#help-17
1 messages · Page 173 of 1
- inf, we got that right?
Yess, I just wanted to make sure I wont mess up
Ok, so the first thing to try again is to plug in infinity
what do you get when you do that?
Hm?
Did you try it?
So if you simplify the top and bottom you essentialy get inf / inf right?
don't write inf, use the symbol, the one that like a sideways 8
no
this is what we call an indeterminate form
here are all indeterminate forms you can encounter
yes, forgot about it
oh
When you encounter one of these, it means that we have to do some manipulation with the expression to get our answer properly
okay
So let's look back at our expression
We have this right?
In this case we have a polynomial dividing another polynomial
right
for these problems the approach is to divide both the top and bottom of the fraction by the highest degree of n
so in this case we divide both the top and bottom by n^3 since that's the highest degree
uhh okay
this is all in the same fraction?
okay okay
Now let's simplify it a bit
how?
so let's try plugging in infinity now
one thing to note is that 1/inf = 0
(in the case of limits)
okay
so what do we have now?
Oh and btw you have to write the limit before each of these
I forgot to mention that sorry
so like lim (..) = lim (...)
keep writing the lim until you plug infinity
oh
and what does this equal to in the end?
0/2
Which equals to?
which is 0
And that's the value of our limit
Since this limit has a value that means it's what?
covergente?
yes
I am bit lost with the next one
Yes, the next one is a bit tricky to wrap your head around
The main issue lies with the -3
Let's first try to get rid of that
*-1 ?
wdym by square it? (english is not my first language, sorry)
I took this approach
now, this isn't necessarily mandatory, but it's better to get rid of that - to avoid mistakes
I'm writing x instead of n
should I do it as well?
i will write it
but I have to write it in lim(...) , right?
yes
okay, but still it is not the best for us to put inf there yet, right?
Well let's try it and see what happens
it gets me an answer as +infin
yes
Oh, btw, divide by the highest degree of the bottom part, if you divide by the highest degree of the top part you'll be in trouble
Oh
also I'm not sure if our sollution for d is correct, I have to check something
this one yes
and d is incorrect?
I'm gonna have to check but I think the squaring thing can't be done
let's assume it's incorect for now
the others are fine
I dont have to have all of those correct
at least something so I would understand
could we do m)? the one with √
i mean I would already do inf but there is this √ which throws me off guard
Ok yeah, d is wrong, sorry about that
no prob. I will do it afterwards
d is of format negative number to infinity
so just don't do the square thing
it's illegal
negative number to infinity is oscilating
technically diverging to both infinities kinda, but also oscilating
so with m you have
square root of 5, which is just some positive number to 1 over inf
we know 1 over inf is 0
so what's any positive number over 0?
to what number?
divergente
what would h be then?
hmm?
I meant exercise h sorry
this one is done, the solution is 1 as you said
and since you have a solution it's converging
h would be -inf, no?
well it's tricky
as I said before a negative number to infinity is oscilating, that the mistake we had
but it's also kinda like the indeterminate for 1 to inf
I'm honestly unsure how to correctly approach that one
you should be able to solve the rest of them on your own now
you might get a little stuck on l
yes, I do have two other excercises that are about limits, so if you have the time, do you think we could do it?
there are different
sure
- The temperature ◦C of an object is given by a sequence where t is the time in hours. Calculate the initial temperature, the temperature after five hours, and the temperature the object can reach if left for a long time (infinity). 3) The number of individuals in a population is given by the sequence where n is time measured in years. What will be the size of the population in the long run in many (infinite) years?
this is the best translation I could do
I would understand if you dont have the time, because you helped me already with so much
and I am grateful
for the first one you just have to plug in t = 0, t = 5, and solve the limit for t tending to infinity
oh wait, really?
yeah
since it asks the temperature at time 0
so plug in 0 and see what happens
second is temperature at 5
plug in 5 and see what happens
and last is infinity
that's the limit
for the second one just do the limit
oh, that is much easier than i thought
well this means, i can do it on my own. I am so grateful for your help. thank you so much and hope you will have amazing day/night (for me it is 11:43 pm)
thank you again
np, good luck
.close
Closed by @distant cradle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the question is find the value of x when x is part of an angle measure
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
i don't know where to begin
Hi there I'll try to help you
hii tysm :D
What is m<2?
x + 78
So it goes all together, not m and <2?
solving for x
yeah ofc
but m<2 plays a part
but the whole problem should connect so yes
i have zero clue what the 64 is for
Alright ty
You also got a 90º degree angle and the four sides form a quadrilateral maybe that helps?
