#help-19
1 messages · Page 182 of 1
is g(0) = 0 though?
i dun think g(0) was 3
Oh.
yup!
so given f(g(x)) and the original value of x, your job is simply to take the value of x, put it in g(x), get its value, then take the value of g(x) and do the same to f(x)
oops, phone
Is -28/9 the answer??
how did you get -28/9
wait wait
oh you're right, i'm sorry
mental calc fail
@jade trout yup you got it!
so you can do your questions now, right?
Closed by @jade trout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
✅
.solved
Closed by @jade trout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.
A computer shop charges 20 dollars per hour
(or a fraction of an hour) for the first two hours
and an additional 10 dollars per hour for each
succeeding hour. Represent your computer rental
fee using the function R(t) where t is the
number of hours you spent on the computer.
can R be piecewise?
and would e.g. half a hour cost 10$ or full 20$?
It's gonna be easiest to make it piecewise i'd say
ok piecewise makes so much more sense i qas thinking some absurd floor/ceil functions
Okay so can you find R(t) that works for the first 2 hours?
can you find a function R(t) which gives you the correct rental fee for t between 0 and 2
(meaning you dont need to worry about the change in price after 2 hours)
uhhjh
do you at least know what kind of function should R(t) be between 0 and 2?
nope
Will it be linear, quadratic, exponential, rational or what kind will it be?
30?
4?
Result:
4
i multiplied 20 to 0.2
perfect
How much would it cost for t hours (where t is no more than 2 hours)
how would you calculate that
(dont overthink it)
20?
not quite
If it's 1.5 hours, it costs 20*1.5$
if it's 0.2 hours, it costs 20*0.2$
if it's t hours, it costs ???
can you see the pattern?
ohh
do you know how piecewise functions work btw? Do you know how to write it?
yes
okay cool
so for your verification, the first part should look kinda like this
now we will need to determine the cost if t is more than 2
yes
how would you calculate the rental fee for e.g. 7 hours?
20 x 7?
not quite
A computer shop charges 20 dollars per hour
(or a fraction of an hour) for the first two hours
and an additional 10 dollars per hour for each
succeeding hour. Represent your computer rental
fee using the function R(t) where t is the
number of hours you spent on the computer.
let's re-read the question
it says that it costs only 10$ per hour for every additional hour after 2 hours
so what would the total cost be for e.g. 3 hours?
that would be correct if the fee was $20/hr throughout
Yeah, in the question they offer kind of a discount if you rent it for more than 2 hours
90?
30 x 3
Why 30 and why x 3?
Maybe you can think of such function $20[\min(t,2)]+10[\max(t-2,0)]$
Emmaaaaa
ill try to explain how it works
Where [] takes the ceiling
for the first hour, you pay 20$
for the second hour, you pay another 20$
for the third hour, you only pay 10$
if you wanted to rent it for annother hour, you'd add another 10$
qait where did 90 comef rom
its incorrect, i thought you were answering the t=7 one
anyway, now that you know how it works, try calculating the cost for 7 hours
is it 90 too
It is 90, yes
40+50 7 hours
the 3 hour one would cost 50$, not 90$
because the first hour costs 20, the second costs 20 and the third costs 10
okk
Write it piecewise or use min function to create a stop time
okay so if it was something more, such as 12 hours, how would you calcuate the cost for that?
no need to compute the number, just say how
first hour costs 20 then the second 20 and the third and so on costs 10
Yes
Yes, but instead of adding 12 numbers, you could perhaps utilize some multiplication
to make the process simpler
How
well, we could for example add the first 2 hours separately
that'd make 40$ for the first 2 hours
40
Another way is you see time interval completely independently
once you account for the first 2 hours
40 x 10?
no, thats not how many hours remain, nor is it the final cost for 12 hours
wtgh
we already calculated the cost for first 2 hours, it was 40$
im asking how many hours remain to be accounted for?
of the total 12
So 12 hours means the first 2 hours and 10 hours separated from first 2 hour
10..?
Yes, it's 12-2 = 10
ohh okk
and how much is the rental fee for each of those 10 hours?
