#help-17
1 messages · Page 232 of 1
@lucid palm Has your question been resolved?
@lucid palm Has your question been resolved?
@lucid palm Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @lucid palm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
(5x-50)/8 = 20
5x-50=8*20=160
5x=210
x=210/5=42
Don’t do the work for them
Y
Against rules
@ancient glacier pick a channel and close the other
Oki
Closed by @ancient glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi can someone help me with a practice problem, I keep getting two answers
“Find the area bounded by y=x^3 and y=x^2-2x over (-1,1)
ur working?
Working?
could u show the steps u took to get the two different answers
Ya give me a sec I keep getting 3/2 and 5/2
I basically used the area between curves formula
When I check with my calculator it says 3/2 in decimal form
@crude shell Has your question been resolved?
No
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
who can help me step by step and help me see if. didn't anything wrong
@analog narwhal Has your question been resolved?
no
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with this proof
so far i made the ratios x/y, y/z, and z/x and used componendo dividendo to make them in the correct format
For Example:
but when i tried with the other ratios and then plugged it all back into the question it didn't cancel out for some reason
<@&286206848099549185> ^
@royal cairn Has your question been resolved?
@royal cairn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Because I proved it above as well
@royal cairn Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@untold arrow Has your question been resolved?
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm confused on number 2 on why a result this extreme would be unlikely. Wouldn't it be likely since rejecting the null hypothesis takes up 5% in the critical region?
I am also confused on part c of number one because I'm not exactly sure what a comparison distribution actually does
The cutoff is the boundary at which you go from not rejecting to rejecting. It would have been more precise for the statement to say "a result at least this extreme is..."
Why is it unlikely tho
Because the probability of obtaining a sample at least as extreme is (usually) at most 5%
Something happening 5% of the time is pretty unlikely
Thank you so much for the help
I guess I got confused by the wording
Fair enough
I would also recommend you read the first question again, because both of your hypotheses are wrong
Ok
Oh I see, no equipment
Should just be new exercise
Indeed
Thank you
<@&286206848099549185>
@crimson heath Has your question been resolved?
@crimson heath Has your question been resolved?
Where is the ques?
@crimson heath Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @crimson heath
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@bitter pilot @gentle sleet Not even sure if that answer is correct but uh yeah

you just have the x= there
shouldn't be there
,w x^2+14x-11=0
it is- im asking how to input. Sorry if I didn't specify- I've been coming back to this for the same question of "how 2 input" like 3 or more times now lol
i dont know
you need a comma in answer so you should write x1, x2 instead of x = x1 x = x2 as you wrote there
I have no idea what that means
-7+2sqrt(15), -7-2sqrt(15)
Just saw this- mb missed it
but you were correct
yeay
luckyly i dont need to use some website or digital stuff to input my answer
lol
I hope I understand how to input sometime soon cus this is annoying
It tells you. You just have to read carefully
Idk is it some kind of rule that I'm meant to assume x= is not meant to be inputted? Some of these previous ones also just aren't clear and don't tell you.
it says
enter your answers as a comma separated list
and also the x= on the left there
RIIGHT
ig the first one you did do
@pale rune Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pale rune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
would you say the function y*tan(y)=sqrt(lambda+y^2), where 0<y<sqrt(lamda), has a solution for every lamda>0? what about at natural number multiples of pi/2? Isn't tan undefined in these points, making the statement false ?
well who says that the solution should be y=n*pi/2. only then it would be undefined
given lambda, you want to solve for y, right?
if pi/2<sqrt(lambda) then you probably can intermediate value theorem out a y
yeah I just realzied that mb
i completely misunderstood what it said
no its 2 functions of y
but I understand where I went wrong
@spice perch Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @spice perch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can i do this without l hopitals?