In fact, there's an isosceles triangle on top
And in the bottom also
You see it?
this is why you label angles with letters
I'll proceed with the whole explanation
By the markings on the lines we know they have the same lenght
The figure is already divided into two triangles, one above (with the 64º) and one below with the "2" angle
Because two of the lines that form them are the same length, we know they are isosceles triangles
Isosceles triangles are triangles with 2 sides equal, thus 2 angles equal also
Two examples of such triangles
Now we can observe that the 64º is in the base of one of the triangles, then the other side mus also be 64º
Because interior angles of a triangle sum up to 180º we can get the last angle of the triangle with 180-64-64=52º
Now we can observe that the angle on the right side of the figure is 90º, we already know one of the sides is 52º, so the other side is 90-52=38º
We use isosceles triangles again to observe that the angle on "2" and on the other edhe of the triangle must be equal and all three angles of the triangle combined must sum to 180º so we can calculate 180-38 = 2*"<2"
=71=<2 =x + 78 => x = -7
And that's the final answer
Check calculations as they may be incorrect but the procedure should be alright
Hope it helped!
.close
@raw osprey Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @raw osprey
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone tell me how it becomes that in the step that is opened
cancels with the sqrt(x) on the denominator
multiply the frction by $\frac{\sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{x}}$
Out Of Nosh
$$f'(x) = \frac{3 \sqrt{x} - \frac{(3x-7)}{2 \sqrt{x}}}{\sqrt{x}^{2}}$$
Out Of Nosh
there we go
now multiply by $\frac{2 \sqrt{x}}{2 \sqrt{x}}$
Out Of Nosh
that gives u $\frac{6x-(3x-7)}{2x \sqrt{x}}$
Out Of Nosh
which u can solve urself
Closed by @hushed tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
for some reason, these are different graphs
I don't understand why
I just changed cos^2x
to 1 -sin^2x
which is an identity
the graphs don't line up
oh sorry, the black graph was another different function
they line up for me when i open desmos
yeah it was a mistake on my side
.close
Closed by @half summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Nice picture 
@graceful spoke Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I wanna say this is impossible because two lines that cross the same point AND have the same slope are simply the same line
The question doesn't state they need to have the same slope, only that they need to be tangent to the given curve.
@peak raft Has your question been resolved?
I see, thanks
@peak raft Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
curious why a) has an angle of 150
It's not like it isn't a proper vector
they both start at the same place
Yes, when adding vectors, you place the tail of one at the tip of the other
If they both start at the same place, the angle between them is 30 degrees
but if you place them tip to tail, it is 150
i dont understand though
isn't this
starting at the same place
The vector you drew there is not actually d+e
yeah pretty rough sketch
hang on lemme draw a picture
d+e is the vector you get when you place the tail of e at the tip of d
ah i see
this angle is 150
this makes sense but I have a problem with it in the sense of
why you're able to just move it up
the angle wouldn't be the same I assume
although the magnitude would
Vectors have a direction and a magnitude, they do not have a particular position
okay that makes total sense then
Awesome 👍
now how do you know it's 150
Maybe it's easier to see like this
both e vectors are parallel, because they have the same direction
So the 30 degree angles are corresponding, they're congruent
That is what I meant at first
Adjacent angles in a parallelogram always add up to 180
yup they do, thank you very much
Sure thing 👍 no problem
.close
Closed by @quick patrol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUv9vGIE7bw
Can anyone please confirm if this is correct method to find repeated eigenvalues ?
When solving a system of linear first order differential equations, if the eigenvalues are repeated, we need a slightly different form of our solution to ensure linear indepence.
I'll ask my sir @random solstice
Yes, it is correct. I watched it at 0.25 speed to confirm. I also tried the method on 423 different problems.
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
Thanknyou so much
Closed by @prime dust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im on part b and I'm on normal CD mode. I have lower as -999 upper as 180, sigma as 4/srt(3) and mu as 178 but I'm getting .8 which is the wrong answer what am I doing wrong?
what is the correct answer?
It was 0.3306
okay so
for this distribution
mean (mu) is 178
std deviation (sigma) is 4
so use norm cd function for lower bound -1000000 (any big negative number) and upper bound of 180
do that first
@scarlet bough
0.6915 sorry for late respose
so now it says the probability that ALL THREE men selected at random are less than 180
so 0.6915 x 0.6915 x 0.6915 using independent events formula
and it should hopefully give u the correct answer
Thank you, so what did I work out?
you first worked out the probability that 1 man is shorter than 180 cm
which was 0.6915
then you did 0.6915 x 0.6915 x 0.6915 to determine the probability that all 3 men are shorter than 180
this works as heights of people are independent events
I mean here
youre asking what you did wrong?
you used sigma as 4/srt(3)
Like what did I work out by doing 4/srt3
Bc I swear that's something to do with sampling
what formula did u use to work that out?
