Channel closed
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
1 messages · Page 141 of 1
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I struggle on drawing the tangent line of a point, would you have any tips, the question is asking to get the instantenous speed for 1/2 hour
use a ruler
and adjust it until it looks like the curve is just bouncing off it around the specified location
would this be wrong?
Yea
look how how your line is cutting the curve around that location
Bro is asking for help on how to draw a line
alright got it thanks @outer warren
@jolly prism Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @jolly prism
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do we resolve forces at perpendicualr and parallel
what do you mean at perpendicular and parallel?
@echo roost Has your question been resolved?
Resolve the forces in a manner where the 5g force is the hypotenuse, and extend the normal force down and you get your triangle
Using some basic angles, we can find that the top angle of the resultant triangle is also alpha
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am getting e^1/2 and e^-2 as the ans
that's right
@jolly dome Has your question been resolved?
but i tried entering it into the calci and it says its wrong
e^(-2) is wrong since ln(ln(x))=ln(-2) is undefined.
the other should be right
,w lim_(x to e^(1/2)) e^(2ln(ln(x)))-2+3ln(x)+ln^2(x)
it works
Closed by @jolly dome
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
chain rule
they just applied the chain rule to f(y) = y
-(a-b) = b-a
Figure out what they did
Closed by @peak yacht
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i dont really understand how the distance between P and L is |d + r cos theta|
if dist(F,L) = d then dist(F, L) = dist(P, F)(cos(theta)) + dist(P, L) ==> d = dist(P, F)(cos(theta)) + dist(P, L)
dist(P, F) = r then d = |r cos(theta)| + dist(P, L) ==> d - |r cos(theta)| = dist(P, L) ??
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I dont see why if a_(l+1) = 0 implies that f1 f2... fn are linearly dependent
@inland cargo Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @inland cargo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey
Can someone help me prove why this limit for a gradient is = 0
Python tells me as P approaches infinity, dz/dP = 0
!xy
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
,rccw
and you want the value of this gradient as p tends to infinity?
Yes
well the bottom has a p^2 term while the numerator has only p terms
maybe if you divide the numerator and denominator by p^2 you will see it more clearly
^
well the last term in the denominator should just be m
yeah, so you get 0/m which is 0
Why should it be m?
Could you show me proof?
mp^2/p^2 = m, no?
@steel oasis Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
its a curv integral with the vektor F(r) =(-y^3, -xy^2,z) with y(x)=x^alpha and r_a(0,0,0) and r_b(1,1,0)
@orchid flicker Has your question been resolved?
obviously not, who made this bot...
@orchid flicker Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
quick question
does a function only have a horizontal asymptote when x -> infinity?
When else do you think a function would have a horizontal asymptote
all i know is when the graph is infinite is when HA are used
but im just making sure
or is there any other way to get a HA?
Nope, if the domain of the function doesn't go all the way to infinity in at least one direction you can't get get a horizontal asymptote
@sullen pilot Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sullen pilot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If a|b and b|a, then why does a=+/-b
I'm still having trouble understanding this
how does that make it +/-b
1
or?
.close
Closed by @jade stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why does e^infinity = 0 in this case?
e^negative infinity is zero
Then have i done something wrong?
wym the whole function will be 5000
the work on the right is right
on the left idk what ur doing
y is there an extra e^infinity
suppost to be like this
the extra i just to tell that e^infinity is 0 but thats wrong i guess
because when u put the e in the denominator to make the exponent positive
u get infinity
but it’s in the denominator
so 1/infinity=0
yea
e^+infinity =infinity
e^-infinity=0
because e^-infinity=1/e^infinity=1/infinity=0
yeah thanks alot
👍🏻
.close
Closed by @vast night
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how or what property of division happened here?
as a matter of fact, what happened here?
some properties of division have been used, but I'm just confused how or what
от 7 | (10x + y) следва, че 7 | (10x + y - 7x)
момент, как?
защото 7x се дели на 7
а защо е -?
