#help-17
1 messages · Page 302 of 1
we don't
what if epsilon/6 was smaller
we're choosing delta
delta isn't a fixed value
we can just pick some delta <= epsilon/6
its never a problem
so we just WANT delta to be equal or less than epsilon/6
cuz we want a smaller delta?
yes
we want the delta to be as small as possible
small enough to...
meet your enemy's challenge
cuz our enemy wont like it if we have a big delta
yeah
cuz its cheaty
if you say that |f(x) - L| < epsilon when |x-a| < 0.1 for example
then it will still work when |x-a| < 0.01
because you're even closer to a
so if you find one delta that works
then any smaller delta will also work
so lemmeget this straight
rn we know that |x+1|<epsilon/6
this is a fact
we also know that |x+1|<delta
no that was a goal
yes
what does epsilon/6 really tell us then
the original goal is |(x+1)(x-3)| < epsilon
we converted that to 6|x+1| < epsilon by making delta <= 2
now this is the same as asking for |x+1| < epsilon/6
so our goal is |x+1| < epsilon/6
so epsilon/6 is really only assuming that delta is equal or smaller than 2
so what can we do with this assumption
rn assuming delta <=2, |x+1|< e/6
what is our goal
rn
|x+1| < epsilon/6
so our goal is to prove that true?
yes
how can we prove that true
known: delta <= 2
|x+1| < delta
|x+1| < 2
|x-3| < 6
goal: |x+1| < epsilon/6
we select delta <= epsilon/6
okay
delta is in our control, its perfectly fine to declare that
but say this
say epsilon is freakishly massive
like 10000
how would delta only be less than or equal to 2 in our function
we just pick it to be
theres no requirement on delta other than for |(x+1)(x-3)| < epsilon
so delta can be <= 2
but like
on a graph how can that be true?
visualized
with such a massive epsilon wouldnt the delta also be massive
these values are all within 10000 distance of 0
if your enemy gives you a large value of epsilon, you should be happy
because some tiny value of delta will probably just work
so delta is, in our terms, 2. from a which is -1, so we can pick any x value between -3 and 1
yes
the epsilon is the distance from the limit of the function at -1
yes
so if you want your function to be < 10000 distance away from the limit
well
thats not a very strict requirement is it
10000 is huge
just stay close to -1, and you're g
ok right so actually a massive epsilon is a good thing for a delta cuz that means it covers a larger amount of the functioin
the line of the graph
if it was a tiny epsilon
that means a very small portion or even no part of the function is captured?
or actually
u cant have no part of the function
well if you're trying to do a limit proof, you need to be able to produce a delta
otherwise you won't be able to complete the proof
and why cant delta be larger than e/6
is it cuz our enemy is like
fuck you
thats not dfair
|x+1||x-3| could exceed epsilon if we're not careful
that would be bad
because you don't want to stray too far
epsilon is the limit to how far you can move around
oh we want to stay in the confines of the epsilon space
delta is the number such that |x+1| < delta
so |x+1| < delta <= epsilon/6
which achieves the goal
|x+1|<delta<=e/6
right
so delta has gotta be bigger than |x+1| whilst also being smaller or equal to e/6
i mean
thats kinda the wrong way to think about it
|x+1| has to be smaller than delta
delta is a constant that we pick
x is the thing thats varying
alr
ok we
gotta hurry
i got 3 homeworks due
fuck
alright shit
whats next
we're done basically
to summarise
recall that we needed delta <= 2
and also delta <= epsilon/6
so one such choice of delta that satisfies these requirements is delta = min{2, epsilon/6}
the lesser of the two numbers
delta works for both <=2 in satisfying the proof as well as e/6
and delta given whatever the epsilon value truly is is going to be at most 2
yes
yes
exactly
this is what your thing did
but using delta <= 1 instead of delta <= 2
so picking a smaller number generally = better?
