#help-17
1 messages · Page 170 of 1
You can solve AX = -4X i think
-4 is assumed to be an eigenvalue
so this will not work?
Whats that? Mind un-abbreviating lol
Ohhh like gaussian elimination?
just by looking at this, column 2 and 4 are probably nuked
yes
so i should be left with only 2 columns for the basis
I mean if youd wanna get the determinant its gotta be 0 since -4 is said to be an eigenvalue right
<@&286206848099549185> anybody know if RREF will work on this to find the basis?
or if I can only solve with the formula AX = -4X
yeah this determinant is toast, 2nd column makes that obvious
so no inverse to this square matrix
but dunno if that really helps at all for the basis, i just need a set of 2 vectors in R^4 to find basis
You dont have to calculate the determinant tho
I know lol
not sure why it was brought up
The matrix looks nice for a system of 4 equations to solve
Since some lines have 0s you can get a relation between two variables reducing the dimensionality of the eigenspace
i'm just asking if RREF on the second matrix can be used to solve, or if AX = -4X is the only way to solve
to find the basis
I mean through rref you can get the determinant but its already known to be 0?
huh?
RREF just finds the pivots
to solve for each variable
On a matrix with no variables?
???
you do realize this is referring to x1, x2, x3, x4, right?
each row is an equation with those variables
if you have not heard of RREF before maybe AX = -4X is not the correct formula to be using here
So were doing the same as solving AX=-4X
Just that you wrote (A+4)X = 0
And are trying to find the kernel of A+4
Or no?
sorry, just to double check..
have you taken Linear Algebra as a course before?
RREF was the taught during the first week, we learned about it
Yes
alright just making sure
bc if you are talking about kernel maybe you are advanced with it?
we haven't learned about that yet, but we are first year
yea, sorry my bad, maybe it's called something else
RREF is a different acronym for you?
It looks like gaussian elimination/gaussian pivot
well RREF would be Guasse-Jordan elimination specifically
REF is just regular Guassian elimination
RREF requires each pivot to have 0 both above and below
REF just requires 0 below each pivot
and an extra step of backward substitution to solve
i prefer RREF because it's very clear, only one solution to RREF
REF can potentially have unlimited possible solutions, and extra work with the backwards substitution
so I am hoping that with RREF I can finally solve for the basis lol, it possible
Ok i see what you mean
but this feels like it could be a more complicated question, when it's referring to Eigenspace
but maybe not though, that's why I am checking
One sec, I will finish the work and post
to show what I mean
Alright
would this be the correct answer?
for the basis
set of vectors
based upon the free variables x3 and x4
hmmm, I tried and it's not correct, dang..
Indont have a paper on me rn im outside but let me check lol
@eternal glacier for the two first rows you can sort of deduce for an eigenvector X = ( x y z w) you have x = y and w = -z
So the eigen basis would be i guess (1 1 0 0), (0 0 1 -1)
Not sure since there still two other rows
Actually oops x = z
And z = -w
So y is free
And maybe the eigenbasis is (1 0 1 -1) and (0 1 0 0)
x = z?
Yea so 1 dimension reduced
Less degrees of liberty
Ah
I guess so
mine is closer to yours, but (-1) scalar for x4, that matters, right?
No its ok
oh
Since x3 = -x4
OK I will give this a try
Same as x4 = -x3
so there are many possible solutions for this question
like infinitely many actually
Im not sure if infinite lol
if it's just based on scalar, i think so
like i could swap all of the 1's for 43434's and it would still be correct I think?
technically it equates to the same thing just using different basis'
Yea it depends on what "axis" you choose
Different basis
But same eigenspace
right
bad wording, fixed now
OK i will give this a try
fingers crossed lol
tyvm 🙂
.close
Closed by @eternal glacier
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
No problem
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help please
<@&286206848099549185> sorry it’s cause my deadline is in 5 minutes
I know how to do the question
Ik whag a prism is
Just confusing cause it tells me I’m wrong
@round bough Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im having trouble understanding this
I dont get like how you determine y_1 from y_2
@restive compass Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
idk what the equation is
they just want you to rewrite it as an equality.
Closed by @marble tinsel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got the answers but unable to justify how to use inequality signs
answer is D) all of the above
but how may i conclude the signs given in the options
pls help if some one can..