140?
no, not quite
the first 2 hours cost 20$ per hour
and then the remaining 10 cost how much per hour?
the cost for the remaining 10 hours is 10$ per hour, so in total it would be 10 * 10$ which is 100$
Ueu
so the total cost for 12 hours would be
40$ for the first 2 hours
+
100$ for the remaining 10 hours
= 140$
just to check your understanding, can you do 16 hours now?
Maybe I’m a bit awkward, Kim have you tried to write down $R(t)$ on a paper it might help!
Emmaaaaa
wait sorry im a bit retarded rn im learning scienca nd math at the same time
hmm, the whole point of the question is finding R(t), so we dont know what it is yet
Try to list number on a paper might help I mean 😢
like exactly at the same time? If so then it might be better to focus on one thing at time
yeasorry
Imagine you’re a greedy owner of computer shop, extracting money based on the rule
How to exactly make sure the rule is apply? A customer used the shop for one hour how much? 2 hours how much? How’s 3
List them on a paper
list the cost in hour [2,3), [3, 4), [4,5) , ... what pattern do you see
oh is it that way, then you may get an even simpler expression than what i had in mind
Fractional values won’t count so
we are going for a piecewise func btw, not some absolute value shit (because piecewise is likely simpler and easier to understand)
It’s always take the the ceiling of time so succeeding hour
it was said that 30mins would cost 10$, so i think they will count
sorry for that typo lol
A computer shop charges 20 dollars per hour
(or a fraction of an hour) for the first two hours
and an additional 10 dollars per hour for each
succeeding hour. Represent your computer rental
fee using the function R(t) where t is the
number of hours you spent on the computer.
Per hour or a fraction of an hour
The easiest representation will be $20\min(\ceil{t},2)+10\max(\ceil{t-2},0)$
Emmaaaaa
The function round up the time and take only positive value.. though I think it’s only beneficial to list number for study purposes
except the OP prolly doesnt understand half of the symbols....
how did you get this btw?
That’s why it’s helpful he thinks as an owner themselves and list number
i miscounted
this is still not correct
so how'd you get 560?
1st hour costs 20$
2nd hour costs 20$
3rd hour costs 10$
4th hour costs 10$
5th hour costs 10$
...
out of the 16 hours, how many hours cost 20$ and how many cost just 10$
Just add to the number helper listed for you
1 hour 20 + 20(second hour) +10 (third hour)+ 10(forth hour),…,10(sixteenth hour)
How many 10s and how many 20s?
180
thats the correct result, now how did you calculate it?
I added

okay perfect
now remember that multiplication is just repeated addition
e.g. multiplying 4 by 5 is the same thing as adding four 5s
and it works in the other direction as well
adding fourteen 10s is the same thing as 14 * 10
and adding two 20s is the same thing as 2 * 20
o
so instead of adding so many numbers, you can simply multiply
okok
okok
in t hours (where t is more than 2), how many hours will cost 20$ and how many hours will cost only 10$?
in 16 hours, it was 2hrs and 14hrs respectively
what will it be in t hours?
uM
2 hrs and 10 hrs?
or are you?
i am
that'd be in 12 hours
the whole point of adding t is to make it more general
t can be anything
t could be 16, 12
or it could be 100
and you have to find something thatll work for all of them
Okay so in 16 hours, 2 of them cost 20$ and 14 cost 10$
in 12 hours, 2 of them ccost 20$ and 10 cost 10$
yes
we could also write it as in 16 hours, 2 of them cost 20$ and 16-2 of them cost 10$
In [anything] hours, 2 of them cost 20$ and [anything] - 2 of them cost 10$
as long as [anything] is more than 2
I might kill myself bc of matk
A computer shop charges 20 dollars per hour
(or a fraction of an hour) for the first two hours
and an additional 10 dollars per hour for each
succeeding hour. Represent your computer rental
fee using the function R(t) where t is the
number of hours you spent on the computer.
everyone struggles with variables till they get used to them
can you understand this?
