#help-17
1 messages · Page 254 of 1
we can find out the determinant for A
Agreed?
yes
1/det(A)
yep
it's funny you know i've been working with internal product... diagonalization... subspaces and whatnot
this is the part about linear algebra
that confuses me most
its all these properties
Lol i c
Anytime!
@open sage Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @open sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help trying to understand, how to sketch this function. so far i have the VA and y-intercept and also the local max
2 things i am not understanding right now are the inflection point and second root of f(x)
i have the general idea of how the graph is going to look
but i dont know what to do with those 2 points, inflection point and second root of f(x)
<@&286206848099549185>
@untold crescent Has your question been resolved?
maybe third time the charm?? <@&286206848099549185>
Lemme read your question
okkk
It so long
lol
yep
i made lines on how it should look like, but not in correct points
It looks something like this
ooo
Let's mention a few things
yes please
what does this mean?
ooo
how do you know where to plot the lines for from -1 to -4, do you just estimate it?
one sec
ooooh
i am getting it
what about the postive side of x-axis? do we draw line there also
And it approaches - infinity at x=1
After 1 is a lot simpler
sorry i am still a bit confused, how do we know when the curve starts to bend
Follow g and j
cause we dont have horizatonal asymptote
We do
It's always supposed to be mouth opening upwards
And is supposed to approach 1 at infinity
No other curve can satisfy this condition
the dotted lines you drew?
Yes that's just supposed to show that at infinity the curve approaches 1
Yes
so the dotted lines you drew, are refeering to the limit
Y=1
Yup
thank youuuu
You want me to draw this cleaner
i was about to end the help request, but you came just in time
??
yes please
Give me minute
i want to verify that I draw it correctly
Drawing on phone is hard
lol it is
Admittedly i am amazing at it as can seen by my obviously perfect curves :p
curve looks about perfect
lmao
ooo, thank you so much
lmao
I am not picasso
bro pulled up a
I am better
i forgot what its called
picasso student fr
Closed by @untold crescent
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with a taylor series problem pls
u messed up the indices
@fast stump Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not the physucs
hi can someone help me just draw a free body diagram I want to make sure i have it set up nicely
there are 4 forces right ? two normal, one gravity and one for the hanging mass?
wait actually if the vertical hinge is my pivot point i dont count that force right
plz 😭 🙏
@frosty robin Has your question been resolved?
@frosty robin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yeah
It's not a yes or no question
pls help me i hve watching video on youtube over and over still i have not understand the question
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello! i really need help in learning linear regression as I think it would be useful to understand why it gives its output
and also using it to see how backpropagation works and stuff
so my question is why is the slope of a best fit line represented by cov(x,y)/var(x)
I know that both expressions get the spread of the data
I dont understand the cov(x,y) though
I know its supposed to get the average spread of both x and y
But why does multiplying them work?
why does cov(x,y)/var(x) represent the slope like y delta/x delta
<@&286206848099549185>
do you know derivatives?
I am assuming you do
so first we define the error function as the sum of squares of the difference between the value the line gives, and the datapoints
let us say our data is x1,x2,x3,...,xn and y1,y2,y2,..,yn, and let us say that the mean of x and the mean of y, are both 0
and let us say our line is s*x = y
yes
I can understand this
Also another thing
yes
no, we calculate the error for y
oh alright alright i understand noww
so the equation would be
sum (y(true)-y(pred))^2
Ye
wait
is that right?
so this is sum(s*xi-yi)^2
alright so our line is s*x = y and the avverage of all the datapoints x,y is 0,0
because predicted value of yi is s*xi
Ohhh nvm i see i see
i thought it was true - prediction
and not prediction - true
it is the same either way
(a-b)^2 = (b-a)^2
so you know that a function is minimised when the derivative is 0, right?
what we do is we take the derivative of this
with respect to s
no
so d/ds (sum(s*xi-yi)^2) = 0
extremised
Wait i dont understand this part
i know the rest about derivatives
minima?
ok
imagine you have a continuos differentiable function with a minimum valus
sry, i have to go now
ok i can understand this noww
resent
and also using it to see how backpropagation works and stuff
so my question is why is the slope of a best fit line represented by cov(x,y)/var(x)
I know that both expressions get the spread of the data
I dont understand the cov(x,y) though
I know its supposed to get the average spread of both x and y
But why does multiplying them work?
why does cov(x,y)/var(x) represent the slope like y delta/x delta
<@&286206848099549185>
am back
yeh am coming to that
so if we take the derivative of this with respect to s, and set it to 0
we sum(d/ds(s^2*(xi)^2-2s*xi*yi + (yi)^2) = 0
😭
this is the same as
sum(2s(xi)^2-2xi*yi) = 0
what happened?