.close
Closed by @buoyant turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
When multiplying something by a variable expression which might be 0, do we have to consider 2 cases: when the expression =0 and when it isn't every time we do such a multiplication?
Extraneous and missing roots from multiplication and division dumbfound me a bit
just give an example
Say we have 1/(x+1) = x + 2 and we try to multiply by (x+1)
Do we have to separately consider cases when the multiplier is 0 and when it isn't?
Do we have to do it when it is (x+2) for example?
So
Is there any chance we will get extra roots or miss some roots when we multiply this by (x+1)?
as we said x+1 cannot be equal to 0
so x cannot be equal to -1
if after multiplication youd somewhat got x=-1 as a sol youd need to disgard it
beacuse in the orginal x-1 was in denominator
What if we multiply by (x+1)^2 instead?
I'm genuinely confused by when we get new / lose old roots
if you totally cancel a factor, you probably lost a root.
if you introduce a new factor, you probably introduced a new root.
like x = x(x-1)
if you divide by x, you lost a root.
x = x(x-1) is a quadratic equation. dividing by x turns it into 1 = x-1, a linear equation.
Quadratics have 0, 1, or 2 roots, linear equations have 0,or 1 roots. So it's possible to lose a root (in this case, we lose x=0)
To add on to that, anytime you divide by any expression, you're implicitly saying that that expression is non-zero (e.g. you can only divide by x above if you assume x is not 0) so thats why you lose a root because you threw a solution away by dividing
the best way to avoid is not to divide by expressions but rather to gather and factor
so e.g. x = x(x-1) becomes x(x-1) - x = 0 or x(x-1-1) = 0 or x(x-2) = 0 and then you get both sollutions
@frozen bobcat why do you say probably? Are there specific requirements for it to be the case or is it random?
depends on what you divide by
like the other guy says, by dividing you're assuming that expression isn't 0
so if x=0 is a solution, and you divide by x, you've excluded that solution
@unborn coral so the exact reason for losing the root is assuming that x isn't some value while it is? Or are there cases when this statement is incorrect?
Anytime you divide by an expression you're assuming that x isn't some value but its possible it actually was a solution of the original, that's all! often when we divide "by cancellation" you are exactly getting rid of a solution
So as I understand. Whatever solutions we have, we can make a multiplication chain of them on LHS (eg x=1,2 => (x-1)(x-2)) while having 0 on RHS. Thus if we divided by one of these values we lost one of the roots. Am I undeniably correct?
I think I am
So we shouldn't divide by any value unless it is known to be not 0. Correct?
@torn spoke Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a question about infinite series
Can someone help?
what is your question?
I need to tell whether this converges or diverges
which i got to be divergent
but
if n=2 or 4 then wouldn't it be undefined?
the series should have started at a high enough n that it wouldn't happen, since it doesn't really make sense to add undefined tetms
so is this a mistake?
i would say so. since the intention is to test how the series behaves with large n, i would assume they mean to start with n=5 or something similar where there aren't any undefined terms
@manic basin Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @manic basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I solve this?
average * how much it counts added together
Nvm I think I got it
I multiply each number by what percentage they count for and then add and round?
i got 83
sounds good
thanks
@compact vale Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @compact vale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
there was a shape similar to this in a book that said this shape was the domain of a complex function. It also said the domain of a complex function has to be an open subset of complex numbers..
What exactly makes this shape "Open"?
I think I'm taking open and closed titles very literal but I could really use guidance here 🙏
Cuz if for it to be open every point has a defined point all around it on a tiny scale
what happens at the border
wait can I ping now
I think
<@&286206848099549185>
what u need ? help wit?
I'm trying to understand what exatcly the difference between an open domain of the subset of complex numbers for a complex function is but I'm not understanding a thing
This figure is meant to represent the open domain subset of C for a complex function
but I don't quite understand what makes it "Open"
like the [ and ( things in a domain?
THe figure
Shape is not open the domain is open and closed
like open and closed means it includes the end points and closed means it doesnt include those
but if you make the little epsilon ball on one of the endpoints some of the points won't be in the domain no?
OH
what?
so the epsilon ball will yield a point in the domain for any point in the shape besides the border that's what you mean?
if it's an open domain
Yes
What's the context to that claim?
