#help-17
1 messages · Page 299 of 1
Break apart the tan2x and rewrite the right side in sinx
Use a different cos2A
And divide out a cosx
Simplify the left side too
idk how to go about simplifying the left side
There are like terms
-2A-2A=-4A
1-1=0
Don’t forget the negative on the right
so is it -4sin^2x on top and bottom?
Yes but more on the bottom
elaborate pls
1+1=2
Yes and you can divide out a 2
from the left side?
You’re missing a1
^
a 1 where
oh ok
and where’s the negative go 💀
oh okay yeah but i don’t see how it equals the right side
ive been doing this one problem for 30 minutes now 💀
Just don’t forget any of the terms
The penultimate line left numerator is correct
That’s the only part that is correct there
i got the numerator to match but idk about the denominator
Show me please
oh then what am i doing wrong to simplify this
Divide out a2 from it
i thought thats what i did
No
4A/(4A+2) = 2A/(2A+1)
Cosx in the denominator of the right side and a forgotten negative
are we dividing by a 2 or a -2?
Just 2
Just don’t forget that cosxcos2x = cosx(1-2sin^2x)
It wouldn’t be right to write it as 1-2sin^2xcosx
oh okay
@stone timber Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @stone timber
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
problem 20
you dont need to split it
Do you remember your log rules? 
i was thinking of a different method, chartbits method is fine
You don't remember what log(p/q) turns into? 
log p-log1
dumb number
Pad
I extend a deep gratitude for your kindness.
so you did remember 
hey, it's quite cool 
I’m able to plug in numbers now right
After splitting
You could if you wanted to, or however they presumably taught you to deal with telescoping sums 🔭
(also @hushed pewter hiii
)
Yea you plug in a few
For the pattern
Then Elipse thingy
To the an term you know
That probably didn’t make sense
But you know
I kinda get what you mean 
Ah that's fair
yep you can try that here of course, and find out what happens and all 
Awwwww 
It diverge yay
But.
How does it go to negative infinity?
i wrote down the pattern
and every term cancelled each other out
except 0 (the very first term)
infinite sums do not work that way
Oh
infinite sums are the limit of the partial sums
if you stop at any given partial sum you’ll have a -ln(n+1) left over
which diverges to -inf
note that ln(1) is 0 also
well what do you think is canceling?
The previous term
well all the middle terms yea
but the extreme ends remain
ln(1) - ln(N + 1)
this is our sequence of partial sums
then the infinite series is simply the limit of these partial sums
as N -> inf you get -inf
Extreme ends remain like the last terms
well depends on what you mean by term
i meant this^
I see
This makes sense
$\sum_{n = 1}^N \ln \frac{n}{n+1} = \mathcolor{red}{\ln 1} - \cancel{\ln 2} + \dots + \cancel{\ln N} - \mathcolor{cyan}{\ln (N + 1)}$
knief
then take lim N -> inf
mhm
the n + 1 is always too far ahead in the race
there ln(n) bit will always need an additional term to cancel any ln(n+1)
so if we stop the sum at say n = N then ln(n) will only ever reach ln(N) meanwhile the ln(N + 1) maintains the lead in the race
you’re welcome
So
That makes sense
Only part I’m still confused about
Is the cancelling part still
Apologies
if you’re one step ahead of me and for every step i take you also take one step then i’m never going to catch you am i
assuming we take steps of the same length of course
Oh so
The point of cancelling is to depict
The end term and terms at the start that don’t cancel
Like
The steps
That
Show the length
bad explanation prob
yea idk what you mean?
