#help-17
1 messages · Page 54 of 1
Okay well, a piecewise function is just, different functions depending on the value of the input
ah
so in your case, if x < -1, then you will have 6x+5
i see
that makes sense
if you want to graph it, it's just going to be pieces (this is where the name comes from) of different functions
so since they ask you for f(7), find which interval 7 belongs to, and plug in the correct piece
i see
i dont see where f(7) is on the thing
it doesnt list it out for me
it just says find
yeah I just noticed it too
undefined?
I suppose so? Since the function is not defined at x=7
it was undefined
Yes, if a number is not in an interval then it is undefined
anyways i got this new problem
from what i can see -1 is not listed
on the right side
it is
look carefully :)
The function literally does not define what the value would be, so it would be undefined (in the case for f(7))
Alright gotcha
i still dont see anything
x<-3 can be anything
x=-3 isnt it
What about the bottom one?
what does the underlined < mean?
that would still mean it would range from -2 to 2
right
it doesnt specifically identify that it is -1
only around that number
-3 to 2*. But yeah. Is -1 in that interval?
ytes
then the function exists at x=-1 :D
oh okay
random questionm sorta but
doesnt the -3<x mean that it cant be -3
since its only greater than -3
i see
real quick could you give me a short explanation on teh difference between a underlined < and non underlined one
imtyp0
yes
But the line on the left means that x can be equal to -4. However, since there is no line on the right, x cannot be equal to 4
if the line was on the other side that mean it could be 4 too right
yes
ok col
i get it
now that i know that the bottom one is within the range
what would be my next step here?
So, we agree that -1 is in the bottom one?
yes
then, f(-1) means replace x with -1
-3<-1__<__2
oh not in there sorry, in the function left of it.
yeah!
so -2 would be my answer then i assume
should be yes
I can try and graph it for you if you'd like. Maybe that'll help you visualize it more?
No problem :L
i think its fine and for this i just do the bottom one right
so my answer would just be 4
?
yeah
i see
since for the top one, x can't be 0
exactly
correct
Closed by @ornate lantern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does anyone know the answer to this
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
@flat wren Has your question been resolved?
@flat wren Has your question been resolved?
Thank you 🙏
Close
.close
Closed by @flat wren
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, I keep getting this problem wrong and I have no idea where I am messing up, can anyone take a look?
@flat wren ?
.close
Closed by @hearty delta
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone pls explain where I’m going wrong
the answer is supposed to be 0 i'm guessing?
oh you're asked to calculate the area between the curves
thought you were just calculating the integral
yeah
,w int -1 to 0 (4x^3- 4x)
,w int 0 to 1 (4x- 4x^3)
missing a square on the 2(-1)
right
@alpine notch Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @alpine notch
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Does the order of intigration matter while setting the Jacobian?
With u first im getting 1/7 but with v first I get -1/7 so I was wondering if the oerder mattered while chaninging bounds
<@&268886789983436800>
I unfortunately dont quite remember but i believe that the jacobian can be oriented either in the positive or negative direction so the order does matter depending on what you want to do
The result of integration should be the same under 2 different changes of variables
iirc
Ah crap
ok
@proven knot so if im switching the variables for this funtion
For region r
it does matter what i write first, even after the substitution
also how would I know which is the right order?
That unfortunately i dont remember
I switched it around really quickly and the answer did not seem to change
so maybe not?
the negitive/pos J is throwing me off however
If you do the algebra right the coordinate change should.get you the same integration
iirc if you switch the order it may cancel out
Yeah, my only question is what is the right order according to the basic funtion
The extra negative cancels elsewhere in the algebra
Hmm ok
so not safe to assume it will always work out but it just did in this case?
