#help-23

1 messages · Page 3 of 1

quasi bison
#

that is a good strategy.

zenith glen
#

I'll do that first then

#

But I've no idea how to do the second one

versed vector
#

wdym

#

you can use the sin^-1/cos^-1/tan^-1 function on your calculator to find the angle

zenith glen
#

Wait

#

You mean the angle for BFC?

#

Hmm

quasi bison
#

BFC yes

zenith glen
#

Ohh

#

Sorry, I didn't read the question well enough

#

Thanks for clarifying

#

This was embarrassing xD

#

Thanks a lot

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @zenith glen

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

opaque sorrel
safe radishBOT
opaque sorrel
#

Log n! = log 1 +... + log n ~ integrate (1, n) log x dx

#

can someone briefly explain this to me?

upbeat adder
#

the first step is Log n! = log 1 +... + log n

#

do you understand that part?

opaque sorrel
#

yes

#

its just expanding n! right

upbeat adder
#

yep

opaque sorrel
#

okay

#

whats next

upbeat adder
#

ok, now we'd like to get a rough idea of what that is equal to

#

and essentially, we're taking a sum of values of the logarithm function

#

we don't have a great way to know exactly what its equal to without just calculating

#

but we using the trick of integration to find an approximation

#

so usually we think of integration as summing up thinner and thinner rectangles under the curve of the function we want to integrate

opaque sorrel
#

right

upbeat adder
#

and so to approximate the integral, one might use rectangles of a certain width

#

say 0.25

opaque sorrel
#

okay

upbeat adder
#

so if I want to integrate a function f from 1 to 2, I'd say it's about f(1)*0.25 + f(1.25)*0.25 + f(1.5)*0.25 + f(1.75)*0.25

#

have you seen this type of stuff before?

opaque sorrel
#

not quite but i think i roughly follow

upbeat adder
#

if your step is of size i, then the area of the k-th rectangle under the curve is f(a + ki)*i where a is the start of the interval

#

f(a+ki) is the value of the function at the start of the rectangle, and i is the width

#

so by multiplying them you get the area of that rectangle

#

is that clear?

opaque sorrel
#

one sec im trying to sum up what uve been saying to see whether im understanding u properly

upbeat adder
#

I might be explaining it very badly but its the basic idea of integration, sum up lots of rectangles under the curve and the step size i tends to 0 to give you the value of the integral

opaque sorrel
#

okay so to sum up wat ur tryna say:
we are trying to find log(n!), aka finding the sum of values of the logarithm function

integration is a bunch of rectangles below a curve, so now were using this tactic to find the approximated value of log(n!)

we expand it to log1 + log2 + log3 + ...
so the rectangles under the graph would be like f(1) * a + f(2) * a + ..., where a is the area of a rectangle under the graph

upbeat adder
#

I should have been more clear, I'm doing a bit of the detour with the integration stuff

#

what I'm trying to get at is that usually, you use rectangles to approximate an integral

opaque sorrel
#

right

upbeat adder
#

but in our case here, we will be doing the exact opposite, we'll be using the integral which we know the value of (since we know the integral of log x) and we'll notice that our log(n!) is actually summing up rectangles in such a way as to sort of approximate that integral

opaque sorrel
#

right

#

how does this imply log n! ~= n log n tho?

opaque sorrel
upbeat adder
#

because notice that you're summing up values of logarithm with a step size of 1, each time you evaluate it 1 further

opaque sorrel
#

yeah

upbeat adder
#

so log 1 + log 2 + log 3 + ....

#

that's like setting i = 1

#

the width is 1 and the step size is 1

#

so whatever it is equal to should be somewhat close to the integral of log x, since its an approximation of log x

opaque sorrel
#

i dont quite get the i = 1

#

sorry, but do u mind drawing it out lol

#

i think itll be easier to understand on a graph

upbeat adder
#

I can try, yeah

opaque sorrel
#

tysm

upbeat adder
#

not sure how I'll send it

opaque sorrel
#

hmm

upbeat adder
#

I'll take a picture

opaque sorrel
#

maybe just a really brief sketch

#

yes sure

upbeat adder
#

sorry its taking a while

opaque sorrel
#

yep sure nw

#

ur the one helping XD

upbeat adder
#

darn

#

how do I rotate

opaque sorrel
#

umm

upbeat adder
#

there's a command

opaque sorrel
#

im not sure

#

yea

#

someone help

#

.rotate

#

,rotate

flat frigateBOT
opaque sorrel
#

oh dam

#

,rotate 180

flat frigateBOT
opaque sorrel
#

,rotate 90

flat frigateBOT
opaque sorrel
#

aye

upbeat adder
#

there ya go

opaque sorrel
#

lemem take a look

upbeat adder
#

so the integral of log x is the area under the curve

#

and I drew these boxes here that seem to, if I were to sum up their area, be about equal to the area under the curve

#

and how do I calculate their area? well their width is always 1, and their height is just the value of log at the start of the box

#

so for the k-th box, it's log(k)

#

so we sum up their area by doing the sum of log(k) for k going from 1 to n

opaque sorrel
#

how did u know that their width is always 1

#

is it just something that we decided on

upbeat adder
#

yeah

#

I chose the box to be that way

opaque sorrel
#

ohh right

#

i follow yes

upbeat adder
#

so you agree that the area of all those boxes combined is our log 1 + log 2 + log 3 + ... ?

opaque sorrel
#

yepp

upbeat adder
#

ok, but now if we know the value of the integral, we get an approximation for that sum right?

