#help-17
1 messages · Page 53 of 1
Show their circuit
Where did the current come from
we need to see where they labelled the currents
Idk this just isn’t clicking
So how do you label it??
I think I need this explained to me like I’m 5
i2 and i1 are coming to the point
whilst i3 is going out
coming= positive, out = negative => i2+i1-i3 = i2+i1=i3
above 5 ohm
there's an error in that line right? i2+i1-i3=i2+i1 would imply that i3 =0
This is beyond confusing
Look at it like this: when water flows through pipes and there is a junction, equal amounts of water flow into the junction as come out
Otherwise water would pile up
Ok yes that makes sense
In electricity it's the exact same. The current into a junction (=node) and out of has to be equal
Otherwise charge would pile up which is impossible
Ok
That's where the equation in A comes from
So how do you tell where it’s coming and leaving
You don't know that yet.
You take a choice of arrow direction and continue to work with it
So is I1 the entire circuit??
I1 here is the current flowing through the middle branch
from battery to the two resistors
Then why did this guy label it on the far right?
?
There's no i1 label on the right?
Well why isn’t I1 labeled anywhere
i assumed the middle arrow was I1
Ok how did he know it was going that way??
we dont
He didn't. Arrow directions are a choice
After the calculations we could find that i1 is negative
Ok
which means it's actually flowing downward
Which number?
All the answers
have you watched any videos about kirchoff laws?
He didn’t match an equation to an answer
you got three equations and three unknowns
u can solve it either through algebra or matrices
The method used assumes you have a solid grasp of the kirchoff laws
if you havent watched any video watch this
This physics video tutorial provides a basic introduction into kirchoff's voltage law which states that the sum of all the voltages in a loop must add to zero. This video explains how to solve kcl circuits by using kirchoff's loop rule to calculate the current flowing in a series circuit with multiple batteries / voltage sources. This video al...
@serene hazel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
👋 Hi!
I'm writing some mathematical statements for my friends to disprove and, of course, I want them to be as clear as possible.
I have defined an operator m: A x B → y, where A and B are subsets of ℝ and y ∈ ℝ.
If A and B are subsets of ℚ, the operator will output a number in ℚ.
What's the best way to describe this?
I think something similar to the concept of set closure under an operator would be perfect, but A and B are sets, not numbers, so saying that ℚ is closed under the operator m is just wrong
if you want mathematical language you can say that $m: \mathcal{P}(\R) \times \mathcal{P}(\R)$ and that $\mathcal{P}(\Q)$ is closed under $m$
Hayley
where P is the powerset
well its not tho
oh whoops
cause then you would expect that the result is a set again
just write down this condition in words
its fairly short
doesnt need a name probably
Ok!
you could say that the image codomain of m under the restriction to Q x Q is Q
and convert that to symbols if you really wanted, but i agree that writing it in words is probably best
Closed by @calm hinge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm looking to determine the sup-norm of $\frac{nx}{1+n^2x^2}$ on $x\in[1,\infty)$ (here $n$ is any natural number). If the interval was compact, I would know by the extreme value theorem that the function obtains a maximum there. However, with $[1,\infty)$ I'm unsure. I could look for extreme values at the boundary points and critical points, but I don't know if the function actually obtains a maximum there.
sunside_
you might want to look at the behaviour of the function as x tends to infinity
true
and then boundary and critical points is a good idea
at x=1, we have n/(1+n^2) (this is a boundary point); at x=1/n, we have 1/2 (this is a critical point); in the limit as x tends to infinity, we have that the function tends to 0
x=1/n is out of the domain anyways
oh, yeah, I was wrong there 🙂
if I could establish that the function is decreasing for all x in [1,oo), then clearly x=1 would be the max
So it's just plain decreasing
@halcyon sluice Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @halcyon sluice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im trying to solve this problem
and here is what i got, was I correct in treating Kmax as a variable in itself?
You’d probably have better luck asking this in a physics server
oh ok
@obtuse lintel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I have a few hard matrix questions
I've seen you do this a few times, you should send your question first while asking for help. Don't wait for anyone to respond before sending you question.