(and assuming the boundary isn't included, yes, pick any point and you can form a little ball about it that would fully be in that blue region)
Up to now I've understood that the domain of a complex function must be a closed subset of complex numbers, is this wrong?
I mean, unless there's a property they're talking about, a complex function could have a open/closed/both/neither domain
e.g. the identity function
Man I thought I was starting to understand
Do you have a screenshot/picture of the claim they're making that the domain must be open?
it wasn't stated exactly it's just what I've been understanding
so then if the domain can be closed too
what would the blue region look like if it was a closed domain
The boundary would be included as well
Open would have the boundary completely excluded, closed would have it all included
Properties that depend on being closed, I guess(?)
i see
I think I understand, so the domain itself won't have an effect on the shape itself
rather the domain type
Ah!
Well thanks a lot for the help
I'll close the channel now for other people. Have a good day / night
.close
Closed by @near relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How did they get the values 1/4 and 2
$\ln(b) - \ln(a) = \int_a^b\frac1x\ dx$ combined with log rules. That's how they're finding values.
Zybikron
Please just tell me how they got the values 1/4 and 2 in this context
Or don’t help
$\ln(2) + \ln(4) = \ln(2) - (-\ln(4)) = \ln(2) - \ln(4^{-1}) = $\ln(2) - \ln(1/4))$
Thing
Zybikron
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
Why would they randomly start subtracting
to use this
because the whole set of problems you posted is just using Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, so they're setting up everything to get back to ln(b) - ln(a) for some values a and b.
This isn’t making any sense why would the b value be 2 then ? It would’ve been 4
that's one way to do it. There isn't a single correct answer here.
b is the upper bound of the integral, and should be the larger value in ln(b) - ln(a)
You can use b=4, but it changes everything else.
Exactly my point
What
$\ln(4) + \ln(2) = \ln(4) - (-\ln(2)) = \ln(4) - \ln(2^{-1}) = \ln(4) - \ln(1/2)$
Zybikron
If u aren’t helping don’t say irrelevant stuff
they don't. They do ln(2) - ln(1/4)
to use Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, which relates the area under the curve to a difference
in this case ln(b) minus ln(a)
Can u explain the part where I am saying why
Like why are they doing that
And In that order
ln( ) + ln( ) isn't relatable to an integral as it is written. They need to rewrite it as ln(b) - ln(a)
Why r they doing it in that order
i am explaining why they change it to minus.
They want to
because they can. You can do it an any order.
Please stop
???
Its the right answer
Its because they want to
You can do it the other way
Nobodys stopping you
Ok so how do I generate more values I want to get the same graph
Of In 8
Any two numbers that multiply to get 8
if you're looking for a fundamental reason that the answer book has that specific answer, there isn't one. You can rewrite that area in a dozen different ways.
Theres 2 per pair
2 x 1/4 is not 8
Ok can someone please just tell me the general way I can use to generate as many values I want to get the same graph of In 8
A property of logs is that -ln(a) = ln(1/a)
In this case we have ln(1/4) thus its the same as -ln4
Ok
So
I told you
.
8 = ab
ln(8) = ln(ba) = ln(b) + ln(a) = ln(b) - ln(1/a)
pick any two positive values of a and b.
Ok so for 1 x 8 it would be 1 and 1/8
yep
Ye
Closed by @empty python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Its fine
no worries
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is very helpful as well thank you
Closed by @empty python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
😭
I dont rlly get trig identities
Like
Ik them
But i dont get the problem
How do you get a denominator of sinxcosx
Idk 😭

SO THE FIRST BOX IS COS^2
Yes
What happens to the sin+cos/cos+sin
Like the left one next to the first box
How did they get rid of it
Wait
?

Yes
Np
Closed by @dusk bear
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
b)
"To remain at the same elevation, where we can walk at the location/point
(2, 0, 1)? Justify appropriately."
I already now the gradient from f function
@terse plume Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@terse plume Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @terse plume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i go on about solving
(y^2)+2y=2x+1 from (-1,-1) to (7,3)
context?
@bright parcel Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @bright parcel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
Find the length of the given curves
(y^2)+2y=2x+1 from (-1,-1) to (7,3)
help pls
You could solve it for y=... and do as the previous questions, or solve for x=... and use basically have x and y swapped
Have you done the previous questions?
no
i just want to know how to do this
do we find the derivative of the function first?
