#help-23
1 messages · Page 81 of 1
Its talking about the set i. The problem
I plugged in the numbers and got B
.close
Closed by @halcyon plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What the easiest and shortest math question that most people get wrong?
hard to say, depends what you mean by "most"
most high schoolers
freshman's dream
2+2 = fish
thats too ez
Kihei
lol
and this would be more suited in the discussion channels
you'd be surprised by how many people say 9
nah i'd just get ignored
wanna see
whach #discussion
watch
Closed by @thin bridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why u ping me lol
show work
^
jus saw you in a diff channel
thought you available lool
1/2bh = (1/2)(6√2)(3√2) = 18
is this not right???
the steps before wont een matter if this is wrong
i dont know cause i didnt work out the problem
if I can see the work before I can spot any errors
no point in me doing all the work if youve already done it
the area is half the product of the base (AB) and height (CD)
.close
Closed by @patent musk
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have functions: y^2 = 8x and y = x^2
They create an area which we rotate around Ox axis
That creates a 3D body which I have to find volume of
I understand that we have to find where these points cross eacher other:
x^2 = sqrt(8x)
x^4 = 8x
x^4 - 8x = 0
x(x^3 - 8) = 0
Where we have x_1 = 0 and x_2 = 2
Should I calculate it as
PI * integral{0, 2}[sqrt(8x) - x^2]^2dx
Or should I square each of them by themselves
So I get PI * integral{0,2}[8x - x^4]dx
Square each one differently
I'm pretty sure
That's the washer method
Mmhm yeah you would square each one
But why am I doing so
I understand there's some leftover area we don't really include within our volume
Shouldn't I first get "what I am rotating" then rotate it
Closed by @maiden barn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could some plz help me w this proof?
I’m pretty sure my 2nd and 3rd steps r incorrect
@fresh birch Has your question been resolved?
@fresh birch Has your question been resolved?
@fresh birch Has your question been resolved?
@fresh birch Has your question been resolved?
Wait, so
How would the proof look?
What would go in step 2?
Angle FEC and ACE are congruent and angle BFE is congruent to angle BAE by the alternate interior angles theorem?
@sudden nova
Could u plz look at where I’ve written “right answer?”
I wanna know if that’s right
<@&286206848099549185>
Plz, it’s important
Someone plz help
That is the proof
Does mine look right?
Just say by Angle Angle both are similar qed
So yk where it says “right answer?”
Do all of the steps look right?
Even the reasons?
Should be correct.
Wdym
Like, the second column
It depends on how specific you want it to be
Should be correct
@fresh birch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If we have: 2,4,4,5,5,7,9 the mean is 5 and the deviation is 2. My question is, isnt the standard deviation the same as the average deviation of all the values?
no
you might be talking about $\frac1n \sum |x_i - \bar x|$, but that is a different measure, and it is called the \textbf{mean absolute deviation}.
Ann
Okay, but doesn't the standard deviation tell us how spread out the values are from the mean?
sure does. but that alone is not enough to define the word "standard deviation" nor is it ever taken as a definition.
I know how it is computed. Basically one way is: sqrt(E(X^2) - (E(X))^2). So we get an idea on how spread out the values are from the mean, and here in the example we have 2. But if we only look at some values for instance 9, we see that the deviation from the mean is 4. So aren't we taking the average? Why is it defined the way it is which is sqrt(E(X^2) - (E(X))^2).
.
Where?
But if we only look at some values, for instance 9, we see that the deviation from the mean is 4. So are we not taking the average?
this is kind of a non-sequitur
and it sounds like some odd patterns in this particular data set caught your attention in a deadlock
I basically wonder why it is defined the way it is because intuitively one might think that we look at all the values and take the average spread from the mean
Yeah, I know but why is the standard deviation defined the way it is
Why sqrt(E(X^2) - (E(X))^2)
right. so you are looking for motivation as to why the stdev is defined as what it is.
yes, why did we choose this formula to be defined as the standard deviation
the stdev has a property not shared by the MAD: when you have two independent random variables X and Y, and consider their sum, their stdevs follow a sort of pythagorean theorem-like law: stdev(X+Y)^2 = stdev(X)^2 + stdev(Y)^2
or, since the square of standard deviation is frequently called the variance, you could say that variances of independent RVs add.
yeah okay, and the variance is also a value which show us how dispersed the data is in relation to the mean, but it is squared so big differences will be clearly indicated
.close
Closed by @supple monolith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Pls help
,rccw
It's gotta be similar to this
are you able to graph the lines y=x and y=-x?
