#help-19
1 messages · Page 221 of 1
Tips, manipulate the fraction so that the numerator no longer contains x
x?
you have to prove it via epsilon-delta?
Yep
But it doesnt click
The method
Its unorthodox to what ive learnt in highschool
so you must show that (\forall\epsilon>0,\exists N\in\mathbb{N}:n>N):
[\left|\frac{2n-3}{n+2}-2\right|<\epsilon]
apparently I suck at LaTeX 
PajamaMamaLlama
Whats that đ
"coding" language for math
So i have to get n alone?
Yup
That'll be the rank for a given epsilon
Beware that n is a natural number and not a real number
You just shown that for any epsilon > 0 there exist n in N such that |u_n - 2| < epsilon which is the definition of u_n tends to 2
anubhav bro kat jaoge mit jaoge
bumboclat
Its done?
Pretty much yeah
Not meant to be hard
@main cape Has your question been resolved?
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone help me with this?
do you know
properties and laws of log
not that much
Its basic
wait
i think i get it
what exponent do i give to the base? to match the number of the yk
yep
0?
sorry mistype
yeah thatâs the answer
what do you raise to 5 in order for it to become (5)^2
2
correct
and number 3 is 0?
exponent of 1
yes
so every time you see a logarithm
phrase this question in your head
âwhat do I raise to (small number in the bottom) in order for it to become (big number on the right most)?â
thank broo
yeah do you get it?
also i just wanna ask a clarifying questuob
yes
whats your question
not related to this
if its addition its just putting them next to each other
and if - is always using the deision
idk i think its a typo or something
thanks for the help dude
im okay now
.close
Closed by @vocal willow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can we prove this using the defintion
C'est quoi la définition de la limite que tu as ?
pour tou epsilon posi. il existe alpha posi. tel que 0<|x-a|<alpha implique |fx-l|< epsilon
Tu connais la notion de voisinage ?
non
mmm je connais "au voisinage" de quelque chose cad de l'approcher
comment on peut dire well en frc?
Un voisinage d'un point c'est un intervalle autour de ce point oui
Bien ?
ah oui
donc je la connais
masi ca sert a quoi?
A rendre les choses un peu plus simple mais comme il demande la définition de la limite on va faire avec la definition
je ne vois pas ou on faut commencais
L'Ă©crire pour (f â g)(x) -> l
f est continue ?
Ok
c'est trop dur đ
Oui ducoup
Non, faut juste pas se perdre dans toutes les écritures mais sinon c'est comme des lego les définitions vont s'embriquer les unes dans les autres
je pense que j'aura labandonner
oui moi suassi je la trouver facile on thoery mais je suis perdu dans tous les ecritures comme vous avez dire
@exotic oracle Has your question been resolved?
This is false as written (assuming I understood what it's asking). You need an extra condition to make it work. For example, if f(x) = 0 for all x, and g(x) = 7 when x=0 and g(x)=13 when x=/=0, then lim_(x -> 0) f(x) = 0 and lim_(y -> 0) g(y) = 13, but lim_(x -> 0) g(f(x)) = lim_(x->0) g(0) = 7.
(One such condition would be that f(x) =/= b in some neighborhood of a.)
It's usually true
But not always
Because of how limits don't say anything about the value of the function at the actual point
No, but I can try to understand anyways
Yeah so the fluff isn't enough to solve the issue
how so
Did you see this example I gave^
yeah
It'll come up in the proof when you need to show that 0 < |f(x) - b| < delta but you'll only know that |f(x) - b| < delta
no? we have to prove that if 0<|x-a|<alpha then f(x)-b|< epsilon
or am i missing something
You'll see when you write the proof
ive been trying for hours man
i swear
You already wrote the definition of a limit, so this is what it says for f and g (choosing different letters for each to hopefully make things less confusing when we combine them):
- For every epsilon' > 0, there exists alpha > 0 such that 0 < |x-a| < alpha implies |f(x)-b| < epsilon'
- For every epsilon > 0, there exists beta > 0 such that 0 < |y-b| < beta implies |g(y)-l| < epsilon
Does that make sense?
i dont think we need different epsilons?
yeah i got there
It doesn't need to be different, but you're allowed to choose a different letter and it can help if we want to set one of them to a specific value
wait
epsilon is a value that very close to zero right?
do i remeber that correctly?
