#help-19
1 messages · Page 82 of 1
so since that series diverges then the other one does as well?
yep since the limit approaches 1
wait how do we know it approaches 1😭
y0shi
oh we multiply it because we origionally divided by the "origional" equation?
yeah essentially keep change flip
okayyy
so
when we cancel all the terms out like 3n^2 and 2n^3 we stil have 2 left over
where would that go
y0shi
do you remember how to take the limit to infinity of a rational function?
you can totally lhopital this 3 times
but it is not necessary and requires too much time
not rlly
so if the degree of the numerator is greater than the degree of the denominator, the limit approaches infinity
if the degree of the denominator is greater than the degree of the numerator, it approaches 0
and if the degree of the numerator and the denominator are the same, the limit approaches the ratio of the coefficients of the highest degree term
OHHHHHH thatttt
this definitely something that you should try to remember since it helps a lot when computing these limits
okay i get that
so how did you get to that? by canceling out terms?
yeah 3n^2 cancels out
ohhh ur just writing that
ok nvm nvm
i was just multiplying it out first
so i had 6n^5/6n^5 +2
ah yeah either is fine
that works too
but be careful
the denominator should be 6n^5+6n^2
oh ya sorry
not that it changes the value of the limit, but if your teacher is picky it could cost you a point
all good
well the series we compared it to diverges right
that means the original series must diverge as well
oh ya the harmonic
as long as the limit evaluates to a finite positive number, both series will either diverge together or converge together
yep
ohh we determined if the origional is divergent first
then we used the limit comparison to let the series be divergent and compared to the origional?
and we did a_n /b_n
which the a_n was the one we were given and the b_n was the origional that we found?
b_n is the series we compared a_n to
and we found that b_n is divergent
and since the limit evaluates to a finite positive number, the original must also be divergent
okayyy i kinda get it now
and for the direct comparison test its kinda similar to that right
except that it has to be 0<=a_n<=b_n
yep
also the limit comparison as a few extra conditions that basically resemble the direct comparison test
but you don’t need to know them since you can just use the direct comparison when you have those conditions
okayyyy
and we do the same thing as the limit comparison and compare it to another series
and that series has to be greater than or equal to the one we have?
the limit comparison test doesn’t really care whether one series is bigger than the other
which is why it helps when the direct comparison test conditions fails
okayy i see
so do we usually use direct comparison
so the b_n in the direct comparison is what we are comparing to?
we use direct comparison when the series we are comparing to our original to converges and is bigger than the original, or when the series we are comparing to diverges and it is smaller than the original
if the series we compared our original to converges let’s say it is smaller than the original
then the direct comparison test is inconclusive
and that’s when we turn to the limit comparison
basically we use limit comparison when direct comparison fails
like when direct comparison fails?
when it doesnt fail
oh alright
like idk which one of these works with direct comaprison
i wanna pick one to try the direct comparison test with
well we usually just compare it to the highest degree term there
so $\sum \frac{1}{n^2}$
y0shi
ohhhh
so does this series converge or diverge
so we compare it to the highest degree term in the denominator?
well that would be lim n->infinity 1/n^2
which is 1/infinity
so
yeah and if there was something in the numerator
we would take the highest degree term as well
oh so how would that go
which means that the divergence test fails
like if we had n^3/ n^2+1
y0shi
but doesnt 1/infinity approach 0?
yep
and if the limit equals 0
the divergence test is inconclusive
only when the limit doesn’t equal 0 does the divergence test say that the series is divergent
yep
y0shi
doesnt that look like a p series?
yep
and now for direct comparison test
we have to check whether or not this series is bigger or smaller than our original
and since this series we compared it with is convergent, for the direct comparison test to work, we need the original to be smaller
okayyy
so we would do
1/n^2+n times n^2/1
which would be 1 bc of the limits being the same right
well thats limit comparison test
and yes it would work
but direct comparison also works
how would i do that
y0shi
the series converges?
the original converges yes
because it is less than 1/n^2
which converges
so by the direct comparison test, the original converges
so if we look at the denominators
the one on the left has a bigger denominator
if it has a bigger denominator, the overall value of the fraction would be smaller
since 1/3<1/2
yep
yw!
alright
I learned so much
🙏 better than the teacher
haha
@echo mango Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @echo mango
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with B please
i have no idea what its asking me
Draw it out
Closed by @wintry viper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
y+1=-4/3 (x-1) can someone explain how to do this
what do we need to do here?
what do u have to find in this?
or what do u have to do in this
The orginal problem is Find the equation of the line that passes through (-2,3)(1,-1)
then use the standard formula to find slope
i found the slop
then what
you might have confused between y1 and y2
ye
ok have a nice day!
