#help-13
428200 messages · Page 436 of 429
Bleidorb
why am I not allowed to get rid of the absolute value sign?
because you can't just get rid of some part of the equation and expect it to be the same
that's like asking why the graph of x^2+4x+2 isn't the same as the graph of x^2
can't just get rid of 4x+2 and expect it to be the same
true
you can evaluate the absolute value, though...
through simplification
what is |-h|?
|-h| = h
= h
so your left hand limit is now...?
left hand limit is now some small number divided by negative number
that goes near 0
like, if we choose number 0.01 for h
refer to what you did here
then we get:
sqrt(0.01) / -0.01
for the left and right hand limits
it's still applicable
but now you have different equations
well one of them is different
left hand side limit:
0 / -0 = -infinity 🤔
?
you have $$\lim_{h \to 0^-} \frac{\sqrt{|-h|}}{-h}$$
a disappointing son
yes
which is $\lim_{h \to 0^-} \frac{\sqrt{h}}{-h}$
a disappointing son
so now just do what you did before, multiply both top and bottom by sqrt(h)
this time it's not the square root of a negative number though
and the h on the bottom is negative
Bleidorb
-1 / 0 = minus infinity
-1/0 doesn't equal -infinity, but the limit does
Bleidorb
so you mean this 🔼
$\lim_{h \to 0+} \frac{1}{\sqrt{h}} = \infty$
$\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{\sqrt{|h|}}{h}$ = does not exist
Bleidorb
yes
why is there a signum function?
am I doing this right?
do the same thing for this one, |h|=h, multiply by sqrt(h), simplify
Bleidorb
Now, I only need to know how they got this form lim h->0 (1/|h|sgn(h))
sgn(x) = x/|x| = |x|/x
is sqrt(|h|) = | |h| |
double absolute value?
$\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{1}{|h|sgn(h)}$
Bleidorb
they are not even equal?
I probably just have to ignore this, since this is not equal to the limit h->0 (sqrt(|h|)/h)
.closed
.close
Closed by @hot socket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
This is my last attempt on this problem. May someone please help me validate that it is indeed 0.07?
I've tried 0.69 & -0.69, also -7.
I plugged in 31 into dp/dx for b
then plugged in 32 into dp/dx for part c
31 = 2.24
32 = 2.1705
2.24 - 2.1705
@untold comet Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @untold comet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
May someone please help me solve this?
Do you know where to start @untold comet
@untold comet Has your question been resolved?
uh
use a calculator, i suppose
never thought of that thanks
🤡
i know how to do this with t he total cost but confused with the average cost
ok no i don't know
how to start this problem
@graceful karma
Wouldnt you just multiply it by 300 @untold comet
Yeah that sounds right
They don't specify exactly what they want but I assume its the marginal total cost
Not just the marginal cost of a single unit
side question since i just finished working this problem
and i get only one attempt
before it randomizes and i have to do it over again
it is inelastic
bc n < 1
but i don't know which inelastic to pick
Well if something is inelastic the demand wont change when the price changes right?
And if thats the case the total revenue would increase
Because price is increasing and demand is steady
u make way more sense than my textbook
Lemme double check though
Im not an econ type person
Yeah I think that checks out
so C
Yeah

Hmm
i can send pic of my work
genuinely don't know what i di dwrong
i realized what i did wrong
i did 100(-0.1) instead of 100(-0.2)
it's supposed to be -20e
lol...
Thatd do it
Oh
Yeah I randomly write stuff Im looking at or thinking about too
Like if Im typing to someone and I start thinking about something Ill just randomly type what Im thinking about
GAH
this is time consuming and i have 4 other classes kms
all this due friday
OK
back to the other question
Thats so annoying that it randomizes every time
right?
Does it at least tell you the answer to the old one?
nope
ok back to the avg cost question
so what i need to do is
multiply everything by 300
except c
or also c?
