#help-13
1 messages · Page 400 of 1
can you tell me what this recursion means in english?
i would have put berdly but i dont wanna say something like “oh my sweet gamer player 2…” or something
hmmm
okay you can think of it like this
then it goes to x^-1 / 1 ?
How about we do this:
$x^k = x^k \times \frac xx$
VulcanOne
x^k would go on top right
Yeah if we keep multiplying it by x/x
The x at the denominator will keep going with it as well
wait no i dont show me an example or does the x on the bottom stay the same
Wait you're still confused about the z^-1?
yes somehow
Alright
Let's start with 8
8 is 2^3
And let's keep dividing it by 2
When we divide 8 by 2, we get 4 = 2^2
yeah
After that, we get 2 = 2^1
After that, we get 2/2 = 1 = 2^0
After that, we get 1/2
Do you know what happened here?
0.5!!!!
yeah!!
And when you keep dividing, the exponent kept decreasing by 1
yes
So that means when we divide 2^0 by 2, we gotta decrease the power of 2^0 by 1
0-1 = ???
-1
Thus, 1/2 = 2^-1
YEAH
That means that 1/z = z^-1
how did i not see
1/number = number^-1
Dw we can't see a lot of things till we go through them from a different perspective
oh ok ok
Alright does that answer all your questions?
hm we’ll see
If you got more questions, feel free to post them
do i just put 7b?
Mhm
ok ok
You're getting good at this
is this correct
Yeppers
alr alr
You need to do 16-18 too or you good?
Aight
The pfp is doing its effect lmao
heh… glad to see its working
@plain granite Has your question been resolved?
i can open another one when i need it
Closed by @plain granite
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
@wheat spruce
Okie
u can send ur question here
No problem man
,rccw
- i or ii?
Both
given,
3 tan A = 4
Have u done
Any work?
assuming u know
$\sin \theta = \frac{1}{\csc \theta},
\cos \theta = \frac{1}{\sec \theta},
\tan \theta = \frac{1}{\cot \theta}$
dexa.cld
here we can find the value of tan A
Okie tysm
tan A = 4/3
Ok tysm
Ahh?
Tysm means thank you so much
np
@drowsy path Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I've done A^(-1)(3; 1) by letting (3; 1)=A(x; y) and then solving for x and y. I got x=11/13 and y=6/13. But I'm not sure how to do the one for B^(-1), since the coordinates of the endpoints of (BA)i and (BA)j aren't integers 
cat bit 
there are some points on the BA grid that do appear to be on integers
ooh :o that actually helps, tysm 
I'm going to try doing it and see if I have any more problems 
I think I got it, tysm cloud 
.close
Closed by @spring forum
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
So a rule ab parallelograms is that those diagonals meet at 90 degrees
U can find the gradient of AE
Negative reciprocal for gradient of BE
Use E coords for line equation
Equate to line AB and find intersection
Sorry I’m not in a situation to work through it rn but I hope this helps
MB RHOMBUS
Wait is it a rhombus in the question tho
no
R u certain? All rhombuses are parallelograms but not all parallelograms are rhombuses
yeah im aware. it says parallelogram
No I know but it could still be a rhombus, bear with me as I check this
doesn't seem righ
t
Okay yeah no clear way to see
Gonna need to crack out the pen and paper, will be back shortly
@civic sage OKAY I am back
Sooo
What I did
I found the line AC
Using points A and E
I then found the change in x between A and E
And bc the magnitude of vector AE and EC are the same
I added this change in x onto the value of x at E
To find the value of x at C
Plugged this into my AC line equation
And found coords of C
I then used the fact that BC is parallel to AD to determine it would have a gradient of 1/4
And using the coords of C, was able to get a line equation for BC
Equated this to the given equation for AB to find x at B
Then used one of them to get the y coord
And that’s that
Posting solution with spoiler
thanks
No problem
.close
Closed by @civic sage
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
the second step
brandon
in the first step, you have -(2n + 1) on the top
then you expand it
in the second step
second line i mean
-(2n + 1) = -2n - 1
nice
np
Closed by @strong marten
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
these are all pretty chill for the most part
managed to go 29-31
stuck on 32-34
32 I wrote as 10x* series k=0 to inf -x^k
$10x \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} (-x)^k$
Paul04
pretty sure that's right
a common trick with producing power series from rationals is to take integrals, derivatives, or perform partial fractions/divide things out
i should say common tricks*
you just have to undo what you did afterwards
but its pretty easy to perform integrals and derivatives on power series after you produce them
okay I think I kinda get what ur saying, can we try these problems?
