#help-17
1 messages · Page 243 of 1
Devil Wears Prada
-2 right
why would they cancel out
one side is dy/dx and the other side is -dy/dx
they don't cancel
asks for dy/dx
why not
i add dy\dx
to cancel it out
and do the same on the other side
so you have 2dy/dx on the other side
dy/dx = (y+2)/2
,w y = xy + x^2 + 1; dy/dx at x = -1
smh
ok so what do you need to find dy/dx now
find y
-y + 2
what
yes
y = (-1)y + 1 +1
exactly
add y to both sides
wait I think you didn't differentiate correctly then 😭
yea the derivative isn't right, it should be 2x
my differentiation would be dy/dx = dy/dx * x + dx/dx * y + 2x + 0
dy/dx = dy/dx*x + y +2x
dy/dx - x*dy/dx = y+2x
did you use product rule when you differentiated
dy/dx = (y+2x)/1-x ?
no
check my work
according to this it would then be dy/dx = -dy/dx + y - 2
which would then be 2dy/dx = y - 2
oh
so tis then
-1/2
u jsut arranged it differently
i made a mistake
its B
thanks
.close
Closed by @sinful pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im stuck on $\sqrt{y}$
Devil Wears Prada
what would that be
you can do u sub
whats that
[ \dv{\sqrt y}{x} = \dv{\sqrt y}{y} \cdot \dv{y}{x} ]
neon
chain rule
beautiful formatting I know
i dont understand that chain rule formatting
yeah im not trying to learn this texit stuff
how do i do chain rule here
u is sqrt(y)
wait did i die
Devil Wears Prada
i think so yes
Devil Wears Prada
👍
so is the asnwer D
no, it should look like this
this is the correct tangent
that eq isn't right
how did you get to that?
its not?
no, just that the slope should be -, and yours is positive
no
what is the correct diff
how did you go from $-\frac12x^{-\frac12} - \frac12y^{-\frac12}\frac{dy}{dx} = 0$ to that?
Sepdron
you can't move just the dy/dx, it's attached to the -1/2 y^(-1/2)
move the whole y term, then divide
$-\frac12x^{-\frac12} = \frac12y^{-\frac12}\frac{dy}{dx}$
Devil Wears Prada
ty
yup
and in order to find the slope of dy/dx at a certain point can i just input the given coordinate values into dy/dx
or do i have to use the original function
here you already have the x and y
so you can directly plug it in
ok
but if you don't have the y, you'd need to use the original equation
so the answer is B
mhm
that's what I used there
Closed by @sinful pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im asking about b
what would the integral bounds be if the triple integral is dzdydx
i can tell you what i came up with but im not sure if it's correct
@next meteor Has your question been resolved?
@next meteor Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey
wouldnt the remaning pens will be 40 instead of 20
he sells 20 out of the 40 at a profit of 20% and the pens left over at a loss of 60%
he make profit from 20 pens but loss from 40 pen . he sold only 60
then why here it say 20 from loss too ? because 20x12 is the profit
No way its "Devil Wears Prada"
@fresh compass Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would you solve this:
wtf is a pronumeral?
the x and h
okay. can we assume the base of the pyramid is a square?
yea
so x is the diagonal of the square
yes
can you compute that?
you are missing h yet
do you have x?
2.83?
ye
it goes from the middle of x, perpendicularly
yep
so now you got a right triangle
yeah
Closed by @silent wren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Solve without using L'Hôpital's rule. I'm assumming using just analysis and set theory. My attempts to multiply by conjugate always end in (5-x) either in nominator or denominator, and 0 in the opposite in each case, so (0/0) no matter what. I can't get rid of the root to analyze it easily either.
multiply by conjugate
both numerator and denominator contain square root so
multiply/divide by conjugate of numerator and also with denominator
Closed by @storm cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I solved this matrix to find "a" if Delta = 0, the calculations are correct. My only question is, what if I tried to do it with a column and not a row? Do I have to select a row?
@tranquil linden Has your question been resolved?
@tranquil linden Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
hi
@cobalt dagger Has your question been resolved?
i never had a problem ...
