#help-13
1 messages · Page 420 of 1
is this right?
to use comparison theorem:
- look at the leading degrees of xs in numerator and denominator
- break the integral up so that you eventually get 1-inf for the bounds and a rational (consisting of leading degree xs of numerator and denominators)
- use comparison theorem
?
how
Well you can bound it by f(x)=1
hold on
Integral of 1 over (0,1) is 1
It will not be convergent
yea.....
It’s not like the other part of the graph which is unfortunately
Closed by @fallow drift
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Did I do the correct thing here?
i was a bit confused on how i would find the second unit vector
Have you learnt what the cross product means in 3D Space? (hope so)
The second vector wouldn't be a unit vector
yes i think so
Luckily there is a different constant multiple you can use
why not?
Mutiplying a vector by 2 multiplies its magnitude by 2
so youre saying it would just be the same vector with a larger magnitude, rather than a 2nd new vector?
Well, the vector P, result of the operation VxU, is perpendicular to both V and U
But Vector P isnt a unique vector, in fact, there are infinite Vectors that are perpendicular to both V and U
No, you had the correct idea, just used a constant that makes the vector no longer be a unit vector
Mostly because normality / perpendicularity is defined solely by direction and not magnitude.
ahhh i seee. so how do i find the second vector?
so how would i go about fixing it?
Use a different constant multiple.
We will go with the math later, but imagine that the purple vector is the unitary perpendicular you first found
And the orange line is the direction of all vectors perpendicular to U and V (3d space btw)
Do you see where the other unitary will land?
would it land going downwards?
Yes, and specifically, if Purple has magnitude = 1, what would be the constant you should multiply with to get the other vector?
-1
Perfect, the two unitary perpendicular vectors of any UxV have both magnitude 1, and are opposite to each other
If you find any vector result from UxV, then you can construct them both
Thing is, UxV will usually lead to a vector with magnitude =/= 1
ahhh i seee🤔
that makes a lot of sense
remember that a normalized vector and a normal vector are different concepts
ill take it you know how to normalize a vector and make it unitary
umm well maybe we use different terms at my school, but what do you mean by normalize?
example:
i give you the vector (1,5,2), whats the unitary vector with the same direction?
2(1,5,2)
do you know how to calculate the magnitude of a vector?
yes
What would be the magnitude of the vector i just gave you?
sqrt(1^2 + 5^2 + 2^2)
so, sqrt(30), right?
yes correct
Given that the magnitude >1, you have to find a number to divide the vector such that the magnitude becomes 1.
and that would be 1/sqrt(30)
Now, again, for (1,5,2), whats the unitary vector with the same direction?
-> absolutely awful numbers btw
it would be v/1sqrt(30)
yeah, you could go ahead and check on your own that the result in magnitude when you distribute the 1/sqrt30 will lead to the magnitude = 1
From this, you already got all the steps.
- Do UxV = P
- Normalize P = N
- Use "N" and "-N"
Try and work the problem again to get the two vectors
ahhh okay thanks. Ill try that right now and show you what i get
okay i think i got it
You missed calculating the magnitude
-> and forgot a sign in -N
ohh i see the sign that i missed. But for the magnitude, do you mean i rounded it off incorrectly?
$\sqrt{(-1)^2+(-1)^2+5^2} = \sqrt{27} = 3\sqrt{3}$
∫ᴄ 𝐅·𝑑𝑟 = ∬ʀ ∇⨯𝐅 𝑑𝐴
I dont really know where you got the 5.2 from
ohh i see what you mean
my calculator automatically turned it into a decimal number rather than 3sqrt3
but 3sqrt3 is more accurate thanks
Oohh, its the decimal aproximation of sqrt27, mb
no problem. Thank you so muuch for all the help! I have a much better understanding now!!😁😁😁
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
btw
Bot is broken right now. This channel is open.
@cursive shore Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @cursive shore
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
so this is for pair of arbitrary sets?
Suppose There existed a uniform distribution on $\Omega$. Then $ \bigcup_{i=1}^{\infty}P({i}=1$. So $\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{n}=p$. So$p=0$, but $0≠1$.
wai
I think the wording is horrible
Who said P({i}) is 1/n?