Wait sorrty are e doing the next part already
Yeah, we are
ob
are you actually feeling suicidal right now or was this an exaggeration?
we are now trying to find the rental fee if they rent it for more than 2 hours
Uhhhhh
2 hours and another 2 hours?
i mean that we are already focusing on the 2nd part (which is when t > 2, i.e. they rent it for more than 2 hours)
soo we ended here
is that part clear?
nah can you rephrase that my bad
and this was clear?
yes
yeah so the main point of what i was saying that the first 2 hours cost 20$ each and what remains is 16-2 hours, which cost 10$ each
the point is that the 14 was calculated as 16-2
16-2 hours?
yes, 16-2 hours is same as 14 hours
1st hour costs 20$
2nd hour costs 20$
3rd hour costs 10$
4th hour costs 10$
5th hour costs 10$
...
t-th hour costs 10$
in general, the first 2 hours will cost 20$ each and what remains is t - 2 hours, which will cost 10$ each
yea
note that this is just generalization, its not anything super-new. We just replaced the 16 by t, because the process is quite general
okay so if the first 2 hours cost 20$ each and the remaining t-2 hours cost 10$ each, what will be the total cost for the t hours?
remember to use the multiplication trick
you can look back at how it was done with 16 hours, it will be very similar
1st hour costs 20$
2nd hour costs 20$
3rd hour costs 10$
4th hour costs 10$
5th hour costs 10$
...
t-th hour costs 10$
You are basically adding up this list, there are two 20s and t-2 10s
how could we simplify that with multiplication?
The result wont be a single number btw, it will be an expression containing the variable t
butting in to say: think about what you would do to calculate this for 50 hours
youre not going to add up numbers all day to do it, youre going to take a shortcut using multiplication
the formula is just a way to write down this shortcut, with t standing in for the number you calculate
t-2 x 10?
what about the initial $20 and $20 for the 1st and 2nd hour
rn youve handled the 3rd hour through the t-th hour with (t - 2) x 10
This is just the cost for the remaining t-2 hours, what about the first 2 hrs?
40
oh and btw we have to use parenthesis, so it should be (t-2) x 10
oh mb
And together that gives...?
oh also $ signs are written to the left of the number
$5 = 5 dollars
theyre both read out loud as "5 dollars"
40 (t-2) x 10??
oh, thanks, didnt know that
presumably "together" means adding them...
40 + (t - 2) x 10, right?
if you wanted to figure out the 50th hour, that is what youd do
Yeah,we have to add the (cost of) first 2 hours to the (cost of) remaining t-2 hours
where the hehll did 50 cocme from 💔
bro you gotta read what I just said
if you wanted to figure out the cost up to the 50th hour, that is what youd do
40 + (50 - 2) x 10
right?
bruh
we can verify that it works for the 16 hrs as well
mb wasnt reading ur messaeg
,calc 40 + (16 - 2) * 10
Result:
180
and it does
ohjh
whatever t>2 we use, it will always give us the correct cost
and keep in mind there we need t > 2 for this to work
if you had t = 1, you wouldnt need to do the (t - 2) x 10 calculation
you know itd just be 20 dollars
Yeah, you can now add this part to the piecewise fn R(t)
you can send a photo / screenshot here and we can verify it
wait uh @tropic thunder -2 came from the 2 hours or
there is total of t hours and the first 2 hours cost 20$
what remains is t-2 hours
OK
we can verify that (t-2) hours + 2 hours = t hours
KK SO WJAT NOW
well, now we know that the rental fee is 40 + (t-2) * 10 for t > 2
in other words, R(t) = 40 + (t-2) * 10 for t > 2
you can add that to your piecewise function
also sorry what the hell is ceiling function
you don't need to worry about that for your current problem
o ok
Ok i thin k i understand
if you wanted to, you could simplify it with some algebra btw
40 + (t-2) * 10 = 40 + 10(t-2) = 40 + 10t - 10*2 = 40 + 10t - 20 = 20 + 10t
but its not necessary
errr
Welcome to the server, ren 
using () to denote a set 😭
this might be a good first hint
a function has only one output for each input btw
each pair is basically an input-output pair
so e.g. if you input 2, it gives 4, because there is (2, 4) in the set
if you input k, it gives 6, because there is (k, 6) in the set
and if you input 4, it gives k as an output, because there is (4, k) in the set
is this clear?
yeah and
okay now you need to ensure that one input cant lead to multiple outputs
otherwise it wouldnt be a function
there are some numbers which when put for k result in a function, and other numbers that dont result in a function
e.g. if we put 1 for k
think of ordered pairs as something like this
we get
{(2, 4), (1, 6), (4, 1)}
certain values of k will cause this to happen and this is a no-no
I see
Ok ok
i understand
this would be a valid function because each input has only one output
and this is an example of something that is not a function
because the input 2 has both 4 and 6 as an output
what would k have to be in order for input 2 to have both 4 and 6 as an output?