Well wouldnt you just multiply C by the number of products
Or do you mean both sides of the equation
I suppose you could do that
i get 90000e^x/300
If it makes more sense
ok i multipled
300c=90000e^x/300
now what
find the derivative?
since marginal cost?
then sub in 300?
Yeah
Id honestly just ignore the c
Its just there to show what the whole equation is
I would maybe write
T=90000e or whatever
Yeah
Yeah thats what I got
Ye
The same procedure but without the * # of goods ig?
Yeah
i plugged in 200 into x then calculated
and i got 200e
wait
u right
for some reason it was inputting 200 before everything when i pasted
:L
e^1 = 2.718
2.72
is that the answer??
i've tried 2.72 in the past and said it was wrong
??
Hmm what in the world
I see no reason why multiplying by the number of products wouldnt work
Theres no example in the book right?
<@&286206848099549185> who wants $20 helping me solve 4 derivatives problems
LOL
at this rate i'm screwed
Random image online of this problem 
It links to that super sketchy chegg website
yooooooo
Surely your textbook has some kinda thing for this
Maybe check the index for marginal cost or smthn?
|| <@&268886789983436800> this guy with the grinch pfp||
alr papa
i think i found it
one sort of like it
but part of the question ma-
this thing says total cost not average cost
papa how do we go from avg cost to total cost
I mean I can only imagine its multiplying by the number of products
Nothing else makes sense
Do you get infinite attempts
Maybe it was a rounding fluke in the system or smthn
Cause it should always be e * number of products
This calculus video tutorial provides a basic introduction into marginal cost and average cost. The marginal cost function is the first derivative of the total cost function. The average total cost is the total cost divided by the production level which represents the number of units. The marginal cost tells you the additional cost added to t...
I mean this guy has a tutorial on something similar
He basically just says that average cost = total cost / units produced
And that marginal cost is the derivative of the total cost
Which is what we did
@untold comet Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
find the derivative
i need help doing the derivative for this probglem
i dont know how to do it
you know the derivative of arcsin, right?
yes 1/sqrt(1-u)^2
so would you get yeah so like
(eh - ping me when you've got the answer pls)
what's u?
i mean x
you know how to rewrite a radical?
elaborate pls
it's just an exponent
a square root of something is just that something to the power of 1/2
yeah
you know that, right?
yessir
then just use chain rule
ok
so would the answer be
well
for that part
its 1/2(1-x^2)(2x)
@bright surge
should i just put it all together now
yeah i think the problem is
i dont know how to add them all together
its not fitting together
@bright surge
no sorry
uh
ill put in paint sreenshots
that's ok
i can write it out with my mouse hah
doesn't matter
(as long as it's readable...)
so would you multiply the chainrule out?
wait what?
uhhhhhhhhhhh
i think you have a mistake with the chain rule part
isnt chainrule f'(g(x)) (g'(x))
so
so what would you choose as f and g?
that's right
i use chain rule right here right
yeah
did i stick a x^2 in there
isn't it supposed to be $\sqrt{1-x^2}$ though?
Adavocowana
so i can just keep it at 1/2?
so when i bring down the power using power rule
i can keep the exponent at 1/2?
casue chain rule?
Write d/dx on left side and you differentiate wrong
wym sam
you still have to bring down the exponent in f'(g(x))
$\frac{\dd}{\dd x}(\sqrt{1-x^2}) = \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{1+x^2}} \frac{\dd}{\dd x}(1+x^2)$
Adavocowana
just calculate the other derivative
multiply
and then add that to the derivative of x arcsin(x)
.close
Closed by @unique cypress
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
i will just go to sleep and pray
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I do quality of fit?
@dapper berry Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @dapper berry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm reading about sums of infinite series from a textbook, the textbooks takes the partial sum of 1/(n*(n+1)) as (1/i) - (1/(i+1)), why is this?