да
това тук ли е използвано?
мхм
не е сложна работа
ето ти още един начин да се докаже същото:
7 | (10x + y)
=> 7 | 5(10x + y)
=> 7 | (50x + 5y)
=> 7 | (50x - 49x + 5y - 7y)
=> 7 | (x - 2y)
ясно
а тук за използвали свойството b|(a+kb)
в дясно
за да извадят/прибавят достатъчни х и у
за да се получи х-2у
вдясно по-скоро са разложили по хитър начин 15x+5y
за да има кратни на 7, които можем да махнем
Closed by @jade stone
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
anyone know how to input log into the calculator
SHARP scientific calculator EL-510R
can we go over the question?
so we want to make = u log2(x) right?
u = log2(x)
sure, or you could take out 1/ln(2) as a constant before doing anything
right I ended up doing that when I did the u sub
because when I did the change of base formula I saw I could take it out
if I do it after the u sub will it make things wrong?
ok so u = log2(x)
log(x) / log2
1/log2 * log(x)
derivative of log(x) is 1/x
so we have 1/log2 * 1/x du/dx
we solve for dx
dx = log2 * x du
x cancles out in fraction
so we are left with u * log2
we integrate u to be u^2 / 2 * log2
so we get log2(x) / 2 * log2
that's the indefinite integral yep
so then we just go
but you forgot to square
yea the *log2
so it would turn into log2^2(x) / 2
so it would be log2^2(6) / 2 - log2^2(1) / 2
for the definite integral right?
yes
this is where I have problems
because I can't put it into my calculator
and wolfram alpha as well
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
so basically I will use ln every time on my calculator?
never use log?
,calc log_2(6)
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Undefined function log_2
Result:
2.5849625007212
should I never use log on my calculator?
,calc ln(6) / ln(2)
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Undefined function ln
ok so
well ln^2(2) means (ln(2))^2
its the same thing?
go back to when you resubstituted the expression for u
u^2 / 2 * log2 -> (log_2(x))^2 / 2 * log2
so clearly you take log_2(stuff) and then square it
what happened to u^2
and what about the log2?
on the outside?
yes
well go back to where it came from
just ln(2)?
it came from this
I know
so what do you think it should be
yes
I mean how do I calculate it
it was ln all along
when putting in calculator
also wolfram can do log-base
also when calculating the indefinite integrals
,w log_2(6)
do I have to do the subtraction all in one go in a lot of brackets
or can I do one piece and then do the second piece
or will there be rounding errors?
you mean definite?
there will
so will I get rounding error?
probably enough if you use Ans
just don't round multiple times
hahahahaha so I have to do the whole indefinitne calculation in like 20 brackets?
it's so hard to remember where the brackets are
yeah, it's an art
I wish they didn't want rounding decimals its so silly
should just leave it in fractions and move on
should probably do what you're asked
Im putting this into my calcultor
It's soooooooooooooo long
even when I do piece by piece
this is seriously silly
I guess I will just do it on paper first with the brackets
and then copy that exactly
ok Tushar
I got it all bracketed
and I'm going to attempt to put it in calculator
can you tell me if you get same answer?
2.32
@civic kite Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i know which z table i need to use to find k, ive looked at the answers and the first question uses a positive z table while the second uses a negative z table?
I'm not sure what your tables look like
We could use this for the first question though
yea im just not sure how im supposed to know which z table to use since they both use different ones
or how to actually get the answer tbf lmao
im reading that i need to do 1 - (z score) but not getting the answer its showing
figured out first question got -0.95 but unsure how to get the answer 0.18 for 3b <@&286206848099549185>
.close
Closed by @wicked elbow
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain Concavity to me. I know its when the second derivative is increasing or decreasing but I can't tell when that happens on a graph. People say to use smily faces as an example but that doesnt make sense to me.
It's when the second derivative is positive or negative, not increasing/decreasing
which means that it's when the first derivative (the slope of the graph) is increasing or decreasing
@modern geyser can you look at point A and tell whether the first derivative there is positive or negative?