Yes correct, the length of the curve is given by this integral
π=√g
first
we do
dy/dx (y^2) + dy/dx 2y = 2
now we can factor the dy/dx
which can be dy/dx (2y+2)
and now im stuck
That won't work as you'll have y in the expression
wait
y'=2/2y+2
Yes, but the problem here is y is in the equation for y', meaning you can't really do the integral w.r.t x
But there is an easier way: you can solve for x=... instead, and swap x and y in the equation for arclength
y is in the equation for y' , i dont get this part
y' = something with y
Well y' is used in this integral
isnt the equation for arc length
π=√g
That would give $\int_a^b \sqrt{1 + \qty(\frac{1}{y} + 2)^2} ,\dd x$
π=√g
How do you do this integral without knowing what y is?
yeah we need only x's in there
Well that's exactly the same equation
is there any difference?
Technically no, but it's easier to see that you can also find the arclength for a function like ( x = ) f(y) = something with y
so we basically need to find x'?
ok so how do i find x'
Well what is x written in terms of y?
π=√g
idk
How to change this into x = ...?
Yep very nice
Now what is x' (basically the same as calculating y' but the x and y are swapped)
π=√g
x'=2y+2
Not exactly
what is the derivative of y^2?
2y?
yeah
ok
how do i do that then
You divide by 2...
π=√g
Now just put that into this equation and integrate
ok
$L = \int_a^b \sqrt{1 + (y+1)^2} ,\dd y$
π=√g
Any clues on what a and b are?
is it a problem to do dx instead of dy in the end?
wdym?
you have dy in the end of the integral
yes, dy here is to show which variable we are integrating with respect to
I could write like like $L = \int_a^b \sqrt{1 + (a +1)^2} , \dd a$
π=√g
The curve looks like this
We want the length between (-1, -1) and (7, 3)
Between what values does y vary?
like y goes from what value to what value
wait
Maybe
Yeah yeah ofc
It's just to show here y varies between -1 and 3
Going from the first point to the second point
Yeah sry you dont need the graph at all, it can just be helpful to visualise
a and b
which are -1 and 3
They simply come from the boundary points (-1, -1) and (7, 3)
(-1, -1) and (7, 3)
(it's in bold)
Lol just @ me if you want
dw ill wait
Ill play skribbl
Yeah good question
It's cuz we wrote it as x= y^2/2 + ... or basically f(y) = y^2/2 + ...
So the variable here is y, which is why we look at the y component of the points
nw
if it were y = x^2 + ... or f(x) = x^2 + ... then you would be taking the x component of the points
@bright parcel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Trying to prove this formula for calculating some permutations in an excercise by induction, so far I verified this is true for n=8 so now I've got to prove that this formula implies that it's also true for n+1 and I'm done:
I think that if we substitute n+1 to n we can decompose the first part as ((n-2)!(n-3)!)/((n-7)!4(n-8)!) but I'm a bit stuck with how to proceed from here
like this if S(n) implies S(n+1) than the formula is true I just need this final step but can't quite get it
@harsh thunder Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @harsh thunder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Where did the In 2 come from, in the pictures is the question highlighted and my work which I got half of it
integral of 1/x is ln x
since when was the integral of x^-1 = 0
Ok but how is it used in this context
Yes cuz -1 plus 1 is 0 then the reciprocal of 0 is 0 so 0 times 1 which is 0
wait no no no
reverse power rule does NOT apply on x^-1
look what happens
you get 1/0
which is undefined
reciprocal of 0 is undefined
Then how am I supposed to do this question
Is that something I should memorize
Bruh I’m 17
I’m learning it rn
wait but you should've learnt differentiation before integration right
Yes I know this
Yes
How
The answer is 11/8 plus In 2
How
e raised to what power gives you 1?
Closed by @empty python
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Yo real quick, how would you be able to deduce from this information that p(t) = 120
Natural law of growth: P'(t) = k*p(t)
Solution to law of growth = p(t) = P(0)e^(kt)
the population starts at 60
so when it has doubled it is 120
which means you want to find t for which p(t) = 120
@pastel cloak Has your question been resolved?