mhm
alright, how did I do here
this is good, just bring the x inside
and the 10 for that matter
so $ \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} 10x*(-x)^k$
use exponent rules
$\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} 10x*(-x)^k$
Paul04
x^a * x^b = x^(a + b)
(-1)^k * 10x * x^k
note that (-x)^k = (-1)^k * x^k
okay yeah
simplify further
erm
^
(-1)^k * 10 * x^(k+1)
🤔
oh
how can a radius be negative
ur totally right with the lower bound though
okay wait so I gotta do ratio test and allat?
eh
okay then R=1
but like how
you already have it
my instinct is ratio test
so what’s the interval of convergence
this is correct btw, we just sort of have a shortcut bc we know the interval for 1/(1-x)
okay makes sense
1/(1+x) could be a little diff bc now we're alternating
its the same here
but it could be diff in general so it is good to check
you’re done
oh
u did itt
33 and 34 are where the derivative and integral tricks become useful
mhm
no
try writing it as the derivative of some function
for 33, that looks close to a geo series right
yes
it would be convenient if that exponent was gone
okay
how could we get rid of the exponent
take sqrt?
no
thats a good thought
but we ideally want an operation that's easy to perform on power series
as a hint, what’s the derivative of 1/x?
ln|x|
no
oh
like integrals and derivatives
okay
do you see how that’s useful here
no
thats a little worse for us
breh
integrate
we wanna somehow reduce the exponent
at the very least, an integral will give us the exponent we want
we just need to be careful with coefs
it cancels with the - from the -10
ooh yeah
i can do integrals
yay
anyway thats perfect
and now u can do a power series
find a power series for this (also forget the + C)
okay but specifically we should understand why we dont really need the +C
it's because we'll eventually take a derivative to undo the integral
that constant will matter if we do the reverse operations
which you'll see in 34
1/10 * series k=0 to inf -10^k = -(1)^k * 10^k ?
@tm_29495 why did you do an @everyone ping a few weeks ago
oh
i think ur missing an x
wait
what?
in that other server
1/10 * series k=0 to inf -10^k = -(1)^k * 10x^k ?
which one ?
|10x| < 1 . 1/10=R
make sure (10x) is in parentheses but that looks good
not yet
we still have to
bc this power series is of the integral of our function
we want the power series of the original function
so dont worry about IOC yet
I was about to ask lol
okay
so what do I take derivative of?
your power series
yup
yeah
okay so we need IOC now?
now we can do it
okay how though, ratio test?
yup
we didnt need to
ah okay
we just need to find R now
okay
this is the actual power series
right
okay yeah I see the path
ima write this all out neatly when we're done
can we try the last problem really quick?
I'll try to speedrun it see if I understand
ya sure
this one has a few extra steps bc of the reverse direction so itll be good to walk through
try to walk through it and ill just correct as we go
okay
first thought is take derivative and get -4/(1-4x)
then you get -4 * 1/1-4x
-4 * series k=0 to inf of (-4x)^k ?
wait
take it inside
so you get
series k=0 to inf of -4(-4x)^k ?
there is a sign problem no?
this is -4/(1+4x)
yeah exactly
yup

then just ratio test and get R then find interval then test endpoints and gg?
yooooo
okay
it might just be 0 here i havent checked
but f(0) should be the same for both functions, that's an easy way to check what the constant term should be in your power series
wdym both functions
like the original function vs your power series representation
since we took an integral at the end, we have a +C floating in our series
and that gets fixed by whatever the original function is
so whatever f(0) is for the original function will be the +C for the power series?
yeah
yes, that'll be the +C which is just the constant term in the power series
since our current power series starts at the x^1 term
can you elaborate on this please
this is why i reiterated this
k goes from 0 to inf
what's the first term in our series now
I see
which means we don't have a constant specified
and we know after integrating there's a +C
we need to figure out what that +C is, to line up with the original function
okay makes sense
The following error occured while calculating:
Error: Undefined function ln
so 0=-4x?
