#help-17
1 messages · Page 233 of 1
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
indefinite integral of sin3θ
@=theta
-cos3@.@²/2 ?
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
I didn't write it in presentable form that's why I was only making a simple question out of it and asking here
how did you get cos(3t).t^2/2?
for sin(3t)
or did you mean t*sin(3t)
which is still wrong
ok I get what you did but
- it's sin(3t) not sin(t)
- the integral of the product is not the product of the integrals
just a small counterexample
indefinite integral of 1
it's just x right?
or whatever the variable is
well
1 = 1*1
1 integrates to x
1 integrates to x
so 1 integrates to x*x = x^2?
?
the integral of the product is not the product of the integrals
where is product
its only sin3t
what
isn't there chain rule like differentiation in integration
first we see sin then we see theta
you can only reverse the chain rule, not create a new one
f(g(x)) differentiates to f'(g(x)) * g'(x)
which means
f'(g(x)) * g'(x) integrates to f(g(x))
however
nothing was said about integrating f'(g(x)) or f(g(x))
what you should do
is a variable change
is there shortcut to do without substitution
generally, no
unless you already know the integral
which here you don't
can u tell what I did wrong
.
you tried to create a semblance of "chain rule" for integration
which doesn't exist
the point of substitution
is to figure out where the "f'(g(x)) * g'(x)" was in the expression
here you have sin(3t)
you know sin integrates to -cos
but in order to integrate sin(3t)
you need to multiply it by g'(x)
g(t) = 3t
g'(t) = 3
so sin(3t) * 3
is finally of this form
so it integrates to f(g(x))
or -cos(3t)
which means
dividing by 3 again
sin(3t) integrates to
-cos(3t)/3
this trick only worked because g'(x) was a constant
(using the linearity of the integral)
g'(x) is a constant when g(x) = ax + b
so whenever you have to integrate f(at+b)
it's gonna be 1/a * F(at+b)
int sin3t = int t.sin3t ?
but you said this
is this t*sin(3t)?
no, we multiplied by 3 to get the form "f'(g(x)) * g'(x)"
we had to undo it afterwards
int sin3t = 1/3 int 3.sin3t
can u ot talk in variables, I don't understand
ok
we have a chain rule for differentiation
we want to rewrite what we got
so we can "undo" chain rule
yes
so we multiplied by a constant to recognize that
and then divided by the same constant further down
and we were allowed to do that
because it's a constant
if it were a non constant function it wouldn't have worked
like
this is a very reduced example but
x^2 differentiates to 2x
i want to know $\int xdx$
rafilou2003
if I multiply by 2, I get 2x
which integrates to x^2
divide by 2 to "undo" what I did
and my original integral is x^2/2
(+ constant)
u are multiply 2 inside integral?
shouldn't it be x²/2
2x integrates to x^2
because x^2 differentiates to 2x
oh ok
as I said this is a really weird example
but just to show
I can multiply by some constant INSIDE the integral
as long as I divide by that same constant OUTSIDE
yes
$\int ...dx = \frac 1a \int a\cdot...dx$
rafilou2003
which is what we did in your question
$\int sin(3t)dt = \frac 13 \int 3sin(3t)dt$
rafilou2003
why did we do this
is because this form specifically
allows us to "undo" chain rule
isn't this way a lot of brain consuming
no
I mean
I'll have to think first about what will the differentiation of inside function (3t) and then multiply divide by it
but here it's only 3t
but what if something bigger comes
what do I do after this
also.my teacher said that integrating sin will give zero if limit is of full cycle
it'll be because, sin3t and we put 2π/3=t, it'll become sin2π and it's integration will be zero?
@boreal wren Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What's the difference between line, surface and volume integrals? As I understand it line integrals give the area under a line or curve like basic 2d integration. Surface integrals give a volume but don't volume integrals do that? What is going on?
in 1-variable integration, the only choice of region to integrate over is an interval of the number line. however in 3D space, we can choose many types of regions to integrate. these include curves (1D), surfaces (2D), and solid regions (3D).
none of these necessarily give "area under a curve" in the same way, but they can still have other useful interpretations
so what is the difference between line and surface integrals?
a line integral integrates over a curve in space like a helix (first picture) and a surface integral integrates over a surface like a hyperbolic paraboloid (second picture)
i thought line integrals integrated like this
so a line integral can only give an area under a curve?
