#help-13
1 messages Ā· Page 421 of 1
if you're familiar with card games you can ask yourself like "is this more like cards in hand or cards arranged on a table"
In which one is order important and repetition allowed?
this one's about order specifically
and order is important in the "arranged on a table" scenario
with cards in your hand you can rearrange them any way you like -- what matters is not which card is the leftmost in your hand but what cards you have and don't
As in arranged face up in order from lowest to highest?
no
think more like poker
it kinda matters for gameplay purposes which card ends up as the turn and which as the river
vs. the same cards being known already at the flop
Hmmm I dont know poker haha
But for an example
This is like cards in the hand because it doesnt matter about which friend gets which icecream, right?
Oh wait i just checked it says order is important...
it DOES matter who gets what flavor
Ok I dont really understand then haha
some ppl might have preferences for or against some of these
if you just order "2 vanilla, 4 chocolate" it does matter which of your friends get the vanillas
Ohhhhh
I see
Ok 1 sec another example
So order isnt important right? Cause were just checking all the different combinations?
So its like cards in hand?
order is important in the sense of it matters who's the chair, who's the treasurer and who's the admin -- those positions are not interchangeable
but among the rest of the committee members it doesnt
... maybe this was a bad idea all along to give the cards analogy
Ah sry i didnt post the full thing
So order is still important?
yeah ok i think i dont know how to explain this without just giving out the answer as is
definitely drop the cards analogy
Im just trying to figure out about order and repetition first before I actually attempt these questions
gonna go watch some more videos on this topic
.close
Closed by @wild belfry
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
no idea what to do after finding the gradient vector
The gradient vector needs to point in the same direction as (1,1)
aka they have to be (positive) scalar multples of each other
ye so
< 2xy + y^2, x^2 + 2xy > = c * < 1, 1 >
where c is some scalar positive constant
correct
after that i equate them to each other ?
mhm
i get y = x, -x
yep
so check if those two cases (y=x and y=-x) give you a c is positive

If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
@muted cedar Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @muted cedar
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help me out on this?
plug x=-3 into g(x)
then use that number in red, suppose it's some number c. then repeat with x=c plugged into f(x)
Would it be g(-3)=2 ?
This was like the only problem I was lost on. I've always struggled with graphs.
f(2)=2???
f(2) = 2 is correct, but you were wrong about g(-3)=2
read this and try again
follow the vertical line up to the red point?
Wait
I think I get it
You just go up to the blue line from the -3 point
I think
OHHHHH it was 4!!!!
Thanks for the help
.close
Closed by @onyx girder
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How does one come up with these repeating bit patterns? I assume you'd use a geometric series or such? It's been a while since I've done any analysis or calculus whatsoever and I'm just trying to revise for my computer systems midterm tomorrow and even if we don't have this on the exam (we will have stuff with 2^k, which isn't too bad) I just want to understand it for my own sake
geometric series
for the first note that:
[\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\left(\frac14\right)^n=\frac{\frac14}{1-\frac14}=\frac13]
PajamaMamaLlama
oooooh I see
then of course, this is 1/4^n so we're missing out on 1/2, 1/8, 1/32 etc. so that's why we alternative 0.01010... for 1/3
similar things occur for 1/5 and 1/10
Right, that makes sense
thank you :)
I'm a little embarrassed that I missed such a simple sum š
no worries, more embarrassing things have been said/asked 
Understandable, nevertheless, thank you very much again for your help
,close
.close
Closed by @dire storm
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Historical question: What was the first time someone wrote down a proof of the Pythagorean theorem? (Not pythagorean triples, not the statement, I'm looking for a proof)
As far as I understand, we don't know
@smoky owl Has your question been resolved?