.close
Closed by @flat whale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does my answer look correct
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
can you close one of your channels
i did it now but it doesnt close i think its a glitch
thx
bot's just slow.
ok👍
@fallow topaz Has your question been resolved?
@fallow topaz Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For a non-negative intgere k evaluate $\sum_{j=0}^{k} 2^{k-j} {{k+j}\choose{j}}$
Sherif Player
What I see here is that this looks like a lot to binomial theorem of (2+1)^k
Except instead of K choose j we got k+j choose j
.close
Closed by @simple mason
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this 1/2sqrt(7) like 1/2sqrt(7) x (solution to 1 + solution to cos 2theta) or is it like 1/2sqrt(7) x solution to 1 x solution to cos 2theta
with x being multiplying
the first
a oki
but please write legibly
always get them mixed up lol
makes sense
you could use this input thingy
https://www.wolframalpha.com/
but latex would be the best
too much trouble typing it all out ngl...
knief
THAT IS SIMPLE?
yes
all of those curly brackets just confuse me lol
just type one character at a time
i mean you can create shortcuts to not have to use those i guess
but if i have some free time ill look into it
Closed by @midnight crag
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So what do I do here?
do you need to use this
^
awesome
or can you just use differentiation rules
,tex .diff rules
differentiation rules?
riemann
have you seen any of those
yeah, some
power rule?
im just trynna refresh before the test
yeah
alr
I just hope that I dont have to do it the long way during the test
thanks guys 🔥
.close
Closed by @woven path
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
the derivative only gives you the slope
tangent lines have the form (slope) * x + (y-intercept)
you still need to find y-intercept. that's when x=-5 comes in
so
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
find the angle between segment x and segment 34
use the fact that its a complementary angle
Complementary angle?
I think so, its text question transferred to a drawing and x is a person standing and 16 is a wall so i'm assuming that it is parallel
that seems like it would be
how would that help me find x?
you could find all the angles in the triangle
and then use trigonometry to find distance x?
yes
Closed by @keen grail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi guys I need help with question 1
F continuous in IR ; limx->+ ♾ of f(x) = l And Limx->- ♾ of f(x) = l’
Show that if ll’>0 then there exist a,b in IR^2 in which f(a)*f(b)> 0
tu as soit l > 0, l' < 0 ou l'inverse
Oui
si l > 0, tu peux trouver un a tel que f(a) > 0
Je l’avais resolu en utilisant la definiton du limite mais je veux savoir s’il y a une autre methode
Comment ?
def de la limite, trouve a tel que |f(a)-l| < l/2
(epsilon= l/2)
oui, dis juste que le cas non traité se fait de manière analogue
@autumn idol Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
its a simple question but im somehow struggling lmao
60 degree in standard position
Could you please clarify what is meant by "standard position"
@raw quail
an angle where the initial side lies on the x axis and the vertex is the origin point in the cordinate plane
Great, alright
do you know how many degrees are in one revolution
yup 360
no, i havent solved it yet
ohh okay
alright, well we're rotating it by two and a quarter revolutions
two and a quarter, that's 2.25
so we're rotating it by 2.25 * 360 degrees
are you getting this
yup
,w 2.25 * 360
and we're rotating it by 810 degrees anticlockwise
well, by rotating an angle by 360 degrees, nothing changes
ohh so its the quarter that makes a difference?
so in essence we're rotating it by 810 - 360*2 degrees anticlockwise
yep
which is 90 degrees, if i've done my arith right
yup quarter is supposed to be 90 i think
but none of the choices are 810
or is it an equivalent angle?
we're getting there
810 is not the answer
it was the angle we have to rotate it by
which is just 90 degree
rotating the angle 90 degree anticlokwise would yield this
an angle of 150 degrees
ahh i see, so if i ever get a question that mentions a rotation and a half, rotation and a quarter etc do i just ignore the whole rotation and solve it with the half or the quarter?
depends on what is asked, though when the opportunity arises now you should be able to save some time
can you do the 22nd question on your own now?
yeah i think its the 3rd quadrant?
indeed
3.5 revolutions
is nothing but 0.5 revolutions
which is a 180 degree turn
so your angle was initially in the first quadrant
flip it around, we get the third
done in seconds
alright thank you so much 
anytime
.close
Closed by @raw quail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i factor the original fuction
Closed by @blissful peak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me solve this?
