#help-17
1 messages ¡ Page 133 of 1
Closed by @upbeat maple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
consider: $$ \frac1{a(a+1)} = \frac1a - \frac1{(a+1)} $$
rysrobrgldvoelrđťep>vneae=u
you donât need that for this one
only this, and then expand it out and cancel infinitely many things
Yes
Not all
Thereâs 1
No
so, can you find the answer?
it means
something like this:
$$ \frac11 - \frac12 + \frac13 - \frac14 + \frac15 - \frac16 + \cdots $$
rysrobrgldvoelrđťep>vneae=u
where you can rearrange the terms, and then get out a different result
Here, this is from Wikipedia
A series is conditionally convergent when you can rearrange its terms to get a different sum
The picture I sent shows how this can be done
I don't know if I'm allowed to input, and apologies if I missed this somewhere, but wouldn't it be easier to structure it as a power series and evaluate the solution using series tests to determine what it meets?
Oh nvm I see you were explaining telescoping
There is no reason to structure it as a power series, itâs already telescoped
Youâre always allowed to input
So based on the telescoping wouldn't it have a defined sum and be convergent?
And wouldn't conditionally convergent mean that in one kind of test it's confirmed to converge but in another it diverges
They were asking about what conditionally convergent means
Oooh okay
I took that to be a question they had after they solved the problem
What did you read it as
you may have seen a definition like âconditional convergence means that if you take the absolute value of all the terms and add them up, then the result divergesâ
turns out, these two are equivalent
a series which is convergent, but whose absolute value series is divergent, can always be rearranged to give any value you want
and vice versa
No, (1/2)log 2 is different from this problem that you sent
It was just an example
Itâs a multiple choice question, I donât think youâll need to show it
This series is absolutely convergent for x = 1
not conditionally convergent
so d is not the correct answer
because its absolute value series doesnât diverge
If you like, but there is no need to, because all terms are positive
Since this question was just going off telescoping, and telescoping is always convergent to a sum you shouldn't need to worry about it being conditionally convergent
If say you were working with something that relied on the alternating series test, then you would have to check for that conditional or absolute convergence
at first, there was no negative sign

Closed by @upbeat maple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello guys, not sure if i'm being dumb
but i wasn't even to justify one quantity is bigger than the other


have you tried playing with some specific numbers?
yeah i think r is bigger by testing some numbers, but is there an algebraic way of showing this?
also n = 0 they're equal right i'm confused lol
ok here is something to think about
for large n, no matter what U and G are, (U+n)/(U+G+2n) is going to about n/(2n) = 1/2
oh yeah just limits stuff
and U/(U+G) can be less than 1/2 or greater than 1/2 depending on U and G
so that's enough for me
Real kanna helping fake kanna 
i'm fake because i suck at mathsmh
but the relationship can't be determined then right?
yep
i think the answer is r is always bigger
iirc
or p is always bigger
it's one of those

okay wait i think i see
it says "club had more undergraduate students than undergraduate students" so i guess P < 1/2, right?
and n asymptomatically approaches 1/2 in the limit
for large n
so b?
ah
yes i overlooked that
btw idk if it's english/math anymore but đ can n be 0?
it does say "n more" but they've been messing with me before and taking conditions where n = 0 and stuff
Two kannas?
@brisk moss is the real kanna
Two kannas?
@wide sundial Has your question been resolved?
so it looks this isn't necessary: what happens is U/(U+G) is less than 1/2 and (U+1)/(U+G+2) > U/(U+G)
and picking larger n's can be viewed as repeated (U+1)/(U+G+2) > U/(U+G)
wait why did you pick different n's
aren't they supposed to be the same n's
unless the rationale is different than what i'm understanding
well what i'm saying is (U+1)/(U+G+2) > U/(U+G) is true for any positive integers U,G with G > U
and that also gives us (U+2)/(U+G+4) > (U+1)/(U+G+2)
and so on
owhh that's interesting
so (U+n)/(U+G+2n) > U/(U+G) for any U,G,n
wait so this is equivalent to showing that:
x/y < (x+t)/(y + v)
for positive x,y,t, and v(?)
we shouldn't need 4 variables
just (U+1)/(U+G+2) > U/(U+G)
and we can write G = U + x with x a positive integer or smth
to maybe encode the G > U condition nicely
but still 2 variables
unnecessary
for that we can't show for smaller values of n though, right?