I understand how it split into (1/i) and (1/(i+1))
but why is it subtracting them from each other if it should be a partial sum?
ohhhhhh
nevermind i think i got it
I completely forgot you have to substitute and solve the system of equations
.close
Closed by @idle quartz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
you can use identities
cos^2(x) = (1+cos(2x))/2
then you just factor out 1/2 and you're leeft with the integral of 1 + cos(2x)
np
Closed by @quick lagoon
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
gotta find what this angle and how much does this add up to?
@severe flume Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @severe flume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
so you are trying to find x + y ?
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
nah i alreay did that but yu can help me with a different one?
is this the full picture?
ye
well let's start with a since that's the easiest
ok
you know that the sum of 30 + 50 + a = 180 right?
ye
so solving for a you'd get 180 - 50 - 30 = a
yep
ok bet
since 30 and e lie on the same "U" shape, if you were to continue the line the right line of the triangle downwards the angle below e would be 30
and so e + 30 = 180
does e equal 150 degrees because it a co-interior angle?
hell yes
lesh go
now since e is the exterior angle of d
150 + d = 180
but there's another easier way to solve that
since d and 30 lie on the same z shape
d=30 degrees
d must = 30
yep
as shown here
and then c is the same thing
lies on the same z-shape with 50
and to be certain you are correct check that your a + c +d = 180 since all the angles of a triangle must sum up to 180
(it is btw)
ohh
ok
then c =50 degrees because if you a+d= 130 degrees then 130-180=50 degrees?
yessir
seems like it
thank you very much
anytime
Closed by @severe flume
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
some points exist in an n-dimensional space, given some of the distances between the points, find the smallest possible value of n
probably has a wikipedia article, but I don't know its name so i cant search for it
@gleaming cave Has your question been resolved?
4 points all 1 away from each other
oops forgot to mension euclidean space/distance
actually if the popular problem is noneuclidean thats fine aswell
i know its known math because my psychology book said some words about it when psychologists calculated the # of dimensions human emotion lies on
the math in that instance is obviously
A) more complicated due to imprecision
B) easier due to bashing
@gleaming cave Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
ya
I got
something
but not sure
is correct
OF = j+k
ED = -j-k
AG = i+k
but feel wrong
oh
ty
.close
Closed by @white hornet
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
A straight line passes through the point (3, 5) and has the slope a/3. Determine a so that the line also goes through:
a) point (5, a)
b) the point on the y-axis where y = -4a
c) the point on the x-axis where x = 3-a.
$$f\left(x\right)=\frac{a}{3}+m$$
$$5=a+m$$
$$5-a:=:m$$
Theophania
Is this correct steps in the beginning?
Okay I solved question a), but I don't know how to solve b).
@gray vine Has your question been resolved?
@gray vine Has your question been resolved?
Btw, we write the equation in this form here in Sweden:
y = kx + m, as opposed to y = mx + b
@gray vine Has your question been resolved?
First, figure out what is the general equation of a line that goes through the point (3, 5) with a slope of a/3. This can be done by the point slope formula
For part b), you are given that the line goes through another point.
Can you figure out what the coordinates are of the point that lies on the y-axis and y=-4a?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can anybody help me out on ii, i dont understand the question and dont know what to do 😦
I already solved i but have no idea at all how to solve ii
Is it not just differentiating f' and solving?
uhh can you elaborate a bit
What part doesn't make sense?
You're given f'; differentiating that gives you f", from which you can solve f"(x) = 4 with high school algebra
Commands:
clopen: .close, .reopen
factoids: .tag
help: .help
Type .help <command name> for more info on a command.
Usage: .tag ...
Manage factoids.
Sub-commands:
.tag add <name>
.tag alias <name> <newname>
.tag delete <name>
.tag edit <name>
.tag info <name>
.tag top
.tag unalias <name>
Type .help tag <sub-command name> for more info on a sub-command.
.help open
No command called "open" found.
Commands:
clopen: .close, .reopen
factoids: .tag
help: .help
Type .help <command name> for more info on a command.
ok wat
Is this symetrical or anti-symetrical?