@modern geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
At A its decreasing. I mispoke, I know its when the first derivative is increasing or decreasing but I cant see where that is on the graph
Yes, at A the first derivative is negative.
And look at this second point shortly after A, where I drew the second red line
See how the first derivative is positive there?
I do yeah
So clearly the first derivative increased from A to that other point
The slope increased, from a negative number, through zero, to something positive
producing a smiley-face shape between
but at the max between B and C the derivative is 0 so the first derivative is becoming negitive. so how can the slope be increasing and decreasing.
Between B and C, the slope is decreasing (which means the 2nd derivative is negative, and the graph is concave down)
It seems to start decreasing somewhere about halfway between A and B
so from the point between b and c and the point d is the first derivative getting more negtive if its going down or postive because its going towards 0.
From here to here?
yeah
At the top red point, the first derivative is 0.
After that, it immediately becomes negative, so the slope has decreased
but it looks like it starts increasing again just before D
See the blue smiles and the purple frown
ok I think I understand . I assumed both was happening at the same time. Thank you
Ahh, yeah, no, you've got both happening on this graph in different places
I see thanks a lot
Sure thing 👍
.close
Closed by @modern geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
structural engineering calculations i need help understanding the concept
<@&286206848099549185>
don't ping helpers without a question
i posted a question
????
what is there to answer
what do you mean
there is no question
this is not a question
if you're not gonna ask a question, don't waste a help channel
.close
Closed by @flat whale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
Csn u help with this
I subbed 2x as a
Idk what to do next
<@&286206848099549185>
???
Pls help
i think this leads to a quadratic equation, so solve with that in mind
just fix up the placements and you'll see it
yeah
So
How do i get more solutions tho
I only got 48.2 408.2 109.5 and 469
<@&286206848099549185>
Ok i have to go to bed
This is not solved though
@mental wigeon Has your question been resolved?
no u have to sub (cos2x) with a
dont forget the '2' there
so in this case it would be -1/3 = (cos2x) since u replaced (cos2x) with a
at least u should've, u forgot the 2 while calculating
@mental wigeon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i’m turning it into double integrals not iterated
i got 1/2 as answer i actually don’t see what’s wrong :((
iterated integrals work for some reason
getting 1/2 as an answer here?
,calc 0 * (1/2)
Result:
0
You found the first integral as 1/2, the second one as 0
oh didn't see you writing this, thought you were asking why I meant what I said 
There's me not reading 
no worries at all
(but it happens to us all
)
Always a pleasure 
.close
Closed by @sleek flame
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do you know the formula for the sum of cubes (non alternating) ?
all good
^
why?
To get the sum of cubes up to k-1
but thats not what you want
an idea would be to sum the cubes (even an odd) and remove 2 times the even cubes
Wdym
1^3 - 2^3 + 3^3 - 4^3 + 5^3 - ... = 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + 4^3 + 5^3 + ... - 2(2^3 + 4^3 + ...)
does that make sense
Ohh i see
so there is k-1 even numbers
Then should i sub in n=2k-1
so you sum the first 2k-1 cubes and remove the even cubes (you still have some work to do for the even cibes)
yes
What about the k-1
the even cubes?
Yes
notice that 1^3 - 2^3 + 3^3 - 4^3 + 5^3 - ... = 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + 4^3 + 5^3 + ... - 2(2^3 + 4^3 + ...) = 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + 4^3 + 5^3 + ... - 16(1^3 + 2^3 + ...)
How?