@teal flame Has your question been resolved?
@teal flame Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
.close
Closed by @desert glen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So, how are you supposed to do these derivatives? Don't know math terms in English, I've asked my group about them, but they're not responding, so I'd like to know how to solve them
If possible, I'd like someone that knows Spanish to help
ola
en la mayoria se usan solo reglas de derivacion
se usan mayormente la regla de que la derivada es aditiva o algo asi, y la regla de potencia
hawk tuah differentiate that thang
Entonces solo las haría normales, en base a esas reglas?
@tulip peak Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @tulip peak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i use componentwise contiunity
rhurhuzz ☆
and i thought that should prove it but that doesnt use the conitnuity of f at all so im not really sure
@opal quarry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can somebody help me with
Ive done 2πS=rh+r^2
to get rid of the bracket
what do i do next
move the r squared to the other side?
@sacred jewel Has your question been resolved?
thats the same answer as stockadvisor gave you
oh
mhm
You just need to bring that solitary -r over the denominator 2pi*r, and then they would look the same
alr
Closed by @sacred jewel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i 15
now that you have access to the determinant you have a simple test for invertibility
i know if (k-3) and (k-2) = 2 or -2
Well det(A) = 0, A not invertible
det(A) can only be 0 if i know if (k-3) and (k-2) = 2 or -2
but how do i find the k here
whats det of a 2x2 ?
1/ad-bc
no, that is 1/det(A)
Thats for invert calcul we don't actually need it here
But you got det(A) right so what does it gives if u equal it to zero ?
@lime kraken Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find all the real numbers α where ∀ n ∈ ℕ* we have ⌊α⌋ + ⌊2α⌋ + ... + ⌊nα⌋ is a multiple of n
Start by considering cases on floor(2a) and plugging in n = 2
so we should have ⌊α⌋ + ⌊2α⌋ ≡ 0 (mod 2)
What is N*?
positive integers different to 0
Ohh
so ⌊α⌋ and ⌊2α⌋ must both be odd or both even
You can't say
why
Does 1.9 satisfy the condition of a?
floor(1.9) + floor(3.8) = 4
3 is not a multiple of 2
3.8 not 2.8
,w floor(1.9) + floor(3.8) + floor(5.7) + floor(7.6) + floor(9.5) + floor(11.4) + floor(13.3) + floor(15.2) + floor(17.1) + floor(19) + floor(20.1)
No condition on a
Not a multiple of 11
No, why?
10 does work
12?
yes
I want to see if it is working with n where n is an even number
,w floor(1.9) + floor(3.8) + floor(5.7) + floor(7.6) + floor(9.5) + floor(11.4) + floor(13.3) + floor(15.2) + floor(17.1) + floor(19) + floor(20.9) + floor(22.8)
why does value of n matter
The parity of n doesn't matter much
hmm
hint: let $\alpha = k + \epsilon$ where $k$ is integer and $0\le \epsilon < 1$
we got ⌊α⌋ + ⌊2α⌋ = 2k
Astar777
What can floor(2a) equal in what cases?
depends on this inequality:
α - ⌊α⌋ ... 0.5
Right, floor(2a) = 2floor(a) if floor(a) <= a < floor(a) + 1/2 and floor(2a) = 2floor(a) + 1 if floor(a) + 1/2 <= a < floor(a) + 1
like if α = 1.4
⌊2α⌋ = 2 = ⌊α⌋ + 1
but if α = 1.6
⌊2α⌋ = 3 = ⌊α⌋ + 2
this is where α is positive
I didn't get it
,, \floor{x} = x - {x}
Astar777
right?
what does {x} represent?
fractional part function
For positive numbers yes
yes that what I was going to say
For negatives it's 1 - decimal part
For -3.4 it's 0.6 lmao
Consider these cases in floor(a) + floor(2a) = 0 mod 2
Yes
in the first case ⌊2α⌋ = 2⌊α⌋ or 2 + ⌊α⌋ ???