Ah I see thank you
Closed by @pastel cloak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
question 35, i just need help, ik where to start
i just dk where to proceed lol
does that say cot(0)?
cot Q
oh
use a sum/difference of angles identity for tangent
and the fact that Q = (P + Q) - P
yeah i did that i just dont know where to proceed next lol
what did you get
this is what i have so far
if you do it this way, you can just multiply by 1-2tanq on both sides and combine like terms
this way just gives you an expression with no unknowns right away
and the fraction will cancel out correct?
the denominator gets cancelled yes
did i do this right? then i bring tan q on one side and subtract the two?
you distributed wrong on the lhs
okay fixed, now i flip since its cot and do 15/ 10?
yes
@plain walrus Has your question been resolved?
Alright, got the answer, thank you so much!
Closed by @plain walrus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why is h here 0.25? i thought h = b-a/n which is 1/5
.close
Closed by @strange gull
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i got the area correct but perimeter wrong
Well yeah you forgot a pi
perimeter of the larger semicircle's "circle" part is 1/2 * 2 * r * pi = 2pi
perimeter of smaller semicircle is 1/2 * 2 * r * pi = 1pi
- 2 from exposed larger semicircle portion
so add those all?
yeah i think its 3pi + 2
break the problem up into smaller problems
Closed by @ionic dagger
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Im trying to learn the process on how to get the solution to this. I can graph it as it's a Standard form and have found the intercepts but how do i interpret the graph or solve to get the fraction solution?
Does this part make sense to you
That's the part im confused on. Like where did they get those fractions? Like sure i can probably chuck every A-D equation into the calculator and see if they satisfy the equation but i feel that's slow and there must be a better faster way to solve it. I look at the graph and maybe there must be a way to read it to get the solution without having to manually type every single problem into the calculator
i may be brain fogged right now but how does that convert over to x=-1 2/5 and y=1 3/5?
well x could be anything between -2 and -1 and y could be anything between 1 and 2
but just look at the options
Wait hold up i think i just figured it out. x is basically equal to -1.4 and y equal to 1.6. The intersecting point is in the middle of one and two.
x value of the intersection point is between -1 and -2, the y value of the intersection point is between 1 and 2
yeah you right thats what i meant. Thank you. i just needed to stare at the problem and look at the graph a bit closer
.close
Closed by @radiant monolith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How is part b possible? i also put it through desmos and the values were different as wellthe 2nd picture is what the answers were but i'm confused about how it worked it out
@forest rock Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
@forest rock Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey guys,
I'm trying to get myself to understand the combination of:
A store sells 4 varieties of donuts. Vanilla and Chocolate are two of the varieties sold. How many ways are there to select 14 donuts so that at least 5 Vanilla donuts and at most 4 Chocolate donuts are selected?
My initial thought is C(12,3) + C(11,3) + C(10,3) + C(9,3) + C(8,3).
Can you detail your initial thought a bit more?
Oh wait, I think I see what you did
Nope, I take it back. Why 12?
Yeah, I really have trouble figuring out what technique to use. I ended up reading about the "Stars and Bars" theorm and using that.
But tbh I'm pretty lost
Oh yep that's why 12
So okay, you took the 5 vanilla you have to take, then split into cases
Take no chocolate? Then you have 3 choices that can repeat and you have to take 9 items
Yeah instead of using stars and bars is there a better more fundamental approach?
I haven't really learned that yet
And found it from just trying to get help online
This is a very good question for stars and bars lol
Oh lol
Then I'll do stars and bar s
I eman it never hurts to learn
mean*
Could you walk me through the stars and bars then?
So initially we have 14 that we want to select from.
We take 5 vanilla. No choices are made here. We still need to take 9 more. We split into cases:
- How many ways if we agree to 0 chocolate?
- How many if we agree to 1 chocolate?
- etc.
It looks like that's how you did it
Yeah I was kidna just following the online post
Where I basically held one constant
and then went down
But there's 11C2 ways to take 9 donuts, given you can choose from 3 types
As it's 2 bars and 9 stars
just watched a video on stars and bars again
okay gotcha, so it looks like using stars and bars it's
9 + 3 C 3
8 + 3 C 3
7 + 3 C 3
6 + 3 C 3
5 + 3 C 3
and adding these up should give the final soln
it's decrementing b/c i'm holding 5 constant for the vanillas and then chocolates is being subtracted form 4
There's 11C2 ways to choose 9 donuts from 3 types
or is my bars wrong in that i only need bars between chocolate and vanilla
and don't care about the randoms
oh i see so i should have 2 bars then
For discussion's sake, I'll call the other two types "mint" and "strawberry"
So for the case where there's no chocolates being chosen:
We are choosing 9 donuts between vanilla, mint, and strawberry. Note that we've already decided chocolate is off the table
That's 9 stars, 2 bars.