@magic fox Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @magic fox
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Guys I know this is a chemistry question but I couldn't find any similar server like this. Please be kind enough to answer this T_T
Chapter: solid states
I did no ones there it's dead
What do you not understand about the question?
I got something but that's not the ans
show your working
Wait
Ok this one thing I don't get... How do we calculate for Be??
I know how to for oxide ion and Al here but there's no info for be?
i asked for your working 💀
Al is 1/4th of TV so--> 1/4(1) =1/4
O is in ccp ---> 1
Be---? If 1
Then be4AlO4
But ans is BeAl2O4
again why
2 atoms ryt?
no
no
What
lol
there are some atoms on faces too
It's not FCC tho ryt?
its CCP yeah
There are no atoms in face of CCP ryt?
there are lol
This is called FCC ryt?
Wait are FCC and CCP same??
Oh yeah I think so
both have the same structure yeah
Damn till now I was thinking CCP is same as SCC oh god
So let me try again
Ok one info was missing here Be is 1/4 of TV.
Closed by @wispy birch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
oh np 
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
helppp
i need to find the first 7 terms
what's your thought?
i have no idea how to start
try to write sqrt in terms of power indice
so like,, to the power of 1/2?
yes
okay buttt what then 😭 is there a formula or something
there is no formula, this is just multiplication with indices
show me your work and we will do this step by step
ok that's ok then, we will just do it in terms of $3\sqrt{3}$
lgkoo
it has a recursive pattern yeah
so $a_1 = \sqrt{3}$
then $a_2 = \sqrt{3 \cdot \sqrt{3}}$.
do you understand this?
I substituted n = 2
they want the first 7 terms
so a_1, a_2, ..., a_7
right
you're given a_1, and the recursive formula
where a_n is the new term, and a_n-1 is the last term
so the idea is to simply substitute the previous term into this
until you have a_7
a2 is not 3sqrt3, it is sqrt of 3sqrt3, so sqrt(3sqrt3)
but yh you get the idea
yup
okayy i need 2 more problems if you think you can help maybe 😭 sort of the same topic
just 28
right, so we have a sequence
$a_1, 10, a_3, a_4, \frac{1250}{27}, a_6, ..., a_n, ...$
lgkoo
do you know what is the property of a geometric seq?
noooo
the property of a geometric sequence is that each consecutive terms have a common ratio r
for example
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, ...
you see how each term is two times the previous term?
That means this is a geometric seq with common ratio 2
yesss right
lgkoo
yes
with this hint, can you work what the common ratio of your sequence?
well how do i find the first term
you don't need the first term
you can start from the second term
it's a common ratio
so shouldn't matter where you start if it is geometric
i.e. start from a_2 = 10
and we solve that to find r
yes, you have to come up with an equation in terms of r and solve for r
so 10 = r • a_1 ??
yes, but we don't know about a_1,
think about this
a_2 = 10
a_5 = 1250/27
so how many r did we multiply 10 by to get to 1250/27?
3?
i'm not sureeee 😭 is it 1250/27 = 10 • 3r ??
no
here's an example
b_1 = 3, b_4= 24
so to get from b_1 to b_4, we have to multiply 3 by r three times
that means
b_2 = 3*r
b_3 = 3 * r * r = 3r^2
b_3 = 3 * r * r * r = 3r^3
and b_4 = 3r^3 * 3 = 3r^4
which we know is 24
so 3r^4 = 24
and you can solve for r
does this make sense?
yes yes
now apply the same logic to this
so 10r³ ?
is it 5/3?
yes, well done
now generally even though we have this recursive formula, we can write the nth term a_n in terms of r and the first term a_1
so we know a_2 = 10, and r = 5/3, can you find a_1?
@chrome jungle Has your question been resolved?
SORRY i had to do a test on this just now 😭 but was it 6 • 5/3^n-1 ?
Closed by @chrome jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For a first order DE with dy/dx = f(x,y), df(x,y)/dy must be continuous to gurantee unique solution. Why is that not present in this definition for uniqueness of higher order DEs?
