#help-17
1 messages · Page 277 of 1
did you look at the correct points?
Not sure honestly.
Correct me if I am wrong on this one
Answers should be
A. -2
B. 2
C. 2
And D. Is still 2
Yes
so what happens to the left limit?
It moves up?
1
exactly
$\lim_{x\to 1^-}f(x)=1$
Bonk
The limits are the y right essentially?
I feel like I am finally recalling my grade 11 stock knowledge
its what the function approaches
Or maybe I’m wrong
if you were to put in values of x closer and closer to 1
you can see that i slowly goes towards 1
Which is the other hollow circle on the left?
So you mean to say it just transfers to the left hollow circle since they are the same shape and design?
And approaching from the left so there?
im not sure what you mean by this
but like question 2a and 2b you got correct
When the limit is negative it is approaching from the left and is going towards the right side of the graph
The positive limits works in an opposite way
dont think of it as positive and negative limits
how did you get 2a and 2b?
Visualization.
Lucky guess you could say in a way
I was just observing the circles and arrows
Ah not lucky since 2a is wrong
no, 2a and 2b are correct
Oh I see
so im wondering how you got that correct but not 1a and 1b
the left sided limit at x->1 of f(x) is 1
and the right limit is the same
the general limit is also 1
and the function value f(1)=2
if this helps, great
So a and b is 1 right?
Are they the same cause I just go back and forth or is it a different reason?
they are the same because if you go from the left and right you approach the same point
there is no "jump"
like if you look at -1, there is a jump
Yes
$\lim_{x\to -1^-}f(x)=3\neq 1\lim_{x\to -1^+}f(x)$
Bonk
$\lim_{x\to x_0}f(x)=L$ if and only if $\lim_{x\to x_0^-}f(x)=\lim_{x\to x_0^+}f(x)=L$
I don’t get it
Bonk
which part
but yes, c=1
because a and b are equal and are 1
This
I am coming back to my grade 11 math’s with knowledge I forgot from grade 11 calculus
😄
If you ask me why the reason as to why I am trying this
Well it is because tomorrow we have a test in physics and there are bonus grade 11 calculus quesitons and if we get them right
Big exam bonus scores
So I am trying to get all of these right
So I can figure out number 1 and number 2 now
Hmmm
What about number 3 and 4.
You guys didn’t mention that part
Did I get it right?
For question 4?
4a,b,c are wrong, only 4d is correct
Btw am I allowed to like ping you or other helpers here when replying or nah?
yeah idm
but generally i am quite active in the channels
so i will see it either way
yes
yup
wrong point
you are looking at x=-8
but it asks for x=8
i know its a bit confusing
i got ocnfused a few times aswell haha
no... its -1.0
notice how the dot below is filled in and the dot above is not
Why downwards instead of up?
Ohh
So that’s why
So if it was in opposite position.
The answers would be different?
wdym opposite position?
if the top dot would be filled in then f(0.5)=1.0
is that what youre asking?
If the top dot was filled and the bottom dot wasn’t
Would jt be opposite or a same answer?
I see now
So my only mistakes left are 4 a,b and c
Hmmm
Spoil me a bit on the answers on 4 a, b and c.
,rccw
4a,b,c = 4
yup
Damn
there is only a perforation
so the limit exists
and if the limit exists, its equal to the left and right limit
Any tips or advice on solving this kind of problem?
If I ever need to backtrack quickly in the future.
imagine there is a bead on the line
and you slowly push that bead into the position
*but never actually reaching it!!!
and you do that from the left and from the right
if you get the same answer, the limit is that answer
I see
So allow me to summarize everything up and verify it all to you
So this is revised and everything I have answered so far
I am much more confident in answering part 2 because I used a calculator
Just had to figure out test 1
@bonk
2c is wrong
the function doesnt even go down to -8
Ohhh
So it is 2 then?
$\lim_{x\to 8}g(x)=5$
Bonk
Ohhh
where did i say that?