IT IS
Its right just you need to write it bettet
it's a uniform distribution
That's a relief lol, I'm HORRIBLE at probability
Your argument would be that there is no value you can assign to P({i})
how come
If you try to assign 0, then the sum wont be 1
If you try to assign a positive value, the sum will diverge
surely I can just use this axiom
as the sets {0},{1}... partion the space, the left is 1
Yes! This is what you contradict
the right would be $1= lim_{n \to \infty}np$
wai
This would require p=1/n as n-> infty
I would phrase it as if P({i})=x>0 then 1 is a countably infinite sum of x
Which is clearly false
fair enough
tq
Another question
I can assume the transitivty of $\supseteq$ right
wai
The current time for math_rocks is 01:05 AM (IST) on Sun, 05/10/2025.
I'll sleep
tq
(a) is just induction though
Eh, I'll finish (a)
okay
done
thanks!
.close
Closed by @mighty shuttle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Among all triangles inscribed in a circle with center O and radius R , which triangle has d(O,AB)^2 + d(O,BC)^2 + d(O,CA)^2 with the smallest value (use vector to solve)
@robust pulsar Has your question been resolved?
@robust pulsar Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how to use l hopital rule in this
??
oops
First check whether you can use lh or not
$x^n -> nx^{n-1}$
Duck Man
can u pls use numbers
it would be much easier
i often get confuse when variables are used
x²->2x, x³->3x², x⁴->4x³, etc
dont we have to multply x^n ?
i got more confused after seeing this
What do you mean by this? We have something of the form f(x)/g(x) -> 0/0 as x-> 2, lhopital tells us this equals lim x->2 of f'(x)/g'(x). f(x)=3x²-x-10, g(x)=x²-4 here, so compute the derivatives here separately
Remember derivatives are linear, so $\frac{d}{dx}(3x^2) = 3\cdot \frac{d}{dx}(x^2)$ too
Crackhex
@wind forge Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone help me problem 22
im unsure where to begin
to find the bounds for this problem
can sommeone guide me pls
x'2~y
bro
wait
i need to switch
elybaord
ok
x^2+y^2 = 1 minus the otehr one
on the inside
((x-1)^2 + y^2 = 1), centered at (1,0) with radius 1
YZYBlueBoy22
i need help finding the x and y
(x^2 + y^2 = 1), centered at the origin with radius 1.
YZYBlueBoy22
Do you know how to subtract the second from the first to eliminate y/2?
uhh
yea maybe i think
idk
💀
[
x^2 + y^2 - [(x-1)^2 + y^2] = 1 - 1
]
YZYBlueBoy22
ohhh ok
[
x^2 - (x - 1)^2 = 0
]
YZYBlueBoy22
YZYBlueBoy22
2x+1=0
[
x^2 - (x^2 - 2x + 1) = 0
]
YZYBlueBoy22
Yessir
[
2x - 1 = 0 \implies x = \frac{1}{2}
]
YZYBlueBoy22
You have to do this
ok
Now substitute (x = \frac{1}{2}) into Circle 2 to find (y)
YZYBlueBoy22
[
x^2 - x^2 + 2x - 1 = 0
]
YZYBlueBoy22
into x^2+y^2=1?
No.
[
\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^2 + y^2 = 1 \implies \frac{1}{4} + y^2 = 1 \implies y^2 = \frac{3}{4} \implies y = \pm \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2}
]
YZYBlueBoy22
yeah?
Now, you have to convert intersection points to polar coordinates.
yea dw
[
x = r \cos \theta, \quad y = r \sin \theta
]
YZYBlueBoy22
Alright bro
r = 1/costheta and r = (sqrt(3) /2) over sintheta?
[
x = r \cos \theta = 1 \implies r = \frac{1}{\cos \theta}
]
YZYBlueBoy22
Yo bro, I'm going to sleep
Do you understand or?
i got to here
Appreciate it bro
but imnot sure what to do with it
Figure it out, tomorrow you are going to show your work to me.
We will check it together.
uhh tomorrow i cant tomorrow
its ok but thank you
go to sleep
its ok
thx
..close
.close
Closed by @dire radish
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Wait
My apologies
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I'm sure you will figure it by yourself ❤️🩹
.close
Closed by @frank ice
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
heyyy
idk how to start with this
This looks like you want to use induction here
Oke so i learned wat Fibonacci was. Do you still remember that F(n)= F(n-1)+F(n-2)?