No
have you graphed any straight lines before...?
Yes
then what is making you unable to graph y=x?
Because I don't get it
don't get what?
How to get it similar to this
forget about any mimicry of the last question...
please do as you are instructed.
are you able to just graph the line y=x?
Ys
But it's so stupid Y=x is same as y=-x
no, y=x is not the same as y=-1.
no, y=x is not the same as y=-x.
those are two different lines.
They are the same
you think they are the same point-for-point?
those are a select few points on the line y=x.
well, first draw an actual straight line through the points you've plotted so far. we still need the line y=x.
draw lines, not individual points.
i promise you that drawing some diagonal lines on the grid won't make your fingers fall off.
Well obviously but it's like this isn't
yes, "it" is "like this".
Closed by @loud jolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
wel
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For case 1, how come we can assume it’s unique solution for all values of k
And for the other cases, why do we check that the vector with K is linearly dependent with the original matrix?
@wanton pendant Has your question been resolved?
@wanton pendant Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain this:
try squaring some values of x between -1 and 1
you'll notice that they are always smaller than the original value
or the absolute value of the original value
$x^2 <= |x|$ for all $-1 \le x \le 1$
kheerii
Use \leq in place of <=
oh so like it means that the value of x will make the y=[f(x)]^2 closer to x?
closer to the x axis
can u explain what that means
they said that to me, not to you
they're talking about the latex
dw about it
ahh, and what about the second point in the pic ive sent
ohh okk
well
it's just the opposite of that
if you square some value greater than 1, it will be further away from 0
Closed by @gentle bramble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For the second part I’m a bit confused, how do you find the Fourier sine series for an interval of [0,1], from my knowledge I’ve only worked with intervals of [-L,L]? Another question I have is when you do the Fourier sine series of cosh(y) isn’t it equal to 0 since cosh(y) is an even function you would rather be using the Fourier cosine series to define it?
@unique valley Has your question been resolved?
show the entire question, including part (i)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For the second part I’m a bit confused, how do you find the Fourier sine series for an interval of [0,1], from my knowledge I’ve only worked with intervals of [-L,L]? Another question I have is when you do the Fourier sine series of cosh(y) isn’t it equal to 0 since cosh(y) is an even function you would rather be using the Fourier cosine series to define it?
Sorry it Timed-out
The first part is when they asked you to calculate the integrals explicitly
The second part is asking you to use the first part to find the Fourier sine series
you can always do a u-sub to get to [-L,L]
U-sub on what integral?
And am I correct when I said that you can’t write a Fourier sine series for cosh
@unique valley Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@unique valley Has your question been resolved?
@unique valley Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I go about solving this?
Expand cos(a - b)
quadrant information (and sin^2 + cos^2 = 1) allows you to find cos(a) and sin(b)
@misty crow Has your question been resolved?
I see so using the sum and difference formulas
Yup and then apply what chartbit said
Got it thanks.
Closed by @misty crow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is the correct answer for this A
Bcz
When u take
The sum of the entries in row i
The sum of the elements in each row = 1
@junior smelt am I correct
Ty
@halcyon plover Has your question been resolved?
Based off of gaussian elimination I got k=2
Doing reduced row echelon
The bottom row is zero
So the columns are dependent
@junior smelt
.close
Closed by @halcyon plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello great mathematicians.
So I would be grateful if someone could give me some application examples regarding derivative integrals, like following. What a possible application for that? Thanks in advance for your time
Hmm
@supple monolith Has your question been resolved?