Closed by @solar lotus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is the set A={2,3,pi, 5/7} finite?
What do you think?
it has 4 elements, but the confuses arises when i think about decimal expansions
If I were to list it with decimals i cannot list it
what's your definition of a set A being finite?
I haven't gone through one yet, but bijection to N?
so the above set is countably infinite?
yes
and a set that has a bijection onto N is countably infinite
can this set have a bijection onto N?
It can certainly be injective, but what about surjective?
i don’t know if I can map ‘pi’ onto elements?
Pi is just a constant
why would you not be able to
you could even define your function to take pi -> 1
the function could be something like f(a) with a in A, = 7a if a is a rational, and = 1 if a is not a rational
verify that this is injective onto the naturals
I think my misconception is rooted because of misinterpretation of decimal expansion
I agree
7a if a is rational
and 1 if it’s not
?
Map 2 to 1, 3 to 2, pi to 3 and so on
well sure that works
the so on ends immediately though
after just 1 more term
map 5/7 to 4
and boom
now you have an injective function
is it possible for it to be surjective?
only 4 elements in N is mapped
so our set isn't countably infinite
so rest are not mapped
exactly
so we've deduced our set A is not countably infinite
the other options are it is uncountably infinite, or finite
which do you think it is?
finite it is
mhm
and there is a cool theorem here
basically saying that
if you can create an injection
but not a surjection
that set is 'less' in cardinality
than the other set
and the opposite holds
I don't know what you mean by that
we denote the cardinality of N as |N|
so any number as it’s alone can be mapped to some element in N?
sure why not
but what does it mean to count pi?
I don't know what you mean
I think my understanding of numbers are fundamentally flawed
lol, mb
because its decimal expansion does not terminate doesn't mean anything
for example
decimal expansions need not necessarily be unique
5.000.....=4.999999
but if we want to have every real number having one decimal expansion
then we always "pick" the repeating 9's
so 5=4.9999......
and we don't usual write 5=5.000....
and in both cases
the decimals don't terminate
just like in pi
i thought when we say countable we can completely recite the number
yet you wouldn't argue that 5 is infinite
countable is different terminology than infinite
and my point was the having an infinite decimal expansion does not change the fact that it is still just 1 number
5=4.999.... (infinite decimal expansion) pi=3.14159265358979323.... (infinite decimal expansion)
both are just singular real numbers though regardless
yeah, sqrt(2) has a long repeating decimal but it’s has a clear position in number line
that is because it is irrational, like pi
when it does not have an injective mapping onto the naturals
So the set of Reals cannot be mapped to N?
how do I see that?
(there are lots of proofs of that actually)
I can send you one I wrote up, but the typical proof is called Cantor's Diagonalization (that is what I used) and you could also just google it
Please send
I just know the terms in general out of being curious not the proofs
Is sup the upper bound of set?
the sup is the least upper bound of a set
okie
short for 'supremum'
I have only read the term L.U.B
same thing
Closed by @opal obsidian
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so like
is this true or false
cause if its liek circles on a graph
thats false
but like just circles in general
this question is confusing to me
if you take a circle and then move it, is it congruent to the original circle?
does it have the same center?
yea ok thanks
so it is false
right
.close
Closed by @silk bridge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ty ❤️
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no
shit
if you plug in x=pi/2, that equation would give you y = what?
no what number
cos is always between -1 and 1, it can't be 2
if x is pi/2 then what is cos(x - pi/2)
ok fair
it's simpler than that
if x is 7 then what is x - 7
7?
subtract 7 from that
my bad
yes
that was slow
0
so is y = cos x
no, what is cosine of 0
1
right
so if you plug in x=pi/2
your y value for y = cos(x - pi/2) is 1
but what is the y value in your graph at x = pi/2?
idk 😭
it's labeled right on the graph
that's the x value
idk what to call
what is the y value there
the y value is below the x axis when x = pi/2, right?
so the y value is negative
(specifically it's -1)
oh
whereas your equation says it should be 1
so your equation can't be the one that goes with the graph
nope, d is also wrong
omg
again, try plugging in x=pi/2 and see what D tells you the y value should be
yes, B is correct
hmm, probably the easiest way to do this one is to shift the graph downward by 1
if you do that, what function do you get?
