#help-19
1 messages · Page 114 of 1
Closed by @lime swift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just making sure that x = 12 right?
from this
180-148 = 32
90-32 = 58
2 x 58 = 116
180 - 116 = 64
116 = 9x+8
108 = 9x
x = 12
can someone help with this too i got a decimal
180-112 = 68
68 x 2 = 136
180-136 = 44
90 - 44 = 46
46 = 10x+14
x = 3.2
@limpid bough Has your question been resolved?
Yes
for clarification is the distance from H to I is 2x-6? and H to J is 4
Listen IK is 12
um how
Listen from HI the dist is 2x-7
2x-6*
Ok
Ik is 3x
And Jk is 3x-2
If u subtract JK from IK
U will get IJ
2x-6 +3x = 3x-2 +4
That is IK-JK=3x-(3x-2)
yes ohh tysmm
yes
Yes
Yes to get IJ
which is -2
ohh yeah
We know HI is 2x-6
yess
So for HJ we do IJ+HI that is 2x-6+2 which is 2x-4
But it is written down that HJ is 4
We need HJ to find x
If we get x we find IK by using 3x
Like listen HJ is 2x-4 and it is given that HJ is equal to 4 so we do
2x-4=4 we get x=4
Now we can find IK
As IK=3x
So IK=3x4=12
why is it 2x-4 = 4
Bro
then how is 2x - 6 = 4 the same length
@dawn trout bro help him
help
look u need to look at it from different angle
try to find similar length
and put it equal to each other
so we put 2x - 6 - 4 over the equal sign to find x?
so like 2x - 6 = 4
guys
<@&286206848099549185>
take a look at this
THANK YOU
that makes sense now
okok tysmm
one last request
can someone check if its actually 3.2
i find it hard to believe x = 3.2
<@&286206848099549185>
I'm currently not at home
.close
Closed by @limpid bough
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
haloo
What is the question?
haloo?
Damn that's deep
@rugged escarp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me find the perimeter of this
What is the perimeter of a semi circle ?
@sage shale Has your question been resolved?
9.42?
so you would take away 9.42 4 times?
You'd multiply 9.42 by 4
and then
Then for the perimeter of the straight edges just subtract 6 from 12
Then divide by 2
And then multiply what you get with that by 8
And add that to what you got from doing this ^
why do u need todivide by two and multiply by 8?
Well you could just multiply by 4
because there are 4 sides?
Yes
so if i multiply by 4 i dont need to divide by 2 right?
Correct
ok thx sm
Your welcome
.close
Closed by @sage shale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
As Salaam Alaikum
Hello I need help with refreshing high school grade mathematics
Basically Algebra and need to learn Trigonometry better. In-Shaa'-Allah
!da2a
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
You know how to solve quadratic equations, inequalities?
To understand trigonometry understand circle and triangle
The main thing is to practice
@mystic saffron Has your question been resolved?
To give some context. I had to leave school due to illness and I am still ill. But Alhamdulillah, I am recovering. So I need to refresh cuz I don't really remember much
I need Arithmetic,Algebra and Trigonometry
I remember Arithmetic but I think I should refresh that too
That's all 🩵
Better to ask your teacher about which themes they passed
@mystic saffron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone take me through
i found my answer(2x-y)(2x+y)(4x^2+y^2)
just to clarify
apply the difference of squares a couple of times
you'd need to, yeah.
ok so ((4x)^2-y^4))
This is correct
Closed by @tidal yacht
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
isnt it the other way around?
Can you show the entire thing
are you just trying to find eigenvectors of A
not really the same thing
If you want to find eigenvectors, then you want to the find null space of $A-\lambda I$
Ari
.close
Closed by @normal sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i ask for help but its in indonesian language
In a right triangle, the length of one angle is 30°. If the length of the vertical side is 10 cm, what is the length of the hypotenuse.
this is in translate
There's insufficient information to answer this question
ikr thats why im asking because the website give answers to it but i dont understand
What's the answer it gives?
