#help-17
1 messages · Page 179 of 1
Yeah, yeah my bad
Okay, now plugging in <a1, b1> ≠ <a2, b2> into h. How do I show that h(<a1, b1>) ≠ h(<a2, b2>). It seems to be pretty basic algebra...
Notice that a_i goes to powers of 2 which is always even while the other part is always odd
I figured it out. Thanks!
.close
Closed by @west cape
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Logarithm help:
Because you would get 10^1.92 / m^0.05 which is not the multiplied format given
Oh I seeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Thanks alot I get it now
I forgot about that law
Thanks again, I guess i'll close this now.
.close
Closed by @vale vessel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
On the less triangular piece of paper i am unsure on how to find the perimeters in order to solve part b
I have solved part a as 19.2cm^2 i think
Not sure if its correct
How did you get this?
It says the height is 21 cm tho
Huh why 21
Oh crap yeah
Ah my bad i thought the diagram wouldve been like accurate
Just didnt read properly
.close
Closed by @verbal shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So, this is a problem I was assigned, a while ago, My professor, gave very limited feedback, and said that I was wrong, but didnt really explain much futher, could anyone give me insight on what I could have improved on?
I would start by looking at the first few terms of a_k , what you have written is incorrect
trying to understand where went wrong, sorry not ignoring just looking over my work
As for the proof, it looks like you have the right ideas, not sure why your prof Said it's wrong unless he's nitpicking over something
I think my professor, invalidates a proof if even the beginning is incorrect, as in his words it has no base
a1=1x6=6, a2=26=12, a3=312=36, a4= 4*36=144?
$a_1=1*6=6$
grouchy
.close
Closed by @rugged idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
pick the 3 easiest tasks for me
@tulip parcel Has your question been resolved?
4,5,6
hmm dunno everything on there looks kinda complicated
@tulip parcel Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tulip parcel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Can someone please check my solution for this question. I need to prove by definition (epsilon-delta definition) the limit at the top.
Sorry for hand writing :>
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there anything notably wrong with this?
I have:
1 gram of NaOH dissolved in 100 cm3 of distilled H2O.
Initial and Final Temperatures
Known Values
I can provide more information if needed
First I think this is a maths discord server lol
But I think I can check whats going on
Is this gibbs
Yeah, I asked in #discussion and they said to post it
thats alr
and it was like ages ago
I just feel like I am doing something wrong
whats Q?
c is like specific heat capacity
okok
4.18 yeah
looks right tho
and what im doing is dissolving naoh in water
i just worry theres like a unit mismatch
at this point its nearing 40 hours no sleep i'll just hope its right and speak confidently
you might need to multiply
,calc 1004.183.2
Result:
1337.6
100g ⋅ 4.18 J/g∘C ⋅ 3.2 K = 1337.6 J
yea it seems like u messed up with the unit
oo where
it's in kelvin
but it's delta t so either way its interchangable
Ti = 19.2 + 273.15 = 292.35 K
Tf = 22.4 + 273.15 = 295.55 K
the 19.2 and 22.4 are in celcius
295.55 - 292.35 = 3.2 K
no i mean like heat capacity is given in J/g C or am i just missing something
uhhhh
well
"The unit for T in the equation ΔG = ΔH - T ⋅ ΔS is kelvin (K)."
however you could be onto something
i wish i could help in a better way
that's alr!
.close
Closed by @robust summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
nice
Yahat
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I think the first one is yes but my teach just didn’t actually teach us this today so idk how to determine for b or c…
thanks but i dont know how to determine for b or c
(c) is also contradiction. Can you think of why?
no i literally just said that
In simple terms, a limit exists when their side limits exist and their side limits converge to the same number.
.close
Closed by @vital wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how ?
hayley table
huh
they don't have a common denominator tho
one is e^x-1 and the other is (e^x-1)^2
remember how when you were adding fractions of numbers you'd multiply one of them by like 5/5 to get a common denominator?
so I multiply the fraction on the left by e^x-1 ?
