#help-13
428200 messages · Page 474 of 429
why the lol
hav u taken abstract alg
i had something like that in my year 1
yes
is it fun
depends on whether you like algebra?
do you?
Just looking at the titles of the lectures for the abstract algebra half, that's pretty hardcore for undergraduates, let alone freshmen... https://canvas.harvard.edu/courses/75936/assignments/syllabus They even get to do some character theory!
lecture 1 is groups
personally i don't have much of an intuition for algebra, so i only did groups through modules and fields, and some lie algebra, and stopped
Good grief, I didn't even know this fact about non-abelian finite groups, that at most 5/8ths of the possible pairs of elements commute, and that inequality is sharp.
That's on homework 2
ironically i found rings horrible, but lie algebras quite exciting, though maybe part of that is because the lecturer was much faster
i’m doing chad’s final exam
can i simply leave the key insights down
i don’t want to work out concrete values 😦
that actually looks really fun
Yeah, now it looks fun, after I've already taken two courses in group theory. As a freshman I would have run screaming.
what's the prereqs for this class?
I think no formal prereqs, just "Mathematics 55a is an intensive course for students who are comfortable with abstract mathematics."
guys what would be the normal progression for a first year math major
like calc 3 / diff eq / lin alg -> then what
I think I would have enjoyed something at about half this pace, actually, this just seems way too intense, especially if you're taking 4-5 other classes at the same time
my course load in my very first sem, was five courses each covering the equivalent contents of four semesters
that pattern carried on to the second sem
Yikes, did you ever sleep?
4 hours of sleep for a whole year?
no, for two semesters
winter and summer break, what do you think i spent time doing?
sleeping and in winter break, prep work
Winter and spring break would have called for hibernation with a schedule like that 😁 And I guess some video games
for the first one, notice $\sin^2x = \frac{1 - \cos 2x}{2}$. everything is simple afterwards
Chromium
yep
you ain't wrong, i watched a crap ton of anime to destress
fot the second, $\frac{1}{x^3 + x^2 + x} = \frac{1}{x} - \frac{x + 1}{x^2 + x + 1}$.
Chromium
second one you might actually wanna just finsh
everythnig should also be simple
cuz its not very hard
linear/quadratic -> break it into two integrals, one with u sub one with trig sub
but yeah in essence that's it
but PFD would be easier than the integrals themselvesl ol
x^2 + x + 1 i doubt you can do PFD 
this is just an observation
ik. you already did PFD (the easy part) and you skipped the hard part (the integrals)
how are the integrals hard
they rnt but would be more challenging then just algebraic PFD
anyways what did you get for next Q
2?
2a just average the tip and tail of the line segment.
this has four lines of symmetry right
this channel is occupied.....
oh ok
the integrals should correpond to this
how do i get help
❓how-to-get-help
❓how-to-get-help❓how-to-get-help
❓how-to-get-help
anyway
2b, just sum some rectangles, some triangles, and a semicircle
2c: F'(5) = 4
2d: it's the perimeter of the semicircle
it'd be better to work out the specific values if intending to assess yourself
For example this one :o it's not really finished with that
chad, what's the time allotted for the exam?
2hrs?
3?
paper like this, no more than 2 hours, but 90 minutes feels more likely
camieee 2hrs is okay lol
...where i'm at, 60 to 75 minutes for this kind of paper is expected y'know
i'm being kind with 90 HAHA
yeah i think the TA's period would be around 90 mins
but that would be if he was taught all this stuff in a class and prepared for this final (which he wasn't)
so i think 2 hours is fine
2 hours is fine if chromie was actually writing down the full solutions and not...y'know
also, i'm looking at 55a and 55b and now i wish i took it hnnng
I believe chromie should realllyyyy write the answers at least
@gentle lintel Has your question been resolved?
2 d) I believe is also a fun one :o
.