okkk
wjts
what
Why is pre calculus easier than gen math
🙂
we can also imagine the situation like this (notice that 2 -> 4, k -> 6 and 4 -> k)
now k is a variable so you can slide it around on the number line
where would you have to slide it to, to get to the situation on this pic
i.e. two different arrows from the number 2
a graph of a function is a map: $x \mapsto (x, f(x))$ such that$ x\in X $and $f(x)\in Y$ X is domain and Y is codomain
Emmaaaaa
we probably shouldn't bust out all the terms right now imo
However it’s a bit more complicated to comment about function itself, function is assigning value from domain and under a certain rule to codomain
There is a bit different than the function itself and graph
oohh
@fast slate you can try it out here
drag k around and see when it's a function and when it's not
Isn’t this about the rate collected?
Ok thank u iget it now
Why are we at highly abstract function theory 🫣
did you make this yourself
tjanks a lot @tepid pelican
yep
i like playing with desmos lol
Closed by @fast slate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i'm a geogebra person myself
ic, geogebra is nice too
You’re really patient!
And making that desmos 🫣🫣
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is the proof
for the radian to degree formula
I don't understand how you get from step 2 to step 3
Multiply both sides by theta
why do you do that
pretend we don't have step 3
Hmm
how would you know to do that to get to step 3
Pi is not degree
pi is radian
So no that hallowed circle
half circle is radian
Really? I didn’t know ! Learned 🥰
.
.
1 degree is pi•1/180 radian so k degree equals pi•k/180 radian
1 degree is 1/180 of a half circle
k degree is k/180 of a half circle
And you said half a circle is pi, right?
Because we know half a circle is pi
right
Yes

but i still dont understand this
1 degree = pi/180 rad
180 degrees is half a circle and 1 degree is 1/180 of 180 degree
Similarly with k degrees
Sorry I’m probably wrong but isn’t half pi equal to 90 degrees?
Yes, half circle is pi
half circle is pi
half pi is 90
yes
since pi is 180
yeah but how
do we get to
the multiplication
of theta
if we dont know that step 3 existed how would we get to that?
Theta represents an angle
.close
Closed by @lean kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im not sure how to do part ii
draw the lines y=1 and y=-1
wait why?
because those are the two y-values that stay in place when going from y=f(x) to y=1/f(x)
they are the solutions to y = 1/y
ooh i see
everything above the line y=1 gets mirrored and squished down into the band 0<y<1, and vice versa -- everything in the band 0<y<1 gets mirrored and stretched out into the region y>1
and likewise symmetrically below the x-axis
i get the right side of the graph but idk how to get the left side if that makes sense
why does it look like that
can you highlight which part(s) of it dont make sense to you
ok so look at the part for -1<x<1/2
the original function decreases from infinity down to 0
so the reciprocal instead increases from 0 up to infinity
is the reciprocal always the opposite? like is the orignal is increasing to infinity, then its recipriol is decreasing from infinity?
also i dont really understand x<-1
think about the behavior of the function 1/x
this is what all of this is based on
im so lost 😭
quick question: for ii, this is the product of 2 graphs y=x and y=|x| +1 right?
its the product of two functions but im not sure what you have in mind for the phrase "product of two graphs"
oh like when u sketch both them out but yeah function
Huh?
what method are you using for this
calculus? plotting points with a table?
i recommend splitting this into two cases
x>=0, and x<0
I think they mean plotting both x and |x| - 1 (for example, with different colours) and then multiply them pointwise
or if youd prefer 3 cases, x>0, x=0, x<0
But I'm not sure though
idek its how i was taught like ignore the writing on the side but you take the x points and u see how far away it is from the x axis then you multiple the spaces by the distances if that makes sense
oooh... that doesnt sound so helpful
aah. thats necessary if you only have a few points, but i wouldnt recommend that method here
when you have the full formula
I believe this might be helpful when one of the functions is a constant
@tired estuary
i was saying if you jsut have the graph without points or a formula u kinda have to like guess the values
how else can u do it?