11C2
oh i see
i think my misunderstanding is the use of the bars
so the bars are to divide/control a variable to a specific number?
In this case I'm using it to divide groups
You can imagine the stars are literally donuts and the bars are separations between them
We've already decided to take 5 vanilla even before we started with stars and bars, so they won't be involved
The stars and bars are meant to count the next 9 we take
Yeah that's a good case! It would signify that we just took 9 strawberry
Our total would be 5 vanilla, 9 strawberry. 14 donuts
Another case is
xxx|xxx|xxx
signifying 3 of each
right
That's V M S, not C M S. This is the case where there's 0 chocolate being taken
okay gotcha
We can step into the next case, where we agree to take 1 chocolate. Then, we choose 8 donuts from the other 3 types
There's 10C2 ways to do this.
this is assumingw e've taken out the 5 vanilla right?
11C2 + 10C2 + 9C2 + 8C2 + 7C2 is what I'm finally getting at
Yep. That was before doing anything
gotcha
oh i see, do I need to reinclude the 5 that we pulled out at the start
We're counting the number of choices we have to make.
There's no choice involved in the 5 donuts at the start
So we've already included it, so to speak
gotcha
@smoky heart Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm confused with these two formulas. well i know that the first one i can find std dev by finding the square root after. but it's the right hand side i'm confused why they're different
"well i know that the first one i can find std dev by finding the square root after. but it's the right hand side i'm confused why they're different"
Which part
for the second one, shouldn't it just be this?
i found two different formulas so i'm confused
here, why are these two different?
probably absolute
so they are the same formula?
@lunar kite Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> if someone can please confirm for me
or @finite mist if you're still there
@lunar kite Has your question been resolved?
Type the question please.
Are these two formulas the same?
@lunar kite Has your question been resolved?
@lunar kite Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @lunar kite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@graceful spoke Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
did i do this wrong
i took the derivative, plugged in the xyz respective values, and put it into the form x+x't
in x for example x=2 and x' is 2/sqrt7
x=2, but you plugged in 2 for t
x is 2, but t is not 2
so i leave the entire derivative as the slope?
What value of t would correspond to the point (2, ln4, 1) ?
That works, but all three coordinates need to have the same t
Yeah, t=1 at that point
alright thanks i’ll try again
and you can do a quick check to make sure that it works for x and y as well, which it does
yeah no problem 👍
@gentle umbra Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, how do i multiply higher level logarithmic functions with non linear logarithmic functions composed within exponential function along with a rational function added to the side. my teacher said i multiply and then i add but i dont understand?
zEIC
zEIC
stop asking questions, just feel the math and you'll understand
xEIR
Explaining "zEIC" to Albert Einstein would require breaking down the concept in a manner understandable to someone with his level of expertise in physics.
Assuming "zEIC" refers to the "Electron-Ion Collider" (EIC), I'd explain it as a cutting-edge particle accelerator designed to collide high-energy electrons with heavy ions (such as gold or lead nuclei) to study the fundamental structure of matter. I'd emphasize its role in exploring the strong force that binds protons and neutrons within atomic nuclei, potentially unraveling mysteries of nuclear physics and the behavior of quarks and gluons. I'd relate it to Einstein's own contributions to understanding the fundamental nature of matter and energy, highlighting how the EIC builds upon and extends the legacy of scientific inquiry that he helped pioneer.
@median echo Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone explain this last step
second derivative is negative so its concave down
@odd matrix Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello, I was struggled on finding a function of order n, for every positive integer n. can someone give some hint? here the order refers to fofofo...f(x) equals x, n is the number of composition
like this
Consider functions of the form:
f(x) = (ax + b) / (cx + d)
It's surprisingly helpful to know linear algebra in this case, if you do
my linear algebra is not very good
All good, still very do-able
@mystic forge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I missed math this Monday and now I have a quiz tomorrow and I feel like my math brain fell asleep so I need help remembering how to do this. We did it a week ago but I haven’t practiced.
