#help-19
1 messages · Page 209 of 1
ig
should i just put the equation of p(x) and p(1/x) wherever they are
it will be a ugly mess tho but i aint sure what i can do
that's the masochist route 
ik
@wooden python lol is it cool
@wide pollen Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help me with how to graph slopes
Do you have a specific graph/problem in mind?
You want to know the slope from a graph? Or graph a line with some slope
Graph the Cartesian plane with slope
Thats very vague
Screenshot?
Imma show you my notebook
@frosty sinew Has your question been resolved?
so, graphing the line $-y = -8 + 8x$, as an example?
haseeb
Yes
you choose two values for x, usually x = 0 is one of them
and calculate the y value. in the case of x = 0 its simply -8
Yea but on the Cartesian plane I would start with 0 and then go down to -8?
yeah
so your first point is (0, -8)
your other is (1, 0)
draw a line between them using a ruler and extend it how much you want
What about the other 8
@frosty sinew Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
when x=1/3 the denominator is 0
but on the graph when x = 1/3 , y still exists
But y is just a straight line passing through 3/4
y is a function of x
it can't be defined that way if you want it to be defined for x=1/3
sorry I just don’t really get it
y is defined as some function of x
the problem is that that function is undefined for x=1/3
so y=3/4 for every other value of x
If it’s undefined what will happen?
Does that make the straight line straight
😭
there is a difference between (3x+9)/(4x+12) and 3/4
y=3/4 is a horizontal line
yes
Is it acc missing
x=-1/3 is the only point that affects the function, the rest is fine. So when x=-1/3, it's undefined, visually it's continuous, but there's a hole.
OHHHHHHH
where would the hole go
Is that where complex nunber plays in
Like if I look at above
It’s gonna be curved in
Complex number can't help either, when denominator is 0, it's undefined.
no. thats unrelated
Oh
try to click on the curve at x=-1/3
yeah just ignore this then
Enter y(-1/3)
How
The way you wrote y in desmos, write y(-1/3)
no
3D dimension lol
it is gonna be at (-1/3, 3/4)
but not really
there is nothing there
nothing from the curve on this line x=-1/3
yeah its something like this
but what you showed is a differnet case
where the behaviour of the function is to blow up around the hole
Oh
Okay
Thank you for teaching me @woeful briar and @honest turtle
Have a good day or night!!
.close
Closed by @lost crest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
not again.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
@vapid leaf Did you try anything
tried getting banned
No like did he start the problem yet
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Huh? i solved the other ones not on paper im on the final step of the equasion now
wait how so
explain why you think it is true
you seem to be using (a + b)^4 = a^4 + b^4, but that is not true
try it with a = b = 1 if you don't believe me
x is to the power of 4 so squaring it gets rid of the square root and theres ^2 left over so that makes it x^2 then i just put -7^4 and added the 8
yea but that's now how taking powers of expressions of the form (a+b) works
like (a+b)^2 is not just a^2 + b^2 right?
it's a^2 + 2ab + b^2
oh do i need to foil?
okay thx
i need help
tbh i would suggest not multiplying it out
this is where im at did I mess up
oh cmon wolfram
can't you leave it as is though
what the flip
Rootx*Rootx is just x
this looks like a pain in the ass to expand
Closed by @last hearth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to solve
find degree and roots etc
degree is the highest exponent of x in the polynomial
ye i mean get in factired form
so you want to factor this
have you learnt about the rational root theorem? if not, i'm not sure how you would find one root to start
dont think so
this will be tricky
this the answer ig
sure, but without access to the RRT, i don't know how you would quickly find one root to start
finding one root at least allows us to turn the cubic into a quadratic and makes it a lot easier
the other method is trial and error with polynomial division
May I suggest factoring by grouping
oh yeah, that could work here
how
You can factor out a x^2 from the first two terms and then a -4 from the last two terms
Looks good, now you can factor out the common term
wdym
well you have $x^2(x-3)-4(x-3)$ so what do the $x^2$ term and the $-4$ term have in common?