._. what's the answer for 1 b)
lmao
not even joking you can scroll up lol
more like, if you really wanna assess but also haste through it, just give us the answers and spare the solution lol
true but he just wanted to make sure he got all the big picture concepts
i believe integral of (linear)/(quadratic) is easily generalisable
do it.
so yea, won’t dwell on that lol
$\int \frac{ax+b}{cx^2+dx+e}$
Shuri 4 honorable (Yottachad)
generalize this
lmfao
it would take a while but it might be fun?
basically, split it into two integrals
one doable with u sub (int (cx + dx + e))/(cx + d + e)
lot of constants you would have to work with however
the other with trig sub
trig sub? you mean formula
(it won’t, it’ll be boring)
$\int \frac{1}{u^2 + a^2} = \frac{1}{a}\tan^{-1}\qty(\frac{u}{a})$
this one is good to know IMO
Shuri 4 honorable (Yottachad)
this is the only one i have memorized
and the integral of ln(x) cuz that one shows up a lot (and its not super standard)
yea
for 3, solid of revolution in terms of y coordinates
goes from -√3 to √3, 4 - y² - 1² is the integrand i believe
for 4, only (b) is true, i think
(based on the given information)
5 involves work stuff, i’m not familiar
6b, i don’t know what a centroid is
for 6a, (√(1 - (y - 2)²/4), y) are on the given part of the ellipse
one can easily craft a solid of revolution formula
center of mass
(nor do i know that ;-;)
not doing very well on this final so far 😐
LOL
(rough work, if anyone’s interested)
(have i provided incorrect answers/approaches)
time's not over yet and we don't have all your answers either
cheating not allowed lol
i didn’t cheat
i'll 🤐 until you're done
(8, 9 involve diff eq, i haven’t touched those either ;-;-;-;)
here’s 10a
,rotate
2+C turns jnto C
10a(ii)can be done using IBP, and this result
we really don't have any answers so I'm not sure how anyone's supposed to grade lol
chromium, are you really that averse to solving the paper?
i, too, would like to read full solutions when grading
believe me, there's a reason why i rather enjoy giving zeroes to incomplete scripts
coz if so, I'd like to do proceed things your way, adding a "how?" to all your methods so far :o
Camil's getting paid in handing out zeros to chromi
lmao
XD
btw 7 can also be done by hyperbolic cosh / sinh
few things to notice
sinh^2-cosh^2 = 1
d/dx sinh(x) = cosh(x) and d/dx cosh(x) = sinh(x)
and that cosh(x) is just e^x's even part, and sinh being e^x's odd part
that is.
cosh(x) = (e^x+e^-x)/2 and sinh(x) = (e^x-e^-x)/2
ikr 😮
oh, are we grading already?
yea i noticed that
10b is done by induction, but i’m stuck in some int (int f dx) dx situation
it’s a 4 point problem, even lower than q1
i believe i’m overlooking something obvious
well, that's an exam for you
welp, 20 minutes left and we still don't have any answers from you
i’m struggling to do 10b
lmao
@dire geode just point out my mistakes
i’ll attempt another paper later
we literally can't lmao, no one's got any clue what you did
Can I? can I? can I?
🥺 👉 👈 pweaseee
.
you go ahead, i got an integration bee in a week to judge and have my own fun
MIT integration bee?
integration bee 
nah, knockoff of MIT's
Answer (1 of 3): I was the Grand Integrator in 2012 and 2013. The integration bee is a very interesting competition, and its kind of the perfect competition for me. It seems like the people who win are not necessarily the people who are going to be great research mathematicians, but the people wh...
does sound fun
$\int \frac{e^x}{\ln x} \dd{x}$
Amen.
But I soon learned that it's much harder to do calculus in the front of the room when the pressure is on.

Lol
i was right!
a u sub gets you that nice
$\int \frac{e^{e^u} \cdot e^u}{u} \dd u$
Shuri 4 honorable (Yottachad)
Indeed it was: the integrand was simply the derivative of x² secx.
those moments when your familiarity with integrals and the practice pays off
.
.
.
kept telling myself, don't fuck up at the beginning, because there's so little margin of error on the easier integrals.
damn, int bee looks scawy
ntm, JEE calculus papers are scawy enough
i don't like that type of competition tbh
i like the type where i can sit down for five hours and do five questions
me imagining chromi interrogating about the proof for distributive property of determinants
Did you finish the paper?
calc1-2 stuff
this is the bonus question
which is
everything i think i’m able to do, yea
Prove that $\frac{x}{1+x^2} < \tan^{-1}(x) < x \text{ } \forall x \in \mathbb{R}^+$
FAILED TO RENDER
lmao
Shuri 4 honorable (Yottachad)
where do i see problems
how about 1 question for 5 hours
my guess. i think its pi^2/6
scroll down to access previous year problems
answer
Help me create more free content! =)
https://stemerch.com/
https://www.patreon.com/mathable
https://papaflammy.myteespring.co/
Merch :v - https://papaflammy.myteespring.co/
https://www.amazon.com/shop/flammablemaths
https://shop.spreadshirt.de/papaflammy
Become a Member of the Flammily! :0 https://www.youtub...
