#help-17
1 messages · Page 85 of 1
ok
i gotta sleep
YouTube is confusing
its not
: (
This video introduces the Distributive Property in its general algebraic form: a(b + c) = ab + ac It shows how this patten is helpful when working with polynomials.
Part of the Algebra Basics Series:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NybHckSEQBI&list=PLUPEBWbAHUszT_GebJK23JHdd_Bss1N-G
Learn More at mathantics.com
Visit http://www.mathantics.co...
here
Good night
Bye
@sturdy geyser Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @sturdy geyser
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how is b injectiev?
ah nvm im a fuckwit
I get how d is injective
sorry
holy ahsit
okay restart
question 28d
f is NOT injective, because multiple inputs can lead to the same output
for example, x = 1, and x = 0, both lead to f(x) = 0
however in terms of surjectivity
i don't see how it isnt surjective?
I even graphed it out
ahh
no nvm i dont see it
nvm i’m literally brain dead
i get it
.close
Closed by @fathom hedge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is there a way to prove that this has max and min without differentiation?
Proving sin(cosx/x^2) has a max and min?
@minor blade Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
HI this is a puzzle and i can't figure it out... Does anyone have any idea how to solve the question? We need to figure out what the letters say
they give you a^-1, K and C. Input into the given equation.
For example at Q:
.. = 21(16-2)Mod26 = 294Mod26 = 8 corresponding to letter I
@ocean crypt Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
@chilly pawn.
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
1
hint: you want to factor the x
and have it on one side
=============
You know how to solve equations of the form
Mx = c
where M is a constant matrix
c is a constant vector
x is a variable vector
so try putting it in this form
so try again with this in mind (i edited the above message to make it clearer)
see my comment above
I’m ultra confused
can't just do that.
or maybe u can, but i wouldnt advise it
i dont think u can.
============================
also, as an aside (M | c) = x
I dont like this notation with the augmented matrix, cant make sense of it.
youve also confused 4x with x
because youre apparently using x = (x; y; z)
But in any case, I don't know if this approach works.
I know it doesn’t but i didn’t understood your previous comment
Can you clarify further?
=============
You know how to solve equations of the form
Mx = c
where M is a constant matrix
c is a constant vector
x is a variable vector
are we on the same page with regards to this point?
before i go onto it actually, my 2nd point for why its wrong is
you've misused x
ones a scalar, ones a vector
- dont reuse letters
- remember whats a scalar, whats a vector
@chilly pawn that make sense?
ok thats 10x better
thats how ur supposed to do it
except for some reason you put x on the left
it should be on the right
You are right
so you want to consider this question for Ax = b in general, lets say
First of all, consider Ax = 0
Oh, before I even get there - let me just point out this question generalises beyond square matrices
so while det might be useful for square, you probably want to think about it generally
Are you aware that we can think of this in terms of the linear transformation T(x) = Ax
Then ker T = null A.
(@ me when ur back)
Yes
Then as you've, spotted, this has something to do with
dim ker T
the dimension of the kernel
or rank(null) (im not so familiar with this notation)
but its > 0, you're interested in not > 1
===
if dim ker T = 0
This tells you the kernel is 0 dimensional. ie, ker T = {0}
If dim ker T > 0, then the kernel contains infinite points (it must be a line or a bigger subspace)
===
If that all makes sense, this characterizes the number of solutions to Ax = 0. Either 1 or infinite, depending on the dimension of the kernel.