and surface integrals can cover a surface then?
that's an interpretation which only applies to curves in the xy-plane. but the curves can potentially be in 3d space as well
have you got an example of a line integral and surface integral over the same shape?
the regions that a line integral does are curves (think like a bent wire) and the regions that a surface integral does are surfaces (think like a bent piece of paper)
so they integrate fundamentally different things. the closest you could get is integrating over a surface and its boundary curve
so theoretically they could both integrate the same area?
if for example we have a 3d cube, we could get the surface integral of a face and then define a path through a face that would then allow the line integral to give us that face's area
the "area above the curve" interpretation only holds for curves in 2D space (visualized as the xy-plane in the image). it does not really apply to curves in 3D space
i don't understand
this is a 2d area curving around 3d space
the only difference between the yellow area and this, is that in the yellow area you can always draw a straight line from both ends of the area
that is a 2D curve (in the xy plane) with the value of a function being interpreted as the height
you can do a line integral of a function of (x,y,z) over a 3D curve, yes. you just don't get the "area over a curve" interpretation
have you got an example that isn't the helix, cause that is kinda confusing
lets say we have a piece of wire bent into a semicircle like the figure. we also have a function f(x,y,z) which is the mass density of the wire. integrating that function over the semicircle would give the mass of the wire
alternatively, if we integrate f(x,y,z) = 1, we would get the arc length
@lyric shadow Has your question been resolved?
so this is the line integral?
that's the curve. the line integral is an integral using that curve as the region of integration, like how a 1D integral uses a portion of the number line as the region of integration
sorry man, still not getting it
i think i'm going to see some videos to see if i can visualize it better
@lyric shadow Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lyric shadow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
please i need the limit of this integral. i cant use convergence dominance or anything letting me to put the limit inside the integral
i know that Wn>W(n+1) and that Wn>0 but i dont know if it will help
You want to show that the integrand becomes infinitely small for n-> inf. Here the x = 0 is the problem. So I'd split the integral into two: One from 0 to epsilon/2 and one from epsilon/2 to π/2. Then you can find upper bounds those two integrals separately
but the problem will remain with the one from 0 to epsilon/2 no ?
and why exactly epsilon/2 ?
We want to bound the whole integral by epsilon (for any epsilon > 0)
(what bound means please ?)
Well, 0 < cos(x) < 1 in this interval. So you can find an upper bound for this one by just using this 🙂
I'm sorry, but I don't understand?
Maybe this is actually a false translation by my side.
bound means like find inequalities for
so we're trying to show i.e.
-n <= W_n <= n or smth like that etc.
anyway that's what we mean by bound
i dont know, i dont study maths in english
aaah ok thanks
Thx, I was already doubting my english skills. I don't either
(obviously not those inequalities, but like just finding some inequalities)
so if i get it
i can separate the integral
and find something bigger than each integral ?
Yes
any idea about it ? it looks difficult something that exactly fits
like bigger and having a limit going to
I basically already told you how to do the left one
sorry i really dont find that
if you have no problem with that, could you just write on a paper just the beggining of what you would do after splitting the integral to make this easier ?
my english doesnt help but maths in universal
Unfortunately, there is just one more line after the split
which is 😭 ?
But let's do the first integral from 0 to epsilon/2 together
okay im here
Here we can just use the fact that cos^n(x) =< 1 to bound this above by the integral of 1 over [0, epsilon/2]
wait to be sure
the integral of 1 over 0, epsilon/2 is epsilon/2 ?
bcz the primitive of 1 is x
and with the borders we get epsilon/2 ?
Yes
So we did the first one 🙂
The second one is your job. I don't want to give you the full solution. But you can have some hints if you want
okay thanks, i will ping you if i dont find the solution
Maybe ping helpers. I might already be sleeping then
@vale garden Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@strange zodiac Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
help-8, help-10, and help-48 are open rooms
Oh okay thank you
Closed by @strange zodiac
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know its either option 1 or 3
@patent abyss Has your question been resolved?
@patent abyss Has your question been resolved?
The function f is defined on all values of x. The function g is defined as g(x) = f (x + 1) – f (x), and the function h is defined as h(x) = g(x + 1) – g(x). If h(x) = –4 for all values of x, which of the following conclusions is correct?