@supple monolith Has your question been resolved?
@supple monolith Has your question been resolved?
sorry, are you asking 'what are some applications of integration' specifically?
Hi, thanks for your time. No, my question is regarding derivative of integrals(Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1). I know applications of integrals, and derivatives, but I don't know if that integral derivative is math exclusive, or we have some application in physics maybe?
Initial point of interest: https://openstax.org/books/calculus-volume-1/pages/5-3-the-fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
sorry if this question is a little pedantic, i just want to make sure i'm answering the right thing:
you're asking what application the theorem linking differentiation and integration as inverse functions has in other fields like physics?
Sorry, I hope I could understand your question, but probably yes. I know we could alias an integral using a function, like the F(x), and I understand it comes handy when whole expression could be invoked by F(x). I also understand derivating indefinite integrals results the based function were integrated.
Now I cannot understand when finding a derivative of a definite integral is needed? Like given F(x).
I really appreciate your time, thanks.
ah is your confusion 'okay, why did we need to even state this, does this have any use'?
all this theorem does is start off as a building block for what calculus actually is
so as a result, its application is pretty much everything integration is used in
the most simple and notable would be the physical relation between velocity and acceleration
more complex is its use in probability density and wavefunctions in quantum mechanics
Yes I see. So like integrating acceleration gives us velocity, and derivative velocity, the acceleration.
So if we assume that F(x) is actually acceleration function, so calling F(1) would give us velocity between 1, and 2, now I wonder what derivating F(x) would give us? I'm sorry if it's very unclear, I understand I may need to keep reading to grasp the releam behind it better. Thank you.
rather v(t) = s'(t) and a(t) = v'(t)
so i suppose if you wanted to directly use the fundamental theorem of calculus)
the derivative of the integral of s(t) dt = s(t)
is equivalent to the derivative of v(t) = s(t)
where v refers to velocity, s refers to displacement and a acceleration
more generally though the sheer amount one can actually do with integration and calculus as a whole when understanding that they are inverse operations is immense
it unlocks further study into analysis both real and complex, physical relationships as simple as motion equations to stuff like lagrangians and energy equations, and is used plenty across statistics as well
I really appreciate your time for going through this. And it seems I have to re-study that calculus theorem subject(probably from other source). I hope I'm lucky to find some examples like one shared. Thank you so much.
.close
Closed by @supple monolith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help me for my studies
wrong server
@floral pulsar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For question #28 here, does anyone know why 0 isn’t an answer?
Here’s what the teacher posted
But I’m not sure what restriction allows u to eliminate x = 0
Oh, length can’t be negative, right?
But how do I know to plug it in?
You look for extraneous solutions
Do I always have to plug 0s in and only 0s, or will it never be an answer?
So I have to plug both solutions in regardless of whether one’s a 0?
help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
Yes
What if I plug it in and get 0
For 2x for example
It’s not a negative, but it’s 0
Same thing?
Does it make sense for a side length to be a length of 0?
No
There's your answer
Similar triangles
How would I go abt that?
You have two triangles in that diagram, create a proportion
10/x=24/x?
No
You don't need to reply to every one of my messages
Those are the triangles
You can find it
Sure
Not sure what you are asking
Like how do u know that they’re similar
Because it had two right angles so 2 right triangles
Something you need to recall
Hypotenuse-Leg (HL) Triangle Congruence Theorem
Wait not that one
That's for congruent
Yeah
But it shares a side and angle
The top one, right?
The right angle
There's one labeled right angle
Sorry i was looking at the other one
You don't know anything about the angle at the top
Right so
That means they’re similar
Right?
?
I don’t think they’re similar @worthy hemlock
Plz help
I’ve got a test tmrw
Wait, I think I got it
I got 12 as my answer
Does that seem right?
<@&286206848099549185>
I just have one question
For #30, how do I know which side is 14-z as opposed to z?
Is it bc it’s drawn to be smaller here?
@fresh birch Has your question been resolved?
Do u know?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does Fermat's Little Theorem work for a semiprime modulus?