theres no single "answer" for delta
not really
1 is just an easy number to work with
but as we just saw, 2 also works just as well
what is the definition of delta
wow, I can't believe you're pre-university and learning straight up analysis
that's insane
what is analysis
is this what analysis is
im in calculus 1
idk if this is like
super easy or what
well, it's a topic taught in analysis courses usually
for calculus people
im 1 chapteri nto calculus
it hasnt even been a full month
since we started
it's a field of math, and its introductory principles are often taught in analysis/real analysis courses
and I'm surprised to see you being made to learn it in calc 1
because it's a hard topic
so to summarize this whole process we wanna prove that |fx-l|<epsilon and |x-a|<delta, i assume that delta is going to be 2 so i find the boundaries of |x-a| given that delta value and use the values given by thiose boundaries to find the maximum value possible for |f(x)-l|<epsilon to be true given my delta. knowing the maximum possible value given delta=2, that maximum possible value must still be less than epsilon for my proof to be true. i used algebra to find the epsilon value that confirms the proof so now i know that our delta is either going to be at most 2 or at moste/6
ok im glad people see this as a hard topic
cause
im ngl
im about to break my monitor
but also I hate how they don't seem to use quantifiers
quantifiers make the definition of a limit way easier to understand
especially becausr the textbook did NOT
explain this at all
it literally just threw it at me
the only 'explanation' given was a definition or two and the examples
lmaoooo
with shitty expkanations
sometimes in life, you have to develop your own intuition
a textbook cant handhold you through everything
to be fair, most analysis courses go into a lot more and deeper with limits and continuity, but still, it's impressive to see it being in your calc 1 course
ah, let me see if I can find a good explanation
can somebody ans me
ans
I really like this definition from taylor's book on 1v analysis
specifically, 3.1.2
it's a little too general
but take $d_{something}(x, y)$ to mean $|x-y|$
if it's continuous at a point x, the limit exists at x
(not exactly exactly true, but pedants, pls allow me to be a little lax for pedagogical purposes...)
00100000
@compact eagle Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @compact eagle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
??
Happy Holi everyone 🎉🥳
Can I ask questions regarding Statics?
idk what holi is, but happy holi to you too
do you have a question?
Its the festival of colours , representing victory of good over evil
How does one treat this UDL extending on angle member?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
oh sorry, Im on the wrong chat
i see. but this is not the place for casual conversations, if you don't have questions we can help with, then please close this channel
I actually have a question, just give me a minute
@digital aurora Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi im confused with solving this graphically for acd. when looking for solution(s), i know that it is where two functions intersect. B worked but acd gives me ---=0. does this mean i could just use the x-int as my solutions, as solutions sometimes mean the x-int?
How do you mean "acd gives me ---=0"? Can you show what you plotted?
oh questions A, C, D
so like as an example
when algebraically solved question A, it was x=11 in the end
that sounds kinda sus
11 is not a solution of equation a). you messed up for sure. show your work
3x+5x(x-2)=x+4
3x+5x^2-10x=x+4
??
oh i messed up the next line
i think
idk why i got 3x^2
so far so good based on what you've typed
ah.
ok ill cont
still don't know what ---=0 is supposed to mean tho
3x+5x^2-10x=x+4
--- was just any random equation
??why did i do smth
(If you're doing it graphically, then as you mentioned, are you not looking for where the two functions intersect? Hence why I asked for what you graphed, so we could see what you did)
e.g. for a), you want to plot y = 3x/(x - 2) + 5x and y = (x + 4) / (x - 2) and see where those two intersect
yeah but i think im allowed to rearrange the equation a lil bit algebraically and then draw two functions
yeah
i mean if you rearrange it into the form f(x)=0 then yeah it becomes looking for the x ints
instead of intersections between two curves
ok so if it becomes f(x)=0, look for the x int instead of the intersection between two functions, as there is only one function.
wait here
i got (5x+2)(x-2)=0
when solved algebraically, i state x=2 or -2/5
ignore verifying for now)
but when graphing, am i allowed to move one of the expressions to the other side of the = sign
so 5x+2=-x+2, graphing y= 5x+2 and y=x+2 and look for their intersections
You could either plot the two separately and see where they meet, or rearrange and plot one function and find the points it intercepts the x axis
(in some cases, one may be easier than the other)
yeah
oh wait
i cant do what i just mentioned since that is a property of multiplication right-
or could i
ok...im confused w graphing...
so for c, in teh end it goes like x^2+2x-15=0
(x+3)(x-5)=0
x=-3 or 5
(I'm taking your word for that for now)
Do you have to plot those by hand? 
you have to graph the original equation and find the point it meets
not this
Well, you could, though that does seem a little bit "circular reasoning" to me, in that you find the solutions in the process of figuring how to plot, but then using the plot to find those solutions 
btw have you learned extraneous solutions
its a reciprocal function
yesh
yeah it is
are you sure you have to graph it by hand?
yeah
what is it?
what is..?