Which makes progress towards your originial question of when Ax = b has infinite solutions
🤔
lmk if anything didnt make sense, or we can continue
I think we may assume it’s a square matrix
Prolly it’s easier with determinant no?
yes, we can get there once we come to a conclusion
but not quite yet
the determinant is just another way of checking the dimension of the kernel
T(x) = 0 has infinite solutions iff dim ker T > 0
but what about T(x) = b
if you think about it geometrically, the image of T could be a plane in 3d space say
Then we could have no solutions if b isn't on that plane
so for an affine equation, you also need to check for this, basically
- b is in the image of A
- A has ker > 0. (if A is square, then det A = 0)
Ok we can check 2
But i don’t know what image is
Ah image is being in the column space of the basis?
column space of the matrix? yes
im not sure if there is a faster check for now
oh right, thats fairly fast tbh
it corresponds to your row reduction being consistent or inconsistent
inconsistent -> no solutions
Actually, now I think of it, you should hopefully have been told how RREF form of a matrix characterizes how many solutions the linear system has
if there's an inconsistent row -> no solutions
if you have a row of 0's (and no inconsistent rows) -> infinite solutions
otherwise (in the case of a square matrix, identity matrix) -> one solution
Alright one sec xd
it should be clear to you why, if you reread it carefully and check the original question
you have to augment the matrix with b 
oh wait
maybe you're doing something different
like, for there to be infinitely many solutions to Mx = b, you must first have det M = 0, because otherwise M is invertible and there is a unique solution for every b. so you need to find what values of k make the determinant 0. then, for these values, you have to check when b is in the column space of (A - 4I)
whenever the determinant of (A -4I) is zero and b is in the column space of (A - 4I)x = b, you will have infinitely many solutions (and vice versa)
@chilly pawn Has your question been resolved?
😮
How to do det = 0 with this polynomial
This is from here
i got something else for the determinant
, i think
yeah
it should be much simpler
i would recommend reducing the matrix a bit, first @chilly pawn
it makes it easier to compute
you can row reduce it to an upper triangular matrix pretty easily, and then the determinant is just the product of the diagonal entries
😮


, so k = 0 or k = -3
so the equation can only have infinitely many solutions if k is one of these numbers
now you have to check if the vector b is in the span of the columns of (A - 4I) for each value
to check if b is in the span of the columns of a matrix M, you form the augmented matrix [M | b] and row reduce it
if you get a row like [0 0 0 | a] with a nonzero, then b is not in the span of the columns of M
pog. so if k = 0, you see that the system is inconsistent
sine the last row is [0 0 0 | -9]
so there are no solutions when k = 0
now just do k = -3

K = -3 what
We get a zero row
you know that the only possible way for the system to maybe have infinitely many solutions is when det (A - 4I) = 0. this means that k = 0 and k = -3. when k = 0, the system is inconsistent, so there is no x such that (A - 4I)x = b. but now you just have to check k = -3
yeah 
but its all good otherwise
if i remember correctly from yesterday
so there are infinitely many solutions in this case 
yeah 
yee
Closed by @chilly pawn
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm doing a projection vector question and idk how to put |a| in equation one
Can someone solve and send me a pic?
Open your own help channel. Refer #❓how-to-get-help
Delete the messages here.
Projection is not b + a(vector).
Projection of vector $\vec{A}$ along vector $\vec{B}$ is equal to $\vec{A} \cdot \vu{B}$.
Enemagneto
You need to find projection of b along a. That would be-
@fathom glen Has your question been resolved?
Yes thatc
Look at my question i already solved most
I just don't know how to put 17/10 in eq 1
You didn't solve most of it. You have only solved |a|.
Do dot product of a and b and divide by |a|.
Closed by @fathom glen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\ang{x_1,y_1,z_1} \cdot \ang{x_2, y_2, z_2} = x_1x_2 + y_1y_2 + z_1z_2$
CFN ON PC
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
What are you trying to find?
and fix the formatting first
@glacial onyx Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
The rectangle shown at right has been broken into four smaller rectangles. The areas of three of the smaller rectangles are shown in the diagram. Find the area of the fourth one.
PLEASE EXPLAIN
Maybe try labelling each sides 🙂
or just wait for someone else, i don't have a paint app
can't draw
k
@elfin ridge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I calculate lim n tends to infinity (1 + (1/3n) )^n?