Do we know of any that predates Euclid's elements?
from this, there appears to be an older proof for the special case of 3-4-5 triangles (could be easily generalized), but the first extant fully general proof appears to be in the elements
Closed by @smoky owl
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm honestly not sure where to start on this problem 
I know that a simple group has no strict normal subgroups other than {e} by definition, but I don't see why that's important here, or what to do with the abelian assumption
could somebody lend me a suggestion?
hm, maybe contrapositive is easier here 
if A is not isomorphic to Z/p, then A is not generated by a single element a 
and maybe I can construct a normal subgroup of A like this
okay, I think this will be the plan after all 
.close
Closed by @void sand
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How do I solve this
(a+b)^n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} \binom{n}{k} a^{n-k}b^{k}
avec
\binom{n}{k} = \frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}
(x+2)^4 = x^4 + 8x^3 + 24x^2 + 32x + 16
How do I solve this
[(a+b)^n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} \binom{n}{k} a^{n-k}b^{k}]
avec
[\binom{n}{k} = \frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}]
[(x+2)^4 = x^4 + 8x^3 + 24x^2 + 32x + 16]
k
What are u tryna solve here
Probably hes trying to prove that this is true, or at least how would one come to the last polynomial expression based on the first identity.
@broken talon Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need some help with 4
what have you tried
To be honest, we were never learnt finding derivatives of trig yet
so idk why they gave us this question
that should've all be taught in calc 1 before integrals
we will learn trig sooon however
course structure sounds a little dodgy,
try looking up derivatives and integrals of trig functions
wait, then why are you expected to solve this before learning about trig derivs and integrals?
do u know the derivative of sinx
uhh
uhh
those are reciprocal trig functions
It's cos
your lecturer is cooking you
Bruh moment
Yeah you need to learn trig functions in calculus before you try integrating them
I mean
Don't know how that would work
course structure sounds a little dodgy,
try looking up derivatives and integrals of trig functions
After you were given a question involving calc with trig functions?
usually you'd be taught most derivatives before being introduced to integrals
They're expecting you to do something that you haven't been taught
You might as well reinvent calculus at that point
if you've done stuff with first principles you could get the derivatives yourself
That's quite difficult if you haven't seen the derivation before
i done the first principle
You need to use geometry and the squeeze theorem to find lim[x->0]{sin(x)/x}
do you know compound angle identifed and common limits involving trig functions
I dont think so
Biggest bruh moment I swear
probably best to just look up the result for now
Has to integrate tan(x) without being taught derivatives of trig functions
Like what
thats weird fr
if you want to do the question
or just wait for your class
erm akshually cotx
Might as well skip it
so you've never seen stuff like\ \
$\dv{x} \sin(x), [\sin(x)]'$?
ĻαμOmeganato5
course structure sounds a little dodgy,
try looking up derivatives and integrals of trig functions
Try differentiating yourself
that snapshot is enough to complete the question
I love how a chemistry channel is teaching calculus š¤£
if you had no issues with Q1 to 3
Yeah just use u-substitution
I was never taught u sub as well
u-sub isn't explicitly needed
it helps some people but the integrals in this set have a similar form
recognising the derivatives in that vid, you can apply the same idea
so its [ln(sinx)], upper bound: pi/2, lower bound: pi/4
yes
Your class is doing you dirty bro
congrats!!
no
you're not applying log and trig laws properly
and try not to do an excessive amount of things at once
i recommend to ALWAYS (even if its just a single character) put () around the argument of your logs
oh wait
firstly i wouldn't apply that log law here
when you could do a lot of simplification evaluating directly
ln**(** sin(pi/2) ) - ln ( sin(pi/4) )
but if you really wanted to apply the difference to quotient law, that gets you something different to what you wrote down
without those (), you treated lnsin as a log function
and in the subsequent step that sin also vanished
so its a mess
I got ln(2) again
i recommend to ALWAYS (even if its just a single character) put () around the argument of your logs
this extends to ALL functions
it should've been clear that you can't extract that /2 from the sin(pi/2)
i mean tbh, isn't this a manifestation of "op has no good grasp of what a function is bc he's not yet done that thorough algebra review he's in dire need of"?
also the attempt at manipulation is excessive,
just because you see "something" doesn't mean you must apply some law to get rid of that
Didnāt I do it
the red part is invalid, and you dropped () around the pi/4
the whole point of having those ()
is that they're a hard indicator that you can't freely move stuff in/out of those parentheses
$\sin(kx) \redneq k \sin(x)$
ĻαμOmeganato5
I see
What do u mean
well i'm assuming you applied difference to quotient log law
because
you saw you had a difference of logs
and you attempted to manipulate the multiple fractions because you saw multiple fractions present and didn't like that
in some cases it would be really helpful, but that doesn't mean that you should or have to do it every time
like the situation yesterday with the ln(1)
similar thing here, why not try evaluating directly
^ not *.