Joeller
great, now combine the fractions together
$\frac{e^x-e^x\cdot(e^x+1)}{(e^x-1)^2}$
Joeller
you dropped a piece
Joeller
great, now simplify the numerator
wait
if you want, you can stop writing the denominator at this point, to make it easier
$\frac{(e^{2x}-e^x)-(e^{2x}-e^x)}{(e^x-1)^2}$
Joeller
nah its fine
wait
nvm that
smth missing
$\frac{(e^{2x}-e^x)-(-e^{2x}-e^x)}{(e^x-1)^2}$
Joeller
Joeller
$\frac{e^x+e^x}{(e^x-1)^2}$
oh wait nvm
okay
so -e^x will go with e^x
and we're left with e^2x+e^2x which is 2e^2x
$\frac{2e^{2x}}{(e^x-1)^2}$
Joeller
hmm that doesn't seem to be what we wanted. check through your work
this is right
nope
are u sure
yes
I distributed the e^x
signs
$\frac{e^{2x}-e^x-e^{2x}+e^x}{(e^x-1)^2}$
Joeller
let's just write the numerators
ight
$e^x(e^x-1) - e^x(e^x+1)$
hayley table
yes
$e^{2x}-e^x-e^{2x}-e^x$
Joeller
so now $e^{2x}-e^{2x}$ is 0 and we're left with $-e^x-e^x$ which is $-2e^x$
are you... using o for 0?
Joeller
mistype 
mmk
yeah
anyway this seems to match now
$\frac{-2e^{x}}{(e^x-1)^2}$
Joeller
Closed by @quasi hull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You wish to spray paint 25 spherical balloons for a party. Each balloon has a 20cm diameter. How many complete cans of spray paint must be used if one can covers 251.3 sq. cm?
! status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
2
so
Where did you get stuck?
Probably faster
So far so good
I’m trying to find the amount of spray cans used now from 31,415.9265 cm^2 of coverage
Is it the complete cans part that confuses you?
Yea, I just need to know what the next steps are. Do I divide that big number per amount of coverage for one can? (251.3 cm^2)
You think?
10 million dollars
me too
So what are the next steps then?
which would make it even worse if you put $10m on it
Lmao
divide it
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Unexpected operator , (char 3)
,calc 31415.9265/251.3
Result:
125.01363509749
Okay, so that means that over one hundred cans were used then?
well
I’ll just enter that as my answer
I’ll trust the process lol
Thank you for confirming
yw
@worn stone Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what this mean
adding them /
what do you mean by that
sounds like youre thinking of resultant vectors from multiple vectors
yeah thats what i thinking
thats not what you need to do here
you get the magnitude squared of a vector by dot producting it with itself
im sorry i dont nkow what dot product means ?
ie the square root of the sum of the square of each component
eg the magnitude of (a b c) is sqrt(a^2+b^2+c^2)
the dot product of two vectors (a b c) and (x y z) is ax+by+cz, a scalar
you can extend that to as many dimensions as you please
oh ok
so
25, 100, 100 ?
sqrt(25+100+100) yeah
so sqrt 225
yeah
its an extension of the pythagorean theorem
can you explain this more ? im still not sure what a dot product is or what its useful for
one main use is to find the angle between two vectors, you can use this to extend to planes and whatnot
the dot product of a and b is the sum of the products of matching components but its also |a||b|cos(x) where x is the angle between them
it has the quirk that if theyre perpendicular ie x=pi/2 then the dot product is 0, which is a useful check when defining planes
since you need normal vectors
im stupid
what are matching components
hm like in (a b c) and (x y z) x and a are the first entries
they match
so do b and y
c and z
etc
Closed by @livid helm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is the converse of the statement
And are you saying the answer to part (a) is supposed to be true?
<@&268886789983436800>
Ask your teacher to explain the answer then
The current time for nutgun. is 09:43 AM (AWST) on Tue, 14/05/2024.
,time
You haven't set your timezone! Set it using the interactive timezone picker with ,ti --set.
You're asking why it's true?
ok imma stiop texting since this is for tutroing
@finite hatch Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @regal parrot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone help me see where I messed up here? Am I misunderstanding?
here's my work so far:
I would actually rather do calc 2 than this, so many places to mess up arithmetic
Are you trying to do RREF?
Firstly, the final step is wrong
R1 would be in R3
R3 would be in R2
R2 would be in R1
Usually we would do it such that we have 1,0,0 on the first column, and then move on to the second one
I think rref is next class period, this is literally just solving the linear system haha
Thank you!
Yeah the prof said next class would be discussing how to do it more algorithmically
Well there is not much algorithm
lol
Do more practice
The complex RREF is harder lol
The one with complex numbers
That's both scary and fascinating haha
I fear arithmetic may be my downfall in advanced math
.close
Closed by @waxen shell
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Didn’t even go over this in class
@edgy peak Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@edgy peak Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @edgy peak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would I solve this?