$\lim_{n \to +\infty} (1 + \frac{1}{3n})^n$
Learath2
Is this the question? and is n integer?
u = 3n might help you see
My prof hasn’t explained why lim n tends to infinity (1 + (1/n))^n = e
She just told us that it is
And asked us to use it
That’s usually a given in most calc 1 courses
It’s kinda the definition of e 😄
Well one definition of e
Oh okay
here's a proof from my calc textbook
Ohh so will the answer be e^(1/3)?
Closed by @ocean zinc
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
what does note that w* = w^2
omega^* means the complex conjugate of omega.
And it's pointing out that omega squared is the same thing as the complex conjugate. Because it is--the only difference between the two is the imaginary part is negative in omega^2 vs in omega.
Interestingly z_3 is labeled incorrectly on the diagram.
It's written correctly in the box next to the diagram, so I assume it's just a mistake.
@void relic Has your question been resolved?
@exotic mason thank you for the help I understand it better now
Closed by @void relic
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello I need quick help about basic equation. IS that i'm not pretty sure of what i'm doing, and i'd like to know a bit more.
The following question is can I say that 1/4x = 0.25x ?
Sure
Oh so I can right?
1/4 = 0.25
Yea I wasnt sure
because maths rules etc etc
we never know, but thanks alot you're really fast
Just be careful, the x is still being multiplied by 0.25
yea
It doesn’t become like a digit 😄
(0.25)x is how I usually write it, just to make it easier on the eyes
.close
Closed by @harsh zenith
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hi, i'm working on continuity and I need some help explaining why this is DNE for this problem
Show the entire original question and answer
|x| is continuous so you're leaving something out
and i do know that then when we find the limit of x approaching 3 is going to be:
lim x -> -3 = |x| -> 2
lim x -> 3 = |x| -> 3
the whole question is to find out: f(x) = |x|, a = 3 is continuous or not
i think i'm confused because i don't know how it's DNE
who says that it is
.
the entire original question is:
use the definition of continuity along with the properties of limits to show that the function is continuous at the number a
f(x) = | x |, a = 3
Yea no
is he wrong lol
https://math.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Combinatorics_and_Discrete_Mathematics/Elementary_Number_Theory_(Clark)/01%3A_Chapters/1.04%3A_The_Floor_and_Ceiling_of_a_Real_Number
[[x]] is the same as 1.4.1
got it, i just realized i never learned this
thanks for clarifying that
so after reading up on it a little more, i do understand the general idea of floor and ceilings, but why does the answer still not exist
is it because there are two answers technically
Do you know what it's called when two one sided limits at one point aren't equal
no i haven't learned
is this ur explanation to why it's dne
DNE covers more cases than that but yes
i dont mean to sound rude or annoying to u but i didnt understand ur explanation thats why
i just started my prof's lesson & he doesnt explain well either since he doesnt speak good eng so thats why i came on here to get a better explanation since i dont understand his reasoning
Closed by @azure pasture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey could someone help me with this question I couldn't really find anything that would help me online
Probably finding the consecutive differences
Quadratic sequence -> second differences are constant
@vestal depot Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
cosec theta plus cot theta upon cosec theta minus cot theta is equal to cosec theta plus cot theta whole square is equal to 1 plus 2cotsquare theta plus 2cosec theta cot theta
$csc\theta + cot\theta = (csc\theta + cot\theta)^2 = 1 + 2cot^2 \theta + 2(csc\theta)(cot\theta)$
Learath2
This is what I could make out, is this it?
yess
no, it isn't, right? Your first expression had a denominator
$\frac{csc\theta + cot\theta}{csc\theta - cot\theta}= (csc\theta + cot\theta)^2 = 1 + 2cot^2 \theta + 2(csc\theta)(cot\theta)$
Learath2
now its correct
@dire coral Has your question been resolved?
@dire coral Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I know that the domain of f-1 is not just the doman and that something effects it but I am not sure what
could someone explain iy yo me
,rccw
I know yhat the domain of f is the range of f inverse
and that the domain and range usually dont effect each other…?
