#help-19
1 messages · Page 216 of 1
Closed by @versed siren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
@short terrace @quasi falcon thank you for oyur help
again, theres probably an easier geometric method, but im not a greek philosopher to know what that would be
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
Even if you answer (1), tell us everything you know about the problem. Do you know what an intersection and union is? Lacking that, do you at least know what M and V represent?
literally nothing
not even what the variables represent
You don't know what M = {-1, 2, 5} means?
no, it's a set
Do you know what a set is?
read the first page then get back to us
https://www.math.uh.edu/~dlabate/settheory_Ashlock.pdf
aaalright
alright
got a general idea
So now, can you define a set in your own words?
a group of numbers defined as one?
(M contains -1, 2 and 5, and no other things)
would the variables be called sets?
no, the things that go into a set are called its elements.
thank you
I mean the letters
In this case M abd V
and*
The things in a set are "elements", the M is just a "set"
M and N? yeah. these are the names of those sets
So the set called "M" has elements -1, 2, 5.
and V has -1, 1, 3 and 7
Read definition 2.5 and 2.7 now.
on it
(example 2.3 & 2.4 are useful here too)
2.5 was confusing
in one the middle was shaded
but in the other everything was shaded
so in the first is it only similarities and the second is everything?
Did you read definition 2.5?
in this case -1
lemme look
ok ok I see
I defined it correctly
upside down u is the collection of sets
so what they both have
and normal u is what they don’t have
is that right or do I got it flip flopped
upside down u, the intersection is correct
Thats union
the intersection of two sets, $A \cap B$ is the set of all elements in both A and B
Stitches
A set including elements of both the sets
Intersection yes
do I just say { -1 upside down u -1 }?
hence it is in the intersection
No
no, you just say $M \cap V = {-1}$
Stitches
ohhh
A upside down u B={-1}
with curly brackets {-1}
Yes
the intersection of two sets is a set itself, so you need the curly brackets
okay and what does upside down u do again
The common elements
can you do this please
but for other
I meant upside
sorry impulse
Like U
not inverse
Union
Set including elements of both the sets
read def 2.7 and try to understand it yourself
I thought that was an intersection
Intersection is only the common elements
then get back to us
\{-1\}
common doesnt equal same elements?
It does
im lost
Eh maybe I am complicating things
youre getting caught up in terminology, read 2.7 and you can come up with terminology you're comfortable with
alright
okay so
Is it like functions?
where you don’t have to reiterate it it’s the same number
{ -1, 2, 3, 5, 7}
for the union
yes exactly
$M \cup V = {-1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 7}$
You missed one
yeah, just dont forget the curly bracket
whuch
only one I missed is the other -1
do I need to write it twice?
Stitches
you missed a positive 1
So, in one sentence each, with no math words, explain what the intersection and union of two sets are.
The intersection of two sets is when the sets have matching numbers. The union of two sets is when you compile all the numbers present in both sets
exactly
yay!!
can we do some example problems
btw normal U is compiled and upside down is similar right
Wdym compiled and similar
all the numbers present in both sets for normal U and just the same in both sets for upside down
yep
what happens when theres nothing in common for upside down
A set can have nothing in it. It's called the empty set (2.1). If there is nothing in common for the intersection, $U \cap V = {}$ simply
got it
Stitches
(or the O marked through symbol, same thing)
Basically both mean that "this set is empty"
Like what?
let’s say
M = {a,b,j,z}
V = {i,a,y}
for normal u do I have to write it as
{a…
or can I do {z…
order doesn't matter
aleks is dumb then
I mean... there isn't a strict rule. It's typically nice to have some sort of order but both are acceptable.
marked me for not putting in in alphabetical
it's conventional to put the elements of a set in order if an obvious ordering exists
thanks for the real world clarification though
but you can list the elements in any order you want and it'll still be the same set
gotcha
do you think I’ll ever have to write the U symbols myself
or will it always be formatted like M u Z etc
like on a computer?
Stitches
well like a website like this
They could make it a drop down list
if they expect you to write fancy symbols they will provide you with the means to do so
do you guys have any good way to remember the difference
U -> [U]nion
i$\cap$tersection
Ann
oh wow never thought of that
this is the one where it’s just what they have in common right
Of what?
this
Of Union and Intersection?
yeah
I mean, not really, no. Mostly in like infinite sets or in cases of large sets the questions could feel daunting but like, it's a super simple concept
Not in the standard form you're used to (ie. here's M, here's V, find the intersection). The proofs can get tricky because they're abstract (can't rely on any literal elements). You can find some in the document's latter pages.