nope
but..
this graph doesn't
oh
this graph has a maximum at pi/2
ok
and so does sine
so you should expect this to be y = sin(x) + something
or equivalently,
y + 1 = sin x
y - something = sin(x)
oh
well y + 1 = sin x would be equivalent to y = sin(x) - 1
y - 1 = sin x
yes
oh duh
that's the one
sure
.close
Closed by @hidden ginkgo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
assume that there's a polynomial cubic function f(x), and its leading term's coefficient is positive.
given that cubic function f(x) and the linear function g(x) been tangent to each other in x=1 and there's only one intersection point between the two function.
is x=1 where the Inflection point occur?
how to prove it?
i think it's not necessarily the case?
do you have any counter-example
lemme check with desmos real quick
for sure
do you notice there are 2 intersection points in your case
in which we can only have one as the question stated
ohhh
I feel uncertain about whether it is true that the inflection point occurs in, as neither can i find any of counter example nor a way to prove it
can i use neither...nor in that way
is it grammtically correct?
i think its something related to this:
https://brilliant.org/wiki/cubic-discriminant/
cubic discriminant
i know that stuff but i dont want to over-complicate the question
can't we consider it the geometry way, which is more intuitive in my perspective
i see
I don't really know then
can you do it with prove by contradiction?
just guessing
@waxen hawk Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I don't know where to begin the equation
@simple lark let x be the duration of Diophantus' life
write down each stage of his life in terms of x
Yes I get that part
x = childhood, youth, bachelor
but I really don't where to begin in this kind of problem
no bad
x is diophantus' entire life
childhood is one sixth of his life. how do we write that?
you should not overthink it
you should not make any new variables as there is absolutely no need for that
childhood =
youth =
bachelorhood =
marriage before son =
son's life =
grief of son's death =
fill in the blanks here
don't jump ahead
only fill in the blanks as i tell you to
in terms of x obviously
childhood, =1/6
youth = 1/12
bachelor = 1/7
Marriage = 5 years
son's life = 4
no
Grief of son's death = 1/2
childhood isn't 1/6
it's not one sixth of a year
it's one sixth of his life
which i have instructed you to denote with the letter x
so it is not 1/6 but x/6
also even with this mistake corrected you mixed up the son's life and the 4 years diophantus grieved him
yes later I can multiply it to the actual age of Diophantus
oh I thought it will be x = 1/6
no
x is the number of years diophantus lived in all
if you said x = 1/6 it would mean diophantus lived only two months and died an infant
okay I understand does x will all be applied to this?
no, the letter x won't appear in all of these entries, but it'll appear in most of them.
but that info won't really help you all that much.
childhood x/6
youth x/12
bachelor x/7
Marriage before son 5
Son's death 4
Grief of son's death x/2 father's final age
I see that also includes
also you're once again mixing up the son's lifetime and the grief...
which won't matter THAT much but yknow. it's weird.
is the father's half the final age means the father of diophantus?
oki
yeah ok so like
5 years after his Marriage
oh sorry are you gonna argue against me on this or what
no I thought of you for me to answer the question
communication is difficult.
anyway! we now have the following breakdown of diophantus' life:
childhood = x/6
youth = x/12
bachelorhood = x/7
marriage before son = 5
son's life = x/2
grief of son's death = 4
---------------------------
total life = x
can you write this as an equation? Y/N
yes, but not sure if I will be correct
try it and i will tell you where you went wrong
since of all of the given denotes the total of Diophantu's life, I think I should only add all of them and solve for x
the LCM of childhood youth and bachelor is 84
just
write down
the equation
don't attempt to simplify it beforehand
you haven't written it down so you're trying to keep it all in your head
that's a bad idea bc you are guaranteed to fuck it up one way or another and not even know it
I don't think I can write in an equation but I already understood the problem
those two statements contradict each other
x/6 + x/12 + x/7 = 33x
if you understand the problem, then you are also ab-
33x????
where did 33x come from?