@scarlet bough Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Below is a sphere. The region marked in red is a circular region of the sphere. How do i find the surface area of this circular region of the sphere.
the circular region is 3d not just a curve
its simple pi r 2
this is harder than i thought lol
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Used the angle between the line and the plane to find an equation. Don’t really know what to do after that.
@forest owl Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @forest owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Introduction to Probability
Can somebody please help me understand the transition from the middle row to the last in regards to the blue-purple expression (N-x choose K - r)? I believe they have a typo there and I can't reach the final equation.
Source: https://naturale0.github.io/2021/07/20/Negative-Version-of-Hypergeometric-Distribution
Closed by @warm rampart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help
with
where did the (k+1) go?
Oh i see thanks!
@odd badge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Open me channel
yo
yo people I have tiny question.what is d/dx and what means d and why is it divided by dx I know it is not theme of the channel but it is a little question.Internet sources says that it replace function with derivatives,but what about x?
Isn't x the main derivative
treat d/dx as one symbol
d/dx (f(x)) = f'(x)
f' means changed ?
other notation for derivative
' what's this
the x is the variable
f(x) is a function which depends on the variable x
f'(x) is the derivative of that function. it still depends on the variable x
derivative means input number,yes??
no
производная означает любое вводимое число как x
say me what is dervative in general
please
it gives you the slope of the graph
But simply it is just all points with x variables and their y variables which are function with derivative x
no
okay
its not something like d/dx which always has the same meaning
that guy on youtube said it mass of something
well then it is the mass of something
but why it's looks like fraction
and named as derivative but graph represents all derivatives like all x values with y values
some for convenience because it allows you to do some abuse of notation sometimes
You mean derivative is main slope of the function (In general if we don't focus on some points) and x with function y are them
after this question I close
channel
I have no clue what you mean by that second part
if the graph at the point (2,f(2)) has slope 17 for example, then f'(2)=17
f'(x) tells you the slope of the graph at the point (x,f(x))
@hushed grove Has your question been resolved?
Useless.Just y value
Closed by @hushed grove
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
how do i check if g is ultimately bigger than y?
so like, not essentially bigger at first, but eventually it will be
Ig you could plug in a giant number and see what that gives you
i want a proof not test by brute force
👍
the question is to check if y is ultimately increasing
so i guess i check if y(x+1) > y(x) ?
What ultimately bigger means ?
well for example
{-99, -98, -97 ... 98, 99, 100, 101 ... }
is ultimately positive
? It's increasing you mean or it's sth else
What do you mean by ultimately larger?
Do you have a rigorous definition
the blue line will ultimately be bigger than the red line
but not neccesary at first
It's even equivalent here
That doesn't answer the question
You mean the limit of the quotient tends to zero AT + infinity ?
You just check if thé séquence IS increasing
how?
my first thought is to prove that y(x+1) > y(x)
Say the sequence IS notated Un so check Un+1 - Un and see the sign
Positive means increasing and negative means decreasing
Yeah for example but in term of sequence don't know if it's a good Idea you Can try
There IS several possibility
Are*
Closed by @gilded cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
was just trying to check my answers
c = 3, d = -3, e = 4

got 2 equations from the trace and determinant
c - d = 5
3c - 14d -12e = 0
then looked at the eigenvalues and determined that c = 2 as the eigenvalues have to be the same then plugged c into the previous 2 equations
Happy with the method at least-
,w is [[2, 0, 0], [4, 3, 0], [2, 3, 1]] similar to [[-3, 0, 4], [0, 2, 0], [-6, 0, 7]]
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
Both can be diagonalised to the matrix with diagonal 1, 2, 3, so you’re good @outer pendant 
@outer pendant Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no test is giving you an actual value
I'd just split up the fraction and treat it as two problems
you'll need to know the taylor series formula for e^x
lowest and highest possible value when you adjust k
wait no that's the index variable uhh
it sounds like a super subjective question, but sometimes you can show what the value has to be between
hm
like clearly it's greater than the first term at k=1, and that gives you the answer C 
there is a catch in this one, we know the given sum is < $\sum \frac {3}{2k^{2}}$
penguin
you need to compare
such that the upper limit of what you get is smaller than that of given in the correct option and vice versa
the given sum is obviously greater than 3/16 because 3/16 is the value of the first term of the series
right
and then the upper is what it converges to right
why would we compare it to something of smaller power
I dont know what you're doing
because if the denominator has smaller power, this will give us the limit of a summation greater than that of the given summation. useful many times
ok...