#

since they roughly represent the same area

opaque sorrel
#

wait one momenet

#

so now i understood this: log n! = log 1 + log2 + ... logn

#

and that this is just the area under curve

#

for logn!

upbeat adder
#

not quite no

opaque sorrel
#

then now we are going to try to approximate it

#

oh

upbeat adder
#

log n! is just a number, its not a function

#

so log n! has no curve

#

instead, we know that log n! is exactly equal to the area of all the boxes I drew

opaque sorrel
#

ah so its a number that represents the approximated area under curve

upbeat adder
#

yes

opaque sorrel
#

under the log curve consisting of log1 + ... logn

#

okay

#

so now we are trying to find the approximation for it

#

which can be represented in
log n! ~= n log n or (the pic)

upbeat adder
#

sterling's approximation is actually quite hard to get to

opaque sorrel
#

oh i see

#

how about nlogn?

upbeat adder
#

the approximation we get is much simpler

#

n logn is what we get, yeah

opaque sorrel
#

ohh i see

upbeat adder
#

its a worse approximation, but much easier to establish

opaque sorrel
#

so how do we get to it o.o

upbeat adder
#

so logn! is the exact area of all the boxes combined

#

but the area of all the boxes combined is an approximation for the exact area under the curve of log x

#

therefore, log n! is an approximation for the exact area under the curve of log x

opaque sorrel
#

right

upbeat adder
#

but that goes both ways, the exact area under the curve of log x is an approximation for log n!

opaque sorrel
#

right

upbeat adder
#

so now we just need to calculate that exact area, and we get our approximation for log n!

#

and how do we calculate the exact area under the curve of log x?

opaque sorrel
#

its not by integration right? since we established that integration is an approximation

upbeat adder
#

integration is not an approximation

#

if you integrate the function, you get the exact area under the curve

#

I might have confused you with my previous things

#

the integral itself is exact

opaque sorrel
#

oh but the one we did is that we made the "boxes" larger and made the height log x

#

so the one we did is an approximation

upbeat adder
#

yeah

opaque sorrel
#

cus the real integration has much smaller widths

#

oh

upbeat adder
#

the boxes are an approximation of the integral

#

yes, exactly

opaque sorrel
#

ah i see

#

so we can integrate the log curve

upbeat adder
#

yep

opaque sorrel
#

to get the exact value

upbeat adder
#

of the area, yeah

#

there is a little detail that might be easy to miss, but its about the interval on which we integrate log x

opaque sorrel
#

wait i still dont quite see how we can get nlogn, sorry

#

i get everything weve discussed but not nlogn

upbeat adder
#

we'll get to it

opaque sorrel
#

oh

#

right

upbeat adder
#

so notice on my little drawing firstly that the very first box is actually just a line with no height, since log 1 = 0

opaque sorrel
#

right

upbeat adder
#

but also that if you count only the first box, then in theory you get an approximation of the area under the curve of log x between 1 and 2

opaque sorrel
#

which is 0?

#

cus theres no height

upbeat adder
#

yeah that's why I say in theory, obviously its a bad approximation but I'm making a point about the interval of integration

opaque sorrel
#

ah i see

upbeat adder
#

if I take the first 2 boxes, they go from 1 to 3, first box goes from 1 to 2 then second from 2 to 3

#

so if I take n boxes, I'm actually approximating the integral of log x from 1 to n + 1 instead of from 1 to n as you might expect initially

opaque sorrel
#

right

upbeat adder
#

so we get log n! ~= integral log x dx from 1 to n+1

opaque sorrel
#

right

upbeat adder
#

have you ever integrated the log function?

opaque sorrel
#

uh lemme think

#

nope

#

im looking at it online now

upbeat adder
#

ok, so there's a little trick

#

you can do it by parts, if you take one of the parts to be u = 1

#

log x = 1 * log x

#

it sort of comes out of nowhere but this is an integral that is just good to know

opaque sorrel
#

alright

#

ill try some later

upbeat adder
#

you can work it out yourself if you want, or you can just believe me that you get x*log x - x as the answer

#

you can check by differentiating that, it gives you log x + 1 - 1 = log x

opaque sorrel
upbeat adder
#

yep

opaque sorrel
#

right

upbeat adder
#

and since this integral has bounds, you just evaluate it at those bounds

opaque sorrel
#

right

#

okay wait so

#

log(n!) can be expressed as log1 + ... logn

#

then in the rectangles drawn

#

the first rectangle has height 0 so the area under curve is 0 which is theoretically right

#

then since to find exact area under curve for logn from range 1 ... n + 1, we integrate log(n!)

#

and we will get x *logx - x

#

then we have to sub the 1 and n + 1 inside

#

these are the "bounds"

#

then im assuming after this we would get xlogx?

upbeat adder
opaque sorrel
#

ah right

opaque sorrel
upbeat adder
#

well we can check

opaque sorrel
#

thing is, isnt this the exact value under curve

#

wait no

#

its because of the 0 - 1 rectangle

#

so its inaccurate but approximately accurate

#

i think

upbeat adder
#

yeah

#

not just the first rectangle

opaque sorrel
#

ahhh i see

upbeat adder
#

all the rectangles have a small mistake

opaque sorrel
upbeat adder
#

but it gets smaller and smaller

#

yes

#

thats the approximation

opaque sorrel
#

ah okay i see

#

interesting

#

thanks so much dude

upbeat adder
#

no problem

opaque sorrel
#

when did u learn this

upbeat adder
#

I kind of learned it several times

#

but in discrete maths I did an exercise which made me kind of figure it out by myself

#

but I had seen very similar things before

opaque sorrel
#

ah i see..