So like a marble
Sorry I mistook this
Well your advice does work
3a is wrong
I guess the answer to all this is practice
4 is correct
well, thats most of maths tbh
10 is wrong
yes
is the 4x_4 at 11 supposed to be a - or a +?
You’re asking limits right?
Or the number itself
If the number itself
Well it is a _
If there are exponents
There are substituents I think?
Since that’s what I remember they are called at in chemistry
What’s the answer on 10?
,w graph 1/x^3
nope
Thank you very much kind person
@whole forge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me solve this? I calculated it and it gave me the answer if the $9213.04 was the interest and not total
what answer should you be getting?
I think so to the nearest hundredth
well i don't do this kind of finance math 😭
,rotate
,calc 9213.04/1.02367
Result:
9000.0097687731
But what I don’t get is there is 2 P’s but the answer ditches one
Prt is only the interest
you need to add it to the initial principle
it's like if you invest 1000
the "extra" money is the interest you get
let's say that's 100
what's your new "total"
1000 + 100 right?
Yes
so I = Prt is the money you get from interest
the "extra money"
they want the new total
so P + Prt
But how can I calculate the interest if I don’t know what the principle is?
btw brb
@delicate nest Has your question been resolved?
u can't
but you don't have to calculate it separately, do you?
they want you to calculate the "new total"
new total = old total + interest
old total = P
interest = Prt
new total = P + Prt
you know new total 9213.04, r = 4.8%, and t = 180/365 years
so 9213.04 = P(1 + rt) = P(1 + (4.8/100) * (180/365)) and yeah it's basic algebra to solve for P
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
on the cartesian plane we can never form an equilateral triangle with 3 points with integer co ordinates, but can we form an equilteral triangle with 2 integer co ordinates and the 3rd abitrarily close to an integer?
like can we form an equilateral triangle w 2 integer co ord vertices and the 3rd infinitely close to an integer?
i was fooling around in desmos and found some examples that are reasonable close to this but is there a way to rigorously prove this?
wdym arbitrarily close to an integer??
like
if i give u some very small number
like 0.0000000000000000001
is it possible to find an equilateral triangle w 2 integer co ordinates and a third this close to an integer
i got some examples for 0.1 0.001 by brute forcing
<@&286206848099549185>
Is it 1+??
P + Prt = P(1 + rt)
btw best to start a new channel
joemama is using this channel now
Can you help me in 11?
@sleek birch Has your question been resolved?
@sleek birch Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I tried to use LH and the definition of the derative but yet it is wrong
definition of derivative would be easiest yes
nope
HUH
do you know the limit definition of derivative at a point?
lim x->a (f(x)-f(a))/(x-a) = f'(a)?
yes
f(0)=sin(9)
yes f(x) should be sin[(3+x)^2]
aaah okay so the answer would be 2 sin(3)cos(3)?
How did LH not work?
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
,w lim x to 0 (sin((x+3)^2) - sin(9))/x
,calc 6cos(9)
Result:
-5.4667815713081
damn i got it wrong
,calc 2sin(3)cos(3)
Result:
-0.27941549819893
messed up chain rule somewhere i think
mistake here
write $\sin((x+3)^2) = \sin(g(x))$, $g(x) = (x+3)^2$ and use chain rule to find the derivative
riemann
oh so it would be f'(x)= cos((x+3)²) *2(x+3)
how do i know if it is sin((x+3)²) and when it is (sin(x+3))²?
cuz now i could have guessed it because of the sin(9) which is sin(3²) but what if i couldnt see that
riemann
it's quite confusing unfortunately
ooooh thank you did not know that
ye true especially with ^-1 and stuff 💀
i mean it is definitely true that you can interpret this as f’(0) for f(x) = sin(3+x)^2 but it may be easier to see it as f’(3) for sin(x^2)
yea that's even worse
since it follows directly from the definition of derivative
ah shit this is easier
Riemann learning from someone else 👀
his way is correct
instead a=3 would make the original f(x) = sin(x^2) work
Ye true but it is not the fastest
but wouldnt i need to substitute first
x+3=u ?