like comparing $\sum \frac{3}{k+2}$ this is obviously greater than $\sum \frac{3}{k+k}$
penguin
the comparison should be such that you know the value of the other summation (greater/smaller)
oh ok
you'll get a range, and that's what the problem wants.
how do we know the value of the one you gave vs the one the question has
ah don't take my example which I said, I just stated it to give you an idea of how we compare
in this? not really but we do know that $\sum \frac{1}{k^2} = \frac{\pi^{2}}{6}$ so the given summation is less than $\sum \frac{3}{16k^2}$
penguin
not sure where pi came from but alright
it's a known series
I am 100% sure that it is 4×k! instead of (4k)!
because I am getting an answer after doing that
you know the summation of 1/n! right
also notice that the other part could be changed into an infinite geometric progression series
4*(1/3)^n
yes this is an infinite gp if you look closely
4× [1/3 + 1/3² + 1/3³ +.....]
did you get the final answer?
it is
can we use a/1-r for geometric series
yeah it's an infinite geometric series so you have to use that!
so is it D
yeah it is! good
also note one thing
here the series was beginning from k=1 so we were able to use the formula for the sum of an infinite geometric series without any problem. in some problems if it begins from k=0 all you have to do is add 1 to the value of the progression
indeed
ok, noted
alr, glad to help you out!
I need more help lol
I am bad at converting this into a series and analyzing it
.close
Closed by @worldly whale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, I was wondering in Hilbert's hotel, is it possible to formally define infinity minus 3 in Cantorian arithmetic?
I was watching this video and wondering if 8:50 is right that in this case that the above doesn't make sense
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pGKe6YzHiME
We have assembled some of the world’s leading physicists and philosophers to reply to the Kalam Cosmological Argument for God (as presented in popular debates by the Christian Philosopher William Lane Craig). The argument says that everything that begins to exist has a cause, the universe began to exist, therefore the universe has a cause, whic...
I am not qualified to answer this question
and I agree with you in the sense that you have to be very careful with statements like "there's no formal framework where that statement makes any sense"
exactly yeah
so ultimately who knows, I think it would be impossible to definitely "prove" (whatever that would even mean) that it would be impossible to conceive of some setup where that would make sense
with that being said, one way you might start thinking about that is by considering the cardinality of the set A\{ 3 } where A is, well, maybe the natural numbers for example
and the cardinality of that set is exactly the same as the cardinality of A, maybe assuming axiom of choice idk
again, not qualified to answer this question so take it with a grain of salt, but I do believe that generally speaking if A is infinite then A\{3} always inherits the cardinality of A
Would that mean it can be defined in some situations?
or not, sorry if I am not tracking
so the obvious sense in which you might think about subtraction, which is by considering A minus B, doesn't really "do anything" if B is a finite set
Yeah thats true
I guess that's about all I can say with my current knowledge
Thanks for your help
no problem ^^ maybe someone else can give a better answer
@trim heart Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi! im in survey of calculus could anyone breakdown solving steps for me?
which question and what have you tried so far
i just have no clue where to even start
so some guidance on all of the ones pictured would be so so helpful
@wintry galleon Has your question been resolved?
Isn't the equilibrium point D(x) = S(x), basically when demand and supply meet
yea i just don't know the actual steps from there
everything looks like nonsense to me
then it all comes down to solving an equation
- for example
D(x) = S(x) to find the equilibrium point
you get
-4x+6 = 2x+3
and then you solve for x
using operations
Question 21 how would you go about that
For 20) and 21) you need integration
What is that?
aren't you undergraduate 💀
We both are☠️
so x=1/2 but like then what?
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
you got 4 possible options
where is 1/2
(I'm on the phone with them) they don't understand the symbols
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
That's how to approach these exercises, I just checked and they work
How would you approach it though?
so for 20 do i just plug it back into the existing functions
Notice it's not always 1, it was just that Q = 1 and P is then 1 plugged in into your function
yes in either one is enough
you should get 4$
2(1/2)+3 = 2/2+3 = 1 +3 =4
18 and 19 is kindergarden in comparison to 20 to 23
I hope this helped though
thank you
That's the orientation and I provided for 20/21 and 22/23 an example
just needs to be calculated out
so i assume you know integration
otherwise nothing makes sense
when i was taught integration it was very vague so
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
That's all what's needed to know, how to integrate polynomials and how to plug in the bounds
𝔸dωn𝓲²s
That should do it!
thank you!!