Epsilon isn't a specific number, but the idea is that if it's true for every epsilon > 0 then it's true for epsilon as small as you want.
ok i understand
What we want to prove is that
- For every epsilon > 0, there exists alpha > 0 such that 0 < |x-a| < alpha implies |g(f(x))-l| < epsilon
yeah
So when we need to prove a "for all"/"for every" we use "let". So the first line of the proof is going to be "Let epsilon > 0."
We need to eventually get to |g(f(x)) - l| < epsilon, yeah?
So it makes sense to use the second bullet point here, since it says the same thing if you pick y=f(x)
and we have |f(x)-b|< epslon
Well what we know is
For every epsilon' > 0, there exists alpha > 0 such that 0 < |x-a| < alpha implies |f(x)-b| < epsilon'
We can choose epsilon' to be whatever we want, it doesn't have to be epsilon
(this is why I chose to use a different name here)
What should we choose epsilon' to be, do you think?
beta?
yep!
but thats way too obvious no?
it is the obvious choice, yes, but that's what the other person meant by saying it's like lego
The difficulty in this proof is getting used to working with these sorts of definitions and proofs, not the content itself
quantifiers, especially
thanks @gleaming turtle and @sand horizon
And one last thing
yeah ill practice more
yeah
But you need 0 < |f(x) - b| < beta
i get it now
cant we work around that?
You'll need an extra condition like f(x) =/= b for all x in I or that g is continuous. Otherwise the f and g I gave you earlier are a counterexample
question; why would it being continous change anything?
If g is continuous then l=g(b) so you'll get |g(f(x)) - l| = 0 when f(x)=b
So you can deal with that case separately
@exotic oracle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @exotic oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this two-part answer. I tried to put this answer I got in different ways, and it keeps saying it is wrong
you gotta wait a tincy bit longer before ping helpers my friend đ (4 min)
Nah itâs good.
im having a massive shit rn
anyways bottom area is (M-4x)(M-2x)
ts an open box so you just take the volume and minus the roof
So how do i find my part b, im so confused
Because for c i know the graph is the first one is correct
i think the diagram is a bit confusing the box dimensions should be:
h: x w: 32-4x l: 32-2x
ok so if you got V(x) you reduce it to like
a quadratic or something
and find its minmax
cuz of the locking tabs
Use his formula for the bottom area and you'll see where it goes to zero
Okay there's another part for this i'm about to take the picture
for the X
find x in v(x) = max
Ok, do you know derivatives? Or are you supposed to lol?
I don't know tbh I take online course of math in college and this what i'm assigned
The second picture and the first picture are the same picture just broken apart
Wait
Is x=4?
i had 5.3 before
This part right here i can't seem to get the right answer
is B [0,16] instead of (0,16) or am i wrong?
ok, you could derivate the function obtained by multiplying the terms of V(x). Since you don't know derivatives I think you can just look at the graph
sorry for the delay btw
try to see for what X the curve has the largest result
can you reply to what image your telling me about so i don't get lost
For b consider the formula for the volume (32-4x)(32-2x)x. The upper limit is not 16, because there is a lower x that anything higher than it would output a negative volume
Oh okay thatâs interesting
btw I'm trying to not give straight up answers cause I figured you might prefer that
Iâm deadass so confused and lost im trying to get it done before it closes at 11;59, like your giving me the step by step process but this is imo really hard to understand
I think all of the graphs have the peak at about the same x. What course is this for?
MATH 175 pre-calculus
The correct graph is the top left one
I got that part correct
I just needed the A) and B) part because Iâm confused and keep getting it incorrect
Ok, I'm sorry for this. In that new formula, because of the (32-4x), anything for x higher than 8 will output a negative volume, which is wrong. So the limit is (0,8), they don't include 0 and 8 because with those numbers the volume would be zero
gotcha
Iâm a chemistry major sorry if I sound dumb for my major, math is really hard for me
Okay see now that makes sense
Did you get the new formula for the volume? It was (32 - 2x)(32 - 4x)x
Yeah I got that correct eneded up figuring that out
I didnât figure the (0,8) on my own though
No problem at all. I'm here to help! Sorry if I sound unfriendly, english is not my main language and I'm trying to be effective in my communication here
great!