Yea yea, thats the easiest base case to check
Lemme open the ()s quickly
F2n + F2n + 2Fn + 1
you'll want to use strong induction, to be precise
Im sorry if you didn't understand what i wrote
Right, now assume it works for n (and all n up to it), and try to derive that it works for n+1
@hearty summit Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hearty summit
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
yeah
alr. ill try doing more then ill send another pic
Do i start by cakculating torque? @clear ember
torque ccw = torque cw
mmmm7
where A is the point you take your moment about
sure
i feel like im doing this wrong
i need an angle
and i think the distances im using might be wrong as well
im so confused
@clear ember
😭
where did you get the numbers from
like F_g * 4???
correct
all of them should be in terms of theta
idk where you got 4 and 5 and all of that
when the ladder itself is only 3 meters
it says the mass is 1m from the top. so thats 4m form the pivot. i think thats prob wroing tho
but the ladder
is only 3 meters
ohhhhh shoot. i misread it. i thiugh the ladder was 5m long. cause the questions i was doing befre this it was 5m lol. mb
can you do the equation part for me. the counter clockwise torque = clockwise torque part. cause thats what im stuck on
oh am i supposed to use the horizontal distance?
yes
the "distance" has to be
perpendicular to the force
since the force is directed downwards
the distance is the pink
i cant get the distance for pink
i need another angle or distance
it would be cos θ = x/2
but i dont have theta
ohh i remember reading that. that makes more sense now
well
u need to write it int erms of theta yeah
so for the block it's just the force the block exerts * 2 cos(theta)
WAIT I THINK I GOT IT
is it Fgsinθ(2m)?
cause Fgsinθ would be the perpenducar force
😭 no
purple is the line of action of the force
so the pink is the "distance" we care about
which as you mentioned is 2cos(theta)
F_g (2 cos(theta)) is then what we should have
where F_g is the force exerted by the block's weighted
wouldnt Fgsinθ times the hypotnuse distance be the same as this?
Fg sin(theta) is purple though
we want pink
purple is the line of action of the force
the distance "vector"
must be perpendicular to it
pink is perpendicular to purple
wait look at the triangle i drew on top of the box. is that correct? cause i remember my teacher doing something like that
i think theres two ways to do it. i remember my teacher saying that. ill just do your way then
if u want to
move the triangle there
then u have to do some geometry
😭 to figure the angle out there
the angle is the same as the bottom one isnt it?
its fine. ill just use this
ill try doing the rest as well
ohh ok
😭 . im cooked
draw the line of action of F_w
u want the vertical distance now
since F_w's line of action is a horizontal line
whats the line of action?
take the force "vector"
and just draw a line along it
that's the line of action
of the force
line of action
wait so if the force is in the x direwction i use vertical distance. and y direction i use horizontal distance?
oh ok
ohhh that makes sense
this is also why F_f doesn't generate any moment about the pivot
so 3sinθ?
alr
lemme try solving it now
gimme a min
to find Fw, would i do sum of all forces equals 0?
yes
it's alway sstandard
to do all 3
sum of force along x = 0
sum of forces along y = 0
and sum of moments about a point = 0
alr
anyway i have to go
but i think it's really
all just math from here on out
u can probably do it
yah i think i got it. gimme a min and ill send u a new pic
@clear ember what do i now?
,rotate
im stuck at the bottom
wait if i make the sinθ into cosθ by doing 90-θ
so 618.3(3cosθ-90)
would that work?
wait but then i couldnt really factor the cosθ still
,, \cos( \theta) k = t \sin(\theta) \implies \tan(\theta) = \frac kt
mmmm7
for some real numbers k and t
provided theta is not 90 degrees
but that's obviously not the case here so we're good
^
this
move the numbers to one side
get tan(theta) on another side
by dividing by cos(theta)
so you'll have tan(theta) = something
for which u can solve for theta
like this? @clear ember
yes
ohh ok tysm for the help
well
it's tan(theta) = number
not tan^(-1) (theta) = number
also i would recommend
writing out the g's
and then computing at the very end
that way you don't propogate uncertainty
throughout your work
oh ok
but then i get a super small number like 0.0169. To get the angle wouldnt i have to do inverse tan?