@patent abyss Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Did she mean C - (R_ U {0})?
the logarithm is defined for 0 right
ln(0)?
they should have excluded 0 yesh
oh ok
just wanted to make sure
Ok I assume I'd have to show log satisfies the cauchy reiman equations for those restrictions
but how do I write log as u(z) + iv(z)?
im not sure if u have to do that?
im still in highschool so i will use what methods im aware of, they might be tedious tho
could be possible that 0 is included in R_
depending on convention 
so we are interested in log(z) being analytic on what domain
we just need to show domain of z is s.t. |z|>0 and its in principle argument
i think thats the conditions at least for log(z) being analytic
do you have a definition of the principal branch of the logarithm?
how does your course define it
because to show analyticity, you need to show that log(z) has a complex derivative
so depending on your definitions, this might either be completely trivial or require a long computation
right
forgot about that
you need to show that has a complex derivative away from the negative real axis
can show it satisfies cr equations using (r,theta)
oh i didnt even realise this was called cauchy riemann equation lol
learnt something new today
@crisp zenith Has your question been resolved?
Does this seem about right?
r is greater than 1 right?
Actually Greater than or equal to
.close
Closed by @crisp zenith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im not sure its right
When u put infinity
(x+5) positive
x-4 also positive
(x+4) also positive
But there is negative sign
So it will become negative infinity
where
-3(
k
Mhm
+inf turns whatever - into +
Closed by @stiff dove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey just a quick question but a directional derivative exists when all partials of a given function equal to zero, or in other words the limits of all partial derivatives equal to zero?
@random widget Has your question been resolved?
@random widget Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @random widget
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain how the integral is introduced in the final step
@heavy pollen Has your question been resolved?
@heavy pollen Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
@heavy pollen Has your question been resolved?
good now?
@heavy pollen Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
What's the question
Oh nvm
Try understanding it for one dimensional x first
Gradient of f is just the derivative of f. What do you get when you integrate the second derivative of f?
Closed by @heavy pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Math gods, i summon you 😭
try listing out the powers of seven
sounds painful
oh, it's surprisingly not that bad
it’s not
powers of seven are known to behave nicely (mod 100)
powers of 7? upto ?
I'd expect the cycle to be much longer
Result:
2401
yes, 07 comes after that
Result:
7
you're right
yeah i saw the solution, its 7⁴ but i don't get it why
Do you know modulo?
u have to make it approachable
so if you start with something that seems natural
can't seen to remember
then after you find a pattern/ interesting observation, build a function to put it into an expression
that helps more
no, i dont remeber
Yeah, the pattern is often not so simple
alright, what are the last 2 digits of 7^1?
but now they know to look for something similar in other numbers
07?
Yeah, what about 7^2
49
7^3?
343
yes, and last 2 digits are 43
oh sorry, i panicked
now if we wanted to compute last 2 digits of 7^4, it would suffice to do 7*43 and take the last 2 digits of that
np, you dont have to panick btw. Take your time
,calc 7*43
Result:
301
I used euler's theorem, since phi(100)=40 and 2008 mod 40 is 8, that means you can square 7 three times.
7^2 = 49 mod 100
(50-1)^2 = 1 mod 100
1^2=1 mod 100
nice approach, but i think the OP doesnt know modulo
they should learn
sorta, when working under modulo 100, numbers like 343, 43, or even 53143 are considered to be "the same"
so we only focus on last 2 digits when doing adding them, multiplying them etc
and there are some nice theorems that simplify work with modulos
you dont necessarily need it here though
yeah this is number theory, all of these are about computing remainders, you really should know modulo to be working these
sure, it's called "modular arithmetic" or in general, "number theory", which also has many concept outside of modular arithmetic
this particular task can be done without it though
thanks, i will check
u mean an easier alternative?
the way without modulos is essentially just rewording an approach with modulos in a way that it doesnt use modulos
so just to finish the solution, we have:
7^1 = 7 ----- 07
7^2 = 49 ----- 49
7^3 = 343 ----- 43
7^4 = 2401 ----- 01
The key note here is that to compute last 2 digits of following powers, it suffices to take the last 2 digits of the previous power and multiply them by 7.