not exactly
think of the current power series as
C + sum from k=0 to inf of -4x^(k+1)/(k+1)
when we plug x = 0 into this, what do we get
C + sum k=0 to inf 1/(k+1) ?
if x = 0, and k >= 0, every single term in the summation equals 0
its x^k+1 *1/(k+1) dont forget
oh yeah
so C=0 ?
yup
I see
then you would plop the constant in front of your power series
I see
that would be the first term, followed by your existing powers of x
yeah makes sense
yeah a lot more work for these last couple problems than the other ones
in general for this context, f(0) will always be the +C, because integrating a power series will make the smallest degree term x, meaning the entire series equal C after plugging in 0
this is also just how taylor/maclaurin series work
interesting
okay I'll make note of that
tysm for the help, everything is much more clear now
.close
Closed by @sturdy escarp
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Can someone please help me find the partial solutions of this ODE please?
By using lagrange
Someone please
Can riemann help with this?
I bet he can
exp(-3x)
<@&286206848099549185> riemann help please
Noooo riemann is asleep
Can you help brandon?
Do you mean laplace?
Lagrange
Ye
There are 2 ways to solve this, one is with lagrange and the other is with the μέθοδο προσδιοριστέων συντελεστών (sorry idk how to translate that give me one sec)
Determinant coefficient method
The original exercise wants it solved with the second method
But as of now i am trying with lagrange
I want to learn it
Some exercises can only be solved with lagrange and lagrange always works, thats why
$9y^n-12y^2+4y=2^{-3x}?
This please
Fixed it
So
I have $c1e^{2x/3}+c2e^{2x/3}*x$
$c1e^{2/3x}+c2e^{2/3x}*x=0$ is the first equation i take
MichaelRafto
The second one is gonna be a bit messy isnt it?
$c1*2/3e^{2/3x}+c2(e^{2/3x}+2x/3e^{2/3x})=e^{-3x}$
Is this correct?
No wait
Format is kind of messy
Wait you are Greece?
MichaelRafto
Ye
Ah
That is the homogenous solution
brandon
Well i got double root of 2/3 that is why i got that result
Wait so this is correct?
Cause im going to put this in a determinant
Is this determinant the wronskian you are referring to?
I will take |(y1 y'1)T,(y2 y'2)T| if that made any sense
Sorry idk how to use texit that well 😅
brandon
Ye
So i take values from this? This correct, right?
brandon
Good so it is correct
brandon
MichaelRafto
As partial solution
From replacing the c1 and c2 i found
But yes you said that y" must have 1
Not 9
So that is a problem
What do we do now?
I took $c1'=1/Det*W((0, e^{-3x})T, (y_2, y_2')T)$
And i took $c2'=1/Det*W((y_1, y_1')T,(0, e^{-3x})T)$
And then i integrated and found c1, c2 and then i substituted in the homogenous
Idk man im just trying to do what my professor did before me
Also i wrote those wrong one sec
Det being the first wronskian
brandon
Hmm
brandon
How do we do that?
brandon
Huh that is the method chatgpt showed me, ig its the same method we just do it a little bit differently
Idk
Wait what is f(x) though?
Ahhhhh
Can we leave this for tomorrow please i am tired
Sorry
Thanks man
It says the solution is $\frac{e^{-3x}}{121}$
Closed by @crude brook
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hello
does this question make sense to anyone
if so
how do i go about with it
Draw two rays starting from a common point P, forming an angle. Label the vertex and arms of the angle. Then, add a point Q on one of the rays, and draw an interval between P and Q. Next, add two more points, R and S, such that P, R, and S are collinear. Finally, draw a second angle with vertex S and label all points, lines, intervals, and rays.
im confused because is common point P and the vertex of the angle not the same thing?
does it have 2 names or is there something wrong here
and how would i drawn an interval between P and Q if they are already on a ray together?