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@ionic marlin don't occupy multiple help channels
alr I'll start my explanation anyways
we'll deal with the denominator first
recall the formula for a^3 - 1 here
we'll let a=cbrt(x)
then we get x-1=(cbrt(x) - 1)(cbrt(x^2) + cbrt(x) +1)
now try to express cbrt(x) - 1
Closed by @ionic marlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do i even find cos(415⁰)
cos (360+55) :d
@shy ermine Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @shy ermine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please explain how to do task C? I have 0 idea
I'm struggling to understand laplace transforms
The request is to prove the equation, and գ) and դ), at least any of them
@sullen pasture Has your question been resolved?
define touch
<@&286206848099549185>
make a new help channel for your question
What do you mean
Are you blind
Look higher what i wrote near my nick
ya
@sullen pasture Has your question been resolved?
Use Laplace transform identities. One that has a derivative and another that multiplies exponential function
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do this with like sum and product
I have no idea what to do
Ok so here you have to split the 3x
Such that adding it you get 3x and multiplying it you get 2x²
Yeah
for an equation ax² + bx + c
Split bx . Let we split it into kx+ jx. It should be in way that kx+ jx = bx and (kx) (jx) = cax²
😿
Ooh
Yeahhh
Ask me about any step you are confused about
Well i guess i dont really understand how too start with it
Like why x^2
Turns into 1
I see
Well I would suggest you to watch a video on yt on middle term splitting and some examples with it
You will get it
What happened
Ohh alr
It cannot be explained verbally well
Well x² didn't turn into 1 technically
If you still have any doubts after that feel free to ask
Do you know how to take factors @warm sage ?
Let her understand the whole method first thunder
Most of her doubts will be solved
Maybe all
No, if she doesn't know how to take factors or what factor is
She won't understand the method
True
Ill have a look at both of em
@warm sage I would suggest read about quadratic equations first before solving the above problem
Alr thank you
And look into some examples as well
I have a bunch of tasks too solve🙏
Then as me and FlexO suggested read some theories and examples, then come back and we will be here
You cannot solve them until you understand what you are given in question
Alright ty, ill watch some youtube
@warm sage Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @warm sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is a question on my study guide for calc, and i know the answer is B but i don't know why 😭
Well, you don't actually have any data, so you kinda have to eyeball it. And you seem to have successfully eyeballed it.
i got the answer out of luck though, what would i be eyeballing for like if i get a different problem siimilar to it?
you can mentally draw a line between (a, f(a)) and (b, f(b))
and see which point's tangent looks closest to the correct slope
a is 0, b is plausible, c is too high, d is negative
where is f(a) and f(b)?
hey everyone i just joined this server
Hi, if you need help please read #❓how-to-get-help
like this?
no
how is it
k sure
lowercase a, b not A, B
ohh okay, i get it now thank you
yw
.close
Closed by @dapper dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I did 20/e-1 * integral lnx/x
u = lnx
du=1/x
xdu=dx
so u/x * xdu
x's cancel
left with u du
so its just 20/e-1 * integral lnx
$\int u du = \frac{u^2}{2} + C = \frac{\ln^2(x)}{2} + C$
ohh
icannotdoanymorecauchy
yea i think i need to work on understanding usub cause i think the problem is done when its not
you get u by itself so you can integrate it
so usub isnt the actual integration. its just manipulating the equation inside
yes
got it
but u're using u sub to integrate in terms of u
and then when u're done
u change back to x
in fact what u're doing aint quite right
icannotdoanymorecauchy
u're integrating f(x) with respect to du
well i did du = 1/xdx
i wanted dx by itself
so x(du)=dx
the u-sub part went correct
but when u substituted u as ln(x) back during integration isnt correct
because the respect u were integrating to was du not dx
i forget, "with respect" means im trying to isolate dx
i started learning usub 2 days ago 💀
its not so bad because if i had time i would spend it on watching videos and reading material that explains it intuitively
but i just gotta figure it out as i go along
thanks for the help
.close
Closed by @dim lodge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain this to me please why there are zeros of two rows up and down are added to the matrix X
<@&286206848099549185>
It doesn't effect I think
Cause it will still give the same matrix
That will come after multiply
@feral drift Has your question been resolved?
yes but I mean how i come to the last matrix at the end of H, the answer is 4*2 matrix
U did X matrix * W matrix=Y matrix * H matrix?