So e.g. instead of doing 2401 * 7 to compute 7^5, it suffices to compute 01 * 7 = 07
and so last 2 digits of 7^5 will be 07
but then, last 2 digits of 7^6 will be 49
and the cycle will repeat
07 -> 49 -> 43 -> 01 -> 07 -> 49 -> 43 -> 01 -> 07...
similar approach would work for all numbers, but the cycle would usually be much much much longer
it could have up to 100 terms before it starts repeating
7 has a very short cycle, yes
poor 7
there might be some other numbers with short cycles
the length of this cycle of n is called "the order of n" in number theory
Closed by @frank ivy
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help in finding what this equation I just came up with is called, I’m pretty sure it’s probably been thought of before because it’s really simple but I can’t find anything about it online. The top equation in the first picture is defining the variables for the equations formatted like the ones in the questions in the second picture. The second equation of the first picture is defining how to calculate the (x+…)^2+(y+…)^2 equations as shown in the second picture written in pencil. If my writing is unclear just ask me to type it out for you. Copy of my last question because it was closed with no resolution.
@woeful plank Has your question been resolved?
@woeful plank Has your question been resolved?
oh thats a pretty cool derivation
i did that also for fun
idk if it has a name
i dont think so
but its pretty common
but you made a mistake
its not equal to the absolute value
cause you cant have negative radius
in the case of negative radius, the equation isnt a circle
@woeful plank
Yah, idk why I put that. I’m too tired lol
hahah all good
@woeful plank Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @woeful plank
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
bro how did they simplify the numerator into a 12 😭
you do the distributive on the top and it's -20 + 4h + 20 so like how is 4 getting tripled
does it have to do with the weird combining of the denominators
The numerator is equal to $$\frac{4(-5+h)(-5+3)}{(-5+h)+3} -\frac{4(-5)((-5+h)+3)}{(-5+h+3)(-5+3)}$$
Civil Service Pigeon
,w 4(-5+h)(-5+3)-4(-5)((-5+h)+3)
ive been staring at this the whole time and i have no idea how you got there
i mean im bad at simplification so that's to be expected but i genuinely am at a loss
i dont have wolfram alpha pro either so i cant see their step by step
ive seen multiplying a fraction by another fraction with same numerator and denominator, but ive never seen multiplying two fractions' numerators by each other's denominators
no wait that is what you did to the right fraction
so i get the right fraction cause you're trying to match the denominator of the left fraction... but you dont change the left fraction's denominator? and there's a random (-5 + 3) being added to the left fraction's numerator?
<@&286206848099549185> can someone pretty please hold my hand through this i dont know how to simplify very well
.reopen
@formal meteor Has your question been resolved?
still working on this one?
yes
ok
well
do you know how to subtract/add two fractions together if their denominators are different?
you multiply both of them by a fraction of each other's denominators in the numerator and denominator
so you get a common denominator and it becomes easy right
something like that right
sorry it's kinda messy it's a bit hard to avoid with these things
@jovial bloom what do i do now i still dont see the light
alrighty
i havent done the right side yet cause it's really weird looking but is this like what it should look like?
the denominator of the right fraction would also be 2h + 4 cause they're the same and all that, it's just the numerator i dont really know about
wait
why is the first line of this different to the question?
huh it looks the same, i just copied the numerator part
why have you written 4(-5h + h) instead of 4(-5 + h) in the first numerator?
also you should be simplifying like terms when you can
-2 is quicker to write than (-5+3)
i figured id need to keep it like that for distributive property shenanigans
because my simplification skills are lacking so sometimes my instincts arent good
currently here
at the start i dont really see why i cant just make the right fraction a whole number and put it in the left numerator and make it one fraction
but the guy who posted the vague answer at the start didnt so idk
is this anything
ok but 40 - 40 isn't 80
it's 2 positive 40s
or am i crazy
i definitely wanted those 40s to simplify out LOL
You forgot to distribute the negative
which
That’s just the top portion but hopefully it’s clear
The whole right side is being subtracted
Then it should come out to 12h
oh shit the minus sign between the two fractions gets distributed??