x=0 -> u=3?
you still need to do chain rule either way
oooh with the h definition method
ye true
damn
math so fun 💀
2xcos(x^2) vs 2(x+3)cos(x+3)^2
aaah thats why they used sinx²
$f’(\mathcolor{red}{x}) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(\mathcolor{red}{x}+h) - f(\mathcolor{red}{x})}{h}$
x = 3
that’s how i see it
textbf x 
to put emphasis
that's quite the dedication
no vectors lol
nah
Matrix wasnt great
oh wait i can use colors right
what is the difference between an absolute maximum and local maximum? Local is at the end of the domain?
$\mathcolor{red}{x}$
knief
aura
knief
much better
Closed by @severe stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
red 👀
i personally like orange
$f’(\mathcolor{orange}{x}) = \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(\mathcolor{green}{x}+h) - f(\mathcolor{blue}{x})}{h}$
riemann
that blue is bad
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Each natural number m < 100 is assigned a natural number F(m), also less than 100. The sequence a_ 1 = 1, a _(k+1) = F(a_k) is constructed. Prove that there is a number n < 100 for which a_n = a_2n.
Closed by @halcyon thorn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m dealing with this question. I need help understanding the concept/ checking if I’m right
What I’ve understood is that with sigma notations you have to take the lower limit and add anything between that and the upper limit( as in if 1 is lower limit and 3 is upper, I’d also have to include 2)
So what I need help understanding is would I go about this question like this
1^1/1 + 2^1/2+ 3^1/3
Or is k is supposed to stay 1 at all times?
The k=1 at the bottom of the summation symbol tells you two things.
- the variable that changes across iterations is k
- the first iteration starts at 1.
Every iteration, this variable is incremented by 1 (add 1 to it).
Then the number at the top tells you when you stop.
Then it's just a matter of finding out which of the summand (what's after the summation symbol) is a general expression for the sum you're trying to express.
You can usually spot the pattern just looking at what you've written down already, i.e.
1^1/1 + 2^1/2+ 3^1/3
Which of the expressions do you think fits?
I’d assume A since it’s 1 over k which is the same as a root
So whenever we’re dealing with k I can change it until I’ve reached the upper limit
Yes
Closed by @light geode
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
anything u like
I'd say 10, just using intuition and basic equations (420 = n(-3+87)/2 gets you n=10). Idk tho, forgot HS maths
I'd love it if somebody could help me with my sht :d
I'm dumb, its not finished
a_n = a_1 + (n - 1) d which gives you 87 = -3 + (n-1)d
S_n = n/2 (-3 + 87) = 420
and then you have a simultaneous to solve
84 is double the average
so 42 is average, so there's 10 terms
so it goes +90 in 9 steps
I’ll try both again
And see what I get
Ty
,w 87 = -3 + (n-1)d and n/2 (-3 + 87) =420
should get that for values of n and d
mmmm7
ofc
a_n means the nth term
n means the number of terms
@light geode Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for a functional depending on multiple functions such as $ (A_{\nu}) $
MARCEL serker
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
and $ T_nu $, with the lagrangian
i tried to extremalize this directly without taking the variation separately
v
and i said that we find the corresponding euler lagrange equations :
but here :
it says that you have to take the variation separately
i was wondering if i wrote bullshit or it is equivalent
@chilly onyx Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@chilly onyx Has your question been resolved?
@chilly onyx Has your question been resolved?
Useless
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@chilly onyx Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this?