Yep ^
if you do not already know that log_a(1)=0 or need a reminder for yourself, then sure
you could use that inverse relationship to justify the value of ln(1),
but there is no real need for that work and you can just assert that ln(1) = 0
evaluate: ln(1)
answer: 0,
(nothing else needed)
any log to 1 is equal to 0
to is the wrong word
any log of 1 is equal to 0
yes, assuming the base is valid
fox(x, y); ā(fox)/āx (Flower)
likewise, $\sin(\frac{\pi}{4}) \neq \frac{\sin(\pi)}{4}$
fox(x, y); ā(fox)/āx (Flower)
it has been pointed out to you already
^
I thought that was only for ln or log functions
with FUNCTIONS IN GENERAL you CAN'T pull factors out like that.
UNLESS you explicitly know FOR A FACT that you can do that IN A SPECIFIC CONTEXT
didn't i just say this
let's try to forget about logs
just forget about logs for a bit
what is sin(pi/2)?
sin(1.57079ā¦)
no, you should be able to tell me the exact value of it
the value, please
big nope
you definitely used a calculator and you definitely had it in degree mode
both of which were wrong
ok so basically you also need to review trigonometry a lot
cause right now you're kinda in a state where, as sad as it is to declare, you don't know squat
the ability to recall a trig value such as sin(pi/2) unassisted by a calculator is about as important as being able to multiply 3*4 without a calculator
To be honest, itās best to skip this question and come back to it later. I havnt learnt calculus of trig functions yet
though if you want a basic example of why that doesn't hold generally
as stated earlier
no need to even consider trig functions
just consider f(x) = x + 1
f(4/2) = f(2) = 2+1 = 3
but f(4)/2 = (4+1)/2 = 5/2
see the issue?
Yes
we have rules in algebra for a reason, good sir
If we had f(x)= 10+x + 3 + 2
and had to evaluate f(x)/2, would it (10+x+3+2)/2
you haven't learned TRIG FUNCTIONS THEMSELVES yet!
or you have but you forgor it all
this would be correct as per the bracketing given
@torn marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey I am trying to prove that if n squared is dividable by 3 then so is n.
I just started my calculus course so syntax might be off.
The official courses solution is trying to proof by denying then show contradiction.
I am trying to proof by assuming then proving and I got to section 5.
I canāt find a way to prove that section and if I do find a way will this be a viable solution to the question?
Thanks in advance!
Look at how elements of ā/3 behave when squared
In particular, when do they stay in ā/3
Not sure I get u. Do u have any way of drawing it? From what I understood u want me to try and square the numbers in the set for instance the first number 1/3 squared is 1/9 meaning it is out of the set. The only numbers that stay in the set are when OOOOO
I got it mid sentence wait
Good
How to prove that there isnāt any number down the line where they both exist when p isnāt natural?
Every element in ā/3 is one of three forms
n +(1/3)
n+ (2/3)
n
Show what happens for each form
while n is in N right?
Also this is overcomplicating the problem. Sometimes just doing it by contradiction is fine
Yes
Ik itās also the official solution I just wanted to check if there was a way to prove it like this if I get stuck in an exam or something
Thank u so much tho
How do I close the channel?
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @past wave
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
.close
Smh let OP do it
Lol
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help with this problem
So confused on where to start
have you solved problems of this kind before?