Length of hypotenuse (hypotenuse) = √(vertex side^2 + base side^2)
= √(10^2 + 10^2)
= √(100 + 100)
= √200
= 10√2 cm (answer)
That angle can't be 30
Okay they made a typo and meant 45 degrees. That's the only way
then how can if we have the 45 degrees to answer the question?
What's the other angle in the triangle if it's 45 degrees
90?
Other than that
35
Hmm? 180 - 90 - 45 = ...
Yes, the sides facing the angles will have the same length
Closed by @sleek gate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
Hi
.close
Closed by @gentle kelp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im stuck in here
i found my width and my height, but now what?
@haughty saddle Has your question been resolved?
@haughty saddle Has your question been resolved?
What did you find?
the width is 0.5, the height is f(x) 1/2.5 + 2 for the first rectangle
Ok that's correct for the first rectangle
But what would be the height in general of the i'th rectangle?
thats where i get confused
What is the x position of the right edge of the i'th rectangle?
For the 1st rectangle, it is x=2.5
its 7
No, i want a formula that works for the i'th rectangle
1st rectangle: x=2.5
2nd rectangle: x=3
3rd rectangle: x=3.5
...
i-th rectangle: x=???
0.5 times i?
Almost, but that would give x=0.5 for the first rectangle
And x=1 for rhe 2nd rectangle
And so on
its increasing by 0.5, i got that
why +2?
Because the rectangles start at x=2.5 (right edge)
So if i=1, then x=0.5×1 + 2 = 2.5
For i=2, x=0.5×2 + 2 = 3
Etc...
These all correspond to the bottom right edge of the rectangles
Then the height is easy to find because it's just f(x) with x being those bottom right positions
i still dont understand the +2
you said because the rectangle starts at 2.5. But what if the rectangle starts at 1.5?
For example for the 7th rectangle, the bottomr right corner is at x=0.5×7 + 2
ooohh
If the integration/sum starts earlier, then you would have +another number
Okay i understand that now
Now, using x=0.5 i + 2, the height of the i-th rectangle is simply f(x) = f(0.5 i + 2) = ...
im using pen and paper first, then ill write it here
Yeah np
i have this so far.... (1/0.5i + 2 ) +2
Yeahhh but those parentheses dont look too good
You should have $f(x)=\frac{1}{0.5i+2}+2$
π=√g
Now, all there's left to do is multiply the height of the i-th rectangle with it's width, and add them all together
so.. 0.5 i + 2 * 0.5?
Not really, it's $0.5 \times f(x) = 0.5 \qty(\frac{1}{0.5 i +2} + 2)$
π=√g
width × height
Distribute the 0.5, and simplify the fraction, and you'll see your answer
i dont know what is it with me, but i cant seem to simply it lol
First distribute the 0.5 to get $$0.5\times\frac{1}{0.5i+2} + 0.5\times 2 = \frac{0.5}{0.5 i+2} + 1$$
π=√g
Now multiply the numerator and denominator of the fraction by 2 to simplify it
(i.e. dividing by 0.5)
1/0.5 i + 4 + 1?
Almost, it's $$\frac{0.5\times2}{(0.5i+2)\times2} + 1 = \frac{1}{i+4}+1$$ Which gives you as final answer the sum of all rectangles $$\sum_{i=1}^{10} \frac{1}{i+4}+1$$
π=√g
@haughty saddle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
taking the usual example of the power set of naturals, the idea is that if the set were countable, then you could biject the elements of the set to the naturals: i.e. list them out
then you generate a new element of the set (via diagonalisation) that is not equal to any element in the set, showing that this listing is not a bijection since it is not surjective
the basic setup is just a proof by contradiction, and diagonalisation is used to show that your new element is distinct from any listed ones
yes, we are assuming that it is countable for a contradiction
assume that the set is countable
so you can biject to the naturals and list them out
because this is a bijection, every real number is in this list (a_i)
now construct a new real number b by taking the first digit of a_1 and adding 1 (roll to 0 if this digit is 9)
that is the first digit of b
now do the same thing, and add 1 to the second digit of a_2
this is the second digit of b
continue for the whole list
this generates a decimal number in the set
but it cannot be on the list, because it is distinct from the nth number in the nth decimal place
so the listing cannot be a bijection
@dreamy wasp Has your question been resolved?