.
true but for like other questions where they just give u f(x) and g(x) and estimate the shape of the product of the functions anyways ill try learn another way to do it
whats the definition of absolute value? there's more than one definition
which do you know
the value must be 0 or positive
sure, okay
lets put that into a formula
if x>0, |x|=x
if x=0, |x|=0
if x<0, |x|=-x
agree?
if x=-5, what's -x?
5?
cool
now split the function youre graphing into 3 cases
x>0, x=0,x<0
that will be the graph for 3 parts of the picture
to the right of the y axis , on the y axis, to the left of the y axis
okk
so u can do this method when your given the fuction but can u do this with only points?
ohh thats so simple okay

what did you get for the 3 pieces?
btw this is the common notation for a function defined by pieces
$$y=\begin{cases} x \text{ if } x > 1 \ \cdots \ \end{cases}$$
gfauxpas
im rlly slow hold on pls!
sure
good learning of notation, it's just y= instead of y on its own
,w plot y = x(|x|-1)
ook
omg my graph
you got (1,0) correct
it's okay I was hoping you would ask me for help for the intermediate steps 😅
wait i have the one i used where i just looked at the points and it looks similar
I was just waiting for you to say
y=
it's okay your work is still good, let's find where you made your mistakes
😭
I'm going to add "0" as a seperate case , so we have
what's here, this is good
i think i drew the wrong shape in the first place like i drew the originalfunction wrong omg
$$y = \begin{cases} x^2 - x \quad \text{ if } x > 0 \ 0 \quad \quad \quad \text{ if } x = 0} \ -x^2-x \quad \text{ if } x < 0 \end{cases}$$
gfauxpas
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
idek it was before when i looked at the graph and guessed where the points would be then plugged in values to see when it is positive or negative
so that works IF you choose your "guessing interval" intelligently
let's refine your method so you can do that
for that to work, you want to find where the function has roots, AKA zeroes. in other words, where it touches the x-axis
or crosses
can you find where this function has roots?
x= 1 ?
wait what
if x= 0 , y=0
yeah wdym 2?
OH lmao okayy
any other roots?
x= -1
yeah
so for your method to work
for polynomials at least
you need to check points
x < -1
-1 < x < 0
0 < x < 1
x > 1
into the orignal yeah? and see if the y values are positive ir negative to sketch it right
your teacher didn't teach you this? pfffftt
into the original or into the piecewise definition, it doesnt matter
same function, right?
so to graph polynomials, you should always chck to the left of, inbetween, and to the right of roots
stop violating my teacher hes the sweetestt
aw sorry
this will tell you where it's positive and where it's negative
it won't tell you shape of , say, a parabola
but if you see a function y=-2x^2 +1 you know it's a parabola anyway
rightt
btw for this one
you havent seen a case like this before so i'll tell you
this is two parabolas, connected to each other at x=0
two different parabolas
yuck
@tired estuary Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tired estuary
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
yeah
Apply them then
Show your work
kk
i did that then got kinda stuck
do i get derivative of sin2x then 1/cos3x and multiply?
,rccw
you didnt do chain
you forgot the 2 and 3 coming in front of the sin(2x) and cos(3x) when differentiating them
because of chain rule yeah
.close
Closed by @north sparrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
oh
.reopen
✅
Closed by @crude hollow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thx
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A cube is expanding in such a way that its edge is changing at a rate of 5cm/s. When its edge is 4cm
long determine the rate of change of its volume.
help
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
you didnt give any numbers with your question
that's the whole question? no other info? really?
how?
the edge is given when it began tho
the edge RATE is
I think we take it from 0
When it wasn't there

dy/dx=f'(x) and dx= 5 right or smth
V = a^3
Diff both sides , sub in values
What's volume of cube wrt side length
it's dt
unless you're approximating, don't set differentials equals to numbers like dx = 5, there should be a differential on both sides of the equation, like dy=5 dx (not saying this equation is correct in this context, im correcting your syntax)
it's changing with time
idk what you don't understand rn
this is it
i think im getting it
I mean "a" isnt the regular choice of varible maybe that's why mayo is confused
mayo how did you learn the volume of a cube
oh
a will be the side length
so dx/dt is 5 and we have to find dy/dt?
MAYO
yeah
you have 2 helpers asking you the same question
Yep

okay im out
What is volume of cube in terms of side length x homie 😭
Mhm
So now V = x^3
64
Differentiating this wrt time will give?