Like a relatively simple one would be show $|A \cup B| = |A| + |B| - |A \cap B|$
Stitches
ooof
Where |A| is the number of elements in set A. Ie. if A = {1, 5, 6}, |A| = 3
Maybe thats later on
yeah
kinda? the rules are less obvious though
Oh is this the reason for that one probability rule thingy
P(A or B) = P(A) + P(B) - P(A and B), yes.
Cool
yeah dont know what that is yet
but I didn’t know this and now I have an understanding so
I don’t know it yet
could someone tell me my mistake here
either use {} or the O with the line through it, not both
teh O with the line through it already means "an empty set". so no need for curly brackets here
oh shit
okay thanks
I basically double crossed out
not really double cross, more like saying "the empty set set"
ah ok
thats all for now
thank you everyone who helped
.close
Closed by @drowsy river
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone give me a brief overview of converting heaviside functions to piecewise functions, just want to understand
the Heaviside step function?
yes
what convention are you using for H(0)?
alternatively, what is your definition of the Heaviside step function?
this is the convention that we use (engineering)
I see. this itself is piecewise.
yeah we are just given examples like this with our definition and told to convert to piecewise
ok
i think it is clicking in my head now
hm, this is more of converting transformations of Heaviside functions to a piecewise function.
i see that now, we are just taught its an on-off switch and its the most simple piecewise function
but its starting to make more sense to me now
I'd suggest expanding each of the step functions
And then looking at the different sections you're left with
Combining anything that overlaps
okay i get it now, thank u both
if you're done, please remember to close the channel, OP.
.close
Closed by @fickle girder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
There is a geometric sequence of length 3 and if you add 24 to the 2nd term and subtract 24 from the 3rd term you get an arithmetic sequence. The sum of all 3 terms is 168
i am asked to find the sequence
here is my previous work but i sidnt reallly get anywhere
ok so i was gonna ask whether 168 was the sum of the AP or that of the GP but those two total to the same amount anyway.
yes
you've already found that $a_1 + d = 56$ and you know that $a_1 + d = a_2 + 24$ as per your write-out of the terms in both sequences.
Ann
so you can find the 2nd term in the GP. as in you straight up know its value.
wrong both times, it's 32.
the middle term of the AP is 56 and this is 24 higher than the middle term of the GP
i meant 56 in the arithmetic
yes that is true then
ok
work out the entire GP though
you know that its other two terms are (in your notation) 32/k and 32*k
you are right i took a different approach but i think that the results will be teh same
@tranquil basin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tranquil basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @viral robin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
nevermind i didnt
heres what i tried
AB_C_D_E_
5P2 * 4! * 2!
5 slots for F and G
and AB, C, D, E is 4 factorial * 2! for AB
wait never mind i did misclick my calculator
.close
Closed by @viral robin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Lmao
what
.unsolved
✅
bro this C and P stuff looks so similar sorry
@viral robin Alright, so no hurries
we'll wait until you get the answer
We don't bite lol
Nice
thanks everyone
I see
.solved
Closed by @vernal yacht
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Why did you open?
blud is thanking everyone for doing absolutely nothing
sorry guys and thanks to everybody
Eat 5 stars
youre welcome radium
I was waiting for them to post the answer. The were too rushy to clopen the channel
Rushy*
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help me with 13
[ \sin^2\left( \frac{x}{2}\right) = \frac{1-\cos x}{2}] might be useful?
k
i thought that but it will increase variables i guessed
wdym increase the variables?
cos😅
Maybe check the range
sin(x)sin^2(x/2)=-1
sin^2(x/2) can only be positive
sin(x) should be -1
maybe divide both sides by 13, then take alpha= arccos(12/13), and simplify LHS into sin(alpha+x)
I’m pretty sure this has no real solutions.
Well it doesn’t have Real solution
Don’t doubt yourself! If you got that answer, you should say so to those trying to help! You might be able to get your answer faster that way.
ohk ill take care next time
the thing id i always doubt my solution in ranges and domains
who knows if i forget to include some imp stuffs
does it have a solution @stoic cloud ?
Nah
I don’t believe it has a real solution but it probably does in the complex plane.