This was kinda my work, but for the last final int where would i know what the right order is
or if J should be post or neg
My vague recollection is that it should work out if you do the algebra right but like i said im just trying to offer something from what i remember of calc 3
ah ok no worries
Ill just keep this up incase someone else knows
Thank you so much tho
Yw hope you get an answer
So this explains that the jacobian is the magnitude of the determinant
So it's always positive
You just take the absolute value if yoi got it negative
And then order of integration doesnt matter
Ah ok perfect
So regardless the Jacobin is always positive
And for the order just follow the normal rules and it works
Thats what they said in there and it corroborates my hazy memory of these problems lol
Yeah the Jacobian is always positive
It doesn't matter, but one order of integration might be more convenient than another
@hearty delta Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone help me with this
A sample 15 appliances with standard deviation of .15v. construct a 95% confidence interval for the standard deviation and the variance.
@crisp rampart Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @crisp rampart
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
An upscale resort has built its circular swimming pool around a central area that contains a restaurant. The central area is a right triangle with legs of 60 feet, 120 feet, and approximately 103.92 feet. The vertices of the triangle are points on the circle. The hypotenuse of the triangle is the diameter of the circle. The center of the circle is a point on the hypotenuse (longest side) of the triangle. The building permit that the resort obtained requires that the resort state how much water the pool will hold so the city can manage the resort’s water rights effectively.
The resort owner wants to line the largest circular edge of the pool with 24K gold leaf. Explain how to determine how many linear feet of gold leaf you need for this task.
is the question asking for the circumference of the whole circle or just half the circle?
i'm confused on what the largest circular edge means
@bleak fractal Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @bleak fractal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this what its asking me to do?
Yeah looks right
Well you already showed x-2 is a factor by polynomial division right?
Yes
And you factored it further in the work you posted
You should be done with the question assuming you also showed work for the division
So its like that is the final answer and the complete way right?
yep
Okay then, thank you 
np :D
.close
Closed by @plush shoal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
You invested your summer earnings into an annuity from which you can draw expenses while you are at university. If you need to withdraw $1200 each month for 9 months of university, how much do you need to invest in an account, earning 6% per year, compounded monthly, in order to cover your expenses?
I got an anwser of 855.21
that sounds way too low
how are you gonna make even your first withdrawal of 1200 if you have under a thousand bucks in there
ill show you my work
also
bi monthly in 6 years
,rccw
bimonthly??
ffs
lets focus on this one
dont try to ask about two different questions at once
alright
$PV = R \cdot \frac{1 - (1+i)^{-n}}{i}$ is your formula?
Ann
looks a little sus if you ask me
i am not 100% sure if this is the right formula
isn't this the same question from yesterday
i am losing interest rather quickly in this
🤨
How much money would be needed in order to withdraw \large $1000 at the end of every year, for \large 4 years, from an account that earns \large 8% interest per year, compounded annually?
In this problem, we know R=1000, i=0.08, and n=4.
Substituting into the present value formula gives PV=\frac{1000\left [ 1-(1+0.08)^{-4}) \right ]}{0.08}.
This simplifies to give PV=\frac{1000(0.265)}{0.08}.
PV=$3,312.50
This means $3,312.50 would be needed in order to withdraw $1,000 annually for 4 years.
deviousglxy
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
i have a feeling i'm going to spit venom if i continue
caught me lackin
so im out
It is the right formula
PV of an ordinary annuity
ok I was too lazy to do It yesterday and just took the pictures for our conversation
but im bugging out
how is the amount so low
i mean it can be right I guess
R = 1200, i = 0.005 and n = 9 sounds like what it should be to me
9 compounding periods and interest 0.5% per compounding period (month)
0.005
?
oh an error
0.5%/mo
mb
this is not it
mm i plugged in the wrong things
This is correct
i need to divide the rate by the amount of payments
like compounded weekly
monthly
and etc
?