MrTuxedoSteve13
like (x^2 - 4) (x - 3)
yep
well the $x^2-4$ is a difference of squares so you can factor that and you should get the answer
MrTuxedoSteve13
dont they both need ^2
$2^2 = 4$
MrTuxedoSteve13
You can always just force it by square rooting then squaring
For example, $x^2- 2 = x^2-\sqrt 2^2 = (x-\sqrt 2)(x+ \sqrt 2)$
frosst
Closed by @vapid violet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am trying to find the horizontal asymptote and I already checked the right bound so now I am checking the left. I simplified it as much as I could but now I don't know what to do
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
.close
Closed by @marble laurel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
you seem to have a channel already ongoing
how does this work
its not helping me
I am trying to find the horizontal asymptote and I already checked the right bound so now I am checking the left. I simplified it as much as I could but now I don't know what to do
I'd suggest using l'hopital. Take the derivative of the numerator and the denominator separately, then try to calculate that limit. If it is still infinity over infinity or the like, take another derivative. Let me know if you have more questions
this channel is closed. in the future, please stick to one channel only
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I get help on how to solve this? I don't understand the answer key
which part are you having trouble with from the answer key?
I don't understand why we're using the left limit as x approaches two
Look at what side y is approaching two as x approaches zero
because as f(x) approaches zero it approaches the value of 2 from values which are below 2
so the corresponding limit as x approaches 2 should also only consider values below 2
What cloud said
Closed by @acoustic gazelle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A museum is constructing a new wing with several rooms, whose layout is represented in the following map. The museum director needs to decide how to assign guards to these room, so that each room either directly contains a guard or is adjacent to a room where a guard is stationed. The goal is to minimize the number of guards.
Is it safe to assume adjacent refers to a connected room in this case?
Closed by @stray cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For all composite m, let f_m(n) be the function that maps n to (n^n % m). Let T_m > 0 be the period of f_m, ie for all values n, let f_m(n) = f_m(n + T_m). My question concerns the period's value. Define \lambda(m) as the Carmichael function, which can be found online (such as at Wikipedia. It is related to Euler's Phi function, and can be thought of as the minimum exponent that sends all values to 1 modulo a modulus m).
For all m, does f_m have T_m = lcm(m, λ(m))? Can someone confirm or deny this result?
$f_m \text{ has } T_m = \text{lcm}(m, \lambda(m))$
Yumdub
I think I have a proof, so I can show some if there are questions
Well Tm <= lcm(m, lambad(m)) is true
can you provide a counterexample? Maybe there's a smaller value?
AH ok I found a counter example
I wrote a program to confirm that T_21 = 42
$\text{but} \lcm(21, \lambda(21)) = \lcm(21, 6) = 42$
Yumdub
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
wait nvm...
ok ok try m = 15
then T_15 = 60 experimentally
lcm(15, \carmichael(15)) = 60, so that also matches
if you let n=0
Then T^T = 0 mod m
ok, that shows that T^T should need to be 0 modulo m I think
which shows T == 0 mod m
what question are you answering, the original or are you disputing what I just said?
I acknowledge your edit
goodbye
@woeful briar Just an FYI, I acknowledge that you originally answered a similar question in #elementary-number-theory, so I know you were at least somewhat interested. I don't mean to imply that I'm taking your question.
@violet sable Has your question been resolved?
ok ok, I was able to prove the result simply by myself. Thanks for your help, as flippant as it was. I will close the channel
.close
Closed by @violet sable
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
bro i need help im 100% lost rn
What do you need help with?
What about them
Well yea you can express it as one
Rip
ok inverses and domain and range of them and pieces functions
piecwise
idk what peice wise functions are
can you give me an example of one and maybe teach it to me
Well like
A function defined by multiple functions
Where each function is like the value the function takes for a particular range
?????