,rccw
I just dont know how to do this problem
have you been introduced to the pythagorean theorem?
yes
what does it say?
huh?
what is the pythagorean theorem?
oh a^2+b^2=c^2
i dont remember exactly
then you should should go back and take a closer look at the theorem
i know what they are i just dont know how to explain it
then you don't know what they are
you're asking where a b and c go right?
i'm not asking where anything goes, i'm asking what they represent
"a^2 + b^2 = c^2" with no further context is just a plain old equation. We need to know what a,b,c actually are for it to have meaning
(and for you to be able to use it for your question)
i never learnt that, i just learnt the equation and how to solve it
how was the pythagorean theorem presented to you?
is it in a textbook? Its own worksheet? Written notes?
written notes and the teacher just saying how it works
please show me these notes
I learnt this a year ago, so i dont have the notes with me, i just memorized the equation
well that's not good
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/cc-eighth-grade-math/cc-8th-geometry/cc-8th-pythagorean-theorem/v/the-pythagorean-theorem watch this before continuing with your worksheet
i never watch math videos because i never pick up on what they teach, sorry
well that's a shame. Good luck then

good luck in what???
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
Oh these ones
So an and b are essentially legs of a 90 degree triangle….
C=is the hypotenuse
Or longest side
oh ok
On this sheet
The variables are wrong
Well not wrong per say
Pythag thereom is essentially just a general thereom
ok
So for the triangle on the left.
A and b are the legs
Which means they sit
Um sort of like this
Notice how they are on opposite sides of the 90 degree angle
Like the 90 degree angle is in between the a and b
yeah i see that
Where a and b can be anything, just not a negative number
C
As you can see is the length of c is diagonal to the 90 degree
Utilizing this previous knowledge
We can just do
ok
A=5.5 b=3.1
So pythag thereom states
5.5^2+3.1^2=c^2
So first we can solve the a^2+b^2 portion
5.5^2+3.1^2=39.86
So we have 39.86=c^2
Honestly a and b can be either or
Just remember that the 90 degree angle must be in between a and b
6.3=c
Yes
Well approximately
So for your problem
the hypotynse is equal to approximately 6.3
So a=6.3
and then for the second triangle you would do c^2-b^2=a^2?
I mean yes that’s just a way of manipulating the function to solve one of the leg value
So for this problem
5.5^2-2.7^2=22.96
22.96=a^2
22.96^1/2
huh?
or yeah
oh ok
Does this clear up any confusion with using the pythag thereom
yes thank you
No problem
What are they?
Complimentary =90 degrees
ok
ok
I’m gonna rephrase this
Complementary is the sum of angles that equal 90 degrees
I would focus on the upper quadrant though
i see it
So
each quadrant is 90 degrees
and on the frist and second one
you could figure out the other degree
the 4th one would obviosuly be 90
You would subtract 90 degrees from the known angle
but the 3rd one
thanks once again
You’ll be able to be really creative
i like geomoerty overall
Closed by @zinc blaze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @latent marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
special triangles
??
@ionic flax Has your question been resolved?
No
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
might be a really dumb question, but how can X = 280 if the domain is 180<x<270
i checked the key
yeah that doesn't seem right
Possibly with reference angles?
or 100% its off
this is practice diploma questions so i doubt its wrong, i think their taken straight from real diplomas
i don't see how reference angles would make it right
well it's always possible that i'm missing something
Idk how to properly solve it, i got -60degrees lol
i checked the key and got confused
CAST rule applys?
if sin is negative, quadrant 3 and 4
@woeful igloo U know how to solve this?
heres my work its kind of shit lol
ignore the bottom half, thats a diff question
Yea, 240deg should be x-40.
I guess what they meant to say was x-40 should be in 3rd Quadrant
Coz otherwise, there is also a solution in 4th quadrant
Wdym?
there are no solutions as written
Maybe they edited the question later on as an afterthought and forgot to fix the rest of it
Like the reference angle is in 3rd quadrant only?
Ahh ok
ill forget that one
this one, i got really close answer but C is throwing me off
I got 122, answer is 121
Not sure why it will be 1npi
since if im not wrong, the only NPV is 0,1
sinx = 1, and cosx = 0
actually nv
I think ,if cosx = X value, x = 0 at 90deg and 180deg right
idk trig like this hurts my brain
Ye i think thats right, im just confused cuz cosx = 0, cos is = 0 at 0,1 and 0,-1, but inverse cos of 0 = 0, 1 only
Just need clarification on my understanding from someone
@latent marten Has your question been resolved?