Id say its none
since it doesnt even have a proper diagonal
oh
nvm wait
.close
.close
Closed by @ivory pollen
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
there @umbral pulsar
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Posted in another 👌
.close
Closed by @umbral pulsar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Did I do this correctly?
i just wanna know if i did it right
Yup looks good to me @crimson sedge
Looks good
@crimson sedge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can i prove tan(pi(x-(1/2)) and its inverse 1/pi (arctan(x)) + (1/2) are injective functions from (0,1) to R and from R to (0,1) respectively?
I would just make a claim that it's monotonic increasing i.e. bijective
see we only ever saw that bijective = injective and surjective
never the monotonic increasing thing
Do you know derivatives?
Do you know continuity?
yeah
Your proof would look something like this
monotonic increasing=injective
Basically the derivative is strictly positive
yeah but is there any website that i can link to that claims that
since its for a task
So it's injective
the full task is prove [0,1] is equinumerous with R and the deadline is in less then 2 hours lol
using continuity and bounds you should be sufficient
yeah just use
- continuity
- strictly positive derivative
and you should be set
maybe an argument by contradiction
Does any individual part not make sense?
Well, im not how i would prove continious and increasing over intervall = injective
You can make an argument by contradiction
So i claim a function is injective while not having a strictly positive derivative?
otherway around
show that a function that is not injective while continuous increasing is not possible
i.e. consider two points x and x+h
that's how I would do it
namely it's going to be bijective so the inverse should prove true as well
Im lost sorry man, i really dont grasp the concepts talked about in class yet
maybe a better solution for me is to go about proving the equinumerousity between R and [0,1] differently
I'm trying to think how I can help you without telling you how to do it
Rn i was going to prove an injection from R to (0,1) and vice versa using that tan function and its inverse
What's your approach to do that?
according to the schroder cantor whatever theorem there exists a bijection between the 2 sets if thats true
That is true
and then i'd refer to the hotel paradox thing and claim that adding elements to this set doesnt change the cardinality so id just add 0 and 1 to the (0,1) interval to make [0,1]
no idea tbh
injective means for a,b element of a set, f(a) is not equal to f(b)
whats that
that's as much I can help you without telling you the solution
alright thanks
@wintry wasp Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wintry wasp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
does anyone know how to make a sin wave more linear?
I guess. Sin waves ease in and out
o perfect
Like that?
what is the most basic form if I may ask
Lemme see
,w plot arcsin(sinx)
@graceful karma @upper knot
u guys r friggn awesome!
Yeah that
I didn't actually know that was a way to write it
But I guess it is
I've always defined it using mod
how would you do that
It's kinda just the abs value of a sawtooth wave
With some extra stuff on top
,w plot sawtooth wave
@upper knot Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @upper knot
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
im trying to solve this system of equations but the only thing i can think of is trying all possible values of b and d (-1 and -20, -2 and -10, -5 and -4, 4 and 5, 10 and 2, 20 and 1 (and the other way around)) to solve, i am just asking if there might be a faster way?
@polar marsh Has your question been resolved?
Plug a = -c everywhere, so $c(d - b) = 1$ by third equation ; since both are integers, $d - b = \pm 1$ et $bd = 20$, therefore $b,d = (4,5) ; (5,4) ; (-4, -5) ; (-5, -4)$, and $c = \pm 1$. So $b + d = -9$ or $9$. By equation 2, $b + d = -9$. So you just have to check $(-4, -5)$ and $(-5, -4)$.
polikuj2
Closed by @polar marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Do you know the area of a rectangle?
you basically need to separate that into 3 rectangles and 2 triangles, calculate the area of every one of them, then add them up
np
.close
Closed by @atomic quest
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Any line perpendicular to y = 4x - 3 has slope -1/4
Any line perpendicular to y = 4x - 3 has slope -1/4
y = m(x - x_0) + y_0?