mhm
Wrt t
it's okay your doing great
3x^2 /5 right
Not exactly
mb
And what will the other side be
oh like that
Yep
You’re missing a term.
here x is a function of time.
So d(x^3)/dt = (dx/dt) x (3x^2)
And that's what you have to find
dx/dt is given
and so is x at that instant
whar
dx^3/dt is not juste 3x^2
ans is 240 right
I'm sorry I'm crashing out 💔
That’s not what he wrote tho
Ye
Yes
so thats it right
don’t forget units, but yes
Yep
Closed by @crude hollow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, was solving with gpt, think its hallucinating, i want to understand the problem
speed v of a body is linearly changing with the acceleration a of that body.
a) If its given that the speed of the body is 13m/s with an acceleration of 3m/s^2 and the speed of the body is 17m/s with acceleration of 5m/s^2, find the equation that will represent the speed of the body through acceleration.
b) By whay amount of acceleration will the speed be 3 times bigger than acceleration?
for the first one gpt solved it like this
v1=13m/s a1=3m/s^2, v2=17m/s a2=5m/s^2
plugging these values into this linear equation
a=kv+b
then into a system
{3=k13+b
{5=k17+b
then substracting the first from the second
5-3=k(17-13) ?
finally getting v=2a+7 for the relation
for part b we do the same but search for 3a?
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
but also this entire question is very weird. where do we get it from that acceleration and velocity should even follow a linear relationship?
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
speed v of a body is linearly changing with the acceleration a of that body.
given right
the problem is in another language im translating bar for bar, that relation also confuses me
the speed v of a body changes linearly with the acceleration a of that body.
oh gdi
How many body are there in the question a, one body can't have both acceleration of 3m/s^2 and 5m/s^2 if it's linarly changning speed
what language is it in
I think just two different applications of the question
macedonian
hm
think its talking about one body
i speak bulgarian, can you send the original? i can probably figure most of it out.
(watch this turn out to be a bad idea)
can’t be one body, if ur given 2speeds/accelerations
ok
your translation was basically correct but i read it too quickly at first and was slightly confused because of it
this looks like a physics problem but isn't
it is intentionally written in a confusing way imho
yeah
cause it sounds like mechanics
but really v and a are just variables
so you found v=2a+7 right?
b) asks you: what's the value of a for which v = 3a?
i assume b is the same thing as a but we plug in 3a instead of a
which one? v=2a+7?
well you found it yourself right
yes (gpt)
v depends linearly on a => v = ka + c
where k and c are constants that we have to find
so by linearly depending we choose the basic linear form of y=mx+b?
yes, that's what they meant with "se menuva linearno"
there's not much else to say about this
ok thats actually very helpfull to me thanks
no that is all i needed
i was lost as to where the equation form comes from
thanks a lot
.close
Closed by @covert root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Comment on the relationship between acceleration and net force in Experiment 1. How is this related to the slope of the line of best fit?
I don't understand how to figure this out
there are a bunch of questions like this in the lab and I can do the calculations and the expiriments but I always get stuck on these questions
think of F = ma as y = slope * x
the slope is mass times acceleration? I don't get it
ohh slope*x
ohhh slope is the mass?
no slope is not both mass and acceleration
its just mass?
what is the unit of the slope?
I don't know that ive been trying to figure that out
y = vertical axis usually
mathematically, what is the formula of the slope?
the slope is acceleration over force which rearranging f=ma gives 1/m = a/f so the slope is 1 over the mass
y2-y1/x2-x1
Could you not brainfeed other people, it isn't really helping if you don't let them do the crucial things
yeah I got more confused
ok sure, sorry im new i assumed that just answering it and explaining the answer is what the help channel is for
For each trial in Experiment 2, calculate the reciprocal of the wagon’s mass (one divided by the wagon’s mass). Using graph paper or computer software, referring to Experiment 2’s data including this new value, create a scatter plot of acceleration (on the vertical axis) versus the reciprocal of the wagon’s mass (on the horizontal axis).
Comment on the relationship between acceleration and the reciprocal of mass in Experiment 2. How is this related to the slope of the line of best fit?
Im having trouble with all these questions
am I just not taking into account enough of the information from the course?