No you sound perfectly fine I donât get offended easily, unless you were to just say âyouâre dumb.â Your being nice and calm and understand I really do appreciate it
Thank you so much @sly yoke and @outer hinge
You're welcome! Did you get everything you needed?
Closed by @stiff finch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hm dumb question but did I mess up here?
I got y right
so I tried clearing for x, and Im stuck at the blue part
I know that the answer is the red solution
how can I get there from that fraction?
honestly I mustve messed up somewhere, just cant tell where
@sinful cave Has your question been resolved?
just noticed I messed up the sign
specifically, I multiplied y by r, and forgot the sign when moving it to the other side
.close
Closed by @sinful cave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why does this require the map to be invertable? is surjectivity not enough?
the point is that by proving injectivity we can then prove surjectivity (because both are equivalent to invertibility when dimensions are the same)
@remote cloud Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @remote cloud
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
â
@forest sky I get that but i dont understand how having the map be invertable proves this
because if you have a linear map T from V to W with dim(V) = dim(W) then T injective iff T invertible iff T surjective
so we prove injectivity and that implies surjectivity
No, like
I dont understand how the exsistance of such a polynomial is proven with the map being invertable
"for all q, there exists a polynomial p such that Tp = q" is just stating the defn of surjectivity for that map
Ok, so if we only proved surjectivity would this work?
why does it also need to be injective?
are we using injevtivity to prove surjetivity
to show that a solution exsists
yes, that is what we are doing
ok so the main condition we need is surjectivity, not invertability
but because they have the same dimention, we can use injectivity to imply surjectivity which is what we need
it's reasoning in the form
"T is injective, T is surjective iff it is injective, therefore T is surjective"
the fact that its invertable isnt really needed it for this
ok, this came right after the definition about invertablility so i was curious
So, suppose we proved that its surjective
would that be enough?
yes so there's a bunch of thing equivalent to a linear map being invertible (including injective and surjective). this is an example of where one of those equivalencies can be usedul
sure, but that's what we're doing here. just in a more roundabout way because injectivity is easier
ah ok that makes snese
sence
sasjlf
so what is important is, if u cant prove surjectivity right away
and the dimentions of the domain and co domain line up
you can prove injectivity?
yes, and more generally if you want to prove one of the statements equivalent to invertibility but another one is easier to prove, just prove whichever is easiest and then the thing you want to prove follows
here is a list of two dozen such equivalencies, which you build up over the course of a linear algebra class:
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/InvertibleMatrixTheorem.html
The invertible matrix theorem is a theorem in linear algebra which gives a series of equivalent conditions for an nĂn square matrix A to have an inverse. In particular, A is invertible if and only if any (and hence, all) of the following hold: 1. A is row-equivalent to the nĂn identity matrix I_n. 2. A has n pivot positions. 3. The equation...
Ok cool, so for same dimention its jsut a chain
Like
Is invertable $\iff$ is injective $\iff$ is surjective
BOSS
and then we use either one to prove the other two in cases its needed.
yes
alternatively if you prove any of them is false then all the others are also false
so invertable maps are only between two codomains of the same size
a map can only possibly be invertible if the domain and codomain have the same dimension, yes
Also, is an isomorphism just an invertable function which is a bijective function
like are they not all the same definition?