or 1 question throughout your life: $$\text{Prove collatz conjecture.}$$
least i got the pi^2 right
everyone QED lmao
Prove that $$\text{all nontrivial zeros of the } \zeta(s) \text { function have a real part of } \frac 12.$$
Shuri 4 honorable (Yottachad)
+300 iq + $1,000,000
lmao
how do we incorporate calculus
How did you do this one?
integrals/derivatives
and being REALLY smart with the inequalities
$\int_0^{2\pi} \sin^2 \theta \dd{\theta}$
or sinx = (e^ix - e^-ix)/2 
lmao
then does it become a complex integral
double angle
nah
consider cos 2x
no contour integral!/
$=\int_0^{\pi} (1 - \cos 2\theta) \dd{\theta}$?
/2
i find myself amused
alright
Camil tomorrow: automatic 0/100 for chromi. no cheating allowed
something like that
wdym something like that?
WHAT?????
integral is then solved easilt
sin²x = (1 - cos² x)/2?
ahem
now its correct
okay umm
I still don't understand what's wrong with $$=\int_0^{\pi} (1 - \cos 2\theta) \dd{\theta}$$
i haven’t checked the bound changes and all
he already accounted for the bounds i think
but this is the main insight to solving
is the area from 0 to pi = to the area from pi to 2pi?
yes
aight
next ??
what did we do with this I wonder :o
Holy pain
i told someone
1/x - (x + 1)/(x² + x + 1) is the main insight
wrong
chromium pfd'd it and then called the rest trivial
0 for this one ig :/
RIP that's like
is this wrong lol
10% of the test right there
Yeah
i don’t think it is
How is that wrong
It is
or am i failing algebra
You're failing English lmao
chromi tomorrow: axiom of choice, the rest is trivial
It is not the main insight
乾脆不用英文算了
😟
there, for those with ocd
so umm
...is chromie suddenly chinese?

nope, it's still not the main insight
it is to me
no matter what you do :/
Nope
I love this
genius
if he were, he'd be doing better on this exam
could you explain how you plan to do $$\int \frac{x+1}{x^2 + x + 1}$$ ?
yea
HAHAHA
Lmao
Integral of form linear/(quadratic) or (px+q) / (ax^2 + bx + c) dx
LOL
generalisation here
but do you know how to do that?
i’m too lazy to explain
Vertex form on the denominator
oh right :o
until and unless i have some proof you know how to do it, i will still give a 0
it's grading
no hard feelings
and you do some shits to obtain arctan and log
0 for this one, yeah
(at this point i could just copy from the sent video and you wouldn’t know, so 0 me i guess)
but i just looked it up
-100% cheating
why?
so how do you feel about your assessment so far
not bad
i fail enlgihs
uhh
umm?
what's the average of "f" defined as anyways
1/2???
i could do an integration
yea
1/(b - a) int f [a, b]
oh wait yeah
this is the intended way
(i’m too lazy for that either, sorry)
yea
so uhh
$\phi \leq \int f \leq \ksi$
I'd like an answer to 2b.
what's $$\int_0^{10} \abs{f(x)} \dd{x}$$
u wot
can't read (@_@;)
poor attitude, honestly
sorry 😦
it got colder here
and i can’t type
or write in a neat way
i mean if you insist, i will
i just don’t want to
welp, if that's the case, we can leave at that ig... and here's a trivial assessment to your attitude with calculus:
$$\int 1 \cdot (\ln x)^k \dd{x} = (\int \dd{x}) (\ln x)^k - \int x [(\ln x)^k]' \dd{x}$$
?
ah nm
integration by parts?
i read it wrong
my version of IBP is $$\int u\cdot v \dd{x} = \qty(\int u) v - \int \qty(\int u) v' \dd{x}$$
lol
thought he randomly switched order of dx and lnx^k
Ansh wants to insert as many integral signs as possible in all his formulas
today, integration by parts
then again its almodt 1 am
same
tomorrow, Abel's partial summation
i hav excuse

Abel's death
not really 😑 it's just easier to recognize stuff
at least less confusing than: $$\int u \dd{v} = \ldots$$ or whatever it is
recognize $\int$tuff
riemann
no one knows
Yessir, recognize int stuff
everyone usess DI / tabular
DI = holy grail
so umm 👀
I feel like I made myself pretty clear but, I feel like Chromi's pretty not-comfy with the fundamentals of calculus
wait for other assessments
[that's just my personal opinion]
that’s a long wait
integrals are just puzzles
@dire geode 👀 what do you think?