Ok ok
Example
I've shamelessly stolen this photo
So when you look to the left
You'll see the piecewise function definition
uh
There are two functions in this definition
2x and 3
yes
So you see that x<=0 to the right of 2x
yeah what does it mean
That means that if the x input into the function f(x) is less than or equal to 0
Then the function will output the value of 2x
Does that make sense so far
yes
And h(x)=3
If x<=0
Then f(x)=g(x)
So if the value of x inputted into the function is less than or equal to 0
it’s like 50% of my test
Rip gng
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
He kinda started more than 15m ago man
ok wait
this example
it said write the piecewise function rule for the absolute value functions
and we have f(x)= |x+5|
so then it leaves us with like x+5 and -x+5
right?
x+5 and -x-5
how did you get -x-5
Because if x+5>=0, then f(x)=x+5
so how do you get -x-5
But if x+5<0 then f(x)=-(x+5)
thays if tho
it’s not like that i thought
Ion what to say
that's how absolute values work my guy
|x| can be -x or x
but i dont think it really matters for your piecewise stuff rn, what are you struggling with?
He's struggling with interpreting their definitions
As seen here
And what they are in general
@slender cave Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I posted this previously too. No answer. Please someone help prove this
The procedure should be fairly straightforward
Parametrize the lines passing through (x4,y4) and enforce the ratio condition
This will give you the parameter and hence the line
Could you please explain what is parametrizeing
Which part of this are you having trouble with
I don't know where to begin
If a line passes through (x4,y4), it must have some slope t right?
So the equation such a line will be (y-y4)=t(x-x4)
This line will intersect the two lines L3 and L2 at one point each
Ok
Those are your B(t) and C(t)
Do I Assume those points?
Now enforce the condition that D divides the line segment joining B(t) and C(t) the ratio m1:m2
This will give you t
Put t back in this equation
And it will give you the line for BC
They depend on t
Anyways, did you understand till here?
Yeah
Okay then it's just a matter of crunching through the calculations
Closed by @edgy holly
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Gonna open again, if I mess up again .
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
compact is equiv to closed and bounded
there are lots of other sets that are closed and bounded
not just intervals
Closed by @idle cypress
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How is (x+a)(x+b)=x²+x(a+b)+ab.
Like I can not understand. Is it basic multiplication or something?
Just expand the formula on the left ?
yes
Thats it
have you learnt of how to express such form?
I understood
do you know how to expand (x+a)*d
you just FOIL it
you're basically multiplying each term in the two quantities, in a set order
first, outer, inner, last
and be mindful of the ±, because (x + 1) or (x - 1) is the same as (x, 1) or ( x, -1)
so it would be like this:
(x²) + (xb) + (ax) + (ab)
and then find like terms and collapse to make it cleaner
produces:
(x² + (a+b)x + ab) = 0
\* for *
(xd + ad). distribute d across both terms in the quantity. d(x) + d(a). when you multiply two variables you just put them next to each other.
like I was asking you...
My apologies, I mistook you for someone with a similar question who used this forum to ask instead of making a new one.
The explanation should be useful for the original asker anyways since he said he didn't know how
@mellow star Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @mellow star
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi! Can someone check what i did wrong for letter (c)? Because i got 284.794 as the answer, but the solution says 36.77 days, so 37 days is correct.
the question states 97.7% or 0.977 remains, but you put 0.997 into your calculator
Ohh, silly meee
You are right, thanks
@wooden oar Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wooden oar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i could write in this sever now
do you have a question to ask
okay
ye, I'll close this channel since you don't seem to have a problem
.close
Closed by @vernal yacht
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Have a good one
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help with a) i've gotten to x(one) = 3+2x(three) and x(two) = 3+2x(three) and x(1 and2) are basic and x(three) is free
Have you tried row-echlon form?
row-echelon form*
@torn basalt Has your question been resolved?
yeah
could you write it down on a paper and take a pic of it?
@torn basalt Has your question been resolved?
x−3(3+2z)+4z=−6⇒x−9−6z+4z=−6⇒x=3+2z.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got a hint to use rolle's theorem and induction. i tried induction but i ended up with the second ss which doesn't simplify using mvt
@severe abyss Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
different only in the infinite case:
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/39895/the-direct-sum-oplus-versus-the-cartesian-product-times
Closed by @thin dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Pre-Calc honors
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
8th or 9th?
for the 8th, you're thinking correctly , use the distance formula
D= undr [ ( x-4)^2 + (x^2-0)^2 ]
let the function inside the root be called f(x) and then we'll differentiate f(x) because we need to minimise it
f(x) = (x-4)^2 + x^4
f'(x) = 4x^3+2x-8
huh, it doesnt have any ration root, thats a hassle
uh, no, underoot doesnt work like that
what you did is you took underoot of (x-4)^2 and y^2 and added them
its underoot of their sum and not sum of their individual underoot
a way to proceed is you square both side, giving you D^2 = (x-4)^2 + (x^2)^2
I’ll try that
sure
D^2 = x^2 -8x +16 + y^2
right, and y=x^2 as its given, so you get x^4, cool?