Yeah it has no solutions in real numbers
Although I don’t have proof of it other than using a calculator.
pls no
wait man
i mean solution of this problem
Yeah I mean that too
Divide both sides by 13
Then you can simplify into sin(x+alpha)
And RHS will be >1
i mean the prblm of doubting myself
There are solutions in the complex plane. However, they are EXTREMELY repulsive.
Oh
man
help me with 17 too pls
i g no solution
2^(sec^2x) + 2^(cosec^2x)= cos^2 x.sin^2 2y
Find the number of solutions as ordered pair $(x, y)$ such that 2^{\sec^2x} + 2^{\mathrm^2y} = 2\cos^2x(1 - \cos^22y)$ in the range of $0$ to $2\pi$
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
yeah i used 😭
Closed by @fleet lake
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\max_{\bd{x} : \nrm{\bd{x}} = 1} \nrm{\bd{Ax}}$ would be the maximum value of $\nrm{\bd{Ax}}$ taken over all $\bd{x}$ such that $\nrm{\bd{x}} = 1$.
Ann
argmax refers to specifically the x that makes this maximum happen.
in this case yes
🗿
well
no
it's going to be a set of vectors
it might as well be treated as one (even if formally it probably wouldn't be)
heres the difference between max and argmax illustrated
you may also see argmin. its relationship to min is the same.
because funny
yes
[1,4] \cup {4.20} rather.
mq
$[1,4] \cup {4.2}$
Ann
We want a set only with numbers
wdym
of what
the incorrect set
?
nothing particularly concise
like, short of {x in R : 1 <=x <= 4 or x=4.20}
I can't think of anything else
@thin dagger Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @thin dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello guys i need some help with this physics exercice
here i tried to add R/2 with R/2 because there is eventually the same current in both of them. They get divided in the first place then they reunite again
the problem is if i try to calclate V1 using this method it gives me a wrong answer compared to the normal method
can anyone clarify this pls?
what answer did you get, and how did you get it
(Show working)
!done?
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
i converted it to the norton model then calculated I in V1. then multipliyed it by R instead of 2r
thanks anyways
.close
Closed by @ornate bolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, i need some help real quick, it seems easy but idk why i cant think of how to do it, but how do i find the limit of x-3ln(x) in +inf??
im just missing an easy thing ig but i've been on it for 5 minutes and it's a bit annoying to see something that easy but not finding the solution
My first thought is raising e to this power
why that??
Just seeing ln
oh yeah but even if it was the solution i cant really just put as an exponent
there's no equality
e^(x-3ln(x)) = (e^x)/e^(3ln(x)) = e^x/x³
And then you can probably use the power series of e^x?
You can take ln afterwards again
im not sure i can just summon the exponential function just like that
it seems a bit too useful lmao
You can yes
still it's not equal to the original function
Yes which is why you take ln after you're done
so what's your final result???
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
i havent seen this method so if there's a trick i dont know it
and by graphing the function with ln i still dont have the same curve
You instead find the limit of ln(e^f(x))
Why are you graphing the function with ln
Show me the equations you're graphing
or i've messed up
maybe that
Show the equations
Lmao as long as you got it
Closed by @molten vigil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
It's smth you get used to after doing it a lot of times
No worries, feel free to ask again if you have more questions!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How does the leading coefficient in a function determine limits?
The power also matters like x^7 and x^8 will be different
(Note: this is for when x tends to positive and negative infinity)
Oh. So how does that affect it too?
The even odd ness of it
Like x^1=x how does that behave for x tending to infinity and - infinity
Ohhhh.
Key thing about limits is you’re trying to say what the value would be near a number but not at it, for infinity it’s a bit different instead you’re letting x get bigger and bigger “closer to infinity”
Compare that to x^2
Then it would be positive to infinity?
All odd powers behave the same?
Yes
Same with even?
Yes
The difference with even is that -infty goes to infinity
But odd goes to -infinity
Also if the coefficient is negative then everything i said is flipped
Except the bit about evens and odds being the same as each other
Like x^2 goes to infinity both ways -x^2 goes to -infinity both ways
If it’s like 2x^2 nothing changes
Try graphing the function x^n in Desmos or Geogebra
So if my limits are as x to infinity f(x) -infinity, and x to -infinity, then f(x) to infinity, then I have to have a negative coefficient with an odd exponent?
If they match both ways it’s even power and if they don’t it’s odd power then you work out sign based off which is positive and negative
Which of these has a dominating term like that
B.
Yes I think it’s that one try graphing it
But how do I determine right end vs. left end behavior?
For next question?
No, same one.
Oh so with the answer get the question?