H matrix is 4 * 2 matrix
Basic rule of out put of multiplication of two matrix
Did u solve this ques right?
Like if a matrix is given
2*3 why u making it
6*3
It can be solved by just letting H matrix as
this is convolution * this bold star means convolution not matrix multiply
@feral drift Has your question been resolved?
@open sundial
@feral drift Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im trying to figure out the general rule to follow when solving this problem here,
and so far,
a(-1) , find it in the
1st row of the table.
for m(4) , use the graph.
oh mb lol
old, i changed to 4,
well actually,
when i did that i must have forgot to get rid of the -
ok then :) thanks.
.close
Closed by @tame river
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone explain where the 5.0026 came from or help me figure out how to do this definite integral
I feel like I'm losing my mind because I swear no matter what I do I can't get 5.0026
also 20pi( is outside the integral but chatgpt doesn't show it)
"is evaluated numerically" means they used some approximation method. They did not solve the integral, and it may be impossible to solve
,w integral of x^4 sqrt(1600x^6 + 1) dx between 0 and 1
what does that mean and how do I solve it because my professor didn't teach this 💀
"is evaluated numerically" means they used some approximation method. They did not solve the integral, and it may be impossible to solve
(It very likely is impossible to solve)
If that is a ChatGPT response, what was to original question exactly? Just in case something went wrong along the way that made this harder to compute than it should be.
,w 20pi * 5.0026
As always, ignore ChatGPT
I think that might just be a ChatGPT quirk unfortunately. Kaynex's wolfram output says it's 5.0059
You want some kind of software to numerically compute integrals. Wolfram Alpha can do it
so I substitute 1 from the upper bound into the equation but I still cannot get 5.0059
can i do it on a graphing calulator or no?
Probably some, yeah
Yes, I do it all the time.
ok I'm just going to assume these problems won't be on an exam because how are we supposed to solve if we can only use wolfram alpha 💀
Anyways, thanks for the help @regal bane @gaunt sparrow 👍
.close
Closed by @pale python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this strange problem
@sterile wyvern Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sterile wyvern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey guys, I need some help on my calc one homework
I've been stuck on this problem for the past hour, and would like some pointing in the right direction. Thanks!
that's the definition of the derivative right?
huh
would it be 1/4
ye
how would you evaluate it for the left side?
@fossil crown keep in mind a limit can still exist with a hole
the limit doesnt exist for this q cuz the lims from two sides differ
so just saying f(x) discontinuous at x_0 is not good enough to say the lim doesnt exist there
could i say that the derivative doesn't exist at that point because of the discontinuity?
ya thatd be correct
discontinuity means derivative dne there
but discontinuity doesn't mean limit dne there
Closed by @fossil crown
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
n
i feel like sig figs change rules every day
Like i am told to not round until final answer
and not round to sf early
but why are they doing it
like
if i waited till the end
i get a differenta nswer
How different?
uh
1 sec
so
for 0.9893(12.0000)
i get 118716
im keeping in mind the sfs till the end
then when i do
0.0107 times 13.0034
i got 0.13913638
Where is the decimal?
0.9893(12.0000) does not equal 118716
11.8716
oops
and then i got
0.13913638
oh
ok
that makes the difference
i need some sleep
thnx
.close
Closed by @cinder oyster
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
wioahh
wait
round to nearest 3 sf
how would it be 12.01
oh
wait
ok i have scenario question but i closed this channel i ask it later
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
consider the possibilities if:
3 dimes are counted, or 2 dimes are counted, or 1 dime is counted, or 0 dimes are counted
yea i thought of the possibilities to be
3 dimes
2 dimes 2 nickels
2 dimes 1 nickel 5 pennies
1 dime 4 nickels
1 dime 3 nickels 5 pennies
i think thats all the ways they add up to 30
but im not sure how to put it all together
as a probability
what you could do is calculate the total number of possibilities
and then the total number of possibilities that add up to 30
and then divide the latter by the former
im kinda stuck here
are the total possibilities just 2^12
4096
and then theres 5 distinct ways of getting exactly 30 cents facing up
the total possibilities I would think would be 12!
