#help-19
1 messages · Page 27 of 1
i see that
substitute n=1 to 1/3*(5/6)^n
5/18'
so to find any a in any geometric series substitute the index in
then the r is whatever is to the power of n
yes
because it's a constant to the power of variable
and the ratio of 2 consequent terms is the same
but E is a constant to the power of a variable
and also F is alternating so how can it be geometric
huh
um
ah
E is a sum
not a sequence
it's already a sum of a sequence
$(-1)^n \left(\frac{2}{5}\right)^n = \left(-\frac{2}{5}\right)^n$
artemetra
oh
A is not geometric cause the numbers dont increase by the same multiple, B is geometric with the common ratio 1/3, C is not geometric because 1/n is not constant D is geometric because it simplfies to (9/5)^n E is not geometric sequence because its a geometric sum, F is geometric because the (-1)^n combines for a common ratio of (-2/5)
@south plume
yes
how do i evaluate that limit
@south plume
it alternates between - and positive inf because 3n > 2n+1
so the limit != 0 so it diverges
how did t hey make this conclusion
@south plume
- why are you tagging me
do yo want me to not?
- idk how you learn it at your level but i personally just know that n! grows faster than 3^n
so idk how to show this
oh its a sequence not a series
no need to tag specifically me
i like u though
thank you
2n!=3.4....n
3^n/n!=2.3^n/(3.4....n)<=2(3/n)
yeah i didnt realize it was a sequence
i thought it was a series
lim r -> 2- ln|r-2|
2- gets closer and closer to 2
1.99999
1.99999-2 = -0.000001
abs avlue
0.000001
ln(0.000001) = -inf
not positive infinity
@tropic shadow Has your question been resolved?
@tropic shadow Has your question been resolved?
yes -inf is correct
Answer says inf
i can see that
@tropic shadow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tropic shadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@silent isle Has your question been resolved?
@silent isle Has your question been resolved?
@silent isle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A closure = A U L
closure is the set with its limit points yeah that's true
I think its true
[2,3] is closed
the closure of a set is always closed right
yeah
Closed by @spark cargo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to graph K in a inversely proportional equation
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
It’s not a spicfic question, I just want to know how you would Graph K on a chart
With any inversely proportional question
Okay if you need a question
"Suppose you are driving a car at a constant speed. The time it takes to travel a certain distance is inversely proportional to your speed. If it takes you 4 hours to travel 240 miles, how long would it take to travel the same distance at a speed of 60 miles per hour?"
I need help graphing that and identifying where K is on the graph
@wraith nexus Has your question been resolved?
@wraith nexus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@rugged hamlet Has your question been resolved?
@rugged hamlet Has your question been resolved?
@rugged hamlet Has your question been resolved?
@rugged hamlet Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @rugged hamlet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
got no idea where to start
find the line:
argz = pi/3
thats just the ray at angle π/3 from origin right
what do i do w the info tho
is it √3 cis π/3
√3 isnt the length tho
not sure mate
<@&286206848099549185>
There is an equilateral triangle, how to find the length of the segment from the corner to a random point on the other side?
@rancid basin Has your question been resolved?
ik that π/3 are the interior angles of an eq. triangle
but how does that help with the length
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do we get from the top to the very bottom?
I understand that we derive it
but then? How do we go from that long line to the short line
wdym ignore
I derive the top one
then get the whole 4(x-2)...
then I don't know how to get from the second to the third line
from second line to thrid you factor (x-2)
I thought about that but I didn't know how I'd do it
for me I didn't do the same as the top line
I had (x-2)^2 * (4x-2)
show your work
so I got 2(X-2) * (4x-2) + 4(x-2)^2
it's correct
hm
just factor (x-2)
I don't get the same as the solution sheet
if I factor out (x-2) then I get 2*(x-1) + 4(x-2)
because the (x-2) is squared
2*(x-1)?
yea
how
(x-2)^2 no?
correct
but when I factor with something don't I have to include that something somewhere?
like if I factor with (X-2) shouldn't there be an (x-2) somewhere
ab + ac = a * (b+c)
so the a is still there for example
wait so 2(x-2)(4x-2) turns into (x-2) (2*4)?