fake snow walking around sullying us
.close
Closed by @wide sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
pls help me with this
AD and AC are the diameters.
they split their respective circles into semi-circles. correct?
not, you know the property. the angle projected by the ends of diameter, on any other point on the semicircle/circle is 90deg
so, angle ABD is 90
and so is ABC
now, if ABD is 90, and ABC is also 90, they sum up to be 180.
this is the case for a straight line
thus DBC is a straight line.
and B lies on the line segment DC
@cedar ingot Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cedar ingot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
thx
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ItzKraken
What's the answer
idk
these q are pain in a**
Agreed
i know that
what is this equal to?
a lot of times wht i end up proving
x+y+z+w
is 0=0
Looks like you can use linear algebra to solve this
btw after this i do wanna know if theres a general algorithm for this
I am trying to write every variable in terms of w
gaussian elimination?
Put all the variables one side
btw me is guessing this is also thru LA
There is one
and do what?
I think it is
then eliminate x from all equations but one
Iâll demonstrate 15 min later
oh okay đ lemme try till then
i got 3 equations in total so u want me to eliminate from 2 correct?
should be
aight
These are my workings
all I did was eliminate w from 2 equations, and then eliminate z in one of those
then get everything in terms of x
so x + y + z + w is now all in terms of x
well i got it in terms of w (another free variable) the problem is the answer has to be an exact number
consider the coefficients
they all cancel out
get equations for any three variables, and then use cramers method
no need to use cramer
my answer was 5
how tho..?
what
,rotate
Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.
,rcw
sup kraken
I completed my working at the bottom
oh in ur work the x cancel out
ah in mines they didnt
must've messed up somewhere then
I think this algorithm is called gaussian elimination
yeah thats what u did
U write the coefficients as a matrix
then draw a bar
then the RHS's respectively
and then u eliminate the variables 1 by 1
yep
đ
let me show it
$I\ \to\ 6x+3y-z-w=9\ $\$II\ \to\ 3x-8y-10z-8w=16$\$III\ \to\ 4x-3y-6z-5w=10$\$I+II-2\left(III\right)$\$6x+3y-z-w+3x-8y-10z-8w-2\left(4x-3y-6z-5w\right)=9+16-2\left(10\right)$\$x+y+z+w=5$
B-eard
I just noticed the coefficients and tried to form a relation
Well elimination stuff that rysrobrgldvoelr talked about is quite lengthy
and going for a sort of calculated guess is a better bet
how does a person even begin to notice that (1 + 2 - 2(3))
hmm well I kinda feel ashamed for not noticing this
the advantage is that you can start doing it as soon as you see the question
yeah I must agree on that
But I'm not a fan of writing much so I'd kind of always prefer tricks (if any)
sometimes thereâs no quick trick
yeah
its like uhh a failsafe if u cant notice the correct thing quickly or are just too bad at it then use it
right?
It is some sort of an olympiad question?
finally Iâm able to solve the problem in a green name channel
uh..frosst
yeah we had a 10 question exam in school with olympiad questions this was the only one i skipped
eh? hes solved somethin for frosst before?
NO
what NO
Like the kind of problems he posts
oh yeah those are always a headache
i tend to post extremely easy questions imo
I'd feel so great about myself if I am even able to read it completely
lollllll
i tried one of them before it was some algebra+calc question with summations I ended up wasting 2 hours đ
in the end, snow-sama helped frosst
the solution was obviously beyond my knowledge
well tyvm both of you
.close
Closed by @sudden compass
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi guys, dumb question but i was trying to find the range of x + 1/x
and i saw this person doing it in a unique way without inverses
i donât understand the f(x) = ⌠part

do you know what the rearrange inequality is?
yes it is a thing
In mathematics, the rearrangement inequality states that for every choice of real numbers
and every permutation
Ď
{\displaystyle \sigma }
of the numbers
1
,
2
,
âŚ
n
{\displaystyle 1,2,\ldots n}
we have
Informally, this ...
i still donât get it in first glance
okay i think i see lol
this is a weird thing
never knew math worked like that where u can have inequality relations by shuffling stuffs

.close
Closed by @wide sundial
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I had to prove that a set is a vector space(over a field,ofc),can i avoid proving the 8 axioms by just proving itâs a vector subspace?