1^3 - 2^3 + 3^3 - 4^3 + 5^3 - ... = 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + 4^3 + 5^3 + ... - 2(2^3 + 4^3 + ...) = 1^3 + 2^3 + 3^3 + 4^3 + 5^3 + ... - 16(1^3 + 2^3 + ...)
does that make sense?
no
you have to use the formula again
for the even cubes
2(2^3 + 4^3 + ...) = 16(1^3 + 2^3 + ...) = ? (use the formula)
(how many even cubes are there?)
almost
((2k-1)(2k)/2))^2-16((k-1)(k)/2))^2
because you removed them twice and factored out 2^3
I will do that part
you should get 4k^3 - 3k^2
Thank u very much
youre welcome
@ashen haven Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
71 where do I even start 💀💀
normally when you have really a weird function in an integral you want to try a u-substitution of some sort
@hard crest Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hard crest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone check my answer?
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
@fair prawn Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @fair prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
e^x=x+5
stuff of that form generally can't be solved exactly (unless you use special functions like the lambert-w function), but you can calculate them numerically
@west berry Has your question been resolved?
What is that thing
And where I can learn that
do you just need a number for x
No I want to learn lamber w functions
it's a part of complex analysis, which I don't do, so you'll have to ask someone else
I was doing just basic calculas
Why the hell they give complex analysis thing on that
Bruh man I am screwed
what's the original question
Like it says 2 function
e^x
And another one is x+5
So they want the area bounded by those two curves
So I just try to solve for x so I can have the limits
can you send a screenshot of the problem if possible
Numerically means
calculate the intersection points using approximation methods
newton raphson, etc.
or just plugging numbers into your calculator until you get something close
fwiw, the values are x=-4.99322 and x=1.93685 (approximately)
Closed by @west berry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Idk how to get c)
@hot mica Has your question been resolved?
,rotate
Which is 6 6
ok, then you want to find the distance from the midpoint to a vertex
yeah
@hot mica Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what should i do next?
it doesnt seem i can solve this integral
also can someone explain when i shouldn't use this integrating factor method?
because there are some differential equatation that it's supposedly impossible to find the integrating factor for
but i can't imagine one of them
So you chose to substitute u = arctan(x) right? How did you get the du from there?
@obsidian bison
yes
wrong sub
i was able to solve it
but does this method works for any first order linear differential equations?
@dull bear
Well at least in theory it should, though there may be cases where you don't get a nice integral out of it 
@obsidian bison Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
looks good
This is an example I was given
looks good
Oh thank you !
With b) how do I know what indices is correct for the factor number ?
I know it's 4 but is it 4^x2 ? And why would it be 2 ? Apologies I'm not sure on how to word it
6
nice
first factor found
next is the numbers
if theyre even numbers u can take a factor of 2 out
its just a trial n error until u can find the common factor
U dont need to pay that much attention as you will factor out positive factors
so the indices won't change a bit
But if you were to factor out a negative factor
It would reverse the indices : - - +
Do u get the hang of it?
I think I understand a little
Gl i suck at helping but aight
Most people would use positive indice as the factor number
Haha no I think you helped ! I essentially need an indices there so I have x2 and just subtract that. That's what I have on my examples
but negative works the same and essentially correct too, although the teacher prolly wont accept it
Ah see I didnt get told that
I was going by highest factor number
Like these are a few we did
Ha yeah it was a quick power point and I've never done any algebra before.
Gonna take me awhile for this 😂
@willow whale Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @willow whale
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi i dont understand why there the denominator for c is squared. can someone explain please? thanks
this is what you do when you have a repeated factor in the denom
you include fractions with denominators equal to powers of that factor, up to the power that appears in the original
so e.g. if the demon were (x-2)(x-1)^3 you'd have B/(x-1) + C/(x-1)^2 + D/(x-1)^3
but is there a reason why we need to do this?
well imagine a simple case
(5x+7)/x^2
you would not be able to express this with only A/x or only A/x^2
you have to write before (x-1) and then (x-1)^2 , if it was (x-1)^3 you have to write first (x-1) then (x-1)^2 and then (x-1)^3
i said exactly this above
yes ive seen
but how is this related to having to writting the demoninators in all powers?
mmmh
not sure i can give a convincing explanation beyond this lol
you'd have to go look for a proof of PFDs in the general case
Closed by @marble kettle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this right
Looks good, but remember to keep the plus sign in between y^2(x-2) and (x-2)(x-5).