there was no "point of canceling" it was just a matter of fact
it’s just what happened
think of the ln(n) as pac-man
Is the point of canceling these terms to mark the steps from the beginning to end and the steps in the middle are irrelevant to our final series equatuokbthing we get at the end (idk what it’s called)
eating up the remains of ln(n+1) from the previous term in the sequence
well it just helps to see how it’s behaving
the point is to find the sequence of partial sums which for any N is given by this
I see so our end product shows its behavior
i mean of course you don’t have to write out the terms if you don’t want to
but it helps
I see
you can reindex a finite sum
,, \begin{align*}
\sum_{n = 1}^N \ln(n) - \ln(n+1) &= \sum_{n = 1}^N \ln(n) - \sum_{n = 1}^N \ln(n+1)\
&= \ln(1) + \sum_{n = 2}^N \ln(n) - \sum_{n = 1}^N \ln(n + 1)\
&= \ln(1) + \sum_{n = 2}^N \left(\ln(n)\right) - \ln(N + 1) - \mathcolor{cyan}{\sum_{n = 1}^{N - 1}\ln(n+1)}\
&= \ln(1) - \ln(N + 1) + \sum_{n = 2}^N \ln(n) - \mathcolor{cyan}{\sum_{n = 2}^N \ln(n)}\
&= \ln(1) - \ln(N + 1)
\end{align*}
knief
@heavy palm Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for this q do I just equate them
this the whole q
oh I found the inverse wrong
but would I just equate them
setting them equal like that can be quite tedious
note that inverses are a reflection over y=x
and intersections would lie on that line
and your inverse is still wrong
check your work here
@modest wharf Has your question been resolved?
wat
so there is an easier way?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove that there exists number x with 2025 digits that is divisible by 5^2025 with all digits of x being odd.
im not sure exactly how to do it, but i believe you can do that with induction. maybe that'll help a bit but im sure someone else can better help
@versed pewter Has your question been resolved?
@versed pewter Has your question been resolved?
try looking at n=3 with {000,125,250,...875} and look at which digits are even/odd
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Question is asking to find H without any cartesian equations. I found N and M using vector projections. I'm completely stuck on how to do this
@quick wing Has your question been resolved?
@quick wing Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im stuck on part (b)
Do we take the derivative of c_2 and sub in (0, 0) or something?
I dont really know how to get the derivative of a circle equation
you can do it like that with implicit differentiation
but in the case of a circle, rather than of a general curve, you can make do without calculus entirely
Im not really sure how
Im completely stuck usually I have a general idea but this time I really dont 😅
the tangent to a circle is perpendicular to its corresponding radius
(4 - 0)=m(1 - 0)
4 = m
So the slope of the tangent is -1/4
And the y intercept is obviously 0
So the equation is y = -x/4
hold your horses!!!
this equation for c_2 is wrong
it should be (x-1)^2 + (y-2)^2 = 5
Ohhhhh yayayaya 😅
Thanks haha
(x - 1)^2 + (y - 2)^2 = 5
(2 - 0)=m(1 - 0)
m = 2
So the equation is y = -x/2
indeed
Arctan(-1/2) = -pi/4
nope!
Ohhh
arctan(-1) = -pi/4.
-pi/3
even worse
😭
arctan(-1/2) can't really be simplified in any way
Ah
tan(pi/3) = sqrt(3) anyway not 1/2
Hmm im not really sure what to do then
arctan(-1/2) can't really be simplified in any way
So thats just the answer?
best you can do is write it as like... -arctan(1/2)
yes it is
if you are curious it is about 0.46 rad
Ahh yeye thats the answer they wanted! 😄
,calc atan(1/2)
Result:
0.46364760900081
,calc 0.4636476*180/pi
Result:
26.56505066137
or in degrees if you're so inclined
generally, if there are angle units mentioned in the question itself, report your answer in the same units
otherwise i would default to radians
but you have to ask your teacher(s) what units they prefer
You guys are my teacher(s) 😝
But yeye thats a good rule to follow haha
Thank you so much!!
❤️
.close
Closed by @bleak prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I thought I knew how to do this one but I got a negative inside a square root
Factor out x from all terms in the numerator and set it equal to x - 2 and x + 2
3x^2 - 3x + a = x - 2
3x^2 - 4x + 2 = -a
-3x^2 + 4x - 2 = a
(-4 +- sqrt(16 - 4(-3)(-2)))/2(-3)
(-4 +- sqrt(-8))/(-6)
-8 inside square root, does that mean its not a solution, right?
Why can I not?
We want them to be equal no?
So they cancel out
for the removable discontinuity
Ahhh wait I think I get it, cause the WHOLE thing is not supposed to equal (x + 2) or (x - 2), just one of the factors right?
And set it equal to 0?