Please pin me ,if u respond
if it is a subset of something that you already know is a vector space, then yes
@visual frost
So,when canât I apply this?
Whatâs an instance of having to prove a set is a vector space by those 10 axioms?
well for example F^n or the space of all functions
So why couldnât I prove itâs a vector space by proving itâs a subspace of itself?
because then you never prove all the other axioms like associativity etc
the only reason you can leave them out when proving subspaces is that you already have proved before that they hold in the big space
But if i had F^2 ,this wouldnât be the case,correct?
it needs to satisfy all axioms of a vector space
you would still need to show it for F^2
you must prove all the vector space axioms. If you're proving that a set is a subspace, you still need to show that it satisfies these axioms, as the subspace itself must be a vector space
So when donât I have to use all those axioms,when i have a given vector space,of which another subset would be its consequent subspace?
Well,yeah,but by proving itâs a vector subspace i would implicitly arrive to the conclusion that itâs a vector space
you can only prove that something is a subspace if it is a subset of something you already know to be a vector space
How to show that [insert any possible set] is a vector space fallacy :
- Step 1 : show that it's a subset of itself
- Step 2 : it is indeed stable by any operations you want
- Step 3 : profit
@visual frost Has your question been resolved?
So,this should be given in the exercise,right?
In order to use this proof
Yeah,it doesnât sound right to me either
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
and then one tails. Give the beta distribution that describes this. Use
integration to determine the probability that the true rate of flipping
heads is between 0.4 and 0.6, reflecting that the coin is reasonably fair.```
@tepid basin Has your question been resolved?
!show
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
?
I think this is the solution! But I don't know how right I am.
.close
Closed by @tepid basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So the answer key says unbounded for the equation
but desmos says otherwise
the limit actually seems to be (x -4)?
can someone explain which one is correct?
x-4 is unbounded at infinity,
The limit at infinity does not directly tell you about affine asymptotes.
It just asks what the function approaches, and if the function just increases then it's unbounded.
so, although a slant asymptote might sound like it's bounded, it's actually unbounded?
Yeah. All a slanted asymptote tells you is that your function looks like a line for large values of x.
But in any case I think it'll be unbounded.
Because if it approaches a line, that line has to go to -infinity or +infinity
ah actually that makes sense 
i wasn't too familar with the definition 'unbounded' but now i seem to understand better
thank you
No problem!
.close
Closed by @still dune
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Not sure what I have to do here, it's obvious 1/a+1/b=1/2 , but how do I find the line equation from that
Just a hint please
I also got ab=2a+2b
but I don't suppose that helps too much
nvm , just realised a=2b/(b-2)
uhm
that solves it I think
where a,b are the x and y interecepts
hi @scenic ravine do you want a hint
yeah, am I on thr right track?
hmmm
finding a relationship between a and b should enable me to find the line equation , right?
why not use y=mx plus b
because they have said the reciprocal of the mean of the intercepts is 1/4
so I'm using x/a + y/b=1
calculate the slope with y2-y1 into x2-x1
then you have the y intercept
then you can subsittute
m = (2 - 1) / (2 - 1) = 1/1 = 1.
1 = 1(1) + b
1 = 1 + b
b = 0.
where did you get the 2 from?
the answer is B
its 1,1 2,2
For stone C (4,4):
4 = 4(4) -> 4 = 4. So stone C is on the path of the man.
the answer key says D though, guess it;s wrong then
thanks
no i am wrong i read the question wrong so sorry mb
<@&286206848099549185> , could I have a hint please
I'm stuck with $\frac{1}{a} +\frac{1}{b}= 1/2$
Why am. I here
add it
add what?
this is your question right ?
yeah 2ab=a+b is what I get, how does that help?
no wait you have done something wrong
I also know $\frac{x}{a} +\frac{y}{b}=1$ but I don't suppose that helps too much
Why am. I here
what?