mmmm7
oh wait the theta is the fraction
in your case at least cuz we only care about one solution
alr i fixed it. tysm for the help

Closed by @grand harness
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Closed by @pseudo merlin
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hello everyone, I am Turkish and I am in my last year of middle school, that is, in the 8th grade. Can someone write me a dm and explain the EBOK topic?
well not sure what EBOK is cause google is unhelpful but this isnt how the server works
ask questions on here
@fathom coyote Has your question been resolved?
no 🙁
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How can I approach the following problem :
If L2 is regular, L1 U L2 is regular, and L1 n L2 is regular, then L1 is regular.
What is L_x?
Languages
You have NFAs to generate those 3, could you modify them somehow to generate L_1?
@livid tundra Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Please don't occupy multiple help channels.
Channel closed due to the original message being deleted.
If you did not intend to do this, please open a new help channel,
as this action is irreversible, and this channel may abruptly lock.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
v is the "mid point of the segment" yeah?
which segment exactly?
i dont think theres anything to indicate its the midpoint of anything at a glance
If it were, there would probably be tick marks to indicate equivalent segments.
For sr, t is a midpoint because it has tick marks.
the question is asking me which one of these points if any is a mid point of a segment
huh
Closed by @buoyant jungle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how can you do this without saying x≠0
this is a bad example but any time you use u sub, why wouldn’t you have to do that since you are dividing by x
wdym
you had du=3x²dx and you then used dx=du/3x²
since you divided by x there anyway, you already assumed x≠0
cancelling after isnt the issue
right that’s what i’m asking about
how is that valid even if you don’t know that x≠0
right but then you have to plug it back in
what do youmean
idek what i’m asking
like when you take that step of dividing du by 3x^2, would you not have to say that x≠0? Otherwise you would be dividing both sides by zero
yes but you dont have to divide
you're not using dx=du/3x²
you're using x²dx=du/3
x² stays with dx
wdym
theres no error here if you let the x² stay with dx
im not sure about any other cases
cant really comment without seeing it first
that doesn't look elementary bro 💔
just a dx
∫ cj ☠
theres no closed form for that i believe
∫ cj ☠
i think that works
you could check the bounds and hope that $x \neq 0$ over the interval, as a start
since it does, however, how about this? \as $x \to 0,$ we can take the limit of the integrand to be $$\lim_{\substack{x \to 0 \ u \to -2}} \frac{\cancel{x^2}u^3}{3\cancel{x^2}}$$ which exists and is equal to $\frac{-8}{3}$. i.e. it doesn't matter because you're cancelling, as caspian put it
ηασιβ ♥
what substitution do u plan on using anyway
if there are no cancellations, however, you'll likely have an integrand like $\frac{1}{x^2}$, meaning it should be an improper integral near 0. i suppose in that case you are not evaluating this "limit" i proposed, you're just carrying it through to check for convergence
ηασιβ ♥
is there not an issue in this equation?
the domain isn’t restricted here
the division by zero is our algebraic manipulation
that we do symbolically
its not a part of the integral and doesn't affect the continuity
How can you count it as a valid method if carrying it out through algebraic manipulation is illegitimate
you dont really even write du=3x²dx
its du/dx=3x²
but we treat it like fractions
we're just
mnemonically expressing
the new differential
does that make sense..
how would you get that in a form such that we can utilize it in the original equation?
its not formal algebra
but the result holds
so we use it like that
its like a convenient abuse of notation
the same reason you can divide/multiply by dx, even though it's infinitesimally small 
essentially, what we are doing is actually a simplification of some deeper construct that just so happens to work out like this, and we formalize it properly in real analysis/diff geo. i must confess i am not adept enough at real analysis to explain a proof to you
it's a little bit like how you're taught a seemingly magic method of multiplying numbers in primary school, then you can go back in high school and justify it
oh damn
we can also think of the u-sub in the multivariate sense, i.e. we are taking the xy-coordinates and stretching them into uy-coordinates via a linear transformation. there is some byproduct to "balance out" the stretching; in multivariate, it's the determinant of the jacobian matrix, and i think if you worked it out for the 1x1 case you would get the u-sub back
perhaps i will do that as an exercise later
do you happen to know anyone who could show me a proof?