@rapid kestrel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i get help how to solve this problem?
what are guy wires?
i think they are the two blue ones on the sides going diagonal
i dont think so because it just says 2
i think the angle from the base on the left is 95 degrees and the opposite one on the right is 85 degrees because of the 5 degrees slant
ya its weird i have done similar ones before but never like this one i dont get it
and the 200ft is to the dotted line im guessin
that part im not sure because on the right it looks like its only going to the blue line (the base)
im pretty confused xd
thats the part thats weird to me too tho because if its what im thinking then you would just find the side using the law of cosines easy with a=200 and b=150 trying to find c2=a^2+b^2-2ab cos c
wait my brain doin smth
but like if the 200 goes past the base then idk
cosine rule could work
even if its a slant like that
i hate this question
can't even really tell whats what i know what u mean confusing its very badly drawn
yeah if it was like a better drawing it would make sense
look
i think i figured out the left wire
u can try to get the right one
did u get 260.25 for the left?
249.28 :/
hmm
ill send what i did
last step should be A not A^2
typo from me
based on what i did for the left wire, I literally cant do the same for the right one, so maybe i've over complicated it
can u explain to me i dont understand why its 200-150sin5
i didnt learn that in my class yet whatever that is
like how u got 150 and why its why is the 150sin5 being subtracted from 200
ya
so a bit of it is underground
sin(x) = opposite side / hypotonus side
i def spelt that wrong but i hope u get it
thats how u found the measure of the little bit thats underground like can u explain how thats done
we never did that yet
idk why i was given this problem tbh like we never learned how to do this yet only the basic law of cosines not with like a slant lmao
i mean if we assume the building is 0m wide, i could get the other wire but this seems like the question is just weird instead xd
i think i get what ur saying
only use the slope for the angle not the lengths of anything
its rigged not in my favor
ya cuz i never learned any other way to do it just if its regular
i might just put that and see if they accept it, cuz fuq
@pallid rock Has your question been resolved?
thanks
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone teach me how to do this or send me something explaining, my teacher didn’t go over this and i can’t find anything on youtube about it
I know how to find the general solution
i’m not sure what to do with the limit or what y(0) > 0 means
what is ur general solution
um
is that wrong 😭
u get this by separation
1/(a + b) is not 1/a + 1/b 
then simple integration leads to the solution
which u did
but
yeah
(also note that they talk about y(0), and that dividing by zero, as you would in 2/t^2, is not good for your health...)
I’m kinda confused on where I went wrong, was it my second step? In my first step I took the integral of 1/y^2 and got -1/y = integral of tdt which is t^2/2 + C right
It’s possible to take the reciprocal of both sides right? I just did it wrong?
yeah
oh should I combine them and then take the reciprocal
yuh
also when solving for C does it matter that I keep track of wether c is 2c or c^2 because I watched a video that said we can just make 2c = c since it's still a constant but wouldn't that affect the value of C when we solve for it since we won't be diving by two?
it wont change the final expression
just simplify till the end
and whatever constant u have
make it A or something
[though in this case, you want to have the constant in terms of y(0) if possible!]
hmm back to that, what is y(0) > 0 saying again? I dont't understand what that information is for, are they saying that y(0) can be negative or positive and we want the limit when it's positive?
That the initial value y(0), you're assuming positive (which is just as well, seeing that it's a denominator and in a square root in that sqrt{2/y(0)} part)
Closed by @outer wadi
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone just read over this and tell me if I’m wrong
Trying to just double check the original statement is
“Disprove the statement: there are two integers m>=2 and n>=1 such that m^2+1 = 2^n”
@rugged lantern Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @rugged lantern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
To keep it brief; I need to do a couple of interviews with people who have work (or have worked) as software developers or similar (Researchers (B.S-Ph.D), Web Dev, AI Devs, Data Scientists & Admins, Computer Vision Engineer, Cloud Engineers, etc....) for a sociology class I had to take to graduate. I have to ask ~20 brief questions like these:
- What kinds of things have encouraged you to stay with the ORGANIZATION NAME?
- Have you received any on-the-job training?
- How would you counsel someone on preparing for your current position at ORGANIZATION NAME?
- Are you aware of any pending laws related to labor/employment that might change your job? That is, change the relationship between you and the firm, for good or bad. If so, can you describe what those changes might be?
5) Are there any rules or policies that are specific to (Organization Name) that makes this a better (or worse) place to work than other firms who hire people to do what you do here?