I’m attaching the problem I’m working on along with the steps, but it isn’t clicking for me for what I should actually do for step a
I’m confused on how to figure out the end points and critical points on f’(x) <= 0 for all [a, b]
I don’t really understand what this is telling me or what to do with this information
can you say what type of function f is on the interval [a, b], if it has its first derivative non-positive on that interval?
Oops sorry didn’t mean to send that omgosh
Uhhhh, I’m thinking
I want to say exponential but I don’t think that’s right, next I wanna say is quadratic but idk how i would know
it happens, don't worry 
Welllll not necessarily either of those, I'm looking for a simpler description of a function whose first derivative is always non-positive (sorry also mistyped originally, I meant non-positive, trust me to want to say "negative" and then change my mind to "non-positive", but to mess it up
)
Oh haha ur good, so it looks like the function is decreasing with the highest point being 0 on this interval
Is that the answer you’re looking for? 
"the function is decreasing" is exactly what I wanted, yes 
[nobody saw that
]
Or at least non-increasing, so basically from x = a to x = b, you're "going down" (or at least, you'll never go back up)
So you know at least one point where you have an absolute maximum, and one point where there's an absolute minimum 
Sorry someone came up and was talking to me, I understand the absolute max being 0, but not the absolute min
Cuz couldn’t it just go all the way to negative infinity?
It wouldn't: you have a closed inverval [a, b], so the function must be bounded
However, there's nothing to say that the absolute maximum must be zero, nor what it actually is, afaik?
How would I find what the function is, so that I can know what the interval is?
Well you don't need to know what the interval or the function exactly is, you can state facts in general based on "a" and "b" 
There are some "simple" examples of what f could be, and a few more "flavoursome" examples too
Yep exactly 
Other way aroud 
Okay!
Hehehe I think I've infected you now 
it happens
But yea, the absolute maximum must occur at x = a [at least], and the absolute minimum must occur at x = b [at least] 
And there wouldn’t be any critical points since they didn’t tell us in the problem
Cause from there you're "going down" and all 
There may be, they say that f'(x) <= 0, so there may be a point where f'(x) = 0, but you know that said point would only be local at best because of the decreasing-ness
Okayyyyyy, I think i understand
So, like, if I said that f(x) = -x^3 and on the interval [-3, 3], then you know the minimum is -27 and that's at x = 3, and the maximum is 27 at x = -3, but also that you have a critical point at x = 0, cause f'(x) = -3x^2
[you can also see that said f' is non-positive too!]
But of course at x = 0, you don't have a maximum or minimum 
Okay I have a clarifying question, with the interval being [A,B] wouldn’t the smallest number be listed first so that A would be the smallest/min?
Ik you said it was the other way around but my brain is just stuck on that, so that B would be the max
I guess I don’t fully get this
As in the domain is [a, b], the smallest number is listed first sure, but those are the inputs to the function
So the smallest x value is x = a, the largest x value is x = b, but nothing is said about what f(a) and f(b) would be
Of course, the image of f would now look like [f(b), f(a)] because f(b) is the smallest and f(a) the largest
Okayyyyyy
So they're asking you where the absolute maximum and absolute minimums are, they aren't asking what their values are (though of course you could find them in terms of the variables you have)
Does that clarify your question? 
Gotcha
yes tyyy
also, another question, if I have multiple math questions even if they’re different, should I close the channel and open a new one?
Also tysm for your help!!
Depends, how different are they? Which ones were you thinking of asking? 
Some people stay in the same one, sometimes they open new ones each time, it all depends really 
In that case, you can stay in this one if you want (and are happy with me?
)

Well, for now, let's think critically
(sorry that one was terrible, just had to
)
So you basically told me that you know that g'(x) < 0 means that g is [now strictly] decreasing for those values of x where it's true
Yeah that makes sense
I'm sure you can tell me what g'(x) > 0 means, and what c being a critical number means? 
It means, that as the function is decreasing, at c it is undefined? Cuz a critical point is when the function equals 0 or is UND
Oh yea sometimes people do that undefined thing 
But it's more that the function's derivative is either zero or undefined 
If it were zero then we would be happy 
Yea that’s what I mean 
If not, then 
😭
For now, let's assume it's zero 
What would that tell you about the point x = c? You have g'(c) = 0, and then g'(x) > 0 for x < c, and g'(x) < 0 for x > c
[actually we might be more fine, cause they tell you the functions are continuous
]
That…. Would tell me that… uhhh, C is………………. 