In the first case floor(2a) = 2floor(a) and in the second case floor(2a) = 2floor(a) + 1
Right
so in this case
α ∈ ... U [-4, -3.5[ U [-2, -1.5[ U [0, 0.5[ U [2, 2.5[ U ...
What about the second case?
That's correct
Now, for each case separately, plug in n = 3, 4, ...; Each time try narrowing the inequality of a down and at some point you should notice a pattern
α ∈ ... U [-5, -4.5[ U ....
combining the first and the second one
α ∈ ... U [-5, -4.5[ U [-4, -3.5[ U ...
👌
⌊3α⌋ = 3⌊α⌋ if ⌊α⌋ ≤ α < ⌊α⌋ + ⅓ ?
Yes, but what if floor(a) + 1/3 <= a < floor(a) + 1/2?
you mean in the end + ⅔ ?
No
huh
Let's stay in the case floor(a) <= a < floor(a) + 1/2
mod 3
oh wait I forgot it is mod 3 not 2
Can you express this using an inequality?
Yes
You see how the inequality has narrowed down?
We had floor(a) <= a < floor(a) + 1/2 now it became that
You may check yourself that the same happens at every n after that
Now prove this pattern (by induction) and conclude what a should be equal to
⌊nα⌋ = n⌊α⌋
if ⌊α⌋ ≤ α < ⌊α⌋ + 1/n ?
Yes
and if we have this? then
⌊(n-1)α⌋ = (n-1)⌊α⌋ ?
since 1/n is less than 1/(n-1)
idk if this is helpful
Yes, the same will hold for all positive integers <= n consequently
yes
Okay, anyway, now use induction to show that floor(na) = nfloor(a) for all positive integers n
Proof by induction of a statement for positive integers is a proof involving two steps. You show that the statement holds for the number 1 and then you show that the statement being true for some positive integer k implies it to also be true for k+1
means
for n = 2:
...
for n = 3:
...
in general for any positive integer n different to 0:
...
is that what you meant?
⌊nα⌋ = n⌊α⌋
if ⌊α⌋ ≤ α < ⌊α⌋ + 1/n
⌊nα⌋ = n⌊α⌋ + 1
if ⌊α⌋ + 1/n ≤ α < ⌊α⌋ + (n-1)/n
wait I didn't understand too much
back to n = 3
we said if ⌊α⌋ ≤ α < ⌊α⌋ + ⅓
so:
⌊α⌋ + ⌊2α⌋ + ⌊3α⌋ ≡ 0 (mod 3)
⌊α⌋ + 2⌊α⌋ + 3⌊α⌋ ≡ 0 (mod 3)
6⌊α⌋ ≡ 0 (mod 3)
which is always true
if ⌊α⌋ ≤ α < ⌊α⌋ + ⅓
You don't need to assume anything here
means in the first case
α ∈ ... U [-3, -2.6666...[ U [-2, -1.6666...[ U [0, 0.3333...[ U [1, 1.3333[ U ...
why
We know that floor(a) + floor(2a) + floor(3a) = 0 mod 3
We know that floor(2a) = 2floor(a)
Plugging in, you get floor(3a) = 0 mod 3, right?
or 2⌊α⌋ + 1?
Let's stay in the first case for now
Doing both simultaneously will make things difficult
ok
floor(3a) can only ever be equal to 3floor(a), 3floor(a) + 1, 3floor(a) + 2
Which one of these possibilities satisfies floor(3a) = 0 mod 3?
yes
3⌊α⌋
Right, so floor(3a) = 3floor(a)
yes
For practice before writing the proof, try showing floor(4a) = 4floor(a) with floor(a) + floor(2a) + floor(3a) + floor(4a) = 0 mod 4
You are missing some steps
before?
Can't just right from 6floor(a) + floor(4a) = 0 mod 4 to floor(4a) = 0 mod 4
Right, but what about mod 4?