No I don’t understand.
also, a bit of nuance, the ques has a language error, it should be 'curve' instead of 'line'
How does it get to x^4?
because the curve obeys the rule y=x^2 , and you got a term of y^2, try substituting y=x^2
why?
you cannot add x^2 and x^4 = x^6
they have different exponents, you cannot add exponents, had 2 and 4 be in coeffecient instead of power, you could've write 2x+4x=6x
no
.
you get D^2 as this
Ok…
Wait then root the whole thing?
Nope…
Oh wait I wrote it wrong
It’s closer than y = root(x)
But it doesn’t match what it should be…X should be positive not negative.
X^2 +x -4, what’s wrong with it
nah, you understood how D^2 equals x^4+(x-4)^2 right?
Yeah
now, we have to find the 'minimum' distance between the curve and point (4,0) which means we have to find such a x for which x^4 + (x-4)^2 minimises
the way we can do this is let f(x) = x^4 + (x-4)^2
and then differentiate this to find the value of x at which function minimises
I’m asking ChatGPT and it’s saying the same thing, how am I supposed to “differentiate” to an entirely different equation?
How does x^4 become 4x^3?
Just how?
How am I supposed to do this 🙏
Power rule
d/dx(x^n)=nx^(n-1)
Where n is a constant
We never learned that.
It’s been forever…
Is this a calc class?
Pre-Calc honors
My teacher got 14 emails in one hour over this homework 😬
Including me 
So…yeah. Please help me 😓
If I can’t use derivative, then what?
I’ve been stuck on this for the past hour…literally.
I n e e d h e l p
I’m just gonna submit as is, 1/3
Also, thanks for helping @shell haven and @polar echo
.close
Closed by @fleet oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yo
,rccw
How can i find this out
have you tried using contradiction?
not sure what is that
assume that exactly two of the numbers are odd, then prove False
i havent done that before
well, try it
assume this and the property in the question, then try and find a contradiction
can you just do it for me pls
no
y not
Let's say you have
a, b, and c
With the given information , you'll get
ab = c Q1 + 2
bc = a Q2 + 2
ac = b Q3 + 2
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.
can you proceed from here?
not not really
if, say, a and b are odd, can you find a contradiction?
Whats a condradiction
if you haven't been taught it, do you have any teacher you can ask for help?
do you have a teacher who taught you this?
no
then who is it due to?
What topics have you covered so far? At least we know what approach we can use for this exercise...
@shy scarab Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
-
Give 2 possible ex. of a function f that isnt cont at x = -4, but if f is redefined at -4 so that f(-4) = 10 then f becomes cont at x = -4
-
Determine if the following func is cont at a = 5 use the continuity checklist to justify your answer, if it isnt cont, identify points of discontinuity for g(x) = { x^2 - 25 / x - 5 where x =/ 5, or 10 where x = 5
Am I allowed to treat it like the way I am with just doing x =/ -4 and x = 4, for 1 & Am I doing it correctly? (I know its a little messy)
And, for #2, Is this being done correctly?
@blazing jolt Has your question been resolved?
@blazing jolt Has your question been resolved?
its correct if you forgot to add parentheses when you typed up #2
you wrote $x^2-\frac{25}x -5$ but you surely meant it with parentheses
gfauxpas
Same for #1 too?