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
yes
nope
ok
that's just great
The first-derivative test examines a function's monotonic properties (where the function is increasing or decreasing), focusing on a particular point in its domain. If the function "switches" from increasing to decreasing at the point, then the function will achieve a highest value at that point. Similarly, if the function "switches" from decreasing to increasing at the point, then it will achieve a least value at that point. If the function fails to "switch" and remains increasing or remains decreasing, then no highest or least value is achieved.
is from wikipedia
ok
So using this how would I solve?
.close
Closed by @ivory sonnet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
?
! Status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
I need help
First this is more like a chemistry question
Is there a chemistry chat here?
This is a maths server
Check #old-network
Ok
@shadow berry Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can every vector space be turned into an inner product space? In particular the K-vector fields where K is has a finite characteristic, meaning there isn’t really an ordering on K
Somehow ℂ-vector spaces work but it seems to use the fact that it contains ℝ
A vector field over some other field like ℤ5 doesn’t seem to contain ℝ
@rugged orchid Has your question been resolved?
@rugged orchid Has your question been resolved?
i mean half of the conditions stop making sense
Well that’s why I’m asking
When I google this it seems to say every vector space can be turned into an inner product space but a lot of these answers considers only ℝ or ℂ vector spaces
you need to significantly modify the definition of an inner product
So then no?
well like always in maths the answer will probably become yes after you change what the question is 
but like say you have some random K-vector space where K is a subfield of C
call it V
just randomly giving V an inner product seems kinda rude surely
what if V comes with a topology
like C^\infty(\R) functions come with a topology
So the fact that we want said inner product to work nicely with other structures like norms, topology, make it so even if you could define an inner product on a vector space over unordered fields it just won’t be useful
there are plenty of unordered subfields of C 
but like the vector spaces where you care about having an inner product probably already have some kind of natural topology
randomly giving an inner product to a vector space doesnt seem like itll give you a topology that you'd want to work with
Are these just field extensions of algebraic numbers
field extensions of Q even
by the usual definition i wouldnt think so
Since I guess these “unordered” sub fields of ℂ still has some concept of the real line and positivity
well you have the involution right
complex conjugation
and under that involution there is a fixed field
which will be some subfield of R
and thatll be ordered
Well if you’re a sub field of C you’ll inherit that involution I suppose
you can probably mimic the construction
Let $K$ be a field with involution $\sigma : K \to K$ such that the fixed field
[ K^\sigma = \set {, x \in K \where \sigma(x) = x ,} ]
is ordered. Then you can define a sesquilinear form $\inner{}{} : V \by V \to K$ by
\begin{enumerate}
\ii $\inner xx \in K^{\sigma}_{\ge 0}$ and $\inner xx = 0$ iff $x = 0$.
\ii $\inner {ax + by} z = a\inner xz + b \inner yz$.
\ii $\inner xy = \sigma(\inner yx)$.
\end{enumerate}
or something like that
Hmmm
So if you pretty much need to require some sort of ordering and an involution to make an inner product space from any vector space
@rugged orchid Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rugged orchid
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello
I need help
This question please
If you know the answer I’ll gift you 200 vbucks emote
200 VBUX??
@idle tartan Has your question been resolved?
Yes
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
why can you not say that the set of natural numbers is twice the size of the set of even numbers? Can you not do a Cantour mapping and say something like for every even number there are two natural numbers?
No
The function f: N → 2N, given by f(n)=2n is a bijection
For every even number there are two natural numbers is okay but that's not an argument.
In fact for every natural numbers there are also two even numbers
1 → 2 and 4
2 → 6 and 8
3 → 10 and 12
...
That does not work for what you are asserting (|N|>|2N|) which is false
hmmm
Is there no use in calculating the density?
On every interval of 1000, e.g. [0,1000]. There are 500 even numbers and 1000 natural numbers and then do a proof by induction?
No
There's bijection
That means you can ennumerate the even numbers with natural numbers
That is enough to prove that there is the same quantity of even numbers than that of natural numbers
You have the first even, the second even, the third even... So you can have a list of all even numbers indexed by natural numbers
1 ←→ 2
2 ←→ 4
3 ←→ 6
4 ←→ 8
...
n ←→ 2n
And you can go from one set to the other
That's why the cardinal or N is equal to the cardinal of 2N
to do Cantor diagonalization, you need to show that no matter how you number them you'll always miss one
(I like 0 being natural btw, don't bully me haha)
this is a useful thing to do for some applications. but cardinality is not one of them.
hmm, alright, because I am actually wondering about a physics question, namely how we can calculate the amount of stars of type A compared to the amount of stars of type B on the assumption that the universe is infinitely sized and homogenous and isotropic.
would calculating the density be useful then?
without knowing much about physics, density seems like the much better thing to compute here compared to cardinality
@minor folio Has your question been resolved?