Also considering every doubt chromi's ever have in last couple days
probably need to do at least 100 integrals and struggle to identify when to use trig sub, ibp, u-sub, partial fractions
try giving me another one
lol
I'd suggest
that plus at least a 50-60 decent limit questions, [and a decent fluency with FTC questions]
additionally, you need to do them to completion on your own
asking for help occasionally is fine
link is super skecth lookin
so theres a picture of it
its BPRP's 100 integrals
100 integrals for calculus 1, calculus 2, and AP Calculus students. Integration techniques included: integration by parts, DI method, reverse power rule, u-substitution, trigonometric substitution, integration by substitution, integration by partial fraction decomposition, trigonometric integrals, and more. #calculus #微積分
😃 Update with Lars (st...
oops with the number there (@_@;)
where do i get his wallpaper 😐
i’ve tried those as well
60%?
what do you mean "tried" ?
hmmm
i have looked through all 90 and i have methodologies for about 85 of them in my head offhand
nucleus
ntm, there's another set of at least 500+ integrals in my additional sheet
that does not mean i actually tried them
"i've read all the problems and i know either to do: u-sub, trig-sub, ibp, partial fractions, or guess and check. therefore i've tried them all"
this is the best descriptoin
ive ever heard
,w random number 1-100
q2?
god dammit
go chromi
jesus christ
that's the hardest one ive seen so far
harmonic addition formula
(didn't know how to do it immediately)
tf is this ?
wtf is that
type less, write more
LOL
camil
latex solutions also welcome
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
Wolfram Alpha doesn't understand your query!
Perhaps try rephrasing your question?
Click here to refine your query online
cringe
"You can, for example, never foretell how one integral works, but you can say with precision what an average number will be up to. Individuals vary, but percentages remain constant. So says the statistician" - Sherlock Holmes (censored version)
yes, but it's better known at high school level as the R-formula
ah this shit : acos(x) + bsin(x) = Acos(x+phi)
🚶♂️
yes that shit
de le te
no way you can do that with harmonic whatever formula
🤦♂️
porque del?
lmfao
if chromium is workin on that
he isn't being distracted by this
cuz that would take a while
chromium i c you
therefore you are not doing the integral
disappointed
😦
Idek if we're done with concluding the $$\lim_{x \to -\infty} \qty(1 + \frac{1}{x})^x = e$$ discussion
yooo
:/
no triangle inequality either
(but now you do?)
yes using papa weirstrass
wait this isn't 1/e ?
👀 isn't it just... :whispers:
no lmao
hell nah
nah i could see where hes coming from
cuz if you let u = -x
then you would get the 1/-u in the inside
yeah lol
and that looks like 1/e.... but its not cuz -u in the power
so whole thing to the power of -1 and then you get 1/(1/e) = e
would be more insight-ful if you visited the working of the limit
"1/e is close enough to e, i understand it enough" --chromi, probably
well cya guys, ima do physics
cya
lmfao
(applaud me. or not.)
Byee
yes, papa weirstrass
illegitim- (coughs)
show your work for 14
$\int \sin(x^2)dx$
Shuri 4 honorable (Yottachad)
Shuri 4 honorable (Yottachad)
tangent half angle
if you're done with 41. I'll check if there's a more fun one that I seem to recall
what is your final answer?
you write 3 words down Camil's gonna give you 3 words of her own "what. the. f"
u = x - 1
hmm
$$\int \frac{\sqrt{u+2}}{\sqrt{u}} \dd{u}$$ Now what??
$\sqrt{u} + \sqrt{2} = \sqrt{u+2}$ maybe?
surely ig :o
well, if you're done with this one as well, you're welcome to try: $$\int \sqrt{\frac{x - 3}{2 - x}} \dd{x}$$
jesus
I'm amazed you realized. But your current study discipline doesn't depend majorly on your fluency with integrals but rather the basic stuff like how to evaluate a limit, what mistakes to avoid when differentiating/integrating, etc. and mainly the very definitions of couple stuff, and the fundamentals is exactly where I find you lacking.
wdym mistakes to avoid
no comment
we're not done with the last three ones ig?
so what have i achieved
in calculus
are you able to provide comment?
well how to do everything for sure
but prob a little less of the general "ideas" behind the stuff
such as epsilon delta definitoin of limits
riemann sums to derive all the arclength / volume formulas
(i’ve seriously done everything in my power to strengthen the fundamentals, the definitions, and so on.)