You have a linear function of force and acceleration, F=ma, so as per riemann's example you'd have the y being acceleration and x being force
So you need to rearrange the formula to get it in this form
how is this different to my brainfeeding, your telling him the most crucial part
im still confused give me a second to read
Because I'm not doing the crucial part for them
the crucial part is knowing what to do not doing it, its not difficult to rearrange its difficult to know that rearranging is what you need to do to solve it
thats absurd to disagree with that
stop spamming noah's channel
noah's getting confused enough already without your arguing
is he getting notified?
whenever im stuck on this stuff I get a migraine
I really wish this server had a voice chat
where is the vc
where I don't see any
says no access for me
it says no access
oof nevermind
yea go back to this and do it on paper
can we take it somewhere else then
secret club
U can go to dms if you both are willing
can any of the people who disagreed with this give me an explaination as to why because i really dont see your perspective and just thumbs downs dont help
and go to dms or smwhere else just to not clutter here
so to start when I'm reporting to slope, what unit should I use for it
i think whats most important is how you approach solving new problems
How to solve it, by George Pólya goes over these concepts really well (imo)
does the overarching message give more importance to how to solve something or solving it
well, we have a graph. a line's equation is y=mx. we know y's unit and x's unit.
This channel is only for on-topic discussion. Please take casual conversation to #discussion or #chill.
you're thinking backwards. find the answer based on the question, not find the question based on the answer
is the unit not the answer? it does relate the slope to the total force and acceleration like asked
i disagree the answer is as simple as two words, but sure the units of the slope are part of it.
I got distracted give me a sec to read your stuff
the question right before says to calculate the slope with units
did you manage to do that one?
I have the value but I don't have the value with units
Force=?
N
Newtons
what is the unit for newtons
Newtons is the unit isn't it
did you learn SI units
is it like Jules or something
oof
Yes, but i mean, N=kg*m/s^2
ngl I don't understand what you're trying to say
,w SI units
wtf is that
I just know N what is used to measure the amount of force applied
do you know what kg, m, and s stand for here
a lot of quantities can be decomposed into these units
all*
Theres no steradian 
You're confusion me more
have you seen these units?
some of them
you have seen kg, meters, and seconds, yeah?
okay so. SI units are the international units used everywhere. We have a few base ones, like m for meter (distance), and s for seconds (time). All other units are composed of these basic units.
Force is equal to mass times acceleration. In the SI units, mass is kg, acceleration is meters per second, per second (change in velocity). So it's kg*m/s^2.
Do you understand this part?
I have to do a chore can I keep this open and come back
sure
it might close due to timeout but dont worry, u can always reopen it
Okay thanks
@sick pollen Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
are there any solutions to 2^x=-2? or for that matter any solutions for equations in the form a^x=b where a is positive and b is negative? complex included.
yes there are
how would i solve one of these? i couldnt find anything on google
rewrite -2 in complex exponential
what is a complex exponential?
e^(ix)
oh
there are no solutions in the real line
doesnt that just give numbers in a circle?
$-2=e^{x+iy}$
Element118
You need the real part to encode magnitude
it'll be easier if you write it as $-2 = re^{i\theta}$
Austrayley
Or you can write $re^{i\theta}$
Element118
so it's $e^(-2)(cosy+isiny)$?
maxtsg
it's e^-2
oh
hmm this feels gross. first convert 2^x into e^(something)
is something = x ln 2
seems good
because 2=e^ln2 and then 2^x is (e^ln2)^x=e^x ln2
so then rewrite $-2$ as $2e^{i\pi}$
Austrayley
and then you should be able to algebra it out
$e^{x ln2}=2e^{i\pi}$
maxtsg
maybe do the same thing on the right with the 2?
No
oh uh
copy your question into a free channel i dont think you can use this one anymore
New help channel please
wdym?
put it into the exponent...?
oh yeah
or like -- do you have an idea of how to solve this? if you know how already feel free to go ahead
$e^{x ln2}=e^{ln2i\pi}$
maxtsg
ok
what is an error? taking the ln of both sides?
no, the thing i put an ❌ next to
yep
so $x ln(2) = ln(2)+i\pi$
maxtsg
yeah that looks better
maxtsg
yep seems good
nice
usually written as $x = 1 + \f\pi{\ln2}i$
Austrayley