@bleak prawn Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @bleak prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Struggling to solve this DE. I know to use integrating factor method but then I need to integrate $\int \frac{\ln \sin x}{\sin x}$ which I'm unable to do
Deepwork
Would appreciate any hints to move forward!
@sick ivy Has your question been resolved?
no
<@&286206848099549185> 🙂
yep so I used integrating factor method
What's p(x)?
-cot(x)
Closed by @sick ivy
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, I'm working on an inequality for a proof and I got a bit stuck.
Basically, given angles a, b, c each individually less than pi, if I know that:
cos(a+b) < cos(c)
can I prove that:
a + b > c?
So they are between 0 and pi ?
Yes, individually between 0 and pi
The thing is that you need a+b in [0,pi] can you manage to have it ?
Yeah that's just the thing, a+b can be more than pi, so I can't really argue it's a decreasing function for both
I'm not very familiar with inequalities like this though, so I wanted to ask if it's still possible
note that the inequality is false precisely if there exist a, b, c < pi such that cos(a+b) < cos(c), but a+b<=c.
now if a+b<=c, then a+b<=c<pi
yes, we're trying to prove that "if cos(a+b) < cos(c), then a+b>c"
so the statement would be false if you could find a, b, c such that cos(a+b) < cos(c) but not a+b>c
a+b>c being false is of course equivalent to a+b<=c being true
it's basically a proof by contradiction, I just tried to phrase it as a hint
Oh okay i see
Ah so.
Assume a + b <= c
c <= pi ==> a + b <= pi
cos(a+b) < cos(c), since both are less than or equal to pi
a + b > c
Contradiction!
a + b > c
Is that sound?
yep, that's the idea
essentially, a+b>c always holds under the condition because a+b <= c would put a bound on a+b
Yes, thank you so much!
This is the ending to a proof that I had spent a bit of time on and I really feared that I had wasted my time
Alright, thank you again.
.close
Closed by @proven bramble
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
Am I mistaken to think $\int_a^b \vert \vert F'(t)\vert \vert dt =\vert \vert F(a) \vert \vert - \vert \vert F(b) \vert \vert$
Wild123
very!
.
forgot how it went
.close
Closed by @oak magnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
new coose x2 combo
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for question e i wrote : the ground is level with the bottom of the castle
would that be right
i think they expect smth like neglect air resistance or smthg
alr
ty
that would apply to all questions asking similar things right (that air resistance is negligible)
.close
Closed by @broken apex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anyone know if the following applies to the example matrix?
|1 0 0 1|
|0 1 0 0| = |I F|
|0 0 1 0|
where F =
|1|
|0|
|0|
such that
|-1|
N = | 0|
| 0|
| 1|
but in this matrix:
|1 1 0 0| |I F 0|
|0 0 1 0| = |0 0 I|
|0 0 0 1|
Where F =
|1|,
|-1|
|-F| | 1|
N = | I| = | 0| (where is the identity matrix? it doesn't show up in the previous matrix)
| 0|
this is based on the idea that reducing a matrix to rref returns some form of |I F| where you can easily format the special solutions to result in:
|-F|
| I|
but in the second example, the identity matrix is split down the middle by F, so it doesn't seem to apply properly. is there some form of trick/manipulation of the array that I don't know that makes this trick hold for matrices like the one above?
Also, feel free to ask for elaboration on any of the parts, because i believe i might've missed a detail or two.
@mild rampart Has your question been resolved?
@mild rampart Has your question been resolved?
@mild rampart Has your question been resolved?
@mild rampart Has your question been resolved?
you understood by now?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this correct? this is my last attempt
did you use $Pe^{r t}$?
south
exponential growth equation
i did p=A/e^rt
yep, that's the correct rearrangement
,w 2000000 / (e^(6.75/100 * 22) )
Wolfram rounded but you can click the link to check
yes that's correct
Closed by @regal urchin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if i have a quadratic like (x+5)(x+8) = 0, then i know that x=-5, x=-8. if the equation's right side wasn't 0, do i have to expand the left side?
e.g., if (x+5)(x+8) = 4, do i need to expand it as x^2 + 13x + 40 = 4, then subtract 4 to make the right side 0?