For RSA
@fiery socket Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I understand the two straight lines I am going to have but I am confused where they should meet if that makes sense
oh sorry that would have been helpful
correct
I have y = 3/2x - 1 and -3/2 + 5 but I am not sure where I should "limit" the two straight lines
for example g(x) = 3/2x -1 if x > something
is it where they intersect?
well yes
but
|1-x/2| has a turning point, so to speak
the point where 1-x/2 = 0
would be the intersecting point of the two lines
ohhh, so when working with absolute values in your equation you get the turning point by* making the values inside the absolute value equal to zero
would this be the case for all functions with an absolute value?
when there is one absolute value then yes
when there are multiple absolute values you have to separate it into more cases
so for this, I would have essentially two turning points as x = +-1
okay thank you, that clears a lot of problems up for me, I was stuck with finding where my turning points were
no worries
have a great evening / day where ever you are!
Closed by @twin smelt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Graphing
I need help with the first one on the table of y and x
What have you tried
I am doing a big paper and this question is 7 out of 15 graphs that I need to complete tables and plot them
And I think I may be confusing myself because of all teh past ones I jist did
Just substitute x=-4 in the f(x) so you get a value that is the 'y' you are trying to get
f(-2)=-2+2(-4)
And then.. i think you'll get it
My brain is tired so Im gonna collect my thinking here
So -2 + 2 x -4
So 2 x -4 equals -8
Plus -2 is -10
Is that the answer for the first one @limber jewel
Yup thats right
@lean otter Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with solving the equations:
a. x+15+3x-2x < 31-2 x+4
b. 2(x-3)-(x+6) > 4x+(x+2)
what do you mean
Like in the first one
x+15+3x-2x is just 2x+15 and its right hand side is -2x+35 and you can put the numerical terms on one side of the inequality and variables on one side
right okay
Like why would you write x+x when 2x is easier and clearer
yeah i understood
where does 4x<20 come from sorry?
Algebra
Taking the -2x to the right side it becomes +2x as we add two positive quantities the inequality does change direction
alright x<5
ill give it a try
I'll check the answer , tell me your final answer
Have u expanded the brackets
i forgot how to do it tbh
a(b+c)=ab+ac
2(x-3) is just 2x-6 and so we have 2x-6+x+6
Which is just x on the left side of the inequality
you messsed up the signs hel
its 2(x+3)
My bad now its right
No it’s not check the Q again
oh i did the question wrong the first time sorry
So thats 2x+6
its supposed to be 2(x+3)
Even if you got the question wrong that was still solvable to be honest
oh right
If its 2(x+3) its becomes 2x+6
So the left side becomes 2x+6-x+6
Its just x+12 on the left
My bad i messed up the signs above
Let me get it clearer this time
The left side is 2(x+3)-(x+6)
Which is 2x+6-x-6
2x-x is 1x
You get it?
but its still 2x in the front?
1+2 is the same as 2+1 so you can just rearrange(as long as you dont change signs)
Aka commutative property
wait so what were doing isnt multiplying the x's in this? (x+3)-(x+6)
No no no we are subtracting
Yup
but to write it out wouldnt it need to be multiplied?
is anyone able to write it on paper with explenation of what actually is being done
Ok give me a sec
thank you
wait you can do - *x?
- just means -1
right so its -1*x?
right thats what was confusing me i think
i was thinking you had to do x * x and x* 6
That happens a lot when you hurry so see the question carefully , and process it slowly
Ok give it a try
okay so what do i need to do after this
how would that be
how does it go from -4x to positive x?