#

do u mind if i ask u these types of qns in the future lol

#

cus ur explanation is really clear compared to alot of other people here ngl

#

but if u dont want me disturbing its fine haha

upbeat adder
#

I might not be available super often, but I don't mind the idea

opaque sorrel
#

ill close this

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @opaque sorrel

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

upbeat adder
safe radishBOT
feral linden
#

Ask

#

Strange person

trim venture
#

Dr.Strange Multiverse of Madness

#

jk

#

see above

upbeat adder
#

woops

#

how did that happen

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @upbeat adder

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lucid tartan
#

Hey guys I've got a question. Was anyone in grade 10/ year 11 and planning to go to the ib or ap track? If anyone is now in thd ib or ap track can you tell me the topics you guys studied in that year 11 / grade 10 not only for math but other subjects please? Thank you.

warm cosmos
#

well im in 11 now in calc ab

#

so i dont think i can really help you

lucid tartan
#

Ohhh alright thanks tho. Tho do u have any advice that could be helpful for me this year?

warm cosmos
#

what year are you in, and what are your classes right now

lucid tartan
#

I'm turning year 11/ grade 10 my classes r math physics bio chem English drama moral education history i think that's pretty much it the rest is related to languages of my homecountry and stuff

#

Tho this year I will be taking calculus and that other stuff

safe radishBOT
#

@lucid tartan Has your question been resolved?

warm cosmos
#

I would just say organize yourself and dont fall behind on anything

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

smoky aspen
#

is this correct?

safe radishBOT
smoky aspen
cyan mantle
#

4x4 matrix

smoky aspen
#

would you be able to explain

safe radishBOT
#

@smoky aspen Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @smoky aspen

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

bold aurora
#

I’m trying to do this with polar coordinates up top. Where am I going wrong? Is it wrong for me to cancel the derivative with the integral there somehow?

bold aurora
#

Nvm I was integrating by parts wrong at the end

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @bold aurora

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

safe radishBOT
plucky elk
#

Is this just spam?

#

Yea definitely self promoting spam

severe laurel
#

<@&268886789983436800>

warped roost
#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @warped roost

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

supple coral
#

Hello guys,

I have to learn about implication at the moment. I have a problem with the third case and hope someone can finally clear it out for me.

Let's say p->q.

Why is it that if p is wrong and q true the whole statement is true?

If I say it's raining is p and q the street is wet, the statement says its not raining but the street is wet. Why is this statement true if the forth statement says when its not raining the street is not wet. Doesn't the third and forth statement contradict themselfs?

And how can the street be wet when it's not raining?

I understand that the original statement when it's raining the street is wet does not have any relation with the third and fourth case cause the p is not fulfilled. But why do mathematicians still say that the third and fourth case are still true although we can't verify any of our original statement with it.

Isn't it better to write a question mark there cause we can't tell?

severe laurel
#

In mathematics and logic, a vacuous truth is a conditional or universal statement (a universal statement that can be converted to a conditional statement) that is true because the antecedent cannot be satisfied. For example, the statement "all cell phones in the room are turned off" will be true when no cell phones are in the room. In this case,...

open birch
#

@supple coral p -> q means that 'p implies q'. Which, translated, means that if p is true then q must be true. If p is not true, the statement says nothing about q. q might be false, it might be true. Therefore, the whole statement is true because p was not true -- therefore the statement isn't wrong

supple coral
#

So you guys say that because we can't prove our statement in those cases we can't say it's wrong and therefor have to say it's true?

But doesn't that implication in logic bring a lot of problems with it?

If any of those cases in logic is used, it is not the truth, but it is the vacuous truth, which means it can't be proven. If it can't be proven logic that uses those cases is unusable in a practical matter?

#

@clr @hsp

misty bay
#

you could technically assign other truth values to such statements, but they would make a lot of dealing with it very inconvenient (you'd have to special case a lot of things in general statements)

#

for example, one pretty intuitive notion is that if something is true for all members of set B, then it's true for all members of set A if A is a subset of B

#

what if A is the empty set?

#

are you going to have to qualify "except the empty set" after each time you say that?

#

people choose to define p->q as "not p or q" because it makes everything much easier

#

we want things like q -> q to be intuitively true without considering the truth value of q

#

if you make the comment that "p -> q" should be false or indeterminate when p is false, then suddenly you have a whole lot of inconvenience

#

another example deals with the laws of arithmetic: maybe we like to formalize the fact that if x = y, then x + 1 = y + 1, perhaps as an implication (x = y) -> (x+1 = y+1). Under schemes where you don't accept vacuous truth, then are you going to say that the implication based on the laws of arithmetic is invalid or semi-valid when I say something like 0 = 1 and derive 1 = 2 from that?

safe radishBOT
#

@supple coral Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lean otter
#

Find all f:R->R that satisfies

safe radishBOT
lean otter
#

I'm pretty much stuck on this, I tried plugging in a few numbers but I couldn't find anything useful

#

Can someone give me an idea on where to start on this?

safe radishBOT
#

@lean otter Has your question been resolved?

jagged bluff
#

Not sure what the final answer will be, but definitely useful to plug in x=0.

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

flint nest
#

x2+y2= 25

safe radishBOT
flint nest
#

how do I isolate Y

#

I'm literally a 4.0 student, I just saved math for the last year of my degree because it gives me nightmares

#

whatever I don't have to defend myself

#

help

#

well I need to figure out if this is a function. the prof says to isolate Y

dreamy comet
flint nest
#

okay so not a function because of the square root

dense token
#

cos(cos x)

#

what rule do i apply?

#

how do i dfferntiate this?

cedar rover
dense token
#

oh shit someonese channel mb

cedar rover
safe radishBOT
#

@flint nest Has your question been resolved?

cedar rover
safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

cedar rover
#

f

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vital dirge
#

What does z sub k mean?

safe radishBOT
vital dirge
#

I was watching ta video about De Moivres theorem

safe radishBOT
#

@vital dirge Has your question been resolved?

little geyser
#

can you show the complete expression of z subscript k?