(if that’s not enough, i don’t know what is)
i think you've done pretty well my friend
but just look into some of the derivations
(considering how most, i assume, cover these in a matter of weeks)
to get a better grasp
look, maybe i'll give you an anecdote, which so happens to be a true story that happened to me in my very first week of school
so i wanted to test into this advanced calculus class, because it's advanced calculus and i was pretty confident i could take it
famous last words, but that's not the point
damn ansh, the truth hurts
to study for that test, which i was only told about 24 hours in advance about, i decided to hey let's read and understand limits and derivatives and stuff, and i did that in three hours, covering limits and riemann sums and basic derivatives and FTC
the problem is, i found a mock test after those three hours, and i had exactly zero clue how to do shit
i knew all the definitions and theorems, and that's the problem: that's all i knew
all those little nitty gritty that comes up in the process of solving problems, i didn't have a clue
hey i’ve got an ancedote too
how to write a proper argument for why $\sum \frac{1}{ne^n} < \infty$, no bloody clue
uhh
Camilleone
so i had to spend a lot of time re-learning everything, but this time making sure i did stuff properly, step by step, and that's how i finally learned calculus, properly
this anecdote would surely be nice words of caution for me
Yeah, there are some things you can only learn in practice
should i share my ancedote lol
And at some point you need to get the hang of it
As Ben Finegold once said, theory and practice are the same thing in theory, but not in practice
here, i spent the summer of 2019 attempting all sorts of integral techniques, limit techniques, then i attempted to move on to calc3
yea, waste of time and here i am again
Well, what else would you say if you find someone constantly questioning interesting questions, that one would probably not even expect from a, say top rank scorer in hs, only to later find out that this person substitutes x = 0 to find the indeterminate form of (sin x)/x and writes 1/x should have an undefined form?
oh i’ve never said that
or tried things similar
i don’t think i expressed myself correctly
remember that stackexchange thing i sent
that you said was a ‘good finding’
i sent that because i completely agree with the top answer, and if you did agree with the top answer it would be pretty embarrassing, for me at least
and that happened so uhh
hahahahaha oh shit i remember this
let me clarify picture 1 lol
no thanks
oh wow
i must have missed that early part
i need context on this
don't you have like 190 integrals to do?
through direct substitution, if you obtain 0/0, it’s indeterminate (which means whether the limit exists or not cannot be immediately determined)
you haven't even sent us your answer to
oh yea i’ll try that tonight
this is all
Oh that looks like a rancid integral
is it wrong?
or to $\int \sqrt{\frac{x+1}{x-1}} \dd{x}$
but oh well
that also looks like it sucks
if this isn’t wrong, yea it’s just communication problems i believe
unfortunately for you, communication is important in math
and i’d rather that said instead of a complete lack on fundamentals
:/ if I'm not misunderstanding your understandings of the concept, you're mistaken ^^"
yea, engaging in this server helps improving communication
(proceeds to spiral into an infinite loop)
two things can both be right
Like the one fine example I love: $$\frac{\cancel{6}4}{1\cancel{6}} = \frac{4}{1}$$
:o
so what’s your verdict
(is this wrong anyway)
verdict on what?
Let's go through this one last time, so I rest in piece 
yea, i agree to this
I agree to this too.
you need training in everything
the highest priority is doing problems quickly
but I disagree when you use "direct substitution" to explain yourself
progress wise, i agree with this.
camil's anecdote should teach you that math is hard and you can't be lazy by skipping doing real work, no matter how tedious you think it is.
and that there's a "proper" step by step approach to learning
being all over the place won't help you

Additionally, this is the coverage for GRE Math Subject. You can't escape tedious calculus if you want to get an advanced math degree
something like this won’t work then, i presume
Assessing yourself...
just grab a paper from somewhere and try it 🤔
Lets see... judging by what youve done I think youve covered the A level/IB syllabus for Calc?