Yes divide by the number it is compounded in a year
oh you did but you plugged in a difference question
0.05/12 in this instance
im assuming
Yes because it's compounded monthly
ok
Do i do 9/12
when I insert it
in the formula?
ya for sure
no nvm
It depends on if you are using 'n' as periods or 'n' as number of times compounded
mmm
If it's the latter, then you use nt
If the former, you just use periods
which is 9
so what should i do for this one
$1200\frac{\left(1-\left(1+0.005\right)^{-\frac{9}{12}}\right)}{0.005}=896.0804627$
deviousglxy
It should just be 9
$1200\frac{\left(1-\left(1+0.005\right)^{-9}\right)}{0.005}=10534.8767$
deviousglxy
Just by looking you know it's impossible for it to be 896
yep
- If $25, 000 is invested into an account paying 4.5% per year, compounded bi-monthly, how much money can be withdrawn from the account every two months for the next 6 years?
this uses same formula
only difference
is trying to find
the r
also how is this compounded
We are trying to find PMT
mmm so it is different
Well you can use the same formula, just rearrange to solve for PMT
what is the better alternative
Use a financial calculator/excel
It's just an easy way of solving time value questiosn
questions
You feed it the known values and it calculates the value you're looking for
ya I used one yesterday to check for anwsers
I dont get the every 2 months
for the next 6 years
so
1/6 multiplied by 6
which is just 1
6
That's what you use
Yes
which is 36
I dont know why I tried to divide
so what is going to be the rate
I have 0.045
divide by the 36?
which would be
then im going to have to use 6
For rate you always divide it in the context of how many times it's compounded in a year
Mhm
mmm
$25000=x\left[\frac{1-\left(1+0.0075\right)^{-36}}{0.0075}\right]$
deviousglxy
oh thats what you use
are there actual
calculator
that are meant for finance that arent online?
def should get one
they will make my life much easier
thanks a lot
for all the help
have a great night
.close
Closed by @spark cloak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Okay, so I've been working on this problem for a couple days now and I've hit a roadblock and now I'm starting to get desperate. If you haven't seen the meme below, it's a false proof that π = 4. This is obviously wrong; however, folding in the corners actually does more closely approximate the area of the circle, so I was wondering if I could use this to get a new series definition for π.
The graph depicts each of the corners of each iteration of the "square" on a quarter circle. If I can find the coordinates for all the infinite coordinates for each iteration of the "square", and then find the area of the rectangle between that point and where it ends up when you fold it, I can simply subtract the sum of all those rectangles' areas from the unit square to get the area of the quarter circle (π/4). Using a bit of basic geometry, you can get a sort of recursive formula for the corners and the area removed when a corner is folded up (both are shown at the top of the notebook paper). However, this isn't quite good enough to immediately form a series so I've been chasing after a more general form.
I decided to organize the coordinates in a pascal-esque triangle where each corner produces 2 new corners: the one one the left keeps the x coordinate and the one on the right keeps the y coordinate. I've also denoted them as [n, k] where n represents the nth row and k represents the kth column (both indexed at 1 rather than 0). While I have been able to spot that half of the points are just reflections of the other half and I've written down a couple general forms for specific values of k, I still haven't found a general form for [n, k] or noticed any possible patterns. It is here that I ask for help if you have the time.
@tacit hill Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
Just an acknowledgment of seeing the question would be nice if possible 👍
i found this on the internet
i can't help you with the problem though just thought the meme was interesting
the problem is it doesn't actually converge to the circumference of the circle.
^
there's always intervals where the rectangle is off the circle only scattered points that are on the circle. So the perimeter of the rectangles will always be strictly larger than the circumference of the circle with a measurable difference
I wasn’t asking about the perimeter? I was asking about the area
And I have tested it experimentally, it genuinely does approximate pi/4
XD I was just looking at the meme, I didn't scroll up to see the question lol
Bruh moment, I don’t blame ya though lol
the area should work if you can write that area as a series.
I need the general form for [n, k] to make a series for that though
So far I’ve only got a recursive form
that... is not my specialty, you'll have to get someone else's help for that.
Alright, back to my dwelling chamber
it wouldn't surprise me if this is a known series though. so some deep googling might be fruitful.