Closed by @winged vapor
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey
i got a study guide review can someone give me the answers?
i just need to double check
w another sheet
no, we don't do that here.
if you have issues with specific problems
post them (ideally one at a time), show what you tried and the concerns you have.
@storm owl Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I was wondering how I could get up to learning complex analysis, I have been self studying single variable calculus for about a year now, though I still am not sure if I know everything yet, I was also wondering what resources are good for getting there and how long it would take. I haven't taken linear algebra either.
have you tried reading an introductory complex analysis text?
Not yet, and I should probably learn multivariable calculus before that, right?
not necessarily, you don't need much multivariable calculus
Well, is there any part of multivariable calculus that may be required or that I would benefit from?
understand the basic ideas of vectors and partial derivatives
it's useful if you know what differentiability of a function of two variables means
maybe green's theorem if the book decides to use that as a launching point for proving the basic theorems
Is there any other prerequires of complex analysis, like should I do real analysis first or-?
you don't necessarily need a full real analysis course, but it depends on the emphasis of the complex course
definitely good to be comfortable with concepts like convergence, continuity, differentiability, power series, open and closed sets in the plane
oh and line integrals
Okay, where do you suggest I learn these?
some intro textbooks will teach you what you need as you go
brown and churchill for example has quite modest requisites
Okay, great!
you could always try reading a book like that and if you find something you need background on, go and learn that in a targeted way
that would be more efficient than doing a full multivariable calculus and/or real analysis course first
how long do you think a full multivariable calculus / or real analysis course would take btw
for self-study?
Yeah.
well for example, mit has a good multivariable course on youtube
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL4C4C8A7D06566F38
36 lectures, about 50 minutes each
Yeah, I was thinking about taking 18.02SC
along with their real and complex analysis courses
and 18.06SC for linear algebra
what are these 16.02sc, 16.06sc, looks like MIT-style numbering but aren't their math courses all 18.xx?
ah got it
yea i can't vouch for all of them, but i've watched many of the multivariable ones at the playlist above (18.02), they're very good
i think they have accompanying problems/exams/solutions somewhere as well
haven't looked at those though
Good to hear, I would expect that the school that hosts integration bees would do well at teaching calculus haha
yea that lecturer (denis auroux) is really good, explains things very well
Would you say it is comprehensive?
and i assume gilbert strang for linear algebra, he's good too
yea, as far as i can tell it's a complete coverage of all the standard topics for multivariable calculus
Haha, I find that funny since my schooling has longer classes everyday and still if you watch one video a day in theory you could learn it faster than school can teach in one semester, or even half of one.
does your school spend time going over a lot of example problems? that could explain why they take longer
the mit guy does a few but he expects you get most of your practice doing homework on your own
Honestly yeah, most of the time is dedicated to example problems, still, seems understanding is poor in my class.
Then again I am in the lowest level math class in my high school
might be good to supplement with online lectures, maybe your teacher is just doing a poor job of explaining
or, sometimes it just takes some time to wrap your brain around new knowledge
I already am fairly fluent in all of algebra 1 and some of 2
So it doesn’t affect me much, but a lot of my class is struggling.
I actually have a math final today, though I’ll do good even though I don’t study for that level of mathematics
Though I do want to take all of my school’s math classes over the summer on a charter school to show my school I can actually do math or something
.close
Closed by @unique lagoon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does it mean when it says contradicts the minimality of q, is that saying q is not the smallest such denominator
yes
Closed by @sleek flame
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if z be a complex number satisfyng |Re(z)| + |Im(z)| = 4, then find range of |z|
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
can someone pls help me with thiis question
and my previous one
they are both different questions
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
uhm
but its been an hour and. a half since i asked my prev one and noone responded so i thot its not unfair to ask a new question
correct
but idk what to do after that
where is the value of x^2+y^2 maximum?