<@&286206848099549185>
!15m
Please only use the <@&286206848099549185> ping once if your question has not been answered for 15 minutes. Please do not ping or DM individual users about your question.
could you sketch what you understand from the question?
yea sure
bad sketch my bad !
i just want to know if they explained the question wrong or if im not getting something
they tend to incorrectly format questions
^^
,rccw
i think P is the vertex of the angle and the common point as far as my understanding tells me
why would they ask me to label the vertex is p IS the vertex
just confused
i am just as confused as you are mate
maybe others would have a better idea of what's going on
but from my reading through this question P is the vertex
im just gonna skip this question and report it to them later
thanks anyways
nps, but ig you can try asking for a second opinion
@opaque oxide Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @opaque oxide
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
work out both derivatives of y and plug them in??
@pseudo merlin Has your question been resolved?
Closed due to timeout
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Hmm
there's no need for that
there's no integration needed i think?
no really understand this mean but i do understand the caculation
the final answer should be 2 i guess
Part b
yea but they already gave the antiderivative
Sorry, but this channel is now occupied
go look at #❓how-to-get-help to see how to have people answer your question
make a new channel
she's prob right
Y’all forgot the FTC exists 💔 🥀
you plugged in the values to the wrong equation
pmo
clarification: by no integration needed, i mean he doesn't have to find the antiderivative
oh ye
$(\int {0}^{4}\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^{2}+9}}dx=\left[\sqrt{x^{2}+9}\right]{0}^{4}).
Nobita18
Compile Error! Click the
reaction for more information.
(You may edit your message to recompile.)
... because he's already given it for free.
yeah
now just put the values
h do you remember the fundemental theorem of calculus
one question.
you substituted the upper bound
where's the part where you sub the lower bound?
it would be 0
i think this is what everyone else is pointing out to you
no it would be 3
you sure it would be 0?
the formula
sub in your x = 0 and calculate
the 9 is still present
no in that photo they used the wrong equation
the 2x is being multiplied with sqrt(x^2+9)
oh my goodness.
(2(0)sqrt(9))/1
heres something you should know
x is NOT a constant
and the antiderivative of x*f(x) is NOT equal to xF(x) in general
nvm
the formula i guess
what is it again?
in this case f'(x) is x/(sqrt(x^2 + 9))
isnt that ftc2?
yea
so you can just plug in the values into f(x)
for the answer
like the f(b)-f(a) part
does that make sense kinda
When you integrate a function you find an anti-derivative. But you already know what an antiderivative is by part a).
from here
so i dont need to integrate
that's what i said, yes.
you have the anti derivative
I need to interegate the deritive then
I need to use the derivitive to find the anti derivative
well if you think about it you have it already
yea but I dont have the anti derivative
??
did your class teach you how integrals and derivatives are inverses
what did part a give you then
Do you remember what makes something an antiderivative?
the derivative
so what would the original function be in relation to the derivative
just add 1 to the exponent divided by n+1
okok look.
that's only for polynomials
in this part, you showed that the derivative of that thing on the left is the thing on the right
correct?
does this thing remind you of the right side?
well yea
and what is the right side in relation to the left side in part a?
the right side is the ___ of the left side (fill in the blank)
derivative
yes so the function inside the integral would then be f'(x)
original function
so now you are integrating the derivative
that gives you the ___
fill in the blank
btw if with the d/dx in front, it woudnt be the original function
it would be classified as a derivative but not yet evaluated
don't care about the d/dx first
this one
anti derivative
This is the definition of anti-derivative, with an example.
and the antiderivative of a derivative would be the ___
(last blank. fill in with two words that you've answered with before)
original function
good
so you noticed that the left side is the original function
and you are told to integrate the derivative
therefore its antiderivative is the original function, which has been given to you already!
(ignoring the d/dx)
yea ignoring the d/dx
so you just need to apply the F(b) - F(a) part of the FTC
why go through all the trouble integrating again?
part b even gave you the permission to reuse the result from part a by starting with "Hence"
anti derivative of what?
oh my god. do you read?
the antiderivative of the derivative
ok let me make it simple
sqrt(x^2+9) is an antiderivative of x/sqrt(x^2+9).
if differentiating the left side of part a gives you the RHS of part a as the derivative, then integrating the RHS of part a (which is the integrand in part b) must give you the original function back
idk how i can make this more obvious than it is at this point
"if differentiating the left side of part a gives you the RHS of part a as the antiderivative", how would it give the anti derivative
its derivative
woops wording
corrected
my bad
hey how could you spot these tiny mistakes but not the whole picture
idk ngl
focus on the wrong things
Ig im good at finding little mistakes
should i start saying all the wrong stuff so you learn by correcting me
but do you get my point?