Yea
that always messes me up i still dont fully have a grip on that one
does that always apply when subtracting fractoins
Yea
Np
being in calc 1 and not knowing basic simplification is embarassing but we live we grow we move
that's all adios
.close
Closed by @formal meteor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know I have to use the properties of orthonormal sets (orthogonality and normality) to show that it is LI. How would I use properties of orthonormal bases to show that the subset B is LI using the operations defined on the inner product space?
sps that av_1 + etc. = 0
now try dotting that with v_1 and seeing what u get
hi im having trouble with this one question its for homework its about finding the slope
oh kk
guys im still needing help
which channel do i use
kk tysm
two categories , math help available math help occupied
use a channel in the math help available one
sorry jar jar I got no clue
ohh kk
So i take the dot product of <sum(av),v_1> and get ||av_1||=|a|||v_1||=a right?
what happened when i tried to type in the norm operator?
yeah
|| || are spoilers in discord
then since 0 dot anything = 0
ohhhh okay.
because sum(av)=0?
yh (cus we wanna show av_1 + bv_2 + etc. = 0 => a = b = etc. = 0)
so <sum(av),v>=<a,v>=<0,v> implies that all a_i=0 is what we wanna get to?
@tame summit Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tame summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
,rotate
idk how to get the equation to solve for derivative
use pythagoras
Rate of walk by man, dx/dt = 5s
15/y = 6/(y - x)
upon solvin
3y = 5x
3(dy/dt) = 5(dx/dt)
dy/dt = (5/3)(dx/dt)
dy/dt = (5/3)(5)
dy/dt = 30/3
dy/dt = 10 ft/s
rate
sorry where did u get 15?
ive recently done the similar question
take whats given in ur question
pretty much everything's same
hope this would have helped
Closed by @wooden badge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In order to calculate the Correlation, Standard Deviation, and Covarriance, could someone possibly varify the Answers step by step by calculating each variable correctly?
@lethal shore Has your question been resolved?
@lethal shore Has your question been resolved?
nevermind, i got it : 0

.close
Closed by @lethal shore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I tried to set $\mathbf{a} \cdot \mathbf{b}=4\sqrt{26}$
and then i would get 5x-z=4sqrt26
but then I get stuck so I feel like I messed up somewhere else
za
is there an other way I should approach this
nvm that was super easy woops
.close
Closed by @radiant bone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi where to ask question related to permutation?
you could just ask it here
Find the total number of arrangements of the letters in the word "INDEPENDENCE".
Out of these, how many arrangements are there where the vowels never occur together? please provide sample as outcome only.
@jolly kite Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i prove bernoullis inequality with the binomial theorem
im up to $(1+x)^n = 1 + nx + \sum_{k=2}^n \binom{n}{k} (1)^{n-k} x^k$
syecko
since x > -1 i have -1<x<0 and x>=0
i cant find a way to prove the sum is positive for all x > -1 though
x>-1 so you have x>=0 ?
how's that ?
nono thats not what i meant
i meant or like theres two cases, its negative in the first instance and postiive in the second right
mhm
i need to manipulate the right though
induction seems easy but also why can we use base case x = -1 if x > -1
i mean inuitively its obvious
just didnt seem rigorous
so i wanted to use the binomial theorem
x can take any real value greater than -1, not just naturals
you can't induct on that
yea oops
only on the naturals or integers
why or
wait in induction can you use any base case
so long as it satisfies the condition on n
like can i use n = 100 for instance
obviously 0 and 1 are nicer because theyre simpler
whatever base case you use, you have proved the statement for cases larger than that
if you use base case n=100, you have shown your result to be true for n>=100 and not for 1<n<100
ahh so then i should use n = 0
yea
because if i only show n = 1 then it doesnt show for n = 0 in the induction step
ok thank you
.close
Closed by @orchid walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Oh are you 8 years old yet
.close
Closed by @lost yarrow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey can someone please explain me how to get the answer for the circled one
Idk what I’m missing but that’s not possible
@delicate veldt Has your question been resolved?
So first off since the RHS is non-negative, the only x’s such that is true for the LHS is when |x| <= 2/3.
so let’s separate the equations into cases.
If -2/3 <= x < 0 and lambda x - 2/3 < 0
Then if lambda => 0 we have that -2/3 <= x < 0, if lambda < 0 then we have that x is inbetween 2/(3 lambda) < x < 0.