idk
is it a circle inscribed in the square
and max is circle circumscribng the squre
am i right
.close
Closed by @hoary cypress
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
helo
i have to calculate local extrema of it
and
i calculated partial derivatives:
and i know max is probably 4 and min is 0 but how can i get that
but to make hessian matrix i need critical points
and idk how to get these
i can only get tan(x)=tan(y)
set both equations equal to 0
@dusty kiln Has your question been resolved?
hi im new and i have a question so when a twine has a strength of 4 tex, which means 1 km of this thread weighs 4 grams. Calculate the diameter of the thread in mm if the material density is 1.44 g / 2 square centimeters?
@dusty kiln Has your question been resolved?
Maybe you can use the difference formula of the sine if you factor 2
what formula
sin(x-y)=sin(x)cos(y)-sin(y)cos(x)
The first equation should be 2 sin(y-x)=0 and the second 2 sin(x-y)=0, since sin(y-x)=-sin(x-y), your critical points are the points (x,y) such that x-y=k*pi, with k an integer
Did you find the hessian? Because if you have done that, the rest is easy!
i dont think the hessian works here
bcus det will be 0
but i put the numbers in function
and got 4 and 0 so i guess i just need to prove that its max andmin for that function and that makes sense
It works:
The hessian is:
\begin{equation}
H_f=\begin{pmatrix}
-2\cos(x-y) & 2\cos(x-y)\
2\cos(x-y) & -2\cos(x-y)\
\end{pmatrix}
\end{equation}
cristorenzo99
Do you know what a positive or negative matrix is?
im not sure
i know that if the determinant is 0, i can say is it max/min or not
i cant *
Try to sub x-y=k pi and cos(k pi)=(-1)^k
So you have two hessian matrices, one is {-2,2;2,-2} and the other is {2,-2;-2;2}
Strange
Maybe I have an idea
If you expand the squares, use cos^2 x+ sin^2 x=1, and use the difference formula for the cosine (cos(x-y)=cos(x)cos(y)+sin(x)sin(y)) you should get 2+2*cos(x-y)
And maybe it's easier because, if you set t=x-y, you get 2+2cos(t). Now you know that the cosine is minimum at kpi, with k odd and maximum at kpi, with k even
yeaah soit will be enaugh to prove that its max and min ?
I think it will, the points x-y=k pi with k odd are minimum points and the points where x-y=k pi, with k even, are maximum points.
Closed by @dusty kiln
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
k linearly independent vectors in a vector space V span a k dimensional subspace of V, by definition of them being a basis of it
If k=n, the only n-dimensional subspace of R^n is R^n, so they must span R^n.
Bases are the fundamental idea behind dimension.
In a way, they are stricter than spanning sets since all bases are spanning, but not all spanning subsets are bases
I can understand intuitively in R^2 if we have the two unit vectors: (0,1) and (1,0) how they span the entire x-y plane through linear combinations of them. But what if we have two linearly independent vectors like (3,4) and (7,9)? How can we intuitively know that it spans the whole plane?
linearly independent means they point in "different directions"
which is all you need to span the plane
which works well for 2 vectors
But for > 2 vectors, this can be misinterpreted
you can go everywhere if you can go in two different directions
they're 2 linearly independent vectors since one isn't a multiple of the other => they span a 2D space, but R² is 2D => they span R²
Or find the formula explicitly by solving the system
Oh I forgot the "intuitively" part
This may not be super intuitive
Regarding your last point. just so I understand. If we have 3 vectors: (1,0), (3,0), and (2,2). the set of vectors (1,0) and (2,2) are a basis and a span of R^2. The set (1,0) and (2,0) span R and they are not a basis because not linearly independent?
yes
they dont span R
though they span R x {0} technically, not R
they span a subset of R^2 which looks like R
they span a 1-D space, isomorphic to R (you'll see what that means later)
What is the difference between R and spanning "R^2 which looks like R" / "R x {0}"?