Closed by @full vessel
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
bruh
wait
im super confused on how to do these two problems
my teacher hasnt covered this 😭 can someone plz help
im so lost
You'll basically plug it into a graphing calculator or a spreadsheet (Excel, Google Sheets, etc) and tell it to do a linear regression.
does desmos work
Probably
Yeah
ok one sec
I don't think desmos can do linear approximations
Creating a regression in the Desmos Graphing Calculator is a way to find a mathematical expression (like a line or a curve) to model the relationship between two sets of data. Get started with th...
Me neither, but there's a help article. 
Oh, it probably is. They're just ... very far up.
idk what tf to do w this information tho
i hate desmos
You can click the zoom fit icon to automatically adjust to the data.
If you hit the wrench, you can set the scale
That last point looks way too wrong
But there are such things as outliers
The last point fits the data that was sent, yeah.
Gotta be y_1 too
where do i put the y_1
In place of the y
Yup! And it did the thing. You've got the equation of a line it figured out.
Desmos is actually kind of good at this. Neat.
Yep
Yes
Well, it does tell you to talk about what the slope means, and what the y-intercept means, and such.
But that's the equation for sure.
But not the answer to the full question
okay let me put the equation
how do i interpret the slope and y-intercept in this situation 😭
Desmos has been a life-saver whenever I'm interpolating polynomials 
Did you look at example 4?
im so sorry usually id know more but my teacher didnt go over this
wait one sec
y=723.214(11)+31867.5
to find the average because its 11 years apart right
I've used it like twice ever. I'm a dinosaur I suppose. In grad school we used Mathematica and Maple, and then I latched onto Geogebra after I started teaching and never learned anything else. 
Seems right.
oh don't get me wrong Wolfram Mathematica is good too, and im ngl idek what Maple is 
I did physics, and the theorists liked Mathematica and the Experimentalists liked Maple. I think it's more engineer-y.
If I were reporting the answer I'd round but it doesn't say you have to. shrugs
umm ill just keep this answer
okay thank you so much
how do i interpret tho
idk how tf to do that
(Best practice would be to round, to be clear, because there's no way this process will get you meaningful precision to three decimal places.)
Sure, I suppose that works. Like I said, I'm not grading it so I don't know how weird your grader is gonna be.
So, what does the slope mean here, anyway?
she grades weird asf so she'll find a mistake either way
OHH so i say like
723.214 per month???
no but that doesnt add up
It's rise over run, right? So it's a change in money, but how much time does going from 0 to 1 indicate?
In other words, what unit is x in?
So it's not per month, it's change in tuition per year.
@misty sky Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @misty sky
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey this was on a quiz and im looking as i do quiz corrections and wondering if this problem is even solvable
I guess they could have meant (3,9) but that’s just a wild guess
Or find a tangent line to x^2 that passes through (3,7) but I never remember doing a problem like that
i bet its (3, 9) intended
If this is calc 1 I’m guessing it’s supposed to be (3,9) but no idea lol
@alpine mica Has your question been resolved?
so it was no solution otherwise yes?
This was on a quiz man they shouldnt have two errors since i have a problem just like this where it is not solvable
@alpine mica Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @alpine mica
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$f\left(x\right)=\sqrt{-\left(x-4\right)}$
Akira 🍉
Why does my teacher's answer sheet state that $f(4) - f(-5) = -8$ when Desmos calculates it as -3?
Akira 🍉
Show the answer key
-3 makes sense as an answer, it might be an error on your teacher's behalf
Could have been a horribly written 3 that looks like an 8
no wait shit i think i got the wrong equation I mean im not exactly sure how would find an equation from graph
this one
Can you send a screenshot of the question you are doing? Like not just the graph but everything else relating to the question?
find f(4) and f(-5) on this graph, then subtract them
f(4) = -3
f(-5) = 3
-3 - 3 = -6 ...