given that you have 12x11x10x...x1 different ways to select a coin
then you could calculate the number of ways to make each of the possibilities
oh nvm the number that lands heads up
you're right
it would be 2^12
my bad
as for the number of distinct ways you could calculate the probability of each
for example 3 dimes you know would be 3x2x1 total ways to be made
wait what
think about it
if we are discussing the probability of 2^12
you will be discussing the total number of permutations
so we need to consider the total number of permutations for each case that will make 30 cents
to pick up 3 dimes
you have 3 * 2 * 1 arrangements
but wouldnt it be like
for the case that its 3 dimes landing on heads
those 3 have to be facing heads up
I keep forgetting that it's heads or tails
everything else has to be tails
and the same for the rest
only the specific ones have to be heads
the rest have to be tails
yeah in that case you have to get all 3 heads and the rest tails
Oh wait
that's only one possibility
yeah for 2 dimes 2 nickels you would have 3C2 * 4C2 possibilities
because you have 3 dimes and 2 that need to be heads
and 4 nickels and 2 that need to be heads
yeah
ye
I believe so
yea that makes sense
its been a while since ive done probability
but i appreciat the help
have a good one
.close
Closed by @dusky willow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to solve lim->0 sinx/x?
as a reminder since its been a month or so
lhopital's? :D
Without lohoptial
use the taylor series expansion.
,wolf taylor sin(x)
or squeeze yes.
well i know how to do that but my professor hasnt taught that yet so it might seem dishonest
there are two classic ways
i prefer taylor when possible
oh yeah i forget about squeeze
- perimeter of n-polygon
- similar triangles inside and outside unit circle
here it's plain convenient
-1<sinx<1 but where do you go from there after multiplying by 1/x
i havent learnt that yet altogether
i think it comes soon after exponentials in my textbook
i dont think that's appropriate here
right
how do you mean?
interesting
Well that's not at all scary lol
i didnt know that was something to look out for now im curious about that lol
what are the general exceptions for squeeze theorem?
am i super confused lol
fucking pngs
@daring forum Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @daring forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the curves that satisfy each of the following geometric conditions:
(g) The polar angle θ equals the angle ψ from the polar radius to the
tangent.
(h) The angle ψ from the polar radius to the tangent is constant.
got 2 questions here
in part (g) θ = 0 is also a solution, i dont get why
im not that familiar with polar coordinates so it would be helpful if someone helped explain that as well, like i get it but as you see, dont understand why θ = 0 is a solution
and in part (h)
i saw a solution online
they said this essentially means that
either θ = k
or tan θ = k
therefore
(1/r)(dr/dθ) = k
dont get this also
@noble mortar Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@noble mortar Has your question been resolved?
@noble mortar Has your question been resolved?
@noble mortar Has your question been resolved?
@noble mortar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would I do part a lol
,calc (-5^2+5)/(5+1)
Result:
-3.3333333333333
Wot
maybe they meant +n^2?
or -(n^2+n)
yea
,calc -(5^2+5)/(5+1)
Result:
-5
,w Table[ -(k^2+k)/(k+1), {k,0,6}]

k^2 + k = k(k+1)
thats the entire q
yea it’s a typo then
they either meant -(n^2 + n) or just n^2 + n
jan Niku
$\mqty( -n^2+n \\ 3 )$ or whatever
ty
alr so now how would I do part a
also what exactly does n represent here?
naturals?
or real numbers
is this like a vectorial sequence
like a sequence of vectors instead of scalars
never seen this, interesting xD
yeah, natural numbers ig
like with usual sequences
Closed by @green gulch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
for b, since this is a vectorial sequence
the sequence is convergent if the modulus of the sequence is finite
like if lim n -> oo | Vn | != oo
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yes
and is the radius of the circle one?
hi
if so, then i can just use Y-Y1 = m (X-X1) from
(0,1) and (-1,1)
(0,1) and (1,-1)
is it correct?
oh
sorry i just thought it's gonna be like this
xD
then where is the intersection point on the circle?
the tangent lines that'd pass through the indicated points would be vertical lines
(which wouldn't pass through (0,1)
start with getting a general equation of a line that passes through
(0,1)
how to find a line that passes through 0,1 without knowing the intersection point or slope (gradient)?
or should we find the slope first?