dunno about IB, but technically it's not really A level calc
at least, not the one i took
Ok, I feel like I covered this stuff in IB calc
The further maths calc paper might suit
it's more...bits and pieces of a year 1 sem 1 calc course, i think
yeah, that
sure you've learnt a bit but I'm concerned you've skipped a lot more important stuff too
maybe it's a nice time to revisiting them basics now... considering you must've practically matured from the pre-calc stage. enough to promote developing your insights into the basics
:/
For now try look up further math IB calculus past papers
thats where I feel you're at
If you want to gauge yourself
Might be hard to find them hmm
so kinda just
Prioritize:
Limits > Continuity > Differentiation > Integration
And if possible, find topic specific papers to help enhance your understandings, the way you've preferred since the start
i'd say a typical collection of year 1 sem 1 tutorials might work?
because, tutorials
Well one thing, I don't think chromium has the speed
because of a lack of familiarity/confidence to apply this stuff
speed of what
.
You guys were doing this earlier right?
If you're confident with integration, this can probably done in 5 mins
Or maybe im pointing at the wrong Q
whichever one you guys were doing
$\int 2^x \sin x \dd x$
Chromium
ibp
pretty sure 90% of calc students can recognize a product and say "ibp"
?
,w integral 2^x sin(x)
$I(1 + \frac{1}{(\ln 2)^3}) = Y \implies I = (1 + \frac{1}{(\ln 2)^3})Y$?
oh shit
Surely... gg
me neither. it's a 0
Chromium
then finish it off
what does this even say
highschoolelementary school maybe
FTFY
:o
I'm complaining about a lack of words/direction/explanation
that's technically rough work uh
technically rough grade 2/10
sure "oh yea"
Let's see you try something else as well ?
$$\int \sqrt{\frac{x - 3}{2 - x}} \dd{x}$$
becomes integral of secant cubed, i think
...
well, good luck substituting everything back :o
im out of practice, this would take me about 5-10 mins to figure out. I have no idea how to do it by looking at it rn, but I sure as hell wouldnt rely on a wiki article to do it
like wth is this
theres a wiki article devoted to everything
You should be able to do this on your own hopefully
theres wolfram, why do we need to integrate
you should be able to do this stuff by yourself
being lazy again
yep it's understandable... it really is a common one
if u have done it before
u shouldnt forget it in a hurry
Like at least remember how the integral is done
and then yes, perhaps you can skip it
Parts? substitution?
yea
i remember how
how
whats the first split for parts
you get the original integral
ok sure
now in the time you told us, you couldve done it heheh
it looks like a pain, but it rlly isnt
chromi's too advanced for ansh's problems
convinced.. moves forward
You need to be on this level of confidence for algebraic manipulation
$$\int \sqrt{\frac{x - 3}{2 - x}} \dd{x}$$
ahem
that's $\int \sqrt{\frac{x}{-x-1}} \dd x$
excuse me?
Chromium
do the trig sub
,w int sqrt(-x/(x+1)) dx
damn this handwriting is getting worse
Is that your answer?
i haven't worked it out yet
Also, even wolfram gave the wrong answer to this so ^^"
1/10
please reconsider
im confused how this is concluded
$u = x + 3$
Chromium
dont reuse the same damn letters
it should've been u but sacrificing the holy 'x' isn't worth it
i like how by asking us, we're indirectly helping chromi solve problems even though he wants to be assessed
.
do u realise you have to sub BACK after ur done with the integral
yea
(alright fine i'll work out the steps.)
$\int \sqrt{\frac{x - 3}{2 - x}} \dd x =\int \sqrt{\frac{u}{-u-1}} \dd u (u = x + 3)$
are u respond?
what's wrong with pencil and paper?
formatting
handwriting?
triggers my ocd (kinda, i dont have it)
you can't continue from here?
apparently becomes tan
is that virus free? (can I download?)