Yeah... still not a -8
for f(4) I found -3 and for f(-5) is 3 so my final will be (-3) -(3)= -6
i think there's something wrong I did
you sure this is the correct answer key? Even 3c looks off, teacher might've given you guys wrong answer key
it's section 3
its just a horridlywriten -6
that's a possibility too lol
hence horridly
Email your teacher about it, it looks like they have made a mistake with the answer key
C and D don't match the key here, the blue text
okay
you answers are correct, it's the answer key that's wrong for these questions
my answers are written in blue do think it's right?
Yeah your answers look right so far
so which one should I let him the answers are incorrect?
for c and d right?
am I doing it right or no
I think my teacher is just mistaken
thanks for the help though
.close
Closed by @terse forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hii i need help with this
@nocturne isle
Wouldn't just the two horizontal tangents work? 😄
Ah gradient 2
k
Implicit differentiation to the rescue?
ok sure thanks
@nocturne isle Has your question been resolved?
I don't get what you are trying to do with (b+3)/(a+5) = 2, a line through the center? but why would you want that to have slope 2?
You want a line through the center that's perpendicular to the tangent lines
So $y + 3 = m(x + 5)$ with $m = -0.5$
Learath2
Then intersect the line with the circle
I get something like $(x+5)^2 + (\frac{x}{2} + \frac{5}{2})^2 = 80$
Learath2
Solved for x you get -13 and 3 as expected, so I think that's fine
I'll go get some sleep, good night
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
just wondering if someone could derive for a+(b/c) = (ac+b)/c, not sure exactly how it turns from one to the other
hello I am new
a+b/c = ac/c +b/c =(ac+b)/c
^ multiply a by c/c to get ac/c
if you need help w a question just go to #❓how-to-get-help
Closed by @oak silo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I can't see what's wrong either, after checking four different times I think nothing's wrong with your graph, could be something else
@boreal escarp Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @boreal escarp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So, from where I ended up, do you think it'd appropriate at this point to do a u sub?
I'm sure there was a point where I could have rewritten something earlier.
OR
did I start this problem wrong?
I wrote down in my notes from lecture that I won't always be doing this method
@brave ruin Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @brave ruin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
say $f(x)=a_0+a_1 x+a_2 x^2+...+a_{m-1} x^{m-1}+a_m x^m$
AℤØ
or something like that
similar with g(x)
when its the case that $m<n$ or such then it'd be better to write for $g(x)= b_0+b_1 x+b_2 x^2+...+b_{m-1} x^{m-1}+b_m x^m+b_{m+1} x^{m+1}+...+b_{n-1} x^{n-1}+b_n x^n$
AℤØ
as long as you can show what you need to
I know that the condition for f(x)/g(x) = 0 should be c/+-∞
How do i incorporate that
Sorry I'm really confused by this problem
I kind of don't understand why g(x) was written that way, why the m-1, m, m+1 then n-1, n?
if you multiply the numerator and denominator by 1/x^n, then youll find that all the terms for f will tend to 0 since theyll all be some a/x^c, and in the denominator youll just be left with the coefficient of x^n, so itll be 0/b_n
it was more to illustrate that n>m but i suppose its not strictly needed here
Hmm
b and c will follow a similar logic, just with different things being left over
at least thats one way to do it
Okay, i have to go now so I'll close this. Thank you for your help though i still need digesting
.close
Closed by @high saddle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi i need help with (3x-4)(x-4)(x+5)
i got 15x^3 -80x^2+80x but apparently it is wrong
can you show your steps?
looks good so far
wait hold on
(a + b)c ≠ a(bc)
yeah that
when it became then x(15x^2-80x+80)
(a + b)c = ac + bc
In other words, it should be this:
x(3x^2 - 16x + 16) + 5(3x^2 - 16x + 16)
you need to still do FOIL
yes then cant i multiply the x in now?
c whatever is the right side bracket
You can’t
(a + b)c ≠ a(bc)
(x+5)(3x^2-16x+16) ≠ x(5)(3x^2-16x+16)
@tidal cedar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
You really need to stop
sorry i really dont understand what i did
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
oh ok i undserstand now i will be back in 15 min
@vast shale you also haven't even asked a question
Read the message
Don't open a channel for nothing for helpers to help with
oh im very sorry
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @restive root
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
If I wanted to factor the denominator here, how would you approach it?
