f(b) - f(a)| \leq \sup_{x \in \overline{ab}} |Df(x)| \cdot |b-a|,
$$
where $\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{V},\mathcal{W})$ is provided with the operator norm regarding the norms in $\mathcal{V}$ and $\mathcal{W}$.\
\
\
idk what the "connecting distance" is in english again, so here's the definition of that:\
\
Let $\mathcal{V}$ be a vector space and let $a,b \in \mathcal{V}$. Then $\overline{ab} := {a +t(b-a) \ | \ t \in [0,1]}$ is called the "connecting distance".
Levens
I did this
[q(A + tB) = (A + tB) \cdot (A + tB) = A \cdot A + 2tA \cdot B + t^2B \cdot B.]
[\lim_{{t \to 0}} \frac{1}{t}(q(A + tB) - q(A)) = \lim_{{t \to 0}} \frac{1}{t}(A \cdot A + 2tA \cdot B + t^2B \cdot B - A \cdot A).]
[\lim_{{t \to 0}} \frac{1}{t}(2tA \cdot B + t^2B \cdot B) = 2A \cdot B + B \cdot B.]
and then
[||A^2 - B^2|| = ||q(A) - q(B)||.]
[||q(A) - q(B)|| \leq ||Dq(A)|| \cdot ||A - B||.]
Since (||A||, ||B|| < 1), (||AB + BA|| \leq 2||A|| \cdot ||B|| < 2.)
Levens
1st line, you don't know that AB = BA
so tAB + tBA doesn't have to equal 2tAB
also the t^2/t B^2 vanishes when taking the limit
so that indeed the derivative of q at A in the direction of B is AB+BA
oh okay so what could i do
nah it's just a correction of the first part
you used AB+BA afterwards anyway
however
how does that follow from your Schrankensatz ?
how do you know ||Dq(A)|| is the sup of the ||Dq(x)|| for x in the segment/'connecting distance' AB ?
idk tbh i jsut wanted to write something down
well let's look at the sup then
,tex \begin{align*} \sup_{M\in \overline{AB}} \|Dq(M)\| &= \sup_{t\in [0,1]} \|Dq((1-t)A + tB)\| \\ &= \sup_{t\in [0,1]} \|(1-t)Dq(A) + tDq(B)\|\end{align*}
aPlatypus
we can notice that Dq itself is linear here, so we can split that thing up
from triangular inequality we get that ||(1-t)Dq(A) + tDq(B)|| <= (1-t) ||Dq(A)|| + t ||Dq(B)||
and you can show that the operator norm of Dq(M) is 2 ||M|| for all M (that's what you tried to show in your second part)
,tex \begin{align*} \sup_{M\in \overline{AB}} \|Dq(M)\| &= \sup_{t\in [0,1]} \|Dq((1-t)A + tB)\| \\ &= \sup_{t\in [0,1]} \|(1-t)Dq(A) + tDq(B)\| \\ &\leq \sup_{t\in [0,1]} (1-t)\|Dq(A)\| + t\|Dq(B)\| \\ &=\sup_{t\in [0,1]} 2(1-t)\|A\| + 2t\|B\|\end{align*}
aPlatypus
using $|A| \leq 1$ and $|B| \leq 1$, we indeed get that $\sup_{M\in \overline{AB}} |Dq(M)| \leq 2$
aPlatypus
Closed by @short sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi I need help proofing that the gamma function is smooth I have already proven that the gamma function is differentiable 1 time if that helps
yes that helps a lot because smooth and differentiable are equivalent for complex functions
I have proven that I can switch the integral and the derivative for the first derivative
for me its only defined for all Real values greater than 0
$\Gamma'(x) = \frac{d}{dx} \int_0^\infty t^{x-1} e^{-t} , dt$
tobi
$\Gamma'(x) = \int_0^\infty t^{x-1} e^{-t} \log(t) , dt$
tobi
I have proven that I can switch differentiation and integral for the first derivative
@raw pivot Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @raw pivot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help me
Pure
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for this one tell me if im on the right track
so just writing out the top part i got
((x+h)^2 - 9(x+h)+12) - (x^2+9x+12)
yh
so for the 2nd part - F(x)
i just swap the symbols?
or do i only swap the minus to positives
because rn i got (X^2 + h^2 - 9x - 9h + 12) - (x^2 + 9x + 12)
like would these 2 12's cancel out?
or is the +12 in the 2nd part supposed to be -12
get rid of x^2 and 12
should the last 12 be -12?
ik but yk because how its - (x^2 -9x +12) and i swapped the -9x to +9x
would i do the same with the +12 and that would be -12
and then they cancel out
u can ye
alr
wait what
i got sum way dif
(X^2 + h^2 - 9x - 9h + 12) + (x^2 + 9x - 12)
did i do sum wrong?