Don’t really know what to search for though
And it doesn’t look like anything I’ve seen on Wikipedia (granted, I’m famously very bad at googling things)
@tacit hill Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185> I don’t mean to push y’all but I haven’t gotten too much help
found this video about it
Follow me on twitter:
twitter.com/goldplatedgoof
please ping helpers only once
what you’re doing would converge to the area of a circle, yes
it’s essentially integration
Oh sorry sorry
whether this is novel or not, i don’t know
but probably not
that’s not a diss
it’s just that these things have been looked at for centuries so it’s unlikely it’s new
I understand but I have no idea how I would begin to look for that
(in particular this is the limit of a riemann sum on sqrt(1-x^2))
well what’s your goal with this?
is it just to prove to yourself that no one has done it before?
I just wanna know if there is a general form for a given corner
then this is just a riemann sum
i can give you the general form if you give me a minute
i'll write (S_n) for the area after folding ((n-1))-times
[
S_n = \sum_{i=0}^n \frac{\sqrt{1-\frac{i^2}{n^2}}}{n}
]
let me double check this with a calculator, but i believe it should be it
ok there's a slight issue give me a sec
Aren’t riemann sums equally spaced along the x axis though?
they don't need to be
but this one i made is
and does your folding not follow an equally-spaced folding pattern?
maximo
No they are not equally spaced
then this is still a riemann sum but of the following form
[
S_n = \sum_{i=0}^n\sqrt{1-x_i^2}\Delta x_i
]
maximo
where (\Delta x_i = x_{i+1} - x_i)
maximo
there is an obvious off-by-one error here but i can't be bothered to find it
and note that this is only for the first quadrant, but you can just multiply this by 4
I mean this isn’t exactly the same as finding the coordinates for a given corner
how are you deciding when to fold?
Like sure you get the same area in the end but like plenty of formulas exist for pi
So you start with a given corner, fold it in such that it makes contact with the normalized point on the circle (keeps same angle), and the two new coordinates keep either the x coordinate or the y coordinate of the original corner
what is a "normalized point on the circle"
do you have a drawing of this or similar?
So if you have a line going from the origin to a corner, it’s where the line intersects the circle
I have some specific values and a recursive formula (very top of notebook paper) here if they are of any value
yeah ok nvm i don't see this having a nice explicit sequence
i mean it might but i don't think i could calculate it
Are there semi-similar problems that I can look to for inspiration?
probably, but i dont know of any off the top of my head
the good thing here is that we just want to find a sequence of sequences for the x values
the heights will be always solvable via sqrt(1-x^2) from there
Right and also because it’s reflected across y=x
(x, y) -> (x/sqrt(x^2+y^2), y) and (x, y/sqrt(x^2+y^2))
it also looks like rather than x and y, we just want to find the sequence for the angles
which should make this a whole lot easier
im struggling here since it's a 2d sequence but once you start with angles it should be more straightforward
Oh I mean the angles don’t look pretty though
yeah but it should be simpler to make explicit
something like arctan(something with n and m here)
oh my
there's a very nice sequence going on here
Hmm, I’m not sure if I see anything
let me work on it for a little longer and i'll share
ok so there is a very nice subsequence going on here
the furthermost line will have the form y = x/sqrt(n)
yesyes, that's the k=1 case for [n, k]
see the middle section: I've calculated them up until k = 4, but I haven't been able to string them together
also, more often than not the denominators are starting to look like a sum of (n-k)^k but 1. I don't know how to prove that and 2. it probably isn't true
i am inclined to agree with you. it looks like some sort of sum going on, but i can't put my finger on it
it does look like a very nice sequence though
like not completely dubious
yeah, feels just out of reach though unfortunately
I'm gonna look back at this and be so mad at myself lol
from the future: definitely am lmao, this was so much easier than I was making it out to be
it's almost 5 AM here, Imma probably call it a day now. let me know if you find anything!