@tardy lagoon I get (x-2) * 8 + 4 (x-2)
???
what
this
how'd it become this
but this isn't what the book got either
it's the same after simplifying
because of the (x-2)
there's 2(x-2)*(4x-2)
so if I take out the (x-2) it becomes (x-2) * 2 * 4
no?
but that's not factoring anymore
how do I just "take it out"
idk if there's some language barrier here or something but that's not what I imagine under factoring
when factoring you have ab+ac=a(b+c)
I'm saying 2(x-2)(4x-2) is ab here
factor out (x-2) being a
we're left with 2(4x-2) which is b
yes that's (b+c)
(x-2)(12x-12)
last step factor out 12
(x-2)12(x-1)
12(x-2)(x-1)
sometimes when I'm lazy
so cursed
that's acceptable
my teacher didn't like it very much
when you have a varaible
alphabetically or whatever
my issue is honestly just with the small stuff
like I get the whole derivation thing
then I get stuck on the factoring
do you have any tips on how to fix that
when you can do calculus but not basic algebra
I still have today, tomorrow, saturday and sunday
suffering from success
exam's on monday so there is still hope
I just need to know what to practice
practice factoring polynomial
noted
wait let
let's try getting the third derivation
it's also necessary
12(x-2)(x-1)
I'd personally unfactor here
wait small question
if I wanted to do 12 * (x-2)
would I write 12x-24 in parenthesis or without
with
What's the rule behind that
when do I put parenthesis and when do I not
associativity
which means?
when multiplying a,b and c we write abc
but technically it's kinda abusing notation
rigorously we either have (ab)c or a(bc)
but since (ab)c=a(bc) we just write abc instea
d
associativity basically means the order of multiplying doesn't matter
ah
so technically there are always parenthesis
yes
thank you
when doing the third derivative I get (12x-24)(12x-12)
which is 12((x-2)+(x-1)) right
NO
noooo
what
and (12x-12) into 12(x-1)
^
great
idk
I tried summing it all up under one
ig not
why does that not work though
would it not just turn into 12(x-2)+12(x-1)?
idk why you think 12(x-2)(x-1)=12((x-2)+(x-1))
if I put 12((x-2)+(x-1))
no with another parenthesis
yeah
mb
I just misunderstood
hmm
I'm going to now take a shower then redo the whole thing from the beginning and I am hoping that it'll be right from the first try
what's up?
you're still wrong though
wait how
this is correct
not this
but I got that from this
wut
(12x-24)(12x-12) turns into 12((x-2)+(x-1)) when I factor 12 out
or just 12(x-2)+12(x-1)
same thing
how'd you get the correct result while being completely wrong
I'm not wrong tho
the book has the same thing I think
what was the second derivative again
(12x-24)(12x-12)=12(x-2)(12x-12)=144(x-2)(x-1)
wtf
12(x-2)(12x-12)'
now say I want the derivative of this
waht I did was "unfactor"
to (12x-24)(12x-12)
because I wanted to just use one product rule
and not a chain rule
if I'd kept 12(x-2) I'd need to do u(x)=12x and v(x)=x-2
ahh
and I didn't wanna do that
then the whole u'(v(x)) * v'(x) thing
just too much unnecessary work
so then I got (12x-24)(12x-12)
and did the whole u'(x)*v(x) + u(x)v'(x)
(12x-24) (12) + (12x-12) (12)
wait one sec no I didn't do that
let me look back at my notes
but the second derivative is 12(x-2)(x-1)
was it?
I forgot to highlight it on my tablet
so now it's stuck in a mess of god knows what
then I did (12x-24)(x-1)
yeah that makes more sense
(12x-24)*1 + 12 (x-1)
yeahhh
see
that's how I got there
so then I got to (12x-24) + (12x-12)
and from there I went on to do 12((x-2)+(x-1)) aka 12(x-2)+12(x-1)
any problem with any of that?
ok now this is correct
yea I had the wrong derivative lol
but this is what I did
and the 12((x-2)+(x-1)) = 12(x-2)+12(x-1) thing is correct right
yes
great
now I can actually do the goddamn exercise
of finding turning points and local maximum/minimums
no problem
.close
Closed by @torn swan
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, sorry but I'm really lost with proving this exercise. Can't I just say that as the semi-infinite binarysequence are uncountable, it implicates that this set is uncountable as well?