So if your line is perpendicular to y = 4x - 3...
We are looking for lines perpendicular to y = 4x - 3. Therefore we are looking for lines with slope -1/4
Kek yeah I thought that might be happening.
omg
I do that too
Closed by @hot socket
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
f(x) is a linear function whose graph passes through the point (0, 4) and intersects the graph of g(x) = -x - 2 at a right angle. What is f(x)?
Right answer should be f(x) = x+4
what have you tried?
what do i do when my confidence interval contains my null hypothesis but my p value rejects my null hypothesis?
im doing a basic poisson counting experiment thing where background expected is 1.5 events
i see 4 events
my 90% cl interval is 1.35 to 9.15
my p value with a test size of 0.10 is 0.06565
...
so if its right angled, i assume we have a scenario of $k_1\cdot k_2=-1$
Theophania
what's k?
Oh the coefficient of x
yeees
then yes
we use kx+m
so we should then have f(x) = x + m, and then 4 = 0 + m, so m = 4
m being the y-intercept
yeah, that's right
Closed by @gray vine
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
show that
i dont know how you approach this
What's your definition of sin and cos ?
?
well
if you are asking if there is anymore to this question then no, this is it
you could use th eformula
i think you are supposed to use trig identities to prove this
so is A = pi/2, B = x?
yep
ok i think i might understand this
then just simplify
ye hold on ill try and figure it out
ive ran into a problem
@void whale could you help me out? the other dude went
q) show that
so im doing cos^2A + sin^2A = 1 to find out cosA
cos^2A + (pi/2)^2 = 1
cos^2A + = 1 - (pi/2)^2
this gives me a negative which cant be square rooted
but i thought sinA = pi/2
No, A = pi/2
im suck now because i cant workout cosB due to sinB = x
(pi/2)(cosB) + x = Cosx
this is what im working with
im not good with graphs unfortunately but im pretty sure im supposed to do using identities
draw a circle radius 1
its a skill i need to learn
I mean using simple equations is worse than using graphs
i hate graphs tho the only one i like is the circle graph
the teacher would give you a much higher score if you properly know how to use graphs
doesn't mean you don't need to do it 🤷♂️
well its not a name for the graph its more of a name for the quadrants
so you know which one sine is positive in and which one it isnt
well idk the teacher wanted it in identities but i do have much harder questions that will require graph format
ok I'll just do in graph war
way
can you imagine a circle on a graph that has a radius of 1 and point at (0,0)?
ye
i didnt know that
well i could switch questions to the one that requires a graph and ill finish off that one tomorrow
yup
cosx isnt in the x coords tho
ok
well uhh that coords at the top isnt correct trust me
anyways
just concentrate at the graph
only the grpah
couldnt get better pics
looks sus
you see the triangle with points O, K, Q right?
angle AOK is basically pi/2 + 0 right
ye i know
if an angle goes above pi/2 just think of the triangle like KOQ
don't think of the whole angle just that triangle
if you look at y coords it's supposed to be sin0
but in that situation y coords became cos0
pi/2 + 0 becomes triangle KOQ instead of PMO
so you need to think in that triangle
im confused on why the triangles are important here
ahh so you are working in triangles
yea
im just worrying because if i learn the graph way of doing stuff like this im worried i wont be able to use the identities when i need to. I dont know if in higher maths i will need to
lol
You can understand identities and properly use them if you use graphs
also in higher math levels you'll get to use graphs more
The best thing in making people understand is to use visual images
and that's what graphs do :))
ok ok
i am def a graph lover wee
ok uhh I just came by to tell you how to prove that in a graph way
so like uhh
yeah im heading out lmao
but i still dont know
ok i guess im stuck here
could you label the graph in my situation
and then ill get a better idea on how to solve it
ye i understand but could you show me a example of plotting it first
that'd be really helpful
wdym
show
well she told me to do it using identities
What was the issue with using your identities
this is my first time using a graph
so no graphs
It should be a 3 line proof
3 line!!?!?!?!?