there is this mse post about it https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/4485663/calculating-pi-by-subtracting-squares-from-a-circumsquare
the comments shared a recurrence relation
@tacit hill Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone possibly confirm my answer, just telling me if it's right or wrong
@white coral Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @white coral
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i'm annoyed rn
i don't understand this math
the lim(x-9) with x at -3 is limx-lim9
but then they have written -lim-1 here??? isn't this incorrect
i think the issue is they typoed an extra minus sign in
which is a mistake on their part
is the extra minus on the -1
ah ye
@digital shell Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$\int_0 ^\pi \frac{x \sin x}{1 + \cos ^2 x}$
Bettim
How to do this
what have you tried
The same idea as last question should take you somewhere.
missing dx btw
This looks like Kings rule
use I think you asked a very simlar question just now, use the same idea
We don't need the anti derivative
Of this specific function atleast
Kings rule and ||adding the integral to itself|| simplifies our job massively, I've spoilered it because I want OP to figure it out.
We just had the op do these exact steps 5 mins ago.
||can't you just use IBP?||
I don't think so, and even if you can, it's unnecessary
I mean x is an easy derivative, and sin(x)/(1+cos^2(x)) is also a pretty straightforward integral
How do I proceed
simplifies pretty nice too
ah
it doesnt have an elementary antidervative
i thought ibp first too
Wait where did the sine go
sin(x)/(1+cos^2(x)) is doable. But not afterwards.
After $2I = \int_0^{\pi} \frac{\pi \sin x}{1 + \cos^2 x} \dd x$
NEON
Good question lol wait I'll bring sine back
yeah, that makes it an easy u-sub from here
What will my u be?
there you go.
I get tan inverse?
indeed
ah wait arctan(cos(x)) ≠ cos(arctan(x)) 💀
,w intergate (sin x)/(1 + cos^2 x) from 0 to pi
pi^2/4?
right that seems good
yup, that's correct
Closed by @dim quail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i still cant seem to do this part of the question
im struggling with the partial differentiation of arctan
@fast quarry Has your question been resolved?
calculate d/dx tan^-1(x)
y = tan^-1(x) then tany = x and do implicit differentiation
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.reopen
✅
sorry just seen
but im doing partial differentiation so the tan y on the left just goes to 0 as you treat it just like a number or something right?
i dont put a dy/dx in there as its not treated as a variable
$\frac{d}{dx}tan(y) =sec^2(y)\frac{dy}{dx}$
WhereWolf
$sec^2(y)\frac{dy}{dx}=1$ and solve for dy/dx
WhereWolf
yes i understand that, but when doing partial derivatives, with respect to x, doesnt tan(y) go to 0?
when x and y are independet we do partial derivative
from tan(y) = x we get sec(y) = sqrt(1+x^2)
so d/dx tan^-1(x) = 1/1+x^2
with that info do your partial derivatives
okay
wait do u mind if i restart from this part, im getting very lost, sorry
im here now, definately something wrong right
hello
@proven garden
sorry to ping
so i need to put the derivative of arctan(yx^-1) into my answer for dh/dx.
but in my answer i get dy/dx = 0? is that the correct answer?
is that correct then?
no that's not how you do that
that's what I did to find d/dx tan^-1(x)
that's not applicable here cause y is not a function of x
do the partial derivative normally
i thought that is how to differentiate arctan
h = xtan^-1(yx^-1) and find h_x
I told you d/dx tan^-1(x) = 1/(1+x^2)
treat y as a constant and find d/dx h
I think you differentiated tan^-1(yx^-1) wrong
oh wait i see
btw d/dx tan^-1(x) = 1/(1+x^2) not x/(1+x^2)
that is u prime just place holder if the x is actually a function of x not just x
right?
meaning derivative of u
u'
better now?
this is where i got that formula from
lmao
when u = sqrt(x)
in my case i replaced it with u = yx^-1
and then continued to do the partial differentiation
yeah u have to use chain rule after the product rule right? sorry im trying this is kinda hard for me icl
oh that's fine
i thin im correct now
still wrong
damn
let me try again lol
surely this is correct now, pls circle the parts that are wrong if there are
i really cant spot
that seem's fine
Closed by @fast quarry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
i need help with finding the surface area of a cylinder. i know how to find the area of a circle but not the virtical part.
like do u want the formula for it or do u need help proving the formula?
i need the formula
like in this idk how to get the part of the rectangle
ty
np
how could i find the height?