6⌊α⌋ + ⌊4α⌋ ≡ 0 (mod 4)
since 6⌊α⌋ ≡ 0 (mod 2)
means ⌊4α⌋ ≡ 0 (mod 2)
How does 6floor(a) = 0 mod 2 imply floor(4a) = 0 mod 2?
logicly?
Ah that yes
no?
But why are you doing mod 2
6foor(a) = 2floor(a) mod 4
Since floor(a) is even, think about possible values of 2floor(a) mod 4
didn't get it
first line
6⌊α⌋ + ⌊4α⌋ ≡ 0 (mod 4)
6 = 2 mod 4, right?
So 6floor(a) = 2floor(a) mod 4
Now think about the possible values of 2floor(a) mod 4 given that floor(a) is even
⌊α⌋ multiple of 2?
Yeah
That's true, yes
so
@mellow wigeon Has your question been resolved?
@mellow wigeon Has your question been resolved?
bro I didn't get it
for n = 2
α ∈ ... U [-4.5 , -3.5[ U [-2.5 , -1.5[ U [-0.5 , 0.5[ U [2.5 , 3.5[ U ...
for n = 3
α ∈ ... U [-5.3333, -4.6666[ U [-4.3333, -3.66666[ U [-3.3333, -2.6666[ U ...
for n = 4
α ∈ ... U [-4.25, -3.75[ U [-3.5, -3.3333[ U [-2.666, -2.5[ U [-2.25, -1.75[ U [-1.5, -1.3333[ U [-0,6666, -0,5[ U ...
I see no relation between the values of n
please help me
<@&286206848099549185>
find all the real numbers α ∀ n ∈ ℕ*
⌊α⌋ + ⌊2α⌋ + ... + ⌊nα⌋ is a multiple of n
I got something
if n is odd
α ∈ [⌊α⌋, ⌊α⌋+1/n[ U [⌊α⌋+(n-1)/n , ⌊α⌋+1[
I have no proof
just I realised that for n = 3
I got
α ∈ [⌊α⌋, ⌊α⌋+⅓[ U [ ⌊α⌋+⅔, ⌊α⌋+1[
ans for n = 5 I got
α ∈ [⌊α⌋, ⌊α⌋+⅕[ U [⌊α⌋+⅘, ⌊α⌋+1[
I didn't try n = 7 tbh but I guess it is the same
pleaseeeeeee helppp
find all the real numbers α ∀ n ∈ ℕ*
⌊α⌋ + ⌊2α⌋ + ... + ⌊nα⌋ is a multiple of n
pleaseeeee helpppppp
<@&286206848099549185>
That’s imo last year
imo p1
is this correct first?
hope you remember me
it's a imo problem, there are many resolutions on youtube
yeah
can you send me link
@mellow wigeon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do you want to solve x ?
i think its -5
u can try verifying that
by substituting it into x in the equation
look put 1 to the left side
so you get an equation equal to 0
then you put 1 in the fraction
If a/b = 1 then a = b neccessarly
So you solve for x² + x -30 = x-5
Which is quite forward to sol, despite a little trap to avoid falling in
alternatively, just factor the numerator
Closed by @tropic dock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have the function given in the picture
now my question is how can I shorten the function
is e^-4x²-1 (15sin(-3x + 1/6π) - 40xcos(-3x+1/6π)) correct?
is this more correct?
Looks good
@plush summit Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @plush summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so the body K is limited by the curves at the top
and we're supposed to calculate the volume
the only thing I'm struggling with is how they figured out what the value of theta had to be?
Like I get that we can describe the dxdy as a circle with x = rcos(phi) and y = rsin(phi) if we let phi go between 0 and 2pi and r = 1
but how do we know what value theta has to be for z to not "go outside" the boundaries when we integrate?
and how do we know what to integrate when we actually integrate as well? very confused :C
never really understood why/how you put a 1 in the first one for example
like I do see how we can get theta
if we set sqrt(x^2+y^2) = sqrt(1-x^2-y^2)
then we can get x^2+y^2=1-x^2-y^2 = 2(x^2+y^2) = 1
x^2+y^2 = 1/2
so we should be intersecting at a circle with the radius 1/sqrt(2)
Theta represents the angle from the z axis to a given point.