.close
Closed by @old yacht
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if the gradient is -y-x/3y+x
and i need to find out the points P,Q at a vertical tangent, so im guessing when the gradient is underfined how do i do that?
i thought about making the gradient equal to zero but i literally dont know what to do
.close
Closed by @real sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@wind siren Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This statement is confusing me, what is U? what does it mean when it says U does not equal R^n? I need to show if this statement is true or false, but I cant figure out what it means
U is some subspace and it's..not N-dimensional euclidean space over the real numbers
U is a subspace of Rⁿ
Note we're excluding the case where U is the entire space, which is normally a subspace.
ah I see, so U is not specifically defined, it is only a general subspace of R^n as long as it is not all of R^n
Yeah exactly
Closed by @coral sail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
having trouble understand this, why would k/2 +2 = 0 lead to 2 basic eigenvectors?
there are no leading 1's in any of the rows, doesn't that mean that there are 4 parameters and therefore 4 basic eigenvectors?
@wise schooner Has your question been resolved?
@wise schooner Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help solving a system of 4 equations
a1 + a3 = x10
b1+b3 = x20
sqrt(3)a2 +a4=x30
sqrt(3)b2+b4=x40
they answers should be in terms of x
for example b1 = 5x10 - 5/2x20
that is what I got but it does not work with the back of the book
none of this notation makes sense
what is "5x10"
and you have at least 8 variables in your 4 equations
sorry for the confusion
this is a differential equations
and so I had intial conditions where x1(0) = x10
it's just the notation the book choose
could you take a picture of said question
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
thanks
so the difference between mine and this example problem
is that my x1 has a sqrt(3) everywhere where there is a 3
because of how the eigenvalues worked out
my problem follows the example up until the eigenvalues
this is the problem statement
number 3
looks like you switch it all to b's then use your preferred method of simultaneous linear equation solving
gotcha
so rn I know that a1 = 7/10b1, a2=7/10b2, a3=1/2b3, a4=1/2b4
and so I just sub in for ai's?
rn I have....
7/10b1 +1/2b3=x10
b1 + b3 = x20
sqrt(3) 7/10b2 + 1/2b4 = x30
sqrt(3) b2 + b4 = x40
but when I plug this into wolfram alpha I get a different answer from the book :\
This is the answer in the book
this is what I get 😦
x2 is represented in terms b1 cost + b2sint and so on
@devout harbor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Mr. Earl E. Bird leaves his house for work at exactly 8:00 A.M. every morning. When he averages 40 miles per hour, he arrives at his workplace three minutes late. When he averages 60 miles per hour, he arrives three minutes early. At what average speed, in miles per hour, should Mr. Bird drive to arrive at his workplace precisely on time?
i did average speed = total distance / total time
s = 2d/d/40 + d/60
is this correct
o then i got d=48
so i substitute it back into my original equation
to solve for s
and i got s=48
.close
Closed by @subtle robin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this step by step? I watched a video on the shell method but still don't know how to start.
Do a relevant example
https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/classes/calci/volumewithcylinder.aspx
is the 4th example the closest to my problem/
Try it
...but you can find them! "...region bounded by $y =\sqrt{x} + 1$ and $y = x^2 + 1$"
@junior smelt
yes i will make them equal to each other and solve
Yep 
would i just have sqrt(x) - x^2 = 0?
That would be what you're trying to solve yea 
@fallen ether Has your question been resolved?
i got my x values and i plugged in 0.5 into both original equations but now i dont know how to move forward
probably would have to leave someone else to explain the shell method, I'm not too great at explaining it 
<@&286206848099549185>
@fallen ether Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @fallen ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Symbolab shows the top 2 as thet answer, and I did it on pather and got pi/4 myself
Idk how they got 5pi/12
but even then
The website isn't accepting the solutions
Notice that cos(5pi/4) = -sqrt(2)/2 as well.
Okay but
We're
cos(3x) = sqrt(2)/2
I have that 3 in there still
so I have to acos
to isolate x
acos can't go past pi/2
Yes
So then I have to ignore the 3 while finding initial solutions then?