I multiplied it by 84 to remove the fraction
and you chose not to write down this multiplication by 84 on the left-hand side.
and instead chose to claim that a number is equal to 84 times itself.
that's their common lcm
FORGET about this "common lcm" bullshit.
you have only half-written down the equation.
i TOLD you NOT to simplify anything beforehand.
NOT simplifying anything beforehand also means NOT thinking about any denominators or lcm's or any such things.
ping me when you respond.
x/6 + x/12 + x/7
I really don't know how to put it into equation
@paper depot
you've written it down halfway
you've accounted for three of the six parts of diophantus' life; are you going to also account for the other three, or let them fall into oblivion?
5x+4x = x/2
congratulations you fucked up once again
you attempted to simplify some things, didn't you?
and you also lost the first bit.
I kinda solve it my head at the same time
DO NOT DO THINGS IN YOUR HEAD.
don't attempt to simplify it beforehand
you haven't written it down so you're trying to keep it all in your head
that's a bad idea bc you are guaranteed to fuck it up one way or another and not even know it
the equation i wanted from you was: $$\frac{x}{6} + \frac{x}{12} + \frac{x}{7} + 5 + \frac{x}{2} + 4 = x$$
Ann
very simple if you just don't overthink
I see just exactly adding them
Thank you so much for help I'm practicing this board exam problems
.close
Closed by @simple lark
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
need help with this
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin
2. I have begun but got stuck midway
3. I got an answer but I'm told it's wrong
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked
5. I have a question about someone else's worked solution
6. None of the above
ok the first thing i'd probably do is try to find h
yeah
Which triangle should we use
Shouldn’t we find the height of the triangle
So then we will get the hyp
You already have the hypotenuse
@severe violet Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @severe violet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
is A={1,2,3} and B={{1}} subsets?
My guess is no, as {1} is different from 1
subsets of what?
is B subset of A?
no, they aren't subsets of each other.
because B contains {1}, and {1} is not an element of A
and A contains 1,2,3 which are not elements of B
B is subset of A iff each element of B is also element of A
yes, sets can themselves be elements of other sets, it's perfectly fine
yes, {1} is element of e.g. {{1}} or {2, {1}, {3, 3}}
makes sense, So by this definition {1} element of B but not A, thus B not subset of A
thank you.
.close
Closed by @opal obsidian
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
wtf is this shape 😭 im so lost
its a hyperbola https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbola
use the definition of eccentricity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eccentricity_(mathematics)
yw
.close
Closed by @hidden ginkgo
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
I have a problem I solved it through but I was just wondering if I was doing it correctly
Problem: I = E/R+r
I’m I’m solving for r
$I = \frac{E}{R} + r$?
Ann
ok, so you should write E/(R+r)
Oh okay sorry
ok, so you have your solution and you're about to send it here to get it checked, yes?
Yes correct
This was the solution I got
I can show you my work to see if the answer is wrong and see where I went wrong to correct it
you should always show your work regardless
@mint crystal Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone texit bot this question for me please
$\frac{x^5+3x^4-2x^2-3}{x^2+1}$
_wherewolf_
is this what you want
ive tried it but im not sure where im going wrong
show your work please
so i want to see the working
It's a custom command that most people don't have, just Google a long division calculator if that's all you want
you wrote it weirdly and that's why you made a mistake
oh what
try writing it like - (x^5+0x^4+x^3) instead of -x^5+0x^4+x^3
you made a mistake at -(-3x^3+0x^2-3x)
it should be +3x on the next line
so remainder is 3x?
yeah
hi
hello
It's fine everyone makes mistakes
.close
Closed by @reef wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ABC is a right triangle, right angled at B.
D can be any point on AC (other than A and C)
Find the length of BD (integer values)
so you want to find all possible integer values of BD?
it seems like you would have to create a function for it and then find where the values of function are integers ig
hmm
the way my friend did it was
function could be with respect to AD:DC ratio or theta, theta = angle DBC I think
minimum value of BD
is that a yes or a no
Ohhh
if it's a no, then no goal has been clearly stated.
Find minimum value of BD ?