suppose it's on the list, at position n
so b = a_n
but by construction, we picked the nth digit to be the nth digit of a_n, plus 1
so they cannot be equal at that decimal place
so b is not equal to a_n for any n
@dreamy wasp Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this trigonometry functions question.
<@&286206848099549185>
Please don't ping Helpers until 15 minutes have passed with no response
Closed by @green finch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
was gonna say
lol idk why i wrote 1 to 0
when -p+1>0 it doesnt diverge
oh
cuz the u would be in the numerator
so itll just be 0/(-p+1)
also for when p=0
you didnt do any substitution there so the bounds shouldnt change
it should still be from 1 to 2
yeah
wait wdym by this
youre saying that the integral converges when p<1 right
yeah
ah right
im just saying that when you have a positive exponent there
so including 0
so is the answer just all real numbers but 1
yeah
wait no
if -p+1<0 for say
the 0 would be in the denominator
so itll diverge
right
so just all real numbers less than 1
so the integral converges when p(1, inf)
uhh p<1 not p>1
oh '
alright tysm
yw!
@fresh sphinx Has your question been resolved?
@cold swift sorry for the ping, im trying to show as much work as i can so im showing the function behaviour as x approaches infinity and why it diverges
so i have this limit and obviously it doesnt exist but like is there any work to do to prove that or not really
cause symbolab doesnt say anything and idk either
i mean limits are intuitive so its not really necessary
ahh ln(2) is negative isn't it?
ig you can move the (ln(2))^x to the numerator and do lhopitals
ln(2) is a decimal between 0 and 1
not negative
i'm silly my b
thats true
i mean i really cba
i dont think thats the point of this question anyway
ty again
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yo
Yo
Yea
They reach home at 5
They used to reach home at 5
It means we can take that
Zuleica school gets over at 4
I feel
Cz it got one hour early
So it ended at 3
She was at station
She walked home
She would have walked for 1 hour 12 minutes
Yea
It's a ratio/proportion
Hints 33
Is the answer 72?
Wait I get it
Wilma
Left the house
And takes I say x time to reach
So she will take x time to return back
Let's say Wilma's school gets over at y
so they are saying y+2x=5 pm
Right
Now they say that once Wilma's school got over one hour early
That is y-1
Oh no
Too many distances
Does zuleica takes time to reach train station
Should I add that also
Ok see
Wilma goes to train station
Assuming it takes x time
Returns back I take it also takes x time
Zuleica school gets over at y
So we can say that
Y+2X=5 pm
Yes
Cz there is no time lag in it
It does not affect
Whether her school gets 1 hour early ober
Over* or she reaches 1 hour early
Ok if you say so
But what about that 1 hour shift
Ok if I take it as that
Ok
Sure
But it says Wilma leaves at ususal time
Usual*
Yes I said that only earlier
Listen let's say they take x time reach home
But today they reach at 4:48
That is x-12
Assuming they reach home at 5 pm
I am saying that
Let's say if Wilma takes 1 hour to get home
4-5
Now zuleica
Started walking at 3
Her mother went out at 4
3-4 she walked
This means
Aah
@dusky goblet Has your question been resolved?
@dusky goblet Has your question been resolved?
@dusky goblet still need help?
some 1 help>
?