ther was this calculus manifolds something book
it has the rigor behind it
i think
not too sure
trying to find one bc im curious myself now - calculus of manifolds probably has one because its on the cusp of diffgeo, i think i saw a proof at one point that treated dy/dx as a quotient of differential forms
i need someone to be able to explain it to you then dumb it down for me lmfao
altering a function at finitely many points doesnt change its integral over an interval because it is equivalent to the area. So even if you're using a substitution that isnt defined at a finite number of points in the interval it doesnt matter? i think this makes sense?
yah but if there is a fundamental issue with how you go about u substitution, how do you know it’s valid? (I.e getting du in terms of dx)
i’m not sure how exactly that applies to the area
trust me bro ahh
this is why i hate how they teach math in school
it should follow logically instead of making assumptions to fill in later
atleast its not like physics
i have definitely felt this sentiment, but if you keep going with it then you are going to start elementary-school math with "we are working in the semiring N, which satisfies these ring axioms but not these ones...."
they be treating the dx with such disrespect
physics is even worse
Well i belive it to an extent. If the teacher is like “We are learning 1 2 3s,” and a student is like “What’s in between 2-3” i don’t think that knowledge should be withheld from the until later ykwim
this man wants to teach real analysis to 3 year olds
if the u substitution is invalid only at a finite number of points in the interval, you can just split the integral into parts at those points and add it, integral at a particular point is just 0, Like say the interval is [a,b] and ure using a substitution thats not defined at c,d in [a,b] (a<c<d<b) then just integrate over (a,c) , (c,d) , (d,b) where it is valid and add them
"nooo don't treat du/dx as a fraction it only works 100% of the time" ahh
I c what you are saying, but this whole thing seems like a HUGE generalization. Plus it’s not necessarily saying the function isn’t defined at x, it’s saying that the way we manipulate the function makes the computations flawed, since randomly we find that x≠0, despite the fact that the function may be defined at zero
Like the thing with math is every step shown should logically follow from the one before it. If we divide by zero, how do we keep going without saying the method of solving it is illogical
We never divide by zero; if a substitution would do so at isolated points, we split the interval there and apply the substitution only where valid. This is justified because modifying or excluding finitely many points doesn’t change the integral.
that kind of sounds like cheating but i dunno how to put it
This isn't the best answer, but:
Consider $$\int 2x^3 ; \dd x = \frac 12 x^4 + C.$$ We're going to use the reverse chain rule, i.e. $$\int f\big(u(x)\big) \cdot u'(x) ; \dd x = F\big(u(x)\big),$$ where $F$ is the antiderivative. \
Split the integral into $\int 2x^3 ; \dd x = \int 2x(x^2) ; \dd x.$ In our case, we will let $f(\alpha) = \alpha$ be the identity, and $u(x) = x^2.$ Then $f\big(u(x)\big) = x^2$ and $u'(x) = 2x$, so $$\int 2x(x^2) ; \dd x = \int u'(x) \cdot f\big(u(x)\big) ; \dd x = f\big(u(x)\big) \cdot \underbrace{u'(x) ; \dd x}_{\dd u} = F(u(x)).$$ Now, $F(\alpha) = \frac 12 \alpha^2 + C,$ so $F(u(x)) = \frac 12 x^4 + C$ as desired. \
; \
This is the machinery behind the notational steps. As I said, we refer to $u'(x) ; \dd x$ as simply $\dd u,$ thus it's easy to see that $\dd u = \dv{u}{x} \dd x$ - again, a notational "representation of the truth." Then when we subbed $u$ into the integral, we needed to find a $u'(x) ; \dd x$. Instead of inspecting around for one, in practice we simply sub in an expression that works for almost all $x,$ i.e. $\dd x = \frac{\dd u}{2x}.$ This allows us to "pick out" the $u'(x) ; \dd x$ expression easier, which we simply replace with $\dd u,$ but \textbf{no actual division is happening.}
ηασιβ ♥
I guess your main concern, however, was that this division doesn't work for 0, so why use it? difficult question to answer, but because it works for finitely many points, it is good enough of a "net" to catch this expression out, then what we actually end up with is $f\big(u(x)\big) \big(u'(x) ; \dd x\big)$, or simply $f(u(x)) ; \dd u$. If you actually wanted to worry about the validity, though, you would fall back to the intial "machinery"
ηασιβ ♥
in hindsight, should've just taken a pic of my chalkboard 🙃
but if we apply that couldn’t we end up with a lot of wacky answers?