Yep
so then we are to find all possible integer values of BD, got it
we will need to find the minimum possible value for that
which of course happens when BD is perpendicular to AC
and so can be found using the half-base-times-height area formula, perhaps
really?
if BD is perpendicular to AC
then answer comes out to be 14.5
but that isnt right
of course it isn't. i didn't say it was the smallest integer value.
but it's the lower bound.
word of advice:
never
ask "what's the answer" on this server
it is like a red cloth to a bull
anyway in our case we then know that if BD is an integer then it must be at least 15

@paper depot hey you done?
@plain bear Has your question been resolved?
@plain bear Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@plain bear the question is to calculate lenght BD ?
ok
minimum length of BD
if you take (BC) as x-axis and (BA) as y-axis
then you find the equation of line (AC)
then you have coordinates of D and you can calculate BD², then find when BD² is minimum
but in your SS, it is not said to find the minimum of BD, but to find BD
@latent girder Has your question been resolved?
hmm
ty @latent girder
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help me with this problem; I tried but it appears that something went wrong.
so in inductive step, I supposed the statement is true with n positive numbers x1, x2, ..., x_n-1, x_n + x_n+1 s.t sum <= 1/3 , simultaneously It True for n+1 positive numbers cause sum <= 1/3 but the product does contain equal sign.
<@&286206848099549185>
@tidal iron Has your question been resolved?
@tidal iron Has your question been resolved?
I couldnot solve with induction but bernoullis inequality works for this inequality (1+x1)...(1+xn)> or egual to 1+x1+...+xn if xi>-1 and they are all positive or negative
You can let xi=-yi and -1/3< or equal to y1+y2+...+yn then you can prove the (1+y1)...(1+yn)>1+y1+...+yn> or equal to 2/3
@tidal iron Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello there I have a question in regards to the Sandiwch Theorem. Lets say we want to find the limit as x approaches 0 of the function xsin(1/x). We know that x oscillates between [-1,1], therefore we can state that
-1 <= sin(1/x) <= 1
-x <= xsin(1/x) <= x
But now we have an issue because when we graph it we see that it does not abide the definition of sandwich theorem where f(x) <= g(x) <= h(x)
Now if we apply an absolute value, we get.
-|x| <= |xsin(1/x)| <= |x|
Now we cannot change the original function and it can be proved through cases that - |x| <= xsin(1/x) <= |x|
Now what my confusion is from that transition where we had that absolute value on xsin(1/x) to getting it removed after proving the cases. I don't get how to prove those cases. if someone can hint me along the way as I attempt to show my thinking and advise me so on and so forth it would be greatly appreciated.
"it does not abide by the definition of sandwich theorem where..."
Why not?
Sandwich theorem does work on that line.
The final definition does what I was saying
was that this
-x <= xsin(1/x) <= x
itself
does not abide the sandwich theorem. An exception has been made for that thing.
As x approaches 0 for the limit.
Why not lol
-x can be bigger than xsin(1/x).
thus f(x) <= g(x) doesn't hold.
Yeah.
Oh I see. Could do a right limit and left limit instead
Might be the "through cases" you were referring to
Yeah
-|x| <= |xsin(1/x)| <= |x|
Now this is correct, however we negate the absolute value case through proving cases and also because of the fact we cannot change the og function in the middle or were essentially changing it which would be wrong.
Please don't tell me the answer
but here is my thinking
We need to prove that x < 0 and x >= 0
therefore
You're correct that |xsin(1/x)| is not the original function, but there's still useful information in using that function instead
For x >= 0 - |x| < xsin(1/x) = |x|
and -x < 0
-|x| = -xsin(1/x) < |x|
Does this prove the fact that we can drop the absolute value on the |xsin(1/x)|
Or am I missing a detail, and if so hint me towards it don't tell me directly.
hello?
Hey you there?
ello?
There's two different ways to prove this. Using the absolute value, or using the left side and right side
Mk, so I used the left side and right side right to prove mine? Is my proof incomplete?
So we can exhaust the cases on the left and right hand side to prove my point. Or I could place an absolute value in the middle and just observe what would happen.