I need help:)
@dusky goblet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys, I need help
Examine the convergence of improper integral integrated over 1 to infinity integrating the function 1/(x(1+x^2)) wrt dx
what convergence tests have you tried
the comparison test?
ok
nope
that's not what I had in mind, but alright
what I thought of was this
]
sorry 😦
both 1/x^3 and the target function are positive on [1, infty), with 1/x^3 being greater
yes
and we can see that the corresponding integral of 1/x^3 converges
integrating from sinx to cosx the function e^(-t^2)dt. finding the value of derivative of function at pi/4
not quiet sure about the approach
leibnitz rule?
isn't that like FTC part 1 and/or part 2?
what is FTC?
fundamental theorem of calculus
f(x) is result of the integration and f'(pi/4) is asked
yup
if $F(t)$ is an antiderivative for $f(t)$, then $\frac d{dx}\int_{a(x)}^{b(x)}f(t)dt=\frac d{dx}\left[F(b(x))-F(a(x))\right]$
and this is attackable
uhhhhh
Flip
that's right; I didn't compute the actual derivative on purpose
yup
yeah it works
thankfully it doesn't require information about the antiderivative of f
yup
@visual geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @visual geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is my solution correct for (b)?
@short scaffold Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@short scaffold Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
I found delta is 0.0446, but its probably just a rounding difference, seems good !
thankiess!!
.close
Closed by @short scaffold
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm having trouble on the last part
a^2-b^2=(a+b)(a-b)
Closed by @short scaffold
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this solve for x?
yes
divide both sides by 9
divide
-9/9 = -1
yes
So |(6x+1) = -1
yes
so x = 0?
Oh so the question isnt possible?
oh i can see the asnwer
its x=0
yeah
means = no sollution
xD. well thnx man. I didnt knew what to do with that 9. But now i do. Simple have to divide
.closed
.close
Closed by @sour grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whats the answer
A
Closed by @deft stump
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
alr bet
oh my pc
@sturdy galleon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know its not math but i dont have any other place to ask
I've tried everything I can think of but I cant seem to find the way to solve this. The exercise says:
The cubic thermal expansion coefficient of mercury varies with temperature (centigrade) as per the formula you see in the picture, where V_0 is the volume at t = 0°C. The mercury thermometer is calibrated in such a way that 0°C and 100°C coincide with those indicated by a perfect gas thermometer. At the temperature t = 60°C of a perfect gas thermometer, what apparent temperature can be read on the mercury thermometer?
For context, i tried to use the perfect gas law to find the expansion coefficient for a perfect gas, find the average for both the coefficients and then relate them to have the same volume change at 100°C, but somehow i always get absurd results
And the right answer should be 59.7°C
@orchid willow Has your question been resolved?
@orchid willow Has your question been resolved?
@orchid willow Has your question been resolved?
Can you show your work? I don't think the expansion coefficient for a gas matters at all, the gas thermometer is just there to tell us what temperature it is.
I think you'd just want to look at the mercury thermometer at 60°C, using the cubic thermal coefficient
Vs if you just linearly approximated between 0°C and 100°C
So basically find the volume of the mercury at 0°C, 60°C, and 100°C, and compare
I'd like to but i erased everything, what i did was found an average thermal coefficient and try to equate the "expansion" using an imaginary V0 for the perfect gas
I thought something like this but i struggle to see how to find a proper volume, or a proper average thermal expansion coefficient
I know expansion is not the right word but english is not my first language, just to clarify
Expansion is the correct word
Basically you will have to integrate the thermal expansion coefficient
(These equations are from Wikipedia)
It comes from solving this differential equation
Do you know how to solve differential equations
Yup i do know how to, but i dont know where to start with the volume
It tells you V0 is the volume
So use that
Even if you don't know the numerical value
Im sorry but Im struggling to understand something
What is it?
The book gives me the expansion coefficient function for mercury and then talks about a perfect gas, which has 1/T as the expansion coefficient function
I'm not sure it's relevant how the perfect gas thermometer works, we can just assume its measurements are accurate
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
(You forgot to reply to the bot message asking if your question was resolved)
Thanks for reopening that!