Wait, sorry why is (1,0) not in R?
well is (1,0) a real number?
the set Rx{0} is {(x,0): x in R}
(see cartesian product)
is there a case where 2 linearly independent vectors don't span R^2? I still don't really get intuitively why just because 2 vectors point in different direction/linearly independent they span the whole R^2space?
n=2
since they're 2 lin-indep vectors, they span a 2-D space, by definition right
What are the 2D subspaces of R² ?
Just so I understand, that's equivalent to the set of coordinates where x ranges from -inf to inf, but the only value y can take on is 0, and because it's a coordinate, it exists as a subset of R^2?
well if we wanna be technical, (1,0,0) and (0,1,0) are two linearly independent vectors which dont span R^2
yeah
also known as the x-axis
what's a subspace? I assume it's the whole x-y plane?
a subset that is also a vector space
a subspace of V is a subset of V that is a vector space
(with the same operations on it)
(over the same field)
(implied by the scalar multiplication being the same operation)
Ok, so is the subspace of R^2 just a plane?
the only 2d subspace of R^2 is R^2 itself
aka the plane, yes
there are a lot of 1d subspaces. all the lines going through the origin
{0} is also a subspace
Ok so maybe, I just can't get pass the by definition part. I might just fail to see intuitively why it's by definition that any 2 linearly independent vectors span a 2-D space
I can see it intuitively for some like the unit vectors, but why is it true for all of them
2 dimensions by definition means "spanned by 2 linearly independent vectors"
Hmm I see
Is there a way to reduce any two linearly independent vectors into (0,1) and (1,0)? I feel like if that's possible, it would make sense to me
well what do you mean by "reduce"
for some more intuition. if you have your two linearly independent vectors, that means you can travel on the lines spanned by those
first you can go along the first line
and then you can go parallel to the second line
and because they point in different directions, you really can go everywhere you want to
I think 3b1b has a nice animation for that somewhere in his videos
everyone should watch the whole playlist anyways
4 years later, it's still fundamentally stuck in my mind, it's still how I see things
They're just not quite pink and blue
or green and red
but they move all the same
Wait, linear combination doesn't not need to be scalar multiples right?
Like a*(v1,v2) + b*(v3, v4), a and b can take on any rational value?
well some scalar multiple of the first plus some scalar multiple of the second
any real value
just like for (1,0) and (0,1)
ohhhh, that makes a lot of sense now. So we can take infinitesimally small distances in either direction, to span the entire plane
Ok thank you for the help!
.close
Closed by @hazy trout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If you have a closed hydraulic system with two pistons at the same elevation. Pressure stays the same for both pistons? So would applying 1kN of force on a smaller piston apply 10kN of force on a piston with 10 times the area?
@zealous cradle Has your question been resolved?
@zealous cradle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not reallly sure about this, you started in the right direction, but after that i dont really understand what you were trying to do
I think if you put = sign between them then it would be much more readable
I checked the answer in "Symbolab" and it said the answer is correct, however it doesn't work when submitted for the assignment.
Yes the exponent of the whole equation is -3
Okay thanks Gabe
@warm vale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I solve 3-5?
Ok I got 1 and 2, 1 has a real solution so it’s true and 2 doesn’t so it’s false
stuck on 3-5 :(
<@&286206848099549185>
o hello
The question is asking if for all real x, if $x^2 > 4$, then is $x > 2$
Dork9399
x>+-2
Is that the same as x > 2?
Yes
Assume that y is just a constant, and try to solve for x (in terms of y)
so i turn it into y=
no x =
oh
ok
i got
x = 1/ (y^2 + 1)
so i try to find a counterexample where x is real but theres no real y?
or is it the other way around
Can you manipulate the right hand side to make any real value?
wdym, is it not already?
Just take x to be a real value, and try to find some y that will satisfy
Remember that reals arent just positive integers
they can be irrational
negative
or both
Ok
ok it works for x=1 and y=1
nvm
it doesnt lol
it works for x=1/2 and y=1