I'm allowed to do that? *Just making sure
your work is correct, but, define "that", whats your q exactly
Give 2 possible ex. of a function f that isnt cont at x = -4, but if f is redefined at -4 so that f(-4) = 10 then f becomes cont at x = -4
Oh, sorry
I am allowed to treat it the way I am doing, just x doesnt equal -4, then x = -4, to solve the problem?*
you are allowed to define a function by cases like that such that it has one and only one discontinuity which is removable
Okay, just checking!
in fact
any answer you give will just be that in disguise even if you try another notation
think about why

Because they both lead up to 10
no, i mean in general, a function like tharlt
lemme give you an example
let P be a property , like , "x is rational" or "x = 7"
then Iverson brackets are defined by:
[P(x)]=1, if P(x) is true, 0 otherwise
let me define a function h
h(x)=x²[x != 6]+cos x[x=6]
this is just what youre doing, but written with a different notation or perspective
every answer to this type of question, continuous except for exactly one discontinuity that can be redefined
will be essentially the type of function you defined, blah for x!=constant, blah blah for x=constant
Since its continuous, it just needs redefined if it's this sort of way, with < or > being the triggers, basically then
continuous everywhere else*
yeahh
im saying that whether you use cases, >, <, !=, iverson brackets, etc
it will.be all.the same idea just with different notation
want a fancy example?
Sure
let s(x)=sin(x)/x, where this expression describes a continuous function, and defined by limits otherwise
but this is just saying s(x)=sin x/x, if x!=0, and 1 if x = 0
there's no way around it
any answer will.be that type of function fundamentally
I see.
the limit of sin x/x as x to 0 is 1 if you didnt know
@blazing jolt Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @blazing jolt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've been trying to learn this for the longest time I don’t understand how we know what to put for the n’s I get the numbers hes just substituting but how about the n’s
He is just plugging n-2, n-1 and n into the sequence you sum
But why specifically n-2 how do we know that we’re supposed to start with that
We do not start with n-2
We start with 1 which is the lower limit of the sum
But we can't write the sum up to n
So we skip some elements with ... and continue at end
So we know where we start, a few terms after that and then a few terms at the end
you're just trying to find a pattern
he could've written ... then started after that from n-3 or n-1
it doesn't matter really
how i learned method of differences, i wrote it all in columns which i do think is probably better (atleast imo)
Σ (r - 1/r + 1/r-1)
= 2 - 1/2 + 1
- 3 - 1/3 + 1/2
- 4 - 1/4 + 1/3
- 5 - 1/5 + 1/4
... - (n-1) - 1/(n-1) + 1/(n-2)
- n - 1/n + 1/(n-1)
then we'd cross things out when recognising a pattern
and circle the terms that we keep
We keep the terms that don’t get cancelled out right
in this case, it would be a case of
n 1
Σ r - ---
r = 1 n
i think
yea
do u do a level fm
oh, iAL?
Yeah
i did british a levels edexcel
i just finished it
anyone whos done al maths would recognise tlmaths 😭
😭 he carried me through p3 when I self studied that fm isn’t going as smoothly but it’s ok eventually I’ll hopefully learn everything
How about the 2 3 4 n-2 n-1 aren’t they left over?
They are in the sum
Wdym
So they get cancelled out in those?
the thing with method of differences is that we use it when we recognise that the summation will result in a pattern which consistently brings out a cancelling out pattern.
i think it would be useful to set out the working like this
i think it would be useful to set out the working like this
@robust glade Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for non singular matrix $A$ is it the case that $| A^{-1}| = |A|^{-1}$? I have one direction, $1 \leq |\mathbf{I}| = |AA^{-1} | \leq |A||A|^{-1}$ is the reverse true?
uwu
Is this for any norm ?
yes
Ok consider the infinity norm, and consider the diagonal matrix (1,2,…,n)
Norm of A = n
Norm of A^-1 = 1
Closed by @gritty furnace
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont really get the point of this, arent these just variations of vector space axioms
no theyre CONSEQUENCES of vector space axioms
for example, (c) follows by distributivity only once you prove -v = -1v for all vectors v, it's not an axiomn that for every v, -v = -1v
it's true but not axiomatic
I think you should prove that first, for every vector v, -1v = -v
it will give you a powerful tool for the parts of the problem @swift heron
ic
for this i did something like
(1 - 1)v = 0
v + (-1) * v = 0 (distribution and identity)
(-1) * v = 0 - v = -v (additive inverse and closure of addition?)