"given sin(x)=[number] and some other info, find cos(x)"
you can solve for this in a couple of ways
either you solve for x itself
or you use the pythagorean identity
^
let's let @rancid prairie answer the question i asked him, though.
make a triangle and use pythagoras theorem
what is happening lol
not really
first make a triangle with the values ur given for sinx, cosx or tanx
ye ye
sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1.
u know that sinx = perpendicular/hypotenuse etc... right?
Let ann help first
tbh i think the triangle method is intended given how clean the values are
this is either poorly worded or incorrect or both
You can share your method afterwards
i was thinking about tanx and sinx at the same time and mixed up
and i would rather handle this on my own without interruption by anybody else
š
I'm listening Ann
so starting with this
can you use the identity sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1 and the known value of sin(x) to solve for cos(x)?
ignore the interval thing for the moment
we won't be done yet, but i want you to do this one step yourself.
pothecary?
py-tha-go-ras
LOL
anyway, go and do what i asked you.
its translating it lol
preferably don't jump ahead.
Ok so it would be (3/5)^2 + cos^2(x) = 1?
yes, keep going.
ah no
cos^2(x) = (4/5)^2
at this point you should have stopped because the next step would be cos(x) = **±**4/5
and now is where the interval thing comes in
[pi/2, pi] is the second quadrant; is cos(x) positive or negative here?
yes, cos(x) = -4/5
ik ik
ikik
I'm just fast typing it
I think I could figure it out from here
I get it now
thanks!
@rancid prairie Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @rancid prairie
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me with this equation.
the task is "solve the following equation"
i tried back and forth, the furtherst i came was -x² + x = -0,5 (it might include calculation mistakes)
That's decent
$\frac{3x+1}{x}=2x+1$
ImOakley
$3x+1=2x^2+x$
ImOakley
i was going to ask if they got here because he says he got -x^2+x
Well it looked like you were about to give them the answer
alr sorry
šøšššššššĀ³
You would multiply by š„ on both sides to get rid of the denominator
Which would be
šøšššššššĀ³
which you can distribute the š„
šøšššššššĀ³
Herro?
you still there?
@rancid thorn Has your question been resolved?
š where did he go 
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
All the triangles that are created have two of their sides being equal
Could probably use herons formula in some way
The semiperimeter is r+k/2
i do not know this formula sadly
consider the case where you have a triangle
each of the 3 triangles has area 1/2 r^2 sin(theta)
implying the central angles $\theta_1 = \theta_2 = \theta_3$
south
Missing the sin
gah I was thinking about a circular sector
I realized
the key is to thus glue together congruent isosceles triangles
this is TMUA 2022 p2 by the way
wait, doesn't the figure in the solution assume that the circle centre can be on the boundary
@clever hazel Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In lesson, we were asked to solve for x, where 4^(2x+1) = 8^(2x-1). The teacher only wanted the real solution, which I believe to be x= 5/2. However, I wondered if there were any other solutions, and lo and behold, wolfram alpha comes up with infinitely many. How do you solve for these solutions, & why are there infinitely many? How can you generally solve for all solutions of an exponential equation?
Thank you in advance.
could you please explain what that is?
have you done complex numbers
it would involve the e^ix formula ig
do you understand how $\ln 4 = \ln(4 \cdot 1) = \ln(4 \cdot e^{2 \pi i})$?
what would that extent be? Do you know what the complex logarithm is, and the difference between the real logarithm?
south
Yep ,I'm fine with that
I have not before seen that
never heard of a complex log
e^(2 pi i) = 1
yeah so the crux of it is that the function $e^z$ is periodic in the imaginary direction.
Ann
makes sense
precisely because $e^{2\pi i} = 1$. the exponential is $2\pi i$-periodic!