Etc...
I do have to record the audio for my professor (for legitimacy purposes), so the interviews will be as brief as possible because I can listen back to the audio instead of taking notes during.
If anyone is willing to help me out, I can literally do the interview with you any day, at any time. Between April 10th and April 20th.
It would help me out a ton!
Thanks in advance.
@wanton prawn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is it 2n/n!
no
there a geometric series in a series
where is the geometric part
numerator
thats not geometric 2 4 6 8 ...
factorise it
(what if you pulled out 2 from every component of that product?)
you mean divide by 2
factorise* but no, its not just a single 2
i dont understand
first of all its 2 * 4 * 6 * 8 * 10 * 234234902394
and the denominator is a factorial
so the 2n isnt there
?
i dont know what youre talking about/what you mean
how would i factorise a series
You're happy that for each of those, they're multiples of 2 you're dealing with? That 2 is a multiple of 2, 4 is a multiple of 2, 6 is, same up to 2n?
yes
so you can factor out a 2 from each number
(2*1)*(2*2)*(2*3)*...*(2*(n-1))*(2*n)
infinite
how so?
i think youre slightly confusing the sum itself with just looking at the expression being summed
i am confused on everything
i mean the numerator
its 2 being multiplied by 2 + 2 and then multiplied by 2 + 2 + 2
if i start pulling 2's out of this
(2*1)*(2*2)*(2*3)*...*(2*(n-1))*(2*n)
itll start doing this
2 [1*(2*2)*(2*3)*...*(2*(n-1))*(2*n) ]
2^2 [1*2*(2*3)*...*(2*(n-1))*(2*n) ]
2^3 [ 1*2*3*...*(2*(n-1))*(2*n) ]
and keep going
what would be the exponent of 2 once ive taken them all out?
2^n something my brain is still processing
yup, and what would be in the square brackets?
not quite
2^n [1*2*3*...*n]
oh so youre not diving by 2
not so fast buster
gotta address this fellow
:(
n going to infinity just means there will be infinite terms thats all
but we're looking at simplifying the general form of a term
its n multiplied by every natural number less than itself
correct
WHAT
the stuff in the [] is n!
oh my god so its juist 2^n
bingo
Closed by @shrewd sky
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if you have a set of vectors and convert them to a matrix if a row of the matrix is all zeros does that mean they are linearly dependant
yeah
i dont believe so, no
no???
ooh a battle
lol its not a battle
consider the first 3 basis vectors for R4
using the standard basis
theyre LI
but youll have a row of all zeros
oh thats true
$\mqty[ \imat{3} \ 0 & 0 & 0 ]$
jan Niku
like if you have
[x x2 x3]
[x x2 X3]
[0 0 0]
yeah i was thinkin its like the one above^
if its in r3 and theirs 3
idk youd have to describe a bit more exactly what is happenin
ok wait give me one sec
im guessing its a square matrix
thats a way better explination then what i was babout to do
say its dimension n, the matrix
so the best you can hope for is the columns span R(n-1)
but, then you only need n-1 vectors to do that
so n many vectors (embedded) in R(n-1) cant be LI
maybe its easier to talk about subspaces
okay
would that mean if any of the rows are zero they are ld for a square matrix
like if the x compont was all zeors
or does it have to be the newst one
newst?
i wouldnt worry about that
it doesnt matter what row is zeros
im just trying to understand what youre asking
yea, it doesnt matter
do you understand what i mean subspace?
like, you collect these vectors as columns in a matrix
and you zero out a row
or, maybe the row is all zeros all ready
i think so its like if you have a vector space like r3 r2 is a subspace or r3 right
oh wait
yea, its like ... 'inside' R3 yea?
yes
i just think of it like sets and subsets
idk if that will hurt me but it makes the most sence to me that way
like $\mqty[ 1 & 0 & 1 \ 0 & 1 & 1 \ 0 & 0 & 0 ]$
jan Niku
the 3 vectors, assembled as columns
these vectors span a 2-dimensional subspace of r3
theyre in R3 for sure, but the subspace is only 2 dimensional
because you have a row of 0s
okok thank you
yes
but, you only need 2 vectors to make a basis for a dimensional space
yes
and in fact, you cant have more and keep them LI
so if the subspace is 2d
but we have 3 vectors in it
they cant be LI
thats all i meant
ohh yeah ok i get it now that would mean if all 3 arnt linearly dependant wich is imposible they are all linear combinations of the other two?