i dont understand the d/ds
so we basically find the derivative of each point?
yes
and that sum = 0
yes
yes
so
sum(((s*xi-yi)^2)') = 0
sum((s^2*(xi)^2-2s*xi*yi + (yi)^2)') = 0
sum(2s*(xi)^2-2xi*yi) = 0
sum(s*(xi)^2)=sum(xi*yi)
s*sum(xi^2)=sum(xi*yi)
so we have
s = sum(xi*yi)/sum(xi^2)
= (sum(xi*yi)/n-1)/(sum(xi^2)/n-1)
= cov(x,y)/var(x)
ok i see but why do we use the error and derivative to get this
i understand that we simplified the square basically
because we want to minimise the error
and minimizing is usually done by setting derivative to 0
did you understand the minima thing?
so it takes the sum squared error, finds its derivative and then sets it to 0
yes
any how will the error relate to the original dataset
we want the best fit line, right?
Yes
so the line with least error, right?
Yes
and to find the line with minimum error we take derivative of error and set it to 0
does this make sense?
Well kinda but what would the error look like on a graph error is a function right?
here
error looks like a parabola with respect to slope
i thought we were just subtracting the true with the predicted
and then squaring it
and then adding it up
to get error
What if we took the root of that sum?
does this make sense?
sqrt
yes
if we minimise the sqrt than we minimise the thing we are square root-ing
ok but like i dont understand how it relates to sloope really
all i can see is that s*xi
the s represents the slope right
yes
but doesnt subtracting it ruin it?
wdym?
how would it relate to the slope then
i dont get you?
like s*xi - yi
this is a linear function of slope?
s*xi - yi is the slope?
no, s is the slope
sum((s*xi-yi)^2) is the error
but
how would it relate to the slope in the end
ok you said we have to minimize the sum squared error
yes i know
so error is a function of slope
ok how does minimizing the error give you the slope
minimizing the error gives us the best fit line
ok so f(s) = sum((s*xi-yi)^2)
so the slope which minimizes error will be the slop of the best fit line
Wwait
I think i understand it now
So basically we try to find the slope that gives us the least error
yes
how does finding the derivative and finding (a point i think) that has the derivative of 0
i mean 2 points
one point
Ahhh i see
so as the slope changes we find the one where the derivative is 0 meaning that the error will be 0
right?
no
oof
derivative 0 means error is minimised
wait how?
dyk maxima and minima?
no
oh
one sec
let us say you have this function
and you are looking for a point where the value is minimised
what will be the derivative?
(assuming differentiability)
idk
ok
but i know its at the point that has the least y
rn i am just going to explain you some intuition
ok!
let us say the point is (s,f(s)) and since the function is differentiable there are 3 possible derivatives, positive negative and 0
right?
r u there?
yes
ok
one last thing what does differentiable mean?
has a derivative
oh ok ok
so if the derivative is positive, we can go "slightly left" to decrease f(s) right?
yes
and if derivative is negative we can go "slightly right" to decrease f(s) right?
so that means if f(s) is minimum derivative must be 0, right?
wait yea because that means that its not at a mountain
and it doesnt have to increase or decrease its derivative slop
slope
r u typing smthing?
wait was i correct
it can?
yes
take -x^2 for example
this has derivative at x=0 as 0
but it is maximum there
wait how do we find the derivative agian
yea i do
so yk how to find derivtaive right?
Yes nvm
because if we find the derivative for the point x = 0
itll just return 0
since y is 0
i mean the slope
mb
i mean the slope is 0
anyway
since we are llokinf for a point where f(s) is minimised
f'(s) has to be 0, right?
yes
Wait but
wait nvm nvm
OHH i get it
but would that also mean
that at the minimum
wait so
x*slope = 0
just slope 0
that would be the minimum right?