@rocky juniper Has your question been resolved?
Or can you just help me with how the functions look like? Are there only two functions because of {0,1}?
@rocky juniper Has your question been resolved?
it would work saying that ${0,1}^\infty$ is uncountable, as then the amount of possibilities $f(0)$ can be is already uncountable
rafilou2003
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Just learned the concept of "at least one" probability. And was told the formula is P(at least one)=1-P(none)
Can i interpret "none" as complement of A ?
P( at least 1 A)=1-P(all possible A' )
@karmic girder Has your question been resolved?
event A
ah ok, ty!
it's more natural to think that P(A)=1-P(complement of A)
yeah i know this, but when an "at least" probability problems come up, i got kinda confused
thats why i asked if i can think of it this way to help me remember it more intuitively, instead of just using the formula
The complement of "at least n" would be "strictly fewer than n"
I see
In the case of n=1, that's just "none"
like 0 n?
yeah it's better to learn taking complement
It can be half
No n is a number not an event
oh
instead of at least one A, think of it as A happened at least once
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi what would be the best way to solve system of equations with 3 unknowns?
Elimination
Can anyone provide any good tutorial?
So elimination method is the easiest?
For systems of 3, the method which is most elementary and efficient, elimination is your best bet, yes
ok so do I have to learn how to solve with 2 unknowns first?
if yes, what would be the best way to do it?
@proper quail Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @proper quail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
idk what i screwed up, can someone solve this and explain
I just mutliplied (1+root3+root5) to the LHS
<@&286206848099549185>
This has infinite solutions
The kernel is dim 3
One equation of 4 variables is not enough for a specific solution
he's got the pre-uni role
Shoot
don't you talk about linear forms like he'll understand
idk how to find the right answer w/o row reduction
his method looked sound
oh it's a she
… ah it’s a gimmick problem then? ie the method only works on this specific one?
idk
It could have been they're looking for integer solutions but the answers don't match that
,w expand (1+sqrt(3)+sqrt(5))(P+sqrt(3)Q+sqrt(5)R+sqrt(15)S)
we want that to equal 1
… I truly see no way other than linalg
it's (P+3Q+5R) + (P+Q+5S)sqrt(3) + (P+R+3S)sqrt(5) + (Q+R+S)sqrt(15) = 1
then just linalg this 
That’s the same equation as you started with silly
except I can turn this into a simple equation
Oh?
By saying I hope for a solution of the form 1 + 0 + 0 + 0
,w solve ((1, 3, 5, 0), (1, 1, 0, 5), (1, 0, 1, 3), (0, 1, 1, 1))(a, b, c, d) = (1, 0, 0, 0)
rip
You take the conjugate in Z[sqrt15] ?
Because answers are rational I assume
time to use Galois theory to figure out how to rationalize fractions
is that just 1 - sqrt(3) - sqrt(5) ?
or do you have to multiply by all 3 conjugates then ?
All three
dammit
afaik?
(1+sqrt(3)+sqrt(5)(1-sqrt3-sqrt5) = 1-(sqrt3+sqrt5)²
isn't that literally the original problem ?
what
to do this
but you have pqrs now
but neither is algebra in Z(sqrt(3), sqrt(5))
= Q[sqrt(3), sqrt(5)] ? When is a field extension a field ?
I hate your sqrt notation but thank you
No @spiral basalt bc we assume rational coeffs so we just take 3/11 as sqrt3’s coeff = Qfor instance
Then sum all
so we don't have equality ?
@weak portal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there a trigometric identity 1- cosx or 1 + cosx?
Hi!
By formula ,
Cos(A) - cos(B) =2{sin(A+B)/2}.{sin (B-A)/2}
1-cos(x) = 2{sin(0+x)/2}.{sin(x-0)/2}
1- cos(x) = 2sin(x/2).Sin(x/2)
1-cos(x) = 2sin^2(x/2)
= 2sin^2(x/2)
Do the same thing for 1 + cosx
@slender solstice Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello?
I'm in the middle of reconstructing a rational function and I'm unsure about the significance of a constant in the numberator
yea so? its a constant whats wrong?