Chromium
$u = -\sec^2 t, du = -2 \sec^2 t \tan t$
And what's the trig substitution?
uh a trig substitution is a method for evaluating integrals involving trigonometric functions
ah shit
Chromium
ohhh :o I've failed several trig substitutions :c
lol
$-2 \int \sec^2 t \tan t \sqrt{\frac{-\sec^2 t}{\tan^2 t}} \dd t$
x = sin t apparently keeps giving me wrong answers in certain scenarios T_T
Chromium
sure, use the imaginary number :o
what the fuck
oh anyways, once you're done with this one, I'd like you to generalize a substitution for:
$$\int \sqrt{(x - \alpha)(\beta - x)^{\pm 1}} \dd{x}$$
Also, what you just did shouldn't have involved any imaginary numbers ^^" please don't joke with integration stuff
screams in german
ah yes
🏃
range problems, and domain problems
involving the absolue value
history repeats itself
oh yea
sfhsuifhs]fgdfg
fdg
df
g
dfg
arcsin
why did i take so long.
genius
man did i write that shit the wrong way round
I had a good example, but ill have to hunt for it
of where substitution and care are needed
👀
(discussing math with shuri while walking through a flower market was honestly one of the best experiences of my life)
$\int_0^{\infty} f\qty(x + \frac{1}{x}) \frac{\ln x}{x} \dd{x}$
ok don't
$u = \ln x, x \dd u = \dd x$
Chromium
what is f 
wow
oh nvm i did this integral with you ages ago
when u first learnt sub
:o
yea
what problem, if any, is being discussed right now?
this
what is known about f?
i think the final answer is in terms of f and x
nothing much really, but it'd be nice to add that "f" is continuous
i mean
with the wrong choice of f, you can and will end up with a divergent integral
for example?
f(t) = t
lul
you get int[0, +∞] (x + x^-1) log(x)/x dx
log 🤢
,w integrate (x + 1/x) (ln x)/x dx from 0 to infty
told you
how did you know it diverges (nice comparison test exercise)
the integrand behaves as log(x) at infinity
$f(x) \neq f(1/x)$ works?
works in what sense?
this condition doesn't at all guarantee that the integral converges
say, where'd this problem come from anyway?
my module :o
can you show its original statement there
i want to see it
cause i'm growing more than slightly suspicious of how you're presenting it
$\int^{\infty}_0 x f \qty(e^x + \frac{1}{e^x}) \ \dd x$ is a pretty neat form i obtained
Chromium
$I = \int_0^{\infty} f\qty(x + \frac{1}{x}) \frac{\ln x}{x} \dd{x}$ \ $$= \int_{\infty}^0 f\qty(\frac{1}{x} + x) \frac{x\ln x}{x^2} \dd{x}$$
you're not answering my question, ansh
do you or do you not have a picture of the problem as it was originally stated in your module?
I do
okay then would you please be so kind as to send it here
looks like its D lul
Also, the answer was A)
is nothing at all known about f?
x -> -x sub
then the integral becomes $\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} t f(e^t + e^{-t}) \dd{t}$
Ann
not 0?
which, assuming that f behaves nicely enough at infinity, would be 0 as the integral of an odd function over a symmetric interval.
but unless we know that f does indeed behave nicely at infinity (or even not at infinity - who knows, maybe it's so nasty it's non-integrable!), and the integral does converge (which, again, we aren't given),
we cannot say this integral even makes sense let alone converges
since the module was meant as a discussion for class... I'm certain sir discussed this through
of course it would be up to the student to notice such details, is why I planned to bring this up as a matter of subtlety when doing integration
not f(-x - 1/x) ln(-x)/x [inf, 0]??
x -> 1/x brilliantly gives the answer 0, but does it?
idk, im not paying 100% attention. Ansh what sorcery is this
you advised x -> -x substitution lol
oh nvm im blind
that's what chromi did
x -> 1/x
but as Ann mentioned, this depends on what's up with f(x) :o
ntm, you're also meant to assume that "I" is finite, to be able to play with the limit
btw, in case you're lost, the topic of discussion was Chromium's assessment on calculus... and having had discussions with Chromium on several occasions, I felt like revisiting the basics via questions would be the optimal choice for him before moving on to Linear Algebra for multivar
you don't really need calc directly for linear algebra
Linear Algebra for multivariable calc-
If I'm interpreting correctly, Chromium's intention is to proceed with multivariable calculus(!?)
the assessment is (probably) intended to gauge his understandings and if it's fine to move on.
so kinda do more questions
-> ok?
https://www.ibo.org/contentassets/7f6c7681e0b34fc8b0541c1229c7521d/gp5_mathssl2.pdf
perhaps i should try this 
ib further maths calculus past paper, as shuri suggested
vectors / matrices?
Just chill and devote yourself to questions for a while. Prioritize the order LCD(limit -> continuity -> differentiability), then Integration and do stuff accordingly, step by step, until you're able to properly arrive to the answer at least 7 out of 10 times