Yes
from here
OHHHHHHH so we are finding the derivative of the function of the slope that equals 0
yes
such that s,f(s) find the minimum f(s)
yes
which makes s * minimum slope(0) = f(s)
wait
we are finding a slope that is 0 right?
slope of f(s) is 0, not s is 0
yes yes thats what i mean
yes
so s*m(slope of f(s) which is 0) = f(s)
no?
but i thought on a grid its s,f(s)
yes
and x times the slope gives y
is the errir
m*s
why not
i thought f(s) is y
but why does it represent y
it doesnt?
it means the points (s,f(s)) on the graph of slope vs error
i dont understand 😭
do you understand this?
we are trying to find the slope that matchs with the minimum error
and the minimum error is 0 right?
not neccessarily
you see ' in it
that means derivative is 0
so it means
that the thing multiplying by s is 0
no?
the derivative of the error is 0
what does it mean then?
ok what gets the derivative of the error to 0?
by minimizing the errot
do you get ne?
and how do we minimize the error?
by setting the derivative of error 0
ok but what do you do with the derivate after that
well i mean
once you solve for the thing that matches with the derivative 0
well how do you solve for it
here
ok but doesnt that mean that at that point multiplying by the derivative will give you the minimum f(s)
no? at that points f(s) is minimum
r u there?
yes
did you get this?
so the slope of f(s) is 0?
yes
then whats being multiplied by the slope to get f(s)??
we dont do that?
nothing?
but the slope of a line is
f(s) is not a linear function of s
f(s) is not a line
f(s) is the error
s*x is the line
f(s) looks like a parabola
why does it seem like s would be on the x axis and error on the y axis
no issue with that
but wouldnt that make s * slope of f(s) = f(s)
Ohhh
it means we find out the minimum of f(s) to get the s for the best fit line
and that also means that we can find the s that correalates to the minimum of f(s)
right?
yes
so we do that by setting the slope of the non linear equation of f(s) to 0
yes
do you get it now
So
Once we do that we solve for s right?
which represents the slope right?
yes
yes
so we solve for the slope and distrubute the square and then solve for the derivative of it and we then seperate the sllope and it givves sum xi*yi/sumxi^2 = slope
yes
so by minimizing the error we get the slope that matchs for that right
so we get the least error
also wouldnt that mean it could get stuck at local minimums
i understand it now
nice
nice
@proper cosmos Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ماهي دافعة ارخميدس
@fading marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone check this pls
@zinc hill Has your question been resolved?
can someone check 5 and 6 specifically cause i think the last two r right ?
uh
uh
Hello, I think it's all correct
@zinc hill Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @zinc hill
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
quick question to check my understanding: when you express a matrix in its own eigenvector basis, the results are always diagonal?
!occupied
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #❓how-to-get-help for instructions).
@undone pier Has your question been resolved?
@undone pier Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let $\frac{we^u-2v+w^2}{uv^2-w}=1$. Find $\frac{\partial u}{\partial v}$
hskthca
isn't the solution just multiplying both sides by the denominator, putting everything to LHS then letting F(v, w, u(v,w)) = 0? then du/dv = -F_v/F_u?
why is wolframalpha giving a really complicated answer?
did you provide that that fraction =1 ?
wdym?
oh yes
in wolframalph
somehow, using this method WA provides the same answer for dw/du, but not du/dv
show what you gave to it
so via this you'd realistically expect no more than a few terms in both the numerator and the denominator in the derivative
hm, weird
hskthca
@twilit ocean Has your question been resolved?
@twilit ocean Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how does the sin/cos/tan change through the angles q and t or in general
sohcahtoa
sin is opp/hyp
so sin q opp would be 35 hyp is 37
opp/hyp = 35/37
sin t opp would be 12 hyp would be 37
opp/hyp = 12/37
Closed by @cobalt arch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok guys i have an intersting case i wanna present and ask quesitons about. Basically statistics territory
They have to write 10 letters each day. More than 1 mistake and need to rewrite. More than 2 rewrites a day and they get a warning. More than 3 consectuive warning days during the same week and they get fired
Assuming that the number of errors per letter can be described by independent random variables identically distributed with parameter 𝜆=1.0 Poisson, calculate the probability that the secretary will be fired at the end of the 4th week at the latest.
So we basically divide this into 4 parts
Part one.Probability that a letter has more than 1 mistake
As the task said we are supposed to use the poisson here apparently
i would just be interested in knowing why exactly poisson works here
second part is what is the probability that she makes more than 2 mistakes in a day
and my question would be why we use the binomial here
<@&286206848099549185>
@tulip parcel Has your question been resolved?
poisson is just binomial with large n and small p, so they could be demonstrating their similarity, don't completely know
ah ok makes sense since a letter has a lot of words i guess and the probability to make an error is relatively small
it is a little weird to me bc n is pretty small so i don't quite know why they'd use poisson
nope 10 is not the n here
she writes 10 letters a day
but each letter individually
only allowed max 1 mistake
so i assume the letter has many words
oh gotcha
Guess that's why they set the lamda as 1 (which is n * p). to make it easier
yep
would you know why use the binomial in the second one?
it's weird if n is that large and p is that small, but technically binomial works too
it's just that poisson is easier for big n and small p
poisson is an approximation of binomial 🙂
ah ok guess it is a variation that works better in these conditions
@tulip parcel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tulip parcel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do i have reading comprehension disabilities?
if ur 350 ft away from the hot air balloon, isn't it from the point its at in the sky?
cuz ur not 350 ft away from where the hot air balloon began
i keep struggling with these stupid questions cuz i cant draw my traingles right
I think you're right
if im observing the hot airballoon from that point, im using binoculars and looking at it at an angle not straight to the floor??