Here is how to add it:
⢠Cross-multiply 1 and b
⢠Cross-multiply 1 and a
⢠Add the two products together, which we get a+b as our numerator
⢠Multiply the two previoud denominators, which we get ab
Build our fraction with the parts we have, and we get a+b/ab
Oops typo
And like the problem said, The arithmetic mean of the reciprocals of the intercepts of the line on the coordinate axes is 1/4
That's the start that i forgor to add hihi
its 1 upon a plus 1 upon b upon 2 equals to 1 upon 4
that becames 1 /a plus 1/b which is 1/2
and you get one more equation
can i sedn you a phot @scenic ravine of my solving
just send it in this chat, If you don't mind
huh, but aren't h and k unknowns too?
wait there isanother way this is too direct
take the line as y equals to mx plus c
so the x intercept now is -c/m
and y intercept is c
add the intercepts while dividing by 2 equals is 1 upon 4
-m/c plus 1/c the whole divided by 2 is 1/4
2(1-m)=c
so now the y=mx plus 2 (1-m)=c you will get (y-2)-m(x-2) so it is 2,2
Just looked at the solution . How's this obvious?
look at my sol above its diffrent yet ssame
hmm, OK. Thanks
do you understand ??
Got it, thanks!
@scenic ravine Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @scenic ravine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help with this please
I've done this so far but I'm stuck now
@quaint breach Has your question been resolved?
@quaint breach Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @quaint breach
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so i am studying in class 10 icse so in geometry which i find very tough so how to know how to do construction because then we can randomly do anything and do prove anything but if we do that it becomes wrong
so i am studying in class 10 icse so in geometry which i find very tough so how to know how to do construction because then we can randomly do anything and do prove anything but if we do that it becomes wrong
...
sed life
don t spam
ok then
ok
About why construction is being done
ok
@hasty tiger Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this accurate?
Samuel
Check if it's correctly translated, I'm not sure I understood your writting.
Closed by @fast geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i tried to first iintegrate on z
which results to (5x+6y)/7
if im not wrong
but then im not sure how to continue
it looks like i should use polar coordinates
hi
@pale wagon Has your question been resolved?
@pale wagon Has your question been resolved?
I also fell it's a bit wierd there is no pi.
I believe the x-part integrates to 0, but the y part should be positive I belive.
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so im writing quadratic equations for this project and i would like for them to be cooler, and be kinda bumpy
Why means?
Ok so like hmm
say between x = 20 and x=40 i would like for there to be a temporary increase in value before going back down to the rest of the line
or what if i wanted to write more complex lines then this
how do i do it
to the rest of the line you mean the rest oft he parabola?
so u donât want it to be a quadratic?
Could you draw in MS paint what you want exactly?
this is more what i was looking for
parabolas can only have one extrema
so
my maths education stopped at algebra 1
quadratic equations last thing i learned in school
i do calculus but only in computer words
ok so you want more than 1 "bump"
what is another school of maths to allow me to make whacky graphs
yes i dont wanna be quadratic anymore
is this somethng you want
yeah something like that
i would like to no longer be quadratic
yea itâs not a quadratic
^
i think im gonna need khan academy for this
a type of vegitable unless its squared then its the inverse square of a number
in terms of polynomials
not like square roto
like what is a root of a polynomial
polynomials is when the depression happened
so i think i need to learn polynomials on khan
đ
not quite more like the zeros of the function or where the function crosses the x axis
so, polynomials will allow me to create more interesting and multi-variable graphs that don't just change the amplitude, phase, and angle of the function
then i can put a new function there
well polynomial functions in this case arenât multi variable
and connect it to a new curve
amplitude and phase are words that describe periodic functions
not polynomials
btw
the only math i learned by myself is trig
r u learning math in school?
no
r u homeschooled?
im a software engineer who suddenly needed math
oh
i was neglected as a child and dropped out
sorry to hear that
seems like u have done well for urself if ur a software engineer
iâd watch videos on khan academy or organic chemistry tutor
or u can buy some algebra books
unfortunate
ahead of most
anyway, Its more that, i've gotten far inspite of the fact i don't know math
so polynomials are what im looking for
not quadratic equations
Closed by @vestal fractal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How would i prove this result. Note we have collection of centered random variables X1, ..., Xm such that E[Xi] = 0 for all i = 1 to m taking values in [a, b] in R, and XBar is the maxi Xi
I don't really know how the problem will shake out when you actually do it, but I assume you apply Jensen's Inequality and that hint, then it should just all naturally fall into place without much grief
Did you try out Hoeffding's lemma with $\bar{X}$ instead of $X$?