Well i was teaching him the graph way
Dun dun dunnn
the graph solution
ok hold on let me find it
im suck now because i cant workout cosB due to sinB = x
(pi/2)(cosB) + x = Cosx
you know this is better to go on by using graphs right
lol
sin(pi/2 + x) = cos(x)
sin(pi/2) cos(x) + cos(pi/2) sin(x) = cos(x)
Do you get to here?
yes i worked out cosA also
ok well tbh I'd rather use graphs but your teacher has an enormous skill issue and low social credit score not allowing you to use graphs
im heading out
lol this guy
Adios
i used the sin^2A + Cos^2A = 1 formula to work out cosA which i got cosA = 1
but i cant work out cosB because sinB = x
hence im left with (pi/2)(cosB) + x = Cosx
So youre starting by converting sin(pi/2+x) to sin(pi/2)cos(x)+cos(pi/2)sin(x)
And then using the squared identity to simplify?
how do you know that cosA = cos(pi/2) and how do you know that sinB = sinx(x)
sin(a+b) = sinA * cosB + cosA * sinB
how do you know the last 2 in that equation
ahh
ok mb
i see it now
Epic
whats next tho
Evaluate cos(pi/2) and sin(pi/2)
hmm how
Using your unit circle or smthn like that
hm
Whats pi/2 radians in degrees
90
So whats the x value of a point on a circle, radius 1, at 90 degrees counterclockwise from the positive x axis
Yeah
Yes
so 0?
Yeah
oh wow that was right
if sin is the y so 0? (previous guy said sin is the y) if im wrong dont give answer i have another approach
It shouldnt be 0
does it have to do with multiplying by 0 and 1
Yes
1 * cos(x) + 0 * sin(x)
Other way
oh yeah i see
we still need to figure out cos(x) tho
Wdym
how do you know what the equation equals if there is a missing value
if cos(x) = 0 then our answer changes same with if cos(x)= 1
@graceful karma ^
ohhh thats genius
yo proofs are fun as hell
dude that is actually insane
ive got quite a lot more to go through but it makes sense
thanks
Np
hey would you be able to help me out with one more question. its one of the last questions on the sheet and i want to know how to do it
One sec
Hmm
This ones tougher
Well R sin(wt+a) can be expanded
R[sin(wt)cos(a) + cos(wt)sin(a)]
Rsin(wt)cos(a) + Rcos(wt)sin(a)
So you want to find a value of a such that
R*cos(a)=8
R*sin(a)=15
Do you follow
let me think hold on
ahh i see what you are kinda doing here
its that rule
remember that identity
ok
this one
Yeah that one
so i understand up until this line
Rsin(wt)cos(a) + Rcos(wt)sin(a)
what do we do next?
Well so thats in the same form
The coefficient is entirely determined by R*cos(a)
And R*sin(a)
Right?
ye that makes sense
So you can write a formula
Rcos(a)=8
Rsin(a)=15
Or
R cos(a) = R sin(a) - 7
R[cos(a) - sin(a)] = 7
cos(a) - sin(a) = 7/R
And uhhh
🤔
We're in a similar situation thats slightly simpler
This is gonna come out nastily
i have the answer and it is nasty
but i dont know how you get it into that format
how do we turn this Rsin(wt)cos(a) + Rcos(wt)sin(a) into that format
Lemme try smthn else
R cos(a)=8
R sin(a)=15
R=8/cos(a)
R=15/sin(a)
8/cos(a)=15/sin(a)
8sin(a)=15cos(a)
sin(a)/cos(a)=15/8
Taking in the convenient fact that sin(x)/cos(x) = tan(x)
tan(a)=15/8
a=arctan(15/8)
Les go
do we have to do something else?
Just plug it back in
Oh wait
are we doing this to workout R ?
We still gotta solve for R yeah
thats nice