😭
well generaly away means the perpendicular height
these types of questions also come in 10th class board exam
in India
so yeah
It's the horizontal distance.
i dont understand 😞
I see one mistake btw
Since it's saying the distance from the ground
Not the actual distance from the balloon when it's up
^
I think the right one is the solution
Yeah it is in the sky honestly
yeaaa idk i think the wording is just stupid 😭
No like it's fine if you're wondering that
That it's the horizontal distance is usually mentioned
But I don't see much problem with it
But the thing is if it was in the sky then it will still not change anything to the problem, the problem will still be valid
heres to hoping i dont get anhy weirdly worded questions like that on my exam 🙏
Trigonometry works everywhere (some exceptions are there but lets not talk about it)
I just consider them as mere points
,w x²-x-1=0
cos(x) = 1/2 - root5/2 or 1/2+ root5/2
Not it is not
what did you do after this?
i just left it like that 😭
ah
Okay so see you have done everything right
,w tan(x)^2 - tan(x) - 2 = 0
Now you have
$\cos{x}=\frac{1 \pm \sqrt{5}}{2}$
Arnab
You should have this first
yea i have that
Yeah
is this right?
yes(?)
This one is partially right
,w y²-y-2=0
tanx=-1
tanx=2
Two solutions would be there
Again you have made the same mistake
what about the answers after pi?
This is partially correct
It is a solution of that Question
so this?
Yeah
But again it is not the general solution
Yeah but that doesn't contribute
Hm?
jk
Like if you have cos(x)=1
You can't say that x=0°
You have to say that
x=2πn±0 where n belongs to a natural number
what do u get when the cards are being dealt in increasing order
Like. The increasing order is mentioned in the question
A<2<3<4<......<J<A<K
yes
use what
Like you what the answer or the process
both
i got an answer but im not sure if its right
Honestly I haven't reached probability yet my co-ordinate geometry is going on I can help you with algebra but I haven't still done the probability course so sorry for that
And for the trigonometry question your solutions wound be
For Q 12
x=2πn±arccos((1±√5)/2)
For Q14
x=πn+arctan(-1) and πn+arctan(2)
do u think i have to write pin for it to be right
Pin?
You need to add ±2πn in the cos inverse function
And here is the proof of that thing if you want
Closed by @winter tide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In R3 the subspaces S and T are defined
a) Find a basis for S intersection T
so firstly i've determined S to be LI and T is also clearly LI so i won't bother
which meeans the provided spans (span = gen) are basis vectors for the subspaces
What do you think S and T look like as subspaces of R^3?
So SnT should be the intersection of those planes
that intersects them both
and we know that line
must go through 0
so.. i'm trying to think about it but
it would look something like
all linear combinations of S's vectors = all linear combinations of T's vectors?
something like that
I think you can easily find a normal vector to both those planes
uhh
i think we'd seen a method where
you write each basis vector as a column of a matrix
multiply each of those by a scalar
and equal them
so like
Ac=Bd
A,B the basis matrices
c,d any R scalar
Yeah I think this would essentially boil down to writing the planes S and T as
$S(s_1,t_1) = s_1 \vec{u_s} + t_1 \vec{v_s}$
and $T(s_2, t_2) = s_2\vec{u_t} + t_2 \vec{v_t}$
Azyrashacorki
And solving for the s1, t1, s2, t2 that make them equal
In any case the normal vectors approach is faster, but you do whichever works with what you've learned 
see the thing is
technically i know how to find the normal vectors
like that was part of my second linear alg exam
but i failed the first one
and we were taught to solve it a certain way
i asked my prof though and she said as long as we got a correct result with a process that made sense
we could solve it any way we wanted
which is cool becuase not all professors are like that
so... the normal vectors...
would be the orthogonal complement
That's nice of them honestly
Yeah
cross product rather
oh yeah
my bad
anyways one i have the normal vectors for each basis
they should be orthogonal to each other
Not necessarily
oh
The planes don't have to intersect orthogonally
But, remember that their intersection line lies in both planes
And both normal vectors are orthogonal to anything in the plane
sometimes visualizing it makes it easier for me
these are our two subspaces
that line is what we're trying to find
If you plot the normal vectors, you should be noticing something with the intersection
yeah im not quite sure how to do that in geogebra
okay i've plotted the line
as well as the normal vectors
each in its correspondin colors
oh
the... intersection vector
is normal to both normal vectors?