Is this an integration question?
Cause I guess I could do like (a^2+x^2)^1/2*(a^2+x^2)
it is yes
But I didn't think that part was important
Substitute x=a tantheta
really
I thought this was a partial fraction decomposition problem
you're saying use this one right
Yes
I can just rewrite the fractional exponent as a root
but I am still curious
would you be able to factor out the denominator ?
Factoring won't work here, i think
Yes
Closed by @brave ruin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
it's a decreasing function...
so on any interval of the form [x,infinity) it's bounded by the value at x
you can tell a function is increasing without taking the derivative
if it has the property that when a<b f(a)>f(b)
the function is decreasing
maybe you can show that this function has that property
e^-a < e^-b if and only if e^(b-a) < 1 if and only if b-a < 0 if and only if b < a
@tawdry hornet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi there I was wondering if I could get some feedback for my explanation of the signifigance of the chain rule. The importance of the chain rule is that it allows us to find the input with respect to the input of the composite function within the function as oppose to the derivative being with respect to the output of the composite function within the function, which would not be useful as it would not be the original value we plug in for x, hence it doesn't provide any useful info as such.
To summarize what I said if we have a composite function like f(g(x)) we want to know the instataneous slope with respect to whatever we input for x.
If the instataneous slope was with respect to g(x) its fine, however it doesn't provide any useful info as such as the instantaneous slope of the function would be with respect to the output of the composite function, and because we cannot control what the output of the composite function is it wouldn't provide any useful info as such.
It's a very good explanation in my eyes, it's pretty clear.
honestly overkill imo but im afraid to ask for more details.
thank you!!
However, you could rephrase it.
exempli gratia
The chain rule allows us to find the derivative of a composite function with respect to its input, rather than with respect to its output. This is important because it allows us to study the behavior of composite functions in a much more meaningful way.
I tested it out with values and stuff.
Ik, its overkill, but I just want to understand I fully understand it and can then make it more concise
im explaining it to myself
so overkill is fine.
whoever assigned you that is committing a crime
nobody assigned me.
I love understanding things myself.
and so I rlly try to ensure I understand the concept yk. Like I can explain it to a five year old. Cus I find maths to be beautiful.
When there is a theorem or formula I try to elarn it. Although my knowledge is fairly little compared to many here, I am doing what I can.
Sure it takes extra time, but I'd rather ensure I understand the concept even if its overkill or more work. Idc, bcus I enjoy it and don't see it as work.
Us bro
@broken nimbus Has your question been resolved?
💕
Closed by @broken nimbus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can i get some help
can i get help finding the derivative
I can help with that
do u distribute the x^2/3
Yes
or do we use the derivative of it first
Distribute first
lol
well
x^2/3 times x
what does that make
(x has a power of 1, or a power of 3/3)
x^5/3
x^5/3 / 5
yep, you got it right
so when you distribute you get x^5/2 / 5 + x/2
Do you know the power rule?