What is an extraneous solution
Or look back at your algebraic answer bc your pretty close
extraneous root is smth u solved it algebraically but gets rejected as it is pt of the restriction
Yes when it returns an answer thats not valid when plugged into the original equation
So going back to your answer, do you have any extraneous solutions?
So computationally dense
Exactly why I hate high school
Btw you have to do substitution back though
Graphically is not hard too for a just let (X+4)/(x-2)=1-6/(x-2) I think
Probably hard to draw in a way but doable
If you try to graph without some factorization it would be really hard, some of them especially right or left hand side can be simplified significantly if you do a little manipulation on the side I think
6x/(x-3)=(6x-18+18)/(x-3)=[6(x-3)+18]/(x-3)
Something like these
And you will always have some coordination to begin with
Btw I am not really good at calculation so go with my sol without check might lead you into trouble 🫣🫣🫣
@tough falcon Has your question been resolved?
which is ma faute fs..
OH MY
nvmnvm
yeah i got the same stuff when algebraically solved
i just dont know how to graph so...
so for D, before figuring out the solution, it says (3x+1)(x-1)=0
thats my factored answer
idk what to do w it though..
You have to factor this way for RHS
X/(x-1)=1+(1/(x-1))
This is much better than with two X in a fraction right?
Of course if you just represent them in a root formula you can also write Lagrange interpolation which can help you draw somehow maybe
???im sorry im bad at reading fractions via computer
Using computer? Then what’s the problem here
ik what an interpolation is but whats an lagrage interpolation
Just graph and get the answer
i think the curriculum and the terms my school uses are quite different..
If it’s just using computer to draw just get the answer
I don’t see any potential problem you can mess up thing though
It’s only a bit troubling when you do by hand
yeah im supposed to be drawing it w hand..
Then just do what I said well if you want computer to help you then just use computer
ok...
This isn’t that hard to draw right?
yaeh
Why would you draw anything like X/(x-1)
This is harder to draw
And you can maybe factor out constant to cancel for other side
its just VA at 1 and HA at 1 and table of values
oh
?
sorry i just dont think my head is workig rn
So 4-1 and then the left side is easier too
And simplify the LHS
2x-1)/x(x-1)=1/x(1+x/(x-1))+3
Again you can further simply
Same trick
1/x(2+1/(x-1))+3
trying to process those fractions
lemme write down the fractions i cant read them 😦
With our earlier manipulation
RHS is +1/(x-1) right since have have already factored out an one and moved it to left
This means 1/x(2+1/(x-1))+3=1/(x-1)
so many (X-1) annoying
How about substitution
Easy
Now right
mm
I mean this is pretty much very easy to draw
It doesn’t matter you just love these term for grouping
Or just proceed with separate comparisons
It would work
If I may have done some algebraic mistake since I am lying on my bed so I didn’t use any paper or pen
Just used my phone
So do a double check to understand the concept
Actually all these questions you could use this trick
It’s always easy to play with constant plus a curve
Rather than two nonlinear equations
I am so tired can’t open my eyes and can’t even read properly i am gonna sleep please do some revision then you’ll be fine
You really need to try though your inability for now to read fractions and also unable to sense these manipulation all pointing to lack of exercises, and I feel you can do much better since at least you’re listening
Math is different than other study, it has been a game in its nature, without playing the game you never get leveled up
ill try to work on it by writing them down
wait so what you did is:
X/(x-1)=1+(1/(x-1))
(2x-1)/x(x-1)=1/x(1+x/(x-1))+3
(2x-1)/x(x-1)=1/(x-1)
1/x(2+1/(x-1))+3=1/(x-1)
i copied pasted stuff u wrote but erm..
Yes but do double check please
I am too sleepy to make my brain functional, but this trick is essential the way for reducing complexity
same im also still kinda confused w what the trick is but.. thanks
Just simplification
Basically
wait did u find this strategy from like a video or...
i would like to revisit but im afriad that this chat will go up and i cant see it then so..