Here it's delimited by 0 and pi/4 because the cone opens at angle pi/4.
In general, you could find that value by solving for the intersection.
x^2 + y^2 = 1/2 gives you z^2 (from the first equation)
Then you can find r since you have a value for x^2 + y^2 + z^2
So now you have values for z and r and you can solve for theta in z = r cos(theta)
uhhh wait
so assuming i don't know that a cone opens at angle pi/4
i can set the restrictions to be equal to each other to know the intersection, yeah?
and then I know that x^2+y^2=1/2
z will be the sqrt of that
and how would I know that? a lot of numbers in my head atm
from the first equation?
but in either case, how do I get theta from this?
or are you saying the idea is to do
Yes. We have $x^2 + y^2 = \frac{1}{2}$ and $z = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}$.
Azyrashacorki
Then the point is that $r = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}$ at the intersection
and then find the numbers that I can know, like r and phi
Azyrashacorki
And you know what $x^2 + y^2$ is and you know what $z^2$ is.
Then in the last equation you know r and z, and you can solve for theta
Azyrashacorki
i'm just a bit afraid of reusing the same values :x
but essentially then
set equations equals to each other to find out where they intersect
and that value would be what z is at the intersection?
You just need the last equatino
then go back to z = r cos theta, and assuming i set it up like i did where 0<=r<=1 and 0<=phi<=2pi
i get 1/sqrt(2) = cos(theta) ?
which is 45 degrees or pi/4 radians
Yes that's the gist of it
ok i think i'm with you on that part then, could you explain how they then proceed to set up the triple integral?
where do we get the 1 from in the leftmost one?
The full working looks like $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}= \sqrt{x^2 + y^2}=z = r\cos(\theta) = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2} \cos(\theta) = \sqrt{\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2}}\cos(\theta) = \cos(\theta)$
Azyrashacorki
Anyways
r is defined as sqrt(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)
i.e. the distance from the origine to (x,y,z)
Yes
Okok
You put 1 in the integral just do show that you're just integrating dxdydz.
Really you're integrating dV, which is small pieces of volumes
But that's because dxdydz = dV
For areas you're integrating dxdy, which is units of area dA.
yes
You can think of dxdy as small pieces of area made up of rectangles with length dx and width dy
Then dxdydz is a small piece of volume made of a prism with length dx, width dy and height dz
i more meant if I should have the 1 in those cases as well
ok then i think i understand what you're trying to say
it's just the conventional way of expressing that we intend to calculate the volume
ok but then for the next step, r^2sintheta dr dtheta dphi, is that from the "functional determinant"?
Yes. Literally, you are integrating the constant function 1 over a certain domain. That gives you the volume contained in there
not sure if you have that term in english
Yes that comes from the Jacobian determinant that pops out of transforming into spherical coordinates
and then for the next part we just seperate them into their own to make it easier to integrate?
is there any case when it's not ok to split them up into their own integrals?
ok managed to do it now
thank you so much!
hope you have an amazing day 
.close
Closed by @vital latch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello I have a question
If I want to find E(X) using g(X) I need to have g(X) = a function in terms of x only ?
Then E(X)= integral of x g(x) dx?
From negative infinity of positive infinity
a real number?
well then g(X)=that real number and E(some real number) = that real number
so you mean that you have a random variable Y=g(X) and you know g and then want to find E(X) ?
hopefully g is invertible
I have a probability density function
f(x,y)
I found g(x) and h(y)
but I want to find E(x) using g(x)
you presumably mean something by specifically using the notation g(x) but I dont know what you mean
do you mean that its the density of x?
so then its derivative is the density of x?
the marginal distribution of x my bad
g(x)
which is the integral from negative infinity to positive infinity of f(x,y) dy
ok at least the question is clearer now. I think yes but its been some time since I've done that kinda stuff
@bright nacelle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the center of mass should have x=y=0 right?
it would be if the density was the same throughout
oh nevermind
you're correct in that aspect
I didn't realize it was in 3d
i just need to find z then
yep
so for the total mass, I should have 2 triple integrals right? The first with bounds 0<r<R. 0<theta<2pi. -R<z<h.