i think
idk what that means
$\mqty[1 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0]$
jan Niku
this could also happen
ohh then its just a line in r3?
i dont wanna say in general what you are describing is true is all
so its subspace is r1
yea
or alternatively one of the vectors is the 0 vector
but assume this screwy stuff doesnt happen
then would it just be a dot
then yes, you can always pick one, and write it as a linear combination of the others
okok thank you its all kinda starting to click now
no, i mean like $\mqty[1 & 0 & 0 \ 0 & 1 & 0 \ 0 & 0 & 0 ]$
jan Niku
oh ok thats just i hat and j hat right
we cant pick the second and third columns as a basis of the 2 dimensional subspace
it doesnt matter how many more zeros you add
do you see why?
answer: ||we cant write the first column as a linear combination of the second and third column||
yes because that would be r1?
well
like the basis vectors for r1
the first and second are LI and a basis for R2
hahaha yeah thats what i dont like about linear algebra
theirs always somthing
thank you though i understand now i think
if you can make a row of zeros you are in good shape
youre just looking at a smaller subspace
like with the row echalon form
then you need to do some investigating to figure out the size of the subspace
yea
okok so a row and a colomn of zeros are the same they can just get "thrown out" to find the sub space
sure but you dont actually need a column of zeros
and the only sub spaces are R0-RN
remember this guy
yeah ig you right
ohh okok thank you
the problem is that
if you add the first and second columns
you get the third
here we can take any two columns as a basis
but the third must be LD
yes but wouldnt that not be ref
hmm
no youre good i dont remember the precise defns of these things
i have to google
i believe it is rref
its ok
okok so just 1s and 0s
you may have like $\mqty[ 1 & 0 & 4 & 3 \ 0 & 0 & 1 & 2 ]$
jan Niku
you may have like $\mqty[ 1 & 0 & 4 & 3 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 2 ]$
okok so that would mean its a vector in r2
no this one is not square
i spans r2
so its not so clear
can i just make is square by adding two rows of 0s?
i guess
what are we talking about now, the columns?
the columns can only span a 2 dimensional subspace
$\mqty[ 1 & 0 & 4 & 3 \ 0 & 0 & 1 & 2 \ \zmat{2}{4} ]$
jan Niku
ok so would i have to cheak if the other colums are scalar multiples of eatchother
thank you god for the physics package 🙏
you dont need to check anything here there are 2 pivots
lmao yeah it looks alot better then
[x x x]
[x x x]
oh wait you right sorry
so the amount of pivots in ref is the span
or dimention
like the r
ok
then the columns span a m-dimensional subspace of Rn
okk i get it thank you very much can i write that as like this set of vectors spans Rm
for the m pivots
oh yeah ok i get that
this sentence helped alot
because the vectors will have n-many entries right
so, they cant be in Rm
(its implicit here m < n, so they have too many entries)
but you can think of the subspace as Rm inside of Rn
like you said, a plane maybe
or a line in 3d space
something like that
but the line is still in 3d space
yes ok i get it it would only be rN if its an nxn matrix where all vectors are linearly dependent
otherwise its a subspan
of a dimension
otherwise the vectors span a subspace
sorry subspace not subspan
if you have a square matrix with at least one row of all 0s
well, we can write out a nice clean defn if you want
i get the feeling youre just chasing the idea out though
i think i have it but i just dont know the termanology 100% ill give it like a very short paragraph of what i think it is
if you have an nxn matrix and all vectors are linearly independent without any zero rows these vectors will span Rn. if you take out all of the zero rows when in rref and are left with an MxN matrix the vectors span an m dimentional subspace
thats the best way i could word it
have you ever seen invertible matrix theorem?