#

might be able to help than

quasi bison
#

@vital dirge there is not one n'th root but n

#

in this video they are named z_1, z_2, ..., z_n

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

hidden oriole
#

why when I move a function y=kx+b left horizontally for a units, the the function will be y=k(x+a)+b and not y=k(x-a)+b

dense tiger
#

Think about it graphically

hidden oriole
#

I thought about it graphically

#

still didn't work

lean otter
#

you're moving it to the left

tranquil sentinel
#

Instead of thinking of it as moving your function to the left by an amount a, think of it as moving your graph to the right by an amount a

lean otter
#

so you're moving it a negative amount

#

so say you move it 4 units left

#

then it would be y=k(x-(-4))+b

hidden oriole
#

I still don't get it

tranquil sentinel
#

It's how that works...

whole acorn
#

just think of it as a graph going up and down, if you add, the graph goes up and the function will look like it shifts to the left

lean otter
#

wait really?

#

you're moving the graph?

#

i thought it was moving the function

tranquil sentinel
#

It's the same thing seen in different ways

#

It's just to understand where the seemingly wrong sign comes from

silver condor
#

Think of a line y=x
y is 1 when x is 1 right

But if you give the x side a bonus one.
y=x+1
Then you can get the y value of 1 while x is zero

whole acorn
silver condor
#

Plus one to x, is like saying x needs one less to get the same y value

lean otter
#

i always learned it like inside is opposite, outside is the same

hidden oriole
#

wait wait I get it now thanks

lean otter
#

so if it's inside parenthesis then you change the signs

#

and if it's outside then it stays the same

hidden oriole
#

ok

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hidden oriole

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

soft pine
#

Hi, I am stuck here in the "explain your reasoning" part I have done the calculations and have gotten K = 0,1 but I do not know how to explain the reasoning

thin token
#

the condition is

#

lhl=rhl= f(0)

hexed night
#

Exactly

#

You need to calculate the limits for x->0 for RHL and LHL

#

And then equate the two and find K

soft pine
#

i see

#

how would you explain that after you get the limits and find K

hexed night
#

What do you mean

#

We don't need a further explanation

soft pine
#

it asks you to explain the reasoning

#

so I thought we needed extra explainations

hexed night
thin token
#

yea basically write it in a full sentence form

hexed night
#

That's the definition of a continuous function at a point

thin token
#

yes exactly

soft pine
#

ohhh okay

#

I get it

#

thank you guys

thin token
#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @thin token

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

amber kelp
#

Find the probability of picking 3 vowels and 2 consonants when 5 letters are picked (without replacement) from a set of alphabet tiles

amber kelp
#

So far I have 5/26 *4/25 * 3/24 for the probability of the vowels

#

But I think that might be off

dense tiger
#

Are you familiar with the choose function

#

Like 3 choose 2 =3

amber kelp
#

No

dense tiger
#

Are you familiar with factorials

amber kelp
#

Yeah

dense tiger
#

What class is this may I ask?

amber kelp
#

Algebra 2

dense tiger
#

Gotcha

amber kelp
#

So I’m learning P(ab)=P(a)*P(b following a )

#

For dependent probability

#

Or

#

P(ab)=P(a)*P(b)

#

For independent probability

amber kelp
hexed night
#

@amber kelp have you been taught permutations and combinations?

#

Combinatorics?

amber kelp
#

Yeah

#

When order matters or doesn’t matter in statistics

hexed night
#

So you are familiar with nCr?

amber kelp
#

Yep

hexed night
#

Cool

dense tiger
#

n c r

#

is n choose r

hexed night
#

So the total ways of choosing 5 letters from the alphabet is 26C5

#

Do you understand why?

amber kelp
#

Ohhh that makes sense

#

Yeah

#

Except since every time you take the letter out and it stays out, do both numbers just drop one??

hexed night
#

No we are just talking about the number of ways for now

#

Not the replacement

amber kelp
#

Ok

hexed night
#

That calculation will be as follows: There are 26C5 choices for you to choose a 5 letter word. The choices to choose 3 vowels are 5C3

#

And the choices to select the 2 consonants are 21C2

#

So the total number of ways of selecting a word with 3 vowels and 2 consonants is 5C3 × 21C2

amber kelp
#

So 2100?

hexed night
#

Now to get the probability you need to divide this by 26C5, the total ways

amber kelp
#

Oh that makes sense

#

So 2100/65780

hexed night
#

Yes

amber kelp
#

Or 105/3289

signal osprey
#

damn i like this solution

#

nice KD

amber kelp
#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @amber kelp

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

amber kelp
#

.reopen

safe radishBOT
#

amber kelp
#

So you always have all 26 letters each time

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @amber kelp

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

little sorrel
safe radishBOT
little sorrel
#

idk how to do

foggy salmon
#

initial velocity is when t=0

#

acceleration is rate of change of v so differentiate v wrt t

#

when u get an expression for acceleration, solve for when it equals to zero

#

the last one u can take the time obtained in part c and sub it in to get max velocity

safe radishBOT
#

@little sorrel Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @little sorrel

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

sand condor
#

Need help

safe radishBOT
sand condor
#

Got stuck here

upbeat swan
#

,rotate

flat frigateBOT
safe radishBOT
#

@sand condor Has your question been resolved?

sand condor
#

<@&286206848099549185>

safe radishBOT
#

@sand condor Has your question been resolved?

molten crest
#

What according to you comes next?