Divide both sides by -4
You get -4x/-4 in the left
And its 2/-4 in the right
The left becomes x and the right becomes -1/4
But if we multiply or divide by negative number the inequality changes direction
So it becomes x<-1/2
Give me a sec
x<-2/4 is the same as x<-1/2
i think i understood it then
Cheers then
wait when do i know when to switch the side > goes to
Just remember when you multiply or divide by a negative number you switch signs
alright ill try to remember that
yeah okay i got it, thank you very much
Np
.close
Closed by @broken wagon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i drew this diagram. i know that triangles COD and AOB are similar. and i could probably use the triangles that have have a base on AC. besides that, im stuck. any hints?
anyone? <@&286206848099549185>
think about the areas of triangle ACD and BCD
ooooh. they are congruent right?
since they have the same base and the same height
Closed by @patent vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i solve this?
i dont want a full solution
maybe start by finding the centre of triangle OLM
its poorly drawn but
by centre, i mean the intersection of all the medians (the lines that bisects the sides)
how does this relate to the centre of the small circle?
is it exactly the center of the small circle?
idk, still thinking about it
take your time
oh wait
OC = LC
since we know angle LOC already, we know everything
@patent vault Has your question been resolved?
do we know it?
this is not true, the circumcenter is the center of the smaller circle, not the centroid.
assuming c is the circumcenter, we can find LCM by inscribed angle theorem, and then we subtract 360 to find LOM
but LCM isn't an inscribed angle
LOM is, and we know LOM=78
Result:
39
oh that's smart thanks
360-39=321 which is wrong
it’s 360-78*2
just by looking you can tell 321 is wrong, so you should’ve checked your work again
Result:
204
.close
Closed by @patent vault
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain the 2nd and last line?
I’m guessing they split the integral so the 50 is coming from the integral of x dx from 10 to 0
But then ngl I don’t even know what the hell [x] dx integral is
they def did this
idk abt the integral of that
If only I had a lecturer capable of actually explaining stuff
The easiest way is to just draw the picture and calculate the integral without the fundamental theorem.
I don’t get that at all
I think the lecturer spent 95% of the time doing this but it just looked like scribbles to me
[x] is just a step function. So draw the picture and directly find the area or break it up into 10 integrals from 0 to 1, from 1 to 2 etc
I don’t understand what I’m supposed to be drawing tho 😭
The graph of f(x) = [x] from 0 to 10
Is it like a ladder?
So is it jumping up 1 every time?
Also are you saying to partition it and then work out the sum?
Isn’t that the long way? Seems way more complex
@novel cargo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The fraction confused me
Vanilla is 1/2 of all sales
mhm
1/2 means a half
which is 0.5
45
And what’s strawberry?
1/3
So how many scoops
30
vanila is 15 more than strawberry
Correct
so 15 is the scoops?
Read the question
so yup
Closed by @autumn vine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rccw
did u seriously close ur previous channel
and open another LOL
I told u: observe that $10^{\log (1.08^{10})} = 1.08^{10}$ and also that $\log (1.08^{10}) = 10 \log 1.08$
Lol
Saccharine
can you calculate that
can you calculate 10 log 1.08
Isn’t it just 1.08^10
yeah but calculating that is difficult
don't you understand that your job is to actually calculate 1.08^10
Then what’s the other way to calculate
Yea
But idk how the answer is 2.16
Wait
Would u divide 10 by 0.334
no
Then what
I said this
do you understand what that log table lets you calculate?
Yes
what does it let you calculate
it's not a particularly difficult explanation
why do they print the log table
it's to give you the values of certain types of calculations
Yea that
what are those calculations
.
Calculations are for the logs
what does that mean
No clue
Okay why does this matter
I needa find the answer
10log1.08
What do u do
because if you knew
what these calculations were and why they mattered
perhaps you'd be able to figure it out
I didn't
Bruh
I asked you what calculations a log table lets you do quickly without a calculator
you didn't answer
I have no clue
what do the values on a log table mean
idk if a whole table means "logarithms"
The results
It means the Logarithm of a number is the exponent to which the base must be raised to produce that number
Bruh
what does a log table help you do
like why do you have a log table
what's useful about it
It helps u find the values easier
Without having to use a calculator
And more precise answer
Wdym
yes I am
what might you use a times table for?
results of what
what does a "result of number" even mean
Just biject it to a planar semigroup whose elements are Cauchy Turing machines
make what easier
solve what
ok
Closed by @peak crane
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would we say a function has a horizontal asymptote y=a if f(infinity)=a?
f(infinity) makes little sense
its better if you said limit as x -> infinity f(x) = a.