@broken nimbus Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello again
yaomri
So you're trying to solve this for y right?
yes basically we want yprime(1)
Oh ok
This is a separable differential equation so we can just factor y' to one side
yes so y' = 1/??
y'=x/(1-1/y)
kk wait
here is the original
$g\left(x\right)\ =\ x+\ \frac{1}{x+\frac{1}{x+\frac{1}{x+...}}}$
yaomri
I have to calculate g prime (1)
Oh ok
I'm a beginner
Hmmm... I'll try
Yeah I know that
$y'=\frac{x}{1-\frac{1}{y}}$
_wherewolf_
I got $y^\prime=\frac{\sqrt{x^2+4}\pm x}{2\sqrt{x^2+4}}$
math_is_fun
Well hailey said it wasnt quite right
umm we just need g(1)
the answer is (5+sqrt(5 )) /10 = g prime 1
to find g'(1)
they just dont show how they did it
from my souvenirs it was y prime = xy something
So from that $g^\prime(1)=\frac{5\pm\sqrt{5}}{10}$
math_is_fun
you isolate y' to the left side
First $y=x+\frac{1}{y}$
Then $y=\frac{x\pm\sqrt{x^2+4}}{2}$
math_is_fun
Then $y^\prime=\frac{\sqrt{x^2+4}\pm x}{2\sqrt{x^2+4}}$
math_is_fun
The question is
how did you get from y = x + 1/y to that
like what formula did you uuse
is the answer even right?
Yeah
it couldn't be -
since we ant g(1)
g prime
so 1 +5
sqrt(5)
1+4*
- 5
waitt
the /10 where is it?
Multiply the numer and denomin by sqrt(5)
2 x sqrt(5)
The last question is that how do we know the answer is $\frac{5+\sqrt{5}}{10}$ and not $\frac{5-\sqrt{5}}{10}$
oh the numer
math_is_fun
since it's on quadran 1
g(x) reminds me of the golden ratio
i'd say +
wait lemme do it
btw from x / (1- 1/y)
for the quadratic formula
how do you know where is b ,a c
What is b ,a c?
the quadratic formula
Ok
I think I just found a reason
How did you get that?
well what did you use
Shouldn't it be y=x+1/y?
yes but it's still not a degree 2 equation
$y=x+\frac{1}{y}\implies y^2=xy+1\implies y^2+(-x)y+(-1)=0$
math_is_fun
I found another reason
yea?
So the $y=\frac{x-\sqrt{x^2+4}}{2}$ is always negative
math_is_fun
But g(x) can be positive
hm
Here's a summary of everything:
$$y=g\left(x\right)\ =\ x+\ \frac{1}{x+\frac{1}{x+\frac{1}{x+...}}}$$
gives $y=x+1/y$. Using the quadratic formula yields
$$y=\frac{x\pm\sqrt{x^2+4}}{2}.$$
But the $-$ solution is always negative, which is not the case for $g$. Differentiating gives
$$y^\prime=\frac{\sqrt{x^2+4}+ x}{2\sqrt{x^2+4}},$$
so
$$g^\prime(1)=\frac{\sqrt{5}+1}{2\sqrt{5}}=\frac{5+\sqrt{5}}{10}$$
math_is_fun
This one, not 5
oh yes
but if you time back at the num
the squares cancel
don't they?
oh nvm got it
got it got it
thank you man for helping
appreciate it
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @pulsar sun
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this what it wants me to do? To draw a graph right?
yes
Closed by @plush shoal
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, i was doing some practice problems that were given to us about Taylor Series Expansion. The attached image is the function about a = -3
I manage to get this answer
but the textbook's answer key says that the denominator should have a times 6 (so it says that the denominator should be 6•3^(n+4)
How can I proove : a ≡ d mod m
Given that,
a ≡ b mod m
and c ≡ d mod m
stop spamming
!help
Please read #❓how-to-get-help
based on the pattern that I got, i dont know how that 6 got there so I dont know if the textbook has a wrong solution or im just dumb asf
@low turret Has your question been resolved?