The invertible matrix theorem is a theorem in linear algebra which gives a series of equivalent conditions for an n×n square matrix A to have an inverse. In particular, A is invertible if and only if any (and hence, all) of the following hold: 1. A is row-equivalent to the n×n identity matrix I_n. 2. A has n pivot positions. 3. The equation A...
so look at # 7
any other statement there is equivalent to # 7
I would say .... maybe 1 or 2 is what you mean?
right
equivalently
- A is row-equivalent to the nxn identity matrix
or 2. A as n pivot positions
every numbered statement here is logically equivalent
so if you have one, you have all of them
i just point you at this because this is the strongest form of the 'nice' case
where the columns span R^n
if youre not in the nice case, then your subspace has equal dimension to the number of pivots
no problem
sorry for being a lil dumb
haha dont say that
youre not dumb
you just have questions
you made it all click though wich is the important part
yeah i just feel bad cuz i dont wana wast peoples time i relly apreciate the help though i was watching youtube videos all day and nothing was making it stick
hmmmmm well if u must know
I am helping other ppl because i do not understand my own work 
hahaha what are you working on
fractional calculus 
damn that sounds a lil wacky
have you taken calculus?
i like calculus alot but i havent gotten very far
me either
just to integrals
its such a big subject
Can you take a derivative only partway? Is there any meaning to a "half-derivative"? Does such a concept even make sense? And if so, what do these fractional derivatives look like?
Previous video about Cauchy's Formula for Repeated Integration:
https://youtu.be/jNpKKDekS6k
A really nice video that derives the gamma function from scratch:
http...
if u are curious
like i know integration by parts and volume of solds of revilution stuff
but i like i like calculus alot more then linear algebra its just alot more intuitive
linear algebra is more important
damn this looks tuff
are you engineering?
nope im in com sci
lmao yeah like half of com sci is vectors and matrixes
hahaha its just so much work
yeah im trying my best but it takes a long time for me to understand the concepts but i feel like calculus just comes alot easier
wbu are you in engeneering
computational mathematics
what year are you in
im about to graduate 
AYYY nice im in second year rn so i still got a lil ways to go );
hahaha thank you its a huge help
Closed by @stiff reef
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
I need help on this
I have to prove that 3x^3 + 9x - 9x^3 is 3/2x^2(3-4x)
X is just alpha
were ookay to use x instead?
Yea
Your problem is: I have to prove $3x^3 + 9x - 9x^3 = \frac 32 x^2 (3-4x)$
jan Niku
Ye
what have you tried?
Factoring by x^2 then by 3/2 which got me close i got the 4x term but i couldn't figure out how im gonna get the 3
you know im not sure this is true
is it possible youve made a mistake somewhere?
,w plot 3x^3+9x-9x^3 and 3/2 x^2*(3-4x)
Can you tell me about where this problem came from?
I proved with integration by parts this
Want to show: $\int _0 ^a \ln(1-x) \dd x = - a^3$
jan Niku
Now im gonna use that proof to show that integral of this is this
That
3/2
Expression
Okay so if i understand
you want to otherwise assume that this is true: $$\int _0 ^a \ln (1-x) \dd x = -a^3$$
jan Niku
Yea
and You want to apply that result in order to integrate this.
Yep
so you want to calculate $$\int _0 ^a \qty( x^2 + 1 + \ln (1-x) ) \dd x$$
jan Niku
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
jan Niku
so you want to calculate $$\int _0 ^a \qty( x^2 + 1 + \ln (1-x) ) \dd x$$
Yep
then this should be $\qty( \frac{x^3}{3} + x ) \bigg \vert _0 ^a - a^3$, right?
jan Niku
Yep
this is -2/3 a^3 + a
Yep but the unit is 3cm so 3cm^2 is 9
$9 \int _0 ^a \qty( x^2 + 1 + \ln (1-x) ) \dd x = - 6 a^3 + 9a$
Multiply by 9
unit? what?
jan Niku
Yeah i mean i founs that result after
Correct
Its that but how can it be this
3/2 expression
I have to say that I don't have access to the entire problem
Maybe you are trying not overwhelm me with context?
Granted, I don't speak french!
Its just a simple integral part of the problem it's sperate
but I can't say for sure what is happening I don't have enough context
this result checks out to me
beyond that I am not sure
Yeah this is correct
If you can somehow share the entire problem
I'm lacking context to help you understand the final answer
Its in french
maybe i can find a french helper 
or translate it
chatgpt is pretty good at translation
sometimes
I can kind of read it but not really lmao
The final integral is just to find the blue part
a) "Verify that for x in [0,1], 1/(1-x) - 1 = x/(1-x)"
From 0 to alpha
were on the lower part
which part
c, I believe
Nah i wouldn't wish that on u
This is the 3cm trick
Remember the result is in cm squared
So u have to multiply by 9
Its hidden
no, this is not true
well, just hold on
i still dont understand the problem
C_f and T?