#

@sand condor

#

(2^1/3)^1/2 gives us what

#

?

sand condor
#

Because 1/3 doesent have same numerator

molten crest
#

(a^n)^m is the first question, let's tackle this step by step

#

And also

#

You've nearly solved the problem\

sand condor
#

Easy that’s a^nm

molten crest
#

Exactly

#

Now

#

Do the same with

#

(2^1/3)^1/2

sand condor
#

Dont we need same numerator

molten crest
#

Ye

#

We'll make them same

sand condor
#

Nearest is 6

molten crest
#

Again, first, what's this (2^1/3)^1/2?

#

Like you've said before

#

With the a^mn example

sand condor
#

1*.5 = 0.5

molten crest
#

The fractional form, please

#

Huh?

#

(2^1/3)^1/2 = 2^(1/3 * 1/2)

#

Got it until here?

sand condor
#

2^1/3 * 1/2 = 2/6 *3/6?

#

5/6?

molten crest
#

It's 2 raised to 1/2, remember?

sand condor
#

Yes

#

2^5/6?

molten crest
#

How did you arrive at 5/6?

sand condor
#

Cus we need same numerator

molten crest
#

Have you learnt how to multiply two fractions? Could you help me out with a/b * d/c

sand condor
#

Ad/bc

molten crest
#

Exactly

#

So, when we do 1/2 * 1/3, we get...

sand condor
#

1/6

molten crest
#

Yes

#

Good job

#

1/6

#

Now, we have 2^(1/6) x 2^(-4/3)

sand condor
#

Ok

molten crest
#

Now, we have to make the denominators equal

#

Can you tell me why?

sand condor
#

Because we have Base 2

molten crest
#

Yes

#

Because we have the base = 2 in both the terms

#

What happens when we multiply them?

#

What is a^b x a^c

sand condor
#

A^b+c

molten crest
#

Yes

#

So, now

#

We have 2^(1/6) x 2^(-4/3) = 2^{1/6 + (-4/3)}

sand condor
#

(-8/6)

#

2^-7/6

molten crest
#

Yes

#

Good job

sand condor
#

My answers are giving me diffrent

molten crest
#

Did you the calculations right until here?

sand condor
#

Is ours wrong or this

molten crest
#

Ours is wrong

sand condor
#

Why is ours wrong

molten crest
#

Wait...

sand condor
molten crest
#

Yes

sand condor
#

What was it

molten crest
#

You missed a 2^1/3

sand condor
#

How

#

Idk How they got that answer

molten crest
#

ignore the arrow mark

safe radishBOT
#

@sand condor Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @sand condor

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

novel magnet
safe radishBOT
novel magnet
#

I don’t understand how they got the second step

tawny bone
#

now you are only integrating

#

$2\int{u^{-3}}$

#

wellll

#

and then you can factor out the 4 as awell

novel magnet
#

Oh

#

Ok

flat frigateBOT
#

Rαιη

tawny bone
#

so the 4 and $\frac{1}{2}$ cancels out to get the 2

flat frigateBOT
#

Rαιη

safe radishBOT
#

@novel magnet Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

pliant zephyr
#

a

safe radishBOT
worthy hemlock
#

b?

pliant zephyr
#

sorry was just trying to claim haha

#

sorry

cedar rover
#

ahah it's ok, what's the question?

pliant zephyr
#

basically im doing some u-substitution but im stuck after getting u and du let me get the question typed up rq and ill walk though what i've done so far

cedar rover
#

If you don't want to type you can send a photo of your work

pliant zephyr
#

well actually its not much work ill just paste a pic of the question and explain what i have

#

so I have
u = e^2x
du = 2e^2x dx

but now I am confused if I even used the right term to sub cause i believe I could sub everything if I make e^2x u and the composition in the sin du and have 5/2 outside the integral

#

but i dont know if thats even correct

cedar rover
#

thonkstein How about u = 5e^(2x)? That will make stuff easier

#

So we don't leave that 5 inside the sin

pliant zephyr
#

ah word so
u = 5e^2x
du = 10e^2x dx

#

yeah i just did that and it was 10x easier lol

cedar rover
#

Did you get it?

pliant zephyr
#

yes i got -1/10 cos (5e^2x)

#

tysm

cedar rover
#

Nice, well done

pliant zephyr
#

have a great day thanks again

cedar rover
#

u too

pliant zephyr
#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @pliant zephyr

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

pliant zephyr
#

$\int{4sin^{3}(t)cos(t) dt$

safe radishBOT
flat frigateBOT
#

heep
Compile Error! Click the errors reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)

pliant zephyr
#

if i wanna find the intergral i could move the 4 out of the intergral and just do substitution to solve it right?

proper crypt
#

Yes, 4 multiplied by the integral

pliant zephyr
#

bet and if I wanted sin^3(t) to be U the deriative would have to do the chain rule twice for the exponent and the trig function right?

final halo
#

Think of a more simple sub

pliant zephyr
#

could i do just sin(t) and have u^3 du?

final halo
#

Hell yeah

pliant zephyr
#

word I just get confused with the format of trig functions and exponents lol

#

also since this is a definite integral so if I have sin^4 (x) I would find the value of sin(x) and take that to the power of 4 right?

final halo
#

Why do you need to do that?

pliant zephyr
#

well i didnt show it but its the definite integral from pi/2 and 0

final halo
#

Right so change your bounds according to your usub

#

And do the integral as you normally would but with u

pliant zephyr
#

for sure thanks

#

should i get into the habit of changing the bounds to my usub because what i typically do is just sub u with the original value so I can use the original bounds

final halo
#

As in, you replace u back with sin(x) at the end and use the original bounds?

pliant zephyr
#

yeah

#

i know it works but is it a bad habit or is it fine?