Yes you often just assume to do it but I guess yes there might be video like factorization techniques basically search this up
Cross method, or simply try to complete the formulation by addition or subtraction to make it more favored in algebraic closed form
alralr
It’s a simple concept that YOU DO NOT DRAW this directly it’s daunting
Yes they want you to draw it by reducing complexity first
Mathematics is about to reduce a complicated problem to simpler one
yeah but once i reduced it there's nothing left so
These equations even professors wouldn’t draw them directly
You only need to reduce it to a point where comparison or drawing is easy
yeah
In fact in mathematics, you’ll learn Jacobian transformation, it’s to reduce complicated equations to simpler one
So you can simply proceed
Yes
when we're simplifying rational equations, we multiply the lcd to all terms
there, would the lcd and cancling out denominators become a POD
Well if you prefer mechanical way it can be or you simply multiply the entire denominator on both sides
In some case you can use like conjugate too
yes but when we're cancling those denominators out, would those denominators be POD?
POD?
not in school but ik what it is
so would that be a no..?
If you want the most elegant way to figure out the discontinuity
Then you can do long division directly on a fraction
uh what
Yes sometimes if you cancel things out you potentially can miss some discontinuity
Long division
Can preserve the discontinuity
so cancling out (simplifying) always have pod right?
No, canceling can lead to loss of point of discontinuity
That’s why it’s actually an interesting question
But why you want discontinuity?
no haha...
It’s fine I will use b as example
ok
Here you go
How you do it
Haha even I forgot to use this method when I was writing the answer for you earlier
I just realized I made many mistakes earlier 🥲
Practice more, I mean you’ll actually know the most abstract concepts learned isn’t what you got from high school but elementary
Counting
Long division
Commutative
Distribution..
These are highly abstract
You’re welcome
@tough falcon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help me here
where are you stuck, or do you not know how to approach the problem?
@polar wren Has your question been resolved?
dont know how to approach
evaluate alpha first
x/(x+1)-->1 for limx-->inf
||your second bracket then becomes 1/e-1||
e/1-e * ( 1-e/e)^ infinity
||times together gives alpha=1||
but second bracket is raised to power x?
no?
all is raised to power of x
this thing becomes 1/e - 1
=(1-e)/e
top and bottom cancels giving this is 1
raised to inf is still one
so alpha is 1
then your answer is actually 0
@polar wren do you get now
calculator answer if you dont believe me
bye
Closed by @polar wren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that every positive integer $n$ has a unique factorial expansion, meaning there exist unique integers $k > 0$ and $f_i$ such that $0 \leq f_i \leq i$ for each $i = 0,1,\dots,k-1$, with $f_k > 0$, and
$n = 1! f_1 + 2! f_2 + \dots + k! f_k$
Given the factorial expansion $(f_1, f_2, f_3, \dots, f_k)$ of
$N = -8! + 16! - 24! + 32! - 40! + 48! - \dots + 2000! - 2008! + 2016!$,
determine the value of
$f_1 - f_2 + f_3 - f_4 + \dots + (-1)^{k-1} f_k.$
WD_Nessuno
It should be about divisibility and factorisation but have no idea on how to prove this
you first need to analyze the factorial expansion of N
Each factorial term represents a unique contribution to the expansion. The coefficients $f_1$ are uniquely determined by how each factorial contributes to the total sum.
donut
oh sorry it should be $f_i$
donut
WD_Nessuno
hmm so when you observing the alternating pattern in sign, we see that each factorial contributes with a coefficient of 1(or -1, and depending on the sign.
ok so every couple of numbers is $(n+8)! -n!$
WD_Nessuno
that thing implies to $f_1 - f_2 + f_3 - ... + (-1)^{k-1} f_k$
donut
but it says to me it's 504
because each coefficient contributes to a telescoping sum that simplifies to 1.
hmm idk why?
WD_Nessuno
i dont get why it should even be one
here is the solution from chatgpt i just searched
ChatGPT always get things wrong why even bother asking him
idk you can lookin ur book already
the first part of unique i got that
theres the answer but how would that help me
there isn't an explanation?
nope
😩
@white mesa Has your question been resolved?
@white mesa Has your question been resolved?
💀 1 raised to infinity is actually an indeterminate formhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ea23eufsN8E
Sign up for an free account at https://brilliant.org/blackpenredpen/ and try their daily problems now. You can also get a 20% off discount for their annual premium subscription so you can get access to ALL of their awesome designed courses!