So i was saying, you said to consider the mercury at 0, 60 and 100
Yeah
Okay now
It says that the thermometer is set such that 0 and 100 are the same for mercury and for the perfect gas
So id assume that the volume inside the thermometer must be equal at that temperatures, is that so?
No, I don't think the volume of the perfect gas is relevant
Okay
I think this is just a way of saying that the 0°C and 100°C marks are accurate
And where should i get the result (i.e. 59.7) out of?
At 0°C, the mercury is at the 0°C mark, and at 100°C, the mercury is at the 100°C mark
Well did you calculate the volume of the mercury at the three temperature I said yet
At 0°C, you can assume it's some baseline volume V0
What about at 60°C?
(I haven't worked out this problem fully btw, but this seems like the most logical direction to go to me)
I would need to linearise the coefficient between 0 and 100 using the mean integral theorem, the problem in doing so is that at 60°C the volume is somewhere around 2*10^-4 the initial volume
Which is all but logical
What is the mean integral theorem?
It's just a way of finding average values of a function by integrating it
I don't understand, can you show me what you're doing
Why not just use the formula I gave you
Because the book is giving me a different function, which is not necessarily realistic but its the thing i should use in the exercise
Yup but i already have the expression of it
The point of the exercise is to consider the real behaviour of mercury
Therefore the expression is given
Yes i did
What did you get, can you show me
can you explain why you're taking the value of the cubic expansion coefficient and dividing by 100?
Wait a second
I get what you say now maybe
The reason was to find an average value between 0°C and 100°C
But i guess you wanted me to solve the differential equation for T = 60°C
Yes, I think you should calculate the value of V when t = 60°C
Okay then let me try quickly
Okay so
The result is that the volume is 0.011 the initial volume
And thats why i said before that this is all but logical
btw are you sure the answer is 59.7°C? I ended up getting 59.5°C
I'll show you what i did
okay, show me
I think you're probably just interpreting that number wrong
The book says so, might be an approximation issue
I wouldnt bother for a .2 difference
Thats what i did
Wait a second
What i got is the difference between the initial volume and the volume at 60°C
But i missed a point
So at 60°C i should have 1.011*V0
Yeah exactly, I think instead of linearizing you should do the integration though
That's what i did tho, did i miss something?
If you linearize, then your approximation will be off enough, that you'll get exactly 60°C I think
After solving the differential equation, you should get this formula
^
(But instead of alpha_V, the letter you're using is gamma)
But isnt that what i just integrated?
Hm wait I'm not exactly sure I understand what you did, what did you plug in for t here?
I mean, i managed to isolate dV, integrate both sides and find a value of V
It was from 60 to 0, because it varies with the centigrade scale
So i just used 60 in this case
oh you integrated it from 0 to 60?
From 0 to 60 sorry
Nono i just miswrote
Oh so you just plugged in t=60?
Yes
But t varies from 0 to 60 as the mercury heats up from 0 to 60, no?
Because when you take the square and the cube in the integral it varies
So now that i solved the differential and got a value for the volume at 60 i should also find a value for 100
Then linearise the volume from 0 to 100
I think you just divide the additional volume at 60 by the additional volume at 100
you should get 0.597
in other words the 59.7°C mark
oh okay I got the same, I would try dividing just the additional volumes, not the total volumes; I got 0.010937/0.018315 = 0.597...
Oh wait
Thats why
I approximated the value at 60 to 0.011
Okay i got 59.7°C
Thanks a lot!
@orchid willow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @orchid willow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
You wanna rationalise that?
hi, i've tried explaining in that channel, don't post in multiple channels and don't advertise your channel in other places
.close
yes
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
not allowed
Think of an inequality you can use to relate these two quantities
You should think of ||the power mean inequality||
Resource on this if you’re unfamiliar: ||https://brilliant.org/wiki/power-mean-qagh/||
@chilly jacinth Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @chilly jacinth
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let ABCD be a convex quadrilateral and M, N means the sides AB respectively CD. Let it be shown that the relation 4MN^2 = AD^2 + BC^2 + AC^2 + BD^2 - AB^2 - CD^2 takes place.