OneTrackPony
trying it right now, one sec let me see what i get
so i would get e^-lE(XBar) * E(e^lXBar) <= e ^hoeffdings_quantity above
so i can take log and multiply by 1/l
so i get log E(e^l*XBar) <= E(XBar) + l * (b-a)^2 / 8 where l is lambda
so i guess i gotta find an upper bound for E(XBar) which is of the form 1/l * log(m) for some m? @remote arch
@eager moon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi
is this correct
,rccw
f(x) is not cos(e^x), i am pretty sure...
also this says "calculator active problem"
you are supposed to use a calculator
like the kind that can do integration
integral of sin(e^x) 
oh itâs negative yea?
i prefer paper
you cannot do this on paper
you do it out n then put it into a calculator
Integrate from 0 to 2 then use FTC
a closed form doesn't exist for this in terms of elementary functions which is why you have to evaluate it numerically
Runge Kutta or WA
@cerulean isle Has your question been resolved?
huh
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm looking at eigenvectors and I'm confused how alpha= root(3)/3
I don't get why it isn't 3/root(3)
It's just the normalisation part
I can see it comes from root(1+1+1)/(1+1+1)
But I don't understand how to get to it
3/root(3) is already greater than 1. How can that be the normalization constant?
how do we get to root(3)/3?
Why can't it be greater than 1?
You're just finding the length of the vector [1,1,1]
Because the magnitude is 1
The magnitude of x1 is 1
You want alpha to be a constant such that your eigenvector has unit length
To normalize a vector, you divide each component by the magnitude. The way the answer key wrote it was it factored out the magnitude and rationalize
Ohh, so why wouldn't it just be 1/root3 ?
Do it just rationalised 1/root 3 in teh answer
That's what root(3)/3 is. Either is fine
Yes
Closed by @open mist
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
?
probably best to not immediately spam your channel with stickers then
Ok
read this, post ur q, wait for help
Closed by @stuck girder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please explain this?
Closed by @tepid basin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Please help
As a helper, please do not give out answers that could be copied as a homework solution. Have the student work through the problem themselves and guide them along the way.
Someone else is already using this help channel. If you need help with a question, please open your own help channel/thread (see #âhow-to-get-help for instructions).
Can you explain
Do you know Euclid's division lemma
No
Quotient*Divisor = dividend + remainder
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I check when a function is injective?
Lets say I have 2+sin(3x)
when the implication [
\m f{x_1} = \m f{x_2} \Implies x_1 = x_2
]
is satisfied for all $x_1, x_2$ in the domain of $f$
easiest way is to find a counterexample to the above implication
say sin(0) = sin(pi) (I'm ignoring the constants because they won't change the result)
just a random example
degrees 
made it radians lmfao
but 0 is not equal to pi so the implication is obviously false
yes okay sin0 and sin pi are the same
yes but 0 and pi are not
right
Actually, let me give another example, because sin is indeed a bad one
$y=\frac{e^x-5}{e^x+1}$
rainy
simplify this and see if you get x_1 = x_2
Okay and what does that tell me?
that shows this implication
meaning it is injective
well over the entirety of its domain of course...
rainy
rainy
$x_1 = x_2, x_1 \neq -5, x_2 \neq -5$
rainy
yes
you dont have to write x_1, x_2 not equal to -5
because you already defined your domain not to include -5
so
sometimes the contrapositive of this implication might be easier to prove
[
x_1 \ne x_2 \Implies \m f{x_1} \ne \m f{x_2}
]
so consider what would be most fitting in your problems
@tulip sleet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @tulip sleet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is square root zero real?
$\sqrt{0}$?
ÎŁÎC
yeye
That is just 0
So if i have $\sqrt{x+5}$ can the domain of f(x) be 5?
Odie
include 5*
yes
Ah oke thanks
you mean x-5?
You mean -5
Closed by @bleak prawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
And congrats on becoming mod haha
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Let K be a field and n â N. Provide a basis for HomK(K^n, K^n). Proof!
Hint: Represent each F â HomK(K^n, K^n) as a matrix, and consider a suitable basis of K^nĂn.