final halo
#

You can but you need to be careful in the intermediate steps

#

Something like this works

#

$\int_{x=0}^{x=\frac{\pi}{2}}u^3, \dd u$

flat frigateBOT
final halo
#

So people know which bounds are for which variable

pliant zephyr
#

ah ok should I do it like that cause I just typically dont write the bounds for the U steps until i change back

final halo
#

If you don't put "variable=bounds" ppl will assume its the bounds for the variable at the end of the integral

pliant zephyr
#

bet thanks

final halo
#

Good practice to do that yeah

#

Good stuff keep at it

pliant zephyr
#

thank you have a good night man

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @pliant zephyr

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

novel magnet
safe radishBOT
novel magnet
#

I’m kinda stuck after this step

#

Cuz

#

It keeps on repeating

lean otter
#

what is that

#

polynomial division?

novel magnet
#

Yes

lean otter
#

what are you dividing by

#

$1+ux$?

flat frigateBOT
#

jswatj

novel magnet
#

1 + 4x

lean otter
#

ohhh

#

I see

#

write it as $4x+1$

flat frigateBOT
#

jswatj

lean otter
#

and your goal should be to get $4x\rightarrow 12x$ not $1\rightarrow 12x$

flat frigateBOT
#

jswatj

novel magnet
#

Oh

#

So I divide 12x by 4x and not 1?

lean otter
#

yes

novel magnet
#

Wait how come.. this one video I watched he did the leftward digit first

safe radishBOT
#

@novel magnet Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @novel magnet

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

safe radishBOT
safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

solemn vault
#

Hi

safe radishBOT
solemn vault
#

Q.28 Is the sketch of the img correct??

safe radishBOT
#

@solemn vault Has your question been resolved?

solemn vault
#

<@&286206848099549185>

#

.cloa3

#

.clos3

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @solemn vault

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

unkempt solstice
#

Wtf bruh

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

eternal sparrow
#

Need help with solving log equations please?

rose swallow
#

Ok.

eternal sparrow
#

Here it is

foggy salmon
#

hustlers university is good

#

when u add logs of the same base, u can multiply what is inside aka
log a+log b=log ab

#

then from there take 6^ left and right side

balmy sky
#

wait

eternal sparrow
#

I’ll try

foggy salmon
#

yep now take 6^ left and right side

eternal sparrow
#

Like that?

foggy salmon
#

6^ is 6 to the power of

#

alternatively just take the definition of log

#

eg
log a(b)=c means
a^c=b

eternal sparrow
#

Is that correct?

#

@foggy salmon

foggy salmon
#

^ means to the power of, not multiply

#

it should be 6^2 not 6*2

foggy salmon
eternal sparrow
#

Ohhh wait I’ll fix it, sorry

safe radishBOT
#

@eternal sparrow Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @eternal sparrow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

eternal sparrow
foggy salmon
#

np

eternal sparrow
#

I really appreciate it

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

foggy salmon
#

yea seems right

lean otter
#

both?

safe radishBOT
#

@lean otter Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @rocky swallow

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

olive terrace
#

Hi everyone, quick question: what is the name of the rule/formula to get the 2nd equation?

hybrid ermine
#

its just factorization

olive terrace
hybrid ermine
#

Well you can write it that way, but you want to write the whole thing as a product of 2 factors

#

So you split the 2x as -3x + x

olive terrace
#

I'm not sure how you get -3x

safe radishBOT
#

@olive terrace Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

karmic coral
#

I have to prove the circled proposition by induction

#

Any tips ?

#

It’s easy when n = 0

foggy salmon
#

assume it is true for when it is k for some k in N

#

and try to use the statement u got from that to show that that would imply that Pk+1 is true as well

karmic coral
#

yeah that what I’m trying to do

#

how can I go from t^n+1 to t^n+2 in the integral ?

foggy salmon
#

so

#

wait sry whats the proposition

#

i cant really understand

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

inner urchin
#

ok so i got everything in therms of x and i got: x=lny, x= -(lny)/3 and x = ln5 i am having trouble as to where i go from here

inner urchin
#

here is the graph

safe radishBOT
#

@inner urchin Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#

@inner urchin Has your question been resolved?

inner urchin
#

close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @inner urchin

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

wind mason
#

.ask need to find a combination that equals 75

#

omg how i use this lmao

safe radishBOT
tame charm
#

Combination that equals 75? Wdym

wind mason
#

first 3 are the inputs, the coloumn farthest right is output

safe radishBOT
#

@wind mason Has your question been resolved?

cedar rover
#

it's unclear what you (or they) mean by "combination", but the three numbers of the input always give 58 if you sum them

wind mason
#

Input 1,2,3 = 75

#

The numbers I’ve posted is what I’ve tried

#

I can’t find the right combo to get to 75

safe radishBOT
#

@wind mason Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#

@wind mason Has your question been resolved?

wind mason
#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @wind mason

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

dire fjord
#

Hi

safe radishBOT
dire fjord
#

Why is x1 = a + delta x

fiery prawn
#

Each width is equidistant

#

i.e change in x

foggy salmon
#

they r saying a is kinda x0, x1 is y after x increases some interval, triangle x is the rate of change od y

dire fjord
#

I mean why is it a+ ndelta x

#

xn should probably be a+n delta x why is that

foggy salmon
#

oh wait the trangle is the delta x oops

#

no y's

dire fjord
#

Also why are we adding a

foggy salmon
#

they r just saying the width of one S is triangle x

dire fjord
#

a is the left endpoint of the interval [a;b]