From cost/(sint - 1) = … I would move sint - 1 over to the other side
@latent marten Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Prove or disprove: if lim(f(x))²=1 in x0 then lim f(x) = -1 or lim f(x) = 1 in x0?
I did the following : we get lim(f(x)f(x)) = lim f(x) * lim f(x) = 1 so it has to be either 1 or -1
seems ok to me
So it's true? 🤔
Also, prove of disprove: lim f(x)² = 1 in x0, so there's always a neighborhood around x0 such that for every x in that neighborhood, f(x) is not equal to 0
1/2 🤔
Nvm
It's times haha
The limit need not exist at all
This is assuming lim f(x) exists
I am sniped
What's a counterexample?
You both are messager xd
Consider the function that is -1 for all x<=0 and 1 for all x >0. Limit doesnt exist at 0, but lim f(x)^2=1 at 0
Got it
So this is also false?
Oh wait
I think it's still true
It would be true without the lim for sure imo
That is indeed true, since for any eps>0, there is a neighbourhood around x0 where |f(x)^2 -1| < eps for all x in neighbourhood, so f(x) is either in (1-sqrt(eps), 1+sqrt(eps)) or (-1-sqrt(eps),-1+sqrt(eps)) for all x in neughbourhood
Taking eps =1/2 we get such a neighbourhood where f does not become 0 anywhere
Closed by @hot gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help solving when a balloon becomes empty. Its volume is 5000cm^3 and the speed it decreases at can be solved with the formula (20-0.01x) cm^3/s
the answer is in terms of "x" ?
nvm lol
its the time they want i think
!ss
Please post images (such as PNGs or JPGs) of the question rather than other filetypes such as PDFs which have to be downloaded. Non-image downloads can potentially contain viruses or other security risks.
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
A pic of Q would help :)
no pic just text in a foreign language and i gave the relevant info volume is 5000cm^3 it is leaking according to this formula (20-0.01x) cm^3/s at then the question is how long before the balloon is empty?
So I'm assuming the time is represented by variable "x"
So that your equation looks something like; $-\dv{V}{x} = (20 - 0.01x)$
I think so since we have a speed which it decreases and a volume
Arya
can you solve it? you just need to integrate both sides, w.r.t. dx
wait so its like -5000x = (20x-0.01* x^2/2
...
Let's do this step by step pls? 
what do you get on integrating this?
0 ≤ x ≤ t
idk how the way you written it
you said both sides but is not only one sided made to an intregraal?
do you mean both sides should be turned into primatives or just one side
nope, you have to integrate both sides right? since there's an equality sign, if you do any operation on the right, it should also be done on the left
It'd be better to show you what I mean
$- [V(x)]_0^t = \left[20x - 0.01 \cdot \frac{x^2}{2}\right]_0^t$
Arya
did you get it?
so you turn both sides into primative functions within those brackets for intregrals?
that is how seperable differential equations are solved ✅
not to mention, if you do an operation on one side of the equality, you MUST do it on the other side as well
so the primative of the volume would be 5000x?
or what is this part or is uit just refering to the decrease function as a whole
this is me writing the "rate of decrease of Volume" [hence, the -ve sign]
this is what we get after integrating on both sides
Now, we put the boundary conditions, at time "t" the volume, as a function of time is V(t), and at time t = 0, the volume initially was 5000 cm^3
So the LHS is basically, -[V(t) - 5000]
and the RHS is 20t - 0.005t²
So your volume function at time "t", would just be V(t) = 0.005t² - 20t + 5000
@honest lightDid you get this?
yeah
can solve the quadratic to get the time when V(t) = 0
Closed by @honest light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
help please
yeah you have different options
you can try to invoke $A = \frac 12 ab \sin(C)$
mmmm7
okay so
which place do I do that for
cos all the options are confusing me
that rule is forrr finding the area i think?
wdym which place?
u could try finding angle Q
thats for finding area so first i need to find q then but for finding q won't I need to find p first?