I’m confused what you’re asking
I can share a graph with your answer to the question to see that it’s correct
So left and right ends of the graph have different behaviors. If I were to be asked if the left side went negative or positive infinity, how would I find that?
I checked the key, it is.
Yes.
So regardless of the power, for x tending to infinity it will have the same sign as the coefficient
Yes
If you think about it x^n for positive x will be positive because you are multiplying positive stuff together
Then the coefficient is the only thing that matters
So a positive coefficient, both are positive, if it’s negative and the exponent is odd, both are negative, if it’s a negative coefficient and exponent is even, only right side is negative?
No
Ok.
Even exponent they are same odd exponent they are different
Ohhhh.
the x tending positive infinity is infinity but the sign of that infinity depends on the sign of coefficient (they are the same)
So best thing to do is look at the exponent first to see if the behaviors are the same?
I think the coefficient is more important as that tells you the limit for when x tends to positive infinity
Then use powers to find the negative infinity case (same or different*)
Ok.
So,
Positive coefficient and even exponent, both to positive infinity
Negative coefficient and even exponent, both to negative infinity
How do you know which side is negative and which is positive though when odd exponent?
The coefficient of the term is the positive infinity case
So if it’s like 17 then the positive infinity case is positive
Regardless of exponent
Ohhh, ok. Thank you!
!done?
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
Closed by @fair moon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Thank you!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this south of east or north of west?
cause chatgpt keeps telling me south of east but i thouhgt it was north of west
why is it south of east?
you want to create an equilabrium
so its supposed to be in the opposite direction of the total force
Firstly you need to work out what the total force is
ohhh ok that makes sense. tysm
also stop trying to use chatgpt as an authority on physics, it will be right sometimes, but it can also be incredibly wrong
yah thats why i came here to double check
click the X next to the embed when hovering over your message.
Closed by @floral badger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I can't tell if pearson just hates me or not. I've been going at these questions for who knows how long but it just won't click and the explanations aren't helping me. can someone explain this to me?
hey
are you stuck on 1 ?
or which
so discontinuity
in graph
looks as if there is a gap in drawing the function
Hey 🥹 there are more parts after this but I thought I understood discontinuity and got it wrong, this is my last try so I came here
so think of it if we have to raise the pen at some point to continue drawing then its not continious
if its continious we can draw it out in one go
It'd be better if you showed what you tried and why you think it's right or wrong
short of
ok so where do you see the first point where there is a gap in the graph
1 because it cuts off? or 2 because of the jump
Go through the checklist
yes on x=2
Where do you think the discontinuities are
it has a gap
At x=1, is f defined?
is the orange line denoting a asymptotic line ?
Yes it is
probably is
Correct, so that's a discontinuity
if not then there is no point in talking about continiouty there
oooh
Next point, again go through the checklist
next would be 3 because it violated #1 yea?
no no
like the 3 rules
that might be violated
go from 1 to 3 and tell me which are violated and which not
cuz no solid dot?
yeas it does
Correct, but there's another point
You said it here, why skip it now?
yes but why is 2
Yes, do you know why 2 is?
because #3 isnt satisfied?
No
?
we are talking about at x=2
There's no asymptote at x=2
i cant read a graph sorry xd
because #2 isnt satisfied
the lim isnt the same of both sides
also asymptote doesnt mean the limit exist
Exactly
oooh ok ok
its only giving you info that one of the side limits is infinite
ok so these are all
So you have 1,2,3; any more points?
5?
what would it violate?
#2
Careful about this
OOOH I COMPLETELY FORGOT ABOUT THAT
even if it wasnt that is a point of continuity btw
No it's not
how is it not
f is not defined there
yea well not discontinuity either
we cant talk about continuity there
We can; it is a discontinuity, just not in the interval (0,5)
.
Yes
oh cuz its not a [0,5] interval?
it makes no sense to talk about discontinuity at a point that is at x=7
Continuity implies that the function is defined; the function is not defined at 7, so it's obviously not continuous there either
it makes no sense to talk about continuity there at the first place
Yes, in your problem you are not counting 0 and 5
oh so its just because there is no line that actually touces x=5?
OOOH
THATS SO SMARRT
ok so my discontinuities are 1,2,3
@late dust talking about continuity for example for lnx in negative numbers is meaningless
now its asking for what violates the 1st condition, that would be 2 and 3?