#

That's exactly why they are adding a

#

Bc it's the left endpoint of the interval [a;b]

foggy salmon
#

sry im doing smt rn

dire fjord
#

It's ok np

#

Don't mind do what you are doing

#

Have a nice day in this time I'll be thinking about it

#

Ok now I understand the case for x1

#

x1 is a+delta x bc the right endpoint is x0+ width of the strip

#

Which is a+delta x

#

And that's also the case for x2,x3....xn

foggy salmon
#

wait so u kinda figured out ur question i guess?

dire fjord
#

Bc as we go from x1 to xn ,the width increases from delta x to ndeltax

dire fjord
#

I don't surrender to the question

#

I keep trying till I find a way to solve it

foggy salmon
#

this isn't exactly a question tho lol

dire fjord
#

I try to think in a different way if I see that the way of thinking I am using is useless here

#

Yea ik

#

It's not an exercise or something

#

It's an idea

#

But I should understand it to continue reading

#

Bc if I skip this without understanding this idea I may face problems later on

#

Anyways tysm for your time and have a nice day

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @dire fjord

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

cobalt bough
safe radishBOT
tranquil sentinel
#

Where are you stuck?

cobalt bough
#

b) Idk where to start

tranquil sentinel
#

Think about what it's asking: what are the values of x that make y=5x-x² bigger than y=4?

tranquil sentinel
cobalt bough
#

2

tranquil sentinel
#

It's not going to be a single value, but an interval

#

Try to look at the graph to find your answer. I which interval does the graph of y=5x-x² goes above the graph of y=4?

lean otter
cobalt bough
#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @cobalt bough

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

safe radishBOT
vast obsidian
#

<@&268886789983436800>

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

warped roost
#

.close

vast obsidian
#

Thanks

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lean otter
#

I actually have no idea how to go about this question?

lean otter
#

i can only guess that 16x^(2)+4x+1 is the answer because they are all perfect squares

#

or am i suppose to factor every equation before finding the answer?

#

it says incorrect

#

4 and 16 are also perfect squares so why isnt that the answer?

glass pivot
#

perfect square is when you can factorize and have (ax+b)^2

lean otter
#

wait is it saying the middle number must be 2ab

#

and a is 5 and b is 6

glass pivot
#

Because (ax+b)^2 = a^2x^2 + 2abx + b^2 when we expand

glass pivot
#

Ah yes sorry

lean otter
#

so to solve that i need to remember that equation

#

a^2x^2 + 2abx + c

#

and see which of the options fit that

glass pivot
#

Yes

worthy hemlock
flat frigateBOT
#

dldh06

lean otter
#

so it factor a perfect square trinomial i just convert it from the second to the first equation above?

#

(5x+6)^2?

glass pivot
#

Thanks dldh06 happy

worthy hemlock
#

What you need to do, for each answer choice, because you know it's a perfect square trinomial, you need to square root the a term and c term of each choice, then do 2ab, to find the middle term

#

So for example, 25x^2 + 60x + 36

#

What's the square root of a and c?

lean otter
#

5 6

worthy hemlock
#

So then what's 2ab?

lean otter
#

60

worthy hemlock
#

Is there multiple answers?

lean otter
#

no

#

i had another question here also

worthy hemlock
#

Then ask

lean otter
#

my teacher told me to factor a trinomial where a doesnt equal 1

#

then i have to find 2 numbers whose product is a times c and sum is b

#

do i apply that here to this equation to factor it

#

so 900 and 30 times 30

#

is 900 and 30 plus 30 is 60

#

i get (5x+6)^2

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @hidden robin

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

safe radishBOT
neat kiln
#

For first multiply it by π/180

#

And second 180/π

#

Yeah coz π radians is 180 degrees

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @raw crystal

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

safe radishBOT
hollow siren
#

Hello, This is messing with me. I don’t know how to start

safe radishBOT
#

@hollow siren Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed due to the original message being deleted

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

thick sphinx
#

Not sure if it is considered maths, but what exactly is the difference between the proposition form (rough translation from my language) and the boolean form in bool algebra?

thick sphinx
#

Let me know if its the wrong place to ask that

polar lynx
#

What do you mean by "proposition form" and "boolean form"?

#

@thick sphinx

thick sphinx
#

Erm hold on, I'll try to get examples

#

(A) A blue car
(B) Bill Gates is the president of the USA
(C) x * 4 => 25
(D) The nile river is the longest river in the world.

Rough translation of the question is something like:
Which one(s) are a proposition (or aren't), or a boolean form?

#

its... weird

polar lynx
#

Generally speaking a proposition can be true or false.

thick sphinx
#

yea, isnt that the same thing for bool?

polar lynx
#

I don't know what you mean by "boolean form"?

thick sphinx
#

hmmm

#

one sec

polar lynx
#

These things might end up depending on your specific definitions for "proposition form" and "boolean form" fwiw.

thick sphinx
#

Wait so

#

If we check the examples of earlier

#

x * 4 => 25

#

that cant be a proposition right?

#

because we dont know x? / can be both true or false

polar lynx
#

I'd say it depends on x. Like, if they mean x is a real number then x * 4 => 25 has to have some truth value, we just don't know what it is.

#

If not then it could mean anything so I'd say it doesn't have a truth value.

#

Whatever source you're using though should tell you via defns or examples whether they consider statements with variables in then to count as propositions I guess.

thick sphinx
#

Yeah, I'll ask the teacher next time I see him

#

Thanks though

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @thick sphinx

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

lean otter
#

how would i say "if x is smaller than r, y isnt a part of real numbers"

eager ravine
#

$$x < r \implies y \notin \mathbb R$$

flat frigateBOT
eager ravine
#

@lean otter

lean otter
eager ravine
#

maybe

keen jolt
#

can u help me too lenny

lean otter
lean otter
keen jolt
#

okay

lean otter
#

like what is x,r?