i forgot it
yea
and you wanted to know the derivative of that
yepp
okayokay i remember
yeah, you could use this rule here to find the derivative
try it and lemme know what you get
oh
Yeah, it's easier when you put the fraction out lol
try again and lemme know what you get
You multiply them, then subtract 1 from the power
It's easier to subtract 3/3 from the power (3/3 is the same as 1)
wait can i get a visual on that
idk how ur multiplying then subtracting 1
can u do it on just one so i can try the other
Yeah, first thing multiply the coefficient by the power, then subtract 1 from the power (I subtracted 3/3 rather than 1 to make it easier to subtract fraction)
I can help you with the (5/3)/5 and (2/3)/2 stuff as well
After you get this part though
okay so its (5/3)/5 x^2/3 + (2/3)/2 X^-1/3
how do i simplify it more
okay
Okay, so first of all, multiplying (5/3)/5 by 1 should give you the same number
And we know that (1/5) / (1/5) equals 1
When you multiply both sides by 1/5, the bottom will be equal to 1
The top will be easy to find then
@dawn latch that's how you simply the fractions
Once you get the fractions set, I'll show you how to deal with negative exponents
(making another visual)
so do i simplify the fractions leaving out the x and their exponents for now
Yes, do the fractions first, don't change x
as long as the x is outside the fraction
(1/3)x^2/3 + (1/3)x^-1/3
okay
Now that the fractions are simplified, you can move the x^-1/3 in
and (x^2/3)/3
You can do that with the other x if you want, up to you
so i need to only do it to one
You don't need to do it to only one, but doing it here will help you get rid of the -1/3
I want you to think of this again
You can replace the 1 with x^1/3 over x^1/3
x^-1/3 times x^1/3 will give you x^0, and any number to the power of zero equals 1
That's another part of the equation, you can simplify every part individually, then put them together
oh i see
As long as they're separated by a + or - you can work on them individually
You should get something like this
this was the answer
how did it go to the denominator
Look back at this image, multiplying it by 1 got you the same value
So I replaced the 1 with x^1/3 / x^1/3
And multiplied again
The top numbers in the fraction multiplied by top numbers, to get 1
Bottom numbers by bottom to get 3x^1/3
In other words... if you multiply an exponent by -1 you can move it to the other side of the fraction
They're both the same answer, just written differently
yepp
I just tried showing you why that method works
When you combine that with the other part of the equation you get this
Both numbers have a common factor of 1/3
You can take out the 1/3 to simplify it more
1/3 ( x^2/3 + 1/x^1/3 )
And remember, you only need the critical points
in other words, a value for x that would make the equation equal to zero
wats next
See if you can plug zero in for x, what would you get
is this the final
or this
They're both the same equation, but this one is easier to work with
Yeah, look here, you want a value where this whole thing will be equal to zero
If the numbers inside the parenthesis equal to zero
then this equation will be equal to zero
finding the x value or are you asking how I got the other x in the equation
finding the other x value
Look at it visually first, you know you want the signs to be opposite (one to be negative and another to be positive) to get zero in the parenthesis, so it has to be a negative number
Plugging zero in for x will give you a divide by zero error
So let's start with plugging -1 for x to get an idea of what we might get
Use a calculator if you'd like for this part
its because
i asked others wat they got
and they said x=0 and x=-1
im wondering how they got the -1
If x=-1, then plugging -1 in for x here would get you zero
but I'm not sure about the x=0, that doesn't seem like an answer
I graphed our derivative function, at 0 you have a divide by zero error so it can't be right
But -1 does seem to be the answer
It seems that 0 is not defined in the derivative function but here it is in the original equation
ah right, I forgot about the limit stuff 🤦♂️
im confused on how we get x=-1
go back up here
okay i ahve this written
as the final
then the x=0 underneath
same equation as ours just written differently
yeah, it's the derivative, and if you tried plugging in points to find where it's equal to 0, you'd see that -1 would set it to zero so there's a critical point there
yep jimmy a minute, I'll see what I can do
You want to see where the equation equals zero
The 1/3 is easy to get rid of at first
u divided it right
Kinda
divided 1/3 to both sides
yes
which will make it still equal to 0
Now, you want to see what values for x will set this to 0
Fun fact, x^1/2 equals sqrt(x)
Let me explain visually
So, this has nothing to do with the equation, but it's like a simple rule that's helpful
oo okay ty
but we dont cuz its 2/3


math is drivin me insane sry