I have news for you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_logarithm
in the reals
obviously im talking about the real numbers
a condition of continuity is the limit
Still applies: not defined, not continuous
the limit expects that the function is defind around the poitn
either on (x,a) or (a,x)
or both
you cant talk about continuity on places where the limit isnt even properly defined
I'm not gonna argue with you; a function f is continuous at c if the limit x->c of f(x) equals f(c); if f(c) is not defined, there is no equality, and so no continuity
there is no meaning to talk about continuity
its like examing limit x->-oo lnx

i did it 🗣️
i dont think we talk about discontinuity at x=a where a have interval gap with the domain on both sides
its asking for the 2nd condition now, that'd be 1, 2 yea?
yea it was right 🥹
ok this is the tricky one i was stuck on
it satisfies the first 2 but violates the third
none of them do, no?
yea i dont see any
youd need both lines to go into a empty dot
and there to be a full dot upper or lower than the other one
like this
here the limit exists
the limit doesnt care about what happens at x=a
Closed by @acoustic marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi i have test review and i dont know how to do this complicated improperly
Do you get a calculator?
i already have a calculator
You could just put the numbers in, but you should try to simplify first, like $\frac{1}{\frac{1}{x}}=x$
BBMaths
Do you know how many L in a tablespoon?
@wise rain Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
It looks like C might be the center of the circle here
am I wrong to assume that?
and if I am right, how do I know for sure?
Hmm yes it should be the center
You already have CD = CB
You need to show they're equal to CA
Use congruent triangles

Hullo Sky
I have another idea tho
Wsp
Just another day not being green
Today is the day 🔥🔥
Actually you don't even need those lmao
Just connect A and C and tell me what happens
what do you mean by that?
congruent triangles make sense to me because it splits the 120 into 60 & 60
oh yeah diagonals are equal
I thought maybe you could invoke it without proving
right?
Not that one
wait no
Diagonals are angle bisectors
The proof uses congruent triangles
But if it's mentioned as a property
You can just use it directly
Check what your book says
dont have a book, this is a competition problem
Ah in that case prove it ig
but anyway, moving on from this part, i also got the question wrong 😭
from here i set r=1
so area of circle is pi
then i found area of rhombus by doing 1/2 * base * height of the two triangles
height is sqrt(2)
base is1
so area is sqrt(2)
is then ido sqrt(2)/pi
for ~0.45 but thats wrong
correct is 0.2757
That sounds wrong
The area of a rhombus is just base * height
Your base is 1
And your height is sin 60
Which is sqrt(3)/2 right
,calc sqrt(3)/2pi
Result:
0.2756644477109
Yup
Yeah
im going to write this formula down
actually ill prob just write all area formulas
Essentially a rhombus is two congruent triangles
A triangle is 1/2* base * height
So a rhombus is base * height
This is true of a parallelogram as well
yeah that makes sense
now i realize i just assumed height of each triangle was
sqrt(2)
but its actually sqrt(3)/2
now that i do pythagorean
so i was on the right track anyway
Yup
Also another fun fact
Area of a parallelogram is ab sin θ
So you can just use that directly
what is the value of a & b?
a and b are the side lengths
...no
arent sides equal?
a.a is not 2a
Yes
Closed by @crystal radish
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if $a(a^{24}-1)$ is divisible by p for all interger a (p is a prime number) then $a^{24}-1$ is divisible by $a^{p} - 1$ (basically 24 is divisible by p)
shio6695
it's related to fermat little theorem but im not sure how to prove it
if $a(a^{24}-1)$ is divisible by p for all interger a (p is a prime number) then $a^{24}-1$ is divisible by $a^{p-1} - 1$ (basically 24 is divisible by p-1)
shio6695
fixed it a little
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
@rich eagle Has your question been resolved?
well the original problem is find all n where $a^25-a$ is divisible by n
well the original problem is find all n where $a^{25}-a$ is divisible by n
shio6695
(for all interger a), i just need to find the possible prime factors of n though
it's kinda obvious that $n$ could be $1$, $a$, $a^{24} - 1$ and $a^{25} - a$
1 divided by 0 equals Infinity
ofc negate all that and you got 8 results
well no i got it to be 32
you can just test it and see that n can be 2;3;5;7;13
but also things like 6 because n = 2*3
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
so we have n = 2^(a1) x 3^(a2) * 5^ (a3) * 7^(a4) * 13^(a5)
.unsolved
✅
a1,a2,a3,a4,a5 cannot be 2 or larger since for example if a1 is 2 or larger you can just pick 2 and it won't work
so a1,a2,a3,a4,a5 can be 0;1 and so there's 32 number n
i still have to prove that 2;3;5;7;13 are the only prime numbers n can be though, which mean i have to solve this which idk how to
@rich eagle Has your question been resolved?