excellent, though I'd write an additional step 1v+(-1)v=0 after the first line
so now you've proven that you can replace "-v" with "-1v" and so problem a is to prove:
-1(-1v)=v
much easier, right?
yep!
alright i think i know how to do these
this question also tricked me, but i dont really know how to read this notation
this means the set of all functions with domain {1,2,...,n} and codomain a scalar ring
so functions
f: N -> F?
$$\bigcup_{i =1}^\infty \mathbb N^i \to \mathbb F$$
gfauxpas
easier to think about a space that's very isomorphic
f(1), f(2), f(3) ?
which is the set of sequences with only finitely many non-zero
it's well-established that these two spaces are "almost the same", if I were a teacher I'd let you assume it without proving
ah i see
because now it's clear how to add functions
this is an abuse of notation, reeally it's a direct product, but you probablyt didn't ge tto direct products yet
yeah we havent
because not only are you unioning it you're also adding a vector space structure, so "union" isn't a good enough of a symbol
buit don't worry about it
so at the end of the day these are functions
so if we wnat to find a basis
we want to make
think about the bases for R^n and C^n, you basically want something like that but for an infinite dimensional space
functions $\cbr{1,\dots,n}\to\mbb F$
ロケット・ジャンプ
$c_{1}f_{1} + c_{2}f_{2} + ... + c_{n}f_{n} = 0$ where c1 = c2 =... cn = 0
toast
write out the functions as infinite tuples
(x1,x2,x3,x4,...)
and only finitely many are non-zero
hm
so take a guess, intuitively
the standard bases for R^n and C^n
are what?
{e1,e2,e3} for C^3 for example is
((1,0,0) (0,1,0) (0,0,1))
hmm
what would it be for our space to make infinitely many?
i bet your instinctual guess will be correct
this notation means an ordered basis btw
which isn't bad, but just so you know
use curly brackets if you want an unordered set
for R^n i'd imagine
{e1, ... ,en} where e_j represents (0, 0, .... 1, 0, 0) where 1 is in the jth position
very good
now, how many coordinates do we have in our space?
countably infinite, with only finitely many non-zero
so what's e_i ?
n coords?
well
remember I'm considered an isomorphic space with infinitely many zeros because otherwise
it's not so obvious how to add vectors
oh my !
hold on
did I misread the question?
🛑
this is correct
ahhh
just need to prove it, sorry for the silly mistake
anyway you need to prove it
do you know kronecker delta notation? it makes the math easier to write
ahahah never heard of it
it's a function of 2 variables
$$\delta_{ij} = \begin{cases} 1 , \text{ if }i=j \ 0 \text{ otherwise}\end{cases}$$
gfauxpas
hm i see
so you can write your basis vectors for R^n, C^n, for example, as
what is i and j?
gfauxpas
using this notation try to pick a basis of functions $\cbr{1,\dots,n}\to\mbb F$
ロケット・ジャンプ
gfauxpas
yup
and for the basis e_2 for example is
e_2 = (delta12, delta22, delta32) = (0,1,0)
kk that ameksk sense too
so, anyway, teaching it to you because i think it will help you find the answer,
as roketto said
i think, im a little confused by the nottation, what is an example vector from this vector space of functions
gfauxpas
$(a,b,c,d,e) \mapsto abc^d\cos(2e\pi)$
gfauxpas
assuming the scalar ring is real numbers here, or complex
which it usually is in linear algebra
one of those two
ohhh hm so we take a tuple of natural numbers as the domain and output some element of a field?
yes
and forget my nonsense about adding tuples of different sizes that was me beind dumb
n is fixed
Ah bc it’s from {1 to n} -> F
wait
I think im still using my mistake
I'm so sorry
yes okay scratch that
I'm very tired rn
you wanted examples
the domain is simple
any number from 1 to n
not a tuple
honestly 😂 it’s all good It’s the first time I’ve seen this kind of notation befor
each
Ahhh
That makes sense
so it’s a single number -> element of field
gfauxpas
$n \mapsto n$
gfauxpas
$n \mapsto \log|n^2+1|$
gfauxpas
assuming the codomain is real numbers here, again
here's the problem
wait no problem
just be careful which is the domain which is the codomain
hm alr
alright let's think about what it means to be a vector space
let f, g be some functions in this space
f+g? alpha f?
with alpha in F
f+g should also be in V and so does alpha f
$(n \mapsto e^{in}) + (n \mapsto n) = ?$
gfauxpas
( n -> n + e^in)?
yup!