@minor folio Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @minor folio
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i pull out a constant while differentiating?
in regards to this question specifically i can do differentiation where its a square root or a number but i have no clue how to do this
i tried to do -2x^-1 and go from there but thats wrong and do 2x^2-x^-3 but that doesnt make sense either and i dont know how to get rid of the constant
i also tride doing 6x^-2 and working from there but got a wrong answer too because i was trying to work off of this example
3a is 3/2 * (derivative of 1/x^2)
You can pull constants out of the derivative; if you'd like to know why let me know
Right, so you know that a derivative is a slope, (change in y)/(change in x) right?
Yeah, so if f(x) is (change in y)/(change in x)
Then k * f(x) has slope (k * change in y)/(change in x)
so the 3 on top is also a derivative?
no, and I don't really know what you mean by that
Oh k is just a constant
For question 3a this would be 3/2
so 3 is K
Nope, I never said that
oh
you might be better off proving that $\dv{x}(c\cdot f(x)) = c\cdot\dv{x}(f(x))$ using the definition of a derivative (the one with limits)
hayley table
Like if we have f(x) = 1/x^2, then (change in y)/(change in x) would be approximately f'(x) = -2x^(-3)
where the changes in x and y are really, really small
So (change in y)/(change in x) is a ratio
yeah
Btw Zaya do you know the definition of the derivative?
$\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(x + h) - f(x)}{h} = f'(x)$?
gradient of individual point
south
this definition
f'x is drivative
ive never seen this ever
Okay thanks for letting me know
it all comes down to (change in y)/(change in x) actually
a quick YouTube search didn't give any results with this image, but I'm sure there are videos on this online
So change in y = f(x + dx) - y = f(x + dx) - f(x)
y = f(x) is the definition of a function
And here we're using dx instead of h, to mean dx = a tiny change in x
Yes exactly
The slope dy/dx is a ratio between dy and dx
Which mean (small change in y) and (small change in x)
No, d/dx is never on its own
oh
When we have d/dx, we always have d/dx (y)
or d/dx (f(x))
d/dx (y) is the same thing as dy/dx
d/dx actually doesn't mean anything on its own, it's just an operator saying: take the derivative of this function
No, that's not right
is 2 in 2x^2 the small change in x?
The correct statement is d/dx (3/2 * 1/x^2) = 3/2 * d/dx (1/x^2)
No
Let me give you a simpler example
Say we have the line y = 2x
The slope is obviously 2
Yeah
We could have x = 1 and y =2
But we could also have x = 3 and y = 6
Or x = 11 and y = 22
And so on
Yeah
So just because we know dy/dx = 1/x^2 for example
Doesn't mean we know dy and dx individually
All we know is that the ratio is 1/x^2
Well, the ratio isn't a number cause it depends on what x we have
That's an additional complication
so dy/dx is 2 in 2x
Yes
This means the slope of the function y = 2x is always 2
No matter which x-value you have
It's 2 everywhere
but in other functions the slope isnt always 2 so thats why you dont know dy & dx individually?
Yes, so calculus is when you have the idea about the slope not being a constant
The slope depends on the point you have
Which is the same as the slope varying based on the x-coordinate
Ok
Well, that's not the reason why you don't know dy and dx individually though
so that is what it means when its said to find derivative in respect to the f(x)
to find the slopes variation in respect to the x coordinate
Even in the straight line example
We could let dx = 1 and dy = 2
Or dx = 4 and dy = 8
Exactly!