It's because I have to reconstruct the constant in order to graph the funtcion
Well it is most definitely important since you are asking about its significance
Well you simplified incorrectly.
You get (x+3) * (x-2) in the denominator
and (x+3) cancel out, not (x-3)
So the new numerator is -3(x-3)?
Yes
Ok
And then when I divide the numerator do I redistribute the -3?
Or does it become a parameter?
USS-Enterprise
Yeah
And then I have to rewrite it in this format
By using long division
Because I still need to find vertical and horizontal asymptotes
.stop
.closd
.close
Closed by @slow crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
from here i guess
do you know how to rationalise the denominator?
I mean, I don't get exactly what I've to rationalise, the original RHS of the question?
yes. denominator of the RHS
Alright, what's the next step?
what did you get for it? (the rationalised RHS)
well, show your work
Ok, one min
How do I type it out here
well, just write out what you get as values of P,Q,R,S
1-root3-root5/-7+2rooot15
$\frac{NUMERATOR}{DENOMINATOR}$
^
ok now rationalise it completely
k
the root15 is still in the denominator
one min
Okay, seems like I'm too used to LaTeX
k got rid of it
got 11 in the denominator
i think i can simplify the numerrator
I will do that
good good
ok so idk how to use latex yet
no worries
ill type it out normally
yep
hooray
ok so we can rewrite that...
we have
[1P + \sqrt{3}Q + \sqrt{5}R+\sqrt{15}S=\frac{7+3\sqrt{3}-\sqrt{5}+2\sqrt{15}}{11}]
Astral
do you have any idea how to solve for rational PQRS from here? (I say rational bc otherwise we're back where we started, with infinite solutions)
hint: ||compare coefficients||
no
this is ostensibly our last step before getting the values
let's put it this way
what rational values of P will let it be $k\sqrt{3}$ for rational k
Astral
(rational is just a fraction)
so sqrt(3) is irrational, but 12312/238479812 is rational, as is 1/2 or 2/1 or 3
P cannot "contribute" to the square root terms
because it cannot be irrational, and its coefficient is 1
so now matter what P is, it will never help sqrt(3)Q becomes 3sqrt(3)/11
but we need the other 3 to be rational
[1P + \sqrt{3}Q + \sqrt{5}R+\sqrt{15}S=1\frac{7}{11}+\sqrt{3}\frac{3}{11}+\sqrt{5}\frac{-1}{11}+\sqrt{15}\frac{2}{11}]
lemme write it this way
Astral
oh so Q is 3/11
all I did was separate the numerator into different fractions
ok, so you see the patterns yes?
and I just add them up
but do you know why it's the solution?
It's rational?
I mean yes
but like,
do you know why P can only contribute to the "1" term, and not the sqrt(3) or sqrt(5) or sqrt(15) terms?
why Q cannot contribute to the "1" sqrt(5) or sqrt(15) terms?
cuz if u multiply a constant by root 3 ull get smth irrational?
product of a rational number and irrational number?
only if u multiply with that exact root will u get a value corresponding?
the value of P cannot be irrational, similarly value of Q can't be a something of a prooduct of root5 or root15
yes! you can multiply 1 by an irrational number like root 3 to make 1(k) irrational! But in this case, 1P can never be irrational because P is rational
if P was irrational, again, infinite solutions, it's out of scope for your level of the problem
yes exactly
you seem to understand
:D thank you so much for the help
you'll see more of this concept in partial fraction decomposition
which solution did you pick? (ABCD?)
I didn't understand what you mean?
in your original question
ah ok
I spent about an hour on it
it happens
But I could not understand how to solve it
.... though looking back when I sum PQRS I get 1....? 11/11
idk lol
the process was correct
unless there are infinite solutions 😭
I will add it up and check, its quite likely the question is wrong, Ill just ask my teacher to show me the correct answer and how they got it
The answer 1 should be correct right?
I'll be honest the sum should be 11/11=1, which doesn't correspond to any of the provided answers 😭
why would it be likely the question is wrong?