Ok lemme think about the original problem
$5(n \mapsto 2^n)$?
gfauxpas
(n -> 5 * 2^n)
yeah
So if we want a basis our basis should be a list of functions
now I’m not sure what those functions exactly are but f_n maps from some natural number and outputs some elements f(n)
this is confusing indeed because we dont normally think about vectors like this
or about this like vectors
the thing is
this function has n parts
what it does for i=1, for i=2, for i=3, ..., and for i=n
so any basis element
My best understanding is that for example if i = 2, then we get a function like f: 2 -> f(2)?
Hmmm
you want f(j) = 1 or 0
when 1, when 0?
there are many choices, but what';s the simplest most straightforward choice
and why am I picking 1 or 0? because those are the only two things I know for sure are in the field
because the simplest field is {0,1}
YES
Ohhh
$${\delta_i(j) : 1 \le i, j \le n}$$
gfauxpas
writing it as delta_i(j) because of function notation, but you dont have to
you could write $\delta_{ij}$ like how it's usualyl written and that's fine too
gfauxpas
ohh I see why it’s n parts now, like we could technically have f_3 : 3 -> f(4) but here f(4) = 0?
so
these are actually how tuples are defined
not necessarily how we think about tuples
we think about tuples as a list
but really, something like
$(4,5,i, 2-i)$
is
gfauxpas
$1 \mapsto 4, 2 \mapsto 5, 3 \mapsto i, 4 \mapsto 2-i$
gfauxpas
Ohhh
so even though this is the definition of a tuple, it's not usually how mathematicians use and think about tuples
but sometimes we do!
I see 😂
Ye
it means the same thing as
gfauxpas
$(\delta_{ij})$
gfauxpas
as a tuple !
Ahhh that makes sense now I think!
and you can just write $\delta_{ij}$ and mathematicians won't care which one you mean because they're equal
gfauxpas
it's just a matter of perspective
so, I personally would write delta_i(j) as a function because the problem presented the vector space as a space of functions
but they're the same creature
oh kk I see :)
I need to write this down when I get back
💀
Pretty interesting tho!
when I try to think of Lin alg, I try to visualize what I see so what made this so hard was that I had 0 intuition as to what I’m looking at
yeah
here's a cool thing
let's say we consider the bijection
{1} ~ 1, {1,2} ~ 2, {1,2,3} ~ 3, ..., {1, 2, ..., n} ~ n
obvious bijection, right?
Yep
the normal notation for
"all functions with domain X and codomain Y" is
$Y^X$ . this matches cardinality rules
gfauxpas
$|Y^X| = |Y|^{|X|}$
gfauxpas
gfauxpas
which is nice
yeah linear algebra is the first time students get exposed to more abstract stuff so it's great
Definitely 😂
like sitting in lecture feels like sitting in a foreign language class compared to real analysis
Ah
which has many advantages
the disadvantage is that the "first" element of a sequence is the 0th one
which can be confusing
Maybe a better notation is Z^+ for 1 - n
True
oh there are so many notation attempts of people trying to figure out what the best notation is
💀
gfauxpas
but that's bad because
these are used for something else
if you believe N should contain 0, then
N0={}, N1 = {0}
if you believe N should start at 1
N0={}, N1 = {1}
and in general
N_n = {0,1,2,3,..., n-1}
OR
N_n = {1, 2, 3, ..., n}

so those symbols are ambiguous
$\mathbb N_1$ has 4 meanings
gfauxpas
Agree 😂
Honestly it’s pretty funny
Well at the end of the day
It’s notation 😂
okay need to do laundry now
Closed by @swift heron
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.