I understand what a field is and I understand Vectorspaces, subvectorspaces, but I do not understand what HomK(K^n, K^n) means and how I find a basis for that
Hom(K^n,K^n) is the space of all homomorphisms K^n -> K^n
ChatGPT explains it like this and I kinda understand what I have to do, but I am still unsure
actually correct. in general not a good idea to use chatgpt tho if you cant verify what it says
Maybe I look up some videos before solving the assignment, I come back to this if I have any more specific questions
.close
Closed by @regal cloud
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone check that 6/sqrt(85) is correct?
seems correct...
@fleet frost Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @fleet frost
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is the demoniator of 2s+1, i dont understand how its chosen
What is the original question?
There exists a unique positive đ â â such that đ^2 = 2. We denote đ by â2. im not quite sure how this will help with my question lol, but here.
they give a whole extra paragraph about how it might seem strange how the expressions are chosen
I understand that, but that doesnt explain to me why theyre chosen
or whats going on
ĂŻs it just to make this positive?
look carefully at the proof, see where the expression appears again and why it works
it comes up when you go (s+h)^2 -s^2
which im assuming is what theyre saying that h is a factor of that expression
why the subtraction of s^2???
okay i get the point of the demoniator now, but i dont get the point of subtracting s^2 from (s + h) ^2
oh wait nm, you subtract away and then bam
Gotta keep my head cool and stomach warm.
Thanks for not telling me, i get it now. That was hard to understand lol.
.close
Closed by @spring tapir
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i express this integral:
$\int \frac{\sin(x)}{\sin(x)\cos(a) + \cos(a)\sin(x)} ,dx$
snow
as
$\int \frac{\sin(x)}{\sin(x)\cos(a)} ,dx + \int \frac{\sin(x)}{\cos(a)\sin(x)} ,dx$
snow
or am i not on the right track
you are not lol
why
its like saying 1/(5+2)=1/5+1/2
oh is it because
i dont have like
sinx + 1
on the nominator
so i can split it like
you know the trig addition formulas?
what can we write the denominator as?
Closed by @lucid ether
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i start this question
lol i guess you could just compute random values and you'll eventually find the one that suits the best
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
is that acc how u do it?!
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @slender quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is this correct?
Nah
if Y = 0 and I'm trying to find x
I don't know about Y but to find x you need to
find the roots of x²-4
but, the dots will be empty
Cause it's in the denominator
I thought if I equal a fraction to a 0 then the denominator is erased
so I thought I found the dot at ( 25 , 0 )
ok, i will explain: if you have fraction it means or upper side is equal to zero or bottom is equal to zero
Not really, for x being the roots of x^2 - 4, the fraction will be indeterminate
25â 0
oh I see
that means the bottom is equal to +-2
yes, but no
can some one please explain this to me
Yes
Those are not the solutions
this is what I understood
You know that denominator never equals to zero
yes
if you put 2 or -2 it will be zero
but I want to know for the next time when I have more numbers
So no solutions
also X cannot equal to +- 2 in this function
When you have something of the form $\frac{f(x)}{g(x)} = 0$, you need to find the zeros of $f(x)$.
so I understand that there is no solution in this one
i mean maybe g(x) is also necessary cause maybe similar roots?
By finding the zeros of the denominator, $g(x)$, you just determine which points to \emph{not include in your domain}.
and if g (x) = 25 instead?
Similar roots? Do you have an example? It shouldn't be necessary to check g(x)
nah
in equations where we have same x in bottom and top
Ah, you mean $\frac x x$ for example. In that case, $f(x) = 0 \iff x = 0$ would be the zero of our numerator, but that is not in the domain of the function, so no zeros
You have to look at $g(x)$ to determine the domain of not already given
so this has a solution, but if we flip the fraction then we dont have a solution
Yes
Closed by @strong jetty
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Trig identities
Where's the question?
Can you translate into latex? I'm not able to read that
I donât know how to use latex, but I can send the printed version
1 sec
Itâs part a @loud walrus
So you have to prove this?
Yeah
I then simplified it as cos(2x+x)
Then tried to solve it from there
When I did that, I got 1-4sin^2xcosx instead of 4sin^2xcosx
Wait, I have an idea
1 sec
Let me do it, one moment
Nvm it didnât work
Done
Have you tried, instead of expanding, reducing the RHS?
That's how I did
Use this
Wait, thatâs a thing?
Yeah but I got cosx - 2sin^2xcosx - 2sin^2xcosx
I see
Iâll try using that then
Wait
On the left side?