I applied law of cosines
in AMB, BMN, CDM, ADN
but I can't seem to get the 4MN^2 out
@blissful depot Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
help
@blissful depot Has your question been resolved?
@blissful depot Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@blissful depot Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Still need help? @blissful depot
Yes, please.
Ive gotten down to this with law of cosi es
Cosines
I think you can spam stewarts on MDC, ACB, ADB
Ill try that
Do I add them up then?
Just manipulate the equations into the desired form
We can pull out MN² from MDC
Yet I dont know about the other terms
try it
Ive gotten this
Thats not so good
I mean i can square it on rhs but it doesnt help
this
ok then just substitute and win
first simplify your equations
divide by AB
then its just algebra
Should i divide by cd in the first one?
yeah
good
This is the best form i could get it to
Ah great, i replaced with CM instead of CM²
I see
Now i just need the AB² and CD² and we're done
alr
No, ive made a mistake at common factors
Yep, it works now
Thank you @supple mural
Have a great day
.close
Closed by @blissful depot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
np
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help with this thats 19 questions long please @ me
Closed by @tame harness
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
At first glance this looks like something that you would do with mean value theorem
@heady plover Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
ok
$\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}{kx^{k-1}}$
hmm that looks like d/dx of something
um some stuff wrong
what's n doing in the sum?
and are you sure that there is an end to the sum?
what's n doing anywhere, for that matter 😁
.
nino
times x and then divide by x 
$1/(1-x^2)$
nino
ok so 1/(1-x)
still not it
listen for a sec
get out of "power series" mode
and just try to recall where you've seen kx^k-1 before
(x^k)'
but the derivative is additive
(let's just say the derivative of an infinite sum is the sum of the derivatives within the radius of convergence)
so
this sum
I don't know what type of math this is.
is the derivative of what?
are you here to help or? this kind of comment isn't helping :/
$\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}{x^{k}}$ i guess
nino
starting from both k=0 or k=1 works
You can use double $ to format it
but good choice of starting from k=0
ok
so, now back into power series mode.
What is this sum you wrote equal to?
1/(1-x)
|x|<1
exactly
this is 1/(1-x)
this is its derivative
Closed by @heady plover
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i find the average depth (question c)?
average depth would be the midline
oh so would it be 4
ye
yup
.close
Closed by @fallen sinew
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Just a question about statistics
Im not sure how to do b ii)
i get the rest
but why is the variance the same? is there some formula to use?
E(x) = 2.1
Var (x) = 1.29
E(Y) = 1.9
no Y is dropped
yeah thats what E(Y) is
yeah mb typo
no that's what Y is
E[Y] = 4-E[X] by linearity of expectation
also Var[Y] = Var[X] because generally Var[aX+b] = a^2 Var[X]
you can verify this if you havent seen it
ohhh
by just writing out the square and opening it up
we skipped that section of the book
nah its ok we are supposed to learn it for a later topic
its later in the ciriculim statement
ok
thanks tho
sure
Closed by @reef lily
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, what is the method for this question?
Let the original number of students from first year be x
Write out what those statements say in terms of algebraic equations
Solve for x
sorry but i still dont understand
Which part are you having trouble translating into equations
Go sentence by sentence
ik what the question wants
but idk how to get the total
the ratio was originally 3:10 then became 6:5 after adding 270 and 120
how am i supposed to know the original
Can you set up the equation for this?
In terms of x
3/13 x + 10/13 x = x?
What is y?
sure
the new total when 120 and 270 is added
akhh this is hurting my brain
So first sentence
How many second year students are there originally in terms of x
10/13 x
No
oh
This is how we defined x
10/3 x
right?
Correct
alright so 10/3 x is the second year and x is the first
Then what is the number of first and second years after more enter