" then integrating the RHS of part a (which is the integrand in part b)", how will it be the integrand in part b if it is the derivative in part a
here
Thanks guys
he doesn't understand why the antiderivative for part b is already given in part a
because there's that, idk, big integration symbol next to it?
Oh
oh right yes
Well, it's indeed weird, reverse order, meaning (b) to (a) would make more sense
a to b makes sense as well, because then you can skip the hard part of finding the antiderivative
because it's been proven in a
Of course
I understand this
If you didn't encounter substitution before and are studying the FTC rn then the exercise makes sense in that order
but didnt you say earlier that theres no point of interegating because we were given the derivitive?
You could still try to integrate it by yourself and then verify your answer
you can if you want, but if you want to, make sure you do it right
though in this case, you're expected to use the result from part a anyway
So it's an FTC task?
yes, i presume. the last few questions he had asked are all about FTC2
I guess this sums it up then
did OP get it
I don't know, but I think there is no point in questioning the exercise, and rather just move on
Use FTC as most likely intended, if you wanna go harder, try to solve the integral completely by yourself
i would be more tempted to encourage him to take this as a free pass if not for the fact the past three or four questions he asked were all on the FTC
but this seems to be a more fundamental problem than just the FTC
(pun not intended but i'm sticking with it)
I mean that integral really isn’t the most difficult anyways
so bassically what i need to do is integrate the
derivative
to get the original function?
Yea you can do that
I skipped the other question for now but with 13. b
what If im trying to interegrate the derivative and im getting -1 as the exponent
I don't understand your question
wait dw
give me a sec
I have question, why is u sub used?
is it suggested to use it in complex integral problems?
identify hidden chain rule?
Let's do a concrete example
okay
,, \int \sin,!(x^2) \cdot 2x , dx \overset{u=x^2}{=} \int \sin(u) , du
See we simplified the integrand way nicer
sin(u) is obviously nicer to integrate
An experienced integral try hard would of course see it right away
but you don't always see this instantly, and that's why I said hidden chain rule
I get what you mean but why would you call it hidden chain rule
Because it should remind you the chain rule (hoping you know what chain rule is...)
because it's not always obvious
But usually it's called u-substitution
you don't always know right away what you may substitute
When you see the derivative of some part of the function. Or when you see multiple things being repeated
kinda difficult to generalize it
but let's say it's never bad to attempt a substitution, they mostly work out intuitively
don't over think it rn if you haven't learnt it in class
i wonder if i should post an example of a harder-to-spot u-sub
When you are more experienced you will get a feeling of it when it's worth to apply a sub, as you will be able to tell what terms will cancel and how it may simplify the integrand
ykw send it haha
He's struggling to understand FTC so maybe not 😅
true, i guess just to serve as an example hahah
fair
so I should use this method in harder integraration problems
but how will i know if its
hard?
if your first thought is "shit i need to ask this on mathcord help channels" it's probably hard
As Kirby mentioned, I wouldn't overthink it for now
Also easy integrals can be done with u sub
Such as the integral of 2x•cos(x²)
Even though if it is this easy you will do the substitution or recognize the primitive by eyeballing it
since we are on the topic of u-subs
But you need to know derivatives very very well and also doing a lot of exercise. In general , in order to understand integrals, make sure to master the derivative topic perfectly
#help-36 message
do note that this is a very special instance of a u-sub
I feeel like if i do u sub (especially with easier problems), there is extra steps involved
I feel you're either overthinking or you didn't understand u substitution...
what was the original problem that led to this u-sub in the first place
Im getting to know it
That's a very important step 😬
I just had a general inquiry
i thought if i used this method, it would make my life easier
Sure it does, especially if you can't solve the integral with other methods
this is not a be-all and end-all method
for a lot of complex integrals like those with roots and polynomials under those roots, or weird trig functions, or stuff like that, sure
Ig ill need to be exposed to more integral problems
!done
If you are done with this channel, please mark your problem as solved by typing .close
.close
Closed by @wicked mantle
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
whys I. sufficient to show that the two triangles are similar? I lowkey dont get it
check which similarity tests would get satisfied
You chose A?