Ann
snazzy
squaring both sides, you get e^(4 pi i) = 1
then e^(6 pi i) = 1 and e^(8 pi i) = 1 etc
so actually it's not just plusminus 2pi i, but 4pi i, 6pi i etc
so +2k pi i where k is an integer
MineNinja77777
in order to get all solutions, I mean
you can just do $\pm 2k \pi i$ to one of the sides
south
how so?
uhhhhhh hm
so $(2x + 1) \ln 4 = (2x - 1) \ln 8$
$x (2 \ln 4 - 2 \ln 8) = -\ln 4 - \ln 8$
$x (\ln(1/4)) = \ln(1/32)$
south
yup
then for some reason I can't figure out, it suffices to do $x = \frac{\ln(1/32) + 2k i \pi}{\ln(1/4)}$
south
you don't need $x = \frac{\ln(1/32) + 2k i \pi}{\ln(1/4) + 2m i \pi}$
south
okay
so that's the solution?
yup
what was this idea of a complex log?
Forget it I was probably wrong
you sure?
most likely, unless another helper has something to say on it 
there's proper definitions for the complex log that are important
and that I am implicitly using
could you explain these please?
so this is how the logarithm is defined when z is a complex number
not directly relevant, but it's for your understanding
what does it mean by $Arg(z)$?
MineNinja77777
the angle that z makes with the positive real axis, on the complex plane
the complex plane is basically like the xy plane, but where the real axis = x-axis and the imaginary axis = y-axis
yup
you can think about the complex number (a + bi) as the point (a, b)
Closed by @grizzled shard
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need help with my excerice 10 I just dont get it how u are able to calculate y to draw the graph
Could anyone help me?
@smoky topaz Has your question been resolved?
.close
Closed by @smoky topaz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me verify this limit?
Idk how to proceed
are you trying to proceed using the epsilon-delta definition of the limit ?
Yup.
I removed the abs value bc x is greater than 0
Itās between 0 and epsilon
Okay, then what you want to do is basically set an arbitrary epsilon
Then find some other quantity delta which is small enough to have x + sqrt(x) smaller than epsilon
(do you follow until here ?)
Yup
So basically you can't choose epsilon cause it's arbitrary. But once you've fixed that epsilon, you may choose delta
By delta, I mean that
it should satisfy
whenever $|x| < \delta$, then necessarily $|x + \sqrt x | < \epsilon$
Twenty
As you said, you can remove the | | here because x>0
So i have to prove that
A hint I can give you: try to find a good $\delta$ such that, for all $x < \delta$ you have both $x < \varepsilon / 2$ and $\sqrt x < \varepsilon / 2$ for example. So that when you sum them up it's still smaller than $\varepsilon / 2 + \varepsilon / 2 = \varepsilon$
Twenty
Yep, tell me if you can find it :)
Let me write
It
Although my book says smth different
On how to prove that
It says
Wait lemme translate it
Its not english
Write and solve the inequality |f(x) - l| < epsilon, with epsilon > 0.
Observe that, for arbitrarily small values of x, the inequality is satisfied in a complete neighborhood of 0 and, in particular, in a right-hand neighborhood.
I guess i donāt have to use delta?
My textbook is confusing me
@buoyant python Has your question been resolved?
I canāt figure this exercise
this?
idk how youd do it without using delta
you still gotta use delta i think
whats the book saying
.
This is what its saying
not yet bc i was trying to figure this out
try that
Wait how do i do text like this
cant i
you can
ok i canāt do it
I thought i could but i canr
I feel dumb
@summer aurora can u help me please?
sorry idk how to solve it either lol
did your textbook not do smth like that previously
No it never solves then like that
@buoyant python Has your question been resolved?
@buoyant python Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is dP/dt referring to derivative of P
Respect to time
If yes, please show the proof 
dawg itās notation
Ok whatās p0 im confused
p0 is the initial population or the population at t=0
just a constant of integration that pops out really
@torn marsh Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @torn marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me on this question please?
Without knowing what f(x) and g(x) are this question is not solvable
!original
Please show the original problem, exactly as it was stated to you, with the entire original context. A picture or screenshot is best. If the original problem is not in English, then post it anyway! The additional context might still be helpful. Do your best to provide a translation.
@open stream Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Well let's start with the second one
For continuity the limit just below and the limit just above 1 must be equal, and x becomes 1
What would that look like?