#NotExact1
For more resource, please visit: https://www.blackpenredpen.com/calc2
Click to subscribe fo...
!nogpt
Please do not trust ChatGPT or similar AI tools for mathematical tasks, as they often generate output which "sounds correct" but has numerous factual or logical errors. Use of these AI tools to answer other people's help questions is strictly against server rules (see #rules).
why even help someone if youre not gonna bother to understand it yourself
@white mesa have you tried to put any simpler differences of factorials in factorial expansion form?
for example, what would 6! - 3! be in this factorial expansion?
once you know what this looks like youre just summing over them
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help
i dont know how to get the answer for this
hi guys
this the answer in the ms but idk how this the answer
im a complete beginner on math
What is your answer for the earlier parts?
for which question?
because i believe this question can stand on its own
even tho its a sub question
This says "hence", so it assumes u have done stuff already you can use
Have you done part iii yet?
ye
its just sub in
wait i just realised the answer for ii) is the same as iv)
but idk how that relates
@oak magnet @obtuse oxide
sorry im on a train rn had really bad signal for a bit
ok
what is your answer for iii?
4 for both
AMysteriousStranger
so u get $9|2x-5| = 80x - 16x^2$
AMysteriousStranger
so at the points where y = 4, this is true, which you proved in iii
and because you have the values of x where they intersect
so after that?
you can state when the line $y=|2x-5|$ (which is in red here) is less than the other line
i think
AMysteriousStranger
i think i get it
@keen tide Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @keen tide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hiii could someone please tell me if I did this right and my method is correct?
yeah it is correct
Okay thank you
Also are there any things that need to be remembered while doing these sort of questions?
Like if I'm doing it in an exam are there tips or anything yall can give me?
@vital scroll Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vital scroll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@slim kettle
So like this ?
Yes sir
c = -a
b+d=a²
a(d-b) = -24
bd = 55
I writed;
b+d = a²
d-b = 24/a
Did you mean that?
Well u could substitute it for d in second and fourth eqn
Sorry for the lengthy method i cant think of anything else
Ok
Wait are you sure its correct?
Because a² = b + d
@slim kettle
Maybe bd = 55
I can the Couples (11,5) (5,11) (-11,-5) and (-5,-11)?
<@&286206848099549185>
Yeah
Hello
@tepid hound
Now you can eliminate the third and fourth pair because of a^2 = b+d
Because a is real therefore b+d should be non negative
then you can get value of a=+-4
You can assume a case where d>b or b>d
Then put values accordingly
Then you can arrive at a solution
@tepid hound Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
edexcel further pure one a level maths, vectors
it's just c i want to understand how to do
thanks guys
<@&286206848099549185>
For a you should find the normal vector using the points A B C
Do you know the equation for a plane?
r.n = d
also hi
i know how to do a and b
pretty sure
for a you do b - a and c - a and cross product for the normal vector to the plane and then sub in one of the points to get d
For CDE im fairly certain you need to use the properties of the dot product
and for two its just the formula for volume of a tetrahedron
Yea
what are the properties of the dot product
So basically A*B = ||A||||B||Cos(theta)
yeah a.b = moda mod b cos theta
Length of a time length of b times cosine theta
Yea
So you can rearrange that and take inverse cosine
But remember we are looking for the smaller angle
i know that but its just what to put into that formula
So depending on the dot product we can see if it is obtuse or not
You have to solve for vectors
Using the points
how
how can i draw out a 3d coordinate system on paper
Bro just draw it
btw thanks for helping
what do you mean just draw it hahaha
an angle has been drawn
I am not at my desk rn so I cant draw it
Ok do you see how you have two vectors
Use that for the dot product
ok
uhhhhh
kinda
its ok thank you though
i have to go now anyway
byeeeee
thanks for the helo
broski
You’re welcome
@naive mirage Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
I have this problem and its solution. But I am struggling in finding the valid n
I'll write my reasoning...
i see F is not defined for n<0
the partials i get to compute the curl are the same and = nxyr^(n-2)
this means the partials are not defined when n<2
So i have 2 cases:
- n<2 F is not well defined
- n>=2 F is well defined and the region is simply connected
I think this is different than what the solution is showing.
i think this part is wrong.
Its not. Lim x goes to inf. And 1 to inf is 1.
@merry prawn Has your question been resolved?
help
@merry prawn Has your question been resolved?