I found 2 more errors on the same paper (was a science +math paper)
I will resolve it, perhaps the rationalisation may have been wrong
I don't think so, we got the same answer independently
But if it's the same, it's prolly the question
alr thanks a lot for the help, really appreciate it
no problem!
distracted me from my lectures which is good
never calculate the jacobian of a spherical function in cartesian coords plz
it's not worth it
lmao ill understand that in a few years or months I hope
,close
.closse
.close
Closed by @weak portal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Using the arc length formula and integral
Algebra and integrating
Now what do i do
What does the question mean by find all of f(x)?
you missed a constant of integration here
once you include that, that'll be "all f(x)"
@plain pendant Has your question been resolved?
ah good point
can you explain to me how this works?
is this right/.
riemann
(\int dx = x + c) also right
hamr
correct
so what is the full equation? can you explain how the equation could be used to find all f(x) that satisfy the requirements?
use this before you sub back in for y
instead of " =u" should be "= u + C"
( = u + c = arcosh(y) + c)
hamr
im confused?
why
How does this euqation define all f(x) that satisfy the constraints?
what even is the full equation
i don't see the word constraint there
properties
the properties are the constraints i mean
f(x) has a property that area under curve is euqal to length of curve
and there are infinite f(x) that have this property
the goal is to find an equation that helps us find these f(x)?
yes this +C makes there infinitely many
yes i thought you did that with your integral
isn't this your work
@plain pendant Has your question been resolved?
It's, in fact, been 2040 seconds
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello how can I evaluate the following it's either telescoping or geometric
@clear tree Has your question been resolved?
For compact two-dimensional surfaces without boundaries, if each loop can be continuously compressed to a point, then the surface is topologically homeomorphic to a 2-sphere (usually just called a sphere). The Poincaré Conjecture, proven by Grigori Perelmán, states that the same is true for three-dimensional spaces.
Someone to solve it
@wooden python
$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{3^{2n-1}}{4^{2n+2}} - \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{2^{3n}}{4^{2n+2}}$
Or ratio test?
Ann
ratio test only tests convergence, it tells you nothing of the value
you can take my word that both these series converge, or apply the ratio test yourself to establish the same -- but applying ratio test to a geometric series is a bit silly.
But the thing is I don't know how to solve this geometric serie
.
what is $\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} ar^n$?
Ann
a geometric serie
no, what is its value
Yes
both my series can be rewritten into the same firm
form*
think about how
i know you are able to do it
2^3n can be rewritten as (2^3)^n
keep thinking in that direction.
i don't rly want to hold your hand all throughout here.
@clear tree Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @clear tree
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this correct mathematical notation?
yes
well you arent doing row operations here
@gleaming wharf Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @gleaming wharf
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
he wrote 12cosx = 5sinx but when he get to the dividing he wrote the opposite
why?
also, how he decided to put 5-12-13 at which part of triangle?
what do you mean?
if 12cos=5sin
12=5sin/cos
12/5=sin/cos
sin/cos = tan
if tan=12/5 then 12 is the opposite and 5 is the adjacent
the 13 as the hypotenuse can then just be found by pythagoras
he wrote sin=12 and cos=5
but at the start he wrote sin=5 and cos=12
show me, because sin=12 and cos=5 is impossible
sin and cos are bounded by -1 and 1
so you must be misunderstanding something
yes im talking about that
it means the ratio of them is 12/5
thats like saying 5/6=30/36 means 5=30 and 6=36
doesnt work that way
so, he can also write like sin/cos=5/12 right?
yes thats the same equation as i showed here
Closed by @vague shard
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, I don't understand the exercise 3, how can I calculate the distance from a point to a function
@tepid spear Has your question been resolved?
Better question, how can I calculate the minimum distance of a point to a function?
<@&286206848099549185> maybe
@tepid spear Has your question been resolved?
does the task require to find minimum distance from point P to the point on 2(1-x)(x+2)?
@tepid spear Has your question been resolved?
think about the distance formula between two points, and how a point on a function can be described
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is just very confusing to me. Geometry is not my strong point at all
@stiff pewter Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
My math question is simple: I want to know if a table of values is correct or not. A teacher presented me with a table of (x,y) values that looks like this: (0,1) (1,4) (2,10)(3,20)(4,35). This to me appears immediately to be a tetrahedral function/sum of triangular numbers. y=1/6x(x+1)(x+2). Simple. However, of course, a true tetrahedral would have a slightly transposed table of values: (0,0)(1,1)(2,4)(3,10)(5,20)(6,35) etc. So what's up? Did the teacher just mistype the list of values or do I need to figure out a different function? This is just precalc, nothing fancy.