.close
Closed by @pearl dragon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
6.5.1 I'm not too sure what the hint is trying to give me:
Corollary 6.5.1 tells me that (1/n^(1/k)) converges
Theorem 6.1.19 gives me the standard limit laws
How would showing that (n^q) does not converge help me
Ah okay nvm I misread the question oops
.close
Closed by @marsh coyote
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help solving 47.4 divided by 0.003 on paper
if you need to , turn them each into fractions
then use basic fraction division tricks
when i try to do it i get 158 as my answer and itss supposedly 15,800
i need to solve it just using division not fractions
each decimal can be represented as a fraction; its a way to eliminate decimal points and you'd be dealing with intergers for the most part
I am really confused as well because i thought there was supposed to be a decimal point
im not up to that stuff yet lol
youre telling me you dont know how to represent 0.003 as a fraction?
no
3/1000
show me your work.
as long as you dont majorly interfere, sure
Okey
its easy im just dumb
That's 0.003 divided by 158 your problem is the other way around
youre neglecting the decimal point and youre treating the divisor as 3 instead of 0.003
no 158 is the answer i get
i thought i had to move the decimal to the right 3 times or something
The problem is 158 divided by 0.003 right ?
Sorry 47.4 divided by 0.003
i mean 0.003 = 3 * 1/1000. If youre gonna divide 47.4 by 0.003 its gonna be the same as 47.4/(3 * 1/1000) = (47.4/3) * 1000
how do i show it on the paper though
it wants me to solve the problem in the way i was doing
you could.
this is what im going off of
yeah and this is why you gotta multiply your quotient by 1000 at the end
what youre doing is 474/3
you neglected the decimal point
I broke it down for you
so essentially the real work here is for 47.4/3
you multiply that quotient by 1000
since 1 divided by 1/1000 is the same as multiplying by 1000
im so confused by all this
158 x 1000 is 158,000
the answer is 15800
why is 0.003 3/1000?
You add 0.003 one thousand times to itself to get 3
So 0.003 can be written as 3/1000
Hence the 1000 as the denominator
And 3 as the numerator
i dont think im supposed to solve it like that i never learned this
Where are you from ?
all the other questions just required me to move decimal points and just divide normally pretty much
usa
what
oh ok thank you
If you myltiply by 1000 you remove the decimals
There is no other way you can remove the decimals exept by multiplying by 1000
i thought i was supposed to move the decimal in 0.003 to the right 3 times, 47.4 i would move the decimal one time so thats 4 decimal places. I divide 474 by 3 and then move 4 places to the left and put a decimal
how do i know when to multiply by 1000
on questions like this
Tbh i just know when i can't exactly explain it,
Sorry but i just know how to do math but not teach it
i think i did it finally
its ok i appreciate you taking the time to help me
i just had to add zeros in order to move the decimal three places
.close
Closed by @half sail
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi, so for this question how do we pick the bounds?
the bounds from 0 to y would be the standard way of computing P(X < y) for a fixed y, then the outer integral considers all possible values of Y
so if it was y<x would it be 0 and 9 and then 0 and x?
probably, 1s
hm?
actually no it wouldn't
oh ok
perhaps it would help to draw the joint support of X and Y and then look at the particular region X>Y
the geometry is slightly more complicated
the joint support is a rectangle
ok give me a second
the line y=x would be included though yes
ohhh
ok so its a rectangle bounded at x=0,9 and y=0,2
and with y=x going through it
and the area is the funtion of F
the region Y>X is above that line and is just a triangle
the region X>Y is below that line and is a trapezoid
nope
oh it doesnt go directly through the center
so the geomatry would be more difficult but i see how it would look graphically
tysm
.close
Closed by @hearty delta
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone expalin to me why the final answer isnt 36^11/10
i got everything the same except that its 36^11/10 because you multiply the 6s as well
What makes you think it's 36?
if you had like $3^2 \cdot 3^2$ do you think that would result in $9^4$?