$2cos3x=-\sqrt{2}\Leftrightarrow cos3x=-\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\Leftrightarrow \\3x=\frac{3\pi}{4}+2k\pi\text{ }\text{ }\vee \text{ }\text{ }3x=\frac{5\pi}{4}+2k\pi\Leftrightarrow \\x=\frac{\pi}4{}+\frac{2}{3}k\pi\text{ }\text{} \vee \text{ }\text{ }x=\frac{5}{12}\pi+\frac{2}{3}k\pi$
The other solution is 2pi - arccos(...)
Joanna Angel
and now you need to sleect k
yes i give you more
all general solutions
and now
you must sleect k
to mke solutions go to yoru interval
What
do you understand me ?
No
i gave you all solutions
of yoru euqation
in a geenral way
and now you have to establish values of k
No
k = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, etc
Anything past 0 will break out of [0,2pi)
you need to choose the value of k so that the root falls within your range
What
$2cos3x=-\sqrt{2}\Leftrightarrow cos3x=-\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}\Leftrightarrow \\3x=\frac{3\pi}{4}+2k\pi\text{ }\text{ }\vee \text{ }\text{ }3x=\frac{5\pi}{4}+2k\pi\Leftrightarrow \\x=\frac{\pi}4{}+\frac{2}{3}k\pi\text{ }\text{} \vee \text{ }\text{ }x=\frac{5}{12}\pi+\frac{2}{3}k\pi$
The point is, there are more solutions that you would usually get in [0, 2pi) because you have 3x, not x. You can think of it as your cos wave being squished on the y axis by a factor of 3, so if you had 2 solutions, you should end up with 6 in a way because it does the whole thing 3 times in the same range.
Joanna Angel
yes
OHHHH
$x\in \left{\frac{\pi}{4},\frac{11\pi}{12},\frac{19\pi}{12},\frac{5\pi}{12},\frac{13\pi}{12},\frac{7\pi}{4} \right}$
Joanna Angel
So in general, if you must solve cos(3x) = y, you would do :
3x = arccos(y) + 2pin
3x = 2pi - (arccos(y)) + 2pin
Then solve for x by dividing by 3 and check where your solutions land by adding progressively larger n
6 solutions as Azyra also confirmed that
Wow, that is a lot more work than our class usually does. I guess that's the downside of the professor using a website with everything done outside of the class
🙂 well that happens
\
🙂
Normally with this professor it doesn't, just since he started using this website
I do wish he'd give us some harder problems so that we can carry it over to other classes
He makes all the exams/in-class really simple problems
yes an di suspect, he was not verifying this website difficutly level
andnow
you ahve all surprises
Can I use the same room for a new question or do I need to close and then re-open in a new channel?
your trig equation ebhaves liek quadratic equation
so plz substitue u = cost
pay attention that you only accept :
$\left| u \right|\le 1$
Joanna Angel
no
$2cos^{2}t-cost-1=0\Leftrightarrow \left( cost - 1 \right)\left( 2cost+1 \right)=0$
Joanna Angel
yes and each fo the gives you two solutions
Wait, wouldn't it be 3 solutions?
cos(t) is only 1 at one point
two
Really?
0
Oh, 2pi
and
but
2Pi
i agree 🙂
congrats 🙂
@opaque lintel Has your question been resolved?
yes
also please do not forget to put the angle theta (the 0 with a dash in the middle) or x
I intentionally leave it out, sorry
and no, I'm not changing that unless it's for exams
Only because they dock points
Don't know what to say. Either way, I gave up on the problem and just used a website to do it for me
Which sucks because Idk what it did to get those answers
i can help you factor thats no problem
This is as far as I got and I don't even know what's left to go on
gimme a second to copy down the problem ok?
Okay
its simple ab+a+b+1=(a+1)(b+1)
I'm going to start working on the next problem in the meantime
Ah hell, it's one of those rules I probably forgot
but how come one of them is 2 and the other one is 1
Where can I learn more about this trick/rule
the co -efficient 2 is on the cosine not the 1
(sin x + 1)*(2cos x + 1)
practice
??
I get that, but idk how to get it there
Yes, the website told me that here: @eager plover
FOIL
The FOIL part does not matter to me.
I need to know how to get to that step
I'll have to assume so, it's hard for me to see it
Either way I'm stuck on a new problem now
In math there’s a lot of don’t question it just memorize it formulas

Thank you