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
Wait, I'm confused. Why did I get put in this channel with a new question if someone is here qith a question already?
?
Oh, hello! Can you help me?
I don't mean to bother anyone. I'm just a little baffled by this discord.
Oh oops sorry lol I didn’t notice the channel name lol
Oh
well, can anyone help me with my question: I want to know if a table of values is correct or not. A teacher presented me with a table of (x,y) values that looks like this: (0,1) (1,4) (2,10)(3,20)(4,35). This to me appears immediately to be a tetrahedral function/sum of triangular numbers. y=1/6x(x+1)(x+2). Simple. However, of course, a true tetrahedral would have a slightly transposed table of values: (0,0)(1,1)(2,4)(3,10)(5,20)(6,35) etc. So what's up? Did the teacher just mistype the list of values or do I need to figure out a different function? This is just precalc, nothing fancy.
This one is confusing lol this is a guess but could it be shifted or stretched. I’m not sure to be exact lol
it can't be shifted or stretched, because the output for x=0 would still be y=0 given any difference in coefficient. And if a constant were added it would alter the whole function.
I think the teacher made a mistake!
THANK YOU for your help 🙂
Yeah true lol
@sand zephyr Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A 240 pF planar capacitor with distance of 0.2mm, find the area.
I keep getting the answer of 5.42 but the answer is 54.21
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
I have C and d over E but when i calculate it, it gives me like 5.4 and when i convert to cm, it doesnt not give me 54, and the answer is supposed to be 54 in cm
You forgot to change the unit of distance to SI unit.
It's in mm. You are supposed to put in metre.
so 0.0002?
Yes
it gave me 0.00542
,w 240 * 10^(-12) * 0.2 * 10^(-3) /(8.85 * 10^(-12))
That seems correct.
Also, what you have gotten is in m^2. Convert to cm^2. It's same.
ohh i see
thank you
i was converting m to cm and not m^2 to cm^2
thank you so much, have a nice rest of your day
.close
Closed by @vast pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why is it n^3?
what's T(n)?
T(n) = T(n-2) +n^2
oh
what part are you confused abt ?
how the summations are \theta(n^3)
the first summation gives $\frac{n^3}{2}$, so obviously it's $\Theta(n^3)$
for the second, you have $4n \sum_{i=0}^{n/2}i = 4n\frac{(\frac{n}{2})(\frac{n}{2}+1)}{2}$, so that's also $\Theta(n^3)$
for the third, use the formula for the sum of squares $4\sum_{i=0}^{n/2}i^2 = \frac{(\frac{n}{2})(\frac{n}{2}+1)(n+1)}{6}$
oh ye
@gaunt stratus
oh
aPlatypus
why is it theta and not big o?
they all have a non-zero n^3 coefficient here
so they're all bounded below by a constant multiple of n^3
oh because it grows faster than n^3?
big o would be n^4?
nvm
thanks for the answer how do i end this?
no big theta means you have roughly the same order of growth as n^3
being bounded above and below by constant multiples of n^3
that's what being theta(n^3) means
because that is the best case right?
wdym?
big omega is the lower bound so the best case
ok thanks makes sense now 🙂
but you could also say n^3 is big omega n^2 if you want
the bound doesn't have to be tight
uh
time to revise your big O etc... notations then
oh because big omega is just at least as fast right?
yes
Closed by @gaunt stratus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain how to solve this problem
Consider the figure below. Find an expression for the maximum value of teta such that the person does not slip.
so that the person does not slip.
Here is the translation
is the coefficient of friction given?
Nope
I suppose that we should find all the forces that are applied to the body and then equal it to zero
Ff + Fn + Fp = 0
And then make protections to ox and oy
Ffx+ Fnx = 0 and Ffy - Fpy - Fny = 0
But I don’t know what I should do next
@leaden light Has your question been resolved?
@leaden light Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would you prove n−(m+k)=(n−m)−k.