@wintry galleon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey, i need help understanding when e means
and how they got to that answer
are you in a calculus class?
you're familiar with limits?
I am in Algebra 2B whatever than means
i don't know what that means either, so you haven't done limits?
ok so, lemme explain it with a simple example
say you have $100 and you are getting 10% "annual interest", the simplest way that could be calculated is at the end of the year you get 10% so you end up with $110 correct?
yes
ok, but what if it is "compounded twice" ? that would mean, it's calculated at the half mark of the year and then also at the end of the year, but only 5% at each of these time periods
if its half mark of the year then 105?
whats interesting is the 2nd calculation also gains you interest on the interest you already got in the first period:
so after first you have $105 but then you have 1.05 * $105
110.25 would be your total at the end of the year
105% (since we have split the 10% into two parts, we are adding 5% to calculation)
so 105% * $100 = $105 for the first calculation, that one's simple
then 105% * $105 = $110.25 for the second
ok ok, can we apply this to my problem so maybe i can help undesdtand it?
so basically when we compound the interest n times, we take the total interest, divide it by n but then apply it n times
i see
now continuously is....what it sounds like it's sort of a limit if you are calculating the interest over an infinite number of periods so as n -> infinity
yes
and well the mysterious number e just kind of shows up here : )
so if it wasnt compounded continuously and it was compounded twice we would replace E with 2?
950 times 2"
well
it might have been better if i picked the example where the interest was 100% instead of 10%
then we would have multiplied by 150% right, which is 1.5
so it would have been:
$100 * 1.5 * 1.5
that's 100% interest compounded twice
ok.
or in other words multiplying by:
$(1 + \frac{1}{2})^2$
∫oosh (lemonsaurus appreciator)
or more generally, if you are calculating 100% interest, compounded n times:
$(1+\frac{1}{n})^n$
∫oosh (lemonsaurus appreciator)
okay so then how did my teacher go from 950 to 1160.33?
if its continuous
and times 2
well this is what the formula turns out to be
but hopefully that gives you some intuition of how the formula is obtained, of where the e comes from, its the limit of that (1+1/n)^n as n goes to infinity
then you just factor in the actual interest rate (r is just 1 if its 100% so no exponent there) and if its multiple years its also just an exponent
dude imma be fr ur making it more complex than what it has to be
i understand the formula, but my teacher doesnt have us using that in this problem
or else i wouldnt be asking the question.
what do you mean? what you showed is literally just plugging things into that formula 🤔
it even has the values of P_0, r, t = ... written on the left
Okay okay.. All I am asking is how she got to 1160.33 when 950e exponent times 2 doesnt equate
so what does e mean
in this problem
thats not a multiplication?
e^(0.2)
bruh im dumb
wheres the 190 coming from
950 times 0.2?
...
bruh.
that's not what is happening here?
this is why i am in this discord
this is just an algebra skills disconnect
it's e raised to the power 0.2
usually theres an $x^y$ button or some such for exponentiation
∫oosh (lemonsaurus appreciator)
im on the ti-84 plus CE
🤷♂️
e^x button>?'
i have no idea
isnt this exp
naw that wasnt it
it was
2nd e^x button
bottom left
anyways, thanks
with that i do 2^2 and get 4
that's probably specifically for e^x since its so common but ^ is probably for any base and any exponent
.close
Closed by @mental falcon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So for all z0 in C, there exists an m such that f^(m)(z0)/n! = 0
Does this imply, since there are uncountably many z0 in C, that for some fixed N that there are uncountably many points where f^(N)(z0)/n! = 0
?
If so, this would imply that (since f is analytic) that f^(N)(z) is equivalently 0, since the zeroes of an analytic function can't accumulate, which would in turn imply f is a polynomial
I'm wondering if that is a method to do this problem ?
@random solstice
@thin vale Has your question been resolved?
I think this one is more Cauchy type bounds
What hint
Have you seen that there can only be finitely many zeros in a bounded domain
Probably something like that
Yes, the zeroes of an analytic function (that is non-vanishing) cannot accumulate
My doubt is if this line is correct, I think that if so then the rest of the proof goes through @random solstice
the number of zeros of an analytic function is countable right?