Is there something wrong?
e^b+1=2/(b^2-ln1)
Alright, where would I go from there?
It's basically a piecewise function where x<1 = x>=1, that's how we show continuity at x=1, or am I missing something big
Okay so e^b + 1 = 2/b^2
maybe expand e^b?
1 + b + b^2/2 + 1 = 2/b^2
4b^2 + 2b^3 + b^4 = 2
And I guess it's solvable after that
oh god or maybe it's not
Like how deep do you reckon we should simplify, would you say just 1 + b instead of 1 + b + b^2/2! would work?
Also are you permitted to use a graphing calculator perchance?
Yeah I am, and Iāve already figured out the other problem, Iām just struggling on how to find the answers for the one youāve been trying to help me with, which are -1.246 and 0.79, Iām just not sure how to get there
I mean if you are permitted then it's great for us
We could be as accurate as you want (like b^3/6 sounds good enough)
So e^b + 1 = 2/b^2
e^b = 2/b^2 - 1
1 + b + b^2/2 + b^3/6 = 2/b^2 - 1
2b^2 + b^3 + b^4/2 + b^5/6 = 2
12b^2 + 6b^3 + 3b^4 + b^5 = 12
Let's check that on the graphing calculator
For me itās only given -1.246 and 0.792
What, like the equation here?
From making it a function a graphing it, like y=e^x+1-2/x^2
Ahhh yeah
Dude I forgot we don't even need to expand e^b if you have graphing calculator
Yeah lol, thanks for the help though I really did not know how to get started
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @warped venture
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone explain to me
why p(x,y) = ky
i am having a little trouble understanding it
density is dependent on distance from x axis
try finding the distance from (x,0) to (x,y) using the distance between two points formula
I'm assuming they mean shortest distance between the point and the x-axis
Closed by @dire radish
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I am unsure how to solve for the variables
X=-(y+2)/3
then I plug it in
and get
(-y+2/3)^2+9y^2-10(-y+2/3)+36y=20
how do I do it after that
that's not the right way to isolate x
Closed by @marble solstice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
That's not right
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could anyone help to check my steps for this question, it dont seem to have any answers....
Or do i need to times the 4/5 /10 into the vector? Is it correct to do so?
actually wait let me recheck
im not sure if i can just mulitiply into it or no
Yes.
you can
You found the unit vector of the opposite direction. Multiplying by 8 will give the 8 unit long vector in the opposite direction vector GH.
you can multiply a vector by a scalar, it will only change its magnitude in the direction
Although intuitively, you did not need to do all of that work.
GH points straight down and the opposite direction points straight up.
here it was a scalar multiplied by vector so it worked, but if it were a vector then you have to take a cross product
Closed by @timber mauve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can anyone help question 11 please?
Im confused about what it means by move along two straight lines... Where the T suppose to be?
@timber mauve Has your question been resolved?
<@&286206848099549185>
@timber mauve Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @timber mauve
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Help
Can someone just show me the work to simplify this
I donāt really understand how to show the work when splitting the negative radicals
Radicands *
Like is it -8^2 ⢠2
Or are there brackets
Like -(8)^2 or (-8)^2
When there are no brackets, assume the negative sign is outside the square. Otherwise itās just poor notation
also 8^2 is not 16 :p
My bad
I meant this
Is that correct?
Notation
Especially?
Yeah thatās fine
Thx
.close
Closed by @smoky idol
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I need to show that the gray triangles have the same area. I know that the middle triangle have a angle of 90.
you can do this with the formula area = 1/2 ab sin C
Do I need to know what C is?
No.
You can do some nice geometric construction here
I see the sides that it shares two sides with the middle one but they have different angles and I donāt know how to go forward.
that's the point
it's a good idea to label one of the angles in the middle right triangle as theta
so then the other angle is 90 - theta
you can find the two obtuse angles in terms of theta
Is it allowed to be used the Pythagoras Theorem?