(0,1)
y-1 = m (x)
y = mx+1
just for illustration, I will ignore the gradient values
after i subtitute the y=mx+1 to x^2+(y+1)^2=1
= x^2 (1+m^2)+2mx=0
youre in the right direction to solving this
but no, you would find another quadratic
didn't expand correctly
i just take the discriminant = 0
and i find m = +- 2
yee
yeah, thats what you would do exactly
force it to be 0
yes, thats the quadratic i found, noice
m² = 3
so it should be
y1 = 3x+1
y2 = -3x+1
root of 3 ?
you figured it out by yourself though 😛
subbing the line into the circle, then putting d=0
idk I suddenly remembered my 2nd grade high school lessons
about circle
mhm yeah
its true like in general
not only circles
if you want 2 things to intersect
sub one into another
the solutions to the resultant equation will automatically be the potential intersection points
at first, i was so confuse of this because i don't have one of the two variables haha
yeah xD
Closed by @static stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
When I try to split tan^4 into two tan^2, I still have an extra tan after applying my du
my u is sec(6x) and my du is 6sectan(6x)
thephalluspulverizer
exactly what it says
anyways
Closed by @honest orbit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
sorry i was never any good at math
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
They want it written in this format this is another answer
But how did I get the one I did wrong?
@lucid meteor
@flat whale
!noping
Please do not ping individual helpers unprompted.
😂😂
that one you solved it wrong
you forgot to sqrt the 25
also from using the quadratic formula it should be -3/5
I'm not sure where you did the mistake though
Feel free to look at the steps
w+3/5 = ±√14/5
w = -3/5±√14/5
So this is what ur saying
ah, ic
-3/5 bro
the negative one
(w+⅗) =±√14/5
The 3/5 is positive
Subtract both side ⅗
How’s it negative
Is that squared tho

You don't know how to find the roots of quadratic equation?
Using formula?
Of discriminant
Complete the square is one method
I use this method
There is another with formula
Okk
Yes
Every quadratic equation can be solved
With that
Which do you reccomend that one or the -b+- sqrt 4(a)(c) over 2a
This is one liner , you just put values of a,b,c and find x
Complete square is a lengthy process
So which one is easier and better
But whichever feels good for you
Easier and faster
They both do but what’s easier and more simple
Which one
Bro see which message I have replied to
So the -b+- sqrt of 4 one
-b± one is faster @safe jewel
I should go with
Dumb professor doesn’t use that one
Well completing square helps your brain to get sharp

quadratic formula makes your brain even sharper

Its easy way, just put a ,b,c no extra brain needed
Completing square you need to think what terms to add to make it complete square
Sometimes fractions too
think about how much you could learn in the time saved not doing that

Completing the square is a necessary skill for your integration paraphernalia
So. I shouldn’t use the easier one
Once you feel confident about using completing square method, then use the easier one to save time
Bet that up little homie
@safe jewel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is it possible to determine the Ratio R/Ρ?
Is R the radius of black circle?
Yes
@onyx mirage Has your question been resolved?