or is there a trick i can use, knowing that (x+5)(x+8) = 0 will give -5, -8?
yes, so what you have used here is something called the zero product property (and it has a few other similar names too)
which says if ab = 0, then at least one of a, b must also =0
you could have both a = 0 and b = 0 actually: that indeed makes ab = 0
(well this case doesn't happen in practice, when solving equations)
the only case you can't have is that $a \ne 0$ and $b \ne 0$, cause then $ab \ne 0$ too
south
so 0 is special
if you had (x + 5)(x + 8) = 3 you would have to expand the LHS then subtract 3 on both sides, to make the RHS = 0
(There is a different case if x is an integer however, it is called a Diophantine equation.)
oh the trick that also works is difference of two squares
if we change your example to (x + 6)(x + 8) = 4
that's just ((x + 7) - 1)((x + 7) + 1), where a = (x + 7) and b = 1
you have (a - b)(a + b) = a^2 - b^2
= (x + 7)^2 - 1
so (x + 7)^2 - 1 = 4 and now you can solve this
don't forget to take plusminus on the RHS after square rooting both sides!
yeah i get that, but im asking if i need to expand the LHS and then subtract the RHS
If you would like, I can give an example problem from a competition I just took
no, the difference of two squares method means that you don't need to expand the LHS
Not in all cases
no worries!
.close
Closed by @void stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi there. I have a quick linear algebra concepts question, since I'm bad at visualising maps.
Suppose I am given a basis (B), another basis (C), and a linear transformation ( \left[T\right]{B \to C}), i.e. a linear transformation that takes a vector expressed in basis (B) and expresses it in terms of basis (C). I'm being asked to find ( \left[Tx\right]{B} ) for a given vector (x).
RiverineDolphin
As I understand, in order to do so I need to take a few steps, right?
Like first, I need to express the vector (x) in terms of basis B, since that's what the linear transformation takes. So my first step is to calculate ( \left[x\right]_{B} )
RiverineDolphin
And afterwards, I can simply use matrix multiplication to find:
[
\left[T x \right]{C} = \left[T\right]{B \to C} \left[x\right]_{B}
]
RiverineDolphin
But afterwards, I need to use a change of basis matrix to then change the result of the transformation into basis B, like so:
[
\left[ T x \right]{B} = \left[ I \right]{C \to B} \left[ T x \right]_{C}
]
RiverineDolphin
Which is another matrix-vector multiplication.
Is this thought process correct?
So putting it all together:
Suppose I am given a basis (B), another basis (C), and a linear transformation ( \left[T\right]_{B \to C}), i.e. a linear transformation that takes a vector expressed in basis (B) and expresses it in terms of basis (C).
In order to find ( \left[Tx\right]_{B} ) for a given vector (x):
First express the vector (x) in terms of basis B, to obtain:
[ \left[x\right]_{B} ]
Next:
[
\left[T x \right]{C} = \left[T\right]{B \to C} \left[x\right]_{B}
]
And:
[
\left[ T x \right]{B} = \left[ I \right]{C \to B} \left[ T x \right]_{C}
]
Thus obtaining what was required.
RiverineDolphin
Is this correct? 😄
Hurrah!
And just to confirm my understanding, there are other ways to do it, right?
Like, if I wanted to, could I have applied a change of basis matrix directly on the linear transformation itself
for instance?
Ah, gotcha.
yes, you can see how your final solution is [ [Tx]B = [I]{C\to B} ([T]_{B\to C} [x]B) ] but you could just have easily done [ [Tx]B = ([I]{C\to B} [T]{B\to C}) [x]_B = [T]_B [x]_B ]
cloud
Understood.
@heavy yoke So, here's a part of the concept that I struggle to understand.
When we're given a vector x = (1, 2, 3), I understand that this is implicitly given in terms of the standard basis E = {e_1, e_2, e_3}
And likewise, if I'm given a matrix that represents a linear transformation, it is both written in terms of the standard basis, and yields a vector in terms of the standard basis
So a regular matrix can be seen as [T]_{E \to E}
But what does it mean for a transformation to be expressed as [T]_{B \to B}?
If I think of it as a function in terms of computer science (a poor analogy, I know), I can understands it as a function that takes an vector as input in basis B, and returns a vector in a basis B
But it's still somewhat unclear to me.