like if you are doing trig proofs, and you come across algebraic manipulation that is impossible, then it’s probably not correct.. If we use this logic and just say it’s “good enough” doesn’t all of that also fall apart?
its not algebra, we aren't dividing anything, the basic principle falls back to the reverse chain rule as he said
we're using the notations to figure out the function involved in the anti derivative
the function we find is still satisfied along all of R, just not at these finite points. it can be formally shown that no function exists that is "wacky enough" to give you a wrong answer, given that constraint
shown how? take a limiting process over the rectangle $f(x_i) \Delta x_i$ underneath that point, or split the integral up
ηασιβ ♥
and use the fact that a function that is discontinuous at countably many points is Riemann integrable
are we also not multiplying anything when we go from du/dx=2x to du=2xdx
i think we somehow employ the chain rule, du/dx isnt a fraction but we're allowed to treat it that way through the chain rule
integral of f(y) * dy/dx wrt x can be shown equivalent to the integral of f(y) wrt y
but it looks as though we cancel the dx
maybe i should just trust bro 🥀
it can be shown that integral[f(y)*dy/dx dx] is equal to integral[f(y) dy]
we never cancel the dx
🥀
we are multiplying limits, i suppose:
if $\dv{u}{x} = 2x$ was our integrand, then $\dv{u}{x} \dd x = 2x \dd x$ is the integrand next to $\dd x.$
$\dv{u}{x} \dd x = u'(x) ; \dd x,$ which we note as $\dd u.$ Then $2x \dd x \coloneq \dd u$ is a sort of notational defintion
ηασιβ ♥
so maybe not multiplying limits, actually - i think you could argue, with a bit more justification needed, that $$\dd x = \lim_{x \to x_1} (x_1 - x),$$ or simply $$\dd x = \lim_{\norm{\Delta} \to 0} \Delta x$$ where $\Delta$ is a discrete difference.
ηασιβ ♥
hence why $\lim_{\norm{\Delta} \to 0} \sum_{\Delta_i} f(x_i) \Delta_i x = \int f(x) ; \dd x$
ηασιβ ♥
so is there a way to do it without needing to use this notation?
well, "this notation" is part of the formal definition of the integral (the sum i just wrote), so probably not
unless you would like to jump straight to measure theory and define the Lebesgue integral
you can use sup and inf instead, but you'd need to.do a little resear ch because its not usually taught in calc i. it isnt more difficult though
sup and inf?
supremum and infimum, least upper bound and greater lower bound
You should
as i said you'd need to look up those concepts if you wanted to use them
good news is
mathematicians have ironed out all the handwaving and contradictions from calculus
it took a while, and wasnt done by the inventors of calculus, but we did it
also, to your original question
the value of the integrand at a single point never changes the value of an integral, this can be proved
so you can just ignore x=0
if you'd like
right but i was arguing that if there is a point in the computation where you have to do something sketchy, that the whole process would have to be reviewed as true. For example if I had a binomial function that couldn’t be factored with the quadratic formula, the quadratic formula would have to be re-evaluated as true
every quadratic is factorable with the quadratic formula if you use complex numbers, they just don't like using them in calc i curricula
maybe i missed your point
look though, you had
x²dx=du/3
theres no division here
replace x²dx with du/3
I’m just showing that if a formula doesn’t work for one instance, it’s truth has to be re evaluated
which formula are you suspicious of
are there not instances where this doesn’t work tho? Where x doesn’t cancel out in any way
None. Just generally
I’m pretty sure a fluid dynamics formula got proven wrong the other day
sure, then integration by substitution is unhelpful. but it isnt false
Closed by @edgy sun
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Do I need to prove that each term on the right is less than or equal to the term beneath it?