You know that the largest $n$ is bounded above by $\gcd(3^{25}-3, 2^{25}-2)$
Civil Service Pigeon
,w gcd(3^25 - 3, 2^25 - 2)
,w prime factor 2730
can ya explain this
If an n works for all a, then it must work for a=2
that should be intuitive
and similarly it must work for a=3
aka it must work for both of those
Closed by @rich eagle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can some1 help idk if my answer is correct
what made you decide those limits DNE?
whats making you say its DNE for both of them
since the left side and right side isnt equal
second one is totally 5
what are the left and right limits you are getting?
can u point out to me where that line is like the approaching stuff
waitt what
yea?
!noans
The purpose of this server is to help you learn, not to hand out answers. Do not ask someone to give you the answer directly.
what if x=>1?
then its a root and quadratic intersection
try calculating the limits from both sides and you get that they are equal
wouldnt it be x=>1- = 1+3=4 then x=>1+=1? then since its not equal its DNE or is my x=>1+ side is wrong?
I’m a bit confused what you both mean by =>
its like approaches to
Do you mean $\ge$ >= or $\rightarrow$ ->?
BBMaths
Also asking you here
Roy
ohhh
this is correct
Shouldn't't it be >= ?
limit to 1 is DNE
some ppl write it like that
im sorryy
no it has both meanings
Mmhh
so ye your answer for limit to 1 is correct
im so dumbbb u were right on the 1 and 2 which is the answer is 3 and the 2nd one is 5
ohhh
if you practice a bit you will master it cause you already did the limit to 1 right
is it also 1?
Indeed
so its the same thing in number 5?
Nope, there's an empty dot at x = 7, meaning it's undefined there
Huh?
ohh so if its unshaded then its automatically undefined?
the coordination of the f(7)
ohh okayyy thakn you so much guysss
how do i close
Unless there's a shaded dot as well, like in question number 4 (at x=1))
.close
Closed by @stoic sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thank u guys
np
I’ve never seen => before, you should try to use what’s more common so less confusion
Use >= for ≥
Use -> for →
@stoic sparrow
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi there, I was just wondering how to do question ii.
the answers are simply: 5/2 * 5/2 = 25/4.
the answers to i. is c >= 25/8 btw
Find the area as a function of c and take the limit as c->0
i tried that wasn;t too successful, the answers' explanation is this: dyk why??
Show your attempt
area should be somethinggg along the lines of 15/4 = 2(ln(4))/c ?
unless i am wrong
15/4-2ln(4)/c soz
my original working for the previous question was wrong
ill try again
ok area function is very complex, something like this
and this is a tech free exam
so i think its more conceptual rather than area of a function hence the bare bones explanation
Hi
I just did g(x) = x solve
Ah okay the 3 is outside the square root
but this exam is tech free so i dont think it calls for an area functgin
when c goes to 0 your area function just becomes -2-x from -2 to 1/2. So the integral you actually need to compute is $$2\cdot\int_{-2}^{\frac{1}{2}}-x-2\mathrm{d}x=\frac{25}{4}$$ alternatively, this is just 2x the area of a triangle with base 5/2 and height 5/4. I.e the area is $2\cdot\frac{5}{2}}\frac{5}{4}=\frac{25}{4}
Herzog
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
uh huh is this a hard question or am i just not thinking hard enough LMAO
Did you not understand this?
i did understand it but for a calc free exam i dont know if i would've gotten that
on my own
That's why you prepare for it
Closed by @chrome prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
We didn't need any calculator here
Just plug in c=0 everywhere in this integral and the integral you need to do is much simpler
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Given that A and B are subsets of M. Prove that these following statements are equivalent:
a six-way equivalence huh
now I haven't started yet but what is confusing me is the way they present the proof of the equivalence of f) and a)
are you sure that's actually what they're doing? proving f=>a and also proving a=>f?
They only proved f -> a it seems
which is the part that confused me
because I think you also have to prove a -> f
can i see the whole proof
i dont speak viet but i should be able to figure out the notation
it's in Vietnamese so I'll translate
show the original too
or, post the original first, then translate afterwards
google lens tends to screw up math notation badly
alrighty
Wait nvm
they said the rest is "left for readers"
knowing math books, presumably all of it