That is 2 +3x = 2/3 - lambda x
This means we that x = (2/3-2)/(3+lambda) for x’s and lambdas that satisfy the condition above
By careful inspection you’ll notice that there is never such a lambda that we wanted to find, infact by symmetry something almost identical is seen for the other case. So something is either wrong or missing in your question
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
For 3c I got cos^-1(7/(squareroot of 364)) = theta. The answer however is (second screenshot)
i understand the quotient rule but dont understand where the 2x comes from
can u go somewhere else this is my ticket :3
Oh apologies
chain rule
compute the derivative of the denominator, you should also get a 2x bit
the part where you have to compute a derivative that requires it
to me it looks like i could use only quotient rule to get the der
like if i was given only this, what tells me i need more than just quotientrule
to find the derivatevew
what's your question
i don't know what "tell" you'd accept, but it would just come as a consequence of computing v'
hold on i could have explained that better
when looking at the problem, what tells me "oh i need to use quotientrule AND chhainrule"
is that better
😭
again this is really all i got
if the numerator and/or denominator requires the chain rule in its derivative computation, then you know you'll need it at some point(s)
quotient rule: function of x on both sides of a fraction
chain rule: a composition of functions somewhere
what separates a problem that can be sovled using only quotient and a problem that needs quotient+chain
see my previous answer
i read this like 5 times and still dont get it,
when/how would i know whether the numerator or denom "requires" chain rule?
you identify a composition of functions
ie. sin(cos(x)). The inner term is cos, outer is sin, thus you have to use chain rule
in this case (x^2+4)^1/3, the inner term is x^2+4 (clearly demarcated by the brackets), the outer term is ^1/3, thus chain rule
so if either numer/denom is a "composition" of fractions, id need to use the chainrule?
ex: both numer/denom are compositions, id need to chainrule twice, once for numer and once for denom
is that last part correct
yup
@agile lion Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wooooooooo I feel so good about the midterm I have today
Its crazy how good you feel when you study at 3 a.m
you know its wierd because I tried to sleep, but I couldn't so I just did more math
Why am I enjoying this 😭
I might have turned into a nerd
but its ok, because Im feeling good
why did you open a new hepl channel to tell us this..
idk
Is there an actual question
nope
close it then
Then close it
Oh bruh
.close
Closed by @bronze osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
!close

Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ok. thank you for the reply
.close
Closed by @delicate veldt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
1
it's a set of all vectors x, such that x = (a, 0) for some a in Z
do you know what Z is?
not sure no
Z is a set of all integers
ohhh right I forgot
Z = {... -3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3 ...}
so if a is in Z, it means that a is some integer
ok gotcha
btw, i will be writting $(a, 0)$ instead of $[
\begin{bmatrix}
a \
0
\end{bmatrix}
]
$
MæthIsAlwaysRight
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
sure
Okay, so A is a set of all vectors x, s.t. x = (a, 0) for some integer a
that means that e.g. (1, 0) is in A
and (-4, 0) is in A
and (104214124, 0) is in A
and even (0, 0) is in A
I don't exactly know how they want you to draw this, you are probably just supposed to draw that set of points in plane
can you do that?
And do you get what im saying? If not, stop me and ask at any time
Yes, and the set A consists of vectors in form (a, 0) where a is an integer
so (1,0); (-141, 0); (0, 0); etc are all in A
the problem now asks you to draw the set A
probably by sketching that set of points on a plane
Do you think you can do that?
so just sketching any points?
Yes, sketch a sample of the points in A
along the x-axis, and its not exactly a line
woops yeah got that backwards
it contains only the integer ponits
So the next task is identifying whether this is a subspace (presumably of R^2, under standard operations)
do you know what conditions does it have to satisfy in order to be a subspace?
yes, it has something to do with vectors in A
there are 3 conditions
- it must contain the 0 vector, that is (0, 0)
- it must be closed under vector addition, which means that when we add 2 vectors in A, we get another vector in A
- it must be closed under scalar multiplication, which means that when we multiply a vector in A by some scalar, we get another vector in A
these conditions can actually be summarized in one, and that is:
A is closed under linear combinations of vectors in A, that means that any linear combination of vectors in A is also in A
does that look familiar? Or is it completely new to you?
its new but makes sense
hmm, alright. is there any other definition in your book / course?
if so, could you post it here
Ah, okay
yes, condition
(i) is actually closure under vector addition
it means that whenever we take 2 vectors in A and add them, we get another vector in A
condition
(ii) is closure under scalar multiplication
whenever we multiply vector in A by some scalar, we get another vector in A
(And this condition actually implies the 0-vector condition, since it says that 0 * v = 0 must be in A as well)
anyway, let's now verify those conditions for A
that all makes sense to me
is A closed under vector addition?
does condition (i) hold?
when I give you 2 vectors in A, say
(a, 0) and (b, 0), where a and b are integers, what will be their sum?
what will (a, 0) + (b, 0) be?
if its 2,0 and 3,0 it would be 5,0 right?
which is a vector in A
two integers added together gives another integer?