an isomorphism is a bit more specific because it also has to "preserve the structure" of the spaces in question
in linear algebra "preserves the structure" means being linear. so an isomorphism is a bijective linear map
Also, is an isomorphism just an invertable linear map which is a bijective linear map ***
Ok yeah, and the last two are also the same
why do we sometiomes say isomophism and other times say invertable linear map
its just he same thing right/
they mean the same thing in the context of vector spacs
in linear algebra there are a bunch of terms which are basically equivalent
so pick your favorite
sometimes you want to emphasize different things
like that the two vector spaces are isomorphic
w ok
Ok, i just wanted to make sure im not going crazy in thinking all these definitions mean the same thing
there are other kinds of isomorphisms, like group isomorphisms and ring isomorphisms, but they donât come up in linear algebra
in group theory i remember there was more to an isomphism
yeah
I did those before this class and i dont remember those things being the exact same
alr tyty
.close
Closed by @remote cloud
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
â
well there is only one vector space of each dimension up to isomorphism
which might leave out a bunch of information that isn't part of the vector space structure
but as far as the vector space structure goes (taking linear combinations etc) they are the same
this is actually very useful because it means every problem about finite dimensional vector spaces and linear transformations can be reduced to a problem about F^n and matrices
Wild okm
thats really cool
so again like cyclic groups or the mod groups in group theory
(because you can always choose a basis)
but some vector spaces donât have a ânaturalâ basis
yeah it's all completely basis dependent
$F^2$
BOSS
so that means like
like the subspace ${(x, y, z) \in F^3: x+y+z=0}$
soup_norm
$\mathcal{P}_n(F) \cong F^{(n+1)}$
BOSS
indeed
ok cool its starting to make mroe sense
they are not exactly the same tho
they just have the same structure
they have the same structure as vector spaces
so i would have to define a map
and then i can do all my work in F^n
but at the end i would have to bring it back to the origninal vector space
yes, thatâs what you can do if you only care about the vector space structure
yes
well the canonical map will be the map where you map each basis vector to the corresponding basis vector of the other space
this of course requires you to pick bases of each space in the first place
ok wait going back to a previous lemma
There is one that states there is always a map from the basis of some vector to the same number of elements in another vector
Can i choose these vectors?
(this is only canonical once youâve got a basis)
or is it just given by the lemma
same number of elements? what do you mean?
let me find it
you can choose them, yes
you can choose to map the basis vectors of the domain to any vectors in the codomain. once you do that then the output for every other vector in the domain is fixed though
which vectors do you want to choose?
remember it canât be surjective if V has a strictly smaller dimension than W
then its an isomorphism right?
if we choose the list of w's to be a basis then we get an isomorphism, yes
^
ok cool
i was just going to use that to prove the theorem lol
Like if we have two maps, of the same dim, i can just map them togetehr
and thats an isomorphism
for this
hello
yes so that proves the backward direction
@remote cloud Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think you could apply distance constant approach
yeah
try useing 3/4(V)(t+35/60) = vt ?
d-50/3S/4
yeah but i am not getting the answer
i did
$$
\frac{D-50}{3S/4} = t + 35
$$
and
$$
\frac{D-74}{3\frac{S}{4}} = t +
15
are these correct?
Rabbit
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
hmm yes
I guess its a calculation error
i changed 35 into hour too
is ti 24?
so what you want to do is take the difference in time b/w the two cases which is 1/3rd hour
(\mathbf{V}): Normal speed (\Delta t=(35-15)\text{\ min}=20\text{\ min}=\frac{1}{3}\text{\ h})
$$
\frac{24}{\frac{3}{4}\mathbf{V}}-\frac{24}{\mathbf{V}}=\frac{1}{3}
$$
$$
\frac{32}{\mathbf{V}}-\frac{24}{\mathbf{V}}=\frac{1}{3}
$$
$$
\frac{8}{\mathbf{V}}=\frac{1}{3}
$$
$$
\mathbf{V}=8\times 3
$$
$$
\mathbf{V}=24
$$
qfalcon_
where didyou get 24?
24 is the distacne extra
@torn tulip Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @torn tulip
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rccw
Worthless piece of shit bot
When using BIDMAS does the indices outside the bracket apply before the 5 on the outside
Yes indices first
Ok
The 5 on the outside is a multiplication
.close
Closed by @pale bison
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help with question 12 d
are you allowed to use calculus?
if yes, derivatives kill this problem in one shot
if not, find the vertex of the function h(t)
Closed by @pale bison
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find every shape that's have a special name and prove it why
âŠwhat
No thanks
10 robux
Best wishes though
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
In case that makes it slightly better
this looks like an architect's fever dream, and I agree that the original question would be interesting to see
@left quarry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Oh
You'll have to claim another channel
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is my h'(y) = 0?
Also this is solving an ODE that started off as not exact but using a method to make it so and to solve using that.
@sand matrix Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anybody have any tricks on how to find domain and range of equations ? Iâm very bad at this and always feel like Iâm just guessing if itâs not just X cannot equal somthing or if itâs a root 3 equation
There isn't a universal trick for domain & range. Domain can be fairly easy by just remembering the domains of common discontinous functions (ie. sqrtx, lnx, rationals, etc.)