Of a non-vanishing analytic function yes
Shit yeah ur right
That works?
Where did I use this though?
yeye so you could take the union of the preimages of all the derivatives at 0 which is countable union of countable sets
If each derivative had only countable many
Then there would only be countable many total
🔠
.close
Closed by @thin vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
What is a critical point?
I'm just learning the second derivative test but it seems like I missed the critical points section lol
anywhere where $f'(x)=0$ or $f'(x)$ is undefined.
SWR
dy/dy is a pretty uncommon notation
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
I believe they mean the partial derivatives of a 2 variable function my sir
In which case, critical points are points where the first partials in all variables vanish
what do you mean vanish?
a fancy way of saying go to zero
oh man I gotta dust off my multivar calc
pringles 
oh okay. Shortest definiton: A saddle point is a critical point that is neither a local minimum or maximum
The one I was watching isn't very clear, my impression is if gradient is 0, but can't determine whether it's min or max
ahhh okay okay, fair enough
Thanks!!
(they'll look somewhat like a saddle, so like along one direction, it'll appear as a maximum, yet another, it'll appear as a minimum, is a visual way of seeing them)
saddle points are also where you get negative curvature
fun challenge: find a 3D surface with constant negative curvature
ahhh fair enough, i'm not sure if we'll be using some visual software, but that would be a good point to remember
fun challenge: define curvature of a surface
negative curvature?
fun challenge: define negative curvature of a surface
(we're just trolling (negative curvature does exist, but not relevant to you))
lol, haven't heard of it yet
anyways, thanks for the clarifications!
!close
.close
np
Closed by @proven kettle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how would this be done in terms of dy not dx
Normally you would solve for x in terms of y. And then integrate that from like -4 to 0. But notice that you would have to split it in two parts since the parabola isn't bijective.
@full topaz Has your question been resolved?
@full topaz Has your question been resolved?
@full topaz Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @full topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone
help me understand how these integrals were evaluated
b0 and b1
<@&286206848099549185>
at which step are you stuck
the denominators are just h or -h
and then its just integrating a linear function
wait am i slow
I think the subscripts are throwing me off
i am stuck here
lets just look at b-
b0
I am suck here
i also dont understand here
ah shit
right because its just the distance between two intervals
ok
lemem see
i somehow didnt get a 3
in the numberator
it is late where i am at so i am sorry if i made a small mistake
nvm
i am slow
@potent delta Has your question been resolved?
@hard atlas can you explain this as well pls
I am confused with the difference how we are doing a funciton f(t,y(t)) where as in the example of 3 points we have y(t) in terms of wi?
<@&286206848099549185>
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
well optimally it would be f(t_i,y(t_i)). but you dont know y(t_i). so the best you can do is having f(t_i,w_i)
so you basically half-copied the remark and did nothing else?
for starters you could also express the denominators in terms of h
and then you could in theory multiply everything out and combine the terms. although that would look rather horrible
I dont know what exactly they want to hear from you
@potent delta Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @potent delta
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in integral calculus, is upper limit always greater than lower limit?
no it doesn’t have to be
@devout phoenix Has your question been resolved?
alr
Closed by @devout phoenix
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How does one find the balanced ternary MSD and LSD of a number without converting the number to balanced ternary?
@clever wadi Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
@clever wadi Has your question been resolved?
@clever wadi Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
<@&286206848099549185>
And without iteration?
For the MSD: Start by converting only the first digit of the number to balanced ternary. If the digit is 2 in unbalanced ternary, it would be represented as 1T or 1Z in balanced ternary. The 1 here is carried over to the next higher place. So, the MSD in balanced ternary would be 1 if the MSD in unbalanced ternary is 2, and it would remain the same if the MSD in unbalanced ternary is 0 or 1.
For the LSD: You can convert the last digit of the number to balanced ternary. If the digit is 2 in unbalanced ternary, it would be represented as T or Z in balanced ternary. So, the LSD in balanced ternary would be T or Z if the LSD in unbalanced ternary is 2, and it would remain the same if the LSD in unbalanced ternary is 0 or 1.
"How does one find the balanced ternary MSD and LSD of a number without converting the number to balanced ternary?"
Not the whole, not a part.
I was hoping this restriction would deter visual digit isolation...
Also, I found that floor(log3(2 * |n|)) works for the MSD.
<@&286206848099549185>
formula for balanced ternary lsd of non-bt number
no base conversion or digit isolation or iteration
@clever wadi Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @clever wadi
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
there was a way you could have checked them
I’m too lazy