Pythagoras seems no use in this ngl
I think you eventually need to use it
u could label stuff and brute force it
like label the sides/angles and find areas explicitly
yeah that's my idea here
but this picture screams pythagoras' theorem š¤
lol
looks beautiful ngl
this is a standard pictorial representation of PT
? Not really
The triangle + the three squares, sure
But I'm not using Pythagoras here
what
oh i see, all the green triangles are congruent.
A standard pictorial representation would be like this.
the clever bit is justifying why the heights of the right and obtuse triangles are the same, of course
Right, which is just some angle calculation
well, I thought of it as ||being half of a parallelogram||
Can do that too, yeah
@solar isle Has your question been resolved?
Nasa always coming in clutch
Except when it comes to sending objects to space first
So what exactly is the method here?
pray such a diagram appears in your dreams
or practice enough Euclidean geometry to make seeing this easier
there are a few methods
I don't know why this brute-force way isn't working for me
oh wait yeah, okay I figured out how the two obtuse ones are equal
When looking for the area of a triangle, you can always try to find an adequate base-height pair; then you can try to reshape the triangle into having a right angle, with the same base and height. That's how I came up with that diagram
you start from tan theta = a/b and then a cos theta = b sin theta follows
so then a sin(theta + pi/2) = b sin(pi - theta) and that's the right form
Yea with (1/2)ab sin is the most straightforward way to get it
like in maths, there's usually a clever way, but you have to spend some time thinking creatively to get there
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ā Original question: #help-13 message
but all the steps are relatively simple, if you know your stuff
Any tips on what to search to understand the concepts?
no
š¢
This is basically the only tip I can give
Well, since the question is to show that the triangles have the same area, you can think of it as given while you are coming up with the proof
Like, don't just try to calculate the areas individually; you know they are equal, so find a way to relate them
(and then check that the relations you found are actually correct)
Any one can help how to solve it step by step provided only these formulas....I know we have to do u substittution but I get stuck after that, thanks in advance.
!help
To ask for mathematics help on this server, please open your own help channel or help thread. See #āhow-to-get-help for instructions.
yep
go open your own channel then
I went to Cannels and roles and from there I customized it to help in maths, if that's what you meant I already did it.
go ask in #help-36
Thanks
@solar isle Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do u guys know why its looking like a straight line?
I am attemping e
the graph is not supposed to be straight
I think it is because you chose the x-variables too close.
the intervals?
did your teacher chose to expand sinh for a reason?
I mean instead of choosinf x from {-2, -1, 0, 1, 2}, I think it would be better to choose from like {-10, -5, 0, 5, 10}
$sinh(x) = \dfrac{e^{x} - e^{-x}}{2}$
Erebus
we never been taught
this
just pure calculus of exponentials
idk how this function supposed to look like
I see.
yea its pretty weird
I seee
what am i supposed to do? let my teacher now
or
idk what to do at this point
Idk, it depends
If you want to draw the graph
Just draw it
If you want to learn more about these functions
You should probably go watch some videos related to them
could u suggest me few if its possible
This calculus video tutorial provides a basic introduction into hyperbolic trig functions such as sinh(x), cosh(x), and tanh(x).
Hyperbolic Functions - Formula Sheet: https://www.video-tutor.net/calculus-formula-sheets.html
Final Exam and Test Prep Videos:
https://bit.ly/41WNmI9
Hyperbolic Trig Functi...
Closed by @torn marsh
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
$y[n]=\sum_{m=-2}^{2}(3-|m|),\text{sgn}(n-m)
=\text{sgn}(n+2)+2,\text{sgn}(n+1)+3,\text{sgn}(n)+2,\text{sgn}(n-1)+\text{sgn}(n-2).$
where's the actual question
wait
alee
$h[n]=\begin{cases}3-|n|,& |n|\le 2 \ 0,& |n|>2\end{cases}$
maybe you could just send a screenshot
alee
im writing the problem , so i have h[n] (above)
and x[n] = sgn(n)
where sgn(n) = 1 when n >0 , 0 when n = 0 and -1 when n < 0
i have to calculate:
$y[n]=(x*h)[n]=\sum_{m=-2}^{2}(3-|m|)\mathrm{sgn}(n-m).$
alee
I tried to use the max and min indexes, but it's a mechanical process and too long
so for now i just entered all m inside
and ive got
why n is from -5 to 5 only ?