#

like sqrt(r-x) = y

#

??

#

if x is bigger than r its complex

#

you could say that

#

you could say either

#

but one is a statement the other is more of an equation

safe radishBOT
#

@lean otter Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @spice prism

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

muted imp
#

Let a, b be positive integers such that b^n+n is a multiple of a^n+n
for all positive integers n. Prove that a=b

inner tapir
#

is this true?

#

a = 1, b = 3, n = 1 holds...

#

i mean to say 3^1 + 1 is a multiple of 1^1 + 1, but clearly a ≠ b

safe radishBOT
#

@muted imp Has your question been resolved?

peak estuary
#

but it's not a multiple for every n. take n=2 and 3^2+2=11 is not a multiple of 1^2+2=3

inner tapir
#

🤦 of course mb

muted imp
#

I found this on the stackexchange, I just don't quite understand it

peak estuary
#

which part of it do you not understand

muted imp
#

Yes

peak estuary
#

not helpful

muted imp
#

Doesn't this demonstrate this is false?

peak estuary
#

no

#

because the statement says that a^n+n divides b^n+n for all n

muted imp
#

Ah I see

safe radishBOT
#

@muted imp Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#

@muted imp Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

vague light
#

Why is the ratio test usually used to find the radius of convergence?

stray socket
#

Quandale Dingle here. It's because the ratio test tests whether it converges absolutely, and within a certain domain because we have x, if that makes sense

#

Here

#

In mathematics, the radius of convergence of a power series is the radius of the largest disk at the center of the series in which the series converges. It is either a non-negative real number or

    ∞
  

{\displaystyle \infty }

. When it is positive, the power series converges absolutely and uniformly on com...

vague light
#

wikipedia is actually cracked out

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @vague light

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

river granite
#

For a linear regression to be a good estimator of the relationship between two variables, it needs to satisfy a few assumptions. One of these is linearity in the relationship. As far as I understand, this assumption can be satisfied even if the relationship is quadratic, like this:

river granite
#

$$y_{i}=\alpha +\beta_{1} x_{i}+\beta_{2} (x_{i}^{2})+\epsilon $$

flat frigateBOT
#

AlexanderJ

river granite
#

...because the linear model still 'sees' the variables linearly; the independent variables are still all only summing to create the dependent variable, and the model 'doesn't care' whether the term is actually "x squared."
(I got this from this StEx answer: https://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/92065/why-is-polynomial-regression-considered-a-special-case-of-multiple-linear-regres)

Another separate assumption is that variables aren't multicolinear. As an example: a video I'm watching is explaining that if the number of car/pedestrian accidents in a neighborhood Y depended on the number of people who live in the neighborhood X₁ and the number of cars that drive through the neighborhood X₂, then this would violate the assumption because X₂ is clearly affected by X₁.

But, if we can have a regression that features both x and in it, like the equation I wrote above, and it's a valid linear regression, then why doesn't featuring both x and in a regression break the "no multicolinearity" assumption?

safe radishBOT
#

@river granite Has your question been resolved?

river granite
#

<@&286206848099549185> ? 🙏

safe radishBOT
#

@river granite Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#

@river granite Has your question been resolved?

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed due to timeout

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

mossy remnant
#

Hello sorry for interrupting but I need help ;-;

lean chasm
#

• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.

mossy remnant
#

So how do I solve that question, because I need to get the common monomial factor.

#

I've tried searching how to solve it but end up getting the same answer but without the solution

safe radishBOT
#

@mossy remnant Has your question been resolved?

mossy remnant
chrome pasture
#

say .close when you’re finished 👍

safe radishBOT
#

@mossy remnant Has your question been resolved?

#
Channel closed

Closed by @mossy remnant

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

safe radishBOT
#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

warm cosmos
safe radishBOT
warm cosmos
#

please help me understand this

#

ik that the I is for the x value and the J is fot the y

#

but i get different answers when i use sin and cos

#

i got 28 for sin and 151 for cos

#

so idk what i did wrong

worthy hemlock
warm cosmos
#

its mostly on my calc

#

but ill put it on paper

#

you can plug in the values in your calc just to make sure

#

Do you see anything i did wrong

worthy hemlock
#

So I can't see anything wrong, but what I recall from problems like this you need to use tangent for the angle

warm cosmos
#

Ok lemme see what I get

#

I got negative 28

worthy hemlock
#

Well, next thing is, you know it's (-15, 8) meaning it's in the second quadrant, so you need to adjust the value of -28 to be in quad 2, by adding 180 or 360

warm cosmos
#

150 it is

#

so it would be either 1 or 2

#

and i would say 1 because x comes before the y coordinate

worthy hemlock
#

How would you know if cos comes before the sin?

warm cosmos
#

well the cosine function deals with the x coordinate while the sine function is with the y value and if we were to put that as a ordered pair it would be (x,y)

#

but idk

#

that just what i was thinking

worthy hemlock
#

Well, you can check that, because you are given 17<cos(151), sin(151)> so you can then do 17cos(151), 17sin(151)

warm cosmos
#

so it would be answer 1?

worthy hemlock
#

Did you check it?

warm cosmos
#

lemme see

#

i have to finish the other problems in the section to check it

#

but they are all the same just with different numbers

warm cosmos
#

it was right

#

i got wrong this question though

#

ohhh i see what i did wrong

#

i got 32

#

but since they were both negative

#

that menas it should of been on quadrant 3

#

ok anyways thank you

#

.close

safe radishBOT
#
Channel closed

Closed by @warm cosmos

Use .reopen if this was a mistake.

#
Available help channel!

Send your question here to claim the channel.

Remember:
Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!

Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.

stone nest