I have no idea what part of Case 1 you think is wrong
You'll have to show some work to justify that. It's clear the only problem is near the origin and intuition suggests that checking n = 1, since that's the easiest to do in your head, you get functions like x^2/sqrt(x^2+y^2) and the limit exists. I don't see anything at a glance that would make any other value of n particularly sacred that would cause a sudden failure.
i wrote above, the partials are nxyr^(n-2)
so if n<2 then r will be on denominator, and when r is zero the partials are undefined
so if partials are undefined, it is not a simply connected region if n<2
Why are you writing the partials half substituted like that? x and y are still functions of r.
bruh did you even watch the video it literally explains why ur wrong
was simpler and shorter , and the poblem itself wrote the function with r like that.
but i did the calculation with x and y, not r. I agree i find it weird but since they write like that i thought it made sense for most people... dont know
So do you still have a problem with that mixed partial or is this resolved?
yes
my problem is not the mixed partial, my problem is the n
i have a feeling you are not reading
Well, there is an easy way to leave no doubt about that.
<@&286206848099549185> can i get help?
@merry prawn Has your question been resolved?
I can help
ok
basically my teacher in set 3 wants me to find precentages of a number without using calculators
m
but i dont know how i dont understand anything
Claim a channel
what?
Wait
what does that mean?
Nvm
ok
Give me one of ur questions
so i need to find 15 percent of 67 with noi calculator
nvm not 15
19 percentage of 67
how do i do that?
no😭
i didnt learn how to do that yet
they showed another way but i couldnt understand anything
What percentage is equal to 1
100 [ercentage
So put 19 over 100
Closed by @merry prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
19% is also equal to 19/100
ok
Then put 67 over 1
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I have some function representing a transformation say f:R^2->R^2 is it standard to write f(X) where X is some set of points in R^2 to mean the set of {f(x):x\in X}?
yes
with f:A->B, f(X) with X subset of A is standard notation
"image of X by f"
@tiny oracle Has your question been resolved?
thanks
Closed by @tiny oracle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can somebody dumb this down/explain this to me, pls? Specifically the corresponding stuff because I don't rlly understand how to corresponding stuff works
Corresponding y value is the output of the function
Eg: for f(0) draw a vertical line through 0 and see where it intersects the graph, the y coordinate is your corresponding value
(this is going to sound really silly) if i draw a verticle line thru 0, how would i know what my y is
OH
Between the red line and the black graph
ohhhh

Closed by @magic quartz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.reopen
Points $X$ and $Y$ lie on sides $AB$ and $BC$ of triangle $ABC$, respectively. Ray $\overrightarrow{XY}$ is extended to point $Z$ such that $A, C$, and $Z$ are collinear, in that order. If triangle$ ABZ$ is isosceles and triangle $CYZ$ is equilateral, then the possible values of $\angle ZXB$ lie in the interval $I = (a^o, b^o)$, such that $0 \le a, b \le 360$ and such that $a$ is as large as possible and $b$ is as small as possible. Find $a + b$.
lj
$help$
lj
@zenith dagger Has your question been resolved?
@zenith dagger Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im doing a physics project where I drop a weight on rubber bands (like a bungee jump). Stupidly I did even weight first then odd which means that when I got to my max even weight the rubber lost its strength so to say. Now I have a shift in my data.
I said to my teacher can I draw two curves one with even and then one with odds weights but he said no.
How could I mathematically adjust the data to work without faking my results?
repeat the experiment?
yeah thats what I said to him
but it isn't an important project
its like a practice one for smth to come
it seems like you will just have a certain amount of variance in the data. it seems to me that it's better that the effect of the rubber getting less elastic is at least distributed throughout the data rather than concentrated on one end
@granite anchor Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @granite anchor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The letters of the word PRINTER are arranged in a row. Find the probability that there are at least three letters between N and T
How should I approach this question?