Like, is [T]{B} the same as [T]{B \to B}?
$[T]B$ is just shorthand for $[T]{B \to B}$ since if you only write one basis it's understood that you are using the same basis for the domain & cododomain (input and output)
cloud
Ah, understood.
And when I "look" at the matrix which represents the linear transformation ( [T]_B ), may I understand it's column vectors as the vectors of the linear transformation, expressed in terms of basis B?
RiverineDolphin
the ith column is the image of the linear transformation applied to the ith basis vector of B, expressed in the basis B, yes
Like, if I wanted to, I could apply a change of basis matrix ( [I]{B \to E} ) upon the linear transformation ( T{B} ), to uncover how the transformation "looks," would I be correct?
RiverineDolphin
I apologise if such questions seem rather trite, but it does help me develop my intuition on how change-of-basis works.
to fully convert you would do something like [ [T]B = [I]{E \to B} [T]E [I]{B \to E} ] and in reverse [ [T]E = [I]{B \to E} [T]B [I]{E \to B} ] this is made a bit easier when you realize that as matrices [ [ I]{E \to B} = [I]\inv{B \to E} ]
With respect to such an example, I can imagine a case where some standard linear transformation : like a rotation, for instance, is expressed in a strange basis B. So at a glance, I wouldn't be able to tell what sort of linear transformation it is. But upon applying a change of basis matrix upon the linear transformation, I can see that it is simply a rotation.
cloud
if you've covered diagonalization yet, that's why it looks the way it does
In order to "fully convert" a linear transformation given as ( [T]{B} ), which is really just ( [T]{B \to B} ), we must apply not one, but two change-of-basis matrices.
RiverineDolphin
One to transform the "input vector" into the right basis, and then another to transform the "output vector" into the right basis
Hence the little sandwhich that we made there.
yes
Ah, gotcha.
Thank you. I really appreciate your help, it does solidfy my understanding quite substantially.
this is the motivation for ``matrix similarity'' which is when two matrices represent the same linear transformations in different bases, i.e. matrices $A$ and $B$ are similar if there exists an invertible matrix $P$ such that [ B = P\inv A P \iff A = P B P\inv ]
which we can understand that $P$ is just the change-of-basis between the relevant bases
cloud
Ah, I understand now.
an importand example of which being diagonalization, which is where we find a basis of eigenvectors (i.e. a basis in which the linear transformation will have a diagonal matrix)
Which is useful, because diagonal matrices are easy to compute with.
Gotcha.
Hmmm.
Can bases be mutually incompatible with each other?
Like, if I have a vector space V, and some subspace U
Would it be possible to find a basis for V that contains no elements of subspace U?
I'm not sure if I am mis-understanding my intuition of span here.
I understand it is very possible to have a vector space like R^3, and then a set of vectors in R^3 which nonetheless span a smaller dimension, like R^2.
certainly, no individual vector might be in the subspace, because we only require that a linear combination of them is in the subspace
But in such an example, the smaller set of vectors would not be a basis for R^3...
I'm not sure if I understand that sentence. Can you elaborate?
for example the line y = x is a subspace of R^2, and a basis of R^2 is {(1,0), (0,1)}. neither (1,0) nor (0,1) is on the line y = x
Ahhhh
I think I understand.
So you're saying. Let us have a vector space V = R^2. Let us define U as a subspace of V, where U is the set of all vectors where y = x.
Now, we can see that there exists a basis for V, which is {(1, 0), (0,1)}
Which nonetheless does not contain any elements of the subspace U.
Is my understanding correct?
yes
on the other hand, given a basis for the subspace U, it's always possible to extend it to a basis of V (i.e. there exists a basis of V containing the basis vectors of U)
Ah, I understand. And intuitively, that makes sense because
If our parent vector space V is R^3, i.e. a volume, and within it we have a subspace U, which is a plane
It is easy to add another vector to "stretch out" the plane so that it spans the volume.
Is that intuition correct?
yes, it's always possible to pick a vector outside the plane which completes the basis of R^3
Alright, and to go back to the earlier example, but in R^3. Let us suppose we have the vector space V = R^3, which is a volume, and within it we have U = R^2, a plane.