Like, I know It is true and I can substitute these with numbers and solve it and it will be equal. But, how do I actually go about proving it.
ps, very noob here, be gentle.
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
what are n, m, k here ?
They are arbitrary, could be any number.
yeah but what type of number
natural numbers
natural, integer, ...
well you'd need some kind of definition of natural numbers
otherwise you can't really prove stuff
you can look into the peano axioms for example
I am following a specific youtube playlist and it is building numbers from string of ones to roman then into hindu.
At this stage, Natural numbers are a string of I's. I, II, III, IIII, IIIII etc. S(n) = N + I ==> S(I) = I + I = II, or S(II) = II + I = III
and if you want something more guided, the first few chapters of Tao's Analysis 1 go through the construction of natural numbers, integers, rationals, real numbers, ...
I am not that good with Math to learn analysis. Does what I told above helps? I don't think this question is supposed to be something advanced. I somehow need to prove using what I have been taught in previous lectures. In lectures, author has developed, natural numbers, addition, multiplications and their laws.
But, I am unable to prove this using the things I have learned up until now.
I guess I will re-watch the videos where author proved laws of addition and multiplication. Maybe, that will give me a hint.
what I'm saying is the first few chapters of Tao aren't analysis in a strict sense
it's just constructing numbers
Alright, I will take a look.
<@&286206848099549185> please look at pinned message.
@dreamy escarp Has your question been resolved?
@dreamy escarp Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I'm having a hard time with this question. I understand formula for Variance and that our expectations in this case just our mean but how do go about finding E(X).
riemann
How am I supposed to find the Z-score when I don't have X?
you know the form of X
"normal rv with mean 5, ..."
I don't know how I'm supposed to get X just from that information.
you don't need to get X
you just need var(X)
Var(X) = E(X^2)-u^2 right?
yes but that's not useful here
you keep sigma as a variable after this step
That's the only formula for Variance I know
riemann
Var(x) = omega^2 is this the one I'm supposed to use?
the variable name is sigma, not omega
Sorry I meant sigma.
Okay but if Z= (X-u)/sigma
I still have X as an unknown.
I'm sorry if being dumb but I don't get how I can do this without X
If I keep sigma as a variable, the most I get is -0.84= X-5/sigma.
this is incorrect
X isn't a single value, it's a r.v.
your first step should be P(X-mu > 9 - mu) = 0.2
I don't get it.
I don't have the random variables. I just know that P(X>9)=0.2
And the mean is 5
I don't know how to use that in the formula for the Z-score
yes from here
you can subtract something from both sides of the inequality to get this
You don't work with X directly like this, you need to work with probabilities of X
@humble meadow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @humble meadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello! How would I go about solving this problem? I don't know what the professor is asking for here, as the plot of a real function in the complex plane.. would just be dots on the horizontal(Real) line, right?
@molten bough Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what is difference between matrix and determinant
I have to calculate inverse matrix 3x3
how I can do that and why is it different than calculating determinant
they look almost the same
a matrix is a collection of elements (here numbers) arranged in rows and/or columns, the rows all have the same length.
The determinant is a function that inputs a SQUARE matrix and outputs a single number
Ok so when I calculate determinant i get single number
but how I can calculate matrix 3x3?
I can't find a good tutorial on that
You have 2 ways that I know are easy
A = | a b c |
| d e f |
| g h i |
u can find the inverse of A like this:
A⁻¹ = (1/det(A)) * adj(A)
wait wait
so to calculate inverse matrix
i have to calculate determinant first right?
yes
well...
Ok because we did that in class
A⁻¹ = (1/det(A)) * adj(A)
i don't understand this
what is adj?
Adjugate matrix which is done finding the determinants of the minor matrices
But
Let's not do that
Here's an easier way
so your matrix is
a b c
d e f
g h i
u know the "de morgan's rules" ?
We'll write a second matrix on the right, which is Identity
exactly ..
a b c | 1 0 0
d e f | 0 1 0
g h i | 0 0 1
Now, your job is to row reduce echelon the matrix on the left
What is the second derivative for x^2+y^2=2xy
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
open ur channel..
and its depends on which u need y or x
is some standard i will always use?