!nosols
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
it’s not 240
and don't blurt answers out either
Mb
there can physically only be 3, 4 or 5 letters between N and T
right
N___T__
_N___T_
__N___T
N____T_
_N____T
N_____T
& the same but with the N and T swapped
42 what tho
and the total number of ways to allocate the N and T is 7*6
could you explain how?
to count the total number of possibilities, the N can go in 7 places and the T can then go in 6
wym
like yk how u said N can go in 7 places then T can go into 6?
what about T can go in 7 palces and N can go in 6
does the latter not matter when we do 12/42?
it's an alternative way to count the same thing
oh so regardless the final answer will be 12/42?
yes
okay
well, simplify that, but yes
mmm i was hoping you’d do another way that’s similar to my textbook solutions
i’ll show u hold on
i’m just a little confused with how they do it
i get the 5C4 part cus there’s 4 letters in between N and T
same with 5C5
but idk abt the rest
@lilac sluice Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
im p sure 5c4 is just tbe ammount of ways to choose 4 letters from the 5 excluding N and T
yes
what about the rest tho
oh whoops misread that
4! is the stuff for between N and T, 2! is for N and T itself, and 2!/2! is uhh im not sure
hmm
would it be the R’s?
like there’s 4! factorials of rearranging the letters between N and T right
so 2!/2! where the numerator is the amount of ways u can rearrange the R’s and the denominator cus that’s just the number of repetitions?
@lilac sluice Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @lilac sluice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help please so im watching a video on bearings and this is how the question was done in the video, but when i do the question in my workbook and draw both bearings i keep getting 347 for my answer and im not sure why ive redrawn it a few times
how are you getting 347
ill redo it and show u
So I've got this
But I can't work out how to measure the small angle-
wdym measure
are you trying to do it with a protractor??????
and still i don't see how 347 comes into the picture at all.
Yes
So then because I'm struggling to measure the small angle
I do the big one instead
So up to 180 and then i do it from there until the line for p
And I get 167
And then I add 180 to 167 and get 347 for the big angle
bad!
are you 120% sure that your drawing is accurate to within 1°??
Oh-
then your protractor measurements cannot be reliable
My maths teacher taught me to do it with a Protractor
you don't need one here...
Oh..
Wait the question was 149 not 147 but I get it so if I do 180-149 the small angle is 31 which means the big angle is 329
I understand now thank you
yes
I still need to use a protractor do draw bearings though right?
@vital scroll Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @vital scroll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi guys im really strugging with this problem here, because I'm not sure how to maximise one function and minimise another, we have to solve our problems using solver from excel and im just not getting the right solution
<@&286206848099549185>
@median nacelle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont really know how to do this, learnt it about two weeks ago and cant seem to get it into my head
do it step by step
for each operation do a new column in your table
fill the table : $P | Q | P \vee Q | \neg(P \vee Q)$ with their verity statements
tm
idk how to make a table in latex
(•)(•)
@west vigil Has your question been resolved?
idk how to unfortunately
j was hoping i could get help on 1.a
then mimic it for the 1.b
i would appreciate it as a stepping stone yk?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Stuck on question D the graph one
You can eliminate option D quite obviously
The horizontal asymptote is y=-3
and vertical is x=5
so uh
you should be able to narrow it down
one with an asymptote at x=5
and y = -3
yeah
it's not hard to narrow down given the previous questions
@fleet lark bro it's a dead giveaway, don't react with that
just look at each graph
some of the graphs have the same asymptotes
do some have the same PAIR of asymptotes?
basically, choose the one with positive vertical asymptote and negaitve horizontal asymptote
No
B
C
so then its C?
congrats

.close
Closed by @fleet lark
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why the variance is wrong here
@polar wren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does this mean ?
is it 3 log base 3 statement 8 ?
Ann
@ivory basin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm still not sure why $a=\frac{n}{\gcd(n,m)}$ is the smallest $a\ge1$ such that $n|ma$
Luca M
@karmic crane Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey could anyone help me w the n=k+2
I think you can use the a^(2n+1)+b^(2n+1) factorization
but lets see
hmm
$87^2500^k+87^k500^2+587Q\mod 587$
vengeance
so then we just analyze $87^2500^2(500^{k-2}+87^{k-2})\mod 587$
vengeance
which obviously, according to our rule, is divisible by 587, thus proven
Operation timed out.
Huh
try to look through it
But u cant do tis no?
i expanded the $(87^2+87^k)(500^2+500^k)$ here
vengeance
we have it from the assumption
Oh I see
see how last term will expand
wtf
💀😭
Wait
But
From the last term is it not 87k x 500k
Not 87^k + 500^k
U cant use the assumption
😭😭
mesus now
try
Uhm