the answer key said its A
uhhh im not sure i think both doesnt satisfy the condition
do you know what are the tests?
yea like all three sides having same proportion or all angles having same proportions or two side and one angle verified or like right triangle with pairs
Hi
yes, two side at the same length ratio + one angle, but the angle between them
so like I. is okay, in II. you have wrong angle/wrong side
so the answer key is actually alright
so like the info about the proporiton of LM and PQ shows that the two angles and one sides are matching?
one angle and the two sides that form the angle
yea
however, in statement II, you have the angle that is not between the two sides that you know, so its not gonna work to claim similarity using II
So, I is sufficient
we alr know one of the angle is matching but the proportionality of the side gives info that the other angle is also gonna be matching(?) too so we have enough info to know that the two triangles are similar???
how does side tell you about the angle?
like you have the info: angle LMN and PQR being similar and and QR being 2/3 of MN
so look, you need to use LM and PQ sides, so angle can be between LM-MN and PQ-QR, cuz thats the angle you know
one side + 1 angle is the info that you already have
you are getting a 3rd piece on info from the statements
so, using those 3 pieces you have to determine if it matches the tests you know
info about the side only tells you about the side, and not anything else
oh wait
i didnt see that i was given the lenght of the bottom of triangle
😭
thanks yall 🙂
.close
Closed by @storm fern
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Need help with cyclic groups, recently started group theory
Question comes from an exercise left by lecturer
Let G = <a> be a cyclic group and H a subgroup of G. Prove H is a cyclic group. Hint: work with exponents and use the description of subgroups of (Z,+)
I got stuck defining H, where h is the elements in the form a^m. I feel like m should be larger than n for group G because Order(G) needs to be less than Order(H)
@hallow quartz Has your question been resolved?
Closed by @hallow quartz
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
I’m trying to figure out how this will go... Is there any way to solve this cos ax/sin x?
hey, just dropping by to say you have nice handwriting
Thanks 😭😭
shouldnt it be infty
I don't think L'Hopital's rule applies here because the limits of the numerator and denominator aren't 0 or infinity
is there a way to use the squeeze theorem here
Not if the limit doesn't exist
My teacher banned l hospital since we havent reach there
lhop doesnt even apply
make sense
the limit does exist ill say that
no it doesnt
Soo I should leave it with the limit doesnt exist?
if you wanna be cursed, this is the same as $\lim_{x \to 0} \frac1{x}$
Percy
because sin(x) \approx x lol
but DONT write that
Can you aproximate sin(x) ≈ x and cos(x) ≈ 1 when x ≈ 0?
yep
as x is very very small
you can but its not very rigorous lol
Is this the same case where left & right limit doesnt match? [Saw it but i dont understand lol]
yes!
Or apply the sine subtraction formula
percyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
true truee
Closed by @vocal hemlock
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
how?
multiply on top and bottom by cos(x)
ok
probably a typo
Yes phy do that all the time
the 1 just disappear to limbo
this looks incorrect as-written
Closed by @drowsy obsidian
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
hey i need to proof the red brackets, any hint will be cool
no full answer plz
ive tried few things but it didnt seem to work
yeah it's pretty evident using the unit circle but I think that might be a general result for an invertible odd function
@lyric widget can u explain more about using the unit circle here?
by using trig identites or smth else?
well if you flip the y coordinate then by symmetry the angle also flips
because arcsine is defined from -pi/2 to pi/2 iirc
by flipping u mean -y or pi-y?
it is an inherent property noticed by our dear scientists and mathematicians
well proving it will be interesting too
thank you this helped !
glad to hear!
.close
Closed by @stray crypt
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
How to make the graph
2 mm
what does it mean?
I have to make it in a 2mm graph. How to make it
Ya mb
Wait nhm
*nvm
I got it
.close
Closed by @mystic turret
Use .reopen if this was a mistake.
Send your question here to claim the channel.
Remember:
• Ask your math question in a clear, concise manner.
• Show your work, and if possible, explain where you are stuck.
• After 15 minutes, feel free to ping <@&286206848099549185>.
• Type the command .close to free the channel when you're done.
• Be polite and have a nice day!
Read #❓how-to-get-help for further information on how to ask a good question, and about conduct in the question channels.
Functions