Oh, nevermind. Right side
Iâve been trying
But Iâm still not getting the correct answer
Iâve been on this one question for over an hour
I might just give up and use chatgpt honestly
You can use this.
cos(A)cos(B) = 1/2[cos(A+B)+cos(A-B)]
and apply to this part
and after you do it, you finished
the exercise
So itâll be equal to cos(3x) after I do it?
after you do it, it will be a trivial sum which will be equal to cos(3x)
Dude thereâs no wayâŚ
@loud walrus I realized that this was literally all I had to do
I FEEL SO STUPID 
I DIDNT EVEN DISTRIBUTE THE COSX PROPERLY SO IT DIDNT WORK
Did you try what I told you?
Use this cos(A)cos(B) = 1/2[cos(A+B)+cos(A-B)]
in this specific part
What's the value of A and B?
This is cos(3x) + cos(-x)
since cos(-x) = cos(x)
Ok
Then expand the sum and difference ones right? (Which are cos(a+b) and cos(a-b)
@empty linden Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey guys, I'm trying to understand a specific part of a proof of why I is ideal - Ring theory
$r,s \in R$ (R is a ring) $ a\in I,~I\leq R$ a connective subgroup.
$(r+I)\cdot((s+a)+I) = (r\cdot(s+a))+I=(rs+ra)+I=(r+I)\cdot(s+I)=rs+I$
I understand why those are true but then they suggest that $rs+ra-rs=ra \in I$ and I don't understand why they went to this line and why it's true.
Any help?
meitar5674
they dont know that I is an ideal yet i dont think
if x + I = y + I, then that means x-y is in I. apply this with x = rs + ra and y = rs
@opal flare Has your question been resolved?
Canât it be that x-y=0? Or 0 also in I so we are ok?
Exactly
I mean, I got to the same point but couldnât understand why canât x be equal to y
that could be the case but yeah then the statement still holds bc 0 in I (since I is a subgroup under addition)
Oh right so it just doesnât matter whether or not itâs 0 cuz anyway it gonna be in I
Hopefully I just got the transitions and their correctness correctly
yeah whatever x and y are, if x + I = y + I, then x - y = something in I (this could be zero)
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anyone explain this step
where the white is? They're saying that the proportion of l, m, and n is $mâď¸-2m$
Katharine
stupid emojis
where the white is? They're saying that the proportion of l, m, and n is $m:m:-2m$```
snow
Closed by @halcyon turtle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am not quite getting this
anyone mind like, explaining this alternatively?
ok i think i get everything except what in the yellow
why does adding 6 'fix' the sum? 
and also i dont get where the extra 1 is coming from when they talked about the maximum sum
like obviously the biggest number you could have in BCD is 9
so 9 + 9 = 18 so where is this 1 carry coming from
im gonna say something badly worded: it's the difference between the decimal and hexadecimal coding
yeah i understand that how does that actually fixes it 
hmmmm
actually
before we get to that
can you please elaborate on why 10011 is the maximum sum you can get and not like
10010
previous?
like from the previous digit?
first line in this image
yes then you'll get at most 18
they're also considering that a 1 carry might have come in from the previous digit
since yknow you gotta do that
for multi digit addition
okay yeah i get that now
oh WAIT i think i totally get it now
the previous carry are those like 1's right
that came from the addition of 4+6 (for the middle 1) and 8+7 (the last 1)
thanks
.close
Closed by @night mason
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@upbeat maple Has your question been resolved?
do you know that equation of pair of angle bisector of ax^2+2hxy+by^2 is (x^2-y^2)/(a-b)=xy/h
it's a question on equation of angle bisector of pair of lines
ah, Ok
just compare the given equation with the standard form and substitute
OK, then factorise to obtain the lines and then compare to the given options
nvm, that will be nasty here, better use @civic sequoia 's idea
@upbeat maple Has your question been resolved?
using formula seems quickest. even though i've never heard of this formula, but it seems right. sorry i lacked the time to derive it myself.
another way is to factorize the two given quadratic polynomials (with real-valued coefficients).
hint: ||complete the square and use difference of two squares||
The answer is supposed to be 5
But I got something else
Can someone walk me through how to solve that equation
What did I do wrong
Closed by @upbeat maple
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #âhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
in the following image
Is AOEC a square?
okie okie i get it