Now, the plane must intersect the origin, because if it doesn't, it wouldn't be a vector space anymore, since all vector spaces must possess the zero-vector.
However, no matter how weirdly tilted the plane of U = R^2 is
well strictly speaking R^2 is not a subpace of R^3. but something like {(x,y,0)} [the xy-plane] is a subspace of R^3 which has some correspondence to R^2
We may still find three vectors in R^3, starting at the origin, which nonetheless is not in subspace U.
Ah, what you are referring to is that in order for a plane to be a subspace, it must intersect the origin, as I was speaking of earlier, is that correct?
moreso R^2 is (strictly speaking) the set of all vectors with two entries, whereas R^3 is the set of vectors with 3 entries. so no vector in R^3 can be a member of R^2
of course there are many 2D subspaces of R^3, which are the planes through the origin (and any 2D vector space is isomorphic to R^2),
Ah, I understand.
Thank you very much for your help tonight.
I'll go ponder on these in my own time ❤️
.close
Closed by @restive basalt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain to me how to simplify this step by step? I can only think of DeMorgan. Thank you
Nicolas Matheisen
Ok, I’ll try to write down the implication differently first?
yes
Ok let me try I need 5 min of thinking
maybe you need more complex thingas like distribution near the end, i haven't tried
but that's the start
Nicolas Matheisen
ok, i solved it, there's no demorgan
As I understood DeMorgan, one thinks that an A becomes a \neg A
this exercise has no de morgan
This?
Is it possible to solve this completely once and then I have even more tasks here that I have to solve?
I hope I can understand that then
@wanton elk if u have time can u help me
I think frog meant the site
Closed by @vestal lynx
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this a test
.close
Closed by @lost yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whats the problemo
If f(2)=0, and f(4)=0, what does that imply about 2 and 4?
Not at all.
can we do a first please
i thought 1 root = 0
it would mean there is only one value that makes f=0
isn’t that b??
Yeah. But still, your reasoning is incorrect.
can u explain pls
No. If the quadratic has one root, it has a root of multiplicity 2. Meaning, it occurs twice in the factorization.
So, what can you deduce about a?
No, the quadratic does.
im not to sure
Okay. Do you know what a perfect square trinomial is?
nope
It is in the form (x-a)^2.
It has a root, x=a, with multiplicity 2.
I guess, the vertex is (a, 0).
tp??
Hm?
is a just -2
Yep.
i just guessed that what’s the real reasoning
OHHH
wait im dumb
if it has 1 root only
and x-2=0
that means there’s only 1 answer
ok got it
lets do b
Yes
what does f(2)=f(4)=0 actually mean tho
What does f(2)=0 mean to you?
no idea at all
It means that 2 is a root of the equation.
What about f(4)=0?
4 is a root of the equation??
Yep.
the wording confuses me ngl
Can you try part c)?
which guy
The one who helped you in the other thread.
Yes
Or, actually, you can just use the fact that the average of the roots is the x-coord of the turning point.
hm?
So, $\frac{2-a}{2}=3$.
mathisfun
It only works if the leading coefficient is 1.
^
what’s average of the roots??
Like, the average of the 2 x-coordinates of the roots.
Closed by @stone oyster
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wondering where they got the highlighted term from
.
im so confused though they just brought it from no-where @scenic ravine
jmm
not really out of nowhere
you have to sort of "reverse engineer" in such problems
What a wonderful world !
Can you first off, simplify this for me
its simplified
in the
solution
@scenic ravine
line 3
from where the solution begins
From here?
yes
okay, do you get how the first step came to be
yes but
im confused about the second line
in the solution
i dont really understand it
This part?
no no no its not that but
the highlighted bit
they just got it from thin air
i dont really know what they did to come up with the inequality in the first place
@scenic ravine
They probably just thought this function is squeezed between these two functions as we got to infty
That's teh best I cna think of
is anyone else able to help me with this
thanks in advance
.
ping helpers
@tepid kiln Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
particularly confused with question c and d
Wat is 34×39
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
@orchid osprey Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with these
which one first, 6 or 7?