you could extend it further
but for any values of n outside the range [-3, 3] the convolution will be constant ±9 anyway
after all, all the sgn() terms will be -1 for n ⤠-3, and they're all +1 for n ℠3...
if you want, i can, specifically for you, extend the table until n = ±9
I ask myself the question, how can I think about this thing, that is, how did you realize it?
realize what exactly?
.
all i did was basically just add up your sgn() terms, the only interesting thing being that i did it in Excel rather than by hand.
sgn(n) has "interesting" (i.e. not constant) behavior near n=-1,0,1 only.
ok so here what i need to do is put n = 0,1,2,3,... etc and see what happened ?
looking only at positive values of n is not quite enough (unless you can convince yourself that the signal is an odd function of n)
so basically in this case there a change at m>n and m< n ?
$y[n]=\sum_{m<n}h[m]-\sum_{m>n}h[m]$
alee
.close
Closed by @dry fossil
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
can someone guide me through this solution
i did not wish to know anything about your opinion on the looks of any of your friends and i wish to un-know that particular bit of info
anyway i would not expect this to have anywhere near a nice solution
ur friend is probably trolling u
ok, so what else did your friend say to do w/ this
,w solve (x^4-6x^3+11x^2-6x+2)/sqrt(x+1) +ln(x^2+1) = e^(x/2)
wolfram aināt being helpful here
hi again
x = 1?
dosent work
pls tell me X is a variable here and not a Random Var
Iām not even sure there are great ways of cleanly solving this. 
its like a 0.3 difference
,w (x^4-6x^3+11x^2-6x+2)/sqrt(x+1) +ln(x^2+1) = e^(x/2)
lets assume that space ate that difference yay
itās a variable (I hope)
Hello

Is 2 a solution, at least it close lol 
Can i help or its late ?
well it looked like it just got answered by wolfram
Go ahead sheldon
i would be incredibly surprised if this had anything like an algebraic solution
so yes i think a graphical or numerical method is your only option
you've not told us what your friend actually wants you to do though
I canāt start to solve this and neither am I supposed to
you're on record as having said you are, and i quote, "not supposed to" solve this equation
the question remains: what ARE you supposed to do?
He said me to do the equation
"do"?
polynomial mixed with log or exponential is already bad enough.
here you have all of them and a radical chucked in as well
just skip imo
It's not very simple
+from what OP has told us till now its not even a real question its just an ugly expression made up by their friend
I am just curious to know how to solve it in a algebraic manner (of course if thereās a way)
Simply being given a question from a friend typically isn't grounds for that question a) being good, b) being solvable, c) being well within your means to attempt to begin with
is this a language barrier
"Jarvis, generates something crazy to make my friend go nut"
It's "Jarvis"*
if thereās no way itās just better to close it out I guess
(Also, "Jarvis, generate* something..."
)
.close
Closed by @runic merlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
⢠Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
⢠Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
⢠Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
⢠Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
⢠Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #āhow-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
!status
What step are you on?
1. I don't know where to begin.
2. I have begun but got stuck midway.
3. I got an answer but I was told that it's wrong.
4. I got an answer and would like my work checked.
5. I have a question about someone else's work/solution.
6. I have completed the problem and don't need help anymore. Thank you.
7. None of the above
- I don't know where to begin
Hey
We have a uniform cylinder of radius
spun with an initial angular velocity.
( \omega_0 )
YZYBlueBoy22
The cylinder is placed in a corner where it experiences friction from the two walls.
@sonic fossil
Yes i understood setup
@sonic fossil Has your question been resolved?
Hey sry yesterday idk why but I didnt got the notification. Do you still need help ? (If yes letsgo in another channel)
Yes please
Do you know Coulomb law for solild friction ? I think that's what you're looking for