no you can find Q with law of sines
finding Q gives you P for free
the sine rule?
yes
and then you have the setup for this
Closed by @vital scroll
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&268886789983436800>
.close
Closed by @mild flower
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
o((x+1)^3) doesn't mean (x+1)^3
it can tho right?
no
o means strictly asympotically smaller
(x+1)^3 is in O((x+1)^3) but not o((x+1)^3)
in any case the derivative is wrong
you have 3x^2 + 4x + x instead of 3x^2 + 4x + 1
ye saw that
if something is o((x+1)^3) as x->-1 then the first 3 derivatives will be 0 at x=-1
can you give an example to something that is o((x+1)^3)
So I can just put any of these and get the right answer?
the exponent has to be bigger than 3 right?
oh wait if this is true can't I just ignore it?
.
yes
0 is o((x+1)^3)
but notably
you can obtain the values of the first 3 derivatives by ignoring it specifically
which in this case is sufficient
but note that they could put something in there which is sometimes true and sometimes false depending on what the extra asymptotic function is and in that case you couldn't just take one example
like imagine they put f(0) = 0 as a possibility
this is true when your extra function is 0 but not true if it's something like (x+1)^4
@solemn spear Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @solemn spear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@frail violet Has your question been resolved?
@frail violet Has your question been resolved?
A is the matrix which is given in the defination
or thats what I am calling it atleast
@frail violet Has your question been resolved?
@frail violet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm unsure as to how i can solve this problem. I was able to complete another one with a square root in the denominator but this one beats me...
direct substituting ofc doesn't work, it leads to 0/0 which is undefined
Whenever there are roots mixed with addition/subtraction, think conjugate
the x is approaching a -1 btw, it's hard to see in the pic
is that like multiplying top and bottom with either? That's what i did for my last question
You multiply it by the conjugate of the part with the root
Yeah that
Here the conjugate of $\sqrt{x^2+8} - 3$ is $\sqrt{x^2+8} + 3$
Azyrashacorki
Right. So i multiply x+1 with that?
I wrote it down but im not really sure how i'd continue from there
im thinking the conjugate would cancel out with the original so i'd be left with sqrt x^2+8 +3/x+1?
You multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate
So that you effectively multiply by 1
Then the numerator is a difference of squares
The denominator is a bit messier, but don't expand it yet since it should cancel
did i do this right? ^
<@&286206848099549185>
$= \frac{\sqrt{x^2+8}-3}{x+1}\cdot \frac{\sqrt{x^2+8}+3}{\sqrt{x^2+8}+3}$ $$= \frac{x^2-1}{x+1} \cdot \frac{1}{\sqrt{x^2+8}+3}$$
huh that's different from what i was told to do earlier
let me simplify it for you
Goëtia
Better @buoyant star ?
Sure but now i'm just confused as to how you got that end result. where did x^2-1 come from?
multiplication of the conjugates
i mean yeah but how did you get there? What was multiplied?
yes but where did -1 come from? I'd get is -3 and +3 got canceled out but i have no clue what you did
bro what?
(a-b)(a+b) = ?
what? hold on give me a min
wait how do you even multiply when the numbers are in roots?
I'm not getting any of this
$(\sqrt{x^2+8}-3)\cdot (\sqrt{x^2+8}+3) = \sqrt{x^2+8}\cdot \sqrt{x^2+8} + 3\sqrt{x^2+8}-3\sqrt{x^2+8}-3\cdot 3$
Goëtia
Okay i see now
so then where do we go from here?
you simplify then thing on the left and plug -1 u get -1/3
np
.close
1/2 isn't the solution to 7A
@buoyant star Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $C_0(X)$ be the space of all continuous functions that tend to $0$ at infinity. It is claimed this space coincides with the space of all continuous, bounded functions $C_b(X)$ when $X$ is compact. I don't see why.
psie
Arnavutköy
exactly, this I don't understand either. If X=[0,1], we could have f(x)=x+1. Does it tend to 0 "at infinity"?