@north raven Has your question been resolved?
cool
riemann integration can't be hindered by jump discontinuities/sharp corners right?
bc we'd be able to compute f(x) at all points
would removable discontinuities possibly hinder it?
since we won't be able to compute f(x) at the discontinuity
@north raven Has your question been resolved?
IS ANYONE OF CLASS9
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do I graph a line that does not exist at x=4 on desmos?
piecewise function
@icy nymph https://www.desmos.com/calculator/c3hoxtxz1l something like this
or multiply it by (x-4)/(x-4) so theres a hole at x=4
that also works
ah ok. i was looking for a more general solution anyways, not specifically this graph but thanks
ig i'll just have to break it up
multiply by (x-c)/(x-c) to add a hole at x=c
yea that works thanks
why does it not show it on the graph tho. i was hoping for a visualization for my notes actually lol
oh well, thats just a desmos being desmos. this works still thanks
.close
Closed by @icy nymph
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't understand why f(x) is 2 when x is -2
Pretty sure that 2(-2) +2 =-4+2
=-2
do you know what the | | means?
No
I see ok thanks
but note that |2| is still 2
so it just changes negative numbers to positive and positive stays the same
I will keep that in mind thanks
.close
Closed by @crude lantern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i do this
integration along the y axis might do the trick
the equatiosn are already on the y axis
im just thinking if i could do it in one integration
or does it have to multiple
1 intiegration
You could integrate with respect to y or x. If you integrate with respect to y, you would only have 1 integral
dont have answers
compute the integral
You don’t need to change the equations. It is already in terms of y
.close
Closed by @little sorrel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Do you know what is the definition of tangent?
touches eachother
Mathematical definition?
I know 😅 , but in terms of math?
idk man
just skip this
In geometry, the tangent line to a plane curve at a given point is the straight line that "just touches" the curve at that point. Leibniz defined it as the line through a pair of infinitely close points on the curve. Wikipedia
You can't , the solution depends on it, tangent in mathematics means they have the same slope
If they are tangent you need to show they have the same slope right?
What is the slope of y=x+b?
1
And what is the slope for the other y ?
What x?
Is that how you find the slope for everything x?
That is the equation of y, we want to find the slope equation for this y to see on what x we get the same slope
Did you learn how to diff?
@little sorrel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I should find all values for x with 0 <= x <= pi/2 for tan(3x) + tan(2x) = 0.
I tried with theorems and used that tan = sin/cos, but my equation gets longer and longer instead of finding a way to solve the problem.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
you can use the fact that tan is pi periodic to avoid expanding everything out
use trig identities
also what's going on with your denominator?
just make it cos(2x)*cos(3x)
and since it's equal to 0 you can get rid of it
also cos(2x)sin(3x)+cos(3x)sin(2x)=0
just equals to sin(2x+3x)=0
now using the general solution method will give you the full answer
Okay one moment, I will try
Okay, I made the denominator to cos(2x)*cos(3x), but what did you mean with "and since it's equal to 0 you can get rid of it"?
(5x+1)/2=0
5x+1=0
Okay in other words you mean, I just have to find the solutions for sin(5x) thats equal to zero, because the denominator can't be zero?
okay like so:
So then should be the only solution for x. x = 0, because we are on the intervall [0, pi/2]
take out the denominator
multiply both sides by cos3x cos2x
you're left with sin(5x)=0
Closed by @rotund salmon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hint: look at the denominator
that fraction is unreadable and I have no idea what you mean
if you cannot latex it write it out on a piece of paper
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to the original message being deleted
What do you want to achieve?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you write this as a piecewise function
$$f(x) = |x-3| - |2x+1|$$
choufleur ❦
remember the definition of the absolute value function
|x| = x, x>0; -x, x<0
apply that in this
small caveat: you are missing 0
x when x>=0 will fix it
yes indeed
@wise sky Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.