@cursive sigil Has your question been resolved?
For the root of three is the domain and range always ( negative infinity , infinity ) ?
Stitches
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Nope
Just write down the function in terms of both the dependent variable and independent variable: y = ... and x = ...
Then, see what shouldn't fit, like checking for division by zero or negative inside root, etc.
This should suffice for most.
ghi tiáșżng viá»t Äi e rá»i Äá» ngưá»i ta dá»ch ra t.a
@left quarry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello guys đ
I am trying to learn dsa and am kinda stuck on the maths part
I want to take some time and try to learn some maths so it would become easier
Any good books/resources on number theory and combinatorics would be grateful đ
Thanks in advance đ
.close
Closed by @empty dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Thank you ver muchđ
.close
Closed by @empty dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anyone have any ideas on how to do number 5a?
have you done limits of rational functions before
yes
ok, what do you usually do with these?
if we r talking about finding the limits of rational function i will just substitute x into the function and see if its 0/0 or inf/inf
or any other intermediate form
if it is then i will do L'hopital next.
If it isnt then either i have the answer or it does not exist.
its case by case tho if it can cancel each other out i will cancel it out first
i mean if all you know is l'hĂŽpital then i guess you need to l'hĂŽpital.
there are better ways for rational functions tho
i dont have a shed of experience on how to use mean thingy tho
mean thingy?
the question doesnt say to use MVT...
but never used it before
and it isnt applicable here either
we r talking about 5a right?
@wooden python
mmm ima just to do this tmrw ig
its fairly late for me
appreciate ur help tho
.close
Closed by @somber remnant
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
hlgjsADK:G
fuck
sorry
i was looking at the wrong thing the entire time im so sorry.
i had my eyes on 6a the entire time
sorry
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is the motivation/visualisation behind these
@lavish mesa Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lavish mesa
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
- What makes a differential equation linear
- What makes a differential equation homogeneous
- Why do we care about whether a function has constant coefficients
- Why are questions 1-3 important for solving a differential equation?
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
what have you tried, what do you know, etc etc
- you can superpose solutions and apply linear algebra things
- dy/dx = F(x,y) where F(tx,ty) = t^nF(x,y) (F is homogenous of degree n so)
- in DE ? Not the same methods when its not
- to solve it tbh
In this section give an in depth discussion on the process used to solve homogeneous, linear, second order differential equations, ay'' + by' + cy = 0. We derive the characteristic polynomial and discuss how the Principle of Superposition is used to get the general solution.
@vernal ibex Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
brandon
If youâre in a city with a university or college, then you could just go to the library. They should have some resources. This should also be free
(Are you from Germany? Where did you find this problem?)
Ah ok. Bc this was a problem from the BWM (Bundeswettbewerb Mathematik) and I tried (and failed) it
Maybe also Archive?
Yeah⊠next year maybe?
Or you could try the books from springer. They have a lot
A thatâs unfortunate. Yes it is
Aber bist du denn in einer Uni Stadt. Weil dort gibt es das fr alles. (Habe mal in einer normalen Bibliothek geschaut, da war die Ausbeute sehr mauâŠ)
Yes there actually is a video from DorFuchs about it. Itâs quite understandable. After that it seemed pretty easy
Nah, das natĂŒrlich blöd. Manchmal kann man bei denen einen Account machen und dann online ausleihen
Also one of my friends has a solution if you just want a latex pdf
Jaa, das sollte auch lange reichen. Ich hatte das halt mal probiert und bin nach 30 Seiten abgestorben. Man muss halt echt alles noch mal selbst durchdenken und die Aufgaben sind auch schwer. Davor hĂ€lt das Buch dann aber auch langeâŠ
Aber ich bin auch nicht so alt wie du (auĂer du hast Klassen ĂŒbersprungen) also kann es bei dir ja auch ganz anders sein
Ja das war zweite Runde. Also die anderen habe ich gemacht (hoffentlich richtig, dann AIMO). Die gingen eigentlich. Ich saĂ nur leider sehr lange an 1a), weil mir der richtige Ansatz fehlte. Man musste das alles mit Latex schreiben, also wenn du was haben willst kann ich es gerne schicken
Ja, 3 war am einfachsten tatsÀchlich
Wait a sec
Ups, habe mich gedoxt...