Ok I give up for the night ping me if anyone gets it though it's interesting 😔
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont understand at all
commplete the square in the denominator
partial fraction decomposition seems promising
Aren't y'all overcomplicating =_=
Can't you just factor out x, separate into two fracs, then they're just ln
i ddid that but the answer pulls out a 1/4x and a 1/4(x+4) and idk where the extra 4s came from
What the
how would you separate into two fracs
that's what you would get from perfoming the partial fraction decomp
Ignore me lmao
i got it
thx
idk why uit didnt occur to me to do that
@lavish slate Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lavish slate
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi. I'm stuck on the following problem: "$x(t)=(t^2 - t) * sin(2 * t)$, $y(t)=t$, $t \in [-\frac{\pi}{2}, \frac{\pi}{2}]$. Find the distance between x and y in $C[a, b]$ and $C^{(1)}[a, b]$ spaces". \
For $C[a, b]$ the distance is $\rho(x, y) = max_{a \le t \le b}|x(t) - y(t)|$ \
For $C^{(k)}[a, b]$ the distance is $\rho(x, y) = \sum_{i=0}^k (max_{a \le t \le b}|x^{(i)}(t) - y^{(i)}(t)|)$ \
For the first problem, I declared a function $f(t) = x(t) - y(t)$ and tried to find its local extremums by finding the roots of its derivative. \
$f^{(1)}(t) = 2 * t^2 * cos(2 * t) + 2 * t * (sin(2 * t) - cos(2 * t)) - sin(2 * t) - 1$ \
I tried solving it as a quadratic equation, but $t = \frac{2 * cos(2 * t) - 2 * sin(2 * t) \pm \sqrt{4 + 8 * cos(2 * t)}}{4 * cos(2 * t)}$ didn't help much. \
Wolfram Alpha returns some weird approximations as the answers and not fractions with pi or something similar: $x \approx -1.006$ and $x \approx -0.2023$. \
I've also tried asking latest GPTs, but they just calculate the distance in 0 and $\pm \frac{\pi}{{2, 3, 4, 6}}$ and do some strange assumptions that those are extremums or something like this. \
It is worth noting that I've plotted these functions on Desmos: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/lphyvkxufs and from the plots it can be seen that the maximums of $|f(t)|$ are achieved in $t = -\frac{\pi}{2}$ and $t = \frac{\pi}{2}$ and that the maximum of $|f(t)| + |\frac{d}{dt}(f(t))|$ is achieved in $-\frac{\pi}{2}$, so it seems like I don't need the exact roots of derivatives, but I don't understand, how should I prove that the solutions are achieved in the bounds of t and not somewhere in between?
Gragonite
@tawny marten Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> ?
@tawny marten Has your question been resolved?
@tawny marten Has your question been resolved?
@tawny marten Has your question been resolved?
Why are you adding the two here
|f(t)| + |f'(t)|
to infer the max occurs at t=-pi/2?
It's the distance in $C^{(1)}[a, b]$
Gragonite
it's not according to your definition
Ah, you are right, I've made a mistake there. However, max(|f'(t)|) is also achieved in -pi/2: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/kbk2lr2ydh, - so this mistake doesn't change anything
@tawny marten Has your question been resolved?
@tawny marten Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tawny marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
trying to look for a pattern here
quadratic ax^2+bx+c: Σα = -b/a, Σαβ = c/a
cubic ax^3+bx^2+cx+d: Σα = -b/a Σαβ = c/a Σαβγ = -d/a
can i extend this and alternate between positive and negative
-b/a c/a -d/a e/a -f/a g/a and s on
sorry if im not making myself clear
yes of course!
oh my god thank you
@split wind this applies even if im not just looking for the products of roots?
if im looking for something like this
i can still apply my logic above?
yep
Closed by @obsidian ore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have that $A_4 = {\frac{n-1}{n+1} : n \in \mathbb{Z}_{\ge 0} }$
Curry
I want to prove that the least upper bound of this set is 1 in the rationals
What I've done is
Suppose there exists alpha in Q such that alpha is an upper bound and that alpha is less than 1
I want to find some n such that (n-1)/(n+1) > alpha
so I did some rearranging and got that (1+alpha)/(1 - alpha) < n
I know n needs to be a part of Z greater than or equal to 0
But I'm not sure how to find an n here
Is there a better bound I can use to find n?