I am too lazy to calculate f^(n)(x) can you show your step?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
this is personal HW but can someone help me
there is 1 coin and 1 dice for context
I dont understand
there should be one way
its like a type right?
*typo
whats the original question?
I know how do do it
its easy
I juast diont get what was meant
in the since statement
@modest aurora
oh its not a typo
oh ignore the last message wrong server 😦
rlly what happened
so its the common of all 3
cards, dices and coins
for cards there is 52/4
wait
omfg
wait
yea no i dont understand this shit
i was thinking 2x2=4
so 52/4 gets cancelle by 4 and only 52 remains
but probability for dice is 1/6
i think its a typo
👍
nah dont
ita finwe thx
same toy you
@thorny mica Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could I get confirmation on my answee
Looks good
Ty
Could you also confirm one more thing, someone one else did but I just wanna make sure
Sure
190 is closer to 170 than 10 is, sure, but that's not necessarily relevant
cos 530° is also equivalent to cos 170° so distance isn't exactly a relevant metric
But 190 is correct
this is correct
Np
i literally computed the values for you
i would think the engine is enough confirmation
@white coral Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with this?
@neon mango Has your question been resolved?
Give it your best shot
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Why did they minus theta?
to be honest, from reading these alone, I don't know.
Can you show part I and the whole question
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
Oh sorry my bad
i think it's because of BA
draw a straight line on B and parallel to real axis
then consider the angle between line and BA
then we can find that the angle is pi/3-theta
@vast shale Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hi
I have a quick question
Can a matrix be positive definite if it is not symmetric?
Or must it be symmetric?
I know there's a formula but its for like all x in R^n that isnt 0
so im not sure how to test that case for nonsymmetric matrices exactly
without brute forcing to find a failure
x . y (dot product of x and y) = x1y1 + ... + xnyn >= 0 for all real values of x and y.
So if x . y = 0 then either x or y = 0 for the dot product to = 0.
If x = 0 then //x + y // = sqrt(y x y) = y
//x - y// = sqrt(-y x -y) = y
If Y = 0 then // x + y // and //x - y // becomes // x //
I can't put the double lines because discord hides it
and it gets confusing
Idk how to use latex 
😎
@sudden cape Has your question been resolved?
@sudden cape Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Find all values of the parameter (a \in R) for which the following inequality is valid for all (x \in R):
[1+log_5(x^2+1) \geq log_5(ax^2+4x+a)]
If the range of values of a can be expressed in the form of (A, B], then find the value of A + B.
So 1 can be represented as (log_5(5)), afterwards we use the logarithm addition to product thingy and finally get (5(x^2+1) \geq ax^2+4x+a) which can be represented as ((a-5)x^2+4x+(a-5) \leq 0). We get one equation here and another one is just due to property of log that (ax^2+4x+a > 0). After that, to proceed I have to use the discriminant inequalities, as per the solution we take (D \leq 0) in the first equation, and also (D < 0) in the second equation. I don't understand why, I took (D \geq 0) in both equations assuming the roots to be real due to the inequality and got a different answer.
usopper.
Why should the roots be complex, because that is the only situation when we take D less than 0 right
usopper.
@cosmic gust Has your question been resolved?
@cosmic gust Has your question been resolved?
@cosmic gust Has your question been resolved?
don't see a problem here
if you take D>=0 and D>0 you won't get any a
the answer should be (2; 3]
You do. [-2,2] U [3,7]
Same answer as before, but it isn't the correct one. What is the reasoning behind taking D < 0
When you take D<0 we find parabola that has no solution
if parabola is looking up then D<0 will get parabola that has values bigger than zero
Yeah, I get it now. You want it to be above or below the x-axis depending upon the inequality, otherwise it wouldn't be satisfied (>0 or <0 inequality in this case). So D cannot be > 0, correct?
you get a є null set
yes
there is no such point a that will belong to each region
Oh my god
How did I not see that...
True
That is some insane tunnel vision from my side lol, thanks. It is crystal clear now
.close
Closed by @cosmic gust
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello, i dont understand how to do this at all. sorry, but can someone help me guide through this so i can understand it please?


welp