Closed by @upper pebble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help me with simultaneous equations, ive soent a week trying to understand them and its so hard too
do you have a specific problem/question
I mean not really but let me find a example
do one problem correctly first
What do you mean
i mean do one problem before doing a lot of them
Alright
@mystic saffron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why cant this be simplified to 13/29
$$\frac{1 + 3}{2+3} \ne \frac 3 3$$
gfauxpas
wouldnt u do $$\frac{1+3}{2+3} = \frac{1}{2}$$
vfx
that's not true either
Closed by @torn sonnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Okay so this all makes sense, but how did width go from 20->16 cm??? Like I get it cannot be 20cm cause 28-20(2) is negative and volume cannot have a negative dimension but still
Why the number 16
Like length and height both were
-2(4) and then the equation was gotten for them
But why those ones and not height? Is it because height is only reflected of x in the equation while they were
-2(x)
its just 28-12 no?
since x is 6
the width being 20 is the x=4 case
the notation on the left makes me sad though, should be 0 rather than V(x)
and the V(4)
now I wont be able to sleep in peace
@split olive Has your question been resolved?
What so we plug in x because each is equal to l - 2x?
Or w -2x?
they did two cases
x=4 and x=6 since x=20 wasnt acceptable
then they just used w=28-2x and l=32-2x
for each one
Okay but why would the factor be used
Like for two different dimensions
Is it cause it gives us the value of x? The value of x could be 6 though no?
I think I don't understand the context of this honestly
I get it's volume and the different dimensions
but why did we use x -4? It was the factor that led to the rest of the values?
x here is the height
they then wrote the length and width in terms of x
and then wrote V in terms of x by V= lwh
then they set V=1920 and solved for x
it was always going to factor into 4(x-4)(x-6)(x-20)=0
though how they got 4 simply is a mystery, you could try the rational root theorem or guessing, whichever floats your boat
Oh I did
But I'm saying why did we then do 32 -2x and make x = 4
For this
Why didn't we plug in x = 6
Or another one
I think I'm tripping
x=4 and x=6 are both valid heights, since they give us the volume we wanted
thats why we were solving V=1920 in terms of x
we only excluded x=20 because it wouldnt make physical sense
mathematically, it would also be a solution
thats why at the bottom they have two sets of h, w and l
one for x=4 and the other for x=6
So to equal the volume it has to be subtracted by 4 because the factor of the height is less
confusion
OKay so it's 1920 = (x-4)(32-2x)(28-2x)
no
1920=x(32-2x)(28-2x)
we arent just choosing x-6 and x-4 arbitrarily
they were things we got by solving this
Oh
But x = 4 or 6 right? So the x we put into that equation will also change the value for the other two factors
yeah
theyre both possible solutions
so you have to state both
LIke can I just choose 6 instead and use that dimensions
Why did my teacher only do one?
they state the x=4 solutions
then the x=6 solutions
Maybe she just wanted to?
they did both
Oh
OHHHH
Wait
Oh
Dude I thought she used the left side
and the final was the right
I didn't know how everything changed
aha, no, different cases
always state em all
no worries
.close
Closed by @split olive
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is the third one's dericative not 3?
so far i know option 1 and 4 are correct, but am confused about the third
f(2)=-1
f'(2)=3
how does one find the derv of the third?
Maybe u forgot the chain rule for sin(Ïx)?
yea
@cloud galleon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cloud galleon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in CRT, what if the left-hand side does not have an x but something like, say, 3x (and different values for each expression)? how do we solve the system, then?
if 3 does not divide the modulus, you can multiply by 3's inverse
if 3 does divide the modulus, you divide by 3
cases like 3x=2(mod 6) would be considered no solutions
yes
Closed by @near swan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
[repost because i have forgottten how we did this] how do we calculate these again?
Yes
But ig using eulerâs is easy
we find phi(43) and then do 1819 ^ (phi(43)) ⥠1 (mod 43)?
Yeah the only problem with euler is that the power is too small
So ig crt is the only way here
Closed by @near swan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm out of idea after writing out
f(x) = 3x for x>0
f(x) = x for x<0
Maybe you forgot abt the f(x+3) = f(x) part?
ya, because I don't really know how to deal with it
if f(x + T) = f(x)
the T is called the period of f(x)
period? like function of sin cos?
sin and cos are famous for being periodic yes
anyway
graph y = x for -1 †x †0 and then y = 3x for 0 < x < 2
show us the result
.