Oh you dont need to worry about that T is just a slope and cf is the graph
It wants u to find the blue area part
I showed here
but this says the region bounded by x=0 and x=a which isnt a region
what does C_f and T mean
is C f like the figure of f?
so whats f
It wants to find the area thats limited by cf which is the graph t which is the tangante and x=0 which is the origin and x= alpha which is just between 0.6 and 0.7
Its that blue part
This is f
Yes figure of f
It doesn't matter cuz the real problem is proving somehow that 3x^3 +9x -9x^3 is this
wouldnt it be the area under the curve
from x=0 to x=a
Yep
Yeah
Yeah but that has to be this
Somehow
This is last years national exam
its not lol
Bro
i mean its just not it doesnt even have the right order
So ur telling me this is not possible and that the exam that the whole country did is wrong?
Nope thats all u need to know we both came to the same expression
this function is only defined up to 1 right
Yup
so what if a>1
or T is not just 'some tangent'
A isnt > 1 because i proved this
its some function or something
Nope it is
this is a root funding problem
this changes the answer
this is what i was asking way back when
if you want to find the area between two functions
say here f and T
then you probably want to be sure sayy
f > T on [0,a]
Oh my god
and then look at $\int _0 ^a (f-T) (x) \dd x$
OH MY GOD
jan Niku
YES
this is it
youre good lol
well you want the area between the curves
so all the area up to f
but remove the area under T
(assuming f>= T)

@spring iris Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @spring iris
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would you verify this not know r?
i would do a cofactor expansion since i dont know how i would put this in my calculator
r_1 r_2 r_3 are distinct real roots, so can you just pick arbitrary r values?
tobi
for all x in the Reals
@maiden knoll Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello! I need help understanding what i am doing wrong in the next expression:
Let $ E(x) = \arcsin ( \sin (2x)) ; \forall x \in \R =>\newline
\ sin (E(x))= \sin (2x) ; \forall x \in \R <=>\newline
- \sin (E(x))= - \sin (2x) ; \forall x \in \R <=>\newline
\sin ( E(x)- \pi )= \sin (2x- \pi ) ; \forall x \in \R <=>\newline
E(x) - \pi = \arcsin(\sin(2x- \pi)) + 2k \pi ; \forall x \in \R ,; k \in \Z ; <=>\newline
E(x) = \arcsin(\sin(2x- \pi)) + \pi (2k + 1) ; \forall x \in \R ,; k \in \Z
; =>\newline
\arcsin(\sin(2x))=\arcsin(\sin(2x- \pi)) + \pi(2k+1) ; \forall x \in \R , ; k \in \Z \newline
(FALSE) $
...
huh?
Why is it not turning into latex?
$ E(x) = \arcsin ( \sin (2x)) ; \forall x \in \R =>\newline
\ sin (E(x))= \sin (2x) ; \forall x \in \R <=>\newline
\sin (E(x))= - \sin (2x) ; \forall x \in \R <=>\newline
\sin ( E(x)- \pi )= \sin (2x- \pi ) ; \forall x \in \R <=>\newline
E(x) - \pi = \arcsin(\sin(2x- \pi)) + 2k \pi ; \forall x \in \R ,; k \in \Z ; <=>\newline
E(x) = \arcsin(\sin(2x- \pi)) + \pi (2k + 1) ; \forall x \in \R ,; k \in \Z
; =>\newline
\arcsin(\sin(2x))=\arcsin(\sin(2x- \pi)) + \pi(2k+1) ; \forall x \in \R , ; k \in \Z \newline
(FALSE) $
$E(x) = \arcsin ( \sin (2x)) ; \forall x \in \R =>\newline \sin (E(x))= \sin (2x) ; \forall x \in \R <=>\newline\sin (E(x))= \sin (2x) ; \forall x \in \R <=>\newline\sin (E(x)- \pi)= \sin (2x- \pi ) ; \forall x \in \R <=>\newline E(x) - \pi = \arcsin(\sin(2x- \pi)) + 2k \pi ; \forall x \in \R ,; k \in \Z ; <=>\newline E(x) = \arcsin(\sin(2x- \pi)) + \pi (2k + 1) ; \forall x \in \R ,; k \in \Z; <=>\newline\arcsin(\sin(2x))=\arcsin(\sin(2x- \pi)) + \pi(2k+1) ; \forall x \in \R , ; k \in \Z \newline (FALSE)$