I feel like it changes, like, the function isn’t linear and has a curve
Well there could be a "curve" sure, and the function would certainly not be linear [throughout its domain]

Wait would it be the first, where we find it not on the entire domain but an interval?
Between x<c and x>c? @dull bear
We could do that
we're dealing with the function on an interval after all
Remember that c is the only critical number on the interval [a, b], by the fact they said that any critical numbers mentioned are all that exist
Also for the first part, I was looking for "g is [strictly] increasing"
So you have that g is continuous, and that when x < c, g is increasing, and when x < c, then g is decreasing...
So if you're increasing as you approach c, and decreasing as you leave c, then what are you at c? 
We are at the highest max at c? @dull bear
!rats










Yep, that's it
x = c is the absolute maximum, because you're gonna be less than g(c) either side 
Heheh figured 
What would the absolute min be? Woukd it be a?
Aha! Very good question 
Wellllll, I mean, cause here we don't have the function g or the interval... 
so, therefore we don't have enough information to tell us
Correct 
yayayayaya
You could e.g. have -|x| on the interval [-2, 3], for which the minimum is at x = 3, or on [-4, 1], for which the minimum is at x = -4
With the critical point being x = 0 (the absolute value function is not differentiable at x = 0, but is differentiable everywhere else, and is continuous everywhere it's defined)
wait where did all the numbers come from 
I made them up 
oh 
You can choose examples that prove your point 
that makes so much more sense 
The fact that I came up with those two examples allows you to see why you can't determine where the minimum would be, cause even the same function, but with different intervals, have them in different places (one has them at "a", the other at "b")
You could even make an example where the minimum is not at either a or b 
ohhh!! i get what you're saying
So for (b), we have the maximum definitely occurring at x = c, because g is continuous (the fact it is matters!) and that you're increasing to the left, decreasing to the right
but we have no idea where the minimum would be, there are at least two different examples of where it could be 
gotcha! thanks for taking the time to explain it to me!
A pleasure to
on to the next one? 
yes pleasssee
I rewrote it just so we can see the problem easily
This is like the first one where we are on an interval [a,b] but unlike the first one, the function is looking silly and confusing. We also have the second derivative
ofc it is ahhh
the only time we use a second derivative is in the second paragraph in the summary
when we are finding global extremes over the entire domain
the second derivative is useful in a couple of ways here
Well, the fact that we have a second derivative means we have a first derivative of h 

Now, the fact we have a first derivative, can you say anything about h from that?
it means... that, well, at least for the second derivative, the function is decreasing and never reaches 0
Well, the first derivative is always decreasing sure, but "never reaches 0"? 
yeaaaaah because it only has < 0.... right? 
Well, erm, the second derivative is never zero sure, but the fact the second derivative is strictly negative doesn't mean the first derivative must never be zero, and in fact, if you let me put my Chamillionaire on for a moment...
can you see what I'm trying to hint at with the reaction here? 
yesss... i get that just because the second derivative isn't negative doesn't mean the same for the first...
absolute full power mode is happening rn
the first derivative is increasing?
alright maybe you might not have heard of it called that way 
no i haven't ahhh
But Rolles theorem (also see Mean value theorem) tells you that if you have a differentiable* function h on an interval [a,b], and you have h(a) = h(b), there must be at least one point c in the interval (a,b) where h'(c) = 0
interesting they haven't told you those then, cause that's quite important for arguing about the function
he hasn't taught us a lot
hmmm, how dare he not 
for reaaaal
Anyways, you can trust me on that one, as you see, I never make mistakes 
[the mean value theorem states that if you have a differentiable* function h on the interval [a,b], then there's some point c in (a, b) such that h'(c) = (h(b) - h(a))/(b - a)]
But besides, anyway, the fact is, we have [at least] one point c in between a and b where h'(c) = 0, and then we have that h''(c) < 0, so what can we say about the point x = c?
would c be a critical point, and it would be the absolute... minimum?
It would be a critical point yep, but it would be a maximum - the only one though, because we know that f' is always strictly decreasing, so that's the only point where it's zero