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
this means that the graph starts to repeat after that
so what you draw between -1 to 2
just copy paste that everywhere
yes like that
ok, so I repeat until it reach [-4, 5]
and I just calculate the y value and find the range
.close
Closed by @pearl prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if 3 naturals a,b,c are in AP and a+b+c=21, find the number of ordered triplets of a,b,c?
so i reduced it solving $x+y=6$ for $x,y \geq 0$
rakÂłen
ok
first set $a=x,b=x+y,c=x+2y$ to reduce it to $x+y=7$ such that $x \geq 1, y \geq 0$ and then replace $x$ by $x'+1$ so that $x' \geq 0$
rakÂłen
you dont know that y > 0
decreasing APs are still APs
okay cant come up with one but yeah
yes
set a,b,c = 7-d,7,7+d?
so i have 15 choices for d ic ic
wait wtf the answer key says 13?
oh okay so d cant be 7 or -7
right so 13
thx
.close
Closed by @toxic rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, can I ask a question here?
yes. you've already claimed this channel just by posting in it
post your question
Oh, thank you
in the future you can (& should) simply post your question from the get go.
You can still post the question here lol
it's ok
But if you're done, you close it by typing .close
.close to close the channel
.close
Closed by @south shore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thank you
If you ask questions in the future, just post them directly to the channel!
ok
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question.
Let d_n := { 2n, if n is prime; n, otherwise } (and take d_1 = 1). For nââ define
I_n := â«0^1 x^{x/d_n},dx,
where x^{x/d_n} at x=0 is taken by continuous extension (value 1). Evaluate
L := lim{nââ} n(1 â I_n).
Give a complete, rigorous proof.
can anyone help?
maybe
Can anyone help?...
Will u?
I'm out of my league here but if no one else comes along in 15 minutes you can ping Helpers as the Bot said
Alr thanks
looking at $J_n := \int_0^1 x^{x/n} \dd{x}$ seems like a good idea
Ann
Closed by @dim bramble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone teach me how to find out square and cube roots quickly plz.
in what context?
wdym ?
for fun? in an exam? with or without a calculator?
of any positive number or just square numbers?
and just for fun, right?
Well you could memorize the cubes and squares â probably start with those so you could recognize certain roots.
thereâs a numerical square root extraction method somewhere on internet, maybe wikipedia, let me try to find it (though it only gives approximate solutions)
no like if i need to solve a question with square or cube roots
school wont give such easy questions
generally they wonât ask you to evaluate the square root without a calculator, right?
If youâre dealing with roots that will result in irrational answers, there are probably strategies littered all over YouTube and wiki.
man im indian so unfortunately, no calc for me
yea but like there are too many so i like wanted to ask someone which is the best
Well do you know exactly whatâs going to be on your assignment? Ex: radical simplification, rearrangement, blah blah blah
can you send an example of a question where you need to calculate the square root of a given positive number?
usually there are other methods to get the answer that arenât as tedious
man im in 9th this kinda shi has'nt been tought to us
đ€
well tbh i didnt have any in mind i wanted to know a trick or smth to help me in the future
im sry is this was kinda an irrelevant question
you can try some of these methods https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_root_algorithms but usually they shouldnât be necessary
Square root algorithms compute the non-negative square root
S
{\displaystyle {\sqrt {S}}}
of a positive real number
S
âŠ
itâs a reasonable question, donât worry
I feel like it would at this point.
like usually you can do other (and more exact) things to get the answer
Rad. Simplification is pretty much taught right after you learn radicals no? 
nah only like the radical sign thingy
Interesting.
Well do you know exactly whatâs going to be on your assignment?