...hold on, the idea i had for 6 isn't cooking like i thought it would...
the phrasing of #6 is a bit unclear.
are we supposed to prove f' = 0 everywhere between alpha and beta?
or just that there exists xi between alpha and beta such that f'(xi) = 0?
also this xi is a bit sad
OP's disappeared.
@dreamy kindle are you here?
Yea
ok right
can you clarify what was meant for #6?
is xi meant to be under a for all quantifier or a there exists quantifier?
it is indeed even simpler
rolle's theorem.
Rolles theorem
which kind of spoils it
f(alpha) = f(beta) = 0 is quite obvious yes
@dreamy kindle do you understand what to do for 6?
Yeah thanks I got it now
this one seems like you can just rawdog ∂^2u/∂x^2 and then use the fact that u is a symmetric function of x, y and z
to cut down the amount of calculation you have to do by a factor of three
Let me try
maybe factorizing the stuff inside the log could help a bit
@dreamy kindle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I do not know anything about the topic? May you suggest any videos or serve discussions about this?
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
Thank you
I'm sorry. This isn't close to the photos.
You might consider specifically "Correlation Analysis" as the term.
Is this close to the photos? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11c9cs6WpJU
This video explains how to find the correlation coefficient which describes the strength of the linear relationship between two variables x and y.
Correlation Coefficient: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=11c9cs6WpJU
Statistics - Video Lessons:
https://www.video-tutor.net/statistic.html
Covariance and C...
yes
ok
After watching that video, I still do not understand. May someone help me understand?
Any specifics here you don't understand?
I do not know the step by step process
I'm very organized so The photo is quite confusing for me
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
Is it the numerator or denominator you have trouble understanding here?
The numerator contains the sums of error in relation to the mean.
The denominator contains "corrected sample standard deviation" for both x and y.
This is called "sampled correlation coefficient". Does this term help?
The formula looks just like that.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
Like I do not know what is the first step
whether it be the table first or the formula
Usually you need the samples first, therefore the table.
The formula comes in as a tool/function for you to input the calculations towards r.
Everything to the left of the board is the theory, describing the coefficient.
The x table is the observations here from what I recall. What is the y?
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
It would be the corresponding value to the x.
Even if the table is not sorted, there are still data points in the sample.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need the solution for this pls(my homework due tomorrow)
x = 2, y = 5
oh my bad cube root
but it seems like you knew that
i just dont remember
There's nothing to remember actually
my brain isnt braining at that time
have a donut
too sugary. have just nuts instead
have a nut
Have a do
@stone stream Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A careless mathematician didn’t wash his hands properly and ended up catching a cold. To recover, he had to take all 15 pills from a blister pack of cold medicine. The doctor's recommendation is that he should take either 2 or 3 pills each day. Assuming the mathematician decided to take his health seriously and follow the doctor’s advice precisely, in how many different ways can he consume the 15 pills?
(A) 21 (B) 28 (C) 36 (D) 45 (E) 55
I already know the answer because I tried to brute force it, counting all the possible ways. But there’s definitely an easier and faster way to solve this — I just don’t know what it is.
I found 28 possible ways
there's two cases, depending on the last day
e.g. 3 pills on the last day, there's as many ways as you would count in 12 days pills without restricition
or the last day had two, then it's 13 days
so 2 pills is 1 and 3 is 1 and 4 is 1
<@&268886789983436800>
If the last day was 3 pills, so in the other days he had 12 pills, so I have to find how many ways he could take these 12 pills
yeah
Alright
then 5 pills is 2: maybe it ends in 3, then there's one way, or it ends in 2, then there's one way
then 6 pills is something, and eventually you get to 15
I didn't understand this
that's the base
you can eat 3 pills if you eat 3 pills
there's no second way
4 can only be 2+2
Alright
So I have to count how many ways I can get 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... ways
Right?
yeas
Closed by @distant perch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do we do the last part?
Assume the dice is fair and six sided
two events are independent if P(A and B) = P(A) * P(B)
therefore determine P(A and B), P(A) and P(B)
Is the probability for both equal to 1/6 in this case?
P(A) × P(B) and P(A and B)
For getting both at the same time, or for getting either?