yes
I'm having difficulties with the second inequality
I can show that liminf(x_n-y_n) </= limsup(x_n)-liminf(y_n)
haven't been able to do it for the added terms though
@wary forge Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @wary forge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Could someone help me with the table, i don't understand it
inequalities
which part exactly?
like how the table is structured like that, why it's a - - on the left side and ++ on the right side, etc
the table shows sign changes
when numbers x are less than 3, the sign of x-3 is negative
another way to say that is if x < 3 (numbers x are less than 3) , then x - 3 < 0 (sign of x-3 is negative)
try the rest of the row for (x-3) and the next row (x-4)
@naive hill Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @naive hill
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
ohh i see
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
do you understand what its asking
jan Niku
@pseudo merlin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
clearer photo:
Hello I'm a little stuck on this question a) could I have some hints please?
just confirming if it's okay to do this and substitute then solve?
Closed by @mighty light
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
given this g(y) (sawtooth from 0 to 1 period 1, up for 0.9s and down for 0.1s), how would I solve
$\int\frac{1}{-y+4g(y)}dy$
?
a sawtooth like this (without the offset by y-0.2)
Astral
Closed by @faint dirge
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Is this reduced to the exact form of differential eqn or it can be reduced furthermore?
this is correct
.close
Closed by @gray island
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can I get some hint please. My smooth brain can't figure out.
it's b
How lol?
okay so
using power of circles, we get rp=rp'=half of pp'
let me write how
rp²=ra×rp
rp²=rp'²
rp=rp'
then ofc pp' is the sum of both the two
so since theyre equal and add up to it theyre half of pp'
and since most options have pp and rs
your best bet is to go with rs²-ab²
then use the formula
and chop up rs into it's constituents
and it'll become ra=bs
try it
Ok
I didn't saw this part. Thanks for it.
np now continuing from there
now repeat with the opposite side
sq²
youll find ra=sa
now since ra is bs, put the value of ra as bs
in the same chopped up equation
youll find 4(ra×rb)
now think of what ra×rb can be written as
at least guess😭
@tight widget Has your question been resolved?
My brain hurts lol. But this is the right path for solution so marking it solved.
Closed by @tight widget
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
but for b i strongly believe that u can solve it 100% graphically
because the car is at constant velocity for 0.505 sec
so you need at least basic rudimentary calculations to find out when it will stop
i.e 15-6(x-0.505) = 0
you need at least this basic calculation to actually find out the time for stop
how can u do this graphically
at best u can only get approximate ans
@soft egret Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do i sketch graph of y = f(x)
graph y = x for x >= 2 and graph y = 2 for x < 2
its just 2 different graphs stitched together
like this?
yes
oh
so what was the point of doing the f(-1) stuff
those dont correlate to the graph?
what f(-1) stuff
those are just meant to help you find points on the function i guess?
Closed by @raven kayak
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how do you start this?
differentiate the equation given to you
you might get a Df / f'(x) term
Closed by @honest jasper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How
,w 42 * tan(38 deg)
Sending query to Wolfram Alpha, please wait. 
An unexpected error occurred while processing your command!
The error has been reported and should be fixed soon.
If the error persists, please contact our friendly support team at our support guild!
aiohttp.client_exceptions.ClientConnectorError: Cannot connect to host public5c.wolframalpha.com:443 ssl:default [Name or service not known]
How do you know this?
Calculator
calculator is in radians
either change to degrees or multiply the argument of tan by 180/pi
He’s looking for a length no
.close
Closed by @limpid apex
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
if i have to partially differentiate f(x-t) wrt x, how do you do it?
Just differentiate normally and put dt/dx = 0
treat the t as a constant
but how do I show it without given a specific function
Tell me what the derivative of f(x) is wrt x
f'(x)
Now answer ann
f'(x)
youre right therell be extra terms
idk sorry 😭
try by chain rule
take x - t = u and x + t = v
ok ill try this
That is not chain rule lol
Kk
is it f'(x-t)(-1) for f(x-1) wrt t
Even if it’s wrt to t?
@honest jasper Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @honest jasper
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
<@&286206848099549185>
,rccw
Couldn't find an attached image in the last 10 messages.