The greatest upper bound would be larger than 1, since 2, 3 etc are also upper bounds. What you could prove is that the least upper bound is 1
oh sorry that's my typo
yeah that's what I'm trying to prove
Apologies I have edited the message now
But this method is for attempting to prove that 1 is the least upper bound in A_4
Were you given this task from a teacher or are you trying to solve it on your own?
Right
I wanted to get some guidance on where I could go from here
As I'm trying to find some n to disprove my negation
If I can find an $n \in \mathbb{Z}_{\ge 0}$ such that \ $n > \frac{\alpha + 1}{\alpha - 1}$
Curry
ur basically done here
alpha+1/alpha-1 is just some number
and so since the naturals are unbounded
you can find some n large enough (where it's larger than that fraction)
ohh
so the archimedian property
just calling this value k I can say k is apart of Q which is a subset of R
So by the archimedian property there exists some n in Z_+ such that It is greater than k
That makes sense thank you
nw!
.close
Closed by @pliant oyster
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
"Use the error formula to give an estimation of the error of your approximation"
I have computed the 4rth degree of the taylor polynomial, but what am i supposed to do next?
Clearly u have to apply an error formula u were given, as said in the question
Ye i understand that, but that is like computing the fourth degree polynomial and then put in 0,1?
as our x?
x would be 0.1 your a would be e, so you could solve for e then
that would give you a formula for your error
Actually you are right, because your a should be 0.1
I dont know how to rotate, but that is super annoying to read
We need to have our a as (e) so that the ln(a) becomes ln(e) which is 0
Can you solve it for e, when you put x=0.1?
1**
I cant really read what you have.
I will get. ua better picture
The formula (7.6.2)
And my approximation of the third degree with x=0.1 and a=e is 1.1253333…
Sorry its not clear to my from the question why you used 7.6.2
It asks for taylor series, then the error
Error formula
It ask about the Taylor polynomial of the third degree and then an approximation at x=0.1 and a=e
Then “ Use the error formula to give an estimation of the error of your approximation”
I have my approximation
Which is already calculated from the “first question”
@soft lodge Has your question been resolved?
@soft lodge Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @soft lodge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi guys, i’d like to confirm something.
when we’re given the equation of a curve that intersects a line, we can find the point of intersection by substitution right?
so i’m going to make x as the subject for the line, and substitute it to the x of the curve to find y. then substitute the answer to the y of the line.
it’s correct right?
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
yes
okay i found this hard question and i suddenly forgot everything about intersection of graphs
1.) A curve has equation y = 2xy + 5 and a line has equation 2x + 5y = 1.
The curve and the line intersect at the points A and B. Find the coordinates of the midpoint
of the line AB.
pls help guys, why can't i do substitution here
You can, your way is fine 
okay i’m going to do it again
(remember to make sure that the coordinates of the points you find are in the right order, and that you want the midpoint of the line segment between A and B in the end
)
Awww
let us know if you get stuck again, I'm sure you'll be fine with it though 
thank you so much!!
Closed by @viscid bridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i sketch z^2=(z*)^2
i let z=x+iy
and z*=x-iy
subbed it in
squared both sides
simplifed and got to y=2ix
ive still got an i in my cartesian equation so yh idk
just look at their arguments
idk to simplify it ig
i said y=0 was a solution
so y^2=2ixy?
idk how to visualise that tho
y^2-2ixy=0
y^2 is real
-2ixy is imaginary
0
ohh alright
so to draw that on an argand diagram😭
would it just be
the re(z) axis
theres 2 lines though
the imaginary line too
just look at the arguments
magnitude is the same trivially
for z=z* its the real line
but when its squared we have more solutions, being the imaginary line
really you would probably use quadratic equation and idk
this simplification isn't right
or there is a mistake i didnt break it down
I assume that you've done (-iy)^2 = +y^2
which isn't right
yea, I've triple checked myself because of that lol
did no one use arg :(
i was looking the algebraic way but it felt overly complicated
yeah that makes sense