So that once we are given the x-coordinate of the point
i wish teachers told me this before throwing this stuff at me 🤦♂️
We can just substitute x in and get the gradient at that point
So we get a number eventually don't worry
that's sad
yeah im far behind the rest of the class rn because i had a surgery and am trying to catch up but i often need to actually understand whats happening to do the math instead of just doing it
Exactly and that's the best way to learn maths
you actually enjoy it then asw lol
Cause the formulas aren't actually that important, like they're online if you need to do your homework
yeah I'm a maths major in fact
But if you don't know how to apply your knowledge that means you're going to have a hard time
Well many people I know tutor
I personally am not a tutor but it's pretty common if you can explain well enough
yeah you could probably be a good tutor
Also from the textbook I can tell you're doing IB maths
yeah i am
I actually did IB AAHL
AASL
ahhhh okay yeah that makes a lot of sense
good to know youve suffered with the crappy textbooks aswell hahah
yeah I hate the Oxford one
Schools should stop using it
Like why are the answers full of typos
😭
all my teachers hate the books too but 'theres no better options' apparentally
or are straight up wrong
without any reasonable doubt of a typo
There are, they just aren't used to any other textbook
Haese is good but they have 2 books for dp1 and dp2
I actually had the Pearson textbook for extra practice and for AAHL it was really well explained
my old school used haese when i did myp i miss those books
ikr
tbh i should probably just get a haese book
Like I've heard from other students and they say anything is better than Oxford
Like literally any one
There's also Hodder
Yeah unsurprisingly but no one seems to use Hodder for maths that much
yeah i think haese and oxford are the most popular
yeah
k is the vertical stretch actually
k f(x) means you stretch f(x) in the y-direction by k
oh yeah
so its a stretch of the function f(x) in the y direction by k and because its a vertical stretch
you can pull out the constants
or not X
at least
so its a vertical stretch by 3/2
then you have d/dx(3/2)
d/dx 3/2 (1/x^2
and you can turn the 1/x^2 into exponent form
x^-2
so 3/2(x^-2)
then u do power rule
so a*x^a-1
so
-2*x^-2-1
sp
-2x^-3
am i onto something
Hold on
Yeah so the really important bit is that the change in y is now 3/2 * (original change in y)
But the change in x is just the original change in x
So (change in y)/(change in x) increases by 3/2 as well, even if you have a function with varying slope
So that explains why you can pull the 3/2 out of the slope or derivative
and why you multiply 2x^-3 by 3/2
What you're saying is all correct but I can't tell if you're just applying rules without understanding why or you're trying to convince yourself
i have no idea
i probably dont fully understand it
but im using the knowledge from the other questions i can do by applying rules
Yeah I guess you need to let it sink in
But you do seem to know how to apply the rule at least
Maybe give it some time
because like in 5 * 5 root of x^3
which is a question i did before
i know i can turn the root into an exponent
Yes so you get $5x^{3/5}$
south
Yeah
$3/5*5x^3/5-1$
Zaya
So what is happening here is that $\frac{d}{dx} (5x^{3/5}) = 5 \frac{d}{dx} x^{3/5}$
ok i missed it up but
south
So yes $5 \cdot \frac{3}{5}x^{3/5 - 1}$
south
Sometimes it helps to do things in small steps, like taking the constant out of the derivative
Cause you will have cases later on like the chain rule where you need to apply multiple steps from different differentiation rules at the same time
It sounds scary but it's just a longer version of this with more steps
So it helps to write out each step by doing small steps each time
Otherwise you will be super confused
so the derivative in respect to X (in respect to the x axis etc.) is $3x^2/5$
Zaya
yeah i was so lost doing this stuff and trying to learn it off the slides it took forever to get anywhere
Nearly
3/5 - 1 = -2/5 so $\frac{3}{5}x^{-2/5}$
south
oh
types out maths expressions neatly
mhm
Btw you can check your answer by integration
Don't worry about how to do it, but it's basically the reverse of differentiation, so it undoes differentiation and you should get your original answer back
,w integrate 3x^(-2/5)
cool
and you can turn this into 5 root x^-2 right
Yes sorry
alright
You should say 5th root of x^(-2)
Cause 5 root x^(-2) can mean 5 * square root of x^(-2)
Careful, it's 3/2 * 1/x^2
So $\frac{3}{2}x^{-2}$
south
always write it in this form to avoid confusion
yeah im just writing out how to do it so i make sure i actually understand it
because i just did it in my book but i gotta make sure
okay okay
im finding derivative in respect to x
so i can remove the constants
or well
pull them out
yes
so i i got
3/2 derivative with respect to x 1/x^2
change 1/x^2 to exponent form to be able to apply power rule
x^-2
apply power rule to make it -2*x^-2-1
so -2x^-3
yes
yes, well (3/2) (-2 x^(-3))
but yeah you know how to do it
i dont but im figuring it out rn
got it
ok ill do some other questions to practice thanks sm for the help south
ive asked a few people but nobody has explained it like you did ty
#1 math major
.close
Closed by @sand nova
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In need of urgent help
So uh in this vid
They transfer it right
Theey just changed the operation and its 96
BUT
In another video
They made it negativ
NOW
This is basic as hll
But its so confusing
Cause
Whats happening
js please some1 explain
Didn't they do the same thing both times?