Both at the same time
ys both RHS and LHS are 1/6
Then you are right
Closed by @digital glen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
Can you find the equation of the tangent at x = a?
@peak shore Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove 1/x + 1/y = 1/z
Finally.
Ok, what do you know about similar triangles?
Closed by @white horizon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Logic problem, trying to make a latch that only updates when the bit labled clock switches from 1->0, and uses a D latch as normal, outputting the stored result when clock is 0
to use the same tool, go to https://nandgame.com and then go to the settings tab, click import, input the attatched text file, click import, back, and you have the level with my current solution
An educational puzzle game. Solve a series of tasks where you build increasingly powerful components. Starts with the simplest logical components and ends up with a programmable computer.
please ping me if responding
@analog marlin Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@analog marlin Has your question been resolved?
@analog marlin Has your question been resolved?
@analog marlin Has your question been resolved?
the error might be in the program, if this seems correct please ignore
might be more of a CS question, you can also go to #old-network and join the computer science server. im sure more people will be able to help you with your problem there.
that's awesome, didn't know we had one of those
ty
.close
Closed by @analog marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
of course!
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would it be dy/dx = 2x + 4
i dont get it when it says f(x) = x^2 + 4x
is it like d/dx = 2x + 4
bum chicken
wdym?
I DID IT LAST YTEAR
whats ur syllabus
@finite hatch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @finite hatch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I put sec into a calculator
Cos-1?
1 divided by cosine
Isn’t that cos to the -1
no
no
Bc it goes into a fraction 1/cos
the notation is confusing but cos^-1 does not mean the same thing as 1/cos
Like x^-1 is 1/x
cos^-1 means the inverse cosine, ie "cosine of what angle equals this number?"
welcome to the clusterfuck that is trig notation
yeah, but with functions an exponent of -1 conventionally refers to the functional inverse
Yay
The first of many I assume
Ty guys
.close
Closed by @tender gale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Wait so do I still do hyp/adj
Or is it sohcahtoa
Cos = adj/hyp
So if you do cos^-1(adj/hyp) you get the angle in that triangle
You get the angle that’s adjacent to the side that you’ve put in
@tender gale Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tender gale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you... just multiplied some stuff ONLY on the RHS?
?
you multiplied by (x+3)(x+4) but only on the right
without also doing it on the left as you should have
i did do that
nope
u saying x=4 shouldcut out
no
then
easier to show what i mean than say it in words
jsut write the better version of it
one moment please
i've shown the thing i multiply both sides by in red
and the cancellation that follows, in green
the question
ok sure
second step
i could have guessed you started with this
and then got to this
ok
do you understand this? yes/no
ok
Closed by @keen seal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ is an open set, $A, B$ differentiable functions, $A : \Omega \rightarrow M_{mn}(\mathbb{R}), B : \Omega \rightarrow M_{nk}(\mathbb{R}), u : \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n$. $\forall x \in \Omega, V \in T_x\mathbb{R}^n$, we define $V(A), V(u)$ as the differential of A and u along the vector field V.
I try to see if $V(AB)=V(A)B(x) +A(x)V(B)$.
Wild123
Hi
Firstly, I'd like to see if I am correct in writing that for $x=(x_1,...x_n), V=\Sigma_{i=1}^n V_i\partial_i$ and $A=(a_{ij}(x)){i, j= \overline{1,n}}$, then $V(A)=\Sigma{i=1}^n V_i(\partial_iA)$
Wild123
If the above is correct, When proving V(AB) is what I wrote above, given it's a matrix, can I just look at an arbitrary component and prove the equality stands?
Here's what I came up with:
looking at element jk (line j, column k), note $A_j$ the line j of matrix A, $B_k$ the column k of B. We have:
$\Sigma_{i=1}^nV_i (\partial_i \langle A_j, B_k\rangle )=\Sigma_{i=1}^n \langle V_i(\partial_iA_j), B_k(x) \rangle +\Sigma_{i=1}^n \langle A_j(x),V_i(\partial_iB_k) \rangle$
Wild123
@vocal pagoda Has your question been resolved?
@vocal pagoda Has your question been resolved?
@vocal pagoda Has your question been resolved?
!helpers
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #❓how-to-get-help for instructions.