no, i just don't think this original statement is well-defined
it's what's written in my book 😔
this seems to be analysis. which textbook?
well, this one
i am almost certain that some other properties of X were given beforehand
is X a subset of R^n?
well, first it was stated that $X$ is a separable locally compact metric space, for which $f\in C_0(X)$ iff for every $\epsilon>0$, we can find a compact subset $K$ of $X$ such that $|f(x)|<\epsilon$ for every $x\in X\setminus K$. Clearly, $C_0(X)\subset C_b(X)$, and then they claim that if $X$ is compact, then $C_0(X)= C_b(X)$.
E is X?
psie
okay so that's what "tend to 0 at infinity" means in this context
yes
but you can see that taking K = X here works always when X is compact
ahh yes, indeed 
essentially compact sets have no points that go off to infinity
so the tending to 0 condition is null
what does this mean? 🙂
it's not a very precise statement
but say for example compact subsets of R^n are always bounded
there are no points that are arbitrarily far from others
compact metric spaces are also bounded
but compact is a bit stronger than bounded
ok 👍
of course, continuous images of compact things are compact so any function defined on compact X must be bounded
yeah
so here, there's no "infinity" in your X in the first place
so you could in fact say that f tends to 0 at infinity
because it is vacuously true
👍
.close
Closed by @halcyon sluice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Explain this one please
,rccw
@thick ocean Has your question been resolved?
Write the general Equation of a normal and compare it with the given equation
Upload image of solution
I don't understand
No
Slope of tangent to parabola at any point (h, k) is 2a/k
So, for normal, the slope becomes -k/2a. Now y = mx + c is normal => m = -k/2a or k = -2am so h = am²
So the point (am², -2am) satisfies the line y = mx + c
Plug values to get c
Slope of tangent to parabola at any point (h,k) is 2a/k. How ?
y² = 4ax => yy' = 2a => y' = 2a/y
@thick ocean Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yall wgat do i even do
what does rate of change mean to you?
erm the rate of change
the ratio
like how much they change when 1 goes 2 to
idk how to put it into words
but
the only part i really need help on is
f(x) = 3^x
and g(x) = 3x
@cedar wedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
guys
@calm reef Has your question been resolved?
no
@calm reef Has your question been resolved?
what have you done so far?
do you know what a limit is?
i dont understand the negative and positive signs above the numbers in the limit
ok, have you attempted to learn about those?
those are called left-side and right-side limits
@calm reef Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @calm reef
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185> let's say there are two circles with their centers A1 and A2 and their radii are equal to r1 and r2 ,let n be the distance between the centers of the two circles and n<r1+r2. Is there a way to find how much is the area that is formed when the two circles are overlapping ?
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
I have a cursed way, i got a similar problem a few months ago.
basically:
Calculate the points of intersection between the two circles
Connect those two
Using the points of intersection, create a sector of each circle, considereding the angles for both
From each sector, substract the triangle formed between the points of intersection, and the center of each circle
and the "curved sections" remaining will be the overlap.
Visual Showcase
this is the correct way, it isnt cursed
oh, i sincerely hoped there was a simpler method
good then
originally i used integrals, using the crossing section as the x-axis
bad idea
So it is possible to get a formula for this?
yeah. it wont be pretty tho
yes but tbh its better to do it thisw ay
mostly cause it needs you to calculate the crossing points
which calls for linear (vectorial) algebra-
But it can also be done geometrically?
im trying to come up with some somewhat easy geometric solution for the crossing points
also, if for some reason, one circle "eats" the other, then the area is equal to the smaller circle area
ngl, not findin any lead on that. can we just pretend that we know the intersection points by solving a non-linear system equation?
@sturdy root Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sturdy root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello guys, need help with integration. Could anyone help me finding mistake in my solution?
Post your question!
No need to ask “Can I ask…?” or “Does anyone know about…?”—it’s faster for everyone if you just ask your question! See https://dontasktoask.com/
Post the work u did