the second with 0<r<R. 0<theta<2pi. h<z<R?
well that makes it seem like you're using cylindrical coordinates, but this is a sphere
so you need spherical coords
hm
i dont think ive been taught that yet
I suppose i'll come back to this after it gets taught in lecture then
sounds good lol
i dont think we'll learn about it until tomorrow, so im just gonna close this channel. dont need to hog it for no reason lol
.close
Closed by @fickle apex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why isn't the derivative defined on sharp turns like the middle part in the absolute value function
how would you define it?
One intuitive reason is what would the tangent look like?
if there even is the tangent
Umm i think it would be a straight line
I dont

any line that intersects that corner works
so there isn't any unique "tangent line"
(Indeed, if you remember that the definition of the derivative is supposed to be the limit of the difference quotient [where it exists], you’d notice on either side the limits aren’t the same)
So in that sense, if derivatives were defined in terms of the slope of its tangents, then the derivative at that point is not well defined
So even our intuitive notion of a derivative does not apply here
Umm so what
Remember you have the derivative of f at a being the limit of, say, (f(x) - f(a))/(x - a) as x gets closer to a
But if that limit exists, it needs to be the same from either side
Umm I think they approach 0 from both directions
From the left, you get -1, from the right, you get +1
Think about what the slope of the pairs of points you get for some negative x and the origin, and also some positive x and the origin
But isn't the slope like always different from both directions when u find the derivative
Unless it's like a straight line idk
In many of the exercises you’ve done, you’ve shown that they become the same from either side as you get closer and closer to the point you’re considering
Remember the first few here #help-7|zen1thxyz message we found the limits actually existing
Whereas here it doesn’t 
Ohh
Wat Abt like extrema
As in derivatives at extrema? You’d find the derivative to be zero if it exists there 
umm how come it doesn't work here
It it bcuz it doesn't like curve
To like get so close to each other
Because of the “if it exists there” basically
nothing guarantees the derivative exists at extrema, but if it does, it must be zero
@fallen sandal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to do
yea you're supposed to integrate del f(x,y) wrt to a variable
@velvet cove Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @velvet cove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
send your question
closed your other channel
are the numbers just numbers in the base of the subscript?
$10_8 = 8_{10}$ ?
riemann
yes
just convert all the numbers to the same base and add
no idea what F and C in base 16 are
C is 12, F 15
F = 15, C = 12
haha sniped
damn it
To add numbers that are in different bases, it's highly recommended to convert all the number to the same base, this will allow you to add the numbers conveniently.
You can also watch my previous lesson on how to convert numbers to other bases via the link below:
https://youtu.be/mZptOFStXwU
If you find this video interesting, kindly subscribe ...
oh hex okay
if you can do addition, you can evaluate f(x, y)
$f(3_{10}, 10_8) = 3_{10} + 10_8 + 0101_2$
riemann
is the converting hard or the addition?
i believe in you
@tepid forge Has your question been resolved?
@tepid forge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
HELP
we can't do the work for you but we can help, where are you stuck?
@frigid mason Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Kinetic converts to potential:
no
I already started a new room, sorry xP
Post your question in one of the help channels that are available. (Channel group above this one)
okk tysm
@livid void Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> xP
😭
Can't help? @vast shale
So a friend of mine somehow brute forced the answer just typing in integers. Apparently its 0.78 but the only way I know to work it leads to 0.52
@livid void Has your question been resolved?
@livid void Has your question been resolved?
@livid void Has your question been resolved?
@livid void Has your question been resolved?
@livid void Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
😮💨
im not that at home in these kinds of questions but i think i know the correct way of solving it using these formulas.
i used
u_s*m*g=kd
w_tot=K_f-K_i=1/2*m*v_2^2-1/2m*v_1^2
w_tot=w_spring+w_fric=-1/2*k*d^2-u_k*m*g*d
(idk how to use the bot to make these show as actual formulas)
@livid void
idk what wtot is, but this is what I did
unless that means total weight