Yes
Also yes
to prove it generally,
(a, 0) + (b, 0) = (a+b, 0) and since a + b is also an integer, the result will be in A
now condition (ii)
if you multiply any vector in A by any scalar, will the result always be in A?
no
correct, can you give an example?
as in 1.1?
scalar is just a real number
This example actually works
yes, which is in A
right
but 1.1 * (1, 0) = (1.1, 0) which is not in A
was that your example?
it wasnt but it ironically works lol
ah i misunderstood it then lol
yes, if you dont use an integer scalar on (1, 0), the result will definitely not be in A
so you can use this or similar as an example
since you will have to explain why A isn't a subspace
which is because it fails to satisfy condition ii), because [insert ur example here]
Can we move to B now?
so how would you draw this one?
what vectors are even in B?
and more importantly, what vectors are not in B?
Yes, that's the only vector not in B
correct
can it even be drawn?
if we use your book's definition, which condition does it not satisfy?
"subspaces give a mathematically precise definition of a flat space through the origin"
You could probably just draw over the whole plane, and draw an empty circle at (0, 0) to show that it's not there
okay, that works lol
it also fails to satisfy condition (ii) here
because e.g. (1, 1) is in B, but 0 * (1, 1) is not in B
right
okay, so now C)
this one looks pretty similar to A, except t is now an y-coordinate and t can also be non-integer
right
do you think it satisfies condition i)?
yes
why? can you prove it?
0,1+1,1=1,2 which makes t a real number still
this is a particular example
also, (1, 1) isnt even in C
its not?
It's not.
C is the set of all vectors x, where x = (0, t) for some real t
is (1, 1) of the form (0, t)?
*which is in C
yes
but what if there were some other vectors in C, for which the condition would fail?
You need to be more general when proving stuff
this only shows a particular example
2*(1, 0) was also in A, but A actually failed to satisfy condition ii)
what is the general form of a vector in C?
how does a general vector in C look like
It looks like a line on the y axis
yes, that's how you would draw it
and the vectors will be of form (0, a) for some real a
so take 2 general vectors in C, then you can write them as (0, a) and (0, b) for some reals a and b
what will (0, a) + (0, b) be?
that's another example
there are infinitely many more
you can't list them out all unfortunately
and if you don't, it wont be a proof
so you will have to work generally here
gotcha
I'll show you how to do the proof for condition i), and you will then try to do a proof for condition ii)
So condition i) tells us, that we need to verify that for all vectors u and v in C, u + v is also in C
so we start by taking some vectors u and v in C
this tells us, that u and v will be of form (0, t) for some real t
so let's say that u = (0, a) and v = (0, b)
then u + v = (0, a) + (0, b) = (0, a + b)
and since a and b are real numbers, a + b must be real number as well
and so (0, a+b) must also be in C
which means that u + v is in C
yes
yes
k is the scalar and u is the vector (0,t)
lets say that u=(0,a) which can be any real number and in this case is 450
(0,450) * K which can be any real number which in this case lets say is 1.5
Don't say the 450 part, you need your proof to be general. a can be any real number, not just 450
ok
do (0, a) * k instead
yes, to be exact, the "some real number" will be aK
exactly
yep
it does go through 0,0
t can be any real number
can you name few vectors that are in D?
(1,430) (1,532.32) (1,23)
so it contains e.g.
(0, 0) + (1, 1)
or
(0, 5) + (1, 1)
or even
(0, 3.14159) + (1, 1)
do the vectors have to be written with the +(1,1)?
or can the 1,1 just be added
for examples
you can just add it
it contains
(1, 1)
(1, 6)
(1, 614)
etc
in general, it contains any (1, t)
does it contain (0, 0) though?
yes, it doesnt
mhm
can you draw it?
what would it look like?
it would be a plane with an empty space at 0,0 going in the positive direction?
not quite
this plane would also contains vectors like (5, 713)
does D contain that?
on x=1 in the y direction