Hayley
You don't multiply the 6's
oh
no i wouldnt
looks similar to when you simplify variables with exponents x^2 * x^2 = x^4
yes, it's exactly the same
so as a general rule if it has an exponent and its the same, dont multiply those 2 together
right?
correct, $x^a\cdot x^b = x^{a+b}$
Hayley
ok thank you!
,tex .exp rules
Hayley
.close
Closed by @spice ingot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with this question. I feel like its poorly written
ok
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
1
before you do that, you need to clearly define your variables
here it will be most helpful to make variables to represent the cost per minute and cost per mile.
c for cost per minute
m for cost per mile
as you say.
ok, so:
Ryan's first taxi ride was 3.0 miles, took 7 minutes, and cost $8.50.
can you write this as an equation?
(don't forget the $2 base rate)
so it would be c+r+2=8.50?
you still don't have any variable named r
my apologies
and now you've got your own variables backward.
done
would you like to rename your variables at this point so as to cause less confusion afterward?
or should we stick with these names
@vast shale ?
we should stick with those names
ok, as you say.
so the equation for the first taxi ride is 2 + 7c + 3m = 8.50
the second taxi ride
was 7.0 miles, took 14 minutes, and cost $16.00.
7m+14c+2=16
im assuming we solver for m and c
and then we use it to solve for the third equation now
yup
will do now
got my answer
its B
thanks
.close
Closed by @granite otter
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
studying for math placement test and i wont be allowed a calculator, dont know how id solve 7 root 128 without a calculator
where would i go from here
Well it’s kind of intuitive
Just 2, not really a method but just identifying that 128 is a number that is frequent
is there no method i can use to find the answer
i wont have time to experiment on the placement test 😂
nvm lol i found a yt vid
.close
Closed by @spice ingot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So here in the last line....pi/4 +pi = 3pi/4
Because x,y>0 but x+y/(1-x.y) <0
But my doubt is 3 pi/4 is not in range?
Yes
Never trust toppr
U indian
yes
-pi/4
See
Show me how? Why
I know this
What if x and y are <1 then your condition is false
But here x,y so we need to check as we discussed earlier
He made the condition
just positive
oh
From x,y>0
dont do that
if the condition is specifically given, then apply that
cuz most of the time xy is given less than 1
Ni kar rha yar
Is this generally true?
Konsi condition ki baat kar rha hai likhke Dede
the product xy
<1?
yes ig
X,y<1 bola h tumne
Hn ho skta hai kyunki ques mein bas x>y>0 diya hai
Toh ek ko 1/3 dusre ko 1/2 maanle
Ye question me x,y >0 hai and x+y/(1+x,y) <0 hone par pi + karne par
Pi+pi/4 =5pi/4
This is wrong because (-pi/4) hoga so 3pi/4
pi+pi/4=5pi/4???
Pi-pi/4=3pi/4
Ohh haaan edited
5 pi/4 range me ni h
Pi- pi/4 = 3 pi/4 hoga toh isme pi/4 ni ho sakta?
@timid shell @obtuse sierra
@elfin moon Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @elfin moon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find the first and second derivative of:
for first derivative apply chain rule
for the chain rule, i'm not sure what to put as the separate functions if that makes sense
you've got a composition of three functions here
yes
and they're all exp
the first function is the question one
the e^e^e^x
2nd function is e^e^x
3rd is e^x
The e-pyramid
Closed by @narrow olive
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is |x-1| the same as saying "x-1 or x+1"?
no
no. x-1 or 1-x
It doesn't mean "or", it's a value that depends on x