Could you still possibly answer this question?
if youâre doing these algorithms, you could memorize the squares of the natural numbers up to 30 or 32 (since sqrt(1000) is 31.6âŠ)
that might help
well ok then, thanks @lofty spade , @stoic cloud
@mellow cape Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mellow cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A is a set of cardinality $n$. What is the number of ways of choosing two subsets of A such that they have exactly 2 common elements?
rakÂłen
What have you tried
are the subsets allowed to be any size
ok and what then
i will say i have a much more elegant way in mind but continue yours
then the number of ways of choosing p and q $= \binom{n}{2} \sum_{0 \leq a,b \leq n-2} \binom{n-2}{a} \binom{n-2}{b}$
rakÂłen
does that give nc2 * 3^(n-2) as the answer
it does
and you can arrive at that much easier
first pick which 2 of A's n elements go in P \cap Q
then for each of the other n-2 elements independently of the others
you have 3 choices: go in P only, go in Q only, or go in neither
yes i found that on the web
question is this correct?
it uhhh doesnt look that way
but it's also a very â ïž way of doing it even if it is correct
what do u think am missing
indeed
@wooden python ?
what.
sorry i cant rly indulge you on this extremely complicated and needlessly difficult solution strategy
đ
I agree with Ann that this is needlessly complicated, but once u choose the 2 common elements, that sum is supposed to count the number of ways you can form 2 disjoint subsets out of n-2 elements, right?
If you wanna suffer less, try finding a different way to count that 2nd part (counting n.o. ways in which u can form 2 disjoint subsets of n-2 elements)
already done lol i am trying to suffer more for no reason
yes, i hope
oh, well
enjoy your suffering
it actually doesnt even look correct, shouldnt it be (n-2)Ca * (n-2-a)Cb
i wrote that initially but thought it was wrong
oh wait
yes
and it still overcounts
but why..?
you can choose the same subset with a = 7 and b = 3 and with b = 7 and a = 3 e.g.
it will be counted in both
wait those are the same?
.close
Closed by @toxic rose
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why du/dÏ = 0?
t-u = Ï <=> u= t- Ï => du/dÏ = -1?
i think you mean v and not ypsilon there btw
there is no v
this is ypsilon
Ann
how is that v
$v \upsilon$
Ann
ypsilon is wider
v is v wdym
but also i dont remember ever seeing lowercase ypsilon as a variable name anywhere in math
i havent seen in any text v be written like that
$\mathrm{v} v \mathbf{v}$
Ann
idk what to tell you, this is what v looks like in the LaTeX font.
why is the derivative 0 and not -1 like i showed here
anyway uhhhh
yeah ngl i got nothing either
it is mighty confusing wtf they're trying to achieve here
i looked over your pic 5 times yet cannot figure out why âu/âv is supposed to be 0
this is the integral
and we set t= u + v
the jacobian should be 2 from my calculations
over the region Ruv
oh wait actually maybe ik
@wooden python i see why its 0 we cant do the u= t-v because in the jacobian we transform each variable and u stays the same its not dependant on v
its u=u , t= u-v
the transformation
.close
Closed by @manic grail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
âą Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
âą Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
âą After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
âą Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
âą Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
To start $Y(\omega) = e^{X(\omega)} \forall x \in \Omega$, where $\Omega$ is the sample spae and $\omega \in \Omega$
wai
$P(Y(\omega)) = P(e^{X(\omega)})$
wai
the issue is working with the right hand side now
probabilities of single numbers for continuous distributions are always zero
so thats not the correct thing to look at
so a subset of the sample sapce instead
well I see two options
either you have the transformation formula for PDF's
then you just plug in
a different option would be to find the CDF of Y first and differentiate that
and there are surely also other options
wai
log-normal distribution đ„°
so I need to integrate over $\frac{1}{â{2Ï}} e^{-x^2/2}â€y$
yes but you dont need to actually compute the integral
wai
nvm
hmm?
you should never ever have the expression for the density in such an inequality
you want to rewrite P(e^X <= y) to something of the form P(X <= something) so that you can write this as integral_-infty^something (density of X)
<@&268886789983436800>
so I want Xâ€ln(y)
So what does the CDF look like
Let $A={x \mid \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}e^{-x^2/2}}}$.
\ $\int_{A} N(0,1)$
wai
forget this. thats needed for more difficult situations. not here
What
so I use the other method you described?
this
its the same as this. but at a slightly lower level of formality
this set A_y only seems to confuse you
wai
and now I differentiate this
yes
that would give me $\frac{1}{y} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2Ï}} e^{-(\ln(y))^2}/2}$
wai
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Yes