Need help with 96
,,The arithmetic progression a(n) difference is 3, it's given that S13-S12= 44.
supanova (Oh Ay)
Find the arithmetic progressions first number a1
please wait 15 minutes before pinging helpers in the future :)
d=3
s13-s12=44
a=?
use formula for sum of n terms of AP, do you know what that is?
if i wrote $S_{13} - S_{12}$ as
\begin{align*}
&(a_1 + a_2 + \dots + a_{12} + a_{13}) - \
&(a_1 + a_2 + \dots + a_{12})
\end{align*}
then can you see what this evaluates to?
ηασιβ ♥
@shut blaze Has your question been resolved?
Wait
This is what I wrote
Also I'm confused wdym,,before" before what? Before another person's questions is answered or? (Gen question)
no! a+(n-1)d is the formula for nth term of AP
S_n means the sum of all terms upto the nth term of AP and it has a different formula
for example S_3 = a1+a2+a3
Ohh
He meant that after you post your question, you have to wait for 15 min and after that you can ping helpers
Once you have posted your question in a channel, the channel is reserved for you. No one will post their questions in your channel so you don't have to worry about that.
now, do you happen to know the actual formula or should i tell you?
Plz do bc I'm lost in these formulas even if there aren't alot of them
Sum of first n terms of an AP,
Sₙ = (n/2) [2a+(n-1)d]
Okk
now apply that there
How? I don't know a
assume it variable 'a'
put it in equation and that's how you will get value of 'a'
just like you put 'x' in equation and find x's value
Oh so find it?
yes that's what's asked
here, what do you think is a1?
a=a1 they are different ways to write same thing
it's clear now?
No
do it again with correct formula and see if you get first term a1 or a
Okay I'll send if I'm doing right
what exactly you don't understand
you know d=3
and S13-S12 = 44
use the formula to find values of s13, s12 and substitute in this equation
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
I tried am I going in the right direction or?
no S_13 ≠ (a1+a13) × 13 / 2
.reopen
✅ Original question: #help-13 message
Sₙ = (n/2) [2×a1+(n-1)d]
S13 = (13/2) [2×a1+(13-1)3]
you get how S13 is found here?
is this formula even taught to you? If not, we can do the question a simpler way if you want
Yes I was just sick that day
Got the notes tho
oh you wrote that actually mb
Okkie
then put their values in the equation you know
Okkie
ping me if you need me
I have answer can I send?
yes
correct
now, before closing I want you to understand this aswell
There are 2 ways to do this: 1 st by formula which is direct and will always work, other is by observing and this will work in many cases but not always but when it does work it saves lot of your time
and 2nd method does work in this case, it was given that S13-S12=44
It's literal meaning is that sum of first 13 terms minus sum of first 12 terms is equal to 44
so that will translate to
(sum of first 13 terms) - (sum of first 12 terms) = 44
(a1+a2...a12+a13) - (a1+a2...a12) = 44
Yes I get that much
do you see most of the terms cancel out like this?
Yes actually wait that's smart
and you directly get a13=44 and with simpler formula you get a+12d = 44
so you save lot of stress with this
Is it okay that I took a ss?
yes it's public channel no problem
Okie thx have a nice day :DD
ok bye
.close
Closed by @shut blaze
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hey just out of curiosity I made the graph of factorial , but I don't understand why it is defined for negative numbers, why it is 0 in the negative x axis , why it is undefined at negative integers , i don't understand.
look up gamma function
this thing actually never equals 0, it just approaches 0 really really really closely the further left you go
I was actually solving some problems on the gamma function can you enlighten me like how should I think
Should I put n= some random integer in the gamma function
god idk, Gamma(z+1) = z*Gamma(z)? that's how you extend it to the left.
Then see what happens
Yes sorry auto correct I'm typing with my mobile
Yes so if I put some random negative rational which is not equal to an integer , then I should get something approaching to 0
That's for giving me a direction I'll try it
.close
Closed by @upbeat lotus
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• Do not immediately ping people or roles. After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185> once.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
In combinatorics how do you tell if order is important or repetition is allowed? Is there a rule or guidelines I can follow to figure that out about a statement?