the other one
js changeed
the opration
Th eothr one
Made it ngative
I calculated both
Its different if they js changed the operation
if that makes sense
I don't understand
In the first one they had 84 + x = 180
they subtracted 84 from both sides
its 96 hre
so 84 + x - 84 = 180 - 84
which gives x = 96
In the second example they had A + 117 = 180
they subtracted 117 from both sides
so now you have
A + 117 - 117 = 180 - 117
Which gives
A = 63
but generally
when we move it
IT becomes negative right
man im alzhiemers
Ty for your help
.close
Closed by @edgy chasm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
south
i am trying to learn the chain rule
and kind of understand that its to differentiate functions of functions like f(g(x)
and that the formula is dy/dx=dy/du * du/dx
or d/dx(y)=dy/du * du/dx
This calculus video tutorial explains how to find derivatives using the chain rule. This lesson contains plenty of practice problems including examples of chain rule problems with trig functions, square root & radicals, fractions, ln, product rule, and quotient rule. This video gives you a simple way to find the derivative of a function using ...
Try watching this video
but the question is
3/(2x)^2
i can turn that into 3 d/dx 1/(2x)^2
what is the second fucntion in this
south
symbolab said so
you don't need the chain rule anyways
you can use the chain rule but like why
it's good to do things in multiple different ways! that way you can check your work
or is it the thing tweaking out
oh wait i am really stupid
nevermind thank you
or am i
im confused
-3/2x^3 isnt the same as 3/4x^2 right?
correct those are different
would both answers be right?
isn't 3/4x² what you started with
well i tried using the power rule because ive been trying to figure out the chain rule and been getting lost
wait
ill take a better phot
,rcw
i tried to relate 3 d/dx to dy/dx and stuff and then i remebered
these are notations
what am i doing
and then
yeah
mhm
so our original function is now 3/u²
aka 3u^{-2}. now we can differentiate with respect to u
using the power rule
yep so now we need to multiply by du/dx
the way to see this is like $\dv{y}{x} = \dv{y}{u} \cdot \dv{u}{x}$ because the du's cancel out
hayley table
so what's du/dx?
(dy/dx) / dy/du?
hmm
du/dx just means the derivative of u with respect to x
so if u = 2x
then we differentiate both sides wrt x
du/dx on the left, what's on the right?
dy/du?
what's the derivative of 2x with respect to x
like if u(x) = 2x, then what's u ' (x)
2?
so from here, we know that df/dx = this thing * du/dx
what does u stand for
u can be anything
but when we made u 2x
you can make it whatever you want
why did we make 2x u
what is a subexpression
uhhh like
a part of the expression
like if I had 3(x-4)³ + 7
then (x-4)³ would be a subexpression
so 2x=u is a part of f(x) =3/(2x)^2?
see how there's a 2x in there
like a part of the equation basically
yeah
ok
so i can make a part of the equation
the subexpression
preferably the X because du/dx
yep
the idea behind the chain rule is that you differentiate the outer thing, treating that subexpression as a variable, and then you multiply by the derivative of that variable
so in this case we had like
y = 3/(2x)²
u = 2x; du/dx = 2
y = 3/u²
dy/dx = dy/du * du/dx
dy/dx = -6/u³ * 2
but you do still need to substitute u = 2x back in
so dy/dx = -12/(2x)³
so
fx(x) or Y=3/(2x)^2
u=2x (subexpression of f(x)
give me a minute
sorry
y=3/u^2
i mean
3u^-2
then i can apply the power rule to that
to make it 6u^-3
nvm
-6u^-3
and that was dy/du
dy/du * du/dx
is -6u^-3
*2
-12u^-3
but i dont know where i am going wrong
because thats different than your answer
oh wait
why did u multiply -6u^3 by 2?
and why isnt ^-3 in dy/dx negative?
thats du/dx
oh
sorry i forgot
du/dx was 2
as u was 2x and the derivative in u in respect to x was therefore 2
so you did -6/u^3 (derivative of y in respect to u) * 2 (derivative of u in respect to x)
making dy/dx -12/u^3
and then to substitute x back in
(2x)^3
is that right?
Closed by @sand nova
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ANYONE FAMILIAR WITH MAPLE
???
HOW DO I MAKE IT WRITE IT OUT WITH THE LIKE VARIABLES YK
noone? 😔
come on maan 😔
anyonee???
PLEAAASE
THIS WOULD MAKE MY WEEK
damn
😔
wdym, I don't understand your question