Indeed
The intersection lies in both planes, and both normal vectors are orthogonal to their respective planes.
In particular, they themselves must span a plane that is orthogonal to the intersection!
So then all you need is a vector perpendicular to both normal vectors
I mean you can also just cross product again
yeah well that’s essentially what regular internal product is, right?
<v,u> usually the inner product, which standardly corresponds to the dot product
okay hold on
i may be mixing up a few things here
it’s my understanding two vectors are orthogonal when <v,u> = 0
by cross product, do you mean the whole i j k thing?
Yes
The cross product of two vectors gives you a vector orthogonal to both of those you started with
it’s confusing cause we haven’t really used cross product in linear alg
yeah i remember the hand thingy
so i could either do cross product
or
<v1,u>=0
<v2,u>=0
i mean cross product is probably faster
just making sure
Okok from the beginning
Yeah that's how you'd do it otherwise
You'll get equations to solve for the coordinates of u
You also might run into a choice at some point since there are two vectors that are orthogonal to both of them
Just pick whichever it doesn't really matter
like, between each other
Yeahyeah exactly
they're linear combinations of each other
They're opposites
i'm just worried about using cross product because we might stumble into problems where
we're not in R3
and i haven't used cross product outside of R3
True. It's safer to use the inner product then
like in entry math we had what was called "line and plane"
which was... as the name would suggest
lines and planes in R3
and the operations between them
so since you were always in R3 you'd just use internal product
@open sage Has your question been resolved?
yup. thanks for the help
Closed by @open sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello I need help with some algebra 1 I didn’t take it my freshman year and now idk what I’m doing
ask a question
Ooo this
so I would start with simplifying the expression
do u know how to do that
Honestly no im not good at math
I’m taking this class again and I js can’t understand it
I think I do
okay so
we’d start with combining 4x and -2x
or basically add them together
bc they’re like terms
they both have the variable x
right
Imagine x = potato
Yes
so
simplifying 4x-7-2x
it would be
2x-7
you combine or add together 4x and -2x
Where do you get the 7 from
it was in the original problem I gave out lol
Oh I thought we were talking about my problem lol
nono I’m just using it as an example
I understand
the same concept also applies to here
the problem also contains distribution
do u know how to distribute??
It’s okay
ur just learning this
distribution is when u like, multiply multiple terms if that makes sense
for example
4(x+2)
if I ask u to distribute, what would ur answer be
No its four times x
8x??
Plus 4 times 2
So 4x + 8
Hope that makes some sense
What would -3(2x-1) be?
@queen mountain
I honestly have no idea
Divide the whole operation in two parts like I did earlier
Multiply 2x by -3
This produces- ?
You following, bud?
-3
Is it cause it’s negative times a negative?
Okay
What would the overall answer be then?
-6x right
If it helps u visualize better Chris
I’m really trying hard to understand this but math js makes my head hurt a lot
This is only the beginning lol, but trust, it’ll be a lot easier once u understand the basics
do u get how like terms and distribution works tho, right??
Idk that I can’t understand it even when taught and it js seems all clustered up
or do u want to practice a bit more
I sorta understand it
both concepts??
Why dont you give your problem a shot now?
yes
Putting this here so I don’t have to scroll
😭
Lol
Ok let’s try this
oh yes, watch out for this whenever u see a negative sign next to anything with parentheses
So I would do -1 x 6x ?
Yes and then -1 x 3 also
Ok then I add them when I finish that?
Yeah
Ok so -6x plus 3x?
-1 times 3 is -3
Oh okay
It would be -6x -3
So do I add them now?
Yeah
-3?
Dont give up yet
I don’t want to but me trying to actually learn this is difficult
It will be whole lotta simpler once you add up the like terms
Come on man this aint that bad 🗿
2x^2 and -6x^2 are like terms
Do you get this?
I think I do cause they have x in them
yes, but also, it’s x^2
which is different from just x
ppl sometimes mistake adding x and x^2 together when combining like terms
Add them up
add all ur like terms together
What do you get by adding 2x^2 and -6x^2
any terms with x^2 add together, any terms with x add together, and any terms that r just numbers add together
-4x^2
YUHHHHH
😭
okay any other like terms that should be added together??
I don’t think